Just 31% of CON MPs think LAB will secure a majority – politicalbetting.com
As can be seen the betting markets are rating the chance of a CON majority as an 10.4% chance which is way off the YouGov polling of Tory MPs. This is of course backed up by real money.
I think the YouGov poll of Tory MPs is completely meaningless, tbh.
How many would be wondering if some employee would see their response, and believe it in the public interest to tell the Guardian - “Tory MP X says party will lose next election.”
Will the Tories be putting up more paper candidates next time?
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Cash-free? No more brown paper envelopes? My.
The advantages of brown envelopes is it means politicians will never vote for a cash free society
Interestingly, they had to be pressured in that direction in the recent financial services bill. But whether they connected bank branches closing with problems in dealing with brown envelopes I don't know. That needs an IQ on the level of sapient pearwood.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
Will the Tories be putting up more paper candidates next time?
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Cash-free? No more brown paper envelopes? My.
The advantages of brown envelopes is it means politicians will never vote for a cash free society
Most politicians take payment in opportunities after they have finished their career. Hence speeches for 6 figures, jobs for 1 days work a year, book advances on books that will sell a few hundred copies etc.
In America it goes much further, with share options a tiny fraction of face value etc….
Will the Tories be putting up more paper candidates next time?
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Cash-free? No more brown paper envelopes? My.
The advantages of brown envelopes is it means politicians will never vote for a cash free society
Most politicians take payment in opportunities after they have finished their career. Hence speeches for 6 figures, jobs for 1 days work a year, book advances on books that will sell a few hundred copies etc.
In America it goes much further, with share options a tiny fraction of face value etc….
I appreciate brown envelopes are merely the tip of the iceberg but on the other hand ever met a politician not greedy enough not to give up even that tip?
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
Drones/cheap cruise missile proliferation mean that in future wars relying on fixed bases may not be a good idea.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
0.84 Scottish ferry builds to completion.
OTOH, Scottish railway projects and bridges do quite well by rUK standards, which is interesting in more than one way. They just don't talk about them in the Unionist newspapers, though.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
@Carnyx I replied to your kind comment on the last thread because I type so bloody slow.
@Peck I didn't even get around to replying to your comment because I was typing so slow in replying to Carnyx, but in reply to your comment about why companies use cheques in those circumstances - that is very cynical of you. I hope you are wrong, but there is that sneaky feeling you might not be.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Will the Tories be putting up more paper candidates next time?
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Cash-free? No more brown paper envelopes? My.
The advantages of brown envelopes is it means politicians will never vote for a cash free society
Most politicians take payment in opportunities after they have finished their career. Hence speeches for 6 figures, jobs for 1 days work a year, book advances on books that will sell a few hundred copies etc.
In America it goes much further, with share options a tiny fraction of face value etc….
I appreciate brown envelopes are merely the tip of the iceberg but on the other hand ever met a politician not greedy enough not to give up even that tip?
Actually taking cash in an envelope would be just for profoundly stupid people. Risk vs reward.
You can literally advertise the post career stuff on your personal website. One leak about one envelope and you are toast.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
0.84 Scottish ferry builds to completion.
OTOH, Scottish railway projects and bridges do quite well by rUK standards, which is interesting in more than one way. They just don't talk about them in the Unionist newspapers, though.
That’s a very low bar indeed. ‘Well, the bad news is it’s a complete failure. The good news is nobody misled Parliament over it to try and get it cancelled.’
The Borders line strikes me as a good example. Delivered on time and in budget and very popular from all I hear - but what prat decided not to electrify it, run it with clapped out two car DMUs and terminate it at Tweedbank?
Will the Tories be putting up more paper candidates next time?
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Cash-free? No more brown paper envelopes? My.
The advantages of brown envelopes is it means politicians will never vote for a cash free society
Most politicians take payment in opportunities after they have finished their career. Hence speeches for 6 figures, jobs for 1 days work a year, book advances on books that will sell a few hundred copies etc.
In America it goes much further, with share options a tiny fraction of face value etc….
I appreciate brown envelopes are merely the tip of the iceberg but on the other hand ever met a politician not greedy enough not to give up even that tip?
Actually taking cash in an envelope would be just for profoundly stupid people. Risk vs reward.
You can literally advertise the post career stuff on your personal website. One leak about one envelope and you are toast.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
And if the Ukrainians had kept their deterrent?
Besides is there a conceivable situation for which Russia commit to a conventional attack on the UK? They cant even get past Ukraine, I'd imagine Poland would be 10x harder and our islander would be on the puffin diet if he even tried.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
And if the Ukrainians had kept their deterrent?
Besides is there a conceivable situation for which Russia commit to a conventional attack on the UK? They cant even get past Ukraine, I'd imagine Poland would be 10x harder and our islander would be on the puffin diet if he even tried.
If they had kept their deterrent the russian arseholes wouldn't have taken a holiday in crimea
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
0.84 Scottish ferry builds to completion.
OTOH, Scottish railway projects and bridges do quite well by rUK standards, which is interesting in more than one way. They just don't talk about them in the Unionist newspapers, though.
That’s a very low bar indeed. ‘Well, the bad news is it’s a complete failure. The good news is nobody misled Parliament over it to try and get it cancelled.’
The Borders line strikes me as a good example. Delivered on time and in budget and very popular from all I hear - but what prat decided not to electrify it, run it with clapped out two car DMUs and terminate it at Tweedbank?
The standard Trseasury model, I believe. Came out with the wrong, or right, figures depending on one's p of v - happened before, eg with the Bathgate line which was a huge success contary to the model (but was proper built, double track all the way with electric). The other problem however was relentless political opposition from the usual suspects, which made proper construction all the more politically difficult. Didn't help having the sort of *local* councillor who actually called for the money to be spent oin glasgow instead.
Though there are more and sometimews longer trains now.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
If you believe the UK is going to fight a conventional war against Russia then, as the SMO demonstrates, doing anything other than buying massive stockpiles of ammo is probably pointless. It's difficult to get political will for that because a warehouse isn't an exciting photo op like a FGR4 on the M62 is.
The Russians can't take Kharkov which is 30 fucking km from their border so the idea that they are any sort of conventional threat to the UK is as threadbare as Sunak's undescended testicles.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
There wont be any planes right? The bases will be gone, the pilots gone. It just seems they might be better off practicing sinking small boats for when Reform get in.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
If you believe the UK is going to fight a conventional war against Russia then, as the SMO demonstrates, doing anything other than buying massive stockpiles of ammo is probably pointless. It's difficult to get political will for that because a warehouse isn't an exciting photo op like a FGR4 on the M62 is.
The Russians can't take Kharkov which is 30 fucking km from their border so the idea that they are any sort of conventional threat to the UK is as threadbare as Sunak's undescended testicles.
Dads army could probably beat the russian war machine from what we have seen
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
If you believe the UK is going to fight a conventional war against Russia then, as the SMO demonstrates, doing anything other than buying massive stockpiles of ammo is probably pointless. It's difficult to get political will for that because a warehouse isn't an exciting photo op like a FGR4 on the M62 is.
The Russians can't take Kharkov which is 30 fucking km from their border so the idea that they are any sort of conventional threat to the UK is as threadbare as Sunak's undescended testicles.
All probably true - but I bet you'd have a go at it if offered the chance. You could break your motorway speed record.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point of preparation is to raise the cost of war - and hopefully prevent it. Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
If you believe the UK is going to fight a conventional war against Russia then, as the SMO demonstrates, doing anything other than buying massive stockpiles of ammo is probably pointless. It's difficult to get political will for that because a warehouse isn't an exciting photo op like a FGR4 on the M62 is.
The Russians can't take Kharkov which is 30 fucking km from their border so the idea that they are any sort of conventional threat to the UK is as threadbare as Sunak's undescended testicles.
You need to start switching on, laddie. Have you not heard our generals on the media saying that the UK should put itself on a war footing which means (huge shock) dramatically increasing defence spending and fort he general population to be prepared for war.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Yes, but if Stonehenge traffic is sticky *because* people want to drive past Stonehenge, this plan won't help.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Becauise it looks better for a pol being photographed with hi-vis with the stones as a backdrop, rather than some manky bit of the unknown [to London elite types] world north of Watford Gap.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Yes, but if Stonehenge traffic is sticky *because* people want to drive past Stonehenge, this plan won't help.
Well, it would, because it would stop them from dawdling to gape at it.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Yes, but if Stonehenge traffic is sticky *because* people want to drive past Stonehenge, this plan won't help.
Well, it would, because it would stop them from dawdling to gape at it.
I believe the idea is not merely to close the A303 past the stones, above ground, but also to remove the [edit] stretch past the stones.
Will also make it easier to fortify it with razor wire and charge more folk (for seeing it was what I meant, but I daresay it will increase the tactical options for the next Battle of the Beanfield).
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Your kidding, right? It is the main commuter highway for army officers to get back to Warminster/Netheravon/Salisbury Plain/etc after partying the previous night in London.
I think it's a shame they are burying the road. Yes it is often at a standstill but it was great to see the stones come into sight as you drive over the hill at O Fuck Hundred hours. And for me it will stand out as being the road where I have driven the fastest I have ever driven.
130mph plus and a Vauxhall Senator (replacement hire car) if you must know.
The pressure did something or other inside the car I'm sure Dura can explain.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Yes, but if Stonehenge traffic is sticky *because* people want to drive past Stonehenge, this plan won't help.
Well, it would, because it would stop them from dawdling to gape at it.
I believe the idea is not merely to close the A303 past the stones, above ground, but also to remove the [edit] stretch past the stones.
Will also make it easier to fortify it with razor wire and charge more folk (for seeing it was what I meant, but I daresay it will increase the tactical options for the next Battle of the Beanfield).
The one time I went to Stonehenge, I didn't pay a thing.
I cycled up from Salisbury and went along the public footpath behind the fence.
I don't think I lost anything by doing so either, except possibly some weight I could easily do without.
On topic, I think its sweet that as many Tory as MPs as reported still think the party will win the election. Sure, plenty of individual MPs will win their seats. But the party being re-elected as the government? Bless.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
Anything more than 21,000lbs (depending on engine variant and local conditions) and you aren't going anywhere vertically in a Harrier so VTOL is useless for actual ops.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
I wonder whether NOM at 4, (25%, or 3/1), could be value? I notice that of the groups polled here (feels a bit voodoo?) none have even a bare majority backing a Labour victory (325+).
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
Anything more than 21,000lbs (depending on engine variant and local conditions) and you aren't going anywhere vertically in a Harrier so VTOL is useless for actual ops.
Just rmemembering when I were a bairn the fuss that was made when some poor crab fat type got the job of landing and taking off a RAF Harrier from the old railway coal delivery sidings where the BL or something is now, at St Pancras to race a FAA Phantom across the Atlantic. The amount of coal dust blasted up must have been phenomenal.
ISTR it was made out as a major triumph in the Cold War preparations, but they wernt and cancelled the VTOL transport needed to supply it. And as you say it couldn't take off unless it had a field as well to run along. No idea how well it could operate off grass.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
Anything more than 21,000lbs (depending on engine variant and local conditions) and you aren't going anywhere vertically in a Harrier so VTOL is useless for actual ops.
Just rmemembering when I were a bairn the fuss that was made when some poor crab fat type got the job of landing and taking off a RAF Harrier from the old railway coal delivery sidings where the BL or something is now, at St Pancras to race a FAA Phantom across the Atlantic. The amount of coal dust blasted up must have been phenomenal.
ISTR it was made out as a major triumph in the Cold War preparations, but they wernt and cancelled the VTOL transport needed to supply it. And as you say it couldn't take off unless it had a field as well to run along. No idea how well it could operate off grass.
The Harrrier pilot was artfully selected as he was an ETPS graduate, had decades of experience in just about every post war RAF jet and was renowned for having "good hands".
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Hmm, the hidden subtext is that the landlord is unwell and perhaps out of it physically or mentally and his children probably need to fund his care. So it's not a case of Mr Rachman Mk 2 either.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
Anything more than 21,000lbs (depending on engine variant and local conditions) and you aren't going anywhere vertically in a Harrier so VTOL is useless for actual ops.
Just rmemembering when I were a bairn the fuss that was made when some poor crab fat type got the job of landing and taking off a RAF Harrier from the old railway coal delivery sidings where the BL or something is now, at St Pancras to race a FAA Phantom across the Atlantic. The amount of coal dust blasted up must have been phenomenal.
ISTR it was made out as a major triumph in the Cold War preparations, but they wernt and cancelled the VTOL transport needed to supply it. And as you say it couldn't take off unless it had a field as well to run along. No idea how well it could operate off grass.
Grass TOs didn't degrade performance at all - no problem. Grass landing: fucking terrifying as it liked to swap ends. Hence the aluminium mats for dispersed ops in the Cold War.
"Like so many, Brydon learnt his trade at the barstool of Barry Cryer and shared one of the last jokes he heard from the maestro about a vicar taking a funeral who asks the widower if he has any questions. “Yes, what’s the wifi code?” the man asks. The vicar is shocked at this callous response. “We are burying your wife,” he says, to which the man replies: “All lower case?” "
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
Some northern bits of the M6 wouldn't be too disruptive. The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
I'm liking this plan already.
They used to have things called "Harriers" which didn't need long strips of tarmac to take off. Problem, ISTR, was they got given away to the USMC to tidy up the accounts. But I'm not sure how good they were in actually carrying bombloads in VTOL, and getting the support vehicles, spares etc. to some basha in the woods in the middle of **** nowhere was also a big problem, even if the RAF Regiment got great photo ops in their Landies and CVRT out of it all.
Anything more than 21,000lbs (depending on engine variant and local conditions) and you aren't going anywhere vertically in a Harrier so VTOL is useless for actual ops.
Just rmemembering when I were a bairn the fuss that was made when some poor crab fat type got the job of landing and taking off a RAF Harrier from the old railway coal delivery sidings where the BL or something is now, at St Pancras to race a FAA Phantom across the Atlantic. The amount of coal dust blasted up must have been phenomenal.
ISTR it was made out as a major triumph in the Cold War preparations, but they wernt and cancelled the VTOL transport needed to supply it. And as you say it couldn't take off unless it had a field as well to run along. No idea how well it could operate off grass.
Grass TOs didn't degrade performance at all - no problem. Grass landing: fucking terrifying as it liked to swap ends.
You mean Con MPs may be a wee bit out of touch? But if they actually faced the facts they'd be resigning, semi-resigning and announcing their retirements in droves wouldn't they...
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Surely the lack of affordable housing is not unconnected with the fact that the population of the UK has grown by around 20% in the last 30 years - a historically unprecedented increase in either real or absolute terms?
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Surely the lack of affordable housing is not unconnected with the fact that the population of the UK has grown by around 20% in the last 30 years - a historically unprecedented increase in either real or absolute terms?
Up to a point but there are also vast tracts of the country where you can't give homes away. The economy is desperately unbalanced, hence Levelling Up (the slogan, not the reality) and Brexit.
The header is wrong - only 16% of Con MPs think Lab will get a majority (3% large majority, 13% small majority).
The light red bar is a Hung Parliament with a Labour led Govt (18%)
Yes. Also it is the category with the most consistent level of support across the groups. Perhaps it is the view of Mr Sensible. It should not be ruled out.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Surely the lack of affordable housing is not unconnected with the fact that the population of the UK has grown by around 20% in the last 30 years - a historically unprecedented increase in either real or absolute terms?
It’s more that the advocates (and implementors) of population growth on a scale usually seen in developing countries, demand the expansion of housing and services match a stable population.
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
What's the point? As Jeremy Clarkson showed in his race against the sun on Top Gear, the only reason for taking the A303 rather than the M5 and M4 is in order to see Stonehenge. If you are going to drive underneath it, you may as well have taken the motorways in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Possibly to improve traffic flows in the area?
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Yes, but if Stonehenge traffic is sticky *because* people want to drive past Stonehenge, this plan won't help.
Well, it would, because it would stop them from dawdling to gape at it.
I believe the idea is not merely to close the A303 past the stones, above ground, but also to remove the [edit] stretch past the stones.
Will also make it easier to fortify it with razor wire and charge more folk (for seeing it was what I meant, but I daresay it will increase the tactical options for the next Battle of the Beanfield).
The one time I went to Stonehenge, I didn't pay a thing.
I cycled up from Salisbury and went along the public footpath behind the fence.
I don't think I lost anything by doing so either, except possibly some weight I could easily do without.
Lovely cycle run too.
The only scary bit was crossing the A303...
I've cycled for about 5km ON the A303 just west of Stonehenge. At night.
It must be true because Strava says so (well, actually a highlighter mark on an old map, as it was 30 years ago).
Not the finest decision ever although the traffic wasn't quite as mental then.
To be fair, the time trials they used to run on the A63 west of Hull were higher up the "is this a good idea?" scale.
‘No point climbing the greasy pole’: Tory ministers want out in reshuffle ... ... talk of a reshuffle next Friday growing, some [ministers] admit privately they have signalled a desire to move to the backbenches. Doing so allows them to start running down the clock on the up-to-two-year ban that can be imposed on taking up a private sector job after leaving Whitehall. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/14/no-point-climbing-the-greasy-pole-tory-ministers-want-out-in-reshuffle
What price Nadine Dorries next Chancellor of the Exchequer?
‘No point climbing the greasy pole’: Tory ministers want out in reshuffle ... ... talk of a reshuffle next Friday growing, some [ministers] admit privately they have signalled a desire to move to the backbenches. Doing so allows them to start running down the clock on the up-to-two-year ban that can be imposed on taking up a private sector job after leaving Whitehall. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/14/no-point-climbing-the-greasy-pole-tory-ministers-want-out-in-reshuffle
What price Nadine Dorries next Chancellor of the Exchequer?
No. Truss for CoE and then leader before next GE, which she will win. That’s behind the apparent confidence of the Tories. The market’s up - get in at 60 while you still can. Free money.
Such distributed operating models also were used by NATO members during the Cold War. But the extra costs imposed by such a strategy, including the need for additional spares and trained maintainers, have driven many air forces to focus on optimizing the efficiency of main operating bases.
The costs of distributed operations have risen with the increasing sophistication of frontline aircraft, such as Typhoons and F-35Bs.
The demonstrations are intended to reveal any gaps in the RAF’s ability to operate away from its main operating bases for short periods, Smyth said...
What's the point? Any actual war with Russia and this isle will be atom bombed to fuck. We'll all be dead and some poor Western Isler will have a diet of puffin aux bladder wrack for the next 100 years.
The point, for the MoD and RAF, is to generate media coverage of something vaguely novel.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
In "Threads" the first bomb you see has the grid coordinates of RAF Finningley up on the board [Soon to be compulsorily purchased, apparently, depending on who needs what bung].
I am told by someone reliable that the runway is many many metres of concrete and therefore bomb proof.
Not as if the Vulcans were going to return to base, though, was it?
TSE said: "I'm thinking about doing a cashless society thread for Sunday."
Thanks for the warning. For some reason, I am reminded of this bit from one of my favorite authors:
"Notoriously insensitive to suble shifts in mood, childen will persist in discussing the color of a recently sighted cement-mixer, long after one's own interest in the topic has waned."
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Surely the lack of affordable housing is not unconnected with the fact that the population of the UK has grown by around 20% in the last 30 years - a historically unprecedented increase in either real or absolute terms?
Yes. A rise of 10 million, with some quite small areas (like London) disproportionately changed. (Rural Cumbria has hardly changed its population in that time). The combination of a massive increase and the complete failure to plan for it is one of the greatest post war political failures.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
It's the council's responsibility not the government
The odd part is that the article doesn't explain why the three of them cannot rent another flat or house, given they were renting privately before. Perhaps they were on a very advantageous rent.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
It's the council's responsibility not the government
The odd part is that the article doesn't explain why the three of them cannot rent another flat or house, given they were renting privately before. Perhaps they were on a very advantageous rent.
With one of them disabled, and with a broken hip, that poses a number of constraints on what is even physically possible.
‘No point climbing the greasy pole’: Tory ministers want out in reshuffle ... ... talk of a reshuffle next Friday growing, some [ministers] admit privately they have signalled a desire to move to the backbenches. Doing so allows them to start running down the clock on the up-to-two-year ban that can be imposed on taking up a private sector job after leaving Whitehall. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/14/no-point-climbing-the-greasy-pole-tory-ministers-want-out-in-reshuffle
What price Nadine Dorries next Chancellor of the Exchequer?
No. Truss for CoE and then leader before next GE, which she will win. That’s behind the apparent confidence of the Tories. The market’s up - get in at 60 while you still can. Free money.
Liz Truss led the Tories to their lowest poll rating in history, just 14% at one stage, she has more chance of winning Eurovision than being Tory leader again, let alone PM
TSE said: "I'm thinking about doing a cashless society thread for Sunday."
Thanks for the warning. For some reason, I am reminded of this bit from one of my favorite authors:
"Notoriously insensitive to suble shifts in mood, childen will persist in discussing the color of a recently sighted cement-mixer, long after one's own interest in the topic has waned."
As the opinions on 'cashless' on PB range the spectrum from compulsory to forbidden it is sure to generate harmony and consensus. Could we stick to anodyne neutral topics like Brexit, the Waverley line and roads to Stonehenge?
TSE said: "I'm thinking about doing a cashless society thread for Sunday."
Thanks for the warning. For some reason, I am reminded of this bit from one of my favorite authors:
"Notoriously insensitive to suble shifts in mood, childen will persist in discussing the color of a recently sighted cement-mixer, long after one's own interest in the topic has waned."
As the opinions on 'cashless' on PB range the spectrum from compulsory to forbidden it is sure to generate harmony and consensus. Could we stick to anodyne neutral topics like Brexit, the Waverley line and roads to Stonehenge?
I'd be impressed if even TSE could find something new to say. But it might be about the new legislation.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
Someone upskirt Chris Chope and see if they can find his brain.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
Surely the lack of affordable housing is not unconnected with the fact that the population of the UK has grown by around 20% in the last 30 years - a historically unprecedented increase in either real or absolute terms?
Yes. A rise of 10 million, with some quite small areas (like London) disproportionately changed. (Rural Cumbria has hardly changed its population in that time). The combination of a massive increase and the complete failure to plan for it is one of the greatest post war political failures.
If people keep moving to the country, then at some basic level, housing remains affordable.
It may not be relatively cheap - but that is because tastes have changed since the days of draughty car-dependent houses in distant new towns, and developing on urban sites is more expensive.
“All I’ve ever wanted is to own my own home,” Waring says. She lives with her parents in Goole, a 25-minute drive from Selby. The 22-year-old graduated from York St John’s University with a degree in English literature and creative writing in 2022 and works as a lettings negotiator, earning about £18,000 a year.
£18,000 a year is less than minimum wage for a 35 hour week.
Given we have full employment and rising wages that suggests a creative writing degree from a crap university has had a negative effect on her earning potential.
And I suspect that few people at any time have been able to buy a house when earning so little.
Amusingly the Times reports that 'Selby has had a Tory MP “for as long as anyone can remember”, says one local'
Bad memories in Selby as it had a Labour MP between 1997 and 2010.
“All I’ve ever wanted is to own my own home,” Waring says. She lives with her parents in Goole, a 25-minute drive from Selby. The 22-year-old graduated from York St John’s University with a degree in English literature and creative writing in 2022 and works as a lettings negotiator, earning about £18,000 a year.
£18,000 a year is less than minimum wage for a 35 hour week.
Given we have full employment and rising wages that suggests a creative writing degree from a crap university has had a negative effect on her earning potential.
And I suspect that few people at any time have been able to buy a house when earning so little.
Amusingly the Times reports that 'Selby has had a Tory MP “for as long as anyone can remember”, says one local'
Bad memories in Selby as it had a Labour MP between 1997 and 2010.
22 yo, though, so min wage is 10.18 ph, which works out at 18.5K at 35hrs.
And estate agents don't practise creative writing??
‘No point climbing the greasy pole’: Tory ministers want out in reshuffle ... ... talk of a reshuffle next Friday growing, some [ministers] admit privately they have signalled a desire to move to the backbenches. Doing so allows them to start running down the clock on the up-to-two-year ban that can be imposed on taking up a private sector job after leaving Whitehall. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/14/no-point-climbing-the-greasy-pole-tory-ministers-want-out-in-reshuffle
What price Nadine Dorries next Chancellor of the Exchequer?
No. Truss for CoE and then leader before next GE, which she will win. That’s behind the apparent confidence of the Tories. The market’s up - get in at 60 while you still can. Free money.
Liz Truss led the Tories to their lowest poll rating in history, just 14% at one stage, she has more chance of winning Eurovision than being Tory leader again, let alone PM
“All I’ve ever wanted is to own my own home,” Waring says. She lives with her parents in Goole, a 25-minute drive from Selby. The 22-year-old graduated from York St John’s University with a degree in English literature and creative writing in 2022 and works as a lettings negotiator, earning about £18,000 a year.
£18,000 a year is less than minimum wage for a 35 hour week.
Given we have full employment and rising wages that suggests a creative writing degree from a crap university has had a negative effect on her earning potential.
And I suspect that few people at any time have been able to buy a house when earning so little.
Amusingly the Times reports that 'Selby has had a Tory MP “for as long as anyone can remember”, says one local'
Bad memories in Selby as it had a Labour MP between 1997 and 2010.
Goole isn't in Selby, anyway. It's in Brigg and Goole.
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
It's the council's responsibility not the government
The odd part is that the article doesn't explain why the three of them cannot rent another flat or house, given they were renting privately before. Perhaps they were on a very advantageous rent.
Who decides how much money the council gets? Who sold all the council houses?
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
It's the council's responsibility not the government
The odd part is that the article doesn't explain why the three of them cannot rent another flat or house, given they were renting privately before. Perhaps they were on a very advantageous rent.
Who decides how much money the council gets? Who sold all the council houses?
And who wouldn't let the council use the money to build replacements?
Off topic, but I think many of you will find this cheering:
George Will says that neither Trump nor DeSantis will get the Republican nomination:
"Inevitably, there comes a rebellion against inevitability. Voters have been told that Donald Trump is the all-but-inevitable Republican nominee and that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, operating atop a mountain of cash, will inevitably be Trump’s only significant challenger.
Voters, however, become contrary when told that the game’s outcome is known in the top of the first inning. Hence what G.K. Chesterton called the game of “Cheat the Prophet”: People listen politely to explanations of what is inevitable, then make something else happen."
(There are examples that support his argument, but I must should add this cautionary note: For decades, I have thought that Will was better with words than numbers.)
Comments
Or have they gone paperless and just use their phones?
Rome 33
Naples 31
Lisbon 26
Milan 28
Nice 28
Barcelona 29
This just out. Wonder which will take longer to build, the henge with every stone shaped and ground by hand, or the tunnel with modern project management and machinery?
In America it goes much further, with share options a tiny fraction of face value etc….
Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought he could easily defeat it.
In a sensible world everyone would have smaller armed forces - but that means everyone.
@Carnyx I replied to your kind comment on the last thread because I type so bloody slow.
@Peck I didn't even get around to replying to your comment because I was typing so slow in replying to Carnyx, but in reply to your comment about why companies use cheques in those circumstances - that is very cynical of you. I hope you are wrong, but there is that sneaky feeling you might not be.
Jaguars used to use the M55 before it opened but it's hard to see where this could be done in the UK without causing fucking chaos.
You can literally advertise the post career stuff on your personal website. One leak about one envelope and you are toast.
The Borders line strikes me as a good example. Delivered on time and in budget and very popular from all I hear - but what prat decided not to electrify it, run it with clapped out two car DMUs and terminate it at Tweedbank?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuANURnBzWQ
Besides is there a conceivable situation for which Russia commit to a conventional attack on the UK? They cant even get past Ukraine, I'd imagine Poland would be 10x harder and our islander would be on the puffin diet if he even tried.
@LOS_Fisher
·
Jul 9
I’ve been to Uxbridge twice in the past fortnight to speak to voters in different parts of the seat.
Most striking thing was how many people said variations of ‘it’s time for a change’.
V good news for Labour if it’s a UK-wide trend…
https://twitter.com/LOS_Fisher
Though there are more and sometimews longer trains now.
The Russians can't take Kharkov which is 30 fucking km from their border so the idea that they are any sort of conventional threat to the UK is as threadbare as Sunak's undescended testicles.
The M45, perhaps?
You'd have to take down a few smart motorway gantries.
Does anyone known whether QR codes can usually be scanned from laptop screens? If so it would make life slightly easier.
You could break your motorway speed record.
(Also, have you ever taken the M5 past Bristol?)
Coz we is the UK innit.
Will also make it easier to fortify it with razor wire and charge more folk (for seeing it was what I meant, but I daresay it will increase the tactical options for the next Battle of the Beanfield).
I think it's a shame they are burying the road. Yes it is often at a standstill but it was great to see the stones come into sight as you drive over the hill at O Fuck Hundred hours. And for me it will stand out as being the road where I have driven the fastest I have ever driven.
130mph plus and a Vauxhall Senator (replacement hire car) if you must know.
The pressure did something or other inside the car I'm sure Dura can explain.
I cycled up from Salisbury and went along the public footpath behind the fence.
I don't think I lost anything by doing so either, except possibly some weight I could easily do without.
Lovely cycle run too.
The only scary bit was crossing the A303...
I don't know what is a sadder reflection on this country, the fact that this 98 year old D Day veteran is treated so shabbily, or that his Tory MP's only response is to try to blame it on refugees. This government really is out of answers.
... banks can share people’s personal information as long as it is done "transparently and proportionately"
https://www.racingpost.com/news/gambling-review/privacy-watchdog-backs-plans-allowing-financial-data-to-be-shared-with-gambling-firms-a5Yud4N5v7Ua/
Maybe cash under the bed would be safer, or at least more discreet.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=air+race+harrier+st+pancras#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:6419c1d1,vid:Dt45BENU7_0
ISTR it was made out as a major triumph in the Cold War preparations, but they wernt and cancelled the VTOL transport needed to supply it. And as you say it couldn't take off unless it had a field as well to run along. No idea how well it could operate off grass.
This is exactly the kind of story that provokes fascist clickbait "info"graphics of the kind my moron aunt reposts. "Why do we give homes to asylum seekers when we don't look after our own veterans?" posts a front org for Britain First etc.
We don't. Upskirt Chope notes the cash being spent on a barge. Because there's nowhere to house anyone. Perhaps the issue is the lack of affordable housing, and the lack of council/HA housing due to the exact policies he and his have spent decades championing?
The light red bar is a Hung Parliament with a Labour led Govt (18%)
"Like so many, Brydon learnt his trade at the barstool of Barry Cryer and shared one of the last jokes he heard from the maestro about a vicar taking a funeral who asks the widower if he has any questions. “Yes, what’s the wifi code?” the man asks. The vicar is shocked at this callous response. “We are burying your wife,” he says, to which the man replies: “All lower case?” "
It must be true because Strava says so (well, actually a highlighter mark on an old map, as it was 30 years ago).
Not the finest decision ever although the traffic wasn't quite as mental then.
To be fair, the time trials they used to run on the A63 west of Hull were higher up the "is this a good idea?" scale.
...
... talk of a reshuffle next Friday growing, some [ministers] admit privately they have signalled a desire to move to the backbenches. Doing so allows them to start running down the clock on the up-to-two-year ban that can be imposed on taking up a private sector job after leaving Whitehall.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/14/no-point-climbing-the-greasy-pole-tory-ministers-want-out-in-reshuffle
What price Nadine Dorries next Chancellor of the Exchequer?
Tonnes of anger about it, with even those not directly affected concerned.
Some affronted on the part of family/friends impacted, others furious bc they predict local businesses will pass on costs to customers'
https://twitter.com/LOS_Fisher/status/1678002084942082049?s=20
I am told by someone reliable that the runway is many many metres of concrete and therefore bomb proof.
Not as if the Vulcans were going to return to base, though, was it?
Thanks for the warning. For some reason, I am reminded of this bit from one of my favorite authors:
"Notoriously insensitive to suble shifts in mood, childen will persist in discussing the color of a recently sighted cement-mixer, long after one's own interest in the topic has waned."
source$: https://www.amazon.com/Metropolitan-Life-Fran-Lebowitz/dp/0525155627
(From her "Children: Pro or Con?")
The odd part is that the article doesn't explain why the three of them cannot rent another flat or house, given they were renting privately before. Perhaps they were on a very advantageous rent.
It may not be relatively cheap - but that is because tastes have changed since the days of draughty car-dependent houses in distant new towns, and developing on urban sites is more expensive.
“All I’ve ever wanted is to own my own home,” Waring says. She lives with her parents in Goole, a 25-minute drive from Selby. The 22-year-old graduated from York St John’s University with a degree in English literature and creative writing in 2022 and works as a lettings negotiator, earning about £18,000 a year.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-housing-will-dominate-the-selby-by-election-jzr8dzl3p
£18,000 a year is less than minimum wage for a 35 hour week.
Given we have full employment and rising wages that suggests a creative writing degree from a crap university has had a negative effect on her earning potential.
And I suspect that few people at any time have been able to buy a house when earning so little.
Amusingly the Times reports that 'Selby has had a Tory MP “for as long as anyone can remember”, says one local'
Bad memories in Selby as it had a Labour MP between 1997 and 2010.
I'm betting on Uxbridge and it would be good to know.
And estate agents don't practise creative writing??
Presumably you have your house on it?
George Will says that neither Trump nor DeSantis will get the Republican nomination:
"Inevitably, there comes a rebellion against inevitability. Voters have been told that Donald Trump is the all-but-inevitable Republican nominee and that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, operating atop a mountain of cash, will inevitably be Trump’s only significant challenger.
Voters, however, become contrary when told that the game’s outcome is known in the top of the first inning. Hence what G.K. Chesterton called the game of “Cheat the Prophet”: People listen politely to explanations of what is inevitable, then make something else happen."
source$: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/14/trump-desantis-not-inevitable/
(There are examples that support his argument, but I must should add this cautionary note: For decades, I have thought that Will was better with words than numbers.)