Does anyone think we could actually see Trump behind bars?
Just use one of the AI generators.
Talking of AI, this is a really good explanation, understandable by a layman, of what ChatGPT actually does, and why it is very good at answering some questions, and very bad at others:
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
Wait until Karen Adams hears what I said about, inter alia, Liz Truss and Sir Gavin Williamson.
I really don't know why people constantly fall into these kinds of trap. Unless they are misquoting her it wouldn't be hard to suggest he faces racist motivations from some without implying anyone criticising him is doing so unfairly and or in a racism way.
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
Wait until Karen Adams hears what I said about, inter alia, Liz Truss and Sir Gavin Williamson.
Some of us might find it a little ironic that anyone that is part of a party/movement that is riddled with Anglophobia and hate filled prejudice could play that card. It is a bit like Trump calling someone boorish or Boris Johnson calling someone dishonest!
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
Seems worth a try. Can we add the Twitter Dog Thing as well?
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
Add in Princess Diana and Madeline McCann perhaps?
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
I got the conviction.
Wow. Er. Well done? Are you allowed to talk about the wider issues? J k Rowling is piling on. My god she hates the SNP
I really shouldn’t say too much because it is claimed there is an appeal coming. He was young, slightly inadequate, immature so there was plenty mitigation. But I didn’t see this coming.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
I got the conviction.
Wow. Er. Well done? Are you allowed to talk about the wider issues? J k Rowling is piling on. My god she hates the SNP
I really shouldn’t say too much because it is claimed there is an appeal coming. He was young, slightly inadequate, immature so there was plenty mitigation. But I didn’t see this coming.
Thanks.
It does seem excruciatingly unfair on the 13 year old VICTIM. He doesn’t even do a day in jail?
Hey Ho. I don’t know the details so I’ll leave it there
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
Add in Princess Diana and Madeline McCann perhaps?
I think that might go beyond blowing up the internet and instead provoke a supernova.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
17 is young but not that young. The age of criminal responsibility in Scotland is 12. You would expect him at least to go to a young offenders institute for a crime that serious?
Even if not in this case (it will, apparently, be one of the tougher ones) he does appear to have committed some crimes, or at least there is compelling evidence he did in some cases to a level that needs testing.
How to avoid martyring him at some point during those cases?
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
And Naga Munchetty. Rare is the day she hasn't said or done something worthy of a clickbait article in the Mailiverse.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
The presumption seems to be that they won't.
What makes this even odder, at least judging by the news reports, is that. mitigating factors aside, there were some pretty strong aggravating factors: the victim was just 13. The judge's remark that if he had been over 25 the sentence would have been 4-5 years imprisonment is itself, on the face of it, odd: surely one would expect a much longer sentence?
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
Yes. The guidance now is that the male brain does not mature until you are 25 ( and you might think that optimistic on some cases) so you are more prone to impulsive behaviour and have poorer judgment. These are mitigating factors. But wow.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
The presumption seems to be that they won't.
What makes this even odder, at least judging by the news reports, is that. mitigating factors aside, there were some pretty strong aggravating factors: the victim was just 13. The judge's remark that if he had been over 25 the sentence would have been 4-5 years imprisonment is itself, on the face of it, odd: surely one would expect a much longer sentence?
Quite so. Rape of a 13 year old by a 25 year old would get you 10 years, generally
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
This is the key section of the Scottish Sentencing Council guidelines for the sentencing of young people (defined elsewhere in the document as those aged under 25 at the time when the offence was committed):
20. The full range of sentencing options remains open to the court. However, the nature and duration of a sentence imposed on a young person should be different from that which might be imposed on an older person being sentenced for the same, or a similar, offence.
21. A custodial sentence should only be imposed on a young person when the court is satisfied that no other sentence is appropriate. If a custodial sentence is imposed on a young person, it should be shorter than that which would have been imposed on an older person for the same, or a similar, offence.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
Yes. The guidance now is that the male brain does not mature until you are 25 ( and you might think that optimistic on some cases) so you are more prone to impulsive behaviour and have poorer judgment. These are mitigating factors. But wow.
"A new sentencing guideline developed by the Scottish Sentencing Council comes into effect in all courts in Scotland today (Wednesday, 26 January 2022).
The sentencing young people guideline applies to the sentencing of those who are under the age of 25 at the date of their plea of guilty or when a finding of guilt is made against them.
It was developed over an intensive period of stakeholder engagement and research, culminating in a full public consultation in 2020 and its approval by the High Court on 09 November 2021.
Reflecting compelling scientific evidence on the development of cognitive maturity, the guideline says that a young person will generally have a lower level of maturity, and a greater capacity for change and rehabilitation, than an older person.
For this reason, it states that rehabilitation should be a primary consideration when sentencing a young person.
The Council considers that this will help to achieve one of the guideline’s key aims: to reduce reoffending among young people, and thereby help to increase public safety."
"A new sentencing guideline developed by the Scottish Sentencing Council comes into effect in all courts in Scotland today (Wednesday, 26 January 2022).
The sentencing young people guideline applies to the sentencing of those who are under the age of 25 at the date of their plea of guilty or when a finding of guilt is made against them.
It was developed over an intensive period of stakeholder engagement and research, culminating in a full public consultation in 2020 and its approval by the High Court on 09 November 2021.
Reflecting compelling scientific evidence on the development of cognitive maturity, the guideline says that a young person will generally have a lower level of maturity, and a greater capacity for change and rehabilitation, than an older person.
For this reason, it states that rehabilitation should be a primary consideration when sentencing a young person.
The Council considers that this will help to achieve one of the guideline’s key aims: to reduce reoffending among young people, and thereby help to increase public safety."
Well intentioned, but sounds like it may lack a bit of sufficient flexibility.
Compare and contrast with the law that 'stirring up hatred' involving prejudice on the basis of age, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or variations in sex characteristics can get you a 7 seven year sentence in Scotland.
Even if not in this case (it will, apparently, be one of the tougher ones) he does appear to have committed some crimes, or at least there is compelling evidence he did in some cases to a level that needs testing.
How to avoid martyring him at some point during those cases?
Not saying he should be immune from prosecution but I still think it martyrs him.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
This is the key section of the Scottish Sentencing Council guidelines for the sentencing of young people (defined elsewhere in the document as those aged under 25 at the time when the offence was committed):
20. The full range of sentencing options remains open to the court. However, the nature and duration of a sentence imposed on a young person should be different from that which might be imposed on an older person being sentenced for the same, or a similar, offence.
21. A custodial sentence should only be imposed on a young person when the court is satisfied that no other sentence is appropriate. If a custodial sentence is imposed on a young person, it should be shorter than that which would have been imposed on an older person for the same, or a similar, offence.
"A new sentencing guideline developed by the Scottish Sentencing Council comes into effect in all courts in Scotland today (Wednesday, 26 January 2022).
The sentencing young people guideline applies to the sentencing of those who are under the age of 25 at the date of their plea of guilty or when a finding of guilt is made against them.
It was developed over an intensive period of stakeholder engagement and research, culminating in a full public consultation in 2020 and its approval by the High Court on 09 November 2021.
Reflecting compelling scientific evidence on the development of cognitive maturity, the guideline says that a young person will generally have a lower level of maturity, and a greater capacity for change and rehabilitation, than an older person.
For this reason, it states that rehabilitation should be a primary consideration when sentencing a young person.
The Council considers that this will help to achieve one of the guideline’s key aims: to reduce reoffending among young people, and thereby help to increase public safety."
Just turned 17? Have a free rape on us. You're in Scotland
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
Yes. The guidance now is that the male brain does not mature until you are 25 ( and you might think that optimistic on some cases) so you are more prone to impulsive behaviour and have poorer judgment. These are mitigating factors. But wow.
But OK to vote at 16, lol.
Or to die in uniform for your country a year later
Compare and contrast with the law that 'stirring up hatred' involving prejudice on the basis of age, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or variations in sex characteristics can get you a 7 seven year sentence in Scotland.
Even if not in this case (it will, apparently, be one of the tougher ones) he does appear to have committed some crimes, or at least there is compelling evidence he did in some cases to a level that needs testing.
How to avoid martyring him at some point during those cases?
Not saying he should be immune from prosecution but I still think it martyrs him.
I agree it does with his audience, it's just frustrating there's not really a way around that - some prosecutions will probably go nowhere, but from what it looks like he's played so fast and loose with rules his whole life how he's avoided it to date is a bigger question.
This judgement implies that you can stranger-rape a 13 year old in a park when you are 24 and even then you would avoid jail, because you are "not really mature enough to know what you are doing", as long as it happens in Scotland
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
Yes. The guidance now is that the male brain does not mature until you are 25 ( and you might think that optimistic on some cases) so you are more prone to impulsive behaviour and have poorer judgment. These are mitigating factors. But wow.
It is very serious. Conviction rates for rape are desultory to start with. If even a successful prosecution results in a sentence such as this then what point is there in victims bothering to report offences?
This judgement implies that you can stranger-rape a 13 year old in a park when you are 24 and even then you would avoid jail, because you are "not really mature enough to know what you are doing", as long as it happens in Scotland
And as long as you're careful not to use any non-inclusive language, of course.
Wait until Karen Adams hears what I said about, inter alia, Liz Truss and Sir Gavin Williamson.
I really don't know why people constantly fall into these kinds of trap. Unless they are misquoting her it wouldn't be hard to suggest he faces racist motivations from some without implying anyone criticising him is doing so unfairly and or in a racism way.
It’s guilt by association as well as an attempt to stifle criticism.
Some of his critics are racist/far right, therefore if you join in criticism of him you’re just as bad.
It applies to a variety of issues. Low traffic neighbourhood and the trans debate among others. Join in the criticism and you’re aligning with bad people.
"A sobbing rapist who attacked a 13-year-old girl in a Midlothian park walked free from court on Monday. Sean Hogg pounced on the girl at Dalkeith Country Park on various occasions between March and June 2018.
"Court papers state Hogg, now 21, threatened his victim and pulled down her lower clothing. Hogg, of Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, then seized her by the wrists and caused the girl to carry out a sex act on him. He then pushed his victim's head down and raped her."
Trump is just a media circus for 24 7 news like GB news and the equally appalling Sky News .au which is obsessed with slagging off Harry and Meghan.....
If we could manage to get a story combining Trump, Meghan, JK Rowling, and Andrew Tate, the internet might just explode.
And Naga Munchetty. Rare is the day she hasn't said or done something worthy of a clickbait article in the Mailiverse.
Not just the Mail. Our local rag, the Chronicle too. Lots of breakfast and daytime TV clickbait and daytime quiz show clickbait.
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
Better if Trump had been arrested in Florida. As I understand it their openness laws mean the public get a lot of info much more quickly, which supposedly why crazy 'Florida Man' stories are more common online than from other states.
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
This is the key section of the Scottish Sentencing Council guidelines for the sentencing of young people (defined elsewhere in the document as those aged under 25 at the time when the offence was committed):
20. The full range of sentencing options remains open to the court. However, the nature and duration of a sentence imposed on a young person should be different from that which might be imposed on an older person being sentenced for the same, or a similar, offence.
21. A custodial sentence should only be imposed on a young person when the court is satisfied that no other sentence is appropriate. If a custodial sentence is imposed on a young person, it should be shorter than that which would have been imposed on an older person for the same, or a similar, offence.
Nothing there that constitutes a blanket excuse of young people from prison. The decision to give him a slap on the wrist is ultimately on the judge.
Agree that this is down to the judge.
Scotland does not have sentencing guidelines for rape as yet. The only relevant guidelines are those for sentencing young people. AIUI, the SNP pushed for this to be defined as offenders aged below 25 and this was accepted by the Sentencing Council for Scotland, despite the majority of respondents to the consultation being against it. But, as Pigeon says, this is down to the judge. The guidelines say that a custodial sentence should only be imposed if no other sentence is appropriate. My view is that this is a case where the judge should have decided that no other sentence is appropriate and sent him to jail.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Isn't it complicated because he was seventeen when the rape(s?) happened?
Yes. The guidance now is that the male brain does not mature until you are 25 ( and you might think that optimistic on some cases) so you are more prone to impulsive behaviour and have poorer judgment. These are mitigating factors. But wow.
But mature enough at 16 to change your gender and start life altering medication…..
Compare and contrast with the law that 'stirring up hatred' involving prejudice on the basis of age, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or variations in sex characteristics can get you a 7 seven year sentence in Scotland.
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
In general we should jail less. It would be pretty absurd if we get to a point of jailing more but for pettier things.
Which means it'll probably happen.
It was ever thus. Property has more value than the person in the justice system. That said, whilst I am completely opposed to capital punishment, I might have to make an exception where smug middle-class preachy twats that glue themselves to roads are concerned
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
Unusual sentence. I'll have to read more about it.
It seems to be a result of sentencing guidelines introduced by the Scottish government for offenders under 25 (the rapist in this case was 17 at the time of the rape, 21 now).
Rapists under the age of 25 won't get prison sentences?
The presumption seems to be that they won't.
What makes this even odder, at least judging by the news reports, is that. mitigating factors aside, there were some pretty strong aggravating factors: the victim was just 13. The judge's remark that if he had been over 25 the sentence would have been 4-5 years imprisonment is itself, on the face of it, odd: surely one would expect a much longer sentence?
Also the report states that he attacked the girl, "on various occasions between March and June 2018." So, repeat offending. It wasn't a one-off aberration.
Judges will sometimes make mistakes and I hope there is scope for the leniency of the sentence to be appealed, though the report only says that the defendant intends to appeal the sentence.
As others have said, it doesn't look to me as if the Sean Hogg sentence has much to do with the SNP, Scotland, or the sentencing guidelines. Rather, it's to do with a slightly bonkers judge, and will be changed on appeal. Ludicrous sentences (both ways) have been known to happen in England, quite frequently.
Meanwhile in England, a conviction for causing a public nuisance - albeit a bloody big nuisance - is enough to be remanded before sentencing, and be told to expect to go down.
Comments
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1643304829387694092
Questioning Humza Yousaf’s competence is ‘racist’, says SNP MP
Karen Adam claims he’d been unfairly criticised because of hi
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/04/04/snp-mp-karen-adam-humza-yousaf-competence-racist/
Wait until Karen Adams hears what I said about, inter alia, Liz Truss and Sir Gavin Williamson.
What I said this morning.
Could Trump end up in prison sooner than we think?
He’s the sort of chap who could insult the judge/dox the jury and end up with a contempt charge.
I think American judiciary have quite strong powers in this regard.
Oh, hang on.
I'm 12 hours early.
https://ryxcommar.com/2023/03/28/chatgpt-as-a-query-engine-on-a-giant-corpus-of-text/
Not on this case at least, but even then.
Lamb to the Slaughter or go down fighting? Because going down fighting could see him going down pretty quickly and unambiguously.
“Sean Hogg raped a 13 year old girl
Judge Lord Lake saw fit to sentence Sean Hogg to:
- No prison time
- 7 weeks community service (unpaid work)
- 3 years on the sex offender registry
Rape in Scotland over the next 10 years will skyrocket because of this case”
https://twitter.com/themaxstoic/status/1643166062475722753?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw
People on Twitter are blaming it on Progressive SNP Judicial Reforms. I have NO idea if this is true
It does seem remarkably lenient
For once British media's cultural cringe in following american news is at least partially justified.
The ones for magistrates in England are so proscriptive that they practically dictate the sentences.
Blimey, being on here this evening is like playing a game of Cards Against Humanity
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-65173054
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-65173054
It does seem excruciatingly unfair on the 13 year old VICTIM. He doesn’t even do a day in jail?
Hey Ho. I don’t know the details so I’ll leave it there
https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/crime/sean-hogg-rapist-who-attacked-13-year-old-girl-in-dalkeith-country-park-walks-free-from-court-4091838
Rape of a 13-year-old girl, unknown to the attacker, in a public park. Seems astonishingly lenient a sentence, given that the attacker was old enough to vote.
How to avoid martyring him at some point during those cases?
What makes this even odder, at least judging by the news reports, is that. mitigating factors aside, there were some pretty strong aggravating factors: the victim was just 13. The judge's remark that if he had been over 25 the sentence would have been 4-5 years imprisonment is itself, on the face of it, odd: surely one would expect a much longer sentence?
20. The full range of sentencing options remains open to the court. However, the nature and duration of a sentence imposed on a young person should be different from that which might be imposed on an older person being sentenced for the same, or a similar, offence.
21. A custodial sentence should only be imposed on a young person when the court is satisfied that no other sentence is appropriate. If a custodial sentence is imposed on a young person, it should be shorter than that which would have been imposed on an older person for the same, or a similar, offence.
https://www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk/media/2171/sentencing-young-people-guideline-for-publication.pdf
Nothing there that constitutes a blanket excuse of young people from prison. The decision to give him a slap on the wrist is ultimately on the judge.
"A new sentencing guideline developed by the Scottish Sentencing Council comes into effect in all courts in Scotland today (Wednesday, 26 January 2022).
The sentencing young people guideline applies to the sentencing of those who are under the age of 25 at the date of their plea of guilty or when a finding of guilt is made against them.
It was developed over an intensive period of stakeholder engagement and research, culminating in a full public consultation in 2020 and its approval by the High Court on 09 November 2021.
Reflecting compelling scientific evidence on the development of cognitive maturity, the guideline says that a young person will generally have a lower level of maturity, and a greater capacity for change and rehabilitation, than an older person.
For this reason, it states that rehabilitation should be a primary consideration when sentencing a young person.
The Council considers that this will help to achieve one of the guideline’s key aims: to reduce reoffending among young people, and thereby help to increase public safety."
They've gone raving bonkers, haven't they?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-56364821
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23434828.yousaf-says-understands-concerns-rapist-hogg-avoids-jail/
You enemy of Planet Earth.
Some of his critics are racist/far right, therefore if you join in criticism of him you’re just as bad.
It applies to a variety of issues. Low traffic neighbourhood and the trans debate among others. Join in the criticism and you’re aligning with bad people.
"A sobbing rapist who attacked a 13-year-old girl in a Midlothian park walked free from court on Monday. Sean Hogg pounced on the girl at Dalkeith Country Park on various occasions between March and June 2018.
"Court papers state Hogg, now 21, threatened his victim and pulled down her lower clothing. Hogg, of Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, then seized her by the wrists and caused the girl to carry out a sex act on him. He then pushed his victim's head down and raped her."
Mind you sometimes we see some local news too.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11937665/Moment-Just-Stop-Oil-eco-zealot-sings-protest-song-police-hauled-Dartford-Crossing.html
Which means it'll probably happen.
Sounds like Rishi Sunak is pressing ahead with plans to change the definition of sex in the Equality Act to biological sex
Source close to Sunak says he 'remains committed to his campaign pledge' and he will support Badenoch in 'taking that work forward'
https://twitter.com/steven_swinford/status/1643277177843007490
Scotland does not have sentencing guidelines for rape as yet. The only relevant guidelines are those for sentencing young people. AIUI, the SNP pushed for this to be defined as offenders aged below 25 and this was accepted by the Sentencing Council for Scotland, despite the majority of respondents to the consultation being against it. But, as Pigeon says, this is down to the judge. The guidelines say that a custodial sentence should only be imposed if no other sentence is appropriate. My view is that this is a case where the judge should have decided that no other sentence is appropriate and sent him to jail.
The levels of crucifixion and impalement are shockingly low.
Judges will sometimes make mistakes and I hope there is scope for the leniency of the sentence to be appealed, though the report only says that the defendant intends to appeal the sentence.
Ludicrous sentences (both ways) have been known to happen in England, quite frequently.