Nikki Haley at 17/1 looks value for the WH2024 GOP nomination – politicalbetting.com
We are getting to that time when possible contenders for next year’s White House race start putting there hats into the ring and indicating that they might be making a formal bid for the nomination of their parties.
Nikki Haley has about as much chance of being the next Republican Presidential nominee as Jeremy Hunt has of being the next Tory leader.
She is way too moderate for Trumpite white working class Republicans and evangelicals alike. The 2024 nomination battle will be between Trump and DeSantis with an outside chance for Pence still if he wins the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses
Is it really a mystery why Sunak and some other politicians want it to be seen as an acceptable "mistake" to cheat to the tune of several millions on your taxes?
I mentioned this yesterday but I remain confounded as to why Lens, 3 points off PSG and backable at 26 (29 with boost), have those title odds.
I'd still say, from my very vague understanding, that PSG are favourites, but it's 3 points and the halfway mark in the season. Contrast La Liga, Real Madrid are 3 points off Barcelona and 2.87 for the title. Name recognition? Real Sociedad are 3 points further back (but have a game in hand) and 201 for the title... free bet, if you've got one, perhaps.
25/1 Skybet; 20/1 Betfred and a couple of others, according to Oddschecker.
But (there is always a but) OGH may see this as a trading bet and thus wants to be able to lay off when the price contracts without tying up yet more money (or might just be banned by the books).
I mentioned this yesterday but I remain confounded as to why Lens, 3 points off PSG and backable at 26 (29 with boost), have those title odds.
I'd still say, from my very vague understanding, that PSG are favourites, but it's 3 points and the halfway mark in the season. Contrast La Liga, Real Madrid are 3 points off Barcelona and 2.87 for the title. Name recognition? Real Sociedad are 3 points further back (but have a game in hand) and 201 for the title... free bet, if you've got one, perhaps.
Were Leicester not still something mad like 60/1 to win the title at Christmas, when they were several points clear of the field?
25/1, for the team 3 points off the lead in January, seems like a good bet to me. Especially if you can get an each-way.
Mr. Sandpit, each way is sadly unavailable but I still think it's worth backing (and 28/1 with boost).
From memory, Ligue 1 had the least competitive title market pre-season (Serie A was perhaps the best, then the EPL, with Bundesliga and Ligue 1 having very clear favourites). Suspect this may have some effect on the current market, perhaps. First season trying to bet fairly seriously (low stakes, but trying to get a decent rate of success) on football, so not sure.
I mentioned this yesterday but I remain confounded as to why Lens, 3 points off PSG and backable at 26 (29 with boost), have those title odds.
I'd still say, from my very vague understanding, that PSG are favourites, but it's 3 points and the halfway mark in the season. Contrast La Liga, Real Madrid are 3 points off Barcelona and 2.87 for the title. Name recognition? Real Sociedad are 3 points further back (but have a game in hand) and 201 for the title... free bet, if you've got one, perhaps.
PSG are 1/50. That is why you can have any price you like about their rivals.
Nikki Haley has about as much chance of being the next Republican Presidential nominee as Jeremy Hunt has of being the next Tory leader.
She is way too moderate for Trumpite white working class Republicans and evangelicals alike. The 2024 nomination battle will be between Trump and DeSantis with an outside chance for Pence still if he wins the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses
the only other thing worth pointing out is because both Trump and DeSantis come from Florida Trump can't offer DeSantis the "opportunity" to be his VP.
I don't see how anyone else becomes Republican nominee when all the other contenders are so scared of Trump's support that they are unable to criticise him.
Who among them can make the case that Trump lost the 2020 election and that's why they need a new candidate, and win that argument with Republican primary voters?
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
And actually, to credit Boris: not only was he very strong on Ukraine before and after the war began, but he's continued that interest after he stopped being PM. He did not need to go to Ukraine this week, and you can be sure as heck that he'll be carrying messages from the government. He won't gain a great deal of domestic credit for doing it, either.
Mr. JohnL, hmm, Betfair has PSG at 1.12 for the title.
Please use the quote button so that others can easily see the whole exchange.
Given the differences of opinion as to whether PSG should be 1/10 or 1/100 for the title, perhaps that is where the value lies. Since few take Ligue 1 seriously as a betting proposition (look how far down it is buried on most sites) it is quite possible someone has got it wrong about a team whose forward line is Mbappe, Neymar and Messi. I shan't be playing.
Sunak has shown that he will come totally unstuck in any GE campaign
but who else does the Tory party have as a suitable candidate who doesn't have a nasty smell hidden in their wardrobe and wouldn't be an embarrassment on the campaign trail.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
Nikki Haley has about as much chance of being the next Republican Presidential nominee as Jeremy Hunt has of being the next Tory leader.
She is way too moderate for Trumpite white working class Republicans and evangelicals alike. The 2024 nomination battle will be between Trump and DeSantis with an outside chance for Pence still if he wins the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses
the only other thing worth pointing out is because both Trump and DeSantis come from Florida Trump can't offer DeSantis the "opportunity" to be his VP.
Haley has a chance of being the nominee's running mate, she has nearly zero chance of actually being the nominee
What I consider 'the part' and what Republican members consider 'the part' probably aren't very similar so I'll stay out of guessing on this one. I don't doubt OGH's track record on this sort of thing though. I assume everything went well with the op yesterday?
Spain and Norway now joining the growing list of countries thought to be about to announce they are sending Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine.
If the announcements come today it will only be 11 days since the British announcement on sending Challenger 2 tanks.
And credit to @kamski , who took a fair amount of flak, but was correct in predicting Scholz would finally agree.
I note it's reported the US tanks (30 plus) will not be from military stocks, but ordered from the manufacturer. So Germany gets its political cover, and Ukraine won't have to deal with two sets of very complicated logistics this year.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
For all those little shits who think this is somehow Ukraine's fault, that the west 'poked' Russia into it, that this is anything other than Russian imperialism.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
64% of Republican Iowa Caucus goers in 2016 were evangelical Christians and Iowa is still the first Republican state to vote for their nominee. In 2016 they voted for Baptist Cruz not Trump
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
And actually, to credit Boris: not only was he very strong on Ukraine before and after the war began, but he's continued that interest after he stopped being PM. He did not need to go to Ukraine this week, and you can be sure as heck that he'll be carrying messages from the government. He won't gain a great deal of domestic credit for doing it, either.
I suspect he’s exhausted, virtually all his public credit in UK, and wonder if he’s running out of that “at home “?
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
And actually, to credit Boris: not only was he very strong on Ukraine before and after the war began, but he's continued that interest after he stopped being PM. He did not need to go to Ukraine this week, and you can be sure as heck that he'll be carrying messages from the government. He won't gain a great deal of domestic credit for doing it, either.
I suspect he’s exhausted, virtually all his public credit in UK, and wonder if he’s running out of that “at home “?
Reinforcing success - if the Ukraine war ends well for Ukraine, It will be a big part of what is considered his legacy.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
64% of Republican Iowa Caucus goers in 2016 were evangelical Christians and Iowa is still the first Republican state to vote for their nominee. In 2016 they voted for Baptist Cruz not Trump
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Ron DeSantis -£446.22 Joe Biden £959.21 Kamala Harris £152.96 Gavin Newsom -£868.34 Mike Pence -£963.20 Michelle Obama -£482.64 Hillary Clinton -£457.84 Tulsi Gabbard -£927.44 Dwayne Johnson -£956.84 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez -£767.84 Liz Cheney -£948.54 Nikki Haley & everyone else including the Donald. £139.32
Betfair tells me this is worth -£6.71 to cash out at the moment.
I'd pay you much more than that for it. Nice book, only real risk is DeSantis (maybe Newsom if Biden steps down but it could just as easily be 10 other Dems in that scenario) and your implied odds are tasty.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
Ron DeSantis -£446.22 Joe Biden £959.21 Kamala Harris £152.96 Gavin Newsom -£868.34 Mike Pence -£963.20 Michelle Obama -£482.64 Hillary Clinton -£457.84 Tulsi Gabbard -£927.44 Dwayne Johnson -£956.84 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez -£767.84 Liz Cheney -£948.54 Nikki Haley & everyone else including the Donald. £139.32
Betfair tells me this is worth -£6.71 to cash out at the moment.
I'd pay you much more than that for it. Nice book, only real risk is DeSantis (maybe Newsom if Biden steps down but it could just as easily be 10 other Dems in that scenario) and your implied odds are tasty.
Yeah a small negative on the cashout generally means it's in the black due to liquidity.
I've also got Biden for the nom at Smarkets at around 2-1. Those docs are a bigger worry than his age! but with Pence story coming out it could end up like MP's expenses.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pence is even more hardline on abortion than Trump though
"Our military pilots traveled to the US. The type of aircraft that will probably be provided to 🇺🇦 and the corresponding terms for pilot training have already been determined," - Yuriy Ignat, speaker of the Ukrainian Air Force.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
64% of Republican Iowa Caucus goers in 2016 were evangelical Christians and Iowa is still the first Republican state to vote for their nominee. In 2016 they voted for Baptist Cruz not Trump
Haley converted. She's also not a charisma free weirdo.
Haley backs a 20 week abortion limit, which is softer than DeSantis and Trump let alone Pence who essentially wants to end abortion completely as most evangelicals do
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
And actually, to credit Boris: not only was he very strong on Ukraine before and after the war began, but he's continued that interest after he stopped being PM. He did not need to go to Ukraine this week, and you can be sure as heck that he'll be carrying messages from the government. He won't gain a great deal of domestic credit for doing it, either.
I suspect he’s exhausted, virtually all his public credit in UK, and wonder if he’s running out of that “at home “?
Reinforcing success - if the Ukraine war ends well for Ukraine, It will be a big part of what is considered his legacy.
And if the war ends in nuclear Armageddon, none of the survivors will care about his legacy. Win-win.
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
Ron DeSantis -£446.22 Joe Biden £959.21 Kamala Harris £152.96 Gavin Newsom -£868.34 Mike Pence -£963.20 Michelle Obama -£482.64 Hillary Clinton -£457.84 Tulsi Gabbard -£927.44 Dwayne Johnson -£956.84 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez -£767.84 Liz Cheney -£948.54 Nikki Haley & everyone else including the Donald. £139.32
Betfair tells me this is worth -£6.71 to cash out at the moment.
I'd pay you much more than that for it. Nice book, only real risk is DeSantis (maybe Newsom if Biden steps down but it could just as easily be 10 other Dems in that scenario) and your implied odds are tasty.
Yeah a small negative on the cashout generally means it's in the black due to liquidity.
I've also got Biden for the nom at Smarkets at around 2-1. Those docs are a bigger worry than his age! but with Pence story coming out it could end up like MP's expenses.
Given the unlimited proliferation of classified documents, it's a fair bet that most presidents and VPs have carelessly hung on to a few without necessarily realising. The Trump case is very different - the deliberate removal of thousands of documents, some highly classified, from the WH, and a subsequent saga of deliberate lies and obstruction lasting years.
The Biden and Pence cases seriously muddy the water, but perhaps insufficiently to save Trump from the consequences of his actions.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Indeed, which is why the OneWeb and other launches for competitors are partly clever politics for SpaceX.
SpaceX has repeatedly launched, now, competitors in the LEO data provision space to Starlink. At prices that are equal to those they've charged for other launches.
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
AI could probably come up with the solutions to Britain's woes within about 5 minutes, but politicians wouldn't dare implement the required measures.
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
AI potentially leads to mass unemployment
Wouldn't it just cancel out the acute labour shortages? And let us retire at 60?
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
It doesn't sound like the trammies experiment is going well.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pope Benedict said protestants can't have churches in 2007!
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
64% of Republican Iowa Caucus goers in 2016 were evangelical Christians and Iowa is still the first Republican state to vote for their nominee. In 2016 they voted for Baptist Cruz not Trump
Haley converted. She's also not a charisma free weirdo.
Haley backs a 20 week abortion limit, which is softer than DeSantis and Trump let alone Pence who essentially wants to end abortion completely as most evangelicals do
Abortion is a large part of the Republicans losing the midterms. As we saw with Trump, the religious right are quite capable of voting for the candidate they think will win, rather than the fellow evangelical. Pence is certainly not the former; Haley is at the very least a 5% chance to be so.
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
It doesn't sound like the trammies experiment is going well.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pence is even more hardline on abortion than Trump though
God carries out His own abortions - He just calls them "miscarriage".
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
AI potentially leads to mass unemployment
Wouldn't it just cancel out the acute labour shortages? And let us retire at 60?
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
Oh good. I was getting worried we my be in some trouble. Applying the law of Leonadamus looks like things will be fine.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
In my line of work, Apple’s abuse of the patent system and relentless theft of other people’s IP mean it is truly hated by innovative SMEs and individual inventors, which lack the resources to fight back.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
In my line of work, Apple’s abuse of the patent system and relentless theft of other people’s IP mean it is truly hated by innovative SMEs and individual inventors, which lack the resources to fight back.
Ooh okay, that’s a new angle I’ve not heard before. They’re stealing publishing IP?
‘Incredibly concerning’: Bird flu outbreak at Spanish mink farm triggers pandemic fears Spread among captive mink could give the H5N1 strain opportunities to evolve and adapt to mammals https://www.science.org/content/article/incredibly-concerning-bird-flu-outbreak-spanish-mink-farm-triggers-pandemic-fears ...But the episode, described in a paper in Eurosurveillance last week, has reignited long-smoldering fears that H5N1 could trigger a human pandemic. The virus is not known to spread well between mammals; people almost always catch it from infected birds, not one another. But now, H5N1 appears to have spread through a densely packed mammalian population and gained at least one mutation that favors mammal-to-mammal spread....
Forget animal rights; Europe should ban mink farming on public health grounds. Mammalian serial passage in a biohazard level zero facility.
‘Incredibly concerning’: Bird flu outbreak at Spanish mink farm triggers pandemic fears Spread among captive mink could give the H5N1 strain opportunities to evolve and adapt to mammals https://www.science.org/content/article/incredibly-concerning-bird-flu-outbreak-spanish-mink-farm-triggers-pandemic-fears ...But the episode, described in a paper in Eurosurveillance last week, has reignited long-smoldering fears that H5N1 could trigger a human pandemic. The virus is not known to spread well between mammals; people almost always catch it from infected birds, not one another. But now, H5N1 appears to have spread through a densely packed mammalian population and gained at least one mutation that favors mammal-to-mammal spread....
Forget animal rights; Europe should ban mink farming on public health grounds. Mammalian serial passage in a biohazard level zero facility.
Gaia is really upping its immunoresponse to the human virus right now.
Whoever the Republican candidate is US commitment to NATO is likely to become a big issue once more. That means Europe may well have only two years to gets its defence act together. It almost certainly won’t. That means Putin just has to hold on for two years. He almost certainly will. Our complacent dependence on the US is weak, cowardly and entirely self-defeating.
The Germans are the punchbag and their lack of action over Ukraine has been appalling. But the failure to plan for a GOP president in 2025, with all that implies for Europe’s defence, is a collective one. It’s moral and political cowardice. A total abdication of responsibility. A disaster in the making.
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
Why do you say that? The era of near zero interest rates appears to be over. There may have been a commodity price shock after the start of the war but prices have come down again. We might even get a reasonable correction in the housing market.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
In my line of work, Apple’s abuse of the patent system and relentless theft of other people’s IP mean it is truly hated by innovative SMEs and individual inventors, which lack the resources to fight back.
Ooh okay, that’s a new angle I’ve not heard before. They’re stealing publishing IP?
Patent theft (of tech) happened in the case I'm thinking of, which I cannot talk about.
But as a CEO said to me: "How can we win? Apple have more lawyers than we have engineers."
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
64% of Republican Iowa Caucus goers in 2016 were evangelical Christians and Iowa is still the first Republican state to vote for their nominee. In 2016 they voted for Baptist Cruz not Trump
Haley converted. She's also not a charisma free weirdo.
Haley backs a 20 week abortion limit, which is softer than DeSantis and Trump let alone Pence who essentially wants to end abortion completely as most evangelicals do
Abortion is a large part of the Republicans losing the midterms. As we saw with Trump, the religious right are quite capable of voting for the candidate they think will win, rather than the fellow evangelical. Pence is certainly not the former; Haley is at the very least a 5% chance to be so.
Not really, it was Trumpite and anti abortion candidates winning key Senate and Governorship primaries that cost the GOP the Senate and key governors' races
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pope Benedict said protestants can't have churches in 2007!
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Same with computers. Tablets.
Oh indeed, but that in itself doesn’t give them a seat at the evil top table.
Throwing lawyers at small, innovative, companies, is a different matter though. That’s heading towards evil.
Spain and Norway now joining the growing list of countries thought to be about to announce they are sending Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine.
If the announcements come today it will only be 11 days since the British announcement on sending Challenger 2 tanks.
And credit to @kamski , who took a fair amount of flak, but was correct in predicting Scholz would finally agree.
I note it's reported the US tanks (30 plus) will not be from military stocks, but ordered from the manufacturer. So Germany gets its political cover, and Ukraine won't have to deal with two sets of very complicated logistics this year.
Yes I guess it's a certainty that there will be Leopard tanks in Ukraine long before there are Abrams tanks. Which is why I suggested last week that the German government stating there was no requirement for US and German tanks to be "delivered" simultaneously, was a slightly ambiguous way of keeping their options open, rather than a complete contradiction of all the earlier indications that Germany wouldn't send tanks without a commitment from the US to send tanks too.
Scholz will probably now argue (at least to his coalition partners and critics within government) that his approach was the right one, if he has ensured a US commitment to tanks, and avoided what he would say was a potentially dangerous uncoupling of US and German/European support for Ukraine.
"Germany confirms it will send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine The German government has just confirmed that the decision to send 14 Leopard tanks to Ukraine was announced by Chancellor Scholz at a cabinet meeting this morning.
Germany will also approve the export of Leopards by third countries."
Britain is completely fucked on almost every metric. We are entering a two decade spiral of inexorable decline - some might argue it is a mere continuation of the previous 15 years
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
I would argue it's a mere continuation of the previous 15 years.
Spain and Norway now joining the growing list of countries thought to be about to announce they are sending Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine.
If the announcements come today it will only be 11 days since the British announcement on sending Challenger 2 tanks.
And credit to @kamski , who took a fair amount of flak, but was correct in predicting Scholz would finally agree.
I note it's reported the US tanks (30 plus) will not be from military stocks, but ordered from the manufacturer. So Germany gets its political cover, and Ukraine won't have to deal with two sets of very complicated logistics this year.
Yes I guess it's a certainty that there will be Leopard tanks in Ukraine long before there are Abrams tanks. Which is why I suggested last week that the German government stating there was no requirement for US and German tanks to be "delivered" simultaneously, was a slightly ambiguous way of keeping their options open, rather than a complete contradiction of all the earlier indications that Germany wouldn't send tanks without a commitment from the US to send tanks too.
Scholz will probably now argue (at least to his coalition partners and critics within government) that his approach was the right one, if he has ensured a US commitment to tanks, and avoided what he would say was a potentially dangerous uncoupling of US and German/European support for Ukraine.
Yes. Scholz and Germany give every impression of being utterly beholden to the USA for European security, unwilling or unable to do anything without Uncle Sam joining in.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pope Benedict said protestants can't have churches in 2007!
For hardline Roman Catholics Protestants are just as much heretics as atheists and non Christian religions
Not quite bro. The RC Catechism - the most recent 'Official' one says this:
"Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptised (BTW this means by anyone at all with water invoking the trinity) are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the (Roman) Catholic Church".
"Our military pilots traveled to the US. The type of aircraft that will probably be provided to 🇺🇦 and the corresponding terms for pilot training have already been determined," - Yuriy Ignat, speaker of the Ukrainian Air Force.
Apple moreso than Meta, Alphabet or Amazon has essentially created a modern day cult religion. Their share of the phone market in the USA is astonishing.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Same with computers. Tablets.
The LVMH of computing.
True to an extent - they made their products into a combination of luxury good *and* good technology.
The M series chips are game changers for instance.
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Same with computers. Tablets.
The LVMH of computing.
True to an extent - they made their products into a combination of luxury good *and* good technology.
The M series chips are game changers for instance.
Yes, I'm getting an 14" M2 Pro today to replace my ageing 13" i7, I'm very excited.
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1. More chance than Pence.
Pence has a chance in the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses at least, being an evangelical himself unlike Trump and Roman Catholic DeSantis. If he won that then that would make him a contender as it did Cruz in 2016, Santorum in 2012 and Huckabee in 2008 and Bush in 2000.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
I note your views.
Pence has very little widespread support - he was considered a bit of dunce, even by the evangelicals. He's hated by the Trumpets, the anti-Trumpets don't want his brand of ultra-religious right stuff.
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
During my brief dalliance with evangelical Christianity many, many years ago, I was told that Roman Catholics were not Christians. One of the reasons the dalliance was brief!
That's rather common in religions - Religion X : variant A states the variant B isn't of religion X
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
Pope Benedict said protestants can't have churches in 2007!
For hardline Roman Catholics Protestants are just as much heretics as atheists and non Christian religions
Not quite bro. The RC Catechism - the most recent 'Official' one says this:
"Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptised (BTW this means by anyone at all with water invoking the trinity) are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the (Roman) Catholic Church".
Imperfect being the key word there.
Plus that is under the current more liberal Pope Francis.
Many hardliners and traditionalist supporters of the late Pope Benedict and those who disagree with Vatican II would not even agree with that
Unless they can grind it out in the courts, and get a second Trump administration to abandon this anti-trust suit, Google look as though they're facing some very serious penalties. The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Microsoft was only saved from breakup by Apple resurrecting themselves.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
There’s a lot of anti-trust stuff going on in the US at the moment. Google, Facebook, Ticketmaster and others under scrutiny, with cross-party support for serious action against these monopolistic practices.
Apple needs to be broken up. They're really bad for the industry, and are bad actors within it.
The way I look at the hierarchy of tech giants, is to see who’s complaining about them.
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
What is unusual about Apple is the their market share is small in each area, but they have captured the vast majority of the high sales, where the big profits are.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Same with computers. Tablets.
The LVMH of computing.
True to an extent - they made their products into a combination of luxury good *and* good technology.
The M series chips are game changers for instance.
I'd argue (with some vehemence) that the M series chips are the *first* time Apple have knocked tech out of the park. They're brilliantly good, and far better than rivals, or even ARM's reference jobbies (which to be fair, are for other purposes).
Spain and Norway now joining the growing list of countries thought to be about to announce they are sending Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine.
If the announcements come today it will only be 11 days since the British announcement on sending Challenger 2 tanks.
And credit to @kamski , who took a fair amount of flak, but was correct in predicting Scholz would finally agree.
I note it's reported the US tanks (30 plus) will not be from military stocks, but ordered from the manufacturer. So Germany gets its political cover, and Ukraine won't have to deal with two sets of very complicated logistics this year.
Yes I guess it's a certainty that there will be Leopard tanks in Ukraine long before there are Abrams tanks. Which is why I suggested last week that the German government stating there was no requirement for US and German tanks to be "delivered" simultaneously, was a slightly ambiguous way of keeping their options open, rather than a complete contradiction of all the earlier indications that Germany wouldn't send tanks without a commitment from the US to send tanks too.
Scholz will probably now argue (at least to his coalition partners and critics within government) that his approach was the right one, if he has ensured a US commitment to tanks, and avoided what he would say was a potentially dangerous uncoupling of US and German/European support for Ukraine.
Yes. Scholz and Germany give every impression of being utterly beholden to the USA for European security, unwilling or unable to do anything without Uncle Sam joining in.
'Germany needs to send Leopards RIGHT NOW!'
Germany sends Leopards.
'They're doing it for all the wrong reasons.'
As predictable as Tory tax dodgers and BJ getting us to pay for his away days to Kiev..
Apple moreso than Meta, Alphabet or Amazon has essentially created a modern day cult religion. Their share of the phone market in the USA is astonishing.
Apple moreso than Meta, Alphabet or Amazon has essentially created a modern day cult religion. Their share of the phone market in the USA is astonishing.
It's worth noting that Apple's best selling phones tend to be either the very top end of the range or the bottom. Fewer and fewer are buying the standard phones now.
"Our military pilots traveled to the US. The type of aircraft that will probably be provided to 🇺🇦 and the corresponding terms for pilot training have already been determined," - Yuriy Ignat, speaker of the Ukrainian Air Force.
It's interesting that he said 'type', singular. I guess it'll be a case of the following criteria fighting each other: *) What's available in enough numbers. *) What UA pilots and ground crew can be trained on quickly. *) What is good enough to make a real difference. *) What price the US is willing to pay.
It'd be 'interesting' for them to get F16, and fly out of Poland (as Poland already has maintenance experience on F16's). After all, Russia attack from Belarussia...
Comments
She is way too moderate for Trumpite white working class Republicans and evangelicals alike. The 2024 nomination battle will be between Trump and DeSantis with an outside chance for Pence still if he wins the evangelical dominated Iowa caucuses
I'd still say, from my very vague understanding, that PSG are favourites, but it's 3 points and the halfway mark in the season. Contrast La Liga, Real Madrid are 3 points off Barcelona and 2.87 for the title. Name recognition? Real Sociedad are 3 points further back (but have a game in hand) and 201 for the title... free bet, if you've got one, perhaps.
But (there is always a but) OGH may see this as a trading bet and thus wants to be able to lay off when the price contracts without tying up yet more money (or might just be banned by the books).
25/1, for the team 3 points off the lead in January, seems like a good bet to me. Especially if you can get an each-way.
From memory, Ligue 1 had the least competitive title market pre-season (Serie A was perhaps the best, then the EPL, with Bundesliga and Ligue 1 having very clear favourites). Suspect this may have some effect on the current market, perhaps. First season trying to bet fairly seriously (low stakes, but trying to get a decent rate of success) on football, so not sure.
The way even a hat can become part of a PR scheme:
https://twitter.com/AKamyshin/status/1618172049423495170
I agree with Mike; worth a trading bet at 17/1.
More chance than Pence.
Who among them can make the case that Trump lost the 2020 election and that's why they need a new candidate, and win that argument with Republican primary voters?
I’ll take a bet that the London Underground hat is going to go on a long tour of Ukraine, and be photographed next to every station and landmark they can find.
Well done Boris! A fun story, making lives of people in a sh!tty situation, that little bit better.
Given the differences of opinion as to whether PSG should be 1/10 or 1/100 for the title, perhaps that is where the value lies. Since few take Ligue 1 seriously as a betting proposition (look how far down it is buried on most sites) it is quite possible someone has got it wrong about a team whose forward line is Mbappe, Neymar and Messi. I shan't be playing.
If the announcements come today it will only be 11 days since the British announcement on sending Challenger 2 tanks.
Haley has no chance in Iowa or NH and probably not even her home state of South Carolina
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/25/microsoft-investigating-teams-and-outlook-outage-as-users-report-issues.html
Happy WFH on Burns Night Day.
I note it's reported the US tanks (30 plus) will not be from military stocks, but ordered from the manufacturer.
So Germany gets its political cover, and Ukraine won't have to deal with two sets of very complicated logistics this year.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-64397643
The first Russian terrorist mass missile attack on Mariupol. 31 people died, 117 were injured.
https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1617915233326231552
For all those little shits who think this is somehow Ukraine's fault, that the west 'poked' Russia into it, that this is anything other than Russian imperialism.
https://twitter.com/MSFT365Status/status/1618178407316987905
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0202/The-two-numbers-that-explain-Iowa-caucus-vote
American political religion is a strange one - plenty of evangelicals will happily vote for a hard core Catholic, these days.
The detail in the linked thread is impressive.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1618029720599408643
ok, let's do this. I've now read all 153 pages of United States vs Google filed earlier today. As I've said earlier, Google is royally screwed.
The suit is super well-written building on prior work investigating Google’s market power abuse leveraging advertising technologies. ...
Ron DeSantis
-£446.22
Joe Biden
£959.21
Kamala Harris
£152.96
Gavin Newsom
-£868.34
Mike Pence
-£963.20
Michelle Obama
-£482.64
Hillary Clinton
-£457.84
Tulsi Gabbard
-£927.44
Dwayne Johnson
-£956.84
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
-£767.84
Liz Cheney
-£948.54
Nikki Haley & everyone else including the Donald.
£139.32
Betfair tells me this is worth -£6.71 to cash out at the moment.
Not sure that Google won't be facing the same thing.
She's also not a charisma free weirdo.
During the Wars of Religion, quite a few Catholics said that Protestants weren't Christians, IIRC. Some Protestants claimed that the Catholic Church was so corrupt, that it was really devil worship.
Same thing in Islam.
In American Religious politics, the who "culture war" + abortion thing has become a meeting ground. The litmus test is how hard core on those issues the politician is, not so much their denomination.
Much of the remaining support for Trump is because he delivered all the judges (and more) that he promised. Overturning Roe vs Wade was *the* victory these people wanted.
I've also got Biden for the nom at Smarkets at around 2-1. Those docs are a bigger worry than his age! but with Pence story coming out it could end up like MP's expenses.
"Our military pilots traveled to the US. The type of aircraft that will probably be provided to 🇺🇦 and the corresponding terms for pilot training have already been determined," - Yuriy Ignat, speaker of the Ukrainian Air Force.
https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1617868545731465217
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/06/24/pence-we-must-not-rest-until-abortion-is-outlawed-in-every-state-00042315
Maybe AI can save us. Let’s hope so. Because our politicians sure as hell don’t have a clue. We risk becoming a mix of Italy and Argentina but with worse migration problems and less sun. So, worse
The Trump case is very different - the deliberate removal of thousands of documents, some highly classified, from the WH, and a subsequent saga of deliberate lies and obstruction lasting years.
The Biden and Pence cases seriously muddy the water, but perhaps insufficiently to save Trump from the consequences of his actions.
SpaceX has repeatedly launched, now, competitors in the LEO data provision space to Starlink. At prices that are equal to those they've charged for other launches.
Which shuts down charges of monopoly abuse.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jul/11/catholicism.religion
As we saw with Trump, the religious right are quite capable of voting for the candidate they think will win, rather than the fellow evangelical.
Pence is certainly not the former; Haley is at the very least a 5% chance to be so.
Might take 9 tonight
Most of the people complaining about Apple, are large multinational corporations worried that Apple is eating into their profit margins.
Sure, they’re a big company, but there’s a lot more companies well ahead of them in the evil stakes. First, look at the companies where those complaining are mostly small businesses and individuals.
The next few years will certainly be pretty grim, but what happens then isn't yet written.
‘Incredibly concerning’: Bird flu outbreak at Spanish mink farm triggers pandemic fears
Spread among captive mink could give the H5N1 strain opportunities to evolve and adapt to mammals
https://www.science.org/content/article/incredibly-concerning-bird-flu-outbreak-spanish-mink-farm-triggers-pandemic-fears
...But the episode, described in a paper in Eurosurveillance last week, has reignited long-smoldering fears that H5N1 could trigger a human pandemic. The virus is not known to spread well between mammals; people almost always catch it from infected birds, not one another. But now, H5N1 appears to have spread through a densely packed mammalian population and gained at least one mutation that favors mammal-to-mammal spread....
Forget animal rights; Europe should ban mink farming on public health grounds.
Mammalian serial passage in a biohazard level zero facility.
*well, within an easy typo, anyway
The Germans are the punchbag and their lack of action over Ukraine has been appalling. But the failure to plan for a GOP president in 2025, with all that implies for Europe’s defence, is a collective one. It’s moral and political cowardice. A total abdication of responsibility. A disaster in the making.
But as a CEO said to me: "How can we win? Apple have more lawyers than we have engineers."
Which, by a roundabout route, led to this:
http://www.fosspatents.com/2018/12/qualcomm-wins-envelope-tracker-patent_78.html
and I believe this:
https://9to5mac.com/2022/06/27/apple-vs-qualcomm-battle-over/
But it's a long story.
Sure, a zillion non-Apple phones are sold. But iPhone takes most of the profit in that market.
Same with computers. Tablets.
Throwing lawyers at small, innovative, companies, is a different matter though. That’s heading towards evil.
Scholz will probably now argue (at least to his coalition partners and critics within government) that his approach was the right one, if he has ensured a US commitment to tanks, and avoided what he would say was a potentially dangerous uncoupling of US and German/European support for Ukraine.
The German government has just confirmed that the decision to send 14 Leopard tanks to Ukraine was announced by Chancellor Scholz at a cabinet meeting this morning.
Germany will also approve the export of Leopards by third countries."
Huzzah!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-europe-64396659
"Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptised (BTW this means by anyone at all with water invoking the trinity) are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the (Roman) Catholic Church".
Arizona: F-16
Oregon: F-15C
North Carolina: F-15E
California/Virginia: F/A-18
Arkansas: C-130
Florida: U-28 (fucking LOL)
Nevada: Su-27 (wildcard)
The M series chips are game changers for instance.
Plus that is under the current more liberal Pope Francis.
Many hardliners and traditionalist supporters of the late Pope Benedict and those who disagree with Vatican II would not even agree with that
Germany sends Leopards.
'They're doing it for all the wrong reasons.'
As predictable as Tory tax dodgers and BJ getting us to pay for his away days to Kiev..
https://www.counterpointresearch.com/us-market-smartphone-share/
*) What's available in enough numbers.
*) What UA pilots and ground crew can be trained on quickly.
*) What is good enough to make a real difference.
*) What price the US is willing to pay.
It'd be 'interesting' for them to get F16, and fly out of Poland (as Poland already has maintenance experience on F16's). After all, Russia attack from Belarussia...