Thank you Mike. These are extraordinary times. Until the weekend I wasn't entirely convinced that Truss would go.
I think the tory brand is trashed. I guess the hope is that they replace her with some stabilising and sensible person to limit their now inevitable losses at the election. If they can survive with say 100-150 MPs intact from here they will have done well. 200 would be dreamland. As things currently stand they face a Canada-style wipeout. And be in doubt, there's enough anger out there to deliver just that.
There's talk today of heading for an election. Although it is what the country needs to clear the air with a fresh start, I can't see how that can come about. Or are there enough tory MPs prepared to do the decent thing and effectively sign their own death warrants? Might one faction or another throw their toys out the pram and vote down the Government?
"The chancellor Jeremy Hunt will make a statement later today where he is expected to set out how the government will pay for the plans set out in the mini-budget.
He will bring forward "measures from the Medium-Term Fiscal Plan", in a statement in the House of Commons.
The chancellor and Prime Minister Liz Truss have been speaking over the weekend following her announcement of a U-turn on corporation tax on Friday. It also follows the sacking of Hunt's predecessor Kwasi Kwarteng on the same day.
The full details of the Medium-Term Fiscal Plan are due to be released on 31 October."
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
It may look as if Hunt is in charge, and he is certainly going to come over as incredibly powerful, Liz Truss is well used to U-turns so from her point of view this is just another flip-flop day.
The key question is - is that because traders like what Hunt is saying? Because they’re pricing in an imminent Truss departure, or because they anticipate higher interest rates after Baileys comments?
If the latter, bond yields may well rise further, which is probably terminal for Truss.
If it’s the first explanation, she may well be value to lay a 2022 departure, as bond yields should stabilise/fall.
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
The King would ask Ms Truss:
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
Obviously a lot of focus on Tory MPs, and whether they will put the interests of the nation first. But that now applies even more to Liz Truss. Is she really going to sit in the Commons at 3.00 pm and pretend she retains the confidence of her party, the markets and the country.
Says a lot about the state of things that the government felt it had to announce that more mini Budget measures are being abandoned before the markets had even opened
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
The King would ask Ms Truss:
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
99% you're correct.
In my naivety I'd like to think Charles would in fact say to her,
'Do you think, Ms Truss, that it might be time for a General Election?'
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
The King would ask Ms Truss:
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
And she would reply:
"Your majesty, my priority is making sure we deliver the economic stability that our country needs. That’s why I had to take the difficult decisions I’ve taken today. We need to have a high growth economy but we have to recognise we are facing very difficult issues as a country. And low tax."
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
The King would ask Ms Truss:
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
And she would reply:
"Your majesty, my priority is making sure we deliver the economic stability that our country needs. That’s why I had to take the difficult decisions I’ve taken today. We need to have a high growth economy but we have to recognise we are facing very difficult issues as a country. And low tax."
Although between his question and her reply there would be a 10 second pause.
And after she left the room he'd be muttering something stronger than, 'oh dear, oh dear'
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
Even if she survives today, there are further problems tomorrow and the next day if Hunt starts flexing his muscles in other policy areas.
For example, as a former health secretary is he really going to let Coffey hand out antibiotics like Halloween candy..?
Some of these 'policies' seem to be suicidally idiotic. It suggests that they aren't working with the Civil service or seriously discussing them at Cabinet level.
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
Even if she survives today, there are further problems tomorrow and the next day if Hunt starts flexing his muscles in other policy areas.
For example, as a former health secretary is he really going to let Coffey hand out antibiotics like Halloween candy..?
Some of these 'policies' seem to be suicidally idiotic. It suggests that they aren't working with the Civil service or seriously discussing them at Cabinet level.
I dont think they are. I think they’re making them up on the fly and briefing them to the press. The Tory Party and government’s discipline is simply falling apart.
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
Even if she survives today, there are further problems tomorrow and the next day if Hunt starts flexing his muscles in other policy areas.
For example, as a former health secretary is he really going to let Coffey hand out antibiotics like Halloween candy..?
Some of these 'policies' seem to be suicidally idiotic. It suggests that they aren't working with the Civil service or seriously discussing them at Cabinet level.
Suella Braverman has also gone all Colonel Kurtz.
I thought the Remainer Parliament was the most unreal political time of my life but this might well now be eclipsing it.
The funny thing is that if Truss and Kwarteng had done and said almost nothing over the last 6 weeks they probably wouldn't have faced any problems, above and beyond what the Johnson administration had already caused/experienced.
I'm surprised some Conservative MPs have not crossed the floor. Or perhaps they have tried, and been rebuffed...
Why would they with what it means to be Conservative so in flux? The Conservative Party next month could be a very different thing, with different policies, under Sunak or Hunt or Mordaunt. With Truss on the way out, there’s no need for MPs to leave.
Jeremy Hunt decides that "salami slicing" the mini-Budget is disastrously failing to calm the markets: big new tax rise and spending cut package now being brought forward to *this morning*. Statement expected at 11am, Commons statement 3.30pm
The funny thing is that if Truss and Kwarteng had done and said almost nothing over the last 6 weeks they probably wouldn't have faced any problems, above and beyond what the Johnson administration had already caused/experienced.
Markets now running the country: the peril of losing your credibility. When I saw @KwasiKwarteng on the day of his mini-Budget, making the sums add up almost an afterthought. Said he would bring forward the debt-cutting plan "in the new year". Then Nov 23, then Oct 31, then now
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
The King would ask Ms Truss:
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
And she would reply:
"Your majesty, my priority is making sure we deliver the economic stability that our country needs. That’s why I had to take the difficult decisions I’ve taken today. We need to have a high growth economy but we have to recognise we are facing very difficult issues as a country. And low tax."
No, surely she’d tell him all about the energy price guarantee?
So announcement won’t be in Commons - cue telling off from Mr Speaker on Chancellor’s first day in House.
Not so sure about that. He needs to stabilise the markets pronto. On rare occasions that takes precedence.
If the cause of the turmoil was outwith the governments control then I’d have some sympathy for that argument. As it’s entirely self inflicted I don’t. If Hunt has any sense he’ll start with an apology to the House.
I guess they want to get it out before the US opens.
They're not. They're reacting to an eye-watering level of Government borrowing being used to fund tax cuts on the basis of wished-for growth further down the line. All concealed from the OBR and at a time of an already parlous economy.
They were kissing the ball and praying for good luck before spinning it onto the roulette wheel. Gambling with the nation's finances. These are our mortgages, pensions, prices, savings, being gambled with by a Government with little or no fiscal experience.
I can’t think of a single instance in history when changes to taxes or duties have been “announced” outside Parliament. In one instance when it was leaked, it led to the Chancellor’s immediate resignation. This is a sign of further panic, not greater stability.
I wonder if Hunt has told her over the weekend that we cannot afford her blank cheque for fuel subsidies and that is what has spooked the market so he needs to announce that the package will be much more limited, costed and focused like, err, the one that Rishi was proposing. That would surely be the ultimate humiliation since that is the only thing that poor Truss has been hanging on to.
I really do not see how you produce a credible MTFS with a great big £200bn hole in the middle of it. If he doesn't do this the risk is that we have far sharper cuts in services and a much bigger increase in taxes to pay for it than might ultimately be necessary, depending on the future price of gas.
Ir35 is for the chop according to the infoadmercial of one of those umbrella company selling websites.
There’s a lot of disinformation about that been going round to that effect since the mini-budget. As I’m sure you’re aware, it’s the 2017/2021 changes that are being scrapped, not IR35 itself. But that hasn’t stopped a lot of these companies pumping these out. F***ing LinkedIn is full of them.
I can’t see Hunt abolishing it either and, if he was, there won’t have been time to pump out an infomercial, let alone based on a leak.
Truss won’t go today because the statement will absorb all government time/energy.
Later this week feels like a possibility though.
PMQs will be a complete farce
I wouldn’t be surprised if she is going to try and cling on with this desperate “look I stabilised the market” crap. If she went to the Johnson school of outstaying her welcome it could get messy.
Earliest of early signs of a small movement down in bond yields.
The thing is that bond markets, and indeed equity markets, are influenced by a whole series of international factors that really have very little to do with our local difficulties. The media have to be careful about reading across any immediate reactions in the concept of pass or fail but they are almost always incredibly parochial about it. The increase in interest rates/bond rates and the consequential weakness in Sterling being driven by the Fed rather than anything that the BoE can do being a recent example.
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
Even if she survives today, there are further problems tomorrow and the next day if Hunt starts flexing his muscles in other policy areas.
For example, as a former health secretary is he really going to let Coffey hand out antibiotics like Halloween candy..?
Some of these 'policies' seem to be suicidally idiotic. It suggests that they aren't working with the Civil service or seriously discussing them at Cabinet level.
I dont think they are. I think they’re making them up on the fly and briefing them to the press. The Tory Party and government’s discipline is simply falling apart.
Yes, it suggests that no one has any authority. It won't change until Truss goes. She is ultimately responsible for the situation. Hunt can only do so much in the position he is in.
I'm not sure IR35 changes were what spooked the markets.
True - but the last thing we need with a huge deficit is to open the door to lots of people avoiding tax.
So Hunt is absolutely right not to proceed with Truss's proposed changes.
How is it I know several people who work for single employers but still get paid through a self owned company rather than PAYE? All are varying distances through their plan of moving to a zero capital gains tax country for 5 years to crystallise the gains.
The chancellor should announce that with immediate effect, you must be a foreign tax resident for 25 years rather than only 5 to avoid uk capital gains tax.
Truss should resign as soon as possible and we should probably have an early election.
Even if the Tories were to decide to lose power a year or two earlier than necessary, and hold a general election, they would surely wait until they had a different leader to Truss to campaign for them in that election.
This makes me suspect that the appointment of Hunt has bought Truss some time. Tories now have the luxury of taking some time to have a really good internal struggle over who should come next, because Hunt should prevent imminent total economic collapse. The pressure to agree a unity candidate to replace Truss is much reduced.
I don't think Hunt will change the fuel subsidy because it's a one-off - ie doesn't last indefinitely into the future.
One-off costs don't really matter in the long run - if something only lasts one or two years then it has no impact at all on whether debt falls as a % of GDP in year 3.
The point about IT, CT, NIC changes is they are assumed to be indefinite.
Ir35 is for the chop according to the infoadmercial of one of those umbrella company selling websites.
Firm that only exists because of the way ir35 currently works says ir35 won’t change after all.
With the 25% level of corporation tax - I think the calculations would make returning ir35 to the old approach won’t cost anything like even the September estimates.
Is there any chance that Truss, knowing she's to be ousted, would go to T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶a̶l̶a̶c̶e̶ Clarence House?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
No it didn't, the polls were just as bad for the Major Tories in 1994 as 1997 if not worse. They just ensured 3 extra years in government
Jeremy Hunt decides that "salami slicing" the mini-Budget is disastrously failing to calm the markets: big new tax rise and spending cut package now being brought forward to *this morning*. Statement expected at 11am, Commons statement 3.30pm
Truss is going nowhere unless she resigns. The current Conservative Party uniting round a single candidate? Or alternatively putting it back to the members? Do me a favour.
Ir35 is for the chop according to the infoadmercial of one of those umbrella company selling websites.
There’s a lot of disinformation about that been going round to that effect since the mini-budget. As I’m sure you’re aware, it’s the 2017/2021 changes that are being scrapped, not IR35 itself. But that hasn’t stopped a lot of these companies pumping these out. F***ing LinkedIn is full of them.
I can’t see Hunt abolishing it either and, if he was, there won’t have been time to pump out an infomercial, let alone based on a leak.
I presume the thing that is for the chop is the idea that contractors themselves can declare whether they are working inside or outside IR35, rather than the employer having to make a declaration and being liable for it. I've discussed this with some tax lawyers and the conclusion was that the changes would just lead to more people declaring themselves outside of IR35, thus reducing tax generated, and then leading to more disputes and investigations which are obviously time and resource draining for HMRC.
Thank you Mike. These are extraordinary times. Until the weekend I wasn't entirely convinced that Truss would go.
I think the tory brand is trashed. I guess the hope is that they replace her with some stabilising and sensible person to limit their now inevitable losses at the election. If they can survive with say 100-150 MPs intact from here they will have done well. 200 would be dreamland. As things currently stand they face a Canada-style wipeout. And be in doubt, there's enough anger out there to deliver just that.
There's talk today of heading for an election. Although it is what the country needs to clear the air with a fresh start, I can't see how that can come about. Or are there enough tory MPs prepared to do the decent thing and effectively sign their own death warrants? Might one faction or another throw their toys out the pram and vote down the Government?
No, a Canada style wipeout would be the Tories not only losing by a landslide but even falling behind a populist Farage led party as the main party of the right on seats as well as votes. That is what happened to their Canadian cousins in 1993 when the Canadian Tories got just 2 seats on 16% of the vote compared to 52 seats for the populist right Reform party with the Liberals winning by a landslide with 41% and 177 seats
Truss cannot go until Tory MPs can agree a unity candidate to be crowned the new Tory leader and PM
Does Wallace actually want the job?
He has not ruled it out now and is the only viable unity candidate who could unite the Truss backers and the Tory moderates with a broad based Cabinet while still being acceptable to the membership
As for next leader market (might be next LotO market!), it was put to me that the only person with the moral authority to be PM now is Rishi. His view has been consistent in terms of a fiscal plan and he didn't suddenly switch to the Truss view of the world like so many others.
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Quite where that leaves the Party or the country goodness only knows.
Truss cannot go until Tory MPs can agree a unity candidate to be crowned the new Tory leader and PM
Does Wallace actually want the job?
He has not ruled it out now and is the only viable unity candidate who could unite the Truss backers and the Tory moderates with a broad based Cabinet while still being acceptable to the membership
He's completely untested at the very top of government i.e. not one big offices of state and without a leadership campaign we can't see how he will perform in the spotlight.
Looks like strong potential for another mistake to me.
Truss cannot go until Tory MPs can agree a unity candidate to be crowned the new Tory leader and PM
Does Wallace actually want the job?
He has not ruled it out now and is the only viable unity candidate who could unite the Truss backers and the Tory moderates with a broad based Cabinet while still being acceptable to the membership
He would be another IDS; just not bright enough. Entirely coincidental that he too was a Jock Guard.
Truss cannot go until Tory MPs can agree a unity candidate to be crowned the new Tory leader and PM
Does Wallace actually want the job?
He has not ruled it out now and is the only viable unity candidate who could unite the Truss backers and the Tory moderates with a broad based Cabinet while still being acceptable to the membership
You assume the Truss backers do not have buyer's remorse. If Truss goes now, party and country need an experienced replacement which means Rishi, Theresa May or even Boris. If Truss hangs on for another six months, you could add Jeremy Hunt to the list but if Truss can hang on till summer, why would she need to resign then?
Ben Wallace has now said he is willing to be considered. Ironically, if he still hankers after the Nato job, then Theresa May returning to Downing Street would remove his main domestic rival.
Truss is going nowhere unless she resigns. The current Conservative Party uniting round a single candidate? Or alternatively putting it back to the members? Do me a favour.
Here's the thing: everyone faces extinction if she stays.
So, she won't be allowed to fight a GE and, therefore, Keir Starmer won't be the *next* Prime Minister.
As for next leader market (might be next LotO market!), it was put to me that the only person with the moral authority to be PM now is Rishi. His view has been consistent in terms of a fiscal plan and he didn't suddenly switch to the Truss view of the world like so many others.
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Quite where that leaves the Party or the country goodness only knows.
The membership can go hang.
They've brought this economic mess on the country and should be allowed nowhere the next leadership decision.
Early morning in Ukraine there have been very large number of kamikaze Iranian-made drones attacking cities including Kyiv. A large number have been shot down. There were a few cruise missiles but it was primarily a drone attack. If Russia had lots of spare missiles they would surely be sending them in. It looks like the only munitions they have supplies of currently are the drones.
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Fuck 'em
They got us into this mess.
Imagine waking up this morning worried about your mortgage or your pension. And then you see Sir Roger Gale saying “we’ll, yeah, we’d like to do something to help. But you know, the rules of the 1922 committee do have to be obeyed…”. What gets into the heads of these people. https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1581900069418127360
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Fuck 'em
They got us into this mess.
Imagine waking up this morning worried about your mortgage or your pension. And then you see Sir Roger Gale saying “we’ll, yeah, we’d like to do something to help. But you know, the rules of the 1922 committee do have to be obeyed…”. What gets into the heads of these people. https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1581900069418127360
I did actually close out my Truss out in 2022 position. Things drag on for longer than we would wish, no PM ever has voluntarily left because they believed themselves not up to the job, and the 22 as it stands needs to wait a year and even if the letters go in them what next?
As Portillo said it would have to be an acclamation but who? The only person with the credibility and moral authority to lead is loathed by the membership.
As for next leader market (might be next LotO market!), it was put to me that the only person with the moral authority to be PM now is Rishi. His view has been consistent in terms of a fiscal plan and he didn't suddenly switch to the Truss view of the world like so many others.
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Quite where that leaves the Party or the country goodness only knows.
You assume the Truss-voting membership have not read the papers and realised they've been sold a pup.
Comments
I think the tory brand is trashed. I guess the hope is that they replace her with some stabilising and sensible person to limit their now inevitable losses at the election. If they can survive with say 100-150 MPs intact from here they will have done well. 200 would be dreamland. As things currently stand they face a Canada-style wipeout. And be in doubt, there's enough anger out there to deliver just that.
There's talk today of heading for an election. Although it is what the country needs to clear the air with a fresh start, I can't see how that can come about. Or are there enough tory MPs prepared to do the decent thing and effectively sign their own death warrants? Might one faction or another throw their toys out the pram and vote down the Government?
But she should not.
Neither should this government. The country needs a GE.
(Though I would be open to a GE being delayed slightly, if the prospect of a GE would further spook the markets.)
https://www.ft.com/content/38b30b44-94c2-4775-8efb-2c95b3e8c447 https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1581758810536169473/photo/1
"The chancellor Jeremy Hunt will make a statement later today where he is expected to set out how the government will pay for the plans set out in the mini-budget.
He will bring forward "measures from the Medium-Term Fiscal Plan", in a statement in the House of Commons.
The chancellor and Prime Minister Liz Truss have been speaking over the weekend following her announcement of a U-turn on corporation tax on Friday. It also follows the sacking of Hunt's predecessor Kwasi Kwarteng on the same day.
The full details of the Medium-Term Fiscal Plan are due to be released on 31 October."
If this stabilises the markets, as I expect it will, then I am not convinced that Truss is going to be ousted at the moment.
It may look as if Hunt is in charge, and he is certainly going to come over as incredibly powerful, Liz Truss is well used to U-turns so from her point of view this is just another flip-flop day.
The key question is - is that because traders like what Hunt is saying? Because they’re pricing in an imminent Truss departure, or because they anticipate higher interest rates after Baileys comments?
If the latter, bond yields may well rise further, which is probably terminal for Truss.
If it’s the first explanation, she may well be value to lay a 2022 departure, as bond yields should stabilise/fall.
I think.
For example, as a former health secretary is he really going to let Coffey hand out antibiotics like Halloween candy..?
I'm scratching my head to find any possible ways in which the country can get what it now clearly needs: a General Election to clear the air.
One thing the tories need to be very careful about is that when John Major dragged it out to the last possible moment in 1997 and with a ridiculously long GE campaign, that perception of clinging to the last vestiges of power against the people's will undoubtedly compounded their losses.
https://twitter.com/NovelSci/status/1555028758494576640
What time is the Prime Chancellor giving his statement?
It's great, isn't it? A chain-smoking Health Secretary who passes around prescription drugs.
The telegraph is reporting 11.00am
"Do you think, Ms Truss, that there might be someone else who could command the confidence of the House of Commons?"
https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1581888199311626241
https://twitter.com/JGForsyth/status/1581889180913000448
In my naivety I'd like to think Charles would in fact say to her,
'Do you think, Ms Truss, that it might be time for a General Election?'
I love the idea, obvs, but how?
"Your majesty, my priority is making sure we deliver the economic stability that our country needs. That’s why I had to take the difficult decisions I’ve taken today. We need to have a high growth economy but we have to recognise we are facing very difficult issues as a country. And low tax."
Rumours of announcement at 11.00
So announcement won’t be in Commons - cue telling off from Mr Speaker on Chancellor’s first day in House.
Although between his question and her reply there would be a 10 second pause.
And after she left the room he'd be muttering something stronger than, 'oh dear, oh dear'
Later this week feels like a possibility though.
Read my analysis at @jrmaidment’s @Telegraph live blog on another turbulent day in Westminster.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/10/17/politics-latest-news-jeremy-hunt-budget-liz-truss/ https://twitter.com/christopherhope/status/1581892258101460993/photo/1
I thought the Remainer Parliament was the most unreal political time of my life but this might well now be eclipsing it.
It is absolutely stark raving bonkers.
https://twitter.com/GeorgeWParker/status/1581883782436569089
Grievously self inflicted wounds.
https://twitter.com/GeorgeWParker/status/1581884793645453312
1. To try and stabilise the markets by showing how the books will balanced
2. To try and stabilise the situation in Parliament and talk down mutinous Conservative MPs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-63278993 https://twitter.com/nickeardleybbc/status/1581877124243558400
I guess they want to get it out before the US opens.
Crispin Blunt becomes the first Tory MP to call for Iain Duncan Smith to resign as leader in 2003.
At 5 mins 40 secs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNf-_i8jWMU
They were kissing the ball and praying for good luck before spinning it onto the roulette wheel. Gambling with the nation's finances. These are our mortgages, pensions, prices, savings, being gambled with by a Government with little or no fiscal experience.
Earliest of early signs of a small movement down in bond yields.
I can’t think of a single instance in history when changes to taxes or duties have been “announced” outside Parliament. In one instance when it was leaked, it led to the Chancellor’s immediate resignation. This is a sign of further panic, not greater stability.
https://twitter.com/RhonddaBryant/status/1581893260452450305
I really do not see how you produce a credible MTFS with a great big £200bn hole in the middle of it. If he doesn't do this the risk is that we have far sharper cuts in services and a much bigger increase in taxes to pay for it than might ultimately be necessary, depending on the future price of gas.
Just two of them have been Secretaries of State before
More than 20, including Starmer, have only served in the Commons during Labour’s opposition years
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ebe8ee1a-4d77-11ed-af60-3f894fe60060?shareToken=9aebd62674e1a69fd4adae2fa3c42722
Maybe team Truss should have done this...
So Hunt is absolutely right not to proceed with Truss's proposed changes.
I can’t see Hunt abolishing it either and, if he was, there won’t have been time to pump out an infomercial, let alone based on a leak.
The mess and the damage to our international reputation is completely self inflicted. What a joke.
The chancellor should announce that with immediate effect, you must be a foreign tax resident for 25 years rather than only 5 to avoid uk capital gains tax.
This makes me suspect that the appointment of Hunt has bought Truss some time. Tories now have the luxury of taking some time to have a really good internal struggle over who should come next, because Hunt should prevent imminent total economic collapse. The pressure to agree a unity candidate to replace Truss is much reduced.
One-off costs don't really matter in the long run - if something only lasts one or two years then it has no impact at all on whether debt falls as a % of GDP in year 3.
The point about IT, CT, NIC changes is they are assumed to be indefinite.
With the 25% level of corporation tax - I think the calculations would make returning ir35 to the old approach won’t cost anything like even the September estimates.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63280519
That will give the Home and Foreign Secretaries a headache this morning. Suella Braverman & James Cleverly, at time of writing.
So market more confident Truss will go pre GE but just maybe not quite as soon as expected.
Rishi as PM however would leave the membership apoplectic.
Quite where that leaves the Party or the country goodness only knows.
Looks like strong potential for another mistake to me.
If there is such a candidate it could be someone no-one has thought of yet.
A u-turn a day keeps the IMF away.
Ben Wallace has now said he is willing to be considered. Ironically, if he still hankers after the Nato job, then Theresa May returning to Downing Street would remove his main domestic rival.
So, she won't be allowed to fight a GE and, therefore, Keir Starmer won't be the *next* Prime Minister.
They've brought this economic mess on the country and should be allowed nowhere the next leadership decision.
He got 43% last time and would almost certainly poll more in any new vote given what's happened in the last few weeks.
And the key point is that most Conservative members see it as a social organisation and are not very ideological.
Of course there are plenty of hardcore nutters but they are in the minority.
Some tweets on this today:
AFP photographer @YasuyoshiChiba captured the moment a kamikaze drone dived on its target this morning in Kyiv.
https://twitter.com/COUPSURE/status/1581898167129296896
Remains of an Iranian kamikaze drone that was shot down in #Kyiv
https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1581899069630205954
They got us into this mess.
Imagine waking up this morning worried about your mortgage or your pension. And then you see Sir Roger Gale saying “we’ll, yeah, we’d like to do something to help. But you know, the rules of the 1922 committee do have to be obeyed…”. What gets into the heads of these people.
https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1581900069418127360
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/ukraine-conflict-updates
https://twitter.com/NatashaC/status/1581901772544581633
As Portillo said it would have to be an acclamation but who? The only person with the credibility and moral authority to lead is loathed by the membership.