Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

A LAB majority now a 32% betting chance – politicalbetting.com

245678

Comments

  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    MISTY said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Former minister: “The problem is that even if she sacks Kwasi, there is no solution. I can’t think of what anyone could possibly do to calm things down. Her only option is a total overhaul of team and direction but she has alienated so many because of the reshuffle.”
    https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/1575103357814861824

    Perhaps Jake Rees will step into the fray as Chancellor?
    Look at the wording of that comment. Do you seriously believe a senior tory MP would speak in those terms, or any terms, to some left wing muppet journalist at the Guardian?

    I can think of things, widely believed, that stretch credulity more. And I think it is more likely that it was said than that a decent journalist (which she is) made it up.

    I am not aware of any level of disloyalty or betrayal that is beyond a politician speaking off the record or anonymously.

  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,486
    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Maybe to prepare for the Queen’s funeral she watched Helen Mirren in “the Queen” and so thinks that hiding away from the people and then after a few days of rancour she can do a walk-about and enjoy 25 years of success is the way forward.

  • Leon said:



    I feel like A Conspiratorial Loon

    No worries. We all have our peccadilloes on PB :lol:
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,662
    Bullshit from the Good Lord

    Lord Ashcroft
    @LordAshcroft
    ·
    4h
    A currency trader has just told me that a driver to sell sterling was not just the mini-budget but a concern that Labour could form the next Government…
  • Anybody on here know Kwasi Kwarteng when he was younger? I’ve heard some very odd things about him, which I struggle to believe.

    Son of the PB manse did I believe?
    I believe Smithson Junior was at University with him, but is keeping quiet about it.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,990
    Side note: Operation Rolling Thunder was also the name used by Truss camp for string of high-profile endorsements (Zahawi, Lewis, Javid, Mordaunt) during the Tory leadership race- referenced in this piece https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/09/03/how-liz-truss-won-battle-no-10/ https://twitter.com/benrileysmith/status/1575108612321468417
  • I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,370

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    Its a dungeon, not a bunker. Apparently.
    She's a bit tied up at the moment so is unable to come to the phone...
  • eek said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    Its a dungeon, not a bunker. Apparently.
    She's a bit tied up at the moment so is unable to come to the phone...
    A bit of lubrication might help.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Like i said last night we are at March in the movie threads...provocations continue and there are no adults in the romm
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    I'm going to assume that sabotaging Nord Stream 2 has plausible deniability - Russia can always be like "why would we wreck our own infrastructure / money making pipeline when we could always just turn it off it we want to"

    Actually attacking someone else's pipeline to Europe would be an open act of war.
  • darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
  • Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "GERMAN SECURITY AGENCIES FEAR BOTH STRANDS OF NORD STREAM 1 PIPELINE WILL BE UNUSABLE FOREVER - TAGESSPIEGEL CITING GOVT SOURCES"


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575085436862664704?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng



    Who benefits from this? Is it really Russia? Quite the puzzle

    VDL and Borrell making a statement at 4 on this apparaently
    I feel like A Conspiratorial Loon but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the Yanks did this, not Jonny Moscow

    The pipeline is a crucial choke-point for Putin, he can apply pressure, or allow gas deliveries, as he desires. If the pipeline is destroyed he loses all leverage - after the initial shock. How does he gain from that?

    The destruction of the pipeline means that continental Europe, especially Germany, is more likely to stay loyal to NATO and the western/Ukrainian cause, because there is no longer any choice in the matter

    Cui bono? The USA
    It also looks like it is reinforcing what is being said in back channel discussions:

    "Threatening to use nukes has lost you Nordstream 1 and 2. Use nukes - and every bit of your hydrocarbons kit will get the same treatment. Now, fuck off out of every bit of Ukraine, before we get really pissed off at you and some more of your playthings accidentally break....."
    Seems sensible to me as it prevents Germany getting gas directly from Russia. This ties Germany closer to the hawks - Poland and the US. It's a win for Ukraine.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302

    HYUFD said:

    On current polls Labour would indeed win a majority. Though they should certainly at least win most seats in a hung parliament.

    The latest Yougov would give an even bigger swing to Labour than 1997 since the last general election

    The world has changed in the last week.

    Up until now the polls have not meant much; it was summer, two years out from a GE, people thinking of other things. Now we are into Party Conference Season and they become a bit more meaningful. A lead in excess of 10% becomes meaningful, and after the Kwasifuckup you guys might soon be looking nostalgically back on the time when the lead was that small.

    You need to start work, now, on the reconstitution and repairing of what was once the natural Party of Government.
    I fear that recent times have caused more damage to the reputation of the Tory Party than was even suffered in the 1990s.

    I think they need to be driven from office now, but I hope they are able to rebuild in opposition because I need a centre-right alternative to the Labour Party (who I am currently lending my vote to).

    My fear is that it will take them a very long time to do so - the current generation will need to exit the scene before they will get a look in, IMHO.

    It’s a shame that the red wall generation who could be the up and coming future Tory leaders will likely now be swept away in the coming cataclysm.
    Think a new party on the right may emerge...more nationalist and anti immigration
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,175
    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    Very possible. I always have a month or so worth of emergency supplies
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,568

    If there were a general election tomorrow, which PBers would vote Tory?

    I would likely still give a personal vote to my MP as he is very good. God alone knows how you campaign for the Conservative Party on the doorsteps though.
    It may surprise you to learn this,MM, but I have promised to give a couple of days canvassing time to Tissue Price (alias Aaron Bell MP) at the next election. Why? He's not on my side of the divide, but he's a good bloke, intelligent, and a man of goodwill. He hasn't a hope in hell of holding on, but it doesn't matter. If voters supported men and women of that ilk our government and politics would be much better.

    I urge you to do liewise with a local MP who is obviously a cut above most.
    Hoping "liewise" is a typo!
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 4,587
    148grss said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    I'm going to assume that sabotaging Nord Stream 2 has plausible deniability - Russia can always be like "why would we wreck our own infrastructure / money making pipeline when we could always just turn it off it we want to"

    Actually attacking someone else's pipeline to Europe would be an open act of war.
    Someone posted a map showing the points of explosion just inside international waters, showing someone was being careful: either Russia about Article 5, or someone else trying to give that implication.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302

    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
    Worst pm ever already...quite an achievement
  • Has anyone with an electron microscope found Liz Truss's honeymoon period?

    Poor OGH. He was banking on a big one.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,662
    148grss said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    I'm going to assume that sabotaging Nord Stream 2 has plausible deniability - Russia can always be like "why would we wreck our own infrastructure / money making pipeline when we could always just turn it off it we want to"

    Actually attacking someone else's pipeline to Europe would be an open act of war.

    Craig Murray -
    @CraigMurrayOrg
    ·
    14h
    The Nordstream 2 pipeline allows Russia to send gas to Western Europe without paying transit fees to Ukraine and Poland.
    Russia just completed it in the teeth of massive opposition from Ukraine, Poland and USA.
    Now they are trying to convince you it was Russia who blew it up
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Considering stocking up on food myself...seems silly but when people panic its too late...we are heading straight into ww3
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,990
    This is increasingly looking politically unsustainable.

    One Tory MP tells me: “It’s extinction level stuff. This is like 2008 but worse. We’re messing with the very fundamental principle of providing a home for your family. That’s why it’s different: it’s real stuff”.

    https://twitter.com/PippaCrerar/status/1575112976272850944
    https://twitter.com/torstenbell/status/1575103012045193216
  • DriverDriver Posts: 4,963
    algarkirk said:

    MISTY said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Former minister: “The problem is that even if she sacks Kwasi, there is no solution. I can’t think of what anyone could possibly do to calm things down. Her only option is a total overhaul of team and direction but she has alienated so many because of the reshuffle.”
    https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/1575103357814861824

    Perhaps Jake Rees will step into the fray as Chancellor?
    Look at the wording of that comment. Do you seriously believe a senior tory MP would speak in those terms, or any terms, to some left wing muppet journalist at the Guardian?

    I can think of things, widely believed, that stretch credulity more. And I think it is more likely that it was said than that a decent journalist (which she is) made it up.

    I am not aware of any level of disloyalty or betrayal that is beyond a politician speaking off the record or anonymously.

    It says "former minister", doesn't actually say it's a Tory...!
  • If there were a general election tomorrow, which PBers would vote Tory?

    I would likely still give a personal vote to my MP as he is very good. God alone knows how you campaign for the Conservative Party on the doorsteps though.
    It may surprise you to learn this,MM, but I have promised to give a couple of days canvassing time to Tissue Price (alias Aaron Bell MP) at the next election. Why? He's not on my side of the divide, but he's a good bloke, intelligent, and a man of goodwill. He hasn't a hope in hell of holding on, but it doesn't matter. If voters supported men and women of that ilk our government and politics would be much better.

    I urge you to do liewise with a local MP who is obviously a cut above most.
    Hoping "liewise" is a typo!
    Yes!! I didn't spot it until the time limit for edit had expired. :(
  • Russian government: Sabotaged their own pipeline

    UK government: Sabotaged their own economy

    Tory members: Sabotaged their own party
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,158
    edited September 2022
    PeterM said:

    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
    Worst pm ever already...quite an achievement
    I honestly could never imagine how Boris Johnson could possibly be worsted, but the modern Tory Party has a golden streak of mad genius. It's creative, inspired, counter-intuitive, even - an imaginative and creative triumph.
  • We will 20 point Labour lead within the next month.

    Keir Starmer now looks like the PM more than Liz Truss does, he's played this very well and looks competent and boring. Get us back to that people will say.

    This is end game for the Tories, let's have an election and they can regroup in opposition.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,568

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "GERMAN SECURITY AGENCIES FEAR BOTH STRANDS OF NORD STREAM 1 PIPELINE WILL BE UNUSABLE FOREVER - TAGESSPIEGEL CITING GOVT SOURCES"


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575085436862664704?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng



    Who benefits from this? Is it really Russia? Quite the puzzle

    VDL and Borrell making a statement at 4 on this apparaently
    I feel like A Conspiratorial Loon but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the Yanks did this, not Jonny Moscow

    The pipeline is a crucial choke-point for Putin, he can apply pressure, or allow gas deliveries, as he desires. If the pipeline is destroyed he loses all leverage - after the initial shock. How does he gain from that?

    The destruction of the pipeline means that continental Europe, especially Germany, is more likely to stay loyal to NATO and the western/Ukrainian cause, because there is no longer any choice in the matter

    Cui bono? The USA
    It also looks like it is reinforcing what is being said in back channel discussions:

    "Threatening to use nukes has lost you Nordstream 1 and 2. Use nukes - and every bit of your hydrocarbons kit will get the same treatment. Now, fuck off out of every bit of Ukraine, before we get really pissed off at you and some more of your playthings accidentally break....."
    Seems sensible to me as it prevents Germany getting gas directly from Russia. This ties Germany closer to the hawks - Poland and the US. It's a win for Ukraine.
    Overnight it dismantles about a decade of German energy policy. Hard to see the Russians doing that.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,829
    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 4,587
    edited September 2022


    Due to long term fixes, existing US mortagees will be ok… but new buyers are a bit screwed.

    From 1% to 7% in less than a year.
  • Anybody on here know Kwasi Kwarteng when he was younger? I’ve heard some very odd things about him, which I struggle to believe.

    Son of the PB manse did I believe?
    I believe Smithson Junior was at University with him, but is keeping quiet about it.
    Must ask him on his night shift.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368

    Bullshit from the Good Lord

    Lord Ashcroft
    @LordAshcroft
    ·
    4h
    A currency trader has just told me that a driver to sell sterling was not just the mini-budget but a concern that Labour could form the next Government…

    Unlikely being as there doesn't need to be another election until January 2025.

    Although the last time I heard this sort of narrative was circa 1996.
  • If there were a general election tomorrow, which PBers would vote Tory?

    I would likely still give a personal vote to my MP as he is very good. God alone knows how you campaign for the Conservative Party on the doorsteps though.
    It may surprise you to learn this,MM, but I have promised to give a couple of days canvassing time to Tissue Price (alias Aaron Bell MP) at the next election. Why? He's not on my side of the divide, but he's a good bloke, intelligent, and a man of goodwill. He hasn't a hope in hell of holding on, but it doesn't matter. If voters supported men and women of that ilk our government and politics would be much better.

    I urge you to do liewise with a local MP who is obviously a cut above most.
    My MP is Rupa Huq. Likely to be voting LD … again.
  • Lol, I bet he fcking will!


    That’s pure gold.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,431

    PeterM said:

    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
    Worst pm ever already...quite an achievement
    I honestly could never imagine how Boris Johnson could be worsted, but the Tories are geniuses. It's creative, inspired, counter-intuitive, even.
    I don't think anyone's ever said that Liz is dishonest!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Considering stocking up on food myself...seems silly but when people panic its too late...we are heading straight into ww3
    It don't look good

    “US statements about the possibility of Kyiv's strikes on the LPR and DPR bring them closer to a dangerous brink and make the United States a party to the conflict” - Russian Ambassador to Washington Antonov"

    https://twitter.com/01_fjodor/status/1575095948467765249?s=20&t=kNQUBWIUWwNY0-KuvgbZ0g
  • paulyork64paulyork64 Posts: 2,507
    Selebian said:

    Moving towards my longstanding 40-40-20 view (Lab/NOM/Con).

    I've got (small, old) bets on Con maj and Con most seats :cry:

    (I even kept them when Truss was announced leader, thinking there might be a bit of a bounce to trade them out. Now pinning hopes on the next Con leader and hoping that's before a GE, but they're looking dead parrot sick as bets)
    I've just backed Labour Minority government at 5/1. SKS has ruled out a coalition (yes I know he has to say that atm and it could turn out to be a lie) but I think he'd at least try to go it alone first and that should land me my bet. Labour would need to be in the 275-325 seat range to win. I think that is better than a 5/1 shot but DYOR.
  • 148grss said:

    I still find the pathway to majority for Labour difficult - the SNP hold onto Scotland so tightly I don't see them making gains there. Wales looks like it will be Con free under current polling, and Labour will gain those over anyone else. And I can imagine some Red Wall seats coming "back" to Labour. I just don't know if there are enough competitive seats in the home counties, south and rurally? Maybe the LDs do well enough to win seats / prevent the Tories winning them? Maybe this economic ruin is so bad Tories just won't vote?

    The latest YouGov had fieldwork from Friday-Sunday and had only 47% of Tories sticking with them. How low would that go in a poll today?

    Some of them will be convinced to vote for their local MP, or to stop Labour, but it's not looking great for the Tories at the moment.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 4,963

    We will 20 point Labour lead within the next month.

    Keir Starmer now looks like the PM more than Liz Truss does, he's played this very well and looks competent and boring. Get us back to that people will say.

    This is end game for the Tories, let's have an election and they can regroup in opposition.

    Two years to go, at least.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,160
    carnforth said:



    Due to long term fixes, existing US mortagees will be ok… but new buyers are a bit screwed.

    From 1% to 7% in less than a year.

    A surprising number of people in the US are just on 2 or 5 year fixed mortgages.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    I have managed to find two PBers who will vote Tory, and Mark only very begrudgingly because he is personal friend of his local MP.

    The other guy is some random genius who is probably a Central Office shill, by the nature of his posts.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    Yes, as I said my money is on the USA

    But the Russians will know this, and they will escalate in return. We are really fucking close to a catastrophe
  • Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Where’s the safest place to be?

    Sweden?
    England?
    Montenegro?
    somewhere else?
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398

    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
    I suspect that she is well out of her depth and in a sea of total panic. She has also declared war on the civil service which won't help. She can only look to a few ideologues who she will find aren't much help in a situation like this.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,270
    Scott_xP said:

    Asking Conservative Party members to choose our Prime Minister was like putting a morris dancer in charge of the Large Hadron Collider.
    https://twitter.com/Aiannucci/status/1575097926975913984

    Garbage

    To start with @Morris_Dancer would have put giant, sentient, mutant Halibut in charge of actually running the economy/LHC.

    Genetically modified monster fish have never caused economic collapse or a Black Hole to form at CERN….
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,431

    If there were a general election tomorrow, which PBers would vote Tory?

    I would likely still give a personal vote to my MP as he is very good. God alone knows how you campaign for the Conservative Party on the doorsteps though.
    It may surprise you to learn this,MM, but I have promised to give a couple of days canvassing time to Tissue Price (alias Aaron Bell MP) at the next election. Why? He's not on my side of the divide, but he's a good bloke, intelligent, and a man of goodwill. He hasn't a hope in hell of holding on, but it doesn't matter. If voters supported men and women of that ilk our government and politics would be much better.

    I urge you to do liewise with a local MP who is obviously a cut above most.
    My MP is Rupa Huq. Likely to be voting LD … again.
    Our local MP is Priti Patel! To be fair she's being very quiet.

    Still not voting for her!
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,160
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    Against that, the rise of LNG has increased the domestic US natural gas price, which is politically unpopular. It used to be the case that US gas was completely untethered from the global price, because the gas couldn't go anywhere. Now, it can be exported, and as more export terminals come on stream, the more the US price will simply become the world price.

    Great for (Republican donating) US energy firms. Bad for US consumers.
  • Anybody on here know Kwasi Kwarteng when he was younger? I’ve heard some very odd things about him, which I struggle to believe.

    Son of the PB manse did I believe?
    I believe Smithson Junior was at University with him, but is keeping quiet about it.
    Must ask him on his night shift.
    On the Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart podcast, Rory said something about knowing Kwasi at Eton.
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    I have managed to find two PBers who will vote Tory, and Mark only very begrudgingly because he is personal friend of his local MP.

    The other guy is some random genius who is probably a Central Office shill, by the nature of his posts.

    Yeah you got me. Definitely a Central Office shill. Dick.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368

    Lol, I bet he fcking will!


    I suspect Rishi's spell checker has autocorrected "rope" to "space".
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,270

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    A couple of jars of lutefisk would mean you have your own WMDs for the post apocalyptic aftermath…
  • I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    Very possible. I always have a month or so worth of emergency supplies
    The key is fresh water. Plenty of fresh water.
    And something substantial to board up all your windows.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 4,587
    rcs1000 said:

    carnforth said:



    Due to long term fixes, existing US mortagees will be ok… but new buyers are a bit screwed.

    From 1% to 7% in less than a year.

    A surprising number of people in the US are just on 2 or 5 year fixed mortgages.


    Not according to this, although no definition of long term and short term is given.
  • Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    If Russia wanted to deter the West from retaliating to the annexations later this week, then demonstrating that they have the capability to destroy European gas pipelines would be one way to do that.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339

    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Where’s the safest place to be?

    Sweden?
    England?
    Montenegro?
    somewhere else?
    None of those

    Chile would be my go-to place. The winelands

    Europe will be destroyed, America will be crippled, Asia will be seriously destabilised (and probably also caught up in the coming world war)

    So it's the southern hemisphere. Africa is already fucked, Oz is in the firing line via China, Polynesia is half French and will get zapped

    Much of Latin America is largely uninhabitable due to poverty and chaos

    Chile it is, because NZ is boring
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,288
    carnforth said:

    Centre-left former PM Renzi says Meloni not a fascist:

    https://twitter.com/joelwgibbonsv/status/1574788485420048386

    Somewhat cheering, assuming he’s right.

    He's not an entirely neutral observer here.

    Third Pole, the fully merged electoral ticket between his Italia Viva and Carlo Calenda's Azione party started sniffing before the election about what they might do if Salvini blew up the centre-right coalition at some stage and Calenda, who seems a massive shopping trolley politician having gone, in pretty rapid order, from the near communistic left of PD to a Macronite giving home to Forza refugees, musing about stepping in (still under offering Draghi II, but I'm sure that will pass in time). This may be no more than an extension of that gambit.

    My hope that Meloni might govern in a fairly normal way has been coloured by my respect for Fini and for the party of stability the old AN became at the end, plus Meloni's background both in that setup and the short lived Forza merger under the PdL banner.

    But there's no doubt that her FdI took a more populist campaigning line since 2012, and that stuff is a big worry, especially the more bat crazy conspiracies and political hobbit stuff as I've read around more.

    The understated line of Dutch PM Mark Rutte that Meloni gives "cause for concern" is about where I'm sitting at the moment.

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,160
    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Putin doesn't have any choice but to escalate.

    But his forces are not in a good way right now, and if NATO comes into the war then they will look even worse.
  • MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    The timing is odd for America, if it was holding this back as a threat against Russia. Otoh, the US Navy was supposed to have anti-submarine helicopters around that might have spotted Russian saboteurs.
  • PeterM said:

    darkage said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The only comment Truss has made in the last 5 days is to congratulate a fascist on their election. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    https://twitter.com/WelshGasDoc/status/1575106207618306049

    Hiding in her bunker after less than a month in office. She must be under tremendous mental strain. I genuinely hope she’s got a very good private support network. This kind of pressure would crack a lot of people.
    More than anything else her complete and total absence should be setting off major alarm bells. It is probably making the situation worse.
    Yes. I’m interested to hear her voice when she next emerges blinking into the daylight. A quiver? A falter? A hestitation? It won’t take much before folk write her political epitaph.
    Worst pm ever already...quite an achievement
    Especially given the very high bar set by her predecessor.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155

    148grss said:

    I still find the pathway to majority for Labour difficult - the SNP hold onto Scotland so tightly I don't see them making gains there. Wales looks like it will be Con free under current polling, and Labour will gain those over anyone else. And I can imagine some Red Wall seats coming "back" to Labour. I just don't know if there are enough competitive seats in the home counties, south and rurally? Maybe the LDs do well enough to win seats / prevent the Tories winning them? Maybe this economic ruin is so bad Tories just won't vote?

    The latest YouGov had fieldwork from Friday-Sunday and had only 47% of Tories sticking with them. How low would that go in a poll today?

    Some of them will be convinced to vote for their local MP, or to stop Labour, but it's not looking great for the Tories at the moment.
    But campaigns always have a squeeze effect, and Tory voters are more likely to abstain than vote switch, from what I understand.

    But, who knows - events, dear boy, events...
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Starmer doesn't need to do anything, just quell the Corbynite loons, and his cunning plan is working well. They'll self-implode of their accord. Gizza job, I could do that.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,497
    148grss said:

    I still find the pathway to majority for Labour difficult - the SNP hold onto Scotland so tightly I don't see them making gains there. Wales looks like it will be Con free under current polling, and Labour will gain those over anyone else. And I can imagine some Red Wall seats coming "back" to Labour. I just don't know if there are enough competitive seats in the home counties, south and rurally? Maybe the LDs do well enough to win seats / prevent the Tories winning them? Maybe this economic ruin is so bad Tories just won't vote?

    I agree. To get a majority (326) they need to win 124 seats + every seat they won last time - 124+202.

    In the top 124 target seats are 17 SNP seats, where they will struggle to impact. Plus there will be some losses to someone though maybe only a few. So for a majority you have to look down to target 145 or thereabouts. But several of those also are SNP so difficult. So look to target 153 and consider how likely it is that Labour will win Rochford and Southend East, which they may need to do to get 326 seats. Swing needed: 13.31%.

    I still don't put that as a 32% chance. Though no-one can accuse the Tories of not trying to give Labour a thumping majority, but the valiant Tory effort may not be enough.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    It's *quite a big news day* when the collapse of the world's 6th largest economy is only a secondary headline
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,405
    eek said:

    Not 100% accurate but ..


    Am I weird in that I find the annoyed girl more attractive than the one in red?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,863

    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Where’s the safest place to be?

    Sweden?
    England?
    Montenegro?
    somewhere else?
    In a couple of weeks I’ll be returning across the Atlantic; if they have to choose a time, I wouldn’t mind it being that week, in preference to any other…
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,270

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "GERMAN SECURITY AGENCIES FEAR BOTH STRANDS OF NORD STREAM 1 PIPELINE WILL BE UNUSABLE FOREVER - TAGESSPIEGEL CITING GOVT SOURCES"


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575085436862664704?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng



    Who benefits from this? Is it really Russia? Quite the puzzle

    VDL and Borrell making a statement at 4 on this apparaently
    I feel like A Conspiratorial Loon but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the Yanks did this, not Jonny Moscow

    The pipeline is a crucial choke-point for Putin, he can apply pressure, or allow gas deliveries, as he desires. If the pipeline is destroyed he loses all leverage - after the initial shock. How does he gain from that?

    The destruction of the pipeline means that continental Europe, especially Germany, is more likely to stay loyal to NATO and the western/Ukrainian cause, because there is no longer any choice in the matter

    Cui bono? The USA
    It also looks like it is reinforcing what is being said in back channel discussions:

    "Threatening to use nukes has lost you Nordstream 1 and 2. Use nukes - and every bit of your hydrocarbons kit will get the same treatment. Now, fuck off out of every bit of Ukraine, before we get really pissed off at you and some more of your playthings accidentally break....."
    Seems sensible to me as it prevents Germany getting gas directly from Russia. This ties Germany closer to the hawks - Poland and the US. It's a win for Ukraine.
    Overnight it dismantles about a decade of German energy policy. Hard to see the Russians doing that.
    A faction of German politics wanting to end the reliance on Russia?

    The mistake in all this is assuming countries , political parties and governments are monoliths.

    Even Putin runs a coalition - hence the last moment recasting of his announcement.
  • Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    Yes, as I said my money is on the USA

    But the Russians will know this, and they will escalate in return. We are really fucking close to a catastrophe
    It was clearly sabotage. Who are the Russians blaming? The only way it benefits them is as a causus belli against Nato countries. Do they really want to go there?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,160
    carnforth said:

    rcs1000 said:

    carnforth said:



    Due to long term fixes, existing US mortagees will be ok… but new buyers are a bit screwed.

    From 1% to 7% in less than a year.

    A surprising number of people in the US are just on 2 or 5 year fixed mortgages.


    Not according to this, although no definition of long term and short term is given.
    I'm guessing five year fixeds are counted as long-term in that.

    FWIW - 10% of new mortgages are adjustable rate.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    Yes, as I said my money is on the USA

    But the Russians will know this, and they will escalate in return. We are really fucking close to a catastrophe
    I take no pleasure in pointing out that I have been warning for weeks of the dangers of 'beating back Putin' in Ukraine.

    This thing, about young men fleeing the country, is not great. Who is going to overthrow and replace the regime and build a better one?
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,990
    Tory MP predicts Liz Truss will be gone by Christmas - and says it would be sooner if they knew who would replace her 😬
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575114500927533061
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,969
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Where’s the safest place to be?

    Sweden?
    England?
    Montenegro?
    somewhere else?
    None of those

    Chile would be my go-to place. The winelands

    Europe will be destroyed, America will be crippled, Asia will be seriously destabilised (and probably also caught up in the coming world war)

    So it's the southern hemisphere. Africa is already fucked, Oz is in the firing line via China, Polynesia is half French and will get zapped

    Much of Latin America is largely uninhabitable due to poverty and chaos

    Chile it is, because NZ is boring
    Even in the event Putin was mad enough to launch a nuclear bomb in Ukraine it wouldn't lead to nuclear war with the West unless he attacked a NATO state, just isolation and even tighter sanctions. Though most likely we just see impasse in the Donbass
  • DynamoDynamo Posts: 651
    A big declaration by Putin is scheduled for Friday 30 September.

    Russia is signalling that all they want is the five territories (by far the largest part of what they still need to take is in the DPR) and nukes kept out of rump Ukraine. Of course if NATO countries supply weapons that are used to attack Russian territory that changes the game.
    carnforth said:

    148grss said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point

    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng

    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    I'm going to assume that sabotaging Nord Stream 2 has plausible deniability - Russia can always be like "why would we wreck our own infrastructure / money making pipeline when we could always just turn it off it we want to"

    Actually attacking someone else's pipeline to Europe would be an open act of war.
    Someone posted a map showing the points of explosion just inside international waters, showing someone was being careful: either Russia about Article 5, or someone else trying to give that implication.
    Those locations say nothing about who did it.

    "always just turn it off it we want to"

    The pipelines were already switched off. Or to be more exact, Nordstream 1 was off and Nordstream 2 hadn't come onstream yet.

    The Portovaya compressor plant near Vyborg was also sabotaged last month.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    Scott_xP said:

    Tory MP predicts Liz Truss will be gone by Christmas - and says it would be sooner if they knew who would replace her 😬
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575114500927533061

    well that inspires confidence...not....surely there has to be a general election now
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    Scott_xP said:

    Tory MP predicts Liz Truss will be gone by Christmas - and says it would be sooner if they knew who would replace her 😬
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575114500927533061

    Surely it's Sunak or Mordaunt?

    My money is on the latter as she looked good doing the Royal Funeral, and she might shore up a bit of support in the Red Wall

    The Tories surely know they are finished; it is damage limitation now

    Of course all this is fairly irrelevant if Eurasia is plunged into a wider war, which now looks horribly plausible
  • MISTYMISTY Posts: 1,594
    Scott_xP said:

    Tory MP predicts Liz Truss will be gone by Christmas - and says it would be sooner if they knew who would replace her 😬
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575114500927533061

    Name?

    Oh no name. What a surprise.

  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    edited September 2022

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    A couple of jars of lutefisk would mean you have your own WMDs for the post apocalyptic aftermath…
    I think you’re confusing the mild (but weirdly slimy) Christmas ’lutfisk’ with the explosive stench of Norrland’s ’surströmming’, traditionally consumed in late August, when more southern Swedes are enjoying langoustines (on west coast) or crayfish (inland).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surströmming
  • eek said:

    Not 100% accurate but ..


    Am I weird in that I find the annoyed girl more attractive than the one in red?
    No, you are right, she looks more OK than the one in red!
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486

    I have managed to find two PBers who will vote Tory, and Mark only very begrudgingly because he is personal friend of his local MP.

    The other guy is some random genius who is probably a Central Office shill, by the nature of his posts.

    Yeah you got me. Definitely a Central Office shill. Dick.
    There is no need to dox yourself. There can't be that many Richards at Central Office.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    darkage said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Because that would have been outright attack on NATO.
    Another theory on Twitter is that it is China wot dunnit. Crippling the west AND Russia

    It's got to be the US. Permanently ends European reliance on Russian gas and makes a market for US LNG exports. If Ukraine win the war within the next 6 months then European LNG terminals won't be ready before sanctions on Russia so we go back to a situation of Germany relying on Russian energy. This is now looking impossible without NS1.
    Yes, as I said my money is on the USA

    But the Russians will know this, and they will escalate in return. We are really fucking close to a catastrophe
    I take no pleasure in pointing out that I have been warning for weeks of the dangers of 'beating back Putin' in Ukraine.

    This thing, about young men fleeing the country, is not great. Who is going to overthrow and replace the regime and build a better one?
    my fathers business supplier in asia has rung him in a panic today saying what is going on is crazy and there has to be negotiations....people in asia he says cant believe what is happening
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,339
    I mean, what does this say, if not: WAR IS COMING

    "Harrowing message from the US Embassy in Moscow:

    “U.S. citizens should not travel to Russia and those residing or travelling in Russia should depart Russia immediately while limited commercial travel options remain.”"


    https://twitter.com/Billbrowder/status/1575035910105743360?s=20&t=kNQUBWIUWwNY0-KuvgbZ0g
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,275
    How do you recovery politically when the mini budget is like the Death Star .

    From now on in opposition parties can blame everything on that , even though it was common knowledge the BOE would be raising rates the public will just see the Death Star .
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited September 2022
    The more I think about the BoE intervention this morning, the more terrified I am for the future of my country.

    We were perilously close to a failed auction.

    At any price.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,270

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    A couple of jars of lutefisk would mean you have your own WMDs for the post apocalyptic aftermath…
    I think you’re confusing the mild (but weirdly slimy) Christmas ’lutfisk’ with the explosive stench of Norrland’s ’surströmming’, traditionally consumed in late August, when more southern Swedes are enjoying langoustines (on west coast) or crayfish (inland).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surströmming
    My apologies. I was distracted by all the ball bearings for my Violet Club recreation falling on the floor.
  • Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "GERMAN SECURITY AGENCIES FEAR BOTH STRANDS OF NORD STREAM 1 PIPELINE WILL BE UNUSABLE FOREVER - TAGESSPIEGEL CITING GOVT SOURCES"


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575085436862664704?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng



    Who benefits from this? Is it really Russia? Quite the puzzle

    VDL and Borrell making a statement at 4 on this apparaently
    I feel like A Conspiratorial Loon but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the Yanks did this, not Jonny Moscow

    The pipeline is a crucial choke-point for Putin, he can apply pressure, or allow gas deliveries, as he desires. If the pipeline is destroyed he loses all leverage - after the initial shock. How does he gain from that?

    The destruction of the pipeline means that continental Europe, especially Germany, is more likely to stay loyal to NATO and the western/Ukrainian cause, because there is no longer any choice in the matter

    Cui bono? The USA
    It also looks like it is reinforcing what is being said in back channel discussions:

    "Threatening to use nukes has lost you Nordstream 1 and 2. Use nukes - and every bit of your hydrocarbons kit will get the same treatment. Now, fuck off out of every bit of Ukraine, before we get really pissed off at you and some more of your playthings accidentally break....."
    Seems sensible to me as it prevents Germany getting gas directly from Russia. This ties Germany closer to the hawks - Poland and the US. It's a win for Ukraine.
    Overnight it dismantles about a decade of German energy policy. Hard to see the Russians doing that.
    A faction of German politics wanting to end the reliance on Russia?

    The mistake in all this is assuming countries , political parties and governments are monoliths.

    Even Putin runs a coalition - hence the last moment recasting of his announcement.
    An act of sabotage on this scale can really only have been done by a Government and the only two realistic candidates would be the USA (probably with NATO knowledge and consent) and Russia (who I doubt Russia would have the expertise.)

    But what's the politics behind it. I just don't understand.
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Labrov said from the start that they were unconerned about what the West thought. Only the domestic market mattered. However, their incompetence is showing without any effective opposition. If we discover who bombed the pipeline, it can only be the Russians. The fingerprints will be all over it, despite them claiming a big boy did it and ran away.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    What's happening is horrendous. People's livelihoods, homes, aspirations are being flushed away by incompetent fools in this new Government.

    We need a General Election.

    How soon before we see a 20% Labour lead in the polls? I don't think we've seen one of those for 21 years.

    Starmer is no Blair but Liz Truss is no John Major. Apart from Black Wednesday, the Conservatives actually bequeathed to Labour an economy in rude health.
  • rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    THIS is another good point


    "All the Norwegian pipelines Russia could have hit but didn't:"

    https://twitter.com/FortyTwice/status/1575110218799009793?s=20&t=bPEnGces3IOaSlIpt5Nsng


    If Moscow was minded to blow up some gas pipelines, why not attack Norwegian pipes to western Europe? Thus increasing European energy hunger but keeping open the tantalising hope of energy from Russia?

    I fear we are close to a terrible, terrible war

    Putin doesn't have any choice but to escalate.

    But his forces are not in a good way right now, and if NATO comes into the war then they will look even worse.
    To win Putin has to force the West to back down and cease providing Ukraine with ammunition. He has to scare us enough that we'd sacrifice Ukraine to save ourselves (in the short term).

    If we call his bluff then a defeat at the hands of NATO is more survivable, as less humiliating, than being defeated by Ukraine alone.

    So I think he has to force the conflict to a point of crisis where the West has to choose between direct conflict with Russia, or sacrificing Ukraine.
  • Leon said:

    Leon said:

    I don’t mean to be alarmist, but I suspect we’re about to see the world’s 3rd nuclear bomb attack.

    I just stocked up on conserved food. Dunno why. Can’t see strawberry jam, corned beef and tinned mackerel being much use in a nuclear winter, but it’s just human nature: you gotta do something.

    "US Embassy warns Americans to leave Russia"

    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/28/politics/us-embassy-russia-warns-americans-leave/index.html
    Where’s the safest place to be?

    Sweden?
    England?
    Montenegro?
    somewhere else?
    None of those

    Chile would be my go-to place. The winelands

    Europe will be destroyed, America will be crippled, Asia will be seriously destabilised (and probably also caught up in the coming world war)

    So it's the southern hemisphere. Africa is already fucked, Oz is in the firing line via China, Polynesia is half French and will get zapped

    Much of Latin America is largely uninhabitable due to poverty and chaos

    Chile it is, because NZ is boring
    Glad I’m studying Spanish then.

    Now, how to relocate the entire family to the tip of South America… in a week… ?!?
  • So, to summarise, we're staring down the barrel of a currency crisis, collapsing pension funds, a house price crash, spiraling inflation and 4+ years of woke Labour government, and it's all because some idiot took a suitcase on a late night booze run. Fantastic.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Leon said:

    I mean, what does this say, if not: WAR IS COMING

    "Harrowing message from the US Embassy in Moscow:

    “U.S. citizens should not travel to Russia and those residing or travelling in Russia should depart Russia immediately while limited commercial travel options remain.”"


    https://twitter.com/Billbrowder/status/1575035910105743360?s=20&t=kNQUBWIUWwNY0-KuvgbZ0g

    War is coming, the world fx and bond markets are in serious strife, the fed is on operation crush everyone then flatten the US. Perfect storm.
    All can be solved by reversing the 45p tax rate removal and a Great British start up green energy company
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,158
    edited September 2022
    Re ping's quote,

    That's why the IMF are likely to be eventually asked, as a result of BoE pressure on the government, and then internationally forced, by other countries to become more involved - for other counties' sake, too.
This discussion has been closed.