This story has a momentum all of its own - the Scots Tories for obvious reasons distancing themselves from BJ, but I wonder how this story sits among older (60plus) English Tory voters (N Farage's so called `decent people') who from what I am hearing are not at all happy how this pans out......
Novak Djokovic is now accused of breaking SPAIN'S Covid rules when visiting Marbella last month - with the Serb already facing questions in Australia and Serbia
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
With every loud smash, there'd be a moan or a shout of "stop" from someone in the gathering crowd below. It felt brutal; an assault on beauty.
At a time when statues across the country are being reassessed, there'll be those who believe that if it's legal to tear down a monument to a prominent slaver, as happened in Bristol, it is also time to do the same to an artwork by a man who committed horrific sexual crimes. If that's the case though, where does it end?
I seemed to remember some people raised this issue when mobs starting attacking statues, but they were shouted down. But because this one is "beautiful" that definitely gets a pass.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
"This is such a weird way for the BBC to frame the, very reasonable, objections to Eric Gill that have been raised in recent years. Also, the idea that Qanon is a ‘group’…"
LOL on noticing the small photo-blurb on bottom left corner of Daily Sun:
"RICKY: POPE IS STUPID"
Since the Prince's infamy is NOT enough to knock party-hearty Boris off the front pages, are Mr Gervais and His Holiness teaming up to divert the public gaze from the PM's less-than-secret shame & garden?
EDIT - and is it possible (or is it probable) this header will replaced in subsequent edition by:
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
What syndromes that then? Bit disappointed in all three of you to be honest. 🤨 none of you have a clue what’s really gone on here. The expensive school says what? Proof she came from stable and loving household? Where’s the proof of family accepting of her sexuality? School is school at the end of the day from perspective of child.
I read it as a sad story. That she’s been victimised, and that’s got to stop! I hope it works out for her.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
Yours truly sat in the public gallery at His Lorship's trial in the Old Bailey for several days, we had a better view of the proceedings AND the defendant in the dock, than the media.
At one point, they reported that Archer was taking copious notes of the proceedings. He was definitely using his pen, alright. But what we in the public gallery could see, but the press could not, was that he was actually going though his diary (day planner to Americans) and crossing out appointments.
My thought at the time was, does he think he's gonna be convicted? Which he was, which was NOT much of a surprise, given the testimony and evidence against him.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
What syndromes that then? Bit disappointed in all three of you to be honest. 🤨 none of you have a clue what’s really gone on here. The expensive school says what? Proof she came from stable and loving household? Where’s the proof of family accepting of her sexuality? School is school at the end of the day from perspective of child.
I read it as a sad story. That she’s been victimised, and that’s got to stop! I hope it works out for her.
Possible you are correct. Hope you are, even though its seriously terrible if so.
However, have my doubts. Too many zigs and zags in her story. So retaining original thesis BUT reserving judgment.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
What syndromes that then? Bit disappointed in all three of you to be honest. 🤨 none of you have a clue what’s really gone on here. The expensive school says what? Proof she came from stable and loving household? Where’s the proof of family accepting of her sexuality? School is school at the end of the day from perspective of child.
I read it as a sad story. That she’s been victimised, and that’s got to stop! I hope it works out for her.
Possible you are correct. Hope you are, even though its seriously terrible if so.
However, have my doubts. Too many zigs and zags in her story. So retaining original thesis BUT reserving judgment.
I actually think MR's wrong on this. It is true that an expensive school does not mean she was not abused by her family. However, it does say that she had more opportunity than many who did not go to such a school. Leaving such information out of an application for the Rhodes Scholarship is a fairly sh*tty thing for her to do. The information may, or may not, have made a difference as to whether she was chosen from all the other applicants.
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
I see where you're coming from, but the issue is that Boris never learns. He's making the same sort of unforced errors he has throughout his life, due to the same character flaws. I see little chance of him learning from his recent mistakes and becoming the colossus he is in his own mind.
He is mortally wounded, and I can't see a way back for him. The Conservative Party would be best to get rid and move on.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
It's errant nonsense. And midwifery should not be complaining in particular, what message does it send to pregnant women, a group with low takeup - ooh a bit dangerous to get the jab...
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
A good stab at summarising his 2 years in power - though a little generous on the NI protocol and also the test & trace debacle (as well as the whole whiff of corruption re tenders and big money....) trouble is I think there's more to be found re his administration's shortcomings and he's hardly got a clean sheet.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
Bunch of idiots, the lot of them.
Send an NHS recruitment team to Manila to pick up a few thousand nurses and midwives, then do what Ronald Reagan did to the air traffic controllers.
Oh, and there’s whole layers of NHS management vested interests, that could probably be removed with no noticable difference other than the cost saving.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
We have 10,000 staff across 5 hospitals at our trust. I would estimate that you are looking at 800-1,000 at our Trust either not vaccinated or partially vaccinated (yes some had their 1st jab only, not their second).
Redeployment or termination will be the options and neither are attractive options to Trusts or the individuals themselves.
I think the mandatory vaccination status coupled with an exodus of staff leaving the NHS because of burnout once things start to settle down and difficulty to recruit new staff means tough times are ahead
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
I see where you're coming from, but the issue is that Boris never learns. He's making the same sort of unforced errors he has throughout his life, due to the same character flaws. I see little chance of him learning from his recent mistakes and becoming the colossus he is in his own mind.
He is mortally wounded, and I can't see a way back for him. The Conservative Party would be best to get rid and move on.
I do think that politically it’s going to be difficult for him in the next few weeks and months, but there are an awful lot of people out to get him - starting with Cummings, who was hired to innovate in government and ended up being unceremoniously dumped in favour of the woke wife. There’s also a lot of the media who hate him with a passion because of the EU stuff, and will have a lot of minor stories that they think they can get to add up to something bigger.
I think the crunch point will be the local elections, where he needs to be close to level with Labour to avoid hundreds of council losses. The crunch point with the Tory MP could well be their own pay rise, which is being talked up by the opposition as being a bad thing, despite the fact that it’s below inflation and the authority on the subject has been removed from the MPs themselves.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
Absolutely disastrous for the opposition parties that BJ has strengthened his position as leader of the Tories, oh yes.
That YouGov poll will focus minds. I think he’s done.
It's a bad poll - although less bad than I expected. What is notable is that Labour only added 1 point. It's clear they have not sealed the deal. My own preference would be for Boris to go sooner rather than later to give the party more time to recover lost ground. Generally mid-term polls are a poor predictor for what may happen 2 years down the road so I would respectfully ask if HYUFD avoids telling me what they currently might say about alternative leaders now, 'red wall, Scottish or Falkland island sub-samples..........and drawing a whole heap of ridiculous conclusions from them!
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
That YouGov poll will focus minds. I think he’s done.
It's a bad poll - although less bad than I expected. What is notable is that Labour only added 1 point. It's clear they have not sealed the deal. My own preference would be for Boris to go sooner rather than later to give the party more time to recover lost ground. Generally mid-term polls are a poor predictor for what may happen 2 years down the road so I would respectfully ask if HYUFD avoids telling me what they currently might say about alternative leaders now, 'red wall, Scottish or Falkland island sub-samples..........and drawing a whole heap of ridiculous conclusions from them!
Lab not increasing their % significantly should concentrate Tory minds.
'If only we can get rid of the stinking piece of deadweight that's dragging our numbers down..'
That YouGov poll will focus minds. I think he’s done.
It's a bad poll - although less bad than I expected. What is notable is that Labour only added 1 point. It's clear they have not sealed the deal. My own preference would be for Boris to go sooner rather than later to give the party more time to recover lost ground. Generally mid-term polls are a poor predictor for what may happen 2 years down the road so I would respectfully ask if HYUFD avoids telling me what they currently might say about alternative leaders now, 'red wall, Scottish or Falkland island sub-samples..........and drawing a whole heap of ridiculous conclusions from them!
Lab not increasing their % significantly should concentrate Tory minds.
'If only we can get rid of the stinking piece of deadweight that's dragging our numbers down..'
Well quite - as a Tory I obviously cannot be quite so florid in my phraseology but yes, he would never have been my choice of leader and he has wasted a massive opportunity by his stupidity. However, there are few democracies which lack a broadly right of centre base of around 35% or so and turning that into working majorities requires a better standard of leadership than he has shown. Equally the years have told me that politics can be a fast moving and changing game. At my age predicting much more than an even chance of reaching that dinner date at the w/e is about as far as I'd go - let alone a GE that remains not imminent.
This story has a momentum all of its own - the Scots Tories for obvious reasons distancing themselves from BJ, but I wonder how this story sits among older (60plus) English Tory voters (N Farage's so called `decent people') who from what I am hearing are not at all happy how this pans out......
The Scottish Tory leader and most of his MSPs have called for Johnson to go. If he rides out the immediate furore (including the Sue Grey report, if a police intervention doesn't thwart her first,) then they're going to have to find some effective means to respond or their demands will look hollow and futile.
I can't think of anything short of a divorce from the party in London that's going to seem adequate under the circumstances, especially since Gove is reported to have dismissed Ross's intervention by belittling him at a gathering of Tory MPs in the Commons last night.
Although, as @Carnyx reminded me when this matter was discussed yesterday, it may also come down to the allocation of resources. If the Holyrood branch office doesn't own its own cash and property then it may be felt that it can't afford to go financially, even if it feels it needs to go politically. So, we shall see.
Mornin' All! I see the usual suspects ..... Mail and Express .... are rallying round the PM. But there are two other stories, and both have potential to knock his squirming off the top. The Royal Family is always box office and either the Duke of York has no idea where he puts his plonker or Ms Guiffre has some very greedy, and optimistic 'supporters' in the grey mist behind her. And I think the 'sports star ignoring the rules' story will run.
And I agree with Mr TUD at 6.17 and Mr F at 6.24; all we've got so far is an opinion poll which says 'I won't vote for that lying slob'. Or words to that effect.
If the Mail has noticed that the BJocracy has shat on the SCons, things are bad. Of course the Westminster SCon contingency, Ross aside, has remained notably silent. Does this count as a civil war?
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
Popular currently, sure, but will it be as popular when people start paying for,it.
It is also reckless given we will need fossil fuels for the foreseeable future,
All it needs to finish Johnson off is one more “word of,the day” tweet from Susie Dent and another pithy column from Marina Hyde, the official opposition along with led by donkeys.
That's interesting. This is M&S changing the name. Crazy decision by M&S imo; it is a northern product originally and the North generally does not like BS. The name is not offensive, any more than having "small" as a shirt size or "mini" as a car. Guilt by association for words only works in a handful of cases.
I thought Midget Gems was a brand from a company called Maynards owned or at least marketed by Cadbury, but perhaps it has become a generic?
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
My take on it is that the achievements were down to Cummings and other advisors. OTOH Boris being led by Carrie is a complete disaster.
There is absolutely no way back for him after this episode. At the time of the pandemic people were losing careers for very minor lockdown transgressions. Even the Cummings / Barnard Castle episode was nothing compared to this. Coupled with lies / Allegra Stratton in tears on the doorstep etc.
Boris's approach to the pandemic and dislike for restrictions is as much due to backbench tory MP's as it is to his own political judgement.
His unashamed populism and adoption of the hang and flog em narrative, along with terrible laws following mad public campaigns (not a feature of the cummings era, despite the rhetoric) shows that he is unfit to govern.
Even accepting all that, he did change a lot for the better. But he's now completely lost it.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Yes, that would absolutely be better. Whilst I respect your "none of this matters much" perspective - because in the grand scheme of things you're right - those of us who actually live here largely want good government. Honest government. Values. Ethics. The Rule of Law. Standards.
The current government has none of those, and brings this country into disrepute on the world stage. I would take *any* of the previous Tory governments over this one because though I disagreed with most of their policies they were honest.
This is about who we are first and foremost. Party politics can take care of itself once we're agreed on the basics.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
If the Mail has noticed that the BJocracy has shat on the SCons, things are bad. Of course the Westminster SCon contingency, Ross aside, has remained notably silent. Does this count as a civil war?
The Moggster still has one fan of BJ's up here - the fawning lickspittle David Duguid. He is so enamoured with being sacked as a minister and having his constituency passed over for major energy schemes that he still sings Peppa's praises.
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
I see where you're coming from, but the issue is that Boris never learns. He's making the same sort of unforced errors he has throughout his life, due to the same character flaws. I see little chance of him learning from his recent mistakes and becoming the colossus he is in his own mind.
He is mortally wounded, and I can't see a way back for him. The Conservative Party would be best to get rid and move on.
Yes, he isn’t going to change.
His charm and bluster have worked for him in the past - remarkably, when you think what he’s got away with - but it’s easier eye to eye with one boss (and even then, he got sacked twice). As PM he doesn’t have a boss to persuade - he has hundreds of them all around him, and by extension all of us. Which is a different proposition altogether, and one he hasn’t risen to or applied any thought to how it requires a different approach.
Read most senior political memoirs and it is notable how much attention they pay to scenario planning, trying to think ahead, predict the moves and lines of their opponents, work through the ‘what ifs’ and have their responses ready.
Johnson does none at all, simply relying on being able to wing everything, as he has got away with ever since the days of missing homework.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
The problem there is that the so-called "green crap" is not crap.
It was interesting yesteday listening to the boss of Centrica on R4 demanding a series of measures that would save lots of money for Centrica, and the talking head not skewering him on it.
Equally this AM we have had a representative of the baking industry demanding that the sky is about to fall in, and the BBC R4 presenter not even putting in context by demanding what the extra cost would be on the finished product, whether a loaf of sliced break or a Vegan Sausage Roll.
Electricity to make a loaf in a bread machine is about 5-7p at todays post-doubling electricity prices.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
They’re going to have to anyway.
Regardless its going to be a lot more expensive in future to fight climate change.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Unfortunately for the government we aren't quite at the point where people can be 'nudged' in to paying the rising energy bills without complaint.
That's interesting. This is M&S changing the name. Crazy decision by M&S imo; it is a northern product originally and the North generally does not like BS. The name is not offensive, any more than having "small" as a shirt size or "mini" as a car. Guilt by association for words only works in a handful of cases.
I thought Midget Gems was a brand from a company called Maynards owned or at least marketed by Cadbury, but perhaps it has become a generic?
I recall a vehicle called the MG Midget, which I rather fancied owning at one stage of my life. However, as a two seater soft-top it wasn't really practical in industrial Lancashire so I bought a Mini instead.
Oh well, looks like I’m still in a very small minority when it comes to the PM.
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
I see where you're coming from, but the issue is that Boris never learns. He's making the same sort of unforced errors he has throughout his life, due to the same character flaws. I see little chance of him learning from his recent mistakes and becoming the colossus he is in his own mind.
He is mortally wounded, and I can't see a way back for him. The Conservative Party would be best to get rid and move on.
Yes, he isn’t going to change.
His charm and bluster have worked for him in the past - remarkably, when you think what he’s got away with - but it’s easier eye to eye with one boss (and even then, he got sacked twice). As PM he doesn’t have a boss to persuade - he has hundreds of them all around him, and by extension all of us. Which is a different proposition altogether, and one he hasn’t risen to or applied any thought to how it requires a different approach.
Read most senior political memoirs and it is notable how much attention they pay to scenario planning, trying to think ahead, predict the moves and lines of their opponents, work through the ‘what ifs’ and have their responses ready.
Johnson does none at all, simply relying on being able to wing everything, as he has got away with ever since the days of missing homework.
The Eton schoolmasters (I assume) who indulged Johnson over his homework did him no favours in the longer term. That he was 'affronted' by 'only' achieving a Second at Oxford should have been a warning ng to all around him.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
We have 10,000 staff across 5 hospitals at our trust. I would estimate that you are looking at 800-1,000 at our Trust either not vaccinated or partially vaccinated (yes some had their 1st jab only, not their second).
Redeployment or termination will be the options and neither are attractive options to Trusts or the individuals themselves.
I think the mandatory vaccination status coupled with an exodus of staff leaving the NHS because of burnout once things start to settle down and difficulty to recruit new staff means tough times are ahead
Yes, it is going to be a problem, particularly in certain sectors where cover is already not possible. Midwifery may well be the worst, and not really able to stop the work from coming in. There is a curious distrust of doctors in some sections of midwifery
Personally, I would exempt those with proven antibodies, as their immunity is not very different to the vaccinated.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
The problem there is that the so-called "green crap" is not crap.
It was interesting yesteday listening to the boss of Centrica on R4 demanding a series of measures that would save lots of money for Centrica, and the talking head not skewering him on it.
Equally this AM we have had a representative of the baking industry demanding that the sky is about to fall in, and the BBC R4 presenter not even putting in context by demanding what the extra cost would be on the finished product, whether a loaf of sliced break or a Vegan Sausage Roll.
Electricity to make a loaf in a bread machine is about 5-7p at todays post-doubling electricity prices.
Useless media.
But it’s all very complicated.
Back on topic, it’s why the party matter has finished the PM.
Everyone can understand it. Everyone can relate to it. Everyone (ex the decapitated, obvs) can watch the PM giving his answers and we all know he is still telling a pack of lies. No intermediary of expertise or explanation or political campaigning is needed for anyone to get the message.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Man who lives in petro-state opposes "Green crap".
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
The problem there is that the so-called "green crap" is not crap.
It was interesting yesteday listening to the boss of Centrica on R4 demanding a series of measures that would save lots of money for Centrica, and the talking head not skewering him on it.
Equally this AM we have had a representative of the baking industry demanding that the sky is about to fall in, and the BBC R4 presenter not even putting in context by demanding what the extra cost would be on the finished product, whether a loaf of sliced break or a Vegan Sausage Roll.
Electricity to make a loaf in a bread machine is about 5-7p at todays post-doubling electricity prices.
Useless media.
Whatever to happened to actual journalism, rather than opinion-based ‘news’ and unchallenged vested interests?
An industry that’s been badly shown up in the past couple of years.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Man who lives in petro-state opposes "Green crap".
Now there's a surprise.
Although to be fair, my particular country is doing more than anywhere else in the region to develop an economy not based around oil, and has invested heavily in solar and nuclear.
We notice prices rising too, it now costs me £40 to fill up the car.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Man who lives in petro-state opposes "Green crap".
Now there's a surprise.
Although to be fair, my particular country is doing more than anywhere else in the region to develop an economy not based around oil, and has invested heavily in solar and nuclear.
We notice prices rising too, it now costs me £40 to fill up the car.
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
They’re going to have to anyway.
Regardless its going to be a lot more expensive in future to fight climate change.
Don't forget that the costs of "green" electricity are now below those of 'fossil' electricity, and that there is a significant amount of extra capacity coming on stream this year *, plus the repair of the interconnector damaged by fire last year. Which will help to puncture this bubble.
Which will make it quite a lot less expensive to deal with the energy market bubble at a relatively low cost, and claiming the political benefit. But Boris is such a short-sighted dilettante that he will miss this one too.
* I make this about 5% extra of UK electricity demand being supplied from renewables in the current year - 1.5GW from a normal demand of approx 30GW.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Man who lives in petro-state opposes "Green crap".
Now there's a surprise.
Although to be fair, my particular country is doing more than anywhere else in the region to develop an economy not based around oil, and has invested heavily in solar and nuclear.
We notice prices rising too, it now costs me £40 to fill up the car.
Where are you going to drive to, from Dubai?
Jebel Hafeet is a great road. I've cycled it. I did 285W all the way up in 39deg and felt distinctly unwell after.
I think the need to replace Boris is rapidly approaching 100%. Yesterday's "I'm sorry ... But I didn't realise it was a party" apology/non-apology was so fake and unheartfelt that it really seems to have cut through and made matters worse.
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
Dr. Foxy, the green levy isn't applying to all nations and peoples of the world.
On-topic: is the PM's wife likely to egg him on to stay or persuade him to leave? That may be the key determining factor in how intransigent the buffoon decides* to be.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
The problem there is that the so-called "green crap" is not crap.
It was interesting yesteday listening to the boss of Centrica on R4 demanding a series of measures that would save lots of money for Centrica, and the talking head not skewering him on it.
Equally this AM we have had a representative of the baking industry demanding that the sky is about to fall in, and the BBC R4 presenter not even putting in context by demanding what the extra cost would be on the finished product, whether a loaf of sliced break or a Vegan Sausage Roll.
Electricity to make a loaf in a bread machine is about 5-7p at todays post-doubling electricity prices.
Useless media.
Whatever to happened to actual journalism, rather than opinion-based ‘news’ and unchallenged vested interests?
An industry that’s been badly shown up in the past couple of years.
In the case of the Beeb, it has been stretched too thin, and the website turned into a collection of fluffy bunny and diversity bingo stories.
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
I am however pessimistic about this. There are too many that won't change, and would rather carry on, even when the consequences are already affecting us.
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
I know you and I have had run-ins in the past, Charles, but please don't go. You add to this site.
But if you feel you need to go, have a good one. I'll try and visit the Place again if there's another exhibition.
Edit: and thanks for the banter over the years, and your insight from a different perspective.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Man who lives in petro-state opposes "Green crap".
Now there's a surprise.
Although to be fair, my particular country is doing more than anywhere else in the region to develop an economy not based around oil, and has invested heavily in solar and nuclear.
We notice prices rising too, it now costs me £40 to fill up the car.
Where are you going to drive to, from Dubai?
It’s actually quite a big place. The city is long and thin, and linked with fast roads. My 20 minute journey to work in the morning is 30km, and local trips can be 50 or 60km. If I’m going to Abu Dhabi, Ras al Khaimah or Fujairah, that’s 150km or so away, and a weekend away in Muscat (before the pandemic) was close to 1000km all in. My wife’s car is seven years old, and has a quarter of a million km on it!
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
Please don't go - why should you have to depart? Make the other person go!
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
Hope you reconsider Charles perhaps after a little break? Don’t let the bastards get you down!
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
It is self-sabotage. And is it needed? With Omicron we could very well get out of this without needing this policy against the unvaccinated anyway. Those opposed to this should argue against it in these practical terms rather than from moral positions.
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
Nursing and midwifery leaders have urged Sajid Javid to delay the introduction of compulsory Covid jabs for NHS staff and said the controversial policy amounted to “self-sabotage”.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
It is self-sabotage. And is it needed? With Omicron we could very well get out of this without needing this policy against the unvaccinated anyway. Those opposed to this should argue against it in these practical terms rather than from moral positions.
I suspect the worry is what comes after omicron - if something does and it results in more serious illnesses than omicron does then we have a problem,
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
"For the human race" - Ah I see.
Meanwhile, China, India and Russia are laughing at the West self-imploding.
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
Cannot remember the man's name right now, but Tony Curtis played him in the movie. Started out wanting to be a Catholic brother, then pretends to be one, then graduates to the priesthood, gets busted, moved on to impersonating doctor in the Canadian navy (becoming a hero in the process), then a reforming prison warden in Texas. And he was good at all of these jobs, until he either lost his cool, or circumstances got the better of him.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
Jeffrey Archer (once a Tory MP) also afflicted with this syndrome
What syndromes that then? Bit disappointed in all three of you to be honest. 🤨 none of you have a clue what’s really gone on here. The expensive school says what? Proof she came from stable and loving household? Where’s the proof of family accepting of her sexuality? School is school at the end of the day from perspective of child.
I read it as a sad story. That she’s been victimised, and that’s got to stop! I hope it works out for her.
How so? I'm skeptical. I read that as being at least an equal probability that the "victim" is actually an abuser or a fantasist, and I perhaps feel nore sympathy for her mother. As soon as anyone, such as the Rhodes Trust, starts asking reasonable questions they get blamed. The next Dolezal?
But if funding schemes set themselves up to be exploited, then they will be exploited.
Fake abuse narratives of various sorts is a growth industry imo.
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
Personally I do not know who you are, and don't care either way. I have always found you courteous, civil and insightful and not at all boastful. This place will be poorer without you, I hope you reconsider.
The person you had a spat with seems to enjoy getting into arguments with people. I generally try to ignore him and never respond to him. Life is too short.
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
Please don't go - why should you have to depart? Make the other person go!
Absolutely, especially when that other person just seems to delight in picking pointless arguments and baiting people.
By the way just catching up on the politics. So much for my theory that Rees Mogg would be the one to hand Johnson the revolver. What a charlatan!
His comments on Newsnight have given the Tories in Scotland a big problem, if the clown doesn't go reasonably soon.
DRoss and most of his colleagues look at the PM, the polls and the forthcoming May local elections and think "uh oh". So set out a principled position before yesterday's sorrynotsorry and followed through with it.
On one hand that should give them an element of protection from the electorate. But BJ continues to suck and now Lord Mogg says that Scotland and Scottish MPs and the leader of the party in Scotland are "lightweight".
In the short term how does DRoss try and form a compact with the electorate to save May's elections? What can he say / do? And what does it mean for the medium and long term - a divorce between the parties either side of the wall?
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
"For the human race" - Ah I see.
Meanwhile, China, India and Russia are laughing at the West self-imploding.
China is doing a lot itself to address climate change. India should be as it faces large parts of its territory becoming uninhabitable in the next century. Russia is a gangster state in terminal decline. The West is doing the right thing on climate change, but not enough.
Dr. Foxy, do you think people will be delighted at green levies (or whatever name they're given) driving up energy costs significantly?
No. It is however essential that climate change is tackled by all nations and peoples of the world. The alternative is not a good outcome for the human race.
"For the human race" - Ah I see.
Meanwhile, China, India and Russia are laughing at the West self-imploding.
China is doing a lot itself to address climate change. India should be as it faces large parts of its territory becoming uninhabitable in the next century. Russia is a gangster state in terminal decline. The West is doing the right thing on climate change, but not enough.
Even if Bozo survives this and leads the Tories into the next GE the stench surrounding him will once again come to the fore when the opposition hammer the point home that you can’t trust a word he says and any election promises are likely to be broken .
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
To be replaced by a ‘proper’ conservative, willing to drop the ‘green crap’ and cut public spending to balance the budget? Be careful what you wish for…
Cutting public spending wont retain the red wall.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
I think it’s starting to dawn on people, that the persuit of a decarbonised economy comes at a high price. Even the wealthy South East isn’t full of people who can easily stump up another £100 a *month* in energy bills.
Exactly. Support for this will soon diminish when people start to pay the bills and it is fine for wealthy middle class posters here to say we have to do it. They can afford to pay it.
Ultimately we have got to keep using fossil fuels until we can fully transition to renewables and they can deliver 100% of our growing energy needs all year round. That will not be for a very long time either. So impoverishing further the poor is not going to help.
By the way just catching up on the politics. So much for my theory that Rees Mogg would be the one to hand Johnson the revolver. What a charlatan!
His comments on Newsnight have given the Tories in Scotland a big problem, if the clown doesn't go reasonably soon.
DRoss and most of his colleagues look at the PM, the polls and the forthcoming May local elections and think "uh oh". So set out a principled position before yesterday's sorrynotsorry and followed through with it.
On one hand that should give them an element of protection from the electorate. But BJ continues to suck and now Lord Mogg says that Scotland and Scottish MPs and the leader of the party in Scotland are "lightweight".
In the short term how does DRoss try and form a compact with the electorate to save May's elections? What can he say / do? And what does it mean for the medium and long term - a divorce between the parties either side of the wall?
And yet if they split - who would take the Scottish Tories seriously? Both HYUFD and Mr R-M are already dissing them; they have given up on them already.
What is Mr Ross going to do without the money and assets? Bearing in mind a lot of members and voters will hop ship to the SLDs and Ms Ballantyne's mob rather than vote for Unionist Party 2.0 - which really, really has an unhappy name/connotations in Scotland.
What is Mr Ross going to tell voters? "That bunch in London are a big golden turd like an Edinburgh hotel and I want Scotland to stick to them and do whatever they say."
As people who were around last night may have seen, I had a small spat with someone.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
I hope you reconsider, you would be much missed.
He probably needs another 3-4 people asking him to stay before the reverse flounce is on.
Comments
Perhaps the Great British Public has room in its collective spleen for two top-tier scandals? And scoundrels?
Novak Djokovic is now accused of breaking SPAIN'S Covid rules when visiting Marbella last month - with the Serb already facing questions in Australia and Serbia
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10396519/Djokovic-trouble-THREE-countries-Concerns-star-broke-Spains-rules-visiting.html
A Rhodes Scholar who won a coveted scholarship at Oxford after claiming she overcame childhood abuse and grew up in foster care has been accused of lying to officials and is in fact the daughter of a radiologist who went to private school.
Mackenzie Fierceton, 24, describes herself as a 'queer, first generation, low income' student at The University of Pennsylvania. In 2020, she was given a scholarship to go to Oxford after dazzling the Rhodes Trust with her story of how she overcame welfare, an abusive mother and the foster care system.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10394333/Rhodes-Scholar-claimed-abused-accused-making-up.html
With every loud smash, there'd be a moan or a shout of "stop" from someone in the gathering crowd below. It felt brutal; an assault on beauty.
At a time when statues across the country are being reassessed, there'll be those who believe that if it's legal to tear down a monument to a prominent slaver, as happened in Bristol, it is also time to do the same to an artwork by a man who committed horrific sexual crimes. If that's the case though, where does it end?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-59972806
I seemed to remember some people raised this issue when mobs starting attacking statues, but they were shouted down. But because this one is "beautiful" that definitely gets a pass.
It was a disease, a mental condition. Sounds like this young woman has something similar. Person of considerable intelligence and talent, who is unable to cope with their reality to some significant degree. And - most unlike most of us - actually does something about it, by creating a better one for themselves. As long as they can keep all the spinning plates in the air, that is.
Sound familiar?
PLUS she and #45 share the same alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.
Ben Franklin must be proud?
https://twitter.com/nickfthilton/status/1481402486523310080?s=20
"RICKY: POPE IS STUPID"
Since the Prince's infamy is NOT enough to knock party-hearty Boris off the front pages, are Mr Gervais and His Holiness teaming up to divert the public gaze from the PM's less-than-secret shame & garden?
EDIT - and is it possible (or is it probable) this header will replaced in subsequent edition by:
"POPE: RICKY IS STUPID"
I read it as a sad story. That she’s been victimised, and that’s got to stop! I hope it works out for her.
At one point, they reported that Archer was taking copious notes of the proceedings. He was definitely using his pen, alright. But what we in the public gallery could see, but the press could not, was that he was actually going though his diary (day planner to Americans) and crossing out appointments.
My thought at the time was, does he think he's gonna be convicted? Which he was, which was NOT much of a surprise, given the testimony and evidence against him.
Significantly, the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts in England, made clear it believed that the policy is being introduced at undue haste
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jan/12/sajid-javid-urged-to-delay-mandatory-jabs-for-nhs-staff-in-england
The thing is just kicking the can down the road won't change anything. Those working for the NHS, who have always been at the front of the queue for jabs, and yet still aren't jabbed over a year after they could, aren't just going to do so in a few weeks time.
NHS workers have had far longer than care home staff to get the bloody jab.
However, have my doubts. Too many zigs and zags in her story. So retaining original thesis BUT reserving judgment.
https://twitter.com/InbetweenerVidz/status/1481210950120321029?s=20
I don’t have any particular like for the guy, have met several sales people with similar personalities over the years and know not to trust them as far as I can throw them. He was in the right place at the right time in 2019 though, and added many Conservative seats in traditionally Labour areas.
He wouldn’t have been many people’s choice to handle a pandemic, but the vaccine rollout was brilliant and in recent times he’s avoided imposing restrictions that were put in place elsewhere.
When the LotO calls directly for the PM to resign, and he doesn’t, that makes Starmer look weak. All the attacks at PMQs will have done is strengthened his position, even if it’s only on a temporary basis.
He is mortally wounded, and I can't see a way back for him. The Conservative Party would be best to get rid and move on.
https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1481398303241740294
Send an NHS recruitment team to Manila to pick up a few thousand nurses and midwives, then do what Ronald Reagan did to the air traffic controllers.
Oh, and there’s whole layers of NHS management vested interests, that could probably be removed with no noticable difference other than the cost saving.
Redeployment or termination will be the options and neither are attractive options to Trusts or the individuals themselves.
I think the mandatory vaccination status coupled with an exodus of staff leaving the NHS because of burnout once things start to settle down and difficulty to recruit new staff means tough times are ahead
I think the crunch point will be the local elections, where he needs to be close to level with Labour to avoid hundreds of council losses. The crunch point with the Tory MP could well be their own pay rise, which is being talked up by the opposition as being a bad thing, despite the fact that it’s below inflation and the authority on the subject has been removed from the MPs themselves.
The best thing for Labour is he limps on to the GE , the best thing for the country however is for Bozo to depart.
And i’m willing to bet the “green crap” is popular in the wealthy lib dem targeted blue wall.
Doesn’t sound like a winning electoral strategy.
'If only we can get rid of the stinking piece of deadweight that's dragging our numbers down..'
I can't think of anything short of a divorce from the party in London that's going to seem adequate under the circumstances, especially since Gove is reported to have dismissed Ross's intervention by belittling him at a gathering of Tory MPs in the Commons last night.
Although, as @Carnyx reminded me when this matter was discussed yesterday, it may also come down to the allocation of resources. If the Holyrood branch office doesn't own its own cash and property then it may be felt that it can't afford to go financially, even if it feels it needs to go politically. So, we shall see.
I see the usual suspects ..... Mail and Express .... are rallying round the PM. But there are two other stories, and both have potential to knock his squirming off the top.
The Royal Family is always box office and either the Duke of York has no idea where he puts his plonker or Ms Guiffre has some very greedy, and optimistic 'supporters' in the grey mist behind her.
And I think the 'sports star ignoring the rules' story will run.
And I agree with Mr TUD at 6.17 and Mr F at 6.24; all we've got so far is an opinion poll which says 'I won't vote for that lying slob'. Or words to that effect.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/12/rory-kinnear-no-10-lockdown-party-buried-sister
An absolutely heartbreaking and powerful read.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/12/midget-gems-renamed-disability-campaigner-claims-word-hate-speech/
It is also reckless given we will need fossil fuels for the foreseeable future,
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-01-10/greenflation-is-a-crucial-step-in-the-energy-transition-central-banks-take-note
I would just reiterate my message of yesterday. Be kind, Conservative MPs. Put the fool out of his misery.
I thought Midget Gems was a brand from a company called Maynards owned or at least marketed by Cadbury, but perhaps it has become a generic?
OTOH Boris being led by Carrie is a complete disaster.
There is absolutely no way back for him after this episode. At the time of the pandemic people were losing careers for very minor lockdown transgressions. Even the Cummings / Barnard Castle episode was nothing compared to this. Coupled with lies / Allegra Stratton in tears on the doorstep etc.
Boris's approach to the pandemic and dislike for restrictions is as much due to backbench tory MP's as it is to his own political judgement.
His unashamed populism and adoption of the hang and flog em narrative, along with terrible laws following mad public campaigns (not a feature of the cummings era, despite the rhetoric) shows that he is unfit to govern.
Even accepting all that, he did change a lot for the better. But he's now completely lost it.
The current government has none of those, and brings this country into disrepute on the world stage. I would take *any* of the previous Tory governments over this one because though I disagreed with most of their policies they were honest.
This is about who we are first and foremost. Party politics can take care of itself once we're agreed on the basics.
His charm and bluster have worked for him in the past - remarkably, when you think what he’s got away with - but it’s easier eye to eye with one boss (and even then, he got sacked twice). As PM he doesn’t have a boss to persuade - he has hundreds of them all around him, and by extension all of us. Which is a different proposition altogether, and one he hasn’t risen to or applied any thought to how it requires a different approach.
Read most senior political memoirs and it is notable how much attention they pay to scenario planning, trying to think ahead, predict the moves and lines of their opponents, work through the ‘what ifs’ and have their responses ready.
Johnson does none at all, simply relying on being able to wing everything, as he has got away with ever since the days of missing homework.
It was interesting yesteday listening to the boss of Centrica on R4 demanding a series of measures that would save lots of money for Centrica, and the talking head not skewering him on it.
Equally this AM we have had a representative of the baking industry demanding that the sky is about to fall in, and the BBC R4 presenter not even putting in context by demanding what the extra cost would be on the finished product, whether a loaf of sliced break or a Vegan Sausage Roll.
Electricity to make a loaf in a bread machine is about 5-7p at todays post-doubling electricity prices.
Useless media.
Regardless its going to be a lot more expensive in future to fight climate change.
Backed Starmer at 7 to be next PM a day or two ago, now he's over 9.
*sighs*
Personally, I would exempt those with proven antibodies, as their immunity is not very different to the vaccinated.
Back on topic, it’s why the party matter has finished the PM.
Everyone can understand it. Everyone can relate to it. Everyone (ex the decapitated, obvs) can watch the PM giving his answers and we all know he is still telling a pack of lies. No intermediary of expertise or explanation or political campaigning is needed for anyone to get the message.
Now there's a surprise.
An industry that’s been badly shown up in the past couple of years.
Although to be fair, my particular country is doing more than anywhere else in the region to develop an economy not based around oil, and has invested heavily in solar and nuclear.
We notice prices rising too, it now costs me £40 to fill up the car.
So very nearly.
£100 a month is about 25% of what it costs to keep one small dog, and most people seem to be able to afford that everywhere.
https://www.pdsa.org.uk/pet-help-and-advice/looking-after-your-pet/puppies-dogs/the-cost-of-owning-a-dog
And the "green taxes" are only £12 a month.
Don't forget that the costs of "green" electricity are now below those of 'fossil' electricity, and that there is a significant amount of extra capacity coming on stream this year *, plus the repair of the interconnector damaged by fire last year. Which will help to puncture this bubble.
Which will make it quite a lot less expensive to deal with the energy market bubble at a relatively low cost, and claiming the political benefit. But Boris is such a short-sighted dilettante that he will miss this one too.
* I make this about 5% extra of UK electricity demand being supplied from renewables in the current year - 1.5GW from a normal demand of approx 30GW.
While I’ve never made a particular secret of my identity this individual chose to highlight the fact that he knew some of my family in the real world.
That really doesn’t sit well with me and, frankly, doesn’t fit with the culture of this place which - to my mind - has always operated on “Chatham house rules”.
So it’s time for me to say goodbye.
Have fun and play nice. I shall miss the wit and insight.
On-topic: is the PM's wife likely to egg him on to stay or persuade him to leave? That may be the key determining factor in how intransigent the buffoon decides* to be.
*Or 'is decided'.
But if you feel you need to go, have a good one. I'll try and visit the Place again if there's another exhibition.
Edit: and thanks for the banter over the years, and your insight from a different perspective.
BF do not say, however, how they define starting the tournament. First match played, first match Djokovic plays, or first round draw??
But if funding schemes set themselves up to be exploited, then they will be exploited.
Fake abuse narratives of various sorts is a growth industry imo.
The person you had a spat with seems to enjoy getting into arguments with people. I generally try to ignore him and never respond to him. Life is too short.
On one hand that should give them an element of protection from the electorate. But BJ continues to suck and now Lord Mogg says that Scotland and Scottish MPs and the leader of the party in Scotland are "lightweight".
In the short term how does DRoss try and form a compact with the electorate to save May's elections? What can he say / do? And what does it mean for the medium and long term - a divorce between the parties either side of the wall?
Ultimately we have got to keep using fossil fuels until we can fully transition to renewables and they can deliver 100% of our growing energy needs all year round. That will not be for a very long time either. So impoverishing further the poor is not going to help.
Driving away healthcare professionals is dumb generally and especially unwise during a pandemic. What's the benefit?
What is Mr Ross going to do without the money and assets? Bearing in mind a lot of members and voters will hop ship to the SLDs and Ms Ballantyne's mob rather than vote for Unionist Party 2.0 - which really, really has an unhappy name/connotations in Scotland.
What is Mr Ross going to tell voters? "That bunch in London are a big golden turd like an Edinburgh hotel and I want Scotland to stick to them and do whatever they say."
Who said that?
Nicola Sturgeon?
Anas Sarwar?
Patrick Harvie?
Michelle Ballantyne?
Nope. It was fellow Conservative, cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg. In a BBC interview no less.
Who needs enemies when you’ve got friends like that?
In a “lightweight” competition, Rees-Mogg wins hands down.