Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

Can anyone explain the mindset of anti-vaxxers like this? – politicalbetting.com

1356711

Comments

  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,505
    edited December 2021

    eek said:

    The judge has just adjourned court for the day. No sentencing date has been set yet.

    NY Times

    Deciding whether her sentence is billions or just millions of years.

    I wonder if her suicide watch will be any better than that for her man?
    40 years for one of the charges.

    She is 60.
    I don’t think it makes any difference she’s been found guilty and will be spending the rest of her life in prison.

    I suspect it will be the sort of consecutive sentence that the US loves to hand out so probably 60 years in jail.
    Good. We should embrace consecutive sentences in this country too.

    Its beyond a joke that a criminal can commit as many crimes as they like and they'll only ever risk sentencing for one of them, if that.
    We already do. The court has discretion within guidelines.

    eg https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/overarching-guides/magistrates-court/item/totality/

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    edited December 2021

    eek said:

    A jury has found Ghislaine Maxwell

    Count 1: Guilty
    Count 2: Not Guilty
    Count 3: Guilty
    Count 4: Guilty
    Count 5: Guilty
    Count 6: Guilty

    Not guilty on what charge?
    Enticing TSE to f**k a stepmom on pornhub.
    Obviously not guilty. Why would he need enticement?

    ;)
  • Options
    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
  • Options
    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344
  • Options

    Foxy said:

    I am currently "isolating". Since I live alone and WFH, there is little difference to my usual life except I now get groceries online.
    I was at my son's over Xmas and he has had a positive PCR. He has not had a booster yet.
    I have a negative LFT, been boosted and I feel fine, but still have to isolate for 10 days.
    I have been requested via the app to take a PCR test, but apparently I should still isolate even if that is negative too, so what's the point in taking one?
    Vaccines work, boosters work. And Johnson, Sturgeon and Drakeford being absolute CU Next Tuesdays with the restrictions doesn't change that.
    I am coming to the conclusion that Track & Trace is simply stopping healthy people from working.

    You are not required to self-isolate if you have been vaccinated.

    "Contacts who are not required to self-isolate
    If you have had contact with someone who has COVID-19 you are at higher risk of becoming infected yourself and are strongly advised to take daily LFDs for 7 days.

    If you have been in contact with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19, you are not legally required to self-isolate if you are fully vaccinated or you are below the age of 18 years 6 months."


    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-for-contacts-of-people-with-possible-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-who-do-not-live-with-the-person/guidance-for-contacts-of-people-with-possible-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-who-do-not-live-with-the-person#exempt
    That's not what the text I got today said.
    This is the text that I got when contacted by T and T:

    "NHS Test and Trace has identified you as a contact of someone who recently tested positive for COVID-19.

    You do not have to self-isolate. However, you should book a PCR test, even if you do not have symptoms.

    If you develop symptoms, you should self-isolate immediately before taking your PCR test.

    Book your test at https://contact-tracing.phe.gov.uk/links/ask-for-a-coronavirus-test.

    To protect yourself and those around you, follow the guidance for staying safe and helping to prevent the spread of the virus. For more information and details about exemption from self-isolation, visit: https://contact-tracing.phe.gov.uk/links/guidance-for-contacts

    To update details on your Test and Trace account, visit: https://contact-tracing.phe.gov.uk/ and sign in with your account ID and password."

    What did yours say?
    "Please isolate for the full 10 day isolation period, even if you are fully vaccinated, have no symptoms and your PCR result is negative."
    When did you get that message?

    When news about Omicron broke the isolation period was introduced for all even the vaccinated, but that was swiftly reversed by the Government who brought back the rule that the vaccinated didn't need to isolate.

    That message seems out of date.
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,898
    edited December 2021

    There’s going to be another gap over NY on data:

    And lastly, there will be another 4-day span over new years with no data being released again (1st/2nd/3rd/4th).

    No Scottish data will be released at all, and I believe there won't be any data for Wales/Northern Ireland on the 1st/2nd/3rd either.


    https://twitter.com/TravellingTabby/status/1476319907344109569?s=20

    So expect a major “surge” (sic) on the 5th..

    That number will be absolutely enormous. I always thought the 27th of Dec or 5th Jan would be the date Sturgeon goes for new restrictions, and the timing works well for the latter.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,957
    Just encountered the portmanteau Twixmas.
    No, no and thrice no thank you.
  • Options
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Scott_xP said:

    GUARDIAN: Hospitals urged to find space for 4000 extra beds as cases surge #TomorrowsPapersToday https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1476316165735657482/photo/1

    Yep, as mentioned by me earlier. Better than the first Nightingales, but staffing is the critical bit...
    Can we have unvaccinated patients treated by unvaccinated staff in the tents please?
    By treated, do you mean occasional cups of broth?
    The broth may go cold and lose its efficacy in a tent in a Leicester January.
    Not at current day time temperatures!!
  • Options
    pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,132
    Foxy said:

    glw said:

    I could be wrong but I think someone from the Scottish Government at some point recently "suggested" everyone should be taking an LFT every day. So some of the demand problem may be self-inflicted in that sense...

    The two tests a week rate was intended to be frequent enough to have a good chance of catching an infection that was substantial enough to likely lead to further infections. It might need to be more frequent with Omicron, but unless there is evidence to back it up I can't see any reason for the public to be doing a daily test unless they work in something like healthcare.
    Daily testing with LFTs is recommended for contacts via T and T instead of isolating.
    So, in summary, between the entreaties to be cautious and do testing before meeting people all over the holiday period, and the latest version of the rules surrounding isolation, the Government has stoked more demand for tests - even in our system, which compared to many other jurisdictions actually contains a lot of capacity - than can possibly be met by the available supply.

    I wonder how many weeks we'll make it into January before the entire testing and isolation system simply collapses? If there are enough workers in vital occupations being forced to isolate at the same time then the requirements will have to be relaxed or scrapped anyway, let alone if tests that permit early release cannot be found for love nor money.
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    Wise words.
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    edited December 2021
    londoneye said:

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    very good point there
    Hi

    Exceptionally crap point, actually, what the Holy fuck is "reclaiming our own health" meant to mean? Please elucidate. Does it work better than the polio vaccine against polio, for instance?
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,505
    edited December 2021
    Charles said:

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

    I think this is just Macron being a twat again, assuming the allegation is true.

    Blocking the UK, when Belgium had had case rates twice as high as our peak at that point for weeks was the action of a kneejerking numpty.
  • Options

    On topic.

    Death penalty for these morons, these fuckers are denying the jab to people who need it, they have blood on their hands.

    Absolute [naughty word that OGH bans people for using.]

    i think you are getting a bit carried away there pal
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549
    Foxy said:

    glw said:

    I could be wrong but I think someone from the Scottish Government at some point recently "suggested" everyone should be taking an LFT every day. So some of the demand problem may be self-inflicted in that sense...

    The two tests a week rate was intended to be frequent enough to have a good chance of catching an infection that was substantial enough to likely lead to further infections. It might need to be more frequent with Omicron, but unless there is evidence to back it up I can't see any reason for the public to be doing a daily test unless they work in something like healthcare.
    Daily testing with LFTs is recommended for contacts via T and T instead of isolating.
    Yes, but that's not "everyone" that's for people who have been instructed to do so by Test and Trace.

    Two tests was thought to be sufficient for general testing by the public. Every day pushes the required tests up by 250%, if politicians are giving out such advice it needs to be backed up by evidence that it is necessary.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660
    edited December 2021

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Foxy said:

    eek said:

    The judge has just adjourned court for the day. No sentencing date has been set yet.

    NY Times

    Deciding whether her sentence is billions or just millions of years.

    I wonder if her suicide watch will be any better than that for her man?
    40 years for one of the charges.

    She is 60.
    I don’t think it makes any difference she’s been found guilty and will be spending the rest of her life in prison.

    I suspect it will be the sort of consecutive sentence that the US loves to hand out so probably 60 years in jail.
    Good. We should embrace consecutive sentences in this country too.

    Its beyond a joke that a criminal can commit as many crimes as they like and they'll only ever risk sentencing for one of them, if that.
    Yes, it works so well in America that they have virtually no crime.
    The problem with American jails is the ludicrous sentencing for minor drug charges.

    For a period, under the Coalition, they changed the rules on bail. If you were out on bail for one offence and committed another offence, then you went on remand. This warehoused a lot of the habituals and the crime rate fell.
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Scott_xP said:

    GUARDIAN: Hospitals urged to find space for 4000 extra beds as cases surge #TomorrowsPapersToday https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1476316165735657482/photo/1

    Yep, as mentioned by me earlier. Better than the first Nightingales, but staffing is the critical bit...
    Can we have unvaccinated patients treated by unvaccinated staff in the tents please?
    By treated, do you mean occasional cups of broth?
    The broth may go cold and lose its efficacy in a tent in a Leicester January.
    You'd want to administer as a suppository, of course
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,112
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Scott_xP said:

    GUARDIAN: Hospitals urged to find space for 4000 extra beds as cases surge #TomorrowsPapersToday https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1476316165735657482/photo/1

    Yep, as mentioned by me earlier. Better than the first Nightingales, but staffing is the critical bit...
    Can we have unvaccinated patients treated by unvaccinated staff in the tents please?
    By treated, do you mean occasional cups of broth?
    The broth may go cold and lose its efficacy in a tent in a Leicester January.
    But do you want your budgets going on heating their broth?
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,898

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
    I was called an anti-vaxxer here for pointing out that constant boosters for younger people isn't necessarily in their personal interest.

    Side effects + travel time/time off work make it borderline at the very least.
  • Options

    eek said:

    The judge has just adjourned court for the day. No sentencing date has been set yet.

    NY Times

    Deciding whether her sentence is billions or just millions of years.

    I wonder if her suicide watch will be any better than that for her man?
    40 years for one of the charges.

    She is 60.
    I don’t think it makes any difference she’s been found guilty and will be spending the rest of her life in prison.

    I suspect it will be the sort of consecutive sentence that the US loves to hand out so probably 60 years in jail.
    Good. We should embrace consecutive sentences in this country too.

    Its beyond a joke that a criminal can commit as many crimes as they like and they'll only ever risk sentencing for one of them, if that.
    The joke is that length of sentence is a red herring. More important are getting caught and then convicted and tried quickly. Not getting away with it, or being out on bail for two years awaiting trial, which feels like getting away with it.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    londoneye said:

    On topic.

    Death penalty for these morons, these fuckers are denying the jab to people who need it, they have blood on their hands.

    Absolute [naughty word that OGH bans people for using.]

    i think you are getting a bit carried away there pal
    Maybe you're right. The death penalty is a bit too much. Instead they can die a slow agonising death in the ICU.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,270

    The judge has just adjourned court for the day. No sentencing date has been set yet.

    NY Times

    Deciding whether her sentence is billions or just millions of years.

    I wonder if her suicide watch will be any better than that for her man?
    40 years for one of the charges.

    She is 60.
    BBC suggesting the sentences are likely to be cumulative
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,599

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Scott_xP said:

    GUARDIAN: Hospitals urged to find space for 4000 extra beds as cases surge #TomorrowsPapersToday https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1476316165735657482/photo/1

    Yep, as mentioned by me earlier. Better than the first Nightingales, but staffing is the critical bit...
    Can we have unvaccinated patients treated by unvaccinated staff in the tents please?
    By treated, do you mean occasional cups of broth?
    The broth may go cold and lose its efficacy in a tent in a Leicester January.
    Not at current day time temperatures!!
    Yes, quite balmy here. Monsoon too..
  • Options

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Mind you Sky News have Terry-Thomas on.


  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Scott_xP said:

    GUARDIAN: Hospitals urged to find space for 4000 extra beds as cases surge #TomorrowsPapersToday https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1476316165735657482/photo/1

    Yep, as mentioned by me earlier. Better than the first Nightingales, but staffing is the critical bit...
    Can we have unvaccinated patients treated by unvaccinated staff in the tents please?
    By treated, do you mean occasional cups of broth?
    The broth may go cold and lose its efficacy in a tent in a Leicester January.
    Then you pep it up with a topping of Jif. Obviously.
  • Options
    londoneye said:

    On topic.

    Death penalty for these morons, these fuckers are denying the jab to people who need it, they have blood on their hands.

    Absolute [naughty word that OGH bans people for using.]

    i think you are getting a bit carried away there pal
    Nope, death penalty for antivaxxers.
  • Options
    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look
  • Options
    MattW said:

    eek said:

    The judge has just adjourned court for the day. No sentencing date has been set yet.

    NY Times

    Deciding whether her sentence is billions or just millions of years.

    I wonder if her suicide watch will be any better than that for her man?
    40 years for one of the charges.

    She is 60.
    I don’t think it makes any difference she’s been found guilty and will be spending the rest of her life in prison.

    I suspect it will be the sort of consecutive sentence that the US loves to hand out so probably 60 years in jail.
    Good. We should embrace consecutive sentences in this country too.

    Its beyond a joke that a criminal can commit as many crimes as they like and they'll only ever risk sentencing for one of them, if that.
    We already do. The court has discretion within guidelines.

    eg https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/overarching-guides/magistrates-court/item/totality/

    I'm not too impressed by that.

    I had my home broken into while I was in bed and I chased the burglar out of the house catching his reg-plate as he drove off. He'd broken in via damaging a window in the kitchen and left muddy boot prints which the CSI said were as good as fingerprints. He was caught red-handed the next week in another home and confessed to my break-in, the one he was caught in, and 18 others. Had many prior convictions for burglary and had only just been released from prison a few months before breaking into my home. Was sentenced to . . . a suspended jail sentence. Farcical!

    I'm willing to hazard a guess if I tracked down the magistrates home and broken into that and was caught red-handed I'd have got more than a suspended sentence for that.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,390
    edited December 2021
    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour of persecuting ethnic minorities.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,971
    edited December 2021
    Eabhal said:

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
    I was called an anti-vaxxer here for pointing out that constant boosters for younger people isn't necessarily in their personal interest.

    Side effects + travel time/time off work make it borderline at the very least.
    Eek twin b was boostered yesterday. it took a total of 5 minutes at a walk in clinic within Grainger market, Newcastle.

    We only knew it was on when we discovered the market was closed to the general public as I wanted to see what shoes Scorpio shoes had.
  • Options
    Charles said:

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

    This isn't permanent though, its Covid restrictions. Countries have closed their borders completely regardless of treaties.
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    You seem to be drunk, and you are almost certainly someone else anyway. I recommend reclaiming your own health while there is still time
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660
    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,898
    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Kids dying outside ICU is "not a good look".
  • Options
    FairlieredFairliered Posts: 3,976

    I was about to go to bed but BREAKING: Jury reaches verdict in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

    All good people are in bed by ten o'clockJim Callaghan. Ghislaine Maxwell
    FTFY
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    IshmaelZ said:

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    You seem to be drunk, and you are almost certainly someone else anyway. I recommend reclaiming your own health while there is still time
    Are the death squads on the street already? Bloody hell, Johnson got his act together fast.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Alan Dershowitz is another example of someone who used to seem sane and sensible. Then, in the era of Trump, become/revelaved to be a weird, demented parody of the earlier version.

    See Rudy Giuliani et al...
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,971
    MattW said:

    Charles said:

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

    I think this is just Macron being a twat again, assuming the allegation is true.

    Blocking the UK, when Belgium had had case rates twice as high as our peak at that point for weeks was the action of a kneejerking numpty.
    The point is that thanks to Brexit he can block the British with none of the problems blocking other EU countries would create.
  • Options

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour persecuting ethnic minorities.
    so you are outing yourself as a racist then...there are others too like leon who in his fervour to punish the unvaxxed while i am sure he is not racist does not seem to respect cultural sensitivities
  • Options
    I'm off to bed, can someone let me know if anybody starts posting about the vaccine killing scores of airline pilots.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,599

    londoneye said:

    On topic.

    Death penalty for these morons, these fuckers are denying the jab to people who need it, they have blood on their hands.

    Absolute [naughty word that OGH bans people for using.]

    i think you are getting a bit carried away there pal
    Nope, death penalty for antivaxxers.
    To an extent that is already true. In this interesting study, vaccinated people die less of non covid illnesses too.

    https://twitter.com/foxinsoxuk/status/1475827926235062277?t=hQ_oTpr7ELMisEdAnwUkPQ&s=19
  • Options
    FairlieredFairliered Posts: 3,976

    darkage said:

    RobD said:

    OT loss of our heritage. The SS Richard Montgomery is to be made safe. That's the shipwreck stuffed full of bombs, hundreds of tons of them, off Sheerness (and seeing it is probably the main reason for going to Sheerness). Soon there will be nothing to see once they've removed its masts (as it is feared they might collapse on to the explosives below).
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/29/sunken-warship-river-thames-explosives-board-could-cause-mass/ (£££)

    Tom Scott video (not paywalled):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9u41aeItss

    Hm, I think the headline is a bit misleading. All they are doing is removing the masts. The bombs will still be there, waiting.
    Strange. At least with the masts poking out of the sea, and the 'danger' signs on them; people know exactly where the wreck is and to avoid it. It seems that by moving them there would be a greater chance that the wreck is disturbed.
    The actual process of removing them sounds quite risky too.
    Could the whole ship be carefully removed to somewhere safer? Like Calais?
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour of persecuting ethnic minorities.
    Yeah, fuck em. Cracking pretext, anti vaxxers or not.
  • Options
    turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 15,176
    RobD said:

    londoneye said:

    On topic.

    Death penalty for these morons, these fuckers are denying the jab to people who need it, they have blood on their hands.

    Absolute [naughty word that OGH bans people for using.]

    i think you are getting a bit carried away there pal
    Maybe you're right. The death penalty is a bit too much. Instead they can die a slow agonising death in the ICU.
    No, in a tent, in the car park. With hot Cold broth piped up their arseholes...
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660
    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Not too many ethnic minorities among that bunch of idiots in the thread header video, just saying.
  • Options

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    15 million jabs to freedom remember that....
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Alan Dershowitz is another example of someone who used to seem sane and sensible. Then, in the era of Trump, become/revelaved to be a weird, demented parody of the earlier version.

    See Rudy Giuliani et al...
    And about a quarter of all Americans
  • Options

    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour persecuting ethnic minorities.
    so you are outing yourself as a racist then...there are others too like leon who in his fervour to punish the unvaxxed while i am sure he is not racist does not seem to respect cultural sensitivities
    Absolutely, I'm also Islamophobic, proud of it.
    You're as Islamophobic as you are a pineapple pizza lover I'm sure.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Eabhal said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Kids dying outside ICU is "not a good look".
    A number of the anti-vax memes that are being spread by said minorities are, very, very racist.

    Is that a good look, or a bad one?
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    No. But on the flipside we were told so many times in the original 2 jab rollout that vaccine uptake was much better than public health and government ever expected it to be, indeed, "wildly so", I think was the standard phrase. So on the other hand to complain about the percentage of unvaccinated is - in that context - a bit strange.

    There's nothing wrong with striving for even more, but there's a pretty natural ceiling, unless you get much more drastic than vaccine passports to get into a football match or nightclub.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,957
    eek said:

    Eabhal said:

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
    I was called an anti-vaxxer here for pointing out that constant boosters for younger people isn't necessarily in their personal interest.

    Side effects + travel time/time off work make it borderline at the very least.
    Eek twin b was boostered yesterday. it took a total of 5 minutes at a walk in clinic within Grainger market, Newcastle.

    We only knew it was on when we discovered the market was closed to the general public as I wanted to see what shoes Scorpio shoes had.
    Grainger Market is closed?
    I'm headed to Toon tomorrow for the first time in over 3 weeks.
    Whatever will I do?
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,898
    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour persecuting ethnic minorities.
    so you are outing yourself as a racist then...there are others too like leon who in his fervour to punish the unvaxxed while i am sure he is not racist does not seem to respect cultural sensitivities
    Mate, vaccines have been made available to all and huge efforts have been made to reach out to minority groups.

    Black people in particular are right to be suspicious of government healthcare given atrocities in the past. But a line has to be drawn somewhere.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    dixiedean said:

    That crowd looks a lot whiter and less vegan than your average anti-vaxxers.

    The particular class of immature minds in the header, based on the bobble hats, placards, and fear is control strike me as hard left, lefty libertarians, likely readers of spiked which pander to their immature undeveloped brains.

    Like their fellow idiots who stormed the capitol building they are daft enough to show their faces, so hit them through the courts of our democratic society.
  • Options
    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    I'm from an ethnic minority, and I got jabbed in April, in June, and a couple of weeks ago.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660

    darkage said:

    RobD said:

    OT loss of our heritage. The SS Richard Montgomery is to be made safe. That's the shipwreck stuffed full of bombs, hundreds of tons of them, off Sheerness (and seeing it is probably the main reason for going to Sheerness). Soon there will be nothing to see once they've removed its masts (as it is feared they might collapse on to the explosives below).
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/29/sunken-warship-river-thames-explosives-board-could-cause-mass/ (£££)

    Tom Scott video (not paywalled):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9u41aeItss

    Hm, I think the headline is a bit misleading. All they are doing is removing the masts. The bombs will still be there, waiting.
    Strange. At least with the masts poking out of the sea, and the 'danger' signs on them; people know exactly where the wreck is and to avoid it. It seems that by moving them there would be a greater chance that the wreck is disturbed.
    The actual process of removing them sounds quite risky too.
    Could the whole ship be carefully removed to somewhere safer? Like Calais?
    Good luck filling out the post-Brexit paperwork on that one 😬
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,270
    Lol, it looks like Johnson’s cited stat about 90% of people in hospital ICUs being unboosted was essentially made up, based on a few conversations he’d had with a few random hospital staff rather than any actual analysis.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    I'm from an ethnic minority, and I got jabbed in April, in June, and a couple of weeks ago.
    Yebbut... only in your arm - there's a huge proportion of you not vaccinated.
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,898

    Eabhal said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Kids dying outside ICU is "not a good look".
    A number of the anti-vax memes that are being spread by said minorities are, very, very racist.

    Is that a good look, or a bad one?
    You've lost me there.
  • Options

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Not too many ethnic minorities among that bunch of idiots in the thread header video, just saying.
    no not in the hard core activist groups but a huge proportion of the unvaxxed. Also i have heard that the blacks were cheeringbthe piers corbyn types as they marched through their communities
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    IanB2 said:

    Lol, it looks like Johnson’s cited stat about 90% of people in hospital ICUs being unboosted was essentially made up, based on a few conversations he’d had with a few random hospital staff rather than any actual analysis.

    He said "up to 90%", so technically accurate as long as it isn't higher. ;)
  • Options
    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    Not too many ethnic minorities among that bunch of idiots in the thread header video, just saying.
    no not in the hard core activist groups but a huge proportion of the unvaxxed. Also i have heard that the blacks were cheeringbthe piers corbyn types as they marched through their communities
    The blacks were doing the cheering were they?

    And then everyone on the bus cheered afterwards too I bet!
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Farooq said:

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Alan Dershowitz is another example of someone who used to seem sane and sensible. Then, in the era of Trump, become/revelaved to be a weird, demented parody of the earlier version.

    See Rudy Giuliani et al...
    And about a quarter of all Americans
    In a way. But a number of the victims of this syndrome once seemed educated, intelligent etc. Trumpism seems to have caused their brains to decay or something.
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    I'm from an ethnic minority, and I got jabbed in April, in June, and a couple of weeks ago.
    Yebbut... only in your arm - there's a huge proportion of you not vaccinated.
    If there's one person that can transport innoculation from his arm to the rest of his body it'll be Sunil.
  • Options
    carnforthcarnforth Posts: 3,199
    eek said:

    MattW said:

    Charles said:

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

    I think this is just Macron being a twat again, assuming the allegation is true.

    Blocking the UK, when Belgium had had case rates twice as high as our peak at that point for weeks was the action of a kneejerking numpty.
    The point is that thanks to Brexit he can block the British with none of the problems blocking other EU countries would create.
    Or, to look at it the other way around, France’s membership of the EU is making it politically difficult for them protect their population by blocking other EU countries such as Belgium.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660

    dixiedean said:

    That crowd looks a lot whiter and less vegan than your average anti-vaxxers.

    The particular class of immature minds in the header, based on the bobble hats, placards, and fear is control strike me as hard left, lefty libertarians, likely readers of spiked which pander to their immature undeveloped brains.

    Like their fellow idiots who stormed the capitol building they are daft enough to show their faces, so hit them through the courts of our democratic society.
    Well we each jump to our own conclusions.

    I had them down as Brexity UKIP types. I freely admit that's my bias, I have no evidence.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,582
    edited December 2021
    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    This is one of the most silly posts I've ever read on here. It shouldn't make any difference what ethnicity they are when it comes to describing their stupid decision.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Scott_xP said:

    I am reassured by the PB Brain Trust that BoZo is completely on top of things.

    There is nothing to see here, and no cause for alarm.

    Maybe he can even figure out where he was for the last 10 days..?

    Having now watched the interview question I am perfectly content that he was in the UK. See how his tanned face shows no confusion, hesitation or embarrassment when he instantly replies "in this country".

    Only traitors would look at his face, his body language and hear his stuttering eventual answer and conclude that he fucked off to Mustique.
    Quite frankly I couldn’t give a shit if he’s been in Mustique, or anywhere else over Christmas. No travel restrictions from this end, so who cares.
    Now if he’s lied about it, then that’s different. I mean why? Why lie?
    At a guess, Boris is telling the truth he has been in this country but if at Chequers (where PMs normally spend Christmas) and/or Downing Street for ten days, he could have said. So what is there to hide? Partying with squillionaire Tory donors?
    Most likely staying with friends somewhere & they asked him not to say as they don’t want the publicity. He remembered halfway through his answer
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    Andy_JS said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    This is one of the most silly posts I've ever read on here. So if most of the antivaxxers were white it would be okay to persecute them but because they're from ethnic minorities it isn't. It shouldn't matter what ethnicity they are.
    Yeah, they are idiots regardless.
  • Options
    Eabhal said:

    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    True, I'm in favour persecuting ethnic minorities.
    so you are outing yourself as a racist then...there are others too like leon who in his fervour to punish the unvaxxed while i am sure he is not racist does not seem to respect cultural sensitivities
    Mate, vaccines have been made available to all and huge efforts have been made to reach out to minority groups.

    Black people in particular are right to be suspicious of government healthcare given atrocities in the past. But a line has to be drawn somewhere.
    maybe which is why there needs to be more understanding of the black community and their concerns in comments on here.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,270
    edited December 2021
    RobD said:

    IanB2 said:

    Lol, it looks like Johnson’s cited stat about 90% of people in hospital ICUs being unboosted was essentially made up, based on a few conversations he’d had with a few random hospital staff rather than any actual analysis.

    He said "up to 90%", so technically accurate as long as it isn't higher. ;)
    He should have said ‘up to £350m a week’
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,971
    dixiedean said:

    eek said:

    Eabhal said:

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
    I was called an anti-vaxxer here for pointing out that constant boosters for younger people isn't necessarily in their personal interest.

    Side effects + travel time/time off work make it borderline at the very least.
    Eek twin b was boostered yesterday. it took a total of 5 minutes at a walk in clinic within Grainger market, Newcastle.

    We only knew it was on when we discovered the market was closed to the general public as I wanted to see what shoes Scorpio shoes had.
    Grainger Market is closed?
    I'm headed to Toon tomorrow for the first time in over 3 weeks.
    Whatever will I do?
    Was open today, they used it Monday and Tuesday as an additional vaccination site (I suspect centre for life was closed).
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    dixiedean said:

    eek said:

    Eabhal said:

    To be clear, I am absolutely against people remaining un-vaccinated against COVID, and I've been vaccinated fully. That said, I don't want this to develop into a situation where the geniuses behind Britain's public health think they can use me as a pin cushion every few months for anything going. One doesn't need to subscribe to a nefarious plot to see that as something to be avoided - simple incompetence makes it a bad idea.

    Yes, we must use the vaccines where needed, and thank God for them. But the main focus belongs on us reclaiming our own health, not on jabbing.

    I agree with this. Though some people immediately and somewhat ridiculously equate this sort of point with anti-vax sentiment.
    I was called an anti-vaxxer here for pointing out that constant boosters for younger people isn't necessarily in their personal interest.

    Side effects + travel time/time off work make it borderline at the very least.
    Eek twin b was boostered yesterday. it took a total of 5 minutes at a walk in clinic within Grainger market, Newcastle.

    We only knew it was on when we discovered the market was closed to the general public as I wanted to see what shoes Scorpio shoes had.
    Grainger Market is closed?
    I'm headed to Toon tomorrow for the first time in over 3 weeks.
    Whatever will I do?
    Get yerself a german doner kebab
  • Options
    "Pilots Larry Visoski and Dave Rodgers both said the door to the passenger cabin on the Lolita Express was closed at all times so they didn't know what was going on."

    Mail
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    IanB2 said:

    RobD said:

    IanB2 said:

    Lol, it looks like Johnson’s cited stat about 90% of people in hospital ICUs being unboosted was essentially made up, based on a few conversations he’d had with a few random hospital staff rather than any actual analysis.

    He said "up to 90%", so technically accurate as long as it isn't higher. ;)
    He should have said ‘up to £350m a week’
    In the Sky News report I just read he was clear that the number was based on conversations he had that day. You are right though, it would be much more interesting to see the actual statistics.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,660
    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    15 million jabs to freedom remember that....
    No.

    Btw, just to help you. All those posters on here going along with your 'racist' theme are most assuredly not racist but are in fact winding you up.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373

    dixiedean said:

    That crowd looks a lot whiter and less vegan than your average anti-vaxxers.

    The particular class of immature minds in the header, based on the bobble hats, placards, and fear is control strike me as hard left, lefty libertarians, likely readers of spiked which pander to their immature undeveloped brains.

    Like their fellow idiots who stormed the capitol building they are daft enough to show their faces, so hit them through the courts of our democratic society.
    For some reason, this reminds me of the story of a Social Democrat who recognised the SA guy beating him up, as a former Communist.

    My advice is to drink more.
  • Options
    Andy_JS said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    This is one of the most silly posts I've ever read on here. It shouldn't make any difference what ethnicity they are when it comes to describing their stupid decision.
    no it wouldnt even if they were all white. But demonising huge numbervof ethnic minorities especially when many of you are highly educated is not a good look
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    @rcs1000 whoops!
  • Options
    pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,132

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    No. But on the flipside we were told so many times in the original 2 jab rollout that vaccine uptake was much better than public health and government ever expected it to be, indeed, "wildly so", I think was the standard phrase. So on the other hand to complain about the percentage of unvaccinated is - in that context - a bit strange.

    There's nothing wrong with striving for even more, but there's a pretty natural ceiling, unless you get much more drastic than vaccine passports to get into a football match or nightclub.
    But, nonetheless, if we start to have really serious problems with hospital critical care capacity getting bunged up with people who have refused the vaccines, and our European neighbours start resorting to effective compulsion (not literally holding people down and sticking needles into them, but making their lives very difficult indeed without vaccine certification,) there may be considerable pressure to follow here as well.

    If we end up with another round of Draconian restrictions, and the mass of the people successfully deduce that they're being imposed to resolve a problem caused by the wilfully unvaccinated, the public mood is unlikely to be especially forgiving of them. Drastic measures, such as those apparently being contemplated in Italy, might then be put on the table.
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775

    Farooq said:

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Alan Dershowitz is another example of someone who used to seem sane and sensible. Then, in the era of Trump, become/revelaved to be a weird, demented parody of the earlier version.

    See Rudy Giuliani et al...
    And about a quarter of all Americans
    In a way. But a number of the victims of this syndrome once seemed educated, intelligent etc. Trumpism seems to have caused their brains to decay or something.
    Intelligence is no antidote to madness, and nor is it reliably destroyed by madness.
    They can exist side by side, the Dr Jekyll showing himself when the Mr Hyde sleeps.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373

    londoneye said:

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    15 million jabs to freedom remember that....
    No.

    Btw, just to help you. All those posters on here going along with your 'racist' theme are most assuredly not racist but are in fact winding you up.
    Darn it. I was waiting for the bit where TSE pulls his leg long enough that it actually falls off.....
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    Errr... PB may be down temporarily, as I've just realised that I haven't renewed our SSL certificate and it expires in... 58 minutes...

    Sorry for any inconvenience.

    You might want to look into the Russian bot spam trap while its down, it seems to have let another one through.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    londoneye said:

    Andy_JS said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    This is one of the most silly posts I've ever read on here. It shouldn't make any difference what ethnicity they are when it comes to describing their stupid decision.
    no it wouldnt even if they were all white. But demonising huge numbervof ethnic minorities especially when many of you are highly educated is not a good look
    Why should they be treated any differently? The vaccine is available both freely and in a multitude of locations. Vaccine refusers have had every opportunity to have it.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,599

    "Pilots Larry Visoski and Dave Rodgers both said the door to the passenger cabin on the Lolita Express was closed at all times so they didn't know what was going on."

    Mail

    Deserving the Mandy Rice Davies response...
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,957

    dixiedean said:

    That crowd looks a lot whiter and less vegan than your average anti-vaxxers.

    The particular class of immature minds in the header, based on the bobble hats, placards, and fear is control strike me as hard left, lefty libertarians, likely readers of spiked which pander to their immature undeveloped brains.

    Like their fellow idiots who stormed the capitol building they are daft enough to show their faces, so hit them through the courts of our democratic society.
    You can tell they are lefties by looking at them?
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,505
    eek said:

    MattW said:

    Charles said:

    eek said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    ydoethur said:

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    The same people that said Delta was nothing to worry about, are those that are saying Omicron is nothing to worry about.

    So is anyone who said Delta was nothing to worry about, going to stick their head up and say this is different

    Who said Delta is nothing to worry about?
    I don't recall you calling for a lockdown when Delta was around, we didn't need one was what you and several others said. I remember arguing with you about it
    That's not the same thing, is it?
    My point is you were wrong then and so I am interested in people that did call for a lockdown then who don't think there is anything to worry about now.

    What I am hearing now is the same people that initially said "nothing to worry about" then said "lockdown isn't needed" then said "lockdown 2.0 isn't needed". It's the same people
    You keep making these massive sweeping generalisations.
    I have generally preferred not to make generalisations.

    And with that, good night.
    But the French elite are so paranoid about Brexit, so allergic to it and fearful of it, they set a low bar for its success. Britain surviving intact and not starving to death will probably seem quite successful to them. given their direful predictions of total British implosion.

    Then the next time the EU does something widely unpopular, eurosceptics across the continent will start to look longingly at independent London.

    This is the great French fear. By this guy's account it does stalk their nightmares.
    The French are trying to restrict travel to essential only.
    By blocking British residents of Belgium or the Netherlands who want to use EuroTunnel and transit France?
    Are the blocking British? Or just anyone who isn't EU/Schengen?
    Travel from the UK to France

    URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU

    Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.


    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travelling-with-us/latest/covid-19/#foca
    Exactly. They aren't treating us differently. They're applying the 3rd country rules which our government demanded be imposed upon us.
    What’s the warning

    Be careful what you wish for - it may become true.
    I don't understand the complaints. What did they think "3rd country" meant? This is what they demanded and they've succeeded in being treated thus.

    Just wait until next week when the usual suspects try and blame the French for our lack of Border Control Posts, staff or computers.
    Except the rights of British citizens with legal residency in the EU that pre-dates Brexit have their rights protected by treaty.

    I think this is just Macron being a twat again, assuming the allegation is true.

    Blocking the UK, when Belgium had had case rates twice as high as our peak at that point for weeks was the action of a kneejerking numpty.
    The point is that thanks to Brexit he can block the British with none of the problems blocking other EU countries would create.
    I have no particular problem with that in a pandemic situation. Far better that a border can be closed for protection than it be forced to stay open increasing the risk as in eg Fr-Be or Fr-Lu, and in effect meaning that restrictions have to be imposed over a far larger populace, or extra people have to die for the sake of open borders.

    But that's not what it looks like in this case. He seems to be violating Schengen.

    Which is about Macron not even being able to get this right.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Andy_JS said:

    londoneye said:

    we all have to remember a huge proportion of antivaxxers are from ethnic minorities. Many posters on here seem tobadvocate persecuting these people. Im not suggesting these posters are racist but its not a good look

    This is one of the most silly posts I've ever read on here. It shouldn't make any difference what ethnicity they are when it comes to describing their stupid decision.
    Why? - it's basic identity matrix theory.

    If you are from the right parts of the matrix, you have the right to be a dribbling racist loon. If you aren't, you don't.
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775
    dixiedean said:

    dixiedean said:

    That crowd looks a lot whiter and less vegan than your average anti-vaxxers.

    The particular class of immature minds in the header, based on the bobble hats, placards, and fear is control strike me as hard left, lefty libertarians, likely readers of spiked which pander to their immature undeveloped brains.

    Like their fellow idiots who stormed the capitol building they are daft enough to show their faces, so hit them through the courts of our democratic society.
    You can tell they are lefties by looking at them?
    Polo-neck jumpers. That, and good circulation.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,505
    rcs1000 said:

    Errr... PB may be down temporarily, as I've just realised that I haven't renewed our SSL certificate and it expires in... 58 minutes...

    Sorry for any inconvenience.

    Do you have to give Brussels two weeks notice?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,957
    IanB2 said:

    Lol, it looks like Johnson’s cited stat about 90% of people in hospital ICUs being unboosted was essentially made up, based on a few conversations he’d had with a few random hospital staff rather than any actual analysis.

    Are you implying he makes up bollocks off the top of his head?
    Well, I never.
  • Options
    pigeon said:

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    No. But on the flipside we were told so many times in the original 2 jab rollout that vaccine uptake was much better than public health and government ever expected it to be, indeed, "wildly so", I think was the standard phrase. So on the other hand to complain about the percentage of unvaccinated is - in that context - a bit strange.

    There's nothing wrong with striving for even more, but there's a pretty natural ceiling, unless you get much more drastic than vaccine passports to get into a football match or nightclub.
    But, nonetheless, if we start to have really serious problems with hospital critical care capacity getting bunged up with people who have refused the vaccines, and our European neighbours start resorting to effective compulsion (not literally holding people down and sticking needles into them, but making their lives very difficult indeed without vaccine certification,) there may be considerable pressure to follow here as well.

    If we end up with another round of Draconian restrictions, and the mass of the people successfully deduce that they're being imposed to resolve a problem caused by the wilfully unvaccinated, the public mood is unlikely to be especially forgiving of them. Drastic measures, such as those apparently being contemplated in Italy, might then be put on the table.
    i can tell you are getting excited just thinking about it. It seems with you pigeon rationality has left the building...and you seem particularly insensitive to ethnic minorities
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,373
    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.

    https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1476319449447907344

    Looks like an awful misjudgement by the BBC tbf.
    Alan Dershowitz is another example of someone who used to seem sane and sensible. Then, in the era of Trump, become/revelaved to be a weird, demented parody of the earlier version.

    See Rudy Giuliani et al...
    And about a quarter of all Americans
    In a way. But a number of the victims of this syndrome once seemed educated, intelligent etc. Trumpism seems to have caused their brains to decay or something.
    Intelligence is no antidote to madness, and nor is it reliably destroyed by madness.
    They can exist side by side, the Dr Jekyll showing himself when the Mr Hyde sleeps.
    Indeed. But watching these people turning into dribbling, weird, devolved parodies of their former selves.....
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623
    pigeon said:

    londoneye said:

    Nigelb said:

    darkage said:

    This is a consequence of trying to force people in to getting vaccinated. You can get some people to comply, but then it hardens the views of a another small minority who become consumed by conspiracy theories like these people.

    No, it’s not.
    The anti vaxxers have been full on conspiracy nonsense for a long, long time.
    fact is mate tryingvto force people to be vaxxed just feeds conspiracies. 90 percent vaxxed remember when it was enough to vaccinate the vulnerable...maybe you dont
    What rot. It was never 'enough' to vaccinate the vulnerable - please show some evidence that it was; it was always the case that the vulnerable were rightly vaccinated first.
    No. But on the flipside we were told so many times in the original 2 jab rollout that vaccine uptake was much better than public health and government ever expected it to be, indeed, "wildly so", I think was the standard phrase. So on the other hand to complain about the percentage of unvaccinated is - in that context - a bit strange.

    There's nothing wrong with striving for even more, but there's a pretty natural ceiling, unless you get much more drastic than vaccine passports to get into a football match or nightclub.
    But, nonetheless, if we start to have really serious problems with hospital critical care capacity getting bunged up with people who have refused the vaccines, and our European neighbours start resorting to effective compulsion (not literally holding people down and sticking needles into them, but making their lives very difficult indeed without vaccine certification,) there may be considerable pressure to follow here as well.

    If we end up with another round of Draconian restrictions, and the mass of the people successfully deduce that they're being imposed to resolve a problem caused by the wilfully unvaccinated, the public mood is unlikely to be especially forgiving of them. Drastic measures, such as those apparently being contemplated in Italy, might then be put on the table.
    Essentially that's why I asked earlier tonight what relative protection someone getting jab 1 tomorrow would have versus someone getting jab 3. Is it too late for the anti-vaxxers anyway essentially because they would need the time to get all 3 jabs done, or is the recency of the booster the driving benefit rather than the fact it's the third dose?
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,582
    "Sam Merriman
    @smrmerriman
    @BBCNews has on to provide ‘analysis’ following the Ghislaine Maxwell verdict is Alan Dershowitz - who is himself accused of abusing one of Epstein’s alleged victims.

    He then used the entire ‘interview’ to attack his accuser. Appalling stuff."

    https://twitter.com/smrmerriman/status/1476323078867197952
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,599
    rcs1000 said:

    Errr... PB may be down temporarily, as I've just realised that I haven't renewed our SSL certificate and it expires in... 58 minutes...

    Sorry for any inconvenience.

    I thought that I had finished the cold turkey.
This discussion has been closed.