There is no process. The recent debacle in the Supreme Court confirmed that things "related to" a reserved issue fell within it. She cannot enable a referendum.
Of course, there are in my view compelling tactical reasons why the UK government should not stand in her way and allow this and a strong democratic argument that it would be wrong to do so. But there is no process and she has no control over the timetable. She's a fantasist. Not quite in the same league as Kate Forbes but a fantasist all the same.
IIRC there was a two year window from the Edinburgh agreement and indyref1.
For immunocompromised people. Three doses should be considered their primary course, 4th shot is the booster for them, 3 months after their third shot. Their arms will look like pincushions.
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
If Tice does well what will the (no doubt still victorious) Tories take as a lesson from the result:
- We need to be even tougher on asylum seekers - We need to stop mask mandates and avoid any talk of lockdowns - We should cut taxes?
All 3 of those are conceivable reasons for a voter in Bexley to put a cross in the Reform box - the first because its antecedents include UKIP and the Brexit Party, the second because of its actual policy platform, or the 3rd by some wider interpretation of a vote for a Thatcherite/Poujadist businessman in a Southern seat.
"Save our boilers!"
There's actually a whole catalogue of selectively crowd pleasing policies where a true poujadist party could make hay with a certain part of the middle aged male vote. Cut the extortionate fuel duty, no more annoying speed bumps, get rid of road-narrowing cycle lanes (and the bus lanes while they're at it), ditch those mad health and safety rules, bring anything you want to the tip, liberalise those pesky building regs etc.
Surprised that Reform are not going big on 'No Gents in the Ladies!"
There is no process. The recent debacle in the Supreme Court confirmed that things "related to" a reserved issue fell within it. She cannot enable a referendum.
Of course, there are in my view compelling tactical reasons why the UK government should not stand in her way and allow this and a strong democratic argument that it would be wrong to do so. But there is no process and she has no control over the timetable. She's a fantasist. Not quite in the same league as Kate Forbes but a fantasist all the same.
The process is "can I have a referendum please" and being told "no".
There is no process. The recent debacle in the Supreme Court confirmed that things "related to" a reserved issue fell within it. She cannot enable a referendum.
Of course, there are in my view compelling tactical reasons why the UK government should not stand in her way and allow this and a strong democratic argument that it would be wrong to do so. But there is no process and she has no control over the timetable. She's a fantasist. Not quite in the same league as Kate Forbes but a fantasist all the same.
Gotta throw those scraps of red meat to the loyal SNP fan base. Easy to promise something that essentially you can’t deliver - she’ll send Boris a letter, he’ll say no, she’ll complain about democracy
She won’t hold a referendum as risk of boycott too high. Round and round we go
If Cooper-Balls makes it to the shadow cabinet then can we confirm that the Starmer is a true Blairite and the next GE is Game On.
Fair point, but I note that you are another one who insists on calling a professional woman by her husband's name. Why? Did you refer to Ed Balls as Ed Cooper?
I guess I might refer to Ed as Balls-Cooper?
In all honesty my style guide says I do that so that so that PB casuals are aware of the connection.
"PB casuals"
I didn't realise that we had a hooligan firm associated with the site.
Do they organise fights with the Order-Order Service Crew?
No, we go to first class lounges of airports and trash them.
Ask Charles for the next dust up location and time.
No. no. no.
Private jet lounge.
First Class is full of Head Count, these days.
Lounge? You mean you don't get taken direct to the plane?
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
Embarrassing for everybody here who thought it real and said that’s a good idea. 🙂
Seriously. Thornberry. Yet another north London hand-wringer.
Could Starmer not find a midlander or northerner who shares the priorities of voters in the seats we need to win? We need to out-Priti Priti on home affairs, and show that we would succeed where she is failing.
A bad appointment.
This absolutely spot on. In one move alone votes lost where needed in Wales with no useful votes gained in London. Also silly for Labour to shadow home office with left winger, Nandy should do it being most right winger in cabinet.
I live in Wales and I couldn't tell you who or what Nick Thomas-Symonds looks or sounds like. And now I need never know.
To be honest I thought he was okay. It’s lazy on here to save he was completely rubbish. He dressed smart. He spoke sensibly and clearly. On the news a lot last week. Wasn’t horribly opportunist about the issues in the channel like Nandy was over the weekend. He looked like a safe pair of hands for government.
I pay way more attention to politics than about 90% of the population and if you had asked me this morning who the shadow Home Secretary was this morning I might have come up with Nick but no way I would have got the surname. Given that the Home Secretary is under the pump and, frankly, more than a tad obnoxious, that's not great.
I am sure that SKS wants people who can demand the attention of the media and sound punchy. He's right to the extent that is what opposition politicians need to do to be even noticed. Thornberry is not everyone's cup of tea but neither is Patel. She will certainly be heard.
I know what you are saying, but I think it’s wrong. Opposition shadows you get to hear about when they have made a mistake. It’s just not that easy, because what gets thrown at them whenever they attack in Parliament or in tv debate, what’s your policy then?
There is no real votes in attacking in opposition, only in laying out and explaining policy positions.
I still vividly remember a very young looking Tony Blair appearing on Newsnight on Black Wednesday. as City Minister. He showed a clear understanding of the problems, just the right amount of sympathy for Ministers in real difficulty and clear bullet point answers. The Cabinet Minister up with him looked a bumbling incompetent by comparison. I remember thinking I have just seen a political masterclass and this guy is going to be a real challenge. Thornberry is not close to that but she's still way better than the vast majority of the shadow cabinet.
I agree that being an attack dog is not enough but you need to show competence and a clear alternative, even if the details are (understandably) missing.
I've tried to find archive footage of that, to no avail. Easy to find Lamont in the dark though.
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
I don't see it's wise to mess around with Thornberry. Look where it got Nugee.
Supply will hold up. Delivery capacity ... let's see how that goes.
"All adults in the UK should be offered booster jabs from just three months after their second vaccinations as the government’s advisers speeded up the programme to limit the spread of the Omicron variant.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) announced that the waiting time was being cut for all adults, with priority for booking to be decided by the NHS."
Boosters for everyone after 3 months now - look forward to the details, sounds like a bun fight for bookings if true.
Need to get our appointments booked in ASAP!
Can confirm the website still tells you to **** off if too young.
I imagine it will get updated overnight tonight.
Sounds like they're going back to opening it up by age cohort rather than making 25m ellgible at once. Makes the 3 month gap a bit notional frankly unless you're only getting your 2nd jab today.
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
Embarrassing for everybody here who thought it real and said that’s a good idea. 🙂
But not for you, who's been commenting on her 'appointment' at great length, to tell us what a bad idea it is (isn't)?
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
For those watching the Labour shadow cabinet reshuffle fiendishly, it appears Nick Thomas-Symonds is being removed from Home Secretary, but will not be replaced by Emily Thornberry. Yvette Cooper is the obvious bet for that job... but only if she can be coaxed back. https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1465333022857875465
Clever of Starmer to spread a rumour about Emily Thornberry, just to see how the prospect of her being Shadow HS goes down with PB Tories who'd never vote Labour. He's getting cannier by the day.
Embarrassing for everybody here who thought it real and said that’s a good idea. 🙂
But not for you, who's been commenting on her 'appointment' at great length, to tell us what a bad idea it is (isn't)?
Yes. Pretti Patel is a lump of lard in a pan that’s heating up. No need to poke or mash it, just double check your recipe and method so you get your own lines right.
Seriously. Thornberry. Yet another north London hand-wringer.
Could Starmer not find a midlander or northerner who shares the priorities of voters in the seats we need to win? We need to out-Priti Priti on home affairs, and show that we would succeed where she is failing.
A bad appointment.
This absolutely spot on. In one move alone votes lost where needed in Wales with no useful votes gained in London. Also silly for Labour to shadow home office with left winger, Nandy should do it being most right winger in cabinet.
I live in Wales and I couldn't tell you who or what Nick Thomas-Symonds looks or sounds like. And now I need never know.
To be honest I thought he was okay. It’s lazy on here to save he was completely rubbish. He dressed smart. He spoke sensibly and clearly. On the news a lot last week. Wasn’t horribly opportunist about the issues in the channel like Nandy was over the weekend. He looked like a safe pair of hands for government.
I pay way more attention to politics than about 90% of the population and if you had asked me this morning who the shadow Home Secretary was this morning I might have come up with Nick but no way I would have got the surname. Given that the Home Secretary is under the pump and, frankly, more than a tad obnoxious, that's not great.
I am sure that SKS wants people who can demand the attention of the media and sound punchy. He's right to the extent that is what opposition politicians need to do to be even noticed. Thornberry is not everyone's cup of tea but neither is Patel. She will certainly be heard.
I know what you are saying, but I think it’s wrong. Opposition shadows you get to hear about when they have made a mistake. It’s just not that easy, because what gets thrown at them whenever they attack in Parliament or in tv debate, what’s your policy then?
There is no real votes in attacking in opposition, only in laying out and explaining policy positions.
I still vividly remember a very young looking Tony Blair appearing on Newsnight on Black Wednesday. as City Minister. He showed a clear understanding of the problems, just the right amount of sympathy for Ministers in real difficulty and clear bullet point answers. The Cabinet Minister up with him looked a bumbling incompetent by comparison. I remember thinking I have just seen a political masterclass and this guy is going to be a real challenge. Thornberry is not close to that but she's still way better than the vast majority of the shadow cabinet.
I agree that being an attack dog is not enough but you need to show competence and a clear alternative, even if the details are (understandably) missing.
I really like your post there David. The first rule of politics is not attack, just explain your position on issues. So you are measuring their talent in how well they communicate this. And acknowledging something had gone wrong not because your opposite number is stupid, but because some things that come up are difficult, is a master stroke in sounding fair and thoughtful. Attack merely siren Calls you down the stupid road Nandy choose to go down at the weekend. It’s leads to a dead end where you have lost the voters because you don’t actually have any answers. Boris knows it well, he is currently head butting the wall of that dead end.
Labour need policies and good calm communicators, not finger jabbers like Cooper or bruisers like maaaaaatron. 🤣
Cooper's cool as a cucumber. Very clever too. Her debit (imo) is a slight aura of 'take the punch bowl away before anybody has even arrived'. But if (as I hope) people are starting to tire of 'politics needs to be a good giggle' this won't be a debit at all.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
For those watching the Labour shadow cabinet reshuffle fiendishly, it appears Nick Thomas-Symonds is being removed from Home Secretary, but will not be replaced by Emily Thornberry. Yvette Cooper is the obvious bet for that job... but only if she can be coaxed back. https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1465333022857875465
I think Thornberry is a poor appointment, I would have had Yvette Cooper up against Priti Patel. Thornberry is exactly the kind of opponent Priti will want, someone she can paint as an out of touch liberal handwringing human rights loving lawyer who doesn't want to stop the boats but wants the UK to accept everyone and anyone and also encourage more boats.
The vast majority of people in the UK would like the boats to stop coming and for the UK to become a fortress, the Labour party should have seized on the government being out of step with the people, instead they've picked someone who will easily be painted as frustrating the efforts to stop the boats. I also think Thornberry is a liability and will try and imply that Priti Patel is racist or her parents could have been on the boats etc... which will go down extremely poorly with the country at large but get the twitter masturbators energised, further compounding Labour's policy and image problem on immigration.
Tom Newton Dunn saying Thornberry will not be shadow home secretary
Which makes sense, Labour should have come to the same conclusion I did.
I'd prefer Coops – she is completely wasted on the back benches.
Shades of dear old George Brown staggering his way around.
Seriously. Thornberry. Yet another north London hand-wringer.
Could Starmer not find a midlander or northerner who shares the priorities of voters in the seats we need to win? We need to out-Priti Priti on home affairs, and show that we would succeed where she is failing.
A bad appointment.
This absolutely spot on. In one move alone votes lost where needed in Wales with no useful votes gained in London. Also silly for Labour to shadow home office with left winger, Nandy should do it being most right winger in cabinet.
I live in Wales and I couldn't tell you who or what Nick Thomas-Symonds looks or sounds like. And now I need never know.
To be honest I thought he was okay. It’s lazy on here to save he was completely rubbish. He dressed smart. He spoke sensibly and clearly. On the news a lot last week. Wasn’t horribly opportunist about the issues in the channel like Nandy was over the weekend. He looked like a safe pair of hands for government.
I pay way more attention to politics than about 90% of the population and if you had asked me this morning who the shadow Home Secretary was this morning I might have come up with Nick but no way I would have got the surname. Given that the Home Secretary is under the pump and, frankly, more than a tad obnoxious, that's not great.
I am sure that SKS wants people who can demand the attention of the media and sound punchy. He's right to the extent that is what opposition politicians need to do to be even noticed. Thornberry is not everyone's cup of tea but neither is Patel. She will certainly be heard.
I know what you are saying, but I think it’s wrong. Opposition shadows you get to hear about when they have made a mistake. It’s just not that easy, because what gets thrown at them whenever they attack in Parliament or in tv debate, what’s your policy then?
There is no real votes in attacking in opposition, only in laying out and explaining policy positions.
I still vividly remember a very young looking Tony Blair appearing on Newsnight on Black Wednesday. as City Minister. He showed a clear understanding of the problems, just the right amount of sympathy for Ministers in real difficulty and clear bullet point answers. The Cabinet Minister up with him looked a bumbling incompetent by comparison. I remember thinking I have just seen a political masterclass and this guy is going to be a real challenge. Thornberry is not close to that but she's still way better than the vast majority of the shadow cabinet.
I agree that being an attack dog is not enough but you need to show competence and a clear alternative, even if the details are (understandably) missing.
I've tried to find archive footage of that, to no avail. Easy to find Lamont in the dark though.
Seriously. Thornberry. Yet another north London hand-wringer.
Could Starmer not find a midlander or northerner who shares the priorities of voters in the seats we need to win? We need to out-Priti Priti on home affairs, and show that we would succeed where she is failing.
A bad appointment.
This absolutely spot on. In one move alone votes lost where needed in Wales with no useful votes gained in London. Also silly for Labour to shadow home office with left winger, Nandy should do it being most right winger in cabinet.
I live in Wales and I couldn't tell you who or what Nick Thomas-Symonds looks or sounds like. And now I need never know.
To be honest I thought he was okay. It’s lazy on here to save he was completely rubbish. He dressed smart. He spoke sensibly and clearly. On the news a lot last week. Wasn’t horribly opportunist about the issues in the channel like Nandy was over the weekend. He looked like a safe pair of hands for government.
I pay way more attention to politics than about 90% of the population and if you had asked me this morning who the shadow Home Secretary was this morning I might have come up with Nick but no way I would have got the surname. Given that the Home Secretary is under the pump and, frankly, more than a tad obnoxious, that's not great.
I am sure that SKS wants people who can demand the attention of the media and sound punchy. He's right to the extent that is what opposition politicians need to do to be even noticed. Thornberry is not everyone's cup of tea but neither is Patel. She will certainly be heard.
I know what you are saying, but I think it’s wrong. Opposition shadows you get to hear about when they have made a mistake. It’s just not that easy, because what gets thrown at them whenever they attack in Parliament or in tv debate, what’s your policy then?
There is no real votes in attacking in opposition, only in laying out and explaining policy positions.
I still vividly remember a very young looking Tony Blair appearing on Newsnight on Black Wednesday. as City Minister. He showed a clear understanding of the problems, just the right amount of sympathy for Ministers in real difficulty and clear bullet point answers. The Cabinet Minister up with him looked a bumbling incompetent by comparison. I remember thinking I have just seen a political masterclass and this guy is going to be a real challenge. Thornberry is not close to that but she's still way better than the vast majority of the shadow cabinet.
I agree that being an attack dog is not enough but you need to show competence and a clear alternative, even if the details are (understandably) missing.
I really like your post there David. The first rule of politics is not attack, just explain your position on issues. So you are measuring their talent in how well they communicate this. And acknowledging something had gone wrong not because your opposite number is stupid, but because some things that come up are difficult, is a master stroke in sounding fair and thoughtful. Attack merely siren Calls you down the stupid road Nandy choose to go down at the weekend. It’s leads to a dead end where you have lost the voters because you don’t actually have any answers. Boris knows it well, he is currently head butting the wall of that dead end.
Labour need policies and good calm communicators, not finger jabbers like Cooper or bruisers like maaaaaatron. 🤣
Cooper's cool as a cucumber. Very clever too. Her debit (imo) is a slight aura of 'take the punch bowl away before anybody has even arrived'. But if (as I hope) people are starting to tire of 'politics needs to be a good giggle' this won't be a debit at all.
I am happy to learn. What did I actually say that was wrong in the first paragraph?
There is no process. The recent debacle in the Supreme Court confirmed that things "related to" a reserved issue fell within it. She cannot enable a referendum.
Of course, there are in my view compelling tactical reasons why the UK government should not stand in her way and allow this and a strong democratic argument that it would be wrong to do so. But there is no process and she has no control over the timetable. She's a fantasist. Not quite in the same league as Kate Forbes but a fantasist all the same.
Gotta throw those scraps of red meat to the loyal SNP fan base. Easy to promise something that essentially you can’t deliver - she’ll send Boris a letter, he’ll say no, she’ll complain about democracy
She won’t hold a referendum as risk of boycott too high. Round and round we go
I was watching remedial philosophy classes at the weekend, otherwise known as Spongebob Squarepants. Genius. In one of them Squidward goes to live in Squidsville with lots of people like him. All too soon the repetitive nature of life there bores him out of his mind and he wants to return to Spongebob and his idiotic childishness. Surely even SNP supporters are feeling the same way?
If Cooper-Balls makes it to the shadow cabinet then can we confirm that the Starmer is a true Blairite and the next GE is Game On.
Fair point, but I note that you are another one who insists on calling a professional woman by her husband's name. Why? Did you refer to Ed Balls as Ed Cooper?
I guess I might refer to Ed as Balls-Cooper?
In all honesty my style guide says I do that so that so that PB casuals are aware of the connection.
What's the relevance of the connection, though?
They're married.
HYUFD, is that you?
I'm aware of the nature of the connection (as I assume most PBers would be). Just to me the fact she's married to Ed Balls doesn't tell me anything other than she is married to Ed Balls. I judge her on her track record in politics, cabinet, shadow cabinet, failed leadership bid... (FWIW, I think she's a reasonably solid minister/shadow minister, don't think she'd be a good leader).
I'm not trying to get at you here, not bothered particularly that you did refer to her as Cooper-Balls. Just interested as to why you think it's relevant, as you seemed to think it was important to be aware of the connection..
Gov ministers don't have to come from MPs
If Carrie got appointed Home Sec would that bother you?
Now, with that, I do really need to go on my beer run.
I'm well aware of the first point.
On the second: that would be quite a different situation, though, would it not? I'd be more interested in the spousal connection if the person handing out the jobs was the spouse. If Ed Balls was Labour leader, I wouldn't question the relevance of pointing out that someone he appointed was his wife - it raises the question of possible favouritism, even if that might be unfounded. Would I be bothered? Not necessarily, in either case, but it would be right to point out the link. But Ed Balls is not even an MP any more - it seems unlikely that he's used his influence (what influence?) to get Cooper a post, if indeed she gets one.
Anyway, I'll leave you alone now. I was generally interested in the perception of relevance, but I don't think we're getting anywhere with that. Happy beer hunting
Boosters for everyone after 3 months now - look forward to the details, sounds like a bun fight for bookings if true.
They're going to need to average a million doses a day to get anywhere close to doing them by Christmas.
Will be delighted if they manage it and it could make all the difference. Big test of whether government can get arse into gear. Reaching the decision today, rather than next week as suggested at the weekend press conference, is a good start.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
Indeed. Quoting what one doctor has seen with a handful of patients is merely repeating someone's personal experience.
If Tice does well what will the (no doubt still victorious) Tories take as a lesson from the result:
- We need to be even tougher on asylum seekers - We need to stop mask mandates and avoid any talk of lockdowns - We should cut taxes?
All 3 of those are conceivable reasons for a voter in Bexley to put a cross in the Reform box - the first because its antecedents include UKIP and the Brexit Party, the second because of its actual policy platform, or the 3rd by some wider interpretation of a vote for a Thatcherite/Poujadist businessman in a Southern seat.
"Save our boilers!"
There's actually a whole catalogue of selectively crowd pleasing policies where a true poujadist party could make hay with a certain part of the middle aged male vote. Cut the extortionate fuel duty, no more annoying speed bumps, get rid of road-narrowing cycle lanes (and the bus lanes while they're at it), ditch those mad health and safety rules, bring anything you want to the tip, liberalise those pesky building regs etc.
Surprised that Reform are not going big on 'No Gents in the Ladies!"
Or are they?
Aiming for the low hanging fruit?
Yes, exactly. People probably know I'm (mainly) on the other side of this 'debate' - inverteds since there rarely is any to speak of - but it is undeniably fertile ground for a party of the reactionary right. Could pick up some votes without risking a single one the other way.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
Dr Leon and one or two others were rather reassured last night at the reporting from South Africa. I was very much hoping they were right as I have very much had enough of this Coronavirus b******s!
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Got to love the journlists...you said don't panic, but doesn't this mean we should be panicking.....
What's wrong with that? Of all possible cues that it is appropriate to panic, being told not to panic is pretty near the top. And indeed the explanation for cutting down the booster gap to 3 months is pretty much We are panicking so you don't have to.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
In fairness, it was quite the opposite – lots of shrill panic-mongering from the usual suspects.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
I don't think people were saying misquoted, rather nobody was giving the full context (nor explaining why a GP isn't in the best position to judge this), and that is now being spun as "fact".
e.g. the Telegraph is running a story that
Omicron Covid variant Q&A: How the symptoms differ and what protection vaccines offer
which again uses the same quote again, to make it sound like people know for certain the symptoms are different.
Boosters for everyone after 3 months now - look forward to the details, sounds like a bun fight for bookings if true.
They're going to need to average a million doses a day to get anywhere close to doing them by Christmas.
Will be delighted if they manage it and it could make all the difference. Big test of whether government can get arse into gear. Reaching the decision today, rather than next week as suggested at the weekend press conference, is a good start.
Yes, they will need to double up capacity from 2.5m per week to 5m per week to make a dent in the number of people who want it before Xmas. My guess is that we will end up doing about 42-44m booster shots from an eligible pool of 47m people with two doses. That leaves at least 25m to get done, I don't see us doing anything like 1m per day sustained but I think we could get to an average of 750k per day for the two weeks to Xmas.
I also hope they get cracking as I would very much like to get a booster shot before Xmas when my wife and I are staying with my parents for a few days now that our trip to Switzerland is officially off.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
In fairness, it was quite the opposite – lots of shrill panic-mongering from the usual suspects.
As I recall you were quite cool with it. And @Leon who went all, back to his bunker in Penarth mode, calmed down on the SA GP's news.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
I don't think people were saying misquoted, rather nobody was giving the full context (nor explaining why a GP isn't in the best position to judge this), and that is now being spun as "fact".
e.g. the Telegraph is running a story that
Omicron Covid variant Q&A: How the symptoms differ and what protection vaccines offer
which again uses the same quote again, to make it sound like people know for certain the symptoms are different.
The explanation why a GP isn't in the best position to judge this being...?
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I think the timing of Christmas is a factor here. If they wait two weeks for more data on Omicron then it's less than a fortnight until Christmas and the chance of being able to ramp up the booster programme before the new year is slim.
Got to love the journlists...you said don't panic, but doesn't this mean we should be panicking.....
I sense you'd prefer a world without them.
I prefer a world where journalists ask pertinent informed questions e.g. here is a good piece on the situation, where somebody has asked experts some very sensible questions.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
Dr Leon and one or two others were rather reassured last night at the reporting from South Africa. I was very much hoping they were right as I have very much had enough of this Coronavirus b******s!
Leon was reassured? He is doom-pornographer in chief, barely a minute goes by without another bout of hysterical hyperbole from him.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Well I don't blame her. But I'm talking about the flag you had not the underpants.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Couldn't care less?
I plant problem trees. The neighbour plants England flags from time to time. So what? I prefer to talk to him rather than make clucking noises.
One house in the in-law's street flies a different flag each week. I haven't checked out this week's offering but I thought the Confederate battle flag flying the other week was perhaps pushing it a bit.
I don't think it was any kind of political statement judging by the array of alternative flags he has but I'm not sure it could be recommended in all parts.
Also, on vaccine supply, AIUI the NHS is currently in possession of ~30m doses of Pfizer and Moderna booster shots, that will be more than enough to complete the whole programme as booster take up won't be 100% of people with two doses. Another 30m booster doses are still expected to be delivered as well so supply won't be an issue, it will be the logistics of getting the vaccine centres up and running and getting at least 5m people per week into them.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
There's also the point that if you completely cover your house in flags you can no longer see what any of the neighbours have on their houses
Also, on vaccine supply, AIUI the NHS is currently in possession of ~30m doses of Pfizer and Moderna booster shots, that will be more than enough to complete the whole programme as booster take up won't be 100% of people with two doses. Another 30m booster doses are still expected to be delivered as well so supply won't be an issue, it will be the logistics of getting the vaccine centres up and running and getting at least 5m people per week into them.
What was the best rate we managed during the first roll out? From memory it was more 2-3m right?
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
In fairness, it was quite the opposite – lots of shrill panic-mongering from the usual suspects.
As I recall you were quite cool with it. And @Leon who went all, back to his bunker in Penarth mode, calmed down on the SA GP's news.
Eh? Did you read Leon's posts last night? It's endless panicking from him.
As for the GP, I have no problem with her comments being reported. I don't read much into them – they shouldn't be overanalysed – but I don't see why the networks shouldn't carry them at all.
Boosters for everyone after 3 months now - look forward to the details, sounds like a bun fight for bookings if true.
Need to get our appointments booked in ASAP!
Can confirm the website still tells you to **** off if too young.
I imagine it will get updated overnight tonight.
Sounds like they're going back to opening it up by age cohort rather than making 25m ellgible at once. Makes the 3 month gap a bit notional frankly unless you're only getting your 2nd jab today.
If the rate of 3rd doses don't change at all, it would take 100 days to finish the job, for all 18+ in the UK
To do it by the end of the year would take 1.2 million per day.
Also, on vaccine supply, AIUI the NHS is currently in possession of ~30m doses of Pfizer and Moderna booster shots, that will be more than enough to complete the whole programme as booster take up won't be 100% of people with two doses. Another 30m booster doses are still expected to be delivered as well so supply won't be an issue, it will be the logistics of getting the vaccine centres up and running and getting at least 5m people per week into them.
What was the best rate we managed during the first roll out? From memory it was more 2-3m right?
~4.5m per week for a couple of weeks while we were doing lots of first doses of Pfizer and lots of second doses of AZ. At that time we were supply limited but we also had three months of building up jabbing capacity, much of which has been closed and the people sent back to their day jobs. I think current capacity is about 3m doses per week, of which 400k is first and second doses. We'd need a doubling of that to really make a dent before Xmas.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Couldn't care less?
I'd politely tell them to mind their own business.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
Quite the opposite. Almost everyone here has been saying the SA doctor has been misquoted. You see what you want to see though.
Dr Leon and one or two others were rather reassured last night at the reporting from South Africa. I was very much hoping they were right as I have very much had enough of this Coronavirus b******s!
Leon was reassured? He is doom-pornographer in chief, barely a minute goes by without another bout of hysterical hyperbole from him.
And Labour reply straight away on to why haven't we given away more vaccines....despite SA having to stop new deliveries because they were overflowing and the UK having already given away 50% of their whole order of AZN.
The problem is SA is due to mismanagement, fake news and anti-vaxxers.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
In fairness, it was quite the opposite – lots of shrill panic-mongering from the usual suspects.
As I recall you were quite cool with it. And @Leon who went all, back to his bunker in Penarth mode, calmed down on the SA GP's news.
Eh? Did you read Leon's posts last night? It's endless panicking from him.
As for the GP, I have no problem with her comments being reported. I don't read much into them – they shouldn't be overanalysed – but I don't see why the networks shouldn't carry them at all.
Yes he went from Neil in the Young Ones to blind panic and back again, then @Leon saw the GP's report and calm descended.
Dunno who this ringer is giving Labour’s response to Javid. But she is one of those that doesn’t understand that covid is here forever and still thinks it can be eliminated if only the intrusion into our lives was strong enough. This Labour Party wants to condemn us to masks and tracking until we die. Concerning. Deeply deeply concerning.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Couldn't care less?
I plant problem trees. The neighbour plants England flags from time to time. So what? I prefer to talk to him rather than make clucking noises.
One house in the in-law's street flies a different flag each week. I haven't checked out this week's offering but I thought the Confederate battle flag flying the other week was perhaps pushing it a bit.
I don't think it was any kind of political statement judging by the array of alternative flags he has but I'm not sure it could be recommended in all parts.
Exactly. People have all kinds of reasons for objecting to all kind of things. @Philip has said that he wouldn't care about if a neighbour complained about something. But I'm not sure that is true. As you say if a sensible talk resulted in understanding on both sides.
Why shouldn't the people who might object to a cross of St. George be perfectly justified in objecting to it.
The other thing I'm relieved about from today's announcement is that it's very clear that the government intends to continue relying solely on the vaccine and acquired immunity to take the full weight of COVID in this country. One of my friends last night said that they thought this was the case and that current thinking is that NPIs have had their day. I wouldn't be surprised if the mask stuff is rolled back in two or three weeks if we do get another 15m boosters done in that time and over 90% of 50+ people done.
Seriously. Thornberry. Yet another north London hand-wringer.
Could Starmer not find a midlander or northerner who shares the priorities of voters in the seats we need to win? We need to out-Priti Priti on home affairs, and show that we would succeed where she is failing.
A bad appointment.
This absolutely spot on. In one move alone votes lost where needed in Wales with no useful votes gained in London. Also silly for Labour to shadow home office with left winger, Nandy should do it being most right winger in cabinet.
I live in Wales and I couldn't tell you who or what Nick Thomas-Symonds looks or sounds like. And now I need never know.
To be honest I thought he was okay. It’s lazy on here to save he was completely rubbish. He dressed smart. He spoke sensibly and clearly. On the news a lot last week. Wasn’t horribly opportunist about the issues in the channel like Nandy was over the weekend. He looked like a safe pair of hands for government.
I pay way more attention to politics than about 90% of the population and if you had asked me this morning who the shadow Home Secretary was this morning I might have come up with Nick but no way I would have got the surname. Given that the Home Secretary is under the pump and, frankly, more than a tad obnoxious, that's not great.
I am sure that SKS wants people who can demand the attention of the media and sound punchy. He's right to the extent that is what opposition politicians need to do to be even noticed. Thornberry is not everyone's cup of tea but neither is Patel. She will certainly be heard.
I know what you are saying, but I think it’s wrong. Opposition shadows you get to hear about when they have made a mistake. It’s just not that easy, because what gets thrown at them whenever they attack in Parliament or in tv debate, what’s your policy then?
There is no real votes in attacking in opposition, only in laying out and explaining policy positions.
I still vividly remember a very young looking Tony Blair appearing on Newsnight on Black Wednesday. as City Minister. He showed a clear understanding of the problems, just the right amount of sympathy for Ministers in real difficulty and clear bullet point answers. The Cabinet Minister up with him looked a bumbling incompetent by comparison. I remember thinking I have just seen a political masterclass and this guy is going to be a real challenge. Thornberry is not close to that but she's still way better than the vast majority of the shadow cabinet.
I agree that being an attack dog is not enough but you need to show competence and a clear alternative, even if the details are (understandably) missing.
I really like your post there David. The first rule of politics is not attack, just explain your position on issues. So you are measuring their talent in how well they communicate this. And acknowledging something had gone wrong not because your opposite number is stupid, but because some things that come up are difficult, is a master stroke in sounding fair and thoughtful. Attack merely siren Calls you down the stupid road Nandy choose to go down at the weekend. It’s leads to a dead end where you have lost the voters because you don’t actually have any answers. Boris knows it well, he is currently head butting the wall of that dead end.
Labour need policies and good calm communicators, not finger jabbers like Cooper or bruisers like maaaaaatron. 🤣
Cooper's cool as a cucumber. Very clever too. Her debit (imo) is a slight aura of 'take the punch bowl away before anybody has even arrived'. But if (as I hope) people are starting to tire of 'politics needs to be a good giggle' this won't be a debit at all.
I am happy to learn. What did I actually say that was wrong in the first paragraph?
I think you said she was a shouty pointy politician.
And Labour reply straight away on to why haven't we given away more vaccines....despite SA having to stop new orders because they were overflowing and the UK having already given away 50% of their whole order of AZN.
Astonishing lack of tone and content by Rosena Allin Khan
Dunno who this ringer is giving Labour’s response to Javid. But she is one of those that doesn’t understand that covid is here forever and still thinks it can be eliminated if only the intrusion into our lives was strong enough. This Labour Party wants to condemn us to masks and tracking until we die. Concerning. Deeply deeply concerning.
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Couldn't care less?
I'd politely tell them to mind their own business.
Great neighbour.
What if your children were scared by something visible and prominent in your neighbour's house? Just realise they would tell you to mind your own business.
The other thing I'm relieved about from today's announcement is that it's very clear that the government intends to continue relying solely on the vaccine and acquired immunity to take the full weight of COVID in this country. One of my friends last night said that they thought this was the case and that current thinking is that NPIs have had their day. I wouldn't be surprised if the mask stuff is rolled back in two or three weeks if we do get another 15m boosters done in that time and over 90% of 50+ people done.
That was the clear indication from Javid's statement in the HoC.
Anybody doubting how serious the scientists think this could be, you only have to see how JCVI have gone from nah kids don't need to worry, adults, some will get a booster something in the future. Now it is jab everybody ASAP, even a 4th go around.
I've been assured by the PB Scientific Team Brains Trust, from evidence they gathered from a GP in South Africa that there is nothing to fear.
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
In fairness, it was quite the opposite – lots of shrill panic-mongering from the usual suspects.
As I recall you were quite cool with it. And @Leon who went all, back to his bunker in Penarth mode, calmed down on the SA GP's news.
Eh? Did you read Leon's posts last night? It's endless panicking from him.
As for the GP, I have no problem with her comments being reported. I don't read much into them – they shouldn't be overanalysed – but I don't see why the networks shouldn't carry them at all.
Yes he went from Neil in the Young Ones to blind panic and back again, then @Leon saw the GP's report and calm descended.
No, he was slagging off the GP's report... I think you are mixing him up with someone else?
In case anyone cares in the middle of our leaders panicing so we don't have to / not letting a good crisis go to waste (delete as appropriate).
RSA cases down to 2.2k today - from 2.8k yesterday and 3.2k on Saturday.
And you have studied weekend reporting effects to the extent you are satisfied those figures are in some way meaningful?
Well, week on week cases are down 88%, but I wouldn't try to claim that is a fair read. Regardless the trajectory is not terrifying, and the actual cases figures from the epicentre of this crisis seem to me to be at least as relevant as estimates of what might happen.
So if you already booked for the 6 month booster, can you reschedule?
I'd have thought so, there's provision for changing your appointment (but you'll have to wait until you're eligible, it will be prioritised by age still, so not everyone at once).
On developed country privilege, and the marginalisation of the global South in much of what passes as Covid public science: a view from the South. A thread. 1/20
Good news for fans of Thornberry's return, Dan Hodges agrees with you -
@DPJHodges 16m I actually think Emily Thornberry to Shadow Home Affairs is a good move. Whatever White Van baggage she might carry, she's a scrapper. And Labour need that in that brief.
The flags story was trivial bollocks. Who in their right mind would want to live next to that effing state of a house?
Still, it was a great gift on PB as I had hours of fun asking the usual pearl-clutching PB Tories whether they, or their wife, would be comfortable if their next-door neighbour decked the front of their house in England flags. Much twisting and pin-head dancing ensued.
I'd quite happily live next to that house.
Absolutely no qualms with my neighbours flying flags. On my street I've got multiple neighbours who routinely fly flags, including one permanently flying a Unite flag. I've got many more who fly them during England tournaments and I've done so myself. Doesn't bother me at all, live and let live.
Anyone bothered by that needs to get their head out of their arse. Do you whinge about neighbours putting Christmas or Halloween decorations out too? Miserable gits.
Bully for you. The guy who decked his house in England flags did so in November 2014 – nothing to do with a major football tournament. It looked a right state and most people would be unhappy to have to live next to it.
Why?
We've got a neighbour who moans about other people's houses. She's full of shit in my opinion and so is anyone (I doubt its "most people") who get upset about other people's homes.
However people want to decorate their own home is up to them. Variety is the spice of life.
Curtain twitching busybodies need to get a life.
Bully for you if you (and your wife!) have such accommodating attitudes. I can tell you that they aren't widely shared. Most people don't want their streets to look a right state. But, each to their own.
As I said, there's multiple people who regularly fly flags on my street and nobody kicks off a stink about it.
"Each to their own" is the polar opposite of being a curtain twitching busybody whinging about other people's homes.
You lost your big St George in mysterious circumstances as I recall.
Nothing mysterious - my wife isn't keen and happy wife, happy life.
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Suppose it was a neighbour who objected to a huge 20ft square Pirate Flag that you had decided to drape over your house and he came to ask if you would mind taking it down as it was upsetting his young children.
Couldn't care less?
I'd politely tell them to mind their own business.
Great neighbour.
Absolutely, being polite to a curtain twitcher is more than they deserve, but manners maketh man.
The other thing I'm relieved about from today's announcement is that it's very clear that the government intends to continue relying solely on the vaccine and acquired immunity to take the full weight of COVID in this country. One of my friends last night said that they thought this was the case and that current thinking is that NPIs have had their day. I wouldn't be surprised if the mask stuff is rolled back in two or three weeks if we do get another 15m boosters done in that time and over 90% of 50+ people done.
If we can get enough jabs into enough arms, and assuming that the the triple-jabbed are indeed well protected against Omicron (which is expected, but not yet known, to be the case), then yes.
Comments
This is cutting it fine.
She won’t hold a referendum as risk of boycott too high. Round and round we go
If it was a neighbour not being keen, I wouldn't care less.
Supply will hold up.
Delivery capacity ... let's see how that goes.
"All adults in the UK should be offered booster jabs from just three months after their second vaccinations as the government’s advisers speeded up the programme to limit the spread of the Omicron variant.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) announced that the waiting time was being cut for all adults, with priority for booking to be decided by the NHS."
https://twitter.com/PaulMainwood/status/1465336577387905029?s=20
His grandfather was its PM, and this was its flag
And Andrew Bridgen says I don't need to wear a mask.
https://twitter.com/AvaSantina/status/1465318041072324614
On the second: that would be quite a different situation, though, would it not? I'd be more interested in the spousal connection if the person handing out the jobs was the spouse. If Ed Balls was Labour leader, I wouldn't question the relevance of pointing out that someone he appointed was his wife - it raises the question of possible favouritism, even if that might be unfounded. Would I be bothered? Not necessarily, in either case, but it would be right to point out the link. But Ed Balls is not even an MP any more - it seems unlikely that he's used his influence (what influence?) to get Cooper a post, if indeed she gets one.
Anyway, I'll leave you alone now. I was generally interested in the perception of relevance, but I don't think we're getting anywhere with that. Happy beer hunting
Will be delighted if they manage it and it could make all the difference. Big test of whether government can get arse into gear. Reaching the decision today, rather than next week as suggested at the weekend press conference, is a good start.
Couldn't care less?
e.g. the Telegraph is running a story that
Omicron Covid variant Q&A: How the symptoms differ and what protection vaccines offer
which again uses the same quote again, to make it sound like people know for certain the symptoms are different.
I also hope they get cracking as I would very much like to get a booster shot before Xmas when my wife and I are staying with my parents for a few days now that our trip to Switzerland is officially off.
trite, inanesearing meta-analysis of the Covid coverage.https://unherd.com/2021/11/the-good-news-about-the-omicron-variant/
Instead I am reading again and again and again the nonsense from the single South African GP.
One house in the in-law's street flies a different flag each week. I haven't checked out this week's offering but I thought the Confederate battle flag flying the other week was perhaps pushing it a bit.
I don't think it was any kind of political statement judging by the array of alternative flags he has but I'm not sure it could be recommended in all parts.
As for the GP, I have no problem with her comments being reported. I don't read much into them – they shouldn't be overanalysed – but I don't see why the networks shouldn't carry them at all.
To do it by the end of the year would take 1.2 million per day.
RSA cases down to 2.2k today - from 2.8k yesterday and 3.2k on Saturday.
The problem is SA is due to mismanagement, fake news and anti-vaxxers.
Why shouldn't the people who might object to a cross of St. George be perfectly justified in objecting to it.
(It seems that there's some walk-in capacity in some areas, so you could just try I guess)
What if your children were scared by something visible and prominent in your neighbour's house? Just realise they would tell you to mind your own business.
Ah HoC - never mind.
On developed country privilege, and the marginalisation of the global South in much of what passes as Covid public science: a view from the South. A thread. 1/20
https://twitter.com/tomtom_m/status/1465303487114321929?s=20
Jon Ashworth would have responded in a more constructive way