Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

The Greens are favourite in tonight’s local election bet – politicalbetting.com

13

Comments

  • Options
    FairlieredFairliered Posts: 3,970
    kle4 said:

    Relative of mine just got notice for their booster, but the nearest place to receive it is 25 miles way. Things are much better, but there's room for improvement.

    At least they’ve been offered a booster.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    Tbh I was offered a booster ages ago and haven’t got round to booking it
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Rather amusing though that all the wokeists who voted to remove Trump only managed to do so with an unwoke, elderly white male who is very gaffe prone as with this
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,576
    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Nothing wrong with talking about Negro Spirituals.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021
    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    OT. What happened to the football hooligans we used to read about every week?

    Well they're alive and well and loitering outside Old Trafford......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GcWE0s5X8
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    edited November 2021
    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    That is true that whatever the reason he would be pilloried if he said it, but Biden is not liked by many 'progressives', so while they'll not paint him in the same terms of Trump, and fair enough, I am pretty confident there will be Democrats who do come out and call it unacceptable.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    I thought the dog in The Dambusters was NOT called Negro?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725

    kle4 said:

    Relative of mine just got notice for their booster, but the nearest place to receive it is 25 miles way. Things are much better, but there's room for improvement.

    At least they’ve been offered a booster.
    Yes, and that's worth being thankful for. It doesn't mean elements of the programme cannot be criticised or improvement sought. I am sure sites closer by will open up, but there can be issues if they start out quite far away.
  • Options
    CiceroCicero Posts: 2,212
    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Rather amusing though that all the wokeists who voted to remove Trump only managed to do so with an unwoke, elderly white male who is very gaffe prone as with this
    Trump is a criminal traitor who broke his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Biden can be attacked, but he is not a criminal traitor and has not broken his oath. I would be VERY wary of supporting Trump, just because you think he is a "Conservative". IF you do, then you know that we will judge you by your friends.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Rather amusing though that all the wokeists who voted to remove Trump only managed to do so with an unwoke, elderly white male who is very gaffe prone as with this
    I don't think those people were Biden's core support.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,955
    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    kle4 said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    That is true, but Biden is not liked by many 'progressives', so while they'll not paint him in the same terms of Trump, and fair enough, I am pretty confident there will be Democrats who do come out and call it unacceptable.
    None so far

    TBH I genuinely think he is just a confused old man with some antiquated terminology, and its very hard to forget words you grew up with. I don't remotely think he is a secret Klansman (tho he might have some ripe opinions lurking)

    However the attempt to deny he didn't say what we can all hear him saying is insane and insulting. Also counter-productive
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,892
    And another day...

    Tory MPs accuse Johnson of hypocrisy in crackdown on second jobs https://on.ft.com/3oo8z8T
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603
    Roger said:

    OT. What happened to the football hooligans we used to read about every week?

    Well they're alive and well and loitering outside Old Trafford......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GcWE0s5X8

    One of the former Top Men of the Aberdeen Soccer Casuals set up a gentlemen's outfitters.
  • Options
    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Nothing wrong with talking about Negro Spirituals.
    The Spanish language will have to be canceled, I mean cancelled :lol:
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Rather amusing though that all the wokeists who voted to remove Trump only managed to do so with an unwoke, elderly white male who is very gaffe prone as with this
    I don't think those people were Biden's core support.
    That is the point, Hillary was more culturally progressive than Biden but lost the rustbelt and the Electoral College. Biden was only able to beat Trump in most of the rustbelt and win the EC by being more culturally conservative than she was
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021
    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    BTW - did you see the Ignatious talk last night on "our place in space"?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    Cicero said:

    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Rather amusing though that all the wokeists who voted to remove Trump only managed to do so with an unwoke, elderly white male who is very gaffe prone as with this
    Trump is a criminal traitor who broke his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Biden can be attacked, but he is not a criminal traitor and has not broken his oath. I would be VERY wary of supporting Trump, just because you think he is a "Conservative". IF you do, then you know that we will judge you by your friends.
    I don't support Trump but I don't support ultra woke either, like the average US voter.

    Hence the GOP easily won the Virginia governorship and legislature with Trump no longer on the ballot when it became a de facto referendum on wokeism
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    Floater said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    BTW - did you see the Ignatious talk last night on "our place in space"?
    https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/ufos-buzzing-us-warships-may-be-aliens-top-spy-chief/

    Drip drip drip
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021
    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775
    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    It's just odd anyway.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,955
    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    Well fair enough then. I must withdraw my objection.
    The Negro League, however, remains the Negro League. It has no other name AFAIAA. And is frequently talked about as such.
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,850
    Plenty of polling excitement on here following Redfield-Wilton but Bulgaria votes this coming weekend and we have two polls out today:

    First, Mediana - changes from July election:

    GERB/SDS: 25.4% (+1.9)
    We Continue the Change (PP): 17.3% (+17.3)
    Socialists (BSP): 15.6% (+2.2)
    There is Such a Nation (ITN): 12.2% (-11.9)
    Movement of Rights and Freedoms (DPS): 10.6% (-0.1)
    Democratic Bulgaria (DB): 9.7% (-2.9)
    Stand Up Bulgaria! (IBG.NI): 4.2% (-0.8)
    Revival (V): 3.1% (+0.1)
    National Movement (VMRO): 2.2% (-0.9)

    Then, Trend - ditto

    GERB/SDS: 22.9% (-0.6)
    Socialists (BSP): 15.1% (+1.7)
    We Continue the Change (PP): 14.8% (+14.8)
    There is Such a Nation (ITN): 12.8% (-11.3)
    Movement of Rights and Freedoms (DPS): 10.3% (-0.4)
    Democratic Bulgaria (DB): 9.1% (-3.5)
    Revival (V): 3.6% (+0.6)
    Stand Up Bulgaria! (IBG.NI): 3.3% (-1.7)
    National Movement (VMRO): 2.2% (-0.9)

    Electoral threshold is 4% so IBG-NI are on the brink but the leading six parties should all get in with the biggest change the index of PP at the expense of ITN. The latest Presidential poll shows Radev eighteen points ahead of the GERB supported Gerdzhikov (46-28). That won't be enough for an outright win on the first ballot but should be an easy second round win. The question is whether PP, the Socialists, DPS and DB can sink their differences and out together a coalition to exclude both GERB-SDS and ITN.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,055

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Nothing wrong with talking about Negro Spirituals.
    The Spanish language will have to be canceled, I mean cancelled :lol:
    It’s also guilty of gender crimes for refusing to replace -o and -a endings with -x.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Of course Trump's best chance in 2024 is for Biden to not get the Democratic nomination and for an ultra woke liberal to get it instead.

    Biden is very gaffe prone but he is still a more electable Democrat than the left liberal urban AOC wing of their party
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,892
    -Johnson took the moral high ground with Tory MPs yesterday, saying:

    “you must put your job as an MP 1st and you must devote yourself primarily and above all to your constituents”

    -we calculate the PM himself has made over £4.3m from outside interests

    https://www.ft.com/content/a256fc82-e036-469a-b489-be5b3f806deb

    - Johnson also juggled job of being MP with editing Spectator mag from 2001 to 2005

    - the @ft calculation of £4.3m doesn’t even include his first stint in Westminster from 2001-2008 because the register didn’t demand disclosure of precise payments then
  • Options

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I love this lefty response to Biden using the OTHER N word

    "Typically it’s not acceptable but here he was clearly talking about the Negro Leagues which is what the African American segregated baseball league was called at the time. The outrage here in this thread is entirely misplaced."

    https://twitter.com/rawcrawjaw/status/1458848614655016965?s=20

    I mean, fuck off. Anyone using this term on TV will get cancelled. Except, it seems, a Democrat American President

    Imagine if Trump said it

    Nothing wrong with talking about Negro Spirituals.
    The Spanish language will have to be canceled, I mean cancelled :lol:
    It’s also guilty of gender crimes for refusing to replace -o and -a endings with -x.
    When I was last there, Da Yoot (or whatever the hispanic equivalent is) were using @ as a way of neutralising genders. Which is at least ingenious.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Of course Trump's best chance in 2024 is for Biden to not get the Democratic nomination and for an ultra woke liberal to get it instead.

    Biden is very gaffe prone but he is still a more electable Democrat than the left liberal urban AOC wing of their party
    At the moment I think we are cruising, comfortably, to the horror of a Trump victory.

    With a sensible non-demented Democrat centrist candidate, it would be impossible. The Dems win against Trump. Clearly if the Republican party gets a grip, it won't be allowed, Trump won't even be the nominee

    Yet it looks like it will be Trump versus either an ulra-Woke Dem or Senile Joe Biden, and Trump could easily win either
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    He says Negro League. He does. He just DOES.

    Its literally in the sentence you quoted FFS.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    OMG PB just stop
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    Leon said:

    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Of course Trump's best chance in 2024 is for Biden to not get the Democratic nomination and for an ultra woke liberal to get it instead.

    Biden is very gaffe prone but he is still a more electable Democrat than the left liberal urban AOC wing of their party
    At the moment I think we are cruising, comfortably, to the horror of a Trump victory.

    With a sensible non-demented Democrat centrist candidate, it would be impossible. The Dems win against Trump. Clearly if the Republican party gets a grip, it won't be allowed, Trump won't even be the nominee

    Yet it looks like it will be Trump versus either an ulra-Woke Dem or Senile Joe Biden, and Trump could easily win either
    Trump could beat the former yes, in the privacy of the polling booth suburban voters might thing Trump the lesser of 2 evils. I think Biden would still beat Trump though, he is gaffe prone but he was gaffe prone in 2020. Voters did not expect him to be great, just better than Trump and he is not really woke
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,955
    Btw. Satchell Paige was one of the genuine all time baseball greats. Played from 1927 through to the Sixties. First African American to pitch in a World Series.
    Ought to be as famous as Babe Ruth or Joe diMaggio.
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    FPT

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Has nobody spotted that yesterday had the highest number of first doses of Vaccine since July.

    (And highest number of second doses since Sept).

    I did. But I was told it is "data catch up" by Max, who normally knows his Covid onions
    It's still good because what we thought were poor numbers was just an underreporting error. The booster shots look positively smashing at the moment. Should hit 3m per week next week.
    I read that the Netherlands (I think) has only just started boostering over 80s. Madness
    Europe hasn't really learned from out failures at all. I read that they aren't planning to start over 60s boosters until Jan 2020, it's not as though they don't have the supply either. Europe is sitting on something like 200m Pfizer doses for it's booster programme.
    Hmm.. you're making the classic mistake of thinking that 'Europe' acts as though it were a single country. Ireland, France, Denmark, and Spain are far ahead of the UK in jab take-up despite the botched start, and France in particular is going great guns on the boosters. On the other hand, Germany, Switzerland and Austria are still miles behind the UK, and it's beginning to show in their deaths and hospitalisation figures. Further east it's disastrous.

    The Netherlands is about the same as us in total take up, and you can see the protection in the figures. Like us, though, they've got too many cases for comfort:

    https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1458748635609550848
    France is not "going great guns on the boosters". They're only able to bring in the vaccine pass requirement for over 65s from December 15th - more than a month away. They are seriously behind the UK.

    image
    They most certainly are not miles behind the UK. We have 13.6% of over-12s completely unvaxxed (i.e. not even the first dose), they are on 8.4%.

    Of course, they started later, so applying the same 6-month period that we apply, it's appropriate that the number of triple-jabbed is currently lower than ours. The point is, though, that they are getting on with it, and they are going to enforce it seriously. I fully expect them to get a higher triple-jab rate than us quite quickly.
    They've done better in absolute total jabs because they have introduced rigorous, universal vaxports. I regret that the UK did not do the same, but it was an economic and libertarian choice, that we consciously made - supported by many on here

    The only way you can drive up vax rates to 85%+ is with mandatory vaxports everywhere

    The truly alarming figures in that FT twitter thread is the German-speaking non vaxed proportion of over 12s.

    22-25%!! That's a huge reservoir of potential victims. That's nearly 20 million people in Germany
    Germany really could be the latest victim of the golden rule of covid hubris. The share of positive tests they have at the moment suggests the true level of current cases is quite dramatic.
    I posted the test positivity numbers yesterday, and Germany didn't stand out. It was nowhere near Ireland (14%) or some of South America or Eastern Europe (40+%)
    Where are you getting your positivity numbers from?

    image
    That UK number is wrong. I got mine from the Europa Covid page - https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/data-national-14-day-notification-rate-covid-19

    Which I see is 14 days out of date.
    Yes UK number from Our World In Data is wrong:
    https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/testing?areaType=nation&areaName=England
    shows the positivity rate for England as 9.2% (a week ago)

    For some reason, Our World In Data (and some posters on here) persistently like to wrongly add in LFTs done in the UK when comparing PCR tests.

    German number for calendar week 44 is 16% - again this is the positivity rate for PCR tests, which are only a small fraction of tests done, so it is a little difficult to draw solid conclusions about the "true level" of cases without knowing something about the LFT testing regime.
    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/COVID-19-Trends/COVID-19-Trends.html?__blob=publicationFile#/home

    Germany hasn't handled coronavirus well but I'd like to know what people mean when they talk about German "covid hubris"?
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
    He says Negro League. Literally in the sentence.

    Its what the league was called.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
    If Biden had put that word for word in a tweet, then you'd have a better point.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    We don't need to surmise what he said, you quoted it. He meant Negro League, he said it.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    I'm not sure what this argument is even about. Leon's right he did say 'the great negro' and said he doesn't think Biden is a secret clansman, and the others are right Biden clearly misspoke (the sentence structure doesn't work otherwise) and it was in a context which explains that. It's not an argument about whether he is a racist, but whether he stumbled over his words in a way which, for many, would be condemned without pity because it involved race.

    It's a gaffe, and will be good fodder for those who dislike him on left and right, but nothing more than that.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263
    edited November 2021
    kamski said:

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    FPT

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Has nobody spotted that yesterday had the highest number of first doses of Vaccine since July.

    (And highest number of second doses since Sept).

    I did. But I was told it is "data catch up" by Max, who normally knows his Covid onions
    It's still good because what we thought were poor numbers was just an underreporting error. The booster shots look positively smashing at the moment. Should hit 3m per week next week.
    I read that the Netherlands (I think) has only just started boostering over 80s. Madness
    Europe hasn't really learned from out failures at all. I read that they aren't planning to start over 60s boosters until Jan 2020, it's not as though they don't have the supply either. Europe is sitting on something like 200m Pfizer doses for it's booster programme.
    Hmm.. you're making the classic mistake of thinking that 'Europe' acts as though it were a single country. Ireland, France, Denmark, and Spain are far ahead of the UK in jab take-up despite the botched start, and France in particular is going great guns on the boosters. On the other hand, Germany, Switzerland and Austria are still miles behind the UK, and it's beginning to show in their deaths and hospitalisation figures. Further east it's disastrous.

    The Netherlands is about the same as us in total take up, and you can see the protection in the figures. Like us, though, they've got too many cases for comfort:

    https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1458748635609550848
    France is not "going great guns on the boosters". They're only able to bring in the vaccine pass requirement for over 65s from December 15th - more than a month away. They are seriously behind the UK.

    image
    They most certainly are not miles behind the UK. We have 13.6% of over-12s completely unvaxxed (i.e. not even the first dose), they are on 8.4%.

    Of course, they started later, so applying the same 6-month period that we apply, it's appropriate that the number of triple-jabbed is currently lower than ours. The point is, though, that they are getting on with it, and they are going to enforce it seriously. I fully expect them to get a higher triple-jab rate than us quite quickly.
    They've done better in absolute total jabs because they have introduced rigorous, universal vaxports. I regret that the UK did not do the same, but it was an economic and libertarian choice, that we consciously made - supported by many on here

    The only way you can drive up vax rates to 85%+ is with mandatory vaxports everywhere

    The truly alarming figures in that FT twitter thread is the German-speaking non vaxed proportion of over 12s.

    22-25%!! That's a huge reservoir of potential victims. That's nearly 20 million people in Germany
    Germany really could be the latest victim of the golden rule of covid hubris. The share of positive tests they have at the moment suggests the true level of current cases is quite dramatic.
    I posted the test positivity numbers yesterday, and Germany didn't stand out. It was nowhere near Ireland (14%) or some of South America or Eastern Europe (40+%)
    Where are you getting your positivity numbers from?

    image
    That UK number is wrong. I got mine from the Europa Covid page - https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/data-national-14-day-notification-rate-covid-19

    Which I see is 14 days out of date.
    Yes UK number from Our World In Data is wrong:
    https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/testing?areaType=nation&areaName=England
    shows the positivity rate for England as 9.2% (a week ago)

    For some reason, Our World In Data (and some posters on here) persistently like to wrongly add in LFTs done in the UK when comparing PCR tests.

    German number for calendar week 44 is 16% - again this is the positivity rate for PCR tests, which are only a small fraction of tests done, so it is a little difficult to draw solid conclusions about the "true level" of cases without knowing something about the LFT testing regime.
    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/COVID-19-Trends/COVID-19-Trends.html?__blob=publicationFile#/home

    Germany hasn't handled coronavirus well but I'd like to know what people mean when they talk about German "covid hubris"?
    Indeed. I was in Germany both 2020 and for longer this year, and I haven’t been anywhere else that was taking the precautions so seriously (admittedly I didn’t travel into the former GDR). If Germany has an autumn crisis, the lesson I draw is that the latest variants are sufficiently contagious that we might as well give up on mask wearing altogether, since it clearly makes negligible difference.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
    FFS

    I've just realised that YOU capitalised the N in your first 'negro'.

    If Biden was calling him 'the great negro' you wouldn't capitalise the N. It's not a proper fucking noun.

    The Negro League IS though. Which is why it's capitalised.

    YOU KNOW he was talking about the Negro League, which is why YOU capitalised the N in a non-proper noun 'negro'.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    We don't need to surmise what he said, you quoted it. He meant Negro League, he said it.
    Actually, my honest surmisal - as someone who certainly doesn't hate Biden but thinks he is a fairly inept old man, and as someone who would have voted for him over the awful Trump - is that he meant to say "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues."

    That's the most logical explanation of his stumbling syntax. But halfway through, in his foggy brain, he realised he was saying something politically incorrect, so he tried to rework it, but too late. You can see this on his face, I reckon. But I am just projecting - as are you. All we have are those bald three words that he SAID. "The great negro".

    Biden is not a racist, probably. But he is a white male American of a certain age who grew up when racist opinions were widespread and the word "Negro" was actually considered POLITE compared to other words. It is understandable it might slip out.

    He is of his own, long-gone era. And that is increasingly evident, as time goes by
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,150
    Here's a new vector for the spread.
    "Covid: First UK case in pet dog confirmed by top vet"
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59246304
    Calls for doggy vaccines incoming.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    Completely off topic (but in fairness I've already commented on the by-election), in watching foreign language stuff on Netflix one thing I find mildly interesting is what English words or expressions apparently don't exist in the native language, or for whatever reason they use the English instead. IIRC Borgen taught us that '15 minutes of fame' is not a native Danish idiom, and I was watching some polish language thing where 'project management' was in English.
  • Options

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
    FFS

    I've just realised that YOU capitalised the N in your first 'negro'.

    If Biden was calling him 'the great negro' you wouldn't capitalise the N. It's not a proper fucking noun.

    The Negro League IS though. Which is why it's capitalised.

    YOU KNOW he was talking about the Negro League, which is why YOU capitalised the N in a non-proper noun 'negro'.
    I should have checked first. Negro IS a proper noun. Oops. Sorry @Leon !
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    PB people, if you ever want to understand the term "gaslighting" then this is the clearest example I have ever seen

    The president called a guy "the great Negro"

    But apparently he didn't, because


    "The president obviously began to say “Great Negro League pitcher,” but then paused and shifted to saying “at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues,” which was, in fact, the name of the league that Black players formed when they were shut out of Major League Baseball. That this needs to be explained is beyond absurd."

    To prove this assertion, they link to the video where Biden says "the great negro", they are thus trying to deny what is obviously true, and in front of your face, and in the most overt way, such that you might get confused, and doubt your own senses. THAT is gaslighting


    https://www.mediaite.com/online/no-joe-biden-did-not-refer-to-satchel-paige-as-a-negro-during-veterans-day-speech/

    I think they're right and you're wrong on this.

    I wanted to believe, for the laughs, that Joe's long hidden inner-racist was now sleepy talking, but I'm pretty sure he'd just realised halfway through that he needed to explain his use of 'negro' and did it in an exceedingly clumsy way.
    Yes, but he says "the great negro". He does. He just DOES.

    FFS

    All else is supposition
    Yes. He says "The great negro at the time pitcher in the Negro League"

    Which only makes any sense if it's with the explanation offered.

    Do you really think he meant anything else?
    I'm glad you quoted it in full

    He says

    "the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in he Negro League"

    THE GREAT NEGRO

    There. We all agree. He said. Them three words in that order. Right there

    So next time some poor idiot on Twitter is being cancelled for using "the wrong words" we can all refer to the President of the USA and say Oh they didn't say that, because they meant something else
    FFS

    I've just realised that YOU capitalised the N in your first 'negro'.

    If Biden was calling him 'the great negro' you wouldn't capitalise the N. It's not a proper fucking noun.

    The Negro League IS though. Which is why it's capitalised.

    YOU KNOW he was talking about the Negro League, which is why YOU capitalised the N in a non-proper noun 'negro'.
    lol
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    I'm not sure what this argument is even about. Leon's right he did say 'the great negro' and said he doesn't think Biden is a secret clansman, and the others are right Biden clearly misspoke (the sentence structure doesn't work otherwise) and it was in a context which explains that. It's not an argument about whether he is a racist, but whether he stumbled over his words in a way which, for many, would be condemned without pity because it involved race.

    It's a gaffe, and will be good fodder for those who dislike him on left and right, but nothing more than that.

    I think in the world of the anti-woke there is a perception that the woke are trying to trap and pounce on any utterances that are out of line, so this looks like blatant hypocrisy that should be challenged. For the rest of us, intent matters, and it is far far more likely that he misspoke, so it becomes a non issue.

    We live in different worlds nowadays.

  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,796
    edited November 2021
    Leon said:

    OMG PB just stop


    The tragic spectacle of denial, sleepwalking towards the gulag.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021

    kle4 said:

    I'm not sure what this argument is even about. Leon's right he did say 'the great negro' and said he doesn't think Biden is a secret clansman, and the others are right Biden clearly misspoke (the sentence structure doesn't work otherwise) and it was in a context which explains that. It's not an argument about whether he is a racist, but whether he stumbled over his words in a way which, for many, would be condemned without pity because it involved race.

    It's a gaffe, and will be good fodder for those who dislike him on left and right, but nothing more than that.

    I think in the world of the anti-woke there is a perception that the woke are trying to trap and pounce on any utterances that are out of line, so this looks like blatant hypocrisy that should be challenged. For the rest of us, intent matters, and it is far far more likely that he misspoke, so it becomes a non issue.

    We live in different worlds nowadays.

    And there, my friends, is Thoughtcrime

    It doesn't matter what you actually say, it's what We know you REALLY MEANT when you said it. So we always decide, on the Left, because we are correct and superior

    You really are a bunch of sinister fucks
  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,796
    The woke stuff and the associated gaslighting is fundamentally a reaction to Brexit and Trump; it is very hard to see how the right can respond except by way of a greater form of madness.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    geoffw said:

    Here's a new vector for the spread.
    "Covid: First UK case in pet dog confirmed by top vet"
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59246304
    Calls for doggy vaccines incoming.

    That dogs can carry (and more importantly spread) Covid has been suspected for some time. Indeed, Covid has been shown to infect over 100 mammalian species, so wiping it out from humans is highly unlikely to wipe it out from the planet, because we'll be able to get it from gerbils, dogs, etc.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    Humour:


  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    Tbh I'm enjoying his presidency whilst it lasts, Biden is likely the last non woke Democrat president.

    From here on out it's the screeching woke left vs Trumpism.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775
    Omnium said:

    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Labour 295,278,267 votes? Blimey, that's a lot!

    If Starmer does not match it then he should GTFO, loser.
    Some interesting polls on this recently:

    How polls have changed since Starmer became leader:

    Redfield and Winton 🌹LAB+7, 🌳CON-12
    YouGov 🌹Lab+8, 🌳Con-16
    Opinium 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-16
    Ipsos MORI 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-17

    https://twitter.com/AdamRd1989/status/1457780064318222337?t=ahRAljpqCHBAtGgPUQIorQ&s=19

    All bar one do put Starmer 20 points ahead of the point before he became leader, and that was 19 points. I am not particularly a fan, but quite some swing.
    I've recently backed Starmer to be next PM in a modest way. 5ish BF. If anything though he's been drifting.I don't really get why as surely Boris is in more trouble than he's ever been. Is there some view that Labour would use the opportunity of any Tory leadership change to switch too?

    I'd really like to find a bet that focussed on the LD/Green race - perhaps "3rd party seatwise"? Would you 1000 on either the Tories or Labour? (Normally probably yes, but currently - not so sure)


    The trouble with the next Prime Minister market is you need to factor in that Boris might be replaced before the next election, in which case the next Prime Minister will be a Conservative and not Keir Starmer. We've seen this when going from Cameron to May and from May to Boris. The worse the polls get for the blue team, the more likely it is that Boris will walk, and the more likely it is that backbenchers will send in their letters.
    That's the bit I love.

    Starmer drifting must point to it being far worse for Boris than I envisioned.

    I was a bit wrong-footed by Maggie's departure. I suspect I'll not spot the signs again.
    Presumably Sunak's odds are tightening?
    No - basically unchanged.

    PS. Farooq, I need to offer you an apology. Some weeks ago I concluded that you were some sort of a Chinese infiltrator or other. I'm pretty sure I was wrong though. I'm not sure you're quite what you seem, but hey, who is!
    Is that what you thought? Ha, interesting to know.
    I assure you I'm sincere in my beliefs, and if anyone cares to have a summary of them (I feel my audience at this point wouldn't fill a phone box), it's that we do best as a country when we don't go lurching suddenly off on some mad scheme, when we look after each other, when we preserve our freedoms and stick up for those in the world who want to preserve and win their own. But not at any old price: sometimes we're best to leave well alone. Capitalism is best but turns sour with large wealth inequalities, and we need the odd dose of social democracy to keep us honest. I have fairly wide parameters to what I think acceptable governance looks like, and I think probably 500+ of our MPs are good people. Boris Johnson isn't one of them, and probably has never been a good person in all his wretched life. He's a selfish, dangerous bastard, but even he gets some things right.

    I don't have a lot of interest in China. I know their sabre rattling of Taiwan is wrong and their human rights is abysmal, but I also think their leadership has a streak of civilisation through it and they have a path to a better place without us throwing too much vinegar around. I'm much more worried by Russia's leadership, but all this comes from a fairly selfish point of view. I don't think China is really out to deliberately make my life worse, I'm just glad I don't live there. Putin, on the other hand, wants all of us to suffer. We need to watch China, but on Putin, we need to act.

    If you know of anyone who is willing to pay for me to spout off on any of the above, I'll gladly take the cash. As long as I'm paid to give my own opinion and not someone else's, I'll happily be an infiltrator.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,594
    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    Pulpstar said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    Tbh I'm enjoying his presidency whilst it lasts, Biden is likely the last non woke Democrat president.

    From here on out it's the screeching woke left vs Trumpism.
    Unless they are actually represented by Trump, the Republicans will win that contest, for the foreseeable future. As long as the large majority of Americans are "white" they will not accept an ideology that says Whiteness is inherently evil. Unsurprisingly
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,594
    darkage said:

    The woke stuff and the associated gaslighting is fundamentally a reaction to Brexit and Trump; it is very hard to see how the right can respond except by way of a greater form of madness.

    Well we see plenty of that from the Wokefinder Inquisition!
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    I'm embarrassed to say it took me to the third paragraph to realise it was not a real article.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    Leon said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    Tbh I'm enjoying his presidency whilst it lasts, Biden is likely the last non woke Democrat president.

    From here on out it's the screeching woke left vs Trumpism.
    Unless they are actually represented by Trump, the Republicans will win that contest, for the foreseeable future. As long as the large majority of Americans are "white" they will not accept an ideology that says Whiteness is inherently evil. Unsurprisingly
    Plenty of Blacks and Hispanics are social conservatives and traditional in values too and do not hate their own country.

    A white student or social sciences professor or trial lawyer is more likely to be ultra woke than a married, socially conservative Black or Hispanic
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    I'd have the same opinion of Trump having said the exact same thing as I do of Biden having said it.

    But the woke would be wailing if it were Trump.
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    And yet which one of you and Foxy do you think comes across as the total arsehole on here?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,594
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    So when you say "you guys" cancel, who do you mean?. I haven't called for or supported anyone being cancelled. Neither does it spring to mind any one else amongst regular posters there.

    You just seem to spout wild accusations from your fertile imagination inspired by the loonies corners of Twitter. It ain't the real world.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    And yet which one of you and Foxy do you think comes across as the total arsehole on here?
    You?
  • Options
    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Labour 295,278,267 votes? Blimey, that's a lot!

    If Starmer does not match it then he should GTFO, loser.
    Some interesting polls on this recently:

    How polls have changed since Starmer became leader:

    Redfield and Winton 🌹LAB+7, 🌳CON-12
    YouGov 🌹Lab+8, 🌳Con-16
    Opinium 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-16
    Ipsos MORI 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-17

    https://twitter.com/AdamRd1989/status/1457780064318222337?t=ahRAljpqCHBAtGgPUQIorQ&s=19

    All bar one do put Starmer 20 points ahead of the point before he became leader, and that was 19 points. I am not particularly a fan, but quite some swing.
    I've recently backed Starmer to be next PM in a modest way. 5ish BF. If anything though he's been drifting.I don't really get why as surely Boris is in more trouble than he's ever been. Is there some view that Labour would use the opportunity of any Tory leadership change to switch too?

    I'd really like to find a bet that focussed on the LD/Green race - perhaps "3rd party seatwise"? Would you 1000 on either the Tories or Labour? (Normally probably yes, but currently - not so sure)


    The trouble with the next Prime Minister market is you need to factor in that Boris might be replaced before the next election, in which case the next Prime Minister will be a Conservative and not Keir Starmer. We've seen this when going from Cameron to May and from May to Boris. The worse the polls get for the blue team, the more likely it is that Boris will walk, and the more likely it is that backbenchers will send in their letters.
    That's the bit I love.

    Starmer drifting must point to it being far worse for Boris than I envisioned.

    I was a bit wrong-footed by Maggie's departure. I suspect I'll not spot the signs again.
    Presumably Sunak's odds are tightening?
    No - basically unchanged.

    PS. Farooq, I need to offer you an apology. Some weeks ago I concluded that you were some sort of a Chinese infiltrator or other. I'm pretty sure I was wrong though. I'm not sure you're quite what you seem, but hey, who is!
    Is that what you thought? Ha, interesting to know.
    I assure you I'm sincere in my beliefs, and if anyone cares to have a summary of them (I feel my audience at this point wouldn't fill a phone box), it's that we do best as a country when we don't go lurching suddenly off on some mad scheme, when we look after each other, when we preserve our freedoms and stick up for those in the world who want to preserve and win their own. But not at any old price: sometimes we're best to leave well alone. Capitalism is best but turns sour with large wealth inequalities, and we need the odd dose of social democracy to keep us honest. I have fairly wide parameters to what I think acceptable governance looks like, and I think probably 500+ of our MPs are good people. Boris Johnson isn't one of them, and probably has never been a good person in all his wretched life. He's a selfish, dangerous bastard, but even he gets some things right.

    I don't have a lot of interest in China. I know their sabre rattling of Taiwan is wrong and their human rights is abysmal, but I also think their leadership has a streak of civilisation through it and they have a path to a better place without us throwing too much vinegar around. I'm much more worried by Russia's leadership, but all this comes from a fairly selfish point of view. I don't think China is really out to deliberately make my life worse, I'm just glad I don't live there. Putin, on the other hand, wants all of us to suffer. We need to watch China, but on Putin, we need to act.

    If you know of anyone who is willing to pay for me to spout off on any of the above, I'll gladly take the cash. As long as I'm paid to give my own opinion and not someone else's, I'll happily be an infiltrator.
    Very interesting and I agree largely with you but I do not downplay China

    It may be a result of our travels to Asia, Australia and New Zealand in the years our eldest son lived in Christchurch 2003 - 2015 and it does provide a different view of the world and that Europe, while important, is not the whole story

    On Putin I am genuinely interested in what steps we should take or as you say act
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    No I claimed correctly that the figure for 9th of November was 39000. You falsely claimed that the figure for I don't know which day was 45k, which it wasn't (because no day has had that number). Moron.
  • Options
    What fresh...



    Neil Henderson
    @hendopolis
    ·
    7m
    TELEGRAPH: Russia may invade Ukraine, warns US #TomorrowsPapersToday
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    So when you say "you guys" cancel, who do you mean?. I haven't called for or supported anyone being cancelled. Neither does it spring to mind any one else amongst regular posters there.

    You just seem to spout wild accusations from your fertile imagination inspired by the loonies corners of Twitter. It ain't the real world.
    TBF you are at the nicer, Christian end of the Wokeness spectrum, however prissy and purse lipped. But you're still on the spectrum. There is a Canceller lurking in your soul. I see it
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    And yet which one of you and Foxy do you think comes across as the total arsehole on here?
    You?
    I'm not claiming to be "nicer" than anyone though am I you arsehole.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,986
    edited November 2021
    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Labour 295,278,267 votes? Blimey, that's a lot!

    If Starmer does not match it then he should GTFO, loser.
    Some interesting polls on this recently:

    How polls have changed since Starmer became leader:

    Redfield and Winton 🌹LAB+7, 🌳CON-12
    YouGov 🌹Lab+8, 🌳Con-16
    Opinium 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-16
    Ipsos MORI 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-17

    https://twitter.com/AdamRd1989/status/1457780064318222337?t=ahRAljpqCHBAtGgPUQIorQ&s=19

    All bar one do put Starmer 20 points ahead of the point before he became leader, and that was 19 points. I am not particularly a fan, but quite some swing.
    I've recently backed Starmer to be next PM in a modest way. 5ish BF. If anything though he's been drifting.I don't really get why as surely Boris is in more trouble than he's ever been. Is there some view that Labour would use the opportunity of any Tory leadership change to switch too?

    I'd really like to find a bet that focussed on the LD/Green race - perhaps "3rd party seatwise"? Would you 1000 on either the Tories or Labour? (Normally probably yes, but currently - not so sure)


    The trouble with the next Prime Minister market is you need to factor in that Boris might be replaced before the next election, in which case the next Prime Minister will be a Conservative and not Keir Starmer. We've seen this when going from Cameron to May and from May to Boris. The worse the polls get for the blue team, the more likely it is that Boris will walk, and the more likely it is that backbenchers will send in their letters.
    That's the bit I love.

    Starmer drifting must point to it being far worse for Boris than I envisioned.

    I was a bit wrong-footed by Maggie's departure. I suspect I'll not spot the signs again.
    Presumably Sunak's odds are tightening?
    No - basically unchanged.

    PS. Farooq, I need to offer you an apology. Some weeks ago I concluded that you were some sort of a Chinese infiltrator or other. I'm pretty sure I was wrong though. I'm not sure you're quite what you seem, but hey, who is!
    Is that what you thought? Ha, interesting to know.
    I assure you I'm sincere in my beliefs, and if anyone cares to have a summary of them (I feel my audience at this point wouldn't fill a phone box), it's that we do best as a country when we don't go lurching suddenly off on some mad scheme, when we look after each other, when we preserve our freedoms and stick up for those in the world who want to preserve and win their own. But not at any old price: sometimes we're best to leave well alone. Capitalism is best but turns sour with large wealth inequalities, and we need the odd dose of social democracy to keep us honest. I have fairly wide parameters to what I think acceptable governance looks like, and I think probably 500+ of our MPs are good people. Boris Johnson isn't one of them, and probably has never been a good person in all his wretched life. He's a selfish, dangerous bastard, but even he gets some things right.

    I don't have a lot of interest in China. I know their sabre rattling of Taiwan is wrong and their human rights is abysmal, but I also think their leadership has a streak of civilisation through it and they have a path to a better place without us throwing too much vinegar around. I'm much more worried by Russia's leadership, but all this comes from a fairly selfish point of view. I don't think China is really out to deliberately make my life worse, I'm just glad I don't live there. Putin, on the other hand, wants all of us to suffer. We need to watch China, but on Putin, we need to act.

    If you know of anyone who is willing to pay for me to spout off on any of the above, I'll gladly take the cash. As long as I'm paid to give my own opinion and not someone else's, I'll happily be an infiltrator.
    I thought Putin was the new hero of the non woke ultra right?

    If the 20th century was defined by the global battle between socialism and capitalism, perhaps the 21st century will be defined by the battle between wokeist radical progressives and traditionalist conservatives and nationalists?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,955
    HYUFD said:

    Leon said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    Tbh I'm enjoying his presidency whilst it lasts, Biden is likely the last non woke Democrat president.

    From here on out it's the screeching woke left vs Trumpism.
    Unless they are actually represented by Trump, the Republicans will win that contest, for the foreseeable future. As long as the large majority of Americans are "white" they will not accept an ideology that says Whiteness is inherently evil. Unsurprisingly
    Plenty of Blacks and Hispanics are social conservatives and traditional in values too and do not hate their own country.

    A white student or social sciences professor or trial lawyer is more likely to be ultra woke than a married, socially conservative Black or Hispanic
    I take your point. But what does married have to do with it?
    Plenty of social Conservatives are on their third or more marriage.
  • Options
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    kle4 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Some terms are only ok in very specific configurations according to the nebulous rules of society. Colored People being a famous example. In this case even though the league can hardly be otherwise referred to, saying 'the great negro' counts as a gaffe as it sounds awkward as hell, even though the context for such a reference seems pretty clear.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if the Woke weren't so intensely keen on getting people cancelled and ruined for just one verbal gaffe. Here is the American President making an enormous racist gaffe, live on TV, and suddenly it doesn't really matter, or, even worse, it doesn't matter because "he didn't actually say it, even tho we can all see and hear that he actually did say it."

    Gaslights, gaslights, everywhere
    Hang on, aren't you trying to cancel him, while the Woke aren't that bothered?
    No, I'm not. See my comments passim. I would NOT cancel him. He's just a confused old man

    That is the difference between us. You guys cancel. We account for the human condition, the crooked timber of humanity, because we are intrinsically nicer than you
    And yet which one of you and Foxy do you think comes across as the total arsehole on here?
    You?
    No, you.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    He's not wrong though. 50,196 is the Wednesday number.

    I haven't seen the Thursday number. My guess is that it's going to be in the high 40s.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    No I claimed correctly that the figure for 9th of November was 39000. You falsely claimed that the figure for I don't know which day was 45k, which it wasn't (because no day has had that number). Moron.
    Here you go. You said

    "50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November"

    So. Also. 50.196 is the figure for the 10th November. Is it? Really?

    Let's check.... ooh, the Robert Koch Institute? Let's check them?

    Ah.

    "Coronavirus Disease. Situation Report by the RKI Institute for Germany, 11/11/2021, Current Status For Germany

    Cases: 50,196"

    See that

    11/11/2021

    There. 11/11/2021


    Cases: 50, 196

    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Nov_2021/2021-11-11-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775
    HYUFD said:

    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Farooq said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Foxy said:

    kle4 said:

    Labour 295,278,267 votes? Blimey, that's a lot!

    If Starmer does not match it then he should GTFO, loser.
    Some interesting polls on this recently:

    How polls have changed since Starmer became leader:

    Redfield and Winton 🌹LAB+7, 🌳CON-12
    YouGov 🌹Lab+8, 🌳Con-16
    Opinium 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-16
    Ipsos MORI 🌹Lab+6, 🌳Con-17

    https://twitter.com/AdamRd1989/status/1457780064318222337?t=ahRAljpqCHBAtGgPUQIorQ&s=19

    All bar one do put Starmer 20 points ahead of the point before he became leader, and that was 19 points. I am not particularly a fan, but quite some swing.
    I've recently backed Starmer to be next PM in a modest way. 5ish BF. If anything though he's been drifting.I don't really get why as surely Boris is in more trouble than he's ever been. Is there some view that Labour would use the opportunity of any Tory leadership change to switch too?

    I'd really like to find a bet that focussed on the LD/Green race - perhaps "3rd party seatwise"? Would you 1000 on either the Tories or Labour? (Normally probably yes, but currently - not so sure)


    The trouble with the next Prime Minister market is you need to factor in that Boris might be replaced before the next election, in which case the next Prime Minister will be a Conservative and not Keir Starmer. We've seen this when going from Cameron to May and from May to Boris. The worse the polls get for the blue team, the more likely it is that Boris will walk, and the more likely it is that backbenchers will send in their letters.
    That's the bit I love.

    Starmer drifting must point to it being far worse for Boris than I envisioned.

    I was a bit wrong-footed by Maggie's departure. I suspect I'll not spot the signs again.
    Presumably Sunak's odds are tightening?
    No - basically unchanged.

    PS. Farooq, I need to offer you an apology. Some weeks ago I concluded that you were some sort of a Chinese infiltrator or other. I'm pretty sure I was wrong though. I'm not sure you're quite what you seem, but hey, who is!
    Is that what you thought? Ha, interesting to know.
    I assure you I'm sincere in my beliefs, and if anyone cares to have a summary of them (I feel my audience at this point wouldn't fill a phone box), it's that we do best as a country when we don't go lurching suddenly off on some mad scheme, when we look after each other, when we preserve our freedoms and stick up for those in the world who want to preserve and win their own. But not at any old price: sometimes we're best to leave well alone. Capitalism is best but turns sour with large wealth inequalities, and we need the odd dose of social democracy to keep us honest. I have fairly wide parameters to what I think acceptable governance looks like, and I think probably 500+ of our MPs are good people. Boris Johnson isn't one of them, and probably has never been a good person in all his wretched life. He's a selfish, dangerous bastard, but even he gets some things right.

    I don't have a lot of interest in China. I know their sabre rattling of Taiwan is wrong and their human rights is abysmal, but I also think their leadership has a streak of civilisation through it and they have a path to a better place without us throwing too much vinegar around. I'm much more worried by Russia's leadership, but all this comes from a fairly selfish point of view. I don't think China is really out to deliberately make my life worse, I'm just glad I don't live there. Putin, on the other hand, wants all of us to suffer. We need to watch China, but on Putin, we need to act.

    If you know of anyone who is willing to pay for me to spout off on any of the above, I'll gladly take the cash. As long as I'm paid to give my own opinion and not someone else's, I'll happily be an infiltrator.
    I thought Putin was the new hero of the non woke ultra right?
    I think there are those who have dabbled, but I think most even on the fairly strident right can see that Putin is an arsehole.
    Nick Griffin would be in the Putin camp. Farage would be on the borderline.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    He's not wrong though. 50,196 is the Wednesday number.

    I haven't seen the Thursday number. My guess is that it's going to be in the high 40s.
    No, but he got Wednesday entirely wrong. It was a record day. Today looks like 40-60k in Germany
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    He's not wrong though. 50,196 is the Wednesday number.

    I haven't seen the Thursday number. My guess is that it's going to be in the high 40s.
    No, but he got Wednesday entirely wrong. It was a record day. Today looks like 40-60k in Germany
    That's a spread so wide, you could fit a bus in it.
  • Options
    FarooqFarooq Posts: 10,775
    Foxy, I think he's about to offer you some kind of conversion therapy to cure the malady of your soul.
    And you'd be a fool to pass. What price spiritual purity?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    No I claimed correctly that the figure for 9th of November was 39000. You falsely claimed that the figure for I don't know which day was 45k, which it wasn't (because no day has had that number). Moron.
    Here you go. You said

    "50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November"

    So. Also. 50.196 is the figure for the 10th November. Is it? Really?

    Let's check.... ooh, the Robert Koch Institute? Let's check them?

    Ah.

    "Coronavirus Disease. Situation Report by the RKI Institute for Germany, 11/11/2021, Current Status For Germany

    Cases: 50,196"

    See that

    11/11/2021

    There. 11/11/2021


    Cases: 50, 196

    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Nov_2021/2021-11-11-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
    Hang on... only today, you were saying that German case numbers are updated during the day. And we all agreed that yesterday reached just over 50,000.

  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,796
    Pulpstar said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    dixiedean said:

    Hang on. It was called the Negro League. Never heard any baseball fan, woke or out and out racist, call it owt else.
    In fact it needs lifting to Major League status.

    Yes, but he didn't say that, he said

    "I’ve adopted the attitude of the great Negro, at the time, pitcher in the Negro Leagues, went on to become a great pitcher in the pros and Major League Baseball after Jackie Robinson."

    Taking out "at the time" - a place holder - he is saying "the great Negro pitcher in the Negro Leagues"

    That's what he is saying

    Or reduce it to basics, he says "the great Negro"

    Jesus F Christ not on PB as well. It's right there.
    He's clearly referring to the name of the league and mis-spoke. No he's not saying "the great Negro" at its basics, he's referring to the Negro League which was literally its name.
    But what does he actually SAY. I don't want your idle speculation, just repeat what he actually SAYS

    And what he actually SAYS is "Negro Leagues".
    Do you, or do you not, agree that Joe Biden says "the great Negro" in those words, in that order?
    From the quote you quoted I agree he says those words then immediately corrects himself.

    Its clear he's giving a compliment to a great player from the Negro League. He's not trying to offend anyone.
    Then we have no argument. He said it, we all heard it.

    What he actually *meant* we can only surmise, with our own prejudices and assumptions at work. I hope the next person who offends the Woke is given as much latitude as Sleepy Joe Biden
    Tbh I'm enjoying his presidency whilst it lasts, Biden is likely the last non woke Democrat president.

    From here on out it's the screeching woke left vs Trumpism.
    I don't think this analysis is quite right. One of the two has to eventually win, in a definitive way. If I had to choose between the two, I would choose Trump. Trump is bad, but the woke are more dangerous. What is quite telling is the one place that the woke make no progress at all is Russia and Eastern Europe. That is because, this is communism repeating itself, and it is quite telling watching educated people get sucked in to it, just as they were for much of the twentieth century.
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,245
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    No I claimed correctly that the figure for 9th of November was 39000. You falsely claimed that the figure for I don't know which day was 45k, which it wasn't (because no day has had that number). Moron.
    Here you go. You said

    "50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November"

    So. Also. 50.196 is the figure for the 10th November. Is it? Really?

    Let's check.... ooh, the Robert Koch Institute? Let's check them?

    Ah.

    "Coronavirus Disease. Situation Report by the RKI Institute for Germany, 11/11/2021, Current Status For Germany

    Cases: 50,196"

    See that

    11/11/2021

    There. 11/11/2021


    Cases: 50, 196

    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Nov_2021/2021-11-11-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
    You really are quite stupid aren't you? If you bothered to read your own link you would see the word "yesterday"

    as in

    "Yesterday, 50,196 new laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases as well as 235 new deaths associated with COVID-19 were
    transmitted to the RKI in Germany"

  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    edited November 2021
    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    He's not wrong though. 50,196 is the Wednesday number.

    I haven't seen the Thursday number. My guess is that it's going to be in the high 40s.
    No, but he got Wednesday entirely wrong. It was a record day. Today looks like 40-60k in Germany
    That's a spread so wide, you could fit a bus in it.
    Do you want a Christian gentleman's wager of one shilling paid to the next homeless person?

    Whoever is nearest wins, obvs, and has to pay the homeless person, thereby storing up treasures in heaven

    I reckon it will be 52k
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,077
    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    Looks like another record day in Germany, after all

    "Germany counted a staggering 50,196 new COVID-19 infections on Thursday, its highest count since the pandemic began."

    https://twitter.com/AnselmGibbs/status/1458912740597284871?s=20

    Given that RKI update into the early hours (or they did yesterday) this could hit 60,000?

    50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November.
    Yesterday you claimed the figure for yesterday was "39,000". You are clueless
    No I claimed correctly that the figure for 9th of November was 39000. You falsely claimed that the figure for I don't know which day was 45k, which it wasn't (because no day has had that number). Moron.
    Here you go. You said

    "50,196 is the figure for the 10th of November. It's not going to be updated. At some point tomorrow morning we will get the figures for the 11th of November"

    So. Also. 50.196 is the figure for the 10th November. Is it? Really?

    Let's check.... ooh, the Robert Koch Institute? Let's check them?

    Ah.

    "Coronavirus Disease. Situation Report by the RKI Institute for Germany, 11/11/2021, Current Status For Germany

    Cases: 50,196"

    See that

    11/11/2021

    There. 11/11/2021


    Cases: 50, 196

    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Nov_2021/2021-11-11-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
    You really are quite stupid aren't you? If you bothered to read your own link you would see the word "yesterday"

    as in

    "Yesterday, 50,196 new laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases as well as 235 new deaths associated with COVID-19 were
    transmitted to the RKI in Germany"

    You seem to forget how this argument began. YAWN

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,960
    I just got fired from my job, for asking the customers if they prefer smoking or non smoking.
    Apparently the correct term is cremation or burial.
This discussion has been closed.