politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The latest batch of Ashcroft marginals polling finds
Comments
-
@Sunil_Prasannan
'Ashcroft is one of the pollsters untested at a General Election, yes? '
As was Angus Red in 2010.
0 -
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories0 -
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
I'm on the SNP at 50/1 in Edinburgh North & Leith. Posts like yours are exquisite torture.Alistair said:
Edinburgh South West was 38% Yes at the referendumPong said:Hmm. So the gordon brown factor in Kirkcaldy was about 8%. I had overestimated his local popularity slightly.
Edinburgh South West is the real shock of the polls - the SNP @ 40% vs Lab 27% & Con 19%
SLAB might as well give up and go home.
Edinburgh North & Leith was 40% Yes and at longer SNP odds to Edinburgh South West0 -
@DavidL
'I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly'
We had a similar example last week with the Lib Dem private polling saying they were 'competitive' in seats like Solihull and a week later they are polling 5%.0 -
There's plenty of deprived council estates in Edinburgh (though not to the Glasgow extent) between the posh areas.Pong said:
That's what I found so astonishing. Based on the westminster constituency yes % breakdown, I was fairly confident that Edinburgh SW would underwhelm SNP expectations - Especially given the fairly low levels of deprivation.Alistair said:
Edinburgh South West was 38% Yes at the referendumPong said:Hmm. So the gordon brown factor in Kirkcaldy was about 8%. I had overestimated his local popularity slightly.
Edinburgh South West is the real shock of the polls - the SNP @ 40% vs Lab 27% & Con 19%
SLAB might as well give up and go home.
Edinburgh North & Leith was 40% Yes and at longer SNP odds to Edinburgh South West
I had the more affluent labour seats with decent majorities, like Edinburgh S, W & SW & East renfrewshire as *difficult* for the SNP to breach 30%. How wrong was I...
0 -
Can the blues make it a hattrick of poll leads with YouGov today?0
-
Marginals poll, not a National poll.MarkSenior said:
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
And which elected SNP MPs in 1974 and 1997.david_herdson said:
No, it's the rural, conservative Borders, which overwhelmingly voted No at the referendum.Dair said:
See this is a misconception.Pulpstar said:
Still highly winnable. Will Berwickshire go SNP or Tory though.TheScreamingEagles said:Will Scottish voters please think about my Scottish Tories vs The Pandas bet
Mundell probably holds...
There seems to be an idea that the Labour Party hierarchy and their vocal social media posters can issue a command and their vote will jump on for the Tories.
This isn't feasible in Scotland. Labour voters will not vote Tory. If anything, the publicity of the poll will drive Labour voters in Mundells constituency into the arms of a welcoming SNP.
This isn't West Central Scotland where Sectarianism is in play. Labour voters outside that area are not bound by allegiance to the Union/Queen/Northern Ireland.
0 -
Why not do something just before the official campaign starts? Get together and say they want him and Miliband in a 1v1 debate. I can't see how he riggles out of that.Sean_F said:
I think he thinks he has nothing to gain from a debate (he leads Milliband), and could potentially lose.kle4 said:
Hmm, obviously he keeps shifting position in order to ensure the debates don't happen while trying not to be blamed for it on account of cowardice (and surely the broadcasters won't like the idea of not getting their own exclusive debate to broadcast), but I'm really unclear what his problem with the format that was eventually proposed was - he got other left wing and regional parties who will potentially harm Labour's chances more than his involved, and a head to head with Ed M which though I don't think he would win as easily as many might think, would still be expected to work in his favour.Hengists_Gift said:Cameron plays yet more games:
David Cameron issues TV debate ultimatum
David Cameron has issued an ultimatum to the broadcasters over the TV debates, saying he will only take part in one contest featuring at least seven party leaders
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11450542/David-Cameron-issues-TV-debate-ultimatum.html
What was the problem with that from his perspective?
IMHO, the broadcasters ought to stage the debate with the chicken standing in for Cameron.0 -
@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.0
-
Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
So no debates then....
Spurs win (yay!!!) but so do the 6 above them....0 -
They have multiple candidates in one seat??TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Cammo going to get some crap over this debate offer, presumably thinks time is right to get it nailed down now rather than drag on further. Might that be as feels stronger with recent polling?0
-
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
He didn't really do himself any favours. Saying that, the way an officer lied about witnesses was pretty disgusting.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
Will they put his face on their campaign leaflets?TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Doesn't Blair work for some fairly unsavoury regimes? Hope it doesn't get used against any of the candidates. *innocent face*TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
There's space as they're not putting Ed Miliband's face on their campaign leaflets.TheWatcher said:
Will they put his face on their campaign leaflets?TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
106 candidates accepted the money. Presumably most of them will feel honour bound to be respectful in their comments about him in future.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Not at all. The worrying that about his situation though is that how it has ended will overshadow the despicable actions of a great many police officers involved in the whole affair.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
Whats happened with him now ?TheScreamingEagles said:
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
I think he was a victim of this country's libel system tbh. Yes yes I know he kind of made his own bed but I believe him over the copper tbh.0 -
Really? The same firm are filleting The Mirror, and James Price, his QC, is very highly regarded.TheScreamingEagles said:
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
Haile Selassie chucked money out of his car window in his final days as emperor.0
-
David Herdson,
"No, it's the rural, conservative Borders, which overwhelmingly voted No at the referendum."
Even in the Borders, the SNP topped the list vote for Holyrood 2011.
As no-one is actually voting for independence in GE 2015, it is entirely possible that Labour voters will now vote SNP to defeat Mundell, with anti-Toryism proving stronger than pro-unionism- which is not at immediate risk.
The Ashcroft poll has made the seat into a Tory/SNP battle which has made clear who those wishing to defeat the Tory should rationally vote for.
0 -
oh yes, i'm sure - I don't know Edinburgh at all.another_richard said:
There's plenty of deprived council estates in Edinburgh (though not to the Glasgow extent) between the posh areas.Pong said:
That's what I found so astonishing. Based on the westminster constituency yes % breakdown, I was fairly confident that Edinburgh SW would underwhelm SNP expectations - Especially given the fairly low levels of deprivation.Alistair said:
Edinburgh South West was 38% Yes at the referendumPong said:Hmm. So the gordon brown factor in Kirkcaldy was about 8%. I had overestimated his local popularity slightly.
Edinburgh South West is the real shock of the polls - the SNP @ 40% vs Lab 27% & Con 19%
SLAB might as well give up and go home.
Edinburgh North & Leith was 40% Yes and at longer SNP odds to Edinburgh South West
I had the more affluent labour seats with decent majorities, like Edinburgh S, W & SW & East renfrewshire as *difficult* for the SNP to breach 30%. How wrong was I...
I was largely relying on the SIND stats/constituency data.0 -
I can't imagine Broxtowe would not be on that list. Has Nick accepted the cash?antifrank said:
106 candidates accepted the money. Presumably most of them will feel honour bound to be respectful in their comments about him in future.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Not exactly, given that the seat was only created in 2005. In the two elections it has had, the SNP have polled 9.1 and 10.8%. Given the surge the SNP has had since then, I wouldn't write them off by any means but the idea that it's a hotbed of nationalism seems a little far-fetched. Nor can I see an enormous amount of pro-SNP tactical voting for a party which finished fourth last time coming from one which finished second.another_richard said:
And which elected SNP MPs in 1974 and 1997.david_herdson said:
No, it's the rural, conservative Borders, which overwhelmingly voted No at the referendum.Dair said:
See this is a misconception.Pulpstar said:
Still highly winnable. Will Berwickshire go SNP or Tory though.TheScreamingEagles said:Will Scottish voters please think about my Scottish Tories vs The Pandas bet
Mundell probably holds...
There seems to be an idea that the Labour Party hierarchy and their vocal social media posters can issue a command and their vote will jump on for the Tories.
This isn't feasible in Scotland. Labour voters will not vote Tory. If anything, the publicity of the poll will drive Labour voters in Mundells constituency into the arms of a welcoming SNP.
This isn't West Central Scotland where Sectarianism is in play. Labour voters outside that area are not bound by allegiance to the Union/Queen/Northern Ireland.0 -
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/plebgate-case-blunder-will-not-cost-andrew-mitchell-legal-team-vow-continue-libel-fight-sunTheWatcher said:
Really? The same firm are filleting The Mirror, and the QC is very highly regarded.TheScreamingEagles said:
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
0 -
Nick Palmer has always been unfailingly polite about all Labour leaders.JohnO said:
I can't imagine Broxtowe would not be on that list. Has Nick accepted the cash?antifrank said:
106 candidates accepted the money. Presumably most of them will feel honour bound to be respectful in their comments about him in future.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Paid out 80k to the copper.Pulpstar said:
Whats happened with him now ?TheScreamingEagles said:
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
I think he was a victim of this country's libel system tbh. Yes yes I know he kind of made his own bed but I believe him over the copper tbh.0 -
Looks like Montie is nicking my copy!!Scrapheap_as_was said:Cammo going to get some crap over this debate offer, presumably thinks time is right to get it nailed down now rather than drag on further. Might that be as feels stronger with recent polling?
Tim Montgomerie ن@montie·16 secs16 seconds ago
With Tories slowly moving ahead in polls Cameron would be mad to give Miliband opportunity for momentum. Right decision to kill elxn debates0 -
Indeed he has.antifrank said:
Nick Palmer has always been unfailingly polite about all Labour leaders.JohnO said:
I can't imagine Broxtowe would not be on that list. Has Nick accepted the cash?antifrank said:
106 candidates accepted the money. Presumably most of them will feel honour bound to be respectful in their comments about him in future.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Nope. And cranking up the sample size beyond what is adequate doesn't improve accuracy.MarkSenior said:
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
I know it sounds unlikely and I'm not saying it's true but I heard Blair was a Labour Party supporter, so maybe he wants them to win.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
In Norwich North, note the high UKIP share. These poor kippers are going to hear an awful lot about the idea of going to bed with Nigel and waking up with Ed. Which is the sort of night that I wouldn't wish on anyone.0
-
And does he pay UK tax...Hertsmere_Pubgoer said:
Doesn't Blair work for some fairly unsavoury regimes? Hope it doesn't get used against any of the candidates. *innocent face*TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
8,000 figure comes from 1,000-strong samples in eight marginals?Ishmael_X said:
Nope. And cranking up the sample size beyond what is adequate doesn't improve accuracy.MarkSenior said:
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb
0 -
@TelePolitics: David Cameron issues 'final offer' over TV debates http://t.co/2zTptVnsfC0
-
The Labour leadership must rule out a pact with the Tories after this poll.It's a case of damage limitation.Ian Davidson who has done so much to reveal the blacklisting of workers would be a loss,as would Katy Clarke.This is self-harm by the Scots to remove people of this quality.
Electoral registration will decide things in the English marginals.There is not long to correct the Tories gerrymandering of the electoral registration.Voter registration will decide these.0 -
0
-
Remember you have on here, Labour supporters, who in all honesty, say Blair is a Tory.edmundintokyo said:
I know it sounds unlikely and I'm not saying it's true but I heard Blair was a Labour Party supporter, so maybe he wants them to win.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
R5 running with the story that Cameron has told them (not BBC has learned), that he wants one debate, 7 leaders, must be this month. High stakes from Cameron, could blow up in his face.
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/573241301598126080
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/5732430249956966400 -
Edinburgh is inevitably similar to London in that way - lots of rich / well paid / educated people making the stats look good but also meaning a lot of inequality.Pong said:
oh yes, i'm sure - I don't know Edinburgh at all.another_richard said:
There's plenty of deprived council estates in Edinburgh (though not to the Glasgow extent) between the posh areas.Pong said:
That's what I found so astonishing. Based on the westminster constituency yes % breakdown, I was fairly confident that Edinburgh SW would underwhelm SNP expectations - Especially given the fairly low levels of deprivation.Alistair said:
Edinburgh South West was 38% Yes at the referendumPong said:Hmm. So the gordon brown factor in Kirkcaldy was about 8%. I had overestimated his local popularity slightly.
Edinburgh South West is the real shock of the polls - the SNP @ 40% vs Lab 27% & Con 19%
SLAB might as well give up and go home.
Edinburgh North & Leith was 40% Yes and at longer SNP odds to Edinburgh South West
I had the more affluent labour seats with decent majorities, like Edinburgh S, W & SW & East renfrewshire as *difficult* for the SNP to breach 30%. How wrong was I...
I was largely relying on the SIND stats/constituency data.
0 -
HANDBAGS!!!!
Tim Montgomerie ن@montie·40 secs41 seconds ago
Enjoying @May2015 giving @MSmithsonPB a thoroughly deserved kicking https://twitter.com/May2015NS/status/573233597307596801 …
Tim Montgomerie ن retweeted
May2015@May2015NS·50 mins50 minutes ago
If you like your politics news to be derivative, uncredited and shameless, make sure you're following @MSmithsonPB.0 -
Cameron's behavior Re. the debate's is quite outrageous, to be honest. But the thing is, it looks like he's actually going to get away with it!0
-
I think so. There is much that is obscure about tonight's perfformance.Sunil_Prasannan said:
8,000 figure comes from 1,000-strong samples in eight marginals?Ishmael_X said:
Nope. And cranking up the sample size beyond what is adequate doesn't improve accuracy.MarkSenior said:
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
Camerons position on the debates is completely unacceptable.
If he is invited and doesnt turn up he should be empty chaired0 -
No broadcaster is going to "empty chair" the Prime Minister...bigjohnowls said:Camerons position on the debates is completely unacceptable.
If he is invited and doesnt turn up he should be empty chaired
0 -
Scrapheap_as_was said:
HANDBAGS!!!!
Tim Montgomerie ن@montie·40 secs41 seconds ago
Enjoying @May2015 giving @MSmithsonPB a thoroughly deserved kicking twitter.com/May2015NS/status/573233597307596801 …
Tim Montgomerie ن retweeted
May2015@May2015NS·50 mins50 minutes ago
If you like your politics news to be derivative, uncredited and shameless, make sure you're following @MSmithsonPB.
Aren't they both just working through Lord A's polls, so they would be similar?
0 -
I can't imagine whatever happens the broadcasters are going to be very happy with Cameron. Lets say he does get his way, could it be short term gain, long term pain as BBC, Sky, C4 etc pile into him for basically screwing up what would have been a nice little earner.0
-
News from Bradford
George Galloway @georgegalloway 45s45 seconds ago
I'm not sure my current New Labour opponent is going to last much longer in the contest than her predecessor. Watch this space...0 -
I wonder if Gordon will now donate £2,000 to each of those candidates.edmundintokyo said:
I know it sounds unlikely and I'm not saying it's true but I heard Blair was a Labour Party supporter, so maybe he wants them to win.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
We know how he likes to outdo Blair.
0 -
I find table 1, Page 2 of Ashcroft's National Poll very surprising.
For instance, of the GE10 LDs, 17% said they'd vote UKIP compared with 12% going to the Greens. Also the Labour core vote at 83% is much higher than the 72% Tory core (because only 8% of Lab are going UKIP compared with 20% of Tory).
I have adjusted the assumptions of switching behaviour in my model and checked them against the individual constituencies polled. (I don't use "swing" parameters as I consider it old-fashioned and unsuited to what is happening).
The result, which is only a feasible scenario based on current polling and is therefore not a forecast, is as follows:
Con 33.5% share, 266 seats
Lab 33.5% share, 280 seats
LD 6.8% share, 25 seats
UKIP 17.5% share, 2 seats
Grn 4.7% share, 1 seat
SNP 3.6% share, 55 seats0 -
Lord Ashcroft ✔ @LordAshcroft
Just had dinner at the Chiltern Firehouse. Didn't bump into @David_Cameron but it was overrated and underwhelming
0 -
EICIPM!!Barnesian said:I find table 1, Page 2 of Ashcroft's National Poll very surprising.
For instance, of the GE10 LDs, 17% said they'd vote UKIP compared with 12% going to the Greens. Also the Labour core vote at 83% is much higher than the 72% Tory core (because only 8% of Lab are going UKIP compared with 20% of Tory).
I have adjusted the assumptions of switching behaviour in my model and checked them against the individual constituencies polled. (I don't use "swing" parameters as I consider it old-fashioned and unsuited to what is happening).
The result, which is only a feasible scenario based on current polling and is therefore not a forecast, is as follows:
Con 33.5% share, 266 seats
Lab 33.5% share, 280 seats
LD 6.8% share, 25 seats
UKIP 17.5% share, 2 seats
Grn 4.7% share, 1 seat
SNP 3.6% share, 55 seats0 -
If I was a candidate, I wouldn't touch Blair's money with a bargepole.foxinsoxuk said:
And does he pay UK tax...Hertsmere_Pubgoer said:
Doesn't Blair work for some fairly unsavoury regimes? Hope it doesn't get used against any of the candidates. *innocent face*TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Probably, but by all accounts Cameron will be quitting in 2017/2018 anyway, so I doubt he'll care much...FrancisUrquhart said:I can't imagine whatever happens the broadcasters are going to be very happy with Cameron. Lets say he does get his way, could it be short term gain, long term pain as BBC, Sky, C4 etc pile into him for basically screwing up what would have been a nice little earner.
0 -
Christ no - lolbigjohnowls said:News from Bradford
George Galloway @georgegalloway 45s45 seconds ago
I'm not sure my current New Labour opponent is going to last much longer in the contest than her predecessor. Watch this space...0 -
The Chiltern Firehouse is so last year. The Clove Club is where it's at in early 2015. Though I may be a fortnight out of date now.Tykejohnno said:
Lord Ashcroft ✔ @LordAshcroft
Just had dinner at the Chiltern Firehouse. Didn't bump into @David_Cameron but it was overrated and underwhelming0 -
Well, he shouldn't have called the copper a f*cking pleb.Pulpstar said:
Whats happened with him now ?TheScreamingEagles said:
No, his legal team didn't inspire much confidence either.another_richard said:Am I the only person who thinks Andrew Mitchell has been hard done by ?
I think he was a victim of this country's libel system tbh. Yes yes I know he kind of made his own bed but I believe him over the copper tbh.
0 -
Lord A going to be giving it a good rating on TripAdvisor then :-)antifrank said:
The Chiltern Firehouse is so last year. The Clove Club is where it's at in early 2015. Though I may be a fortnight out of date now.Tykejohnno said:
Lord Ashcroft ✔ @LordAshcroft
Just had dinner at the Chiltern Firehouse. Didn't bump into @David_Cameron but it was overrated and underwhelming0 -
I'm probably also loosely Labour-supporting (at least vs Con) but I'd vote for almost any Tory over Tony Blair. However, he probably does still have some genuine loyalty to Labour.TheScreamingEagles said:
Remember you have on here, Labour supporters, who in all honesty, say Blair is a Tory.edmundintokyo said:
I know it sounds unlikely and I'm not saying it's true but I heard Blair was a Labour Party supporter, so maybe he wants them to win.FrankBooth said:
Has Blair explained why he's donating money to the Labour campaign? Presumably to strengthen his position if Labour lose? He can say well we tried it Ed's way and I backed him. Now let's go back to doing things my way.TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
Pecunia non olet.Hertsmere_Pubgoer said:
If I was a candidate, I wouldn't touch Blair's money with a bargepole.foxinsoxuk said:
And does he pay UK tax...Hertsmere_Pubgoer said:
Doesn't Blair work for some fairly unsavoury regimes? Hope it doesn't get used against any of the candidates. *innocent face*TheScreamingEagles said:@michaelsavage: BREAKING: Tony Blair has donated £1,000 to every Labour candidate in one of the party's 106 battleground target seats.
0 -
1 debate is still 1 debate too many. But having it before the official start of the campaign will reduce the impact and see off this pointless concept once and for all.
I agree with Dave!0 -
He has an election to try and win in the first place...I would have thought he might care about that? But then maybe not, chillaxing could well be more appealing.GIN1138 said:
Probably, but by all accounts Cameron will be quitting in 2017/2018 anyway, so I doubt he'll care much...FrancisUrquhart said:I can't imagine whatever happens the broadcasters are going to be very happy with Cameron. Lets say he does get his way, could it be short term gain, long term pain as BBC, Sky, C4 etc pile into him for basically screwing up what would have been a nice little earner.
0 -
Sun Politics @SunPolitics · 6s 6 seconds ago
YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour and Tories tied: CON 34%, LAB 34%, LD 8%, UKIP 14%, GRN 6%0 -
YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour and Tories tied: CON 34%, LAB 34%, LD 8%, UKIP 14%, GRN 6%0
-
YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour and Tories tied: CON 34%, LAB 34%, LD 8%, UKIP 14%, GRN 6%0
-
Plunging Baby Eaters falling apart - Yougov Tie.0
-
They should invite Clegg (and Farage?) and empty-chair Cameron0
-
Tonights YG EICIPM0
-
The broadcasters will have to be fair through the election campaign. They may try and get revenge afterwards but as long as Cam get's back into Maggie's Den I doubt he'll care...FrancisUrquhart said:
He has an election to try and win in the first place...I would have thought he might care about that? But then maybe not, chillaxing could well be more appealing.GIN1138 said:
Probably, but by all accounts Cameron will be quitting in 2017/2018 anyway, so I doubt he'll care much...FrancisUrquhart said:I can't imagine whatever happens the broadcasters are going to be very happy with Cameron. Lets say he does get his way, could it be short term gain, long term pain as BBC, Sky, C4 etc pile into him for basically screwing up what would have been a nice little earner.
0 -
And do you think the surge in SNP support is based upon nationalism rather than upon which party is likely to get the most for Scotland ?david_herdson said:
Not exactly, given that the seat was only created in 2005. In the two elections it has had, the SNP have polled 9.1 and 10.8%. Given the surge the SNP has had since then, I wouldn't write them off by any means but the idea that it's a hotbed of nationalism seems a little far-fetched. Nor can I see an enormous amount of pro-SNP tactical voting for a party which finished fourth last time coming from one which finished second.another_richard said:
And which elected SNP MPs in 1974 and 1997.david_herdson said:
No, it's the rural, conservative Borders, which overwhelmingly voted No at the referendum.Dair said:
See this is a misconception.Pulpstar said:
Still highly winnable. Will Berwickshire go SNP or Tory though.TheScreamingEagles said:Will Scottish voters please think about my Scottish Tories vs The Pandas bet
Mundell probably holds...
There seems to be an idea that the Labour Party hierarchy and their vocal social media posters can issue a command and their vote will jump on for the Tories.
This isn't feasible in Scotland. Labour voters will not vote Tory. If anything, the publicity of the poll will drive Labour voters in Mundells constituency into the arms of a welcoming SNP.
This isn't West Central Scotland where Sectarianism is in play. Labour voters outside that area are not bound by allegiance to the Union/Queen/Northern Ireland.
Voting SNP is effectively a free vote in Scotland.
0 -
Chanel 5's Farage lovers......hatchet job of the highest order.0
-
Can't wait for SeanT to come and tell us that Cameron still really really wants the debates and this is all a negotiating tactic.0
-
Perhaps he thought it was a debate so chickened out.Tykejohnno said:
Lord Ashcroft ✔ @LordAshcroft
Just had dinner at the Chiltern Firehouse. Didn't bump into @David_Cameron but it was overrated and underwhelming0 -
The last 5 Yougov polls have 1% Con lead, tie, 3% Con lead, 2% Con lead, tie.0
-
-
Well done Gin again ;-)0
-
Broken sleazy Tories on the slide?GIN1138 said:Sun Politics @SunPolitics · 6s 6 seconds ago
YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour and Tories tied: CON 34%, LAB 34%, LD 8%, UKIP 14%, GRN 6%0 -
Before dumping all my life savings on it I have to keep reminding myself the Edinburgh North and Leith is more than just Leith. The North part of the name encompasses some of the most snobbish high class bits of Edinburgh.It's a weird constituency.antifrank said:
I'm on the SNP at 50/1 in Edinburgh North & Leith. Posts like yours are exquisite torture.Alistair said:
Edinburgh South West was 38% Yes at the referendumPong said:Hmm. So the gordon brown factor in Kirkcaldy was about 8%. I had overestimated his local popularity slightly.
Edinburgh South West is the real shock of the polls - the SNP @ 40% vs Lab 27% & Con 19%
SLAB might as well give up and go home.
Edinburgh North & Leith was 40% Yes and at longer SNP odds to Edinburgh South West
0 -
Re Andrew Mitchell:
Career in ruins
Reputation in ruins
Lost a fortune
but it was Mitchell who was the victim of the crime !!!
And the criminals were police.
Isn't this sort of thing only meant to happen in thugocracies and banana republics ???
0 -
Indeed very good at this GinTykejohnno said:Well done Gin again ;-)
0 -
UKIP supporter "piss off back to your own country" followed by "I hope there are no racists in UKIP".....tv journalism at it's highest.0
-
In 2010, the LDs had a lot of swing voters and previous non-voter support, courtesy of Clegg's debate performances. It's not unreasonable to see that kind of voter drifting to UKIP. Indeed, the Lib Dems made (and make) great play of not being the other two and many of their former voters backed them mainly in opposition to someone else.Barnesian said:I find table 1, Page 2 of Ashcroft's National Poll very surprising.
For instance, of the GE10 LDs, 17% said they'd vote UKIP compared with 12% going to the Greens. Also the Labour core vote at 83% is much higher than the 72% Tory core (because only 8% of Lab are going UKIP compared with 20% of Tory).
I have adjusted the assumptions of switching behaviour in my model and checked them against the individual constituencies polled. (I don't use "swing" parameters as I consider it old-fashioned and unsuited to what is happening).
The result, which is only a feasible scenario based on current polling and is therefore not a forecast, is as follows:
Con 33.5% share, 266 seats
Lab 33.5% share, 280 seats
LD 6.8% share, 25 seats
UKIP 17.5% share, 2 seats
Grn 4.7% share, 1 seat
SNP 3.6% share, 55 seats
Similarly, Labour's 2010 score was far closer to their true core vote whereas the Tories' was bulked out by a lot of swing voters who've since moved on. To compare like with like, you'd need baselines where the two parties were at similar positions support-wise (maybe the Tories in 2013, for example). That said, I don't think there's much doubt that many of UKIP's recruits since 2010 were formerly core Con voters.
I'm intrigued as to why you think UKIP will poll 17.5% when they're currently well below that and falling. Election coverage may help but not all publicity is good publicity.0 -
Toby Perkins MP @tobyperkinsmp 2m2 minutes ago
Just when you think @SunPolitics couldn't possibly get more ridiculous. This: "David Cameron throws down TV debates gauntlet"
How can anyone defend the way he has acted over the debates?0 -
Tim Montgomerie ن ✔ @montie
So, so partisan: @campbellclaret - who did not let Blair debate - attacks Cameron for not debating! https://twitter.com/campbellclaret
Alastair Campbell ✔ @campbellclaret
@David_Cameron bottling because he has no record to defend and no vision of the future. If @Ed_Miliband is as bad as he says why so scared?
0 -
Apparently the judge thought the policeman was too thick to make up the insult "pleb".another_richard said:Re Andrew Mitchell:
Career in ruins
Reputation in ruins
Lost a fortune
but it was Mitchell who was the victim of the crime !!!
And the criminals were police.
Isn't this sort of thing only meant to happen in thugocracies and banana republics ???
One man's word against another.0 -
Nick Clegg @nick_clegg · 14m 14 minutes ago
.@David_Cameron The British public want the debates so let's get on with it. Stop holding them to ransom by trying to dictate the terms.0 -
Of course it doesn't . Why don't you simply go to his website and study the figures ?Sunil_Prasannan said:
8,000 figure comes from 1,000-strong samples in eight marginals?Ishmael_X said:
Nope. And cranking up the sample size beyond what is adequate doesn't improve accuracy.MarkSenior said:
The one carried out last week and published today was over 8,000Sunil_Prasannan said:
Ashcroft national polls are c. 1,000 strong.MarkSenior said:
Not in the 8,000 strong Ashcroft National Poll which was carried out only last week .DavidL said:I think this shows some of the problem for constituency polls. Even if they are balanced and reliable they tend to go out of date fairly quickly and reflect the national polling at the time they have taken.
Since most of these polls were taken there has clearly been a movement in favour of the Tories
1,003 27th Feb-1st Mar
1,004 20-22nd Feb0 -
Do we really though ?Artist said:Nick Clegg @nick_clegg · 14m 14 minutes ago
.@David_Cameron The British public want the debates so let's get on with it. Stop holding them to ransom by trying to dictate the terms.
0 -
I'd call putting a Labour government in place a very expensive vote.another_richard said:
And do you think the surge in SNP support is based upon nationalism rather than upon which party is likely to get the most for Scotland ?david_herdson said:
Not exactly, given that the seat was only created in 2005. In the two elections it has had, the SNP have polled 9.1 and 10.8%. Given the surge the SNP has had since then, I wouldn't write them off by any means but the idea that it's a hotbed of nationalism seems a little far-fetched. Nor can I see an enormous amount of pro-SNP tactical voting for a party which finished fourth last time coming from one which finished second.another_richard said:
And which elected SNP MPs in 1974 and 1997.david_herdson said:
No, it's the rural, conservative Borders, which overwhelmingly voted No at the referendum.Dair said:
See this is a misconception.Pulpstar said:
Still highly winnable. Will Berwickshire go SNP or Tory though.TheScreamingEagles said:Will Scottish voters please think about my Scottish Tories vs The Pandas bet
Mundell probably holds...
There seems to be an idea that the Labour Party hierarchy and their vocal social media posters can issue a command and their vote will jump on for the Tories.
This isn't feasible in Scotland. Labour voters will not vote Tory. If anything, the publicity of the poll will drive Labour voters in Mundells constituency into the arms of a welcoming SNP.
This isn't West Central Scotland where Sectarianism is in play. Labour voters outside that area are not bound by allegiance to the Union/Queen/Northern Ireland.
Voting SNP is effectively a free vote in Scotland.0 -
These lesbians seem conflicted about UKIP.0
-
Oh no we don't.Artist said:Nick Clegg @nick_clegg · 14m 14 minutes ago
.@David_Cameron The British public want the debates so let's get on with it. Stop holding them to ransom by trying to dictate the terms.0