Skip to content

Prime Minister Andy Burnham starts with low expectations – politicalbetting.com

1246711

Comments

  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,211
    Cambridge 2 - 0 Oxford
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531
    biggles said:

    Tuchel as Secretary of State for Defence?

    A deep block against those pesky Argies... across the Midlands?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 73,413

    DougSeal said:

    Anyone predict the CoE? Anyone?

    @kinabalu did and tipped it.
    I just won £7 as I was on at 12 but with a sprinkle of other possibles. Nandy would have been massive pay out but obvs unlikely.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 29,486
    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    biggles said:

    Tuchel as Secretary of State for Defence?

    As long as he doesn't look to get Madueke on the field.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,324
    There are a lot of resignations/sackings. It's like there was a GE: all the tired old ministers are out and are replaced by new blood. Like the fresh-faced ingenue Miliband
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 129,882
    edited July 20

    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.

    Whacking up my taxes but you know what I cannot complain if I moan about defence being underfunded and he puts up the additional rate of tax to pay for it.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 23,311

    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.

    There's no hiding place in this appointment, is there?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531

    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.

    Whacking up my taxes but you know what I cannot complain if I moan about defence being underfunded and he puts up the additional rate of tax to pay for it.
    Tax on French cheese and pineapple pizzas?
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,618
    New Labour returns. Things can only get …
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639
    This may be a bit harsh on both of them - a new PM might reasonably just mean time for new blood - but I do think there is a general feeling, not entirely unearned, that politics is inherently a bad thing, and so as much as possible we should put non-politicians in charge, or divest politicians of responsibility for things. It can be a cheap, easy solution, but then makes it harder to be responsible when we want them to be responsible.

    And of course, when you put non-politicians into political situation, politics happens regardless, that is life.

    Both Vallance and Timpson have resigned. Think it speaks to something - always such a clamour for GOATs, from outside politics, bring real sector expertise, yet inevitably (see same under Brown), they often struggle to adapt to politics. Maybe because politics itself is a skill?
    https://nitter.poast.org/LukeTryl/status/2079179722198511787#m
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 129,882

    DougSeal said:

    Anyone predict the CoE? Anyone?

    @kinabalu did and tipped it.
    I just won £7 as I was on at 12 but with a sprinkle of other possibles. Nandy would have been massive pay out but obvs unlikely.
    I’ve already spent my Mahmood as Chancellor winnings. Oops.
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 5,598
    We haven't had a Healey as a chancellor for a while...

    (Silly Billy)
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511
    Thomas-Symonds, the latest to go, served both as the Paymaster General and as the Minister for the Constitution and European Union Relations.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,791
    DougSeal said:

    Anyone predict the CoE? Anyone?

    I suspect it may be John Healey.

    Well know shortly.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639
    In terms of expectation I'd agree (Ed M was dishonest in later years about what the Syria vote was at the time vs what he later pretended it was), but if it meant he had less impact on other policies? Foreign Secretary is no longer the great office it still pretends, when the PM gets to go to all the good gigs and is at the end of the phone at all times.

    Putting Ed Miliband in as foreign secretary after his appalling Syria vote in 2013 is a disgrace.
    https://nitter.poast.org/OzKaterji/status/2079174481268916336#m
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 129,882

    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.

    Whacking up my taxes but you know what I cannot complain if I moan about defence being underfunded and he puts up the additional rate of tax to pay for it.
    Tax on French cheese and pineapple pizzas?
    I like French cheese.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639
    Steve Reed's punchy response perhaps demonstrates why he put out the Local Government Reorganisation stuff end of last week, to make it harder for any new Secretary to adjust.

    Keir Starmer showed loyalty to me by appointing me to his Cabinet. I make no apology for returning that loyalty. It’s what is expected of functioning teams, and I hope those who did not show loyalty to Keir will now show it to you. I’m proud I acted with integrity at every step over the turbulent past few months.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511
    We are now up to 11 individuals who sat around the cabinet table of previous Prime Minister Keir Starmer who have been sacked or left the government now that Andy Burnham is in No 10.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690

    John Healey’s a Cambridge gentleman, he’ll be an awesome Chancellor.

    First time we have had a non Oxford educated PM and Chancellor since Brown and Darling and first time we have had a Cambridge educated PM and Chancellor since Arthur Balfour and Austen Chamberlain
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311
    edited July 20

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and higher rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311

    Be interesting to see how well Healey funds Defence now.

    Whacking up my taxes but you know what I cannot complain if I moan about defence being underfunded and he puts up the additional rate of tax to pay for it.
    That will do the opposite, although I agree it'd be politically unsustainable to not increase top rate too.

    The only serious revenue raisers are basic and higher rate.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    So defence is a priority but so is cutting the cost of living. Guns and butter. I thought he was wanting to go back to the 1970s but it looks like he is going back a lot further.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,791

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    Taxing our way to growth. Marvellous.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    Battlebus said:

    New Labour returns. Things can only get …

    Hardly, this looks like a Brown government with a Corbynite twinge replacing a vaguely New Labour government if anything, just with Burnham a bit more charismatic than Brown
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    That's a bit rich, given the insults you've hurled at me over the years.

    But I forgive you - you (and others on here) save me from the echo chamber of my progressive friends.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 23,311
    edited July 20
    I think British politics is finally about to stabilize.

    Burnham will win en election (probably in Spring) meaning he'll be PM for longer than anyone since Cameron. Farage is imploding. He won't lead REF at the election. As a result, Reform will fall apart amid much very entertaining recrimination and in-fighting.

    Conservatives are alive thanks to Kemi. When Labour eventually gets turfed out the Tories will take over...

    The two-party system survives... We endure!












    If we have a gilt strike in September and everything falls apart, I'm the new Ragersarmus! 😂


  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 28,085
    Does Burnham count as educated at a comprehensive?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    Jonathan said:

    Cambridge 2 - 0 Oxford

    0 PPE so far too, Burnham studied English, Healey SPS
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311

    We haven't had a Healey as a chancellor for a while...

    (Silly Billy)

    Amazing how many names have fallen out of fashion since then: Roy, Reg, Eric, Nigel, Ron..

    Of course some come back, like Archibald (Archie).
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 6,162
    Pat McFadden walking up
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511
    edited July 20
    A few strange ones for me getting the chop. Boring experienced plodders like Benn in the unglamarous roles but where continuinity seems preferable.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    kle4 said:

    In terms of expectation I'd agree (Ed M was dishonest in later years about what the Syria vote was at the time vs what he later pretended it was), but if it meant he had less impact on other policies? Foreign Secretary is no longer the great office it still pretends, when the PM gets to go to all the good gigs and is at the end of the phone at all times.

    Putting Ed Miliband in as foreign secretary after his appalling Syria vote in 2013 is a disgrace.
    https://nitter.poast.org/OzKaterji/status/2079174481268916336#m

    Let's face it, Ed Miliband is just a shit. Wherever he ends up things will not go well.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311

    DougSeal said:

    Anyone predict the CoE? Anyone?

    @kinabalu did and tipped it.
    I just won £7 as I was on at 12 but with a sprinkle of other possibles. Nandy would have been massive pay out but obvs unlikely.
    I was about to clean out my Mahmood an hour ago and throw it all on Healey but decided it was all internet rumour and no-one knew anything.

    Grr.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    edited July 20
    tlg86 said:

    Does Burnham count as educated at a comprehensive?

    Yes, he went to a Roman Catholic comp/high school with a technology specialism. Burnham will be the second PM fully educated at a comprehensive for their secondary education after Truss
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 5,022

    Pat McFadden walking up

    He did that walk like a man who's never walked before.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,791
    GIN1138 said:

    I think British politics is finally about to stabilize.

    Burnham will win en election (probably in Spring) meaning he'll be PM for longer than anyone since Cameron. Farage is imploding. He won't lead REF at the election. As a result, Reform will fall apart amid much very entertaining recrimination and in-fighting.

    Conservatives are alive thanks to Kemi. When Labour eventually gets turfed out the Tories will take over...

    The two-party system survives... We endure!












    If we have a gilt strike in September, I'm the new Ragersarmus! 😂


    Quite a few people across the divide have suggested Farage won’t lead Reform.

    Conversely I think that may help them. On a micro level I know people, like my in-laws, who should be certs for Reform but won’t touch it because of him.

    Of course he will attract others. Would they stay ?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311
    DavidL said:

    kle4 said:

    In terms of expectation I'd agree (Ed M was dishonest in later years about what the Syria vote was at the time vs what he later pretended it was), but if it meant he had less impact on other policies? Foreign Secretary is no longer the great office it still pretends, when the PM gets to go to all the good gigs and is at the end of the phone at all times.

    Putting Ed Miliband in as foreign secretary after his appalling Syria vote in 2013 is a disgrace.
    https://nitter.poast.org/OzKaterji/status/2079174481268916336#m

    Let's face it, Ed Miliband is just a shit. Wherever he ends up things will not go well.
    I wouldn't say he's a shit, knifing his brother aside, he's just a hard-working fanatic.

    Which makes him dangerous.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531
    edited July 20
    I realise by the time I post this the announcement will probably have come out but Miliband to Foreign Sec and Mahmood stays as Home Sec?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 62,611

    John Healey is COE

    That's one decent appointment.

    I very much doubt I'll like all his policies, but he's certainly worthy of respect.
    Yeah, fair play to Burnham for that one.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 29,486
    Burnham, Healey, Cooper, Miliband . . .

    Seems he's giving a job to everyone left from the Blair/Brown era.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    That's a bit rich, given the insults you've hurled at me over the years.

    But I forgive you - you (and others on here) save me from the echo chamber of my progressive friends.
    Maybe if you didn't piss me off so much, you'd get less insults?

    I like and respect Labour posters on here like @Mexicanpete and @Jonathan

    It doesn't have to be like this. But you like to make things personal, and then I respond in kind.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,565
    One thing we need to see the end of are those constant leaks in the run up to the budgets .
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,565
    One thing we need to see the end of are those constant leaks in the run up to the budgets .
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    edited July 20

    Burnham, Healey, Cooper, Miliband . . .

    Seems he's giving a job to everyone left from the Blair/Brown era.

    Lammy and Hilary Benn were in government then and have been sacked
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,324
    edited July 20

    We are now up to 11 individuals who sat around the cabinet table of previous Prime Minister Keir Starmer who have been sacked or left the government now that Andy Burnham is in No 10.

    Indeed. Departures so far

    Darren Jones is out as chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy is out as Justice Secretary and Deputy PM
    Hilary Benn is out as Northern Ireland Secretary
    Jenny Chapman is out as international development minister
    Jo Stevens is out as Wales Secretary
    Liz Kendall is out as Technology Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds is out as paymaster general and Cabinet Office minister
    Peter Kyle is out as Business Secretary
    Rachel Reeves is out as Chancellor
    Richard Hermer is out as Attorney General
    Steve Reed is out as Housing Secretary
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    DavidL said:

    kle4 said:

    In terms of expectation I'd agree (Ed M was dishonest in later years about what the Syria vote was at the time vs what he later pretended it was), but if it meant he had less impact on other policies? Foreign Secretary is no longer the great office it still pretends, when the PM gets to go to all the good gigs and is at the end of the phone at all times.

    Putting Ed Miliband in as foreign secretary after his appalling Syria vote in 2013 is a disgrace.
    https://nitter.poast.org/OzKaterji/status/2079174481268916336#m

    Let's face it, Ed Miliband is just a shit. Wherever he ends up things will not go well.
    Foreign Secretary. He will hopefully do less damage there than in anything material.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,855
    Miliband going to FO
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 8,014
    Miliband F Sec. Jeez
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639
    Taz said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I think British politics is finally about to stabilize.

    Burnham will win en election (probably in Spring) meaning he'll be PM for longer than anyone since Cameron. Farage is imploding. He won't lead REF at the election. As a result, Reform will fall apart amid much very entertaining recrimination and in-fighting.

    Conservatives are alive thanks to Kemi. When Labour eventually gets turfed out the Tories will take over...

    The two-party system survives... We endure!


    If we have a gilt strike in September, I'm the new Ragersarmus! 😂


    Quite a few people across the divide have suggested Farage won’t lead Reform.

    Conversely I think that may help them. On a micro level I know people, like my in-laws, who should be certs for Reform but won’t touch it because of him.

    Of course he will attract others. Would they stay ?

    2 years ago him going would have been fatal. Now? They have made a bit play about how they are basically the Tories, but done right this time. So as long as the Faragian elements don't decamp en masse (and where would they go? Restore hates Farage and presumably Farageists), it could be useful.

    But I don't think he's going anywhere yet - all the big people in Reform are still utterly servile in defending him, showing he still has the whip hand over them.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 6,162
    Ed Miliband will be taking lots of flights in his new role

  • Ed Miliband will be taking lots of flights in his new role

    Hope he remembers to offset his carbon footprint. I'm sure he'll enjoy spending lots of time talking to JD Vance.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 8,033
    Miliband Foreign Secretary
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311
    Taz said:

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    Taxing our way to growth. Marvellous.
    I would far rather cut welfare, pensions and move healthcare to a mixed funding system, and free up the cash that way, but that's never going to happen.

    So if tax rises are the only way the nation stays safe and is protected then, as the lesser of two evils, then that's what we must do. They are the fairest, broadest and most reliable revenue raisers as well, and give some scope to iron out some of the ludicrous incentives elsewhere.

    As a Thatcherite aside, I'm increasingly coming to the view that privatising the roads is a good idea - just so they bloody well get maintained properly.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511
    nico67 said:

    One thing we need to see the end of are those constant leaks in the run up to the budgets .

    Even stopping the leaks about leaks would be an improvement ;-)
  • Mahmood stays as Home Sec, sensible.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,855

    Mahmood stays as Home Sec, sensible.

    Excellent.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 29,486
    Makes sense to send Miliband to F Sec.

    Rest of the world is already fucked anyway, so what harm can he do?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    edited July 20

    Mahmood stays as Home Sec, sensible.

    Yes, I agree with that one but I suspect that quite a chunk of the Labour back benchers won't.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311
    DavidL said:

    So defence is a priority but so is cutting the cost of living. Guns and butter. I thought he was wanting to go back to the 1970s but it looks like he is going back a lot further.

    We'll go back to the 970s if we can't defend our country.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    MikeL said:

    Miliband Foreign Secretary

    He won't go down well with the Trump administration
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,324
    MikeL said:

    Miliband Foreign Secretary

    Oh, bugger. He's being moved from a role he had a real talent for, to one he doesn't have an obvious skill at.
  • Taz said:

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    Taxing our way to growth. Marvellous.
    I would far rather cut welfare, pensions and move healthcare to a mixed funding system, and free up the cash that way, but that's never going to happen.

    So if tax rises are the only way the nation stays safe and is protected then, as the lesser of two evils, then that's what we must do. They are the fairest, broadest and most reliable revenue raisers as well, and give some scope to iron out some of the ludicrous incentives elsewhere.

    As a Thatcherite aside, I'm increasingly coming to the view that privatising the roads is a good idea - just so they bloody well get maintained properly.
    Like our water system you mean?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    Mahmood stays as Home Secretary
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,989

    Miliband going to FO

    Telling Putin to FO? The Iranian mullahs? Trump? The Argies?

    Must have been desperate to get him away from the oil....
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639

    Mahmood stays as Home Sec, sensible.

    Genuine surprise to me.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 104,639
    Starmer will probably be furious in a year as Burnham has to ask Labour MPs to do things they don't like because the facts are bad, which Starmer also told them, and they swallow it.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    viewcode said:

    We are now up to 11 individuals who sat around the cabinet table of previous Prime Minister Keir Starmer who have been sacked or left the government now that Andy Burnham is in No 10.

    Indeed. Departures so far

    Darren Jones is out as chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy is out as Justice Secretary and Deputy PM
    Hilary Benn is out as Northern Ireland Secretary
    Jenny Chapman is out as international development minister
    Jo Stevens is out as Wales Secretary
    Liz Kendall is out as Technology Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds is out as paymaster general and Cabinet Office minister
    Peter Kyle is out as Business Secretary
    Rachel Reeves is out as Chancellor
    Richard Hermer is out as Attorney General
    Steve Reed is out as Housing Secretary
    Richard Hermer's departure is surely a great relief and the end of the ridiculous Chagos deal. Good riddence.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 28,085
    Hmmm, voluntary aided and catholic doesn’t sound very open to the riff raff.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 6,162
    kle4 said:

    Starmer will probably be furious in a year as Burnham has to ask Labour MPs to do things they don't like because the facts are bad, which Starmer also told them, and they swallow it.

    I suspect he will have left the Commons for a big job elsewhere by then
  • AramintaMoonbeamQCAramintaMoonbeamQC Posts: 4,227
    edited July 20
    DavidL said:



    Mahmood stays as Home Sec, sensible.

    Yes, I agree with that one but I suspect that quite a chunk of the Labour back benchers won't.
    Burnham is trying to save their seats, but they are too dumb to see it.

    Everyone on BlueSky is fuming about it, so that confirms it is the correct decision.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531

    I realise by the time I post this the announcement will probably have come out but Miliband to Foreign Sec and Mahmood stays as Home Sec?

    Yay!
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 3,873
    Taz said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I think British politics is finally about to stabilize.

    Burnham will win en election (probably in Spring) meaning he'll be PM for longer than anyone since Cameron. Farage is imploding. He won't lead REF at the election. As a result, Reform will fall apart amid much very entertaining recrimination and in-fighting.

    Conservatives are alive thanks to Kemi. When Labour eventually gets turfed out the Tories will take over...

    The two-party system survives... We endure!












    If we have a gilt strike in September, I'm the new Ragersarmus! 😂


    Quite a few people across the divide have suggested Farage won’t lead Reform.

    Conversely I think that may help them. On a micro level I know people, like my in-laws, who should be certs for Reform but won’t touch it because of him.

    Of course he will attract others. Would they stay ?
    Farage leaving would help Reform, seriously?

    You must be seeing something in Bob, Suella, Richard or Zia that I'm not seeing.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    'Louise Haigh, who has emerged as a key ally of Andy Burnham, has now been confirmed as first secretary of state and chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.'

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgrkv8e8l9qt
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 67,311

    Taz said:

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    Taxing our way to growth. Marvellous.
    I would far rather cut welfare, pensions and move healthcare to a mixed funding system, and free up the cash that way, but that's never going to happen.

    So if tax rises are the only way the nation stays safe and is protected then, as the lesser of two evils, then that's what we must do. They are the fairest, broadest and most reliable revenue raisers as well, and give some scope to iron out some of the ludicrous incentives elsewhere.

    As a Thatcherite aside, I'm increasingly coming to the view that privatising the roads is a good idea - just so they bloody well get maintained properly.
    Like our water system you mean?
    You may laugh, but water infrastructure is far better maintained today than it was under state control, and water quality is better.

    Maintenance spending is always the first thing to be cut and can-kicked in any nationalised asset because politicians and HMT always want it reallocated elsewhere.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531
    Odd that Cooper wasn't flagged as a sacking earlier...
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,324
    DavidL said:

    viewcode said:

    We are now up to 11 individuals who sat around the cabinet table of previous Prime Minister Keir Starmer who have been sacked or left the government now that Andy Burnham is in No 10.

    Indeed. Departures so far

    Darren Jones is out as chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    David Lammy is out as Justice Secretary and Deputy PM
    Hilary Benn is out as Northern Ireland Secretary
    Jenny Chapman is out as international development minister
    Jo Stevens is out as Wales Secretary
    Liz Kendall is out as Technology Secretary
    Nick Thomas-Symonds is out as paymaster general and Cabinet Office minister
    Peter Kyle is out as Business Secretary
    Rachel Reeves is out as Chancellor
    Richard Hermer is out as Attorney General
    Steve Reed is out as Housing Secretary
    Richard Hermer's departure is surely a great relief and the end of the ridiculous Chagos deal. Good riddence.
    One hopes, certainly
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 137,690
    tlg86 said:

    Hmmm, voluntary aided and catholic doesn’t sound very open to the riff raff.

    Catholics, especially in Merseyside, were traditionally from the poorest parts of the City
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,999
    viewcode said:

    MikeL said:

    Miliband Foreign Secretary

    Oh, bugger. He's being moved from a role he had a real talent for, to one he doesn't have an obvious skill at.
    viewcode said:

    MikeL said:

    Miliband Foreign Secretary

    Oh, bugger. He's being moved from a role he had a real talent for, to one he doesn't have an obvious skill at.
    MikeL said:

    Miliband Foreign Secretary

    Errr Syria anybody?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,727

    DougSeal said:

    Anyone predict the CoE? Anyone?

    John Healey

    (I am good at this prediction game.)
    You were right!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 57,602
    nico67 said:

    One thing we need to see the end of are those constant leaks in the run up to the budgets .

    Judging by the reshuffle, Burnhams team know how to keep quiet.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511

    Odd that Cooper wasn't flagged as a sacking earlier...

    Given she has walked down Downing Streer in front of the cameras is it job switch.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 92,511
    A 28-year-old man named as Joshua Kerry has been charged with the murder of Ann Widdecombe, the Crown Prosecution Service has said.
  • GarethoftheVale2GarethoftheVale2 Posts: 2,555
    Think Cooper is getting a new job rather than being sacked. justice?
  • eekeek Posts: 34,661
    Foxy said:

    nico67 said:

    One thing we need to see the end of are those constant leaks in the run up to the budgets .

    Judging by the reshuffle, Burnhams team know how to keep quiet.
    The question is - will the rest of the cabinet be given lessons on how to keep things quiet..
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 59,606
    edited July 20
    HYUFD said:

    'Louise Haigh, who has emerged as a key ally of Andy Burnham, has now been confirmed as first secretary of state and chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.'

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgrkv8e8l9qt

    So, we have a deputy PM who was a PC for fraud? It's innovative, you have to give him that.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 6,162

    Odd that Cooper wasn't flagged as a sacking earlier...

    Given she has walked down Downing Streer in front of the cameras is it job switch.
    I can't see her at Energy but she could get the Welfare job. McFadden switching to Energy
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 29,324

    Odd that Cooper wasn't flagged as a sacking earlier...

    Did Burnham not know where they were going to go when he invited them in? It feels like they negotiated instead of Burnham simply appointing them. It would explain Mahmood staying in post.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 28,085
    Lol, interesting timing on a piece of news that should be bumping the new PM off the top spot on the 22:00 news.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,685
    Quite a bit of learning by doing to be done by Supermanc's team
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,999
    HYUFD said:

    'Louise Haigh, who has emerged as a key ally of Andy Burnham, has now been confirmed as first secretary of state and chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.'

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgrkv8e8l9qt

    If I was the King I would watch the Duchy’s accounts more closely!
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,989

    Odd that Cooper wasn't flagged as a sacking earlier...

    Given she has walked down Downing Streer in front of the cameras is it job switch.
    She will have got a job she wanted. Long-term ally of Burnham.
  • TazTaz Posts: 29,791

    Taz said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I think British politics is finally about to stabilize.

    Burnham will win en election (probably in Spring) meaning he'll be PM for longer than anyone since Cameron. Farage is imploding. He won't lead REF at the election. As a result, Reform will fall apart amid much very entertaining recrimination and in-fighting.

    Conservatives are alive thanks to Kemi. When Labour eventually gets turfed out the Tories will take over...

    The two-party system survives... We endure!












    If we have a gilt strike in September, I'm the new Ragersarmus! 😂


    Quite a few people across the divide have suggested Farage won’t lead Reform.

    Conversely I think that may help them. On a micro level I know people, like my in-laws, who should be certs for Reform but won’t touch it because of him.

    Of course he will attract others. Would they stay ?
    Farage leaving would help Reform, seriously?

    You must be seeing something in Bob, Suella, Richard or Zia that I'm not seeing.
    I said ‘may’ not ‘will’

    He’s very marmite.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 29,486

    Taz said:

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.

    John Healey is COE

    Money for defence !!!
    From where exactly? There’s no magic money trees. 🙂

    Healey is a hopeless out of touch politician with zero communication skills.
    What Labour is doing to itself today is delicious.
    Casino's happy to make a contribution, I hear.
    I've argued consistently for a 2p increase in basic and top rate to fully fund defence, as you know.

    So less of that lip.
    Taxing our way to growth. Marvellous.
    I would far rather cut welfare, pensions and move healthcare to a mixed funding system, and free up the cash that way, but that's never going to happen.

    So if tax rises are the only way the nation stays safe and is protected then, as the lesser of two evils, then that's what we must do. They are the fairest, broadest and most reliable revenue raisers as well, and give some scope to iron out some of the ludicrous incentives elsewhere.

    As a Thatcherite aside, I'm increasingly coming to the view that privatising the roads is a good idea - just so they bloody well get maintained properly.
    Like our water system you mean?
    You may laugh, but water infrastructure is far better maintained today than it was under state control, and water quality is better.

    Maintenance spending is always the first thing to be cut and can-kicked in any nationalised asset because politicians and HMT always want it reallocated elsewhere.
    Absolutely!

    Nobody wants to go back to pre-privatisation waterways.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,685

    DavidL said:

    So defence is a priority but so is cutting the cost of living. Guns and butter. I thought he was wanting to go back to the 1970s but it looks like he is going back a lot further.

    We'll go back to the 970s if we can't defend our country.
    Anyone who remembers the 970s wasn't there

  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 29,486
    geoffw said:

    Quite a bit of learning by doing to be done by Supermanc's team

    Always better someone who can learn than someone who won't, which is what Starmer's team had become.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 37,531
    Lol BBC has just posted an entry in it's live feed

    Who is Ed Miliband?

    What are the chances of anyone who ins interested enough to follow that feed not know who Ed is?
Sign In or Register to comment.