Skip to content

Scots still want to remain in the Union but look set to re-elect the SNP – politicalbetting.com

13

Comments

  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,835

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Microsoft Copilot, via a consultancy, and - a lot.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 54,937

    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    16% of Yes voters now backing Reform is also potentially fatal for nats, especially given just 12% of No voters back the SNP.

    Scottish Reform voters are a weird bunch. 34% want to Rejoin the EU:

    https://bsky.app/profile/eumadesimple.bsky.social/post/3mdkbdxp4th2v

    I think they just want to be contrary.
    It deserves some investigation. Perhaps Reform is seen as a way to protest vote against the current SNP government, without voting for the longer-term opponents of the SNP in Scotland: Labour or the Tories?

    Particularly for those who are more social conservative supporters of independence, and therefore repelled by the Scottish Greens.
    It seems clear that the Reform vote is substantially a protest vote. One in the style of Marlon Brando in the Wild One (though without the smouldering cool).

    "Hey Johnnie, what are you rebelling against?"

    "What you got?"
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 57,188
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest thing since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 22,207

    It will be interesting to see whether crashing the housing market becomes a point of principle for Trump haters.

    https://x.com/ArmandDoma/status/2016945573262479741

    TRUMP: I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up

    Trump supporters skew old, and Trump opponents skew young, so naturally Trump opponents will already tend to favour lower asset prices and vice versa.

    Most people on PB.com have been in favour of lower house prices from well before Trump started using twitter to amplify birther conspiracies about Obama. It will have nothing to do with "Trump hate" if they continue to do so.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    A Plaid voting Englishman.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    A Plaid voting Englishman.
    LOL
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,203
    edited January 29
    Taz said:

    Fun fact.
    Sir Bill Cash, former MP and leading Brexiteer, is a distant cousin of Johnny Cash.

    He was also locked up under the roof in his house.

    It was on TV

    Cash in the Attic.

    Johnny Cash was on of the finest Columbo villains too.


    Parachuted in like an SKS blue Tory
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,854
    The Nation Nominates Minneapolis for the Nobel Peace Prize

    https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/the-nation-nominates-minneapolis-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/


    Can you imagine the response if they got it?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    It will be interesting to see whether crashing the housing market becomes a point of principle for Trump haters.

    https://x.com/ArmandDoma/status/2016945573262479741

    TRUMP: I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up

    I am more concerned that the silly barsteward has today in Georgia, with mad Tulsi, set the wheels in motion for overturning the 2020 President Election.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 5,693
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Perhaps it is an ironic demonstration of how to make £3.999 million with £10 of AI credits and an AWS / Cloudflare subscription?

    They didn't even pay for the content management (IPS Community Suite).

    [The front page is just puff pieces by the usual suspects.]
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Perhaps it is an ironic demonstration of how to make £3.999 million with £10 of AI credits and an AWS / Cloudflare subscription?

    They didn't even pay for the content management (IPS Community Suite).
    The government have been absolutely shook down by magic bean salesman, but in the scale of government shakedowns it is suprisingly small scale given this is supposedly the education platform to upskill 10 million people.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    The Nation Nominates Minneapolis for the Nobel Peace Prize

    https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/the-nation-nominates-minneapolis-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/


    Can you imagine the response if they got it?

    Presumably Tim Walz personally collects the medal.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 31,897
    Liz Truss ion the Daily T today, arguing that ICE etc face an "armed insurrection", even after the latest shootings.

    https://youtu.be/Z7inpZjjfoA?t=2485
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 60,254

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Perhaps it is an ironic demonstration of how to make £3.999 million with £10 of AI credits and an AWS / Cloudflare subscription?

    They didn't even pay for the content management (IPS Community Suite).
    The government have been absolutely shook down by magic bean salesman, but in the scale of government shakedowns it is suprisingly small scale given this is supposedly the education platform to upskill 10 million people.
    The pro grifter scales the grift to what he/she can walk away with. As opposed to being hunted down by fraud investigators.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 42,066

    The Nation Nominates Minneapolis for the Nobel Peace Prize

    https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/the-nation-nominates-minneapolis-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/


    Can you imagine the response if they got it?

    Presumably Tim Walz personally collects the medal.
    @jacobsoboroff.bsky.social‬

    Walz told me that when he spoke to Trump on the phone the president compared the immigration operations in Minneapolis to the military mission he ordered in Venezuela.

    https://bsky.app/profile/jacobsoboroff.bsky.social/post/3mdlqaal4vk2e
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Perhaps it is an ironic demonstration of how to make £3.999 million with £10 of AI credits and an AWS / Cloudflare subscription?

    They didn't even pay for the content management (IPS Community Suite).
    The government have been absolutely shook down by magic bean salesman, but in the scale of government shakedowns it is suprisingly small scale given this is supposedly the education platform to upskill 10 million people.
    The pro grifter scales the grift to what he/she can walk away with. As opposed to being hunted down by fraud investigators.
    I still reckon they could have got away with £40-50 mill, pitch being price of a cup of coffee for each person to be upskilled.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,427

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Perhaps it is an ironic demonstration of how to make £3.999 million with £10 of AI credits and an AWS / Cloudflare subscription?

    They didn't even pay for the content management (IPS Community Suite).
    The government have been absolutely shook down by magic bean salesman, but in the scale of government shakedowns it is suprisingly small scale given this is supposedly the education platform to upskill 10 million people.
    Looked at another way, how much are the public and private sectors currently quietly paying commercial providers for stuff similar to what's on the list when they could be getting the training for free? Four million pounds is only a thousand times four thousand pounds and there must be more underpowered organisations in the UK than that who can be shook down for more than that. We just don't see it because it's distributed in tiny packets.

    Used well, this could be the best £4 million the government has wasted. Probably won't be, though.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    No tech illiteracy has long been a problem and not just the elected officials. The whole system is stuck in the dark ages.
  • isamisam Posts: 43,451
    edited January 29

    isam said:

    kinabalu said:

    isam said:

    Nigelb said:

    So it seems that Alex Pretti was something of a violent street thug.

    In fact his behaviour was rather reminiscent of the Wath rioters.

    Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but the USA is a gun society and thankfully Yorkshire isn't.

    "Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but.."
    Why do the media have to pretend that every victim was an angel though? I am sure it turns more people towards the far right than telling the truth would. If the consensus had been that this guy was a provocative and aggressive armed protestor, but that is no reason for him to be shot dead once he had been disarmed, I can't see many people disagreeing, yet making him out to be a Kumbayah singing Greenham Common style peacenik only for the footage to be revealed is akin to the highbrow disinformation problem discussed in this article, linked by our old fav @AlastairMeeks

    Very very good and carefully written piece that I encourage people to read closely rather than immediately seizing on things they don’t like to score points.

    https://bsky.app/profile/benansell.bsky.social/post/3md5x7v77rc24
    Otoh when people are victims of an atrocity it's not a natural instinct to go looking for ways in which they hadn't lived an admirable life. Doing this usually indicates a desire to downplay the atrocity (because of support for the political cause responsible for it) by introducing the thought that it wasn't entirely unjustified.
    Your point would be fine if they had been a bit of a wrongun in a way that had absolutely nothing to do with their demise, and the fact they were a wrongun were used to dismiss their death. But the fellow who was killed last week was depicted as being an angel, when he was, if the video I have seen of him from the previous week is legitimate, quite a violent and angry, armed protestor. As I said, this doesn't mean it was right to kill him, especially as his firearm had been removed, but there is just no need to overegg the pudding. I think it treats the public as fools to do so, and in turn causes people to lose sympathy/distrust the authorities
    Well, yes, the point being that even rogues and ne'erdowells deserve the protection of the law ad shouldn't be gunned down unless they present an immediate threat to life.
    No, that isn’t the point.

    I accept what you say, but the point is that there is no need to pretend that everyone who is mistakenly or unjustly killed by the police or ICE or whoever is some kind of Saint. Rogues and Ne’erdowells deserve the full protection of the law and shouldn’t be gunned down, but that doesn’t mean you have to pretend that they weren’t Rogues and Ne’erdowells. If anything the fact they were those things but still shouldn’t have been killed makes the point; trying to pretend they weren’t is obliquely saying that rogues and ne’erdowells don’t deserve to the full protection of the law as much as Saints
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916
    Scott_xP said:

    The Nation Nominates Minneapolis for the Nobel Peace Prize

    https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/the-nation-nominates-minneapolis-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/


    Can you imagine the response if they got it?

    Presumably Tim Walz personally collects the medal.
    @jacobsoboroff.bsky.social‬

    Walz told me that when he spoke to Trump on the phone the president compared the immigration operations in Minneapolis to the military mission he ordered in Venezuela.

    https://bsky.app/profile/jacobsoboroff.bsky.social/post/3mdlqaal4vk2e
    There have been around fifty fewer fatalities than the Maduro snatch, so a way to go in Minnesota yet.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,854
    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 39,158
    According to this, Livingston and Sevenoaks would swtich from other parties to Reform UK as a result of 16 and 17 year olds being allowed to vote, which seems a bit unlikely.

    https://x.com/edhodgsoned/status/2016964423345111172
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 22,207

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    I spy with my little eye something beginning with "f".
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458
    edited January 29

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Green fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    My instant analysis of the current polls would suggest that a larger Holyrood majority for the SNP & Greens is on the cards - the SNP may well hold most of their constituency seats against a very split Unionist vote, while an increased vote for the Greens in the regional lists would give them gains there.

    Otherwise I would suggest that there would be some form of minority government, which seemed to be handled quite deftly by Salmond in 2007-2011 I believe, with Tory support.
    Quite likely to be a pro-Indy majority at Holyrood delivered by a minority pro-Indy vote.
    Not certain at all. The SNP voteshare at Holyrood on the new Yougov is lower than it has been at any election since 2007 and Reform are ahead of the Greens on the list vote as are Labour
    Those living in Scotland know far more about this than you do
    The polls for Holyrood read the same even on the Moon
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,427

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    Wasn't Boris an example of the benefits of 1:1 tuition in how to use IT?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458
    edited January 29

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,854

    It will be interesting to see whether crashing the housing market becomes a point of principle for Trump haters.

    https://x.com/ArmandDoma/status/2016945573262479741

    TRUMP: I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up

    I am more concerned that the silly barsteward has today in Georgia, with mad Tulsi, set the wheels in motion for overturning the 2020 President Election.
    More about rigging 2028 me thinks.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    The problem that Big Dom and Patrick Vallence agree on is that the civil service is STEM deficient. Clueless about AI, data science, i.e. all crucial aspects of running a modern productive economy.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 57,188

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    He's a lunatic who disgraces himself with comparisons like that.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 54,937
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Didn't he specifically rule out independence "in the first term" ? thereby clearly making it a long term objective with some ground work to be done first.

    A more honest approach than the SNP perhaps, but also in recognition that as it stands Wales is not yet ready for independence.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 69,169
    edited January 29
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    You do not live in Wales nor do you get Welsh news, or local Welsh news where May Senedd election is the topic of lots of discussions and Plaid popularity is wholly unaffected by the independence debate

    They will win irrespective of your opinion on this
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 36,916

    It will be interesting to see whether crashing the housing market becomes a point of principle for Trump haters.

    https://x.com/ArmandDoma/status/2016945573262479741

    TRUMP: I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up

    I am more concerned that the silly barsteward has today in Georgia, with mad Tulsi, set the wheels in motion for overturning the 2020 President Election.
    More about rigging 2028 me thinks.
    Oh it is definitely a recce to see if they can collect the boxes before the count next time.

    But don't you believe he will consider himself vindicated if he bins a handful of boxes from Dem wards. He needs to bin less than 12,000 votes.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 5,693
    edited January 29

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    Bottom of the page:
    This is a third party site, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) on behalf of the Innovate UK BridgeAI programme.

    You could be right that the delivery was just a framework, but surely someone along the way must have proposed actual material for this, otherwise what's the point?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 22,207
    isam said:

    isam said:

    kinabalu said:

    isam said:

    Nigelb said:

    So it seems that Alex Pretti was something of a violent street thug.

    In fact his behaviour was rather reminiscent of the Wath rioters.

    Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but the USA is a gun society and thankfully Yorkshire isn't.

    "Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but.."
    Why do the media have to pretend that every victim was an angel though? I am sure it turns more people towards the far right than telling the truth would. If the consensus had been that this guy was a provocative and aggressive armed protestor, but that is no reason for him to be shot dead once he had been disarmed, I can't see many people disagreeing, yet making him out to be a Kumbayah singing Greenham Common style peacenik only for the footage to be revealed is akin to the highbrow disinformation problem discussed in this article, linked by our old fav @AlastairMeeks

    Very very good and carefully written piece that I encourage people to read closely rather than immediately seizing on things they don’t like to score points.

    https://bsky.app/profile/benansell.bsky.social/post/3md5x7v77rc24
    Otoh when people are victims of an atrocity it's not a natural instinct to go looking for ways in which they hadn't lived an admirable life. Doing this usually indicates a desire to downplay the atrocity (because of support for the political cause responsible for it) by introducing the thought that it wasn't entirely unjustified.
    Your point would be fine if they had been a bit of a wrongun in a way that had absolutely nothing to do with their demise, and the fact they were a wrongun were used to dismiss their death. But the fellow who was killed last week was depicted as being an angel, when he was, if the video I have seen of him from the previous week is legitimate, quite a violent and angry, armed protestor. As I said, this doesn't mean it was right to kill him, especially as his firearm had been removed, but there is just no need to overegg the pudding. I think it treats the public as fools to do so, and in turn causes people to lose sympathy/distrust the authorities
    Well, yes, the point being that even rogues and ne'erdowells deserve the protection of the law ad shouldn't be gunned down unless they present an immediate threat to life.
    No, that isn’t the point.

    I accept what you say, but the point is that there is no need to pretend that everyone who is mistakenly or unjustly killed by the police or ICE or whoever is some kind of Saint. Rogues and Ne’erdowells deserve the full protection of the law and shouldn’t be gunned down, but that doesn’t mean you have to pretend that they weren’t Rogues and Ne’erdowells. If anything the fact they were those things but still shouldn’t have been killed makes the point; trying to pretend they weren’t is obliquely saying that rogues and ne’erdowells don’t deserve to the full protection of the law as much as Saints
    Indeed, I was agreeing with you.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,854

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    Bottom of the page:
    This is a third party site, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) on behalf of the Innovate UK BridgeAI programme.

    You could be right that the delivery was just a framework, but surely someone along the way must have proposed actual material for this, otherwise what's the point?
    If you need a government Skills Hub to find AI courses then you shouldn't be looking to work in AI is my brutal view of all this.

  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
    If Plaid win they can do what they decide to do in Wales best interest
  • Jim Wallace (Lord Wallace of Tankerness) has died, aged 71. He was the former MP for Orkney & Shetland, former Deputy First Minister of Scotland and a thoroughly decent bloke.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    You do not live in Wales nor do you get Welsh news, or local Welsh news where May Senedd election is the topic of lots of discussions and Plaid popularity is wholly unaffected by the independence debate

    They will win irrespective of your opinion on this
    Yes it is. Look at the data, from May 2024 to March 2025 Plaid polled from 18 to 24%.

    The Plaid leader ruled out an independence referendum in Spring 2025 and since then some polls have had Plaid reaching 30%+ as a direct result
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 5,693

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    Bottom of the page:
    This is a third party site, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) on behalf of the Innovate UK BridgeAI programme.

    You could be right that the delivery was just a framework, but surely someone along the way must have proposed actual material for this, otherwise what's the point?
    If you need a government Skills Hub to find AI courses then you shouldn't be looking to work in AI is my brutal view of all this.

    No doubt.

    Though I could see some value in explaining what AI does, what it should be used for, and what it shouldn't be used for.

    Perhaps the people who most need this are based in Westminster.
  • TresTres Posts: 3,444

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    He's a lunatic who disgraces himself with comparisons like that.
    you quite comfortable with the treatment of woman and children in the ice camps are you mr glenn?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 54,937

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    Wasn't Boris an example of the benefits of 1:1 tuition in how to use IT?
    He certainly knew how to plug in his dongle.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,849
    edited January 29

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    It's not that the post is 'right' or 'wrong' - what it clearly is is massively inflammatory. It will contribute to the conflict it predicts.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
    If Plaid win they can do what they decide to do in Wales best interest
    On devolved matters only
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458
    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 5,693
    Foxy said:

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    Wasn't Boris an example of the benefits of 1:1 tuition in how to use IT?
    He certainly knew how to plug in his dongle.
    And transfer data in 1.5Gb chunks.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
    If Plaid win they can do what they decide to do in Wales best interest
    On devolved matters only
    Why do you deny democracy and self determination

  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    You do not live in Wales nor do you get Welsh news, or local Welsh news where May Senedd election is the topic of lots of discussions and Plaid popularity is wholly unaffected by the independence debate

    They will win irrespective of your opinion on this
    Yes it is. Look at the data, from May 2024 to March 2025 Plaid polled from 18 to 24%.

    The Plaid leader ruled out an independence referendum in Spring 2025 and since then some polls have had Plaid reaching 30%+ as a direct result
    It has nothing to do with independence and that is my final word on the subject
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 12,483

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
    If Plaid win they can do what they decide to do in Wales best interest
    On devolved matters only
    Why do you deny democracy and self determination

    Democracy and self-determination are not mutually consistent to be picky.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458
    edited January 29

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in October last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since November last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Have you not heard of a U turn?
    You can't U turn on something not in your manifesto, the UK government would refuse Plaid a Welsh independence referendum regardless of course but if you didn't even win with it as a manifesto commitment you couldn't even ask for one anyway
    If Plaid win they can do what they decide to do in Wales best interest
    On devolved matters only
    Why do you deny democracy and self determination

    The future of the Union is constitutionally and legally a matter for Westminster and the UK government alone, as the UK Supreme Court confirmed
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,849
    HYUFD said:

    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20

    Daft.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    You do not live in Wales nor do you get Welsh news, or local Welsh news where May Senedd election is the topic of lots of discussions and Plaid popularity is wholly unaffected by the independence debate

    They will win irrespective of your opinion on this
    Yes it is. Look at the data, from May 2024 to March 2025 Plaid polled from 18 to 24%.

    The Plaid leader ruled out an independence referendum in Spring 2025 and since then some polls have had Plaid reaching 30%+ as a direct result
    It has nothing to do with independence and that is my final word on the subject
    It does, Plaid only took the lead in Senedd polls after ruling out pushing for independence
  • Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Didn't he specifically rule out independence "in the first term" ? thereby clearly making it a long term objective with some ground work to be done first.

    A more honest approach than the SNP perhaps, but also in recognition that as it stands Wales is not yet ready for independence.
    Yes he did but that is not the reason for Plaid popularity no matter how much @HYUFD tries to make the case

    It is the utter disillusionment with labour and Plaid are seen as best for Wales

    It is of course true that independence is not seen as viable and ruling it out is irrelevant because virtually nobody sees it happening soon anyway
  • Foxy said:

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    Wasn't Boris an example of the benefits of 1:1 tuition in how to use IT?
    He certainly knew how to plug in his dongle.
    And transfer data in 1.5Gb chunks.
    Those flies would be compressed and would need unzipping presumably.

    Sorry, files not flies.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 10,627
    HYUFD said:

    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20

    Silly. It was clearly just a clumsy attempt at satire. And, anyway, this is the outfit whose followers tirelessly throw around insults like 'Trump derangement syndrome' and 'Brexit derangement syndrome' thus proclaiming that anyone who questions their world view is mentally unstable. Nigel needs to lighten up.
  • HYUFD said:

    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20

    How many threats is that now

    See Manchester Police have rejected their complaint over the labour advert
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 133,458

    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    DavidL said:

    I can easily see a situation where the SNP and Greens fall slightly short of a majority but the Unionists cannot form a government because at least some parties will not work with Reform making a Unionist majority impossible too.

    Lord knows what happens then but it is unlikely to be any less of a shambles that the current government who live in stasis. In 2025 the Scottish Parliament managed to pass a grand total of 15 Acts of Parliament including such radical provisions as the Welfare of Dogs Act and the Scottish Languages Act, the former allowing a code of conduct for the acquisition of dogs and the latter support for Gaelic which already exists. Who could doubt this institution takes seriously the problems of Scotland? Well, anyone who looks even briefly into what they actually do, really.

    Edit, for those who want the whole exciting list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Scottish_Parliament_from_2025

    Fine, Swinney remains FM but completely neutered with no majority for indyref2 at Holyrood and has to focus on Scottish domestic policy like he is paid to!
    Your obsession over independence is silly

    It is the SNP obsession not mine
    Yes as I recall you are more Plaid Cymru obsessed. You've sold it to me. Come the referendum it is independence all the way. Free Wales!
    Plaid have ruled out pushing for independence for their first term if they win in May, unlike the SNP
    Steven Flynn was on the wireless yesterday as excited about Welsh Independence from

    the wicked Starmer as he was for Scotland.
    Well of course he was he is anti Union but the only reason Plaid are leading the polls is they have ruled out independence if they win
    Rubbish again from an Englishman on Welsh politics

    Plaid will win irrespective, because the Welsh want a government that will put Wales first and take on Westminster
    No, it was in mid last year that Plaid leader ap Iorweth ruled out independence.

    Until then most Senedd polls had Reform or Labour ahead, only since late last year have Plaid been ahead in most Senedd polls
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2026_Senedd_election
    Didn't he specifically rule out independence "in the first term" ? thereby clearly making it a long term objective with some ground work to be done first.

    A more honest approach than the SNP perhaps, but also in recognition that as it stands Wales is not yet ready for independence.
    Yes he did but that is not the reason for Plaid popularity no matter how much @HYUFD tries to make the case

    It is the utter disillusionment with labour and Plaid are seen as best for Wales

    It is of course true that independence is not seen as viable and ruling it out is irrelevant because virtually nobody sees it happening soon anyway
    No, there was disillusion with Labour in late 2024 but Plaid still did not poll 30%+ like now
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 60,254
    isam said:

    isam said:

    kinabalu said:

    isam said:

    Nigelb said:

    So it seems that Alex Pretti was something of a violent street thug.

    In fact his behaviour was rather reminiscent of the Wath rioters.

    Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but the USA is a gun society and thankfully Yorkshire isn't.

    "Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but.."
    Why do the media have to pretend that every victim was an angel though? I am sure it turns more people towards the far right than telling the truth would. If the consensus had been that this guy was a provocative and aggressive armed protestor, but that is no reason for him to be shot dead once he had been disarmed, I can't see many people disagreeing, yet making him out to be a Kumbayah singing Greenham Common style peacenik only for the footage to be revealed is akin to the highbrow disinformation problem discussed in this article, linked by our old fav @AlastairMeeks

    Very very good and carefully written piece that I encourage people to read closely rather than immediately seizing on things they don’t like to score points.

    https://bsky.app/profile/benansell.bsky.social/post/3md5x7v77rc24
    Otoh when people are victims of an atrocity it's not a natural instinct to go looking for ways in which they hadn't lived an admirable life. Doing this usually indicates a desire to downplay the atrocity (because of support for the political cause responsible for it) by introducing the thought that it wasn't entirely unjustified.
    Your point would be fine if they had been a bit of a wrongun in a way that had absolutely nothing to do with their demise, and the fact they were a wrongun were used to dismiss their death. But the fellow who was killed last week was depicted as being an angel, when he was, if the video I have seen of him from the previous week is legitimate, quite a violent and angry, armed protestor. As I said, this doesn't mean it was right to kill him, especially as his firearm had been removed, but there is just no need to overegg the pudding. I think it treats the public as fools to do so, and in turn causes people to lose sympathy/distrust the authorities
    Well, yes, the point being that even rogues and ne'erdowells deserve the protection of the law ad shouldn't be gunned down unless they present an immediate threat to life.
    No, that isn’t the point.

    I accept what you say, but the point is that there is no need to pretend that everyone who is mistakenly or unjustly killed by the police or ICE or whoever is some kind of Saint. Rogues and Ne’erdowells deserve the full protection of the law and shouldn’t be gunned down, but that doesn’t mean you have to pretend that they weren’t Rogues and Ne’erdowells. If anything the fact they were those things but still shouldn’t have been killed makes the point; trying to pretend they weren’t is obliquely saying that rogues and ne’erdowells don’t deserve to the full protection of the law as much as Saints
    Nearly all corrupt police practises target the “wrong ‘uns”

    A favourite in the U.K. was arresting a criminal for a genuine offence then getting him to admit to all the unsolved cases that were vaguely similar.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,697
    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?
  • DoctorGDoctorG Posts: 431
    Omnium said:

    DoctorG said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @LBCNews

    Former Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Lord Jim Wallace, who served as Scotland's first-ever deputy first minister, has died as a result of complications after surgery, his family has said.

    Sad news

    That means the leaders of Labour, the SNP, Lib Dem and Tories from the 1999 Scottish election have all passed away
    You could almost think it was a long time ago.
    It is, but if they were all alive today only one of them would be over 75
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 10,627
    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    I've been there a few times but some time ago. You probably can't go wrong with the bit with all the ancient beer halls in it.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 12,483
    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    I was there quite recently - I'd think you are fine wherever you stay. There's a slightly edgy wedge from the old town out towards the station and edged by the university area, but it's absolutely fine anyway.

    In the Residence there is this most magnificent vaulted room with statues along its walls. Really one of the great things to see anywhere.

  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 57,531

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    He's a lunatic who disgraces himself with comparisons like that.
    Trump's a lunatic? I agree, heartily.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,854

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    Bottom of the page:
    This is a third party site, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) on behalf of the Innovate UK BridgeAI programme.

    You could be right that the delivery was just a framework, but surely someone along the way must have proposed actual material for this, otherwise what's the point?
    If you need a government Skills Hub to find AI courses then you shouldn't be looking to work in AI is my brutal view of all this.

    No doubt.

    Though I could see some value in explaining what AI does, what it should be used for, and what it shouldn't be used for.

    Perhaps the people who most need this are based in Westminster.
    Honestly it sounds like The Thick of It.

    "We need an AI policy for this press release."

    "How about a skills hub. You can't go wrong with a skills hub. We set up loads at my last department when had no other ideas."

    "Yeh, brilliant. We can also throw in a Pathfinder Initiative for good measure."
  • Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 89,627

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at "only" £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    Capita (or similar) will have got the main contract for it. They will then have sub-contracted to Cognizant (or similar) to do the main bit of the work. But they will likely have also sub-contracted to a number of smaller consultancy firms you've never heard of to get the people to do the work. A lot of people will have sat around getting paid while they waited for various stages of onboarding to happen, before being able to do any work, and the work done will have concentrated on building the framework for the website, but not the content - the idea being to deliver something to the department that the department could keep updated, because something like this is always going to need to be updated.

    However, the department likely won't have thought about who was going to populate it and maintain it on an ongoing basis - that's opex and not capex - and the department likely doesn't have the knowledge to update a Skills Hub for AI anyway. So when they had the site delivered to them, populated by a bunch of placeholder "courses" to show that the site worked, I guess they simply published it, because who was going to have the domain knowledge to put useful stuff into it?

    The minister asked for a Skills Hub for AI, and the department delivered a Skills Hub for AI, but the civil service is such a diminished organisation - not allowed to pay the salaries to employ people who know what they're doing, demoralised from the abuse they receive from every quarter, encouraged to outsource at every turn, rather than build institutional knowledge and capability - that what was delivered was a potemkin skills hub for AI, and I guess that this will kick off another round of abuse towards the civil service, reducing the prospect of a similar outcome being avoided in the future.
    Bottom of the page:
    This is a third party site, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) on behalf of the Innovate UK BridgeAI programme.

    You could be right that the delivery was just a framework, but surely someone along the way must have proposed actual material for this, otherwise what's the point?
    If you need a government Skills Hub to find AI courses then you shouldn't be looking to work in AI is my brutal view of all this.

    No doubt.

    Though I could see some value in explaining what AI does, what it should be used for, and what it shouldn't be used for.

    Perhaps the people who most need this are based in Westminster.
    Honestly it sounds like The Thick of It.

    "We need an AI policy for this press release."

    "How about a skills hub. You can't go wrong with a skills hub. We set up loads at my last department when had no other ideas."

    "Yeh, brilliant. We can also throw in a Pathfinder Initiative for good measure."
    I call app Britain....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei9iM_zzzQk
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 5,693
    edited January 29

    Foxy said:

    "I took a closer look at the UK government's new 'AI Skills Hub', and it is insane. It includes 'courses' that are simply links to info pages about PhD programs; 'courses' that are literally just software developer documentation; and 'courses' that don't exist at all."

    https://x.com/ednewtonrex/status/2016881752690618735?s=20

    The government have been totally had.

    Jeez.

    That's not a Skills Hub for AI. That's a Skills Hub made by AI.

    Who did this and how much did they charge?
    Its been reported at only £4 million. I I was a journalist I might do so digging to see if that was the extent of it and who actually did the work and who signed it off.
    They trailed it as the greatest things since the Open University...

    https://x.com/SciTechgovuk/status/2016406230202277922
    Because we are led by tech illiterate morons.
    Only since July 2024.

    I am sure a tousle haired former PM could navigate his way around Only Fans with an impressive dexterity.
    Wasn't Boris an example of the benefits of 1:1 tuition in how to use IT?
    He certainly knew how to plug in his dongle.
    And transfer data in 1.5Gb chunks.
    Those flies would be compressed and would need unzipping presumably.

    Sorry, files not flies.
    I believe the chunks are usually in haploid format.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,866
    So the Trump administration will fabricate evidence to suggest Fulton County can’t be trusted with elections . Trump will put in a bunch of stooges to oversee the county and steal the mid-terms or just sow enough doubt with the urban voters to suppress turnout .

    Democracy in the USA is tragically disappearing.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 57,531

    Timothy Snyder
    @TimothyDSnyder
    ·
    6m
    Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.

    https://x.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/2016992083685392840


    Hope to God he is wrong.

    It's not that the post is 'right' or 'wrong' - what it clearly is is massively inflammatory. It will contribute to the conflict it predicts.
    Donald Trump should stop killing his own people.
  • isamisam Posts: 43,451
    edited January 29

    isam said:

    isam said:

    kinabalu said:

    isam said:

    Nigelb said:

    So it seems that Alex Pretti was something of a violent street thug.

    In fact his behaviour was rather reminiscent of the Wath rioters.

    Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but the USA is a gun society and thankfully Yorkshire isn't.

    "Now that doesn't mean he should have been killed but.."
    Why do the media have to pretend that every victim was an angel though? I am sure it turns more people towards the far right than telling the truth would. If the consensus had been that this guy was a provocative and aggressive armed protestor, but that is no reason for him to be shot dead once he had been disarmed, I can't see many people disagreeing, yet making him out to be a Kumbayah singing Greenham Common style peacenik only for the footage to be revealed is akin to the highbrow disinformation problem discussed in this article, linked by our old fav @AlastairMeeks

    Very very good and carefully written piece that I encourage people to read closely rather than immediately seizing on things they don’t like to score points.

    https://bsky.app/profile/benansell.bsky.social/post/3md5x7v77rc24
    Otoh when people are victims of an atrocity it's not a natural instinct to go looking for ways in which they hadn't lived an admirable life. Doing this usually indicates a desire to downplay the atrocity (because of support for the political cause responsible for it) by introducing the thought that it wasn't entirely unjustified.
    Your point would be fine if they had been a bit of a wrongun in a way that had absolutely nothing to do with their demise, and the fact they were a wrongun were used to dismiss their death. But the fellow who was killed last week was depicted as being an angel, when he was, if the video I have seen of him from the previous week is legitimate, quite a violent and angry, armed protestor. As I said, this doesn't mean it was right to kill him, especially as his firearm had been removed, but there is just no need to overegg the pudding. I think it treats the public as fools to do so, and in turn causes people to lose sympathy/distrust the authorities
    Well, yes, the point being that even rogues and ne'erdowells deserve the protection of the law ad shouldn't be gunned down unless they present an immediate threat to life.
    No, that isn’t the point.

    I accept what you say, but the point is that there is no need to pretend that everyone who is mistakenly or unjustly killed by the police or ICE or whoever is some kind of Saint. Rogues and Ne’erdowells deserve the full protection of the law and shouldn’t be gunned down, but that doesn’t mean you have to pretend that they weren’t Rogues and Ne’erdowells. If anything the fact they were those things but still shouldn’t have been killed makes the point; trying to pretend they weren’t is obliquely saying that rogues and ne’erdowells don’t deserve to the full protection of the law as much as Saints
    Indeed, I was agreeing with you.
    I am sorry. I’m not sure how I misunderstood that
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 39,158
    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    I've always wanted to visit Munich but never got round to it. Hope you have a good trip.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,697

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 18,931
    #competition

    1. Number of net gains (or losses -ve) for the Dems in the House? 11 Dem Gains
    2. Number of net gains (or losses -ve) for the Dems in the Senate? 3 Dem Gains
    3. Number of MSPs won by the SNP at the Holyrood election? 62
    4. Number of AMs won by Plaid Cymru at the Senedd election? 29
    5. UK Party recording the largest poll lead during 2026 and by what percentage (British Polling Council registered pollsters only)? 16% Lead for Reform
    6. Labour’s Projected National Share of the vote based on the 2026 local elections according to the BBC? 23%
    7. Number of Reform MPs on the 31st December 2026? 11
    8. The name of the UK Prime Minister on 31st December 2026? Keir Starmer
    9. Will Andy Burnham will be an MP on 31st December 2026? No
    10. UK borrowing in the financial year to November 2026 (£132.3bn to November 2025)? £120 billion
    11. UK GDP growth in the 12 months to October 2026 (1.1% to October 2025)? 1.3%
    12. Winners of the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup? Spain
  • LeonLeon Posts: 66,284
    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

  • FF43FF43 Posts: 18,931

    HYUFD said:

    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20

    Silly. It was clearly just a clumsy attempt at satire. And, anyway, this is the outfit whose followers tirelessly throw around insults like 'Trump derangement syndrome' and 'Brexit derangement syndrome' thus proclaiming that anyone who questions their world view is mentally unstable. Nigel needs to lighten up.
    I don't think it was satire.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,427
    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    'Reform UK has threatened to sue Kemi Badenoch unless she publicly apologises to Suella Braverman by 4pm tomorrow over the Tories’ now-retracted mental health reference'


    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2016911722250911823?s=20

    Silly. It was clearly just a clumsy attempt at satire. And, anyway, this is the outfit whose followers tirelessly throw around insults like 'Trump derangement syndrome' and 'Brexit derangement syndrome' thus proclaiming that anyone who questions their world view is mentally unstable. Nigel needs to lighten up.
    The combination of being rude yet thin skinned is not a good one for the snowflakes of Reform.

    I thought they regard hurty words as a bit of banter.
    Playground bullies are well known for not liking it up 'em.

    Can't think where I got the playground bully metaphor from.

    (Could be worse, my go-to line in this scenario is the one from St Thomas Moore; the proud spirit cannot endure to be mocked.)
  • Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

    We took our family to Dachau when they were relatively young and it left an indeliable mark on them

    No concentration camp can be described as a let down

    They are not tourist attractions
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 39,158
    Does anyone know why the French page on GridWatch has seemingly stopped being updated?

    https://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/france/
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 18,396

    Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

    We took our family to Dachau when they were relatively young and it left an indeliable mark on them

    No concentration camp can be described as a let down

    They are not tourist attractions
    Ignore him, Big G. He’s just being an edgelord.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 42,066
    @kaitlancollins

    For the second time today, Trump declines to take any questions from reporters. Hard to think of a moment in the Trump presidency when that’s happened before.
  • Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Yeah, probably best to return the car as soon as you get to the city. The only caveat for me would be if you want to visit Dachau, as that is easier to get to by car.

    What time of year are you going ? In the warmer months it's quite cool metaphorically and literally to swim in the river that flows through the English garden, once the current slows a bit below the eiswelle.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,992
    MattW said:

    Liz Truss ion the Daily T today, arguing that ICE etc face an "armed insurrection", even after the latest shootings.

    https://youtu.be/Z7inpZjjfoA?t=2485

    We basically somehow ended up with David Icke as prime minister for two months didn't we? How the hell did we manage that?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 100,816
    Scott_xP said:

    @kaitlancollins

    For the second time today, Trump declines to take any questions from reporters. Hard to think of a moment in the Trump presidency when that’s happened before.

    That does seem pretty unusual, I thought he generally loved questions, since no matter how hostile he's confident bluster always sees him through and he knows how to play to his audience very well.
  • Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

    Which one's your favourite, m9* ? I like Sachsenhausen, the OG. When I say "like", I mean I went on a bitterly cold grey day in December with the wind sweeping in all the way from the Steppes, and it was the bleakest thing I have ever done and it left a stronger impression on me than any film or book, or any of the museums.

    *m9 is like m8 but one better.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 15,131

    viewcode said:

    FPT

    Not interested in party politics at the moment. More needs to be shaken out.

    Big News! At yesterday's earnings call Tesla announced their plans to stop building cars. Model S and X and Cybertruck are all dead with their production lines repurposed for robots and taxis. No further cars will be built which you can drive. So once the Model 3 and Y get old, that's the end.

    Madness standing on the shoulders of madness on stilts. Oh, the Robototron production line is to build 1m units next year. As there is no global market for these, expect them to be bought by the US government and used for herd culling of the population.

    Is that a true-truth? I'm not a big fan of Elon (I know: surprise!) but even by his standard this is f*****g stupid. Tesla is a hundred-billion dollar company. Are the board so in thrall to Elon that they are willing to destroy the company for one man's stupidity?

    1. Model S and X production ends shortly. Sales are down to a trickle anyway. Production space at the Fremont factory to be repurposed to build Optimus
    2. Cybertruck production line to be repurposed to build autonomous vehicles. No timeline given or what those are but it won't be the truck that nobody buys
    3. Roadster announced with a reveal in April. Its been announced as launching this year every year since 2020
    4. Elon said that with the exception of the roadster, Tesla will not bring to the market any vehicles which are not fully autonomous
    5. They further project that the bulk of all future sales will be the cybercab

    He/they are mad. Sales are in Year on Year on Year decline. Accelerating hard. Sales of tax credits down nearly 50% YonY. They need profitable sales (vehicles are 75% of revenue to pay for capex and research. Capex this year more than doubles to $20bn. Hasn't said what they're spending it on. Won't be cars.

    So no new models ever again. Its done.
    Still, if the roadster ever does happen ima gettit. Performance that breaks either the laws of physics or the laws of the UK sounds good to me. 0-60 in one second is something I require.
    You, TSE and Dura round Silverstone. I hope Betfair offer odds!
    We could do it in iRacing. I will back myself at any odds.

    I can do a 1:59 around it in a 992 GT3 R. It's a front end grip track so I can probably get another 1s with better setup and then maybe another 1s with practice.
  • Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Yeah, probably best to return the car as soon as you get to the city. The only caveat for me would be if you want to visit Dachau, as that is easier to get to by car.

    What time of year are you going ? In the warmer months it's quite cool metaphorically and literally to swim in the river that flows through the English garden, once the current slows a bit below the eiswelle.
    FWIW, I found it very time-consuming boarding a flight from Munich Airport - lots of walking from place to place, endless queues, and not being in the EU didn't help. Got there three hours before the flight, and we were so constantly busy with one thing or another (first search, second scan, emigration, check-in, luggage drop-off etc) that we weren't able to get breakfast. It may have been an off day, of course (I am not a particularly experienced traveller) but I would recommend leaving enough time to get out of the place.
  • DoctorGDoctorG Posts: 431
    kle4 said:


    Scott_xP said:

    @kaitlancollins

    For the second time today, Trump declines to take any questions from reporters. Hard to think of a moment in the Trump presidency when that’s happened before.

    That does seem pretty unusual, I thought he generally loved questions, since no matter how hostile he's confident bluster always sees him through and he knows how to play to his audience very well.
    He will be away playing golf
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 60,254

    Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

    We took our family to Dachau when they were relatively young and it left an indeliable mark on them

    No concentration camp can be described as a let down

    They are not tourist attractions
    Ignore him, Big G. He’s just being an edgelord.
    Incorrect. He is trying to be an edgelord

    Actually, he is Biff.
  • Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Yeah, probably best to return the car as soon as you get to the city. The only caveat for me would be if you want to visit Dachau, as that is easier to get to by car.

    What time of year are you going ? In the warmer months it's quite cool metaphorically and literally to swim in the river that flows through the English garden, once the current slows a bit below the eiswelle.
    FWIW, I found it very time-consuming boarding a flight from Munich Airport - lots of walking from place to place, endless queues, and not being in the EU didn't help. Got there three hours before the flight, and we were so constantly busy with one thing or another (first search, second scan, emigration, check-in, luggage drop-off etc) that we weren't able to get breakfast. It may have been an off day, of course (I am not a particularly experienced traveller) but I would recommend leaving enough time to get out of the place.
    It's a surprisingly large airport. The car rental return operation, all cars for all firms funneled into the one dropoff zone, is intimidating but very quick.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 39,158
    "Labour attacks Green party drugs policy in Gorton and Denton byelection
    Online ads target Zack Polanski’s drugs stance as Labour aims to sideline Greens and consolidate anti-Reform vote"

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jan/28/labour-attacks-green-party-drugs-policy-gorton-and-denton-byelection
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,427
    Pro_Rata said:

    MattW said:

    Liz Truss ion the Daily T today, arguing that ICE etc face an "armed insurrection", even after the latest shootings.

    https://youtu.be/Z7inpZjjfoA?t=2485

    We basically somehow ended up with David Icke as prime minister for two months didn't we? How the hell did we manage that?
    We were in mourning for the Queen for one chunk of it, and then there was the conference recess for another chunk of it.

    Elizabeth T took over on September 6
    Elizabeth R died on September 8
    The funeral was on September 19
    Kwarteng's mini budget was on September 23
    The party conference recess was from September 23 to October 11
    Kwateng was sacked on October 14
    Hunt's antibudget was on October 17
    Truss announced her resgination on October 20
    Sunak took over on October 24

    In terms of actual Westminster time, that's about three weeks?
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 15,131
    edited January 29

    viewcode said:

    FPT

    Not interested in party politics at the moment. More needs to be shaken out.

    Big News! At yesterday's earnings call Tesla announced their plans to stop building cars. Model S and X and Cybertruck are all dead with their production lines repurposed for robots and taxis. No further cars will be built which you can drive. So once the Model 3 and Y get old, that's the end.

    Madness standing on the shoulders of madness on stilts. Oh, the Robototron production line is to build 1m units next year. As there is no global market for these, expect them to be bought by the US government and used for herd culling of the population.

    Is that a true-truth? I'm not a big fan of Elon (I know: surprise!) but even by his standard this is f*****g stupid. Tesla is a hundred-billion dollar company. Are the board so in thrall to Elon that they are willing to destroy the company for one man's stupidity?

    1. Model S and X production ends shortly. Sales are down to a trickle anyway. Production space at the Fremont factory to be repurposed to build Optimus
    2. Cybertruck production line to be repurposed to build autonomous vehicles. No timeline given or what those are but it won't be the truck that nobody buys
    3. Roadster announced with a reveal in April. Its been announced as launching this year every year since 2020
    4. Elon said that with the exception of the roadster, Tesla will not bring to the market any vehicles which are not fully autonomous
    5. They further project that the bulk of all future sales will be the cybercab

    He/they are mad. Sales are in Year on Year on Year decline. Accelerating hard. Sales of tax credits down nearly 50% YonY. They need profitable sales (vehicles are 75% of revenue to pay for capex and research. Capex this year more than doubles to $20bn. Hasn't said what they're spending it on. Won't be cars.

    So no new models ever again. Its done.
    Still, if the roadster ever does happen ima gettit. Performance that breaks either the laws of physics or the laws of the UK sounds good to me. 0-60 in one second is something I require.
    Why don't you just buy a Taycan Turbo GT today? That will do a sub 2s 0-60 and actually exists.

    I can see the logic of this for Tesla. One aspect of the car industry they have never embraced, whether by intent or lack of ability, is continuous and iterative product improvement. We have had three generations of 5 Series in the lifespan of the Model S and all they did with that was change the door handles. The product line up got very stale and the new offerings from the legacy OEMS (Neue Klasse iX3, etc.) look to have them beat in every possible way. Tesla, as far as I can tell, aren't bound by the norms of corporate finance because people like betting on Musk so they might as well move on to the New New Thing. AI/Robotics might be something eventually I suppose. I asked Co-pilot in Excel to change all red on black text to white on black and it asked me where this text was (it was in the fucking spreadsheet from whence I summoned Co-pilot) and then gave me a load of VB Code which I was presumably supposed to print out and stick up my arse.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,427

    Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    pb brains trust: Anyone know Munich? Anyone ha e any views what area of the city I might be best advised to stay in with the family, balancing niceness/cost/proximity to things to see?

    My daughter lived there for a year recently. They were due north of the old town, just outside the inner ring road. Walking distance to englischer garten. Nice area, just lively enough and lots of good bars and places to eat as close to university. Are you arriving into Munich airport and then picking up a car ?
    Thanks - yes, that's the plan. We're going to spend a week in Austria but then a couple of days in Munich at the end (probably will return the car and do Munich by public transport).
    Don’t bother with Dachau. Total letdown. No gas chambers, not even a torture cell

    Just a pathetic rip off of Auschwitz, basically. Like one of those Winter Wonderlands with a plastic Santa and 3 mangy reindeer

    We took our family to Dachau when they were relatively young and it left an indeliable mark on them

    No concentration camp can be described as a let down

    They are not tourist attractions
    Ignore him, Big G. He’s just being an edgelord.
    Incorrect. He is trying to be an edgelord

    Actually, he is Biff.
    He's certainly a (U)Kipper.

    There's one for the parents of primary school children.
  • Pro_Rata said:

    MattW said:

    Liz Truss ion the Daily T today, arguing that ICE etc face an "armed insurrection", even after the latest shootings.

    https://youtu.be/Z7inpZjjfoA?t=2485

    We basically somehow ended up with David Icke as prime minister for two months didn't we? How the hell did we manage that?
    We were in mourning for the Queen for one chunk of it, and then there was the conference recess for another chunk of it.

    Elizabeth T took over on September 6
    Elizabeth R died on September 8
    The funeral was on September 19
    Kwarteng's mini budget was on September 23
    The party conference recess was from September 23 to October 11
    Kwateng was sacked on October 14
    Hunt's antibudget was on October 17
    Truss announced her resgination on October 20
    Sunak took over on October 24

    In terms of actual Westminster time, that's about three weeks?
    Put like that, the striking thing is that she had both the attention of, and a grip on, the nation for just 4 days.
Sign In or Register to comment.