Skip to content
Options

Monty Python cannot compete with Corbyn and Sultana – politicalbetting.com

123457»

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,932

    NEW THREAD

  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,749

    What fresh hell is this:

    Zia Yusuf

    @ZiaYusufUK

    We will have thousands of pages of legislation oven-ready for when
    @Nigel_Farage becomes PM.

    At least the manifesto will be very detailed… right?
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,321
    Corbyn's new party reminds me of The Cloggies meeting The Blagdon Amateur Rapist's new dance team.

    Stan. Look 'ere you bloody perverts.

    Reg Thrumper alias The Blagdon AR. Thanks Stan, we've been trying to think up a name all day.
  • TazTaz Posts: 19,905
    SandraMc said:

    Taz said:

    Cicero said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    I’m watching Children of Men for the first time. Wanted something cheerful and uplifting. Hear it’s a blast

    Written by the same person who wrote endless twee middle class murder mysteries/love triangles/Detective stories which were an ITV staple all through the nineties, for goodness sake !
    I wouldn´t call P D James "twee", though her early books did get a bit formulaic at times. The books are, I think, better than the telly.

    There is a run of her novels, starting with a Shroud for a Nightingale that put her in the front rank of detective fiction.
    Ah, my error. I thought it Ruth Rendell.
    I wouldn't describe the work of either Ruth Rendell or P.D. James as twee, although some of their novels are not as good as others. It is possible for a writer to produce detective novels and also novels with psychological depth. I remember a review of Rendell's "Master of the Moor" by Auberon Waugh, which praised it and he claimed that if it had been written by a bright young thing just down from Oxford, it would be up for various literary prizes. Because it had been written by a woman who turned out umpteen dectective novels, it had not had the literary recognition it deserved.

    I sense a twinge of sexism and snobbery in Taz's comments. Neither woman came from a priviledged background and P.D. James, particularly, had to overcome struggles in her life.
    What shit.

    Sexism and snobbery. I’m hardly from a privileged background either and I like both writers output.

    I love the Ruth Rendell mysteries and am very disappointed most Wexford mysteries won’t see a DVD release due to rights issues. Still I have my off airs I have ripped to watch so I still have most of them.

    I’ve read a few and watched them all.

    I’m watching my DVD of the Mysteries what was release by Network at the moment although had to take a step off at Heartstones as it was not on the DVD. I got a YouTube rip. Same as Thornapple.

    Rendell isn’t just all Detective novels but her output is very middle England.

    The precise reason I like them is there is a twee and middle class element to them.

    With the exception of Midsomer Murders, which I long since gave up on, we don’t really get that now.

  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,690

    Andy_JS said:

    WTF????


    PoliticsHome

    @politicshome


    The BBC has decided not to send its flagship Politics Live programme to party conferences this year, PolHome understands

    A former culture secretary said it was a "further erosion" of the BBC's political coverage, and urged the corporation to think again

    From one point of view this is understandable, which is the very small number of people who watch party conferences.
    So what. If there is any reason for the BBC to not become just one more stream subscription (as many on PB would like) it is that it does the work that no one else does because it is a fucking public duty and helps a functioning and richer and democratic society. Inform, entertain, educate etc etc.

    It has totally lost its way imho.

    It's 'race around the world' shite vs hard core news such as Steven Sackur.

    Race arund the world isn't shite! I would say it is public service broadcasting at its best, insightful and educational programming.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 52,475

    Andy_JS said:

    WTF????


    PoliticsHome

    @politicshome


    The BBC has decided not to send its flagship Politics Live programme to party conferences this year, PolHome understands

    A former culture secretary said it was a "further erosion" of the BBC's political coverage, and urged the corporation to think again

    From one point of view this is understandable, which is the very small number of people who watch party conferences.
    So what. If there is any reason for the BBC to not become just one more stream subscription (as many on PB would like) it is that it does the work that no one else does because it is a fucking public duty and helps a functioning and richer and democratic society. Inform, entertain, educate etc etc.

    It has totally lost its way imho.

    It's 'race around the world' shite vs hard core news such as Steven Sackur.

    Race arund the world isn't shite! I would say it is public service broadcasting at its best, insightful and educational programming.
    Fair point. The real s**** are the daytime dross like Bargain Hunt and the endless series following people around who want to buy a house, or a second house.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,690
    viewcode said:

    Anybody thinking of emigrating should read this article. The author has emigrated to Portugal and it does not suit her https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lionel-shriver-left-britain-immigration-portugal-gsxrsh0qr

    Clarkson was right. Unless it's for work or a spectacular pay rise, emigration just turns you into somebody who constantly moans.

    Lionel Shriver gives the impression of being the kind of person who would moan wherever she happened to be living.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,690
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    WTF????


    PoliticsHome

    @politicshome


    The BBC has decided not to send its flagship Politics Live programme to party conferences this year, PolHome understands

    A former culture secretary said it was a "further erosion" of the BBC's political coverage, and urged the corporation to think again

    From one point of view this is understandable, which is the very small number of people who watch party conferences.
    So what. If there is any reason for the BBC to not become just one more stream subscription (as many on PB would like) it is that it does the work that no one else does because it is a fucking public duty and helps a functioning and richer and democratic society. Inform, entertain, educate etc etc.

    It has totally lost its way imho.

    It's 'race around the world' shite vs hard core news such as Steven Sackur.

    Race arund the world isn't shite! I would say it is public service broadcasting at its best, insightful and educational programming.
    Fair point. The real s**** are the daytime dross like Bargain Hunt and the endless series following people around who want to buy a house, or a second house.
    I'll give you that.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,425
    rcs1000 said:

    viewcode said:

    Anybody thinking of emigrating should read this article. The author has emigrated to Portugal and it does not suit her https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lionel-shriver-left-britain-immigration-portugal-gsxrsh0qr

    Clarkson was right. Unless it's for work or a spectacular pay rise, emigration just turns you into somebody who constantly moans.

    It didn't turn me into someone who constantly moans.

    That’s because you already constantly moaned….
  • MattWMattW Posts: 28,543
    Nigelb said:

    Good thread.

    As a person who covered Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal trial, and who has read through pretty much every single Jeffrey Epstein lawsuit, I find the current discourse to be in bizarro land...
    https://x.com/JayShams/status/1948192038060454089

    I think the thread is naive. As I read it he is still trying to believe that the US Institutions of Govt are working, and will reflect due process rather than Trump trying to cover his backside for whatever he did when he was out partying with his pal Epstein around young women and underage girls.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,425

    People in Wales who cannot eat gluten will be given debit-style cards preloaded with money to help pay for their food.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l4d3g4p2do

    Because there is an unlimited budget?
  • SandraMcSandraMc Posts: 768
    Taz said:

    SandraMc said:

    Taz said:

    Cicero said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    I’m watching Children of Men for the first time. Wanted something cheerful and uplifting. Hear it’s a blast

    Written by the same person who wrote endless twee middle class murder mysteries/love triangles/Detective stories which were an ITV staple all through the nineties, for goodness sake !
    I wouldn´t call P D James "twee", though her early books did get a bit formulaic at times. The books are, I think, better than the telly.

    There is a run of her novels, starting with a Shroud for a Nightingale that put her in the front rank of detective fiction.
    Ah, my error. I thought it Ruth Rendell.
    I wouldn't describe the work of either Ruth Rendell or P.D. James as twee, although some of their novels are not as good as others. It is possible for a writer to produce detective novels and also novels with psychological depth. I remember a review of Rendell's "Master of the Moor" by Auberon Waugh, which praised it and he claimed that if it had been written by a bright young thing just down from Oxford, it would be up for various literary prizes. Because it had been written by a woman who turned out umpteen dectective novels, it had not had the literary recognition it deserved.

    I sense a twinge of sexism and snobbery in Taz's comments. Neither woman came from a priviledged background and P.D. James, particularly, had to overcome struggles in her life.
    What shit.

    Sexism and snobbery. I’m hardly from a privileged background either and I like both writers output.

    I love the Ruth Rendell mysteries and am very disappointed most Wexford mysteries won’t see a DVD release due to rights issues. Still I have my off airs I have ripped to watch so I still have most of them.

    I’ve read a few and watched them all.

    I’m watching my DVD of the Mysteries what was release by Network at the moment although had to take a step off at Heartstones as it was not on the DVD. I got a YouTube rip. Same as Thornapple.

    Rendell isn’t just all Detective novels but her output is very middle England.

    The precise reason I like them is there is a twee and middle class element to them.

    With the exception of Midsomer Murders, which I long since gave up on, we don’t really get that now.

    Apologies if I misinterpreted your comments. I thought you were sneering at them. Middle class seems to be used as an insult these days.
  • TazTaz Posts: 19,905
    SandraMc said:

    Taz said:

    SandraMc said:

    Taz said:

    Cicero said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    I’m watching Children of Men for the first time. Wanted something cheerful and uplifting. Hear it’s a blast

    Written by the same person who wrote endless twee middle class murder mysteries/love triangles/Detective stories which were an ITV staple all through the nineties, for goodness sake !
    I wouldn´t call P D James "twee", though her early books did get a bit formulaic at times. The books are, I think, better than the telly.

    There is a run of her novels, starting with a Shroud for a Nightingale that put her in the front rank of detective fiction.
    Ah, my error. I thought it Ruth Rendell.
    I wouldn't describe the work of either Ruth Rendell or P.D. James as twee, although some of their novels are not as good as others. It is possible for a writer to produce detective novels and also novels with psychological depth. I remember a review of Rendell's "Master of the Moor" by Auberon Waugh, which praised it and he claimed that if it had been written by a bright young thing just down from Oxford, it would be up for various literary prizes. Because it had been written by a woman who turned out umpteen dectective novels, it had not had the literary recognition it deserved.

    I sense a twinge of sexism and snobbery in Taz's comments. Neither woman came from a priviledged background and P.D. James, particularly, had to overcome struggles in her life.
    What shit.

    Sexism and snobbery. I’m hardly from a privileged background either and I like both writers output.

    I love the Ruth Rendell mysteries and am very disappointed most Wexford mysteries won’t see a DVD release due to rights issues. Still I have my off airs I have ripped to watch so I still have most of them.

    I’ve read a few and watched them all.

    I’m watching my DVD of the Mysteries what was release by Network at the moment although had to take a step off at Heartstones as it was not on the DVD. I got a YouTube rip. Same as Thornapple.

    Rendell isn’t just all Detective novels but her output is very middle England.

    The precise reason I like them is there is a twee and middle class element to them.

    With the exception of Midsomer Murders, which I long since gave up on, we don’t really get that now.

    Apologies if I misinterpreted your comments. I thought you were sneering at them. Middle class seems to be used as an insult these days.
    No worries. Apologies if I overreacted. I absolutely cherish them.

  • TazTaz Posts: 19,905
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    WTF????


    PoliticsHome

    @politicshome


    The BBC has decided not to send its flagship Politics Live programme to party conferences this year, PolHome understands

    A former culture secretary said it was a "further erosion" of the BBC's political coverage, and urged the corporation to think again

    From one point of view this is understandable, which is the very small number of people who watch party conferences.
    So what. If there is any reason for the BBC to not become just one more stream subscription (as many on PB would like) it is that it does the work that no one else does because it is a fucking public duty and helps a functioning and richer and democratic society. Inform, entertain, educate etc etc.

    It has totally lost its way imho.

    It's 'race around the world' shite vs hard core news such as Steven Sackur.

    Race arund the world isn't shite! I would say it is public service broadcasting at its best, insightful and educational programming.
    Fair point. The real s**** are the daytime dross like Bargain Hunt and the endless series following people around who want to buy a house, or a second house.
    What do you expect ?

    It’s cheap TV.

    They only have a finite budget and hardly anyone watches during the day.

    They even cut stuff like Doctors, the daytime soap.
Sign In or Register to comment.