politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The week’s Local By-Election Results : Gains for SNP, UKIP
East Riding of Yorkshire
Bridlington Central and Old Town
Result: UKIP 401 (31%), Conservative 352 (27%), Dealtry (Independent) 217 (17%), Dixon (Independent) 214 (16%), Tate (Independent) 116 (9%)
UKIP GAIN from Social Democrat with a majority of 49 (4%)
Total Independent vote: 547 (42%)
Comments
-
Luckyguy Typical Sugar comment, though he is clearly more of a Brown than a Miliband man0
-
Sky News
Jeremy Paxman Rules Out Mayor Of London Bid
The University Challenge host says he would not stand as Conservative candidate for the role - "for all the eclairs in Paris".
What a shame would have been fun to see Paxo on the rough end of a political interview0 -
Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.0 -
I distinctly remember Sugar ca 1990 being anything but pro-Labour.0
-
I think the Aberdeenshire result is skewed by the STV system used for by elections. A better guide would be to see 1st preference vote split. Same for Midlothian.0
-
Should that be Asfordby in Melton ?
If it is its the place where the last coal mine was dug in the UK.
0 -
In the HIllingdon ward in 2010 on the same day as the GE Labour were ahead by 1%. Yesterday they were ahead by 1%.
http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/19791/Charville-ward-results-20100 -
With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.
0 -
I'm not a big Sugar fan. I like the straight-talking Barrow boy style, but the actual content coming out of the mouth is pish. I appreciate he made his money, and well done to him, but fuck ups like the 'emailer phone' demonstrate no nous whatsoever these days.HYUFD said:Luckyguy Typical Sugar comment, though he is clearly more of a Brown than a Miliband man
0 -
NOM has dropped to 1.43 from 1.50 earlier today:
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/market?marketId=1.1014164900 -
Please don't call any pollster "dodgy". They are applying their methodology and you simply cannot compare 30% turnout local elections when you are selecting a councillor with general elections. If you could then I would have been elected an MP in 1992.Norm said:Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.
0 -
Interesting how his political evolution from Thatcher's boy to Labour luvvie has mirrored his faltering business fortunes.Itajai said:I distinctly remember Sugar ca 1990 being anything but pro-Labour.
0 -
All votes listed in STV elections ARE first preference and all changes in vote share are on first preferences in 20120
-
Except that the alternative to one career politician is invariably another career politician.another_richard said:With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.0 -
The Uxbridge area has been on a long term drift towards the Conservatives - IIRC Labour won the constituency in 1966 but not in 1997, the only such in all London. In some ways comparable to how Romford and Hornchurch on the other edge of London has swung to the rightItajai said:In the HIllingdon ward in 2010 on the same day as the GE Labour were ahead by 1%. Yesterday they were ahead by 1%.
http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/19791/Charville-ward-results-2010
By comparison the Hayes area to the south has moved massively towards Labour.
There are various demographic influences on these changes but I don't know enough about Charville to know how they might apply there.
0 -
Mitchell is a classic case of "I'm an MP so superior to you". Total arrogance in his approach to the police and in his libel suit..another_richard said:With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.
See also Emily Thornberry as a "I'm sneering at white trash who have patriotic feelings".
Our MPs are supposed to represent us plebs in Parliament. It would appear at least two thinks we are inferior beings to their rich and propertied selves.
(It's as moronic and short sighted as the French aristocracy in the days of Louis X1V "let them eat cake" stuff.)
I am not by any means a UKIP supporter but their comments about Westminster elites ring strangely true.
See also Michael Portillo who got treated as he deserved in 1997..(and I suggest became a nicer person afterwards)
0 -
True and I'm sure much of the dislike will quickly transfer onto the next person elected.david_herdson said:
Except that the alternative to one career politician is invariably another career politician.another_richard said:With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.
But I think its going to be easier for the next one to be elected in the first place.
0 -
Whilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?david_herdson said:
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
0 -
Unless we see a "Great Convergence" in the opinion polling then one or other of the pollsters are going to be left looking a bit silly, as per Angus Reid at GE2010. Populus are definitely out on something of a limb at the moment, but perhaps they will be vindicated?MikeSmithson said:
Please don't call any pollster "dodgy". They are applying their methodology and you simply cannot compare 30% turnout local elections when you are selecting a councillor with general elections. If you could then I would have been elected an MP in 1992.Norm said:Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.
This huge spread does do one thing worthy of note. It allows partisans on either side to find a poll to reassure them. Other people's confirmation bias is a rich vein of opportunity for the astute political gambler who can keep a level head.0 -
And the Tories won the 1997 by election.another_richard said:
The Uxbridge area has been on a long term drift towards the Conservatives - IIRC Labour won the constituency in 1966 but not in 1997, the only such in all London. In some ways comparable to how Romford and Hornchurch on the other edge of London has swung to the rightItajai said:In the HIllingdon ward in 2010 on the same day as the GE Labour were ahead by 1%. Yesterday they were ahead by 1%.
http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/19791/Charville-ward-results-2010
By comparison the Hayes area to the south has moved massively towards Labour.
There are various demographic influences on these changes but I don't know enough about Charville to know how they might apply there.
This ward is in Hayes which I suspect has a far higher ethnic population than it used to 25 years ago. Ealing has moved strongly Labour in the last 5 years and this has been balanced somewhat by HIllingdon moving Tory. Like in Havering possibly because of white flight.
BTW what happened to the excellent election-map website. The new dumbed down version run by the OS is pretty rubbish. How do I even get ward names?0 -
The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
0 -
Some parts of Uxbridge are drifting to Labour these days due to an increasing EM population.0
-
MikeMikeSmithson said:
Please don't call any pollster "dodgy". They are applying their methodology and you simply cannot compare 30% turnout local elections when you are selecting a councillor with general elections. If you could then I would have been elected an MP in 1992.Norm said:Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.
There was some talk in the media immediately after the 1992 election that Trevor Skeet would get a peerage and so free up the constituency for Chris Patton to return to parliament in a byelection to be held at the same time as the May local elections.
Was any of this discussed in the constituency ?
IIRC Trevor Skeet was not universally popular among his constituency party.
0 -
In broad terms online pollsters produces higher aggregates for CON/LAB than the phone firms.OblitusSumMe said:
Unless we see a "Great Convergence" in the opinion polling then one or other of the pollsters are going to be left looking a bit silly, as per Angus Reid at GE2010. Populus are definitely out on something of a limb at the moment, but perhaps they will be vindicated?MikeSmithson said:
Please don't call any pollster "dodgy". They are applying their methodology and you simply cannot compare 30% turnout local elections when you are selecting a councillor with general elections. If you could then I would have been elected an MP in 1992.Norm said:Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.
This huge spread does do one thing worthy of note. It allows partisans on either side to find a poll to reassure them. Other people's confirmation bias is a rich vein of opportunity for the astute political gambler who can keep a level head.
I can't work out what's driving the Populus figures although not so long ago they were one of the most pro-CON firms.
0 -
Evening all
A few random thoughts on the day - terrible news about Philip Hughes.
The great Cameron speech on immigration - well, yes but I'm tempted to say "so what ?". It's not a speech which will outflank UKIP in any sense but it's probably about as far as Cameron feels Europe will let him go at this time. The recent court ruling relating to EU citizens not being able to claim benefits in Germany has been a huge help.
I do find the idea of stopping citizens of new EU countries coming here to work until their economies "have converged more closely" laughable. No one applied that rigour when the times were good and we needed cheap skilled labour to keep the boom going. Indeed, I've long argued that admitting the former Communist countries of Eastern Europe to the EU after 1989 was less about economics than politics.
I'm also curious that those who get so animated in the defence of "British culture" have nothing to say about the latest import of Americana - "Black Friday". Do we need it - does it show the great British public in a positive light and are the likes of Tesco and the rest going to stump up for the extra Police costs they have caused ?0 -
Its good to see you back after a few years away.madasafish said:
Mitchell is a classic case of "I'm an MP so superior to you". Total arrogance in his approach to the police and in his libel suit..another_richard said:With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.
See also Emily Thornberry as a "I'm sneering at white trash who have patriotic feelings".
Our MPs are supposed to represent us plebs in Parliament. It would appear at least two thinks we are inferior beings to their rich and propertied selves.
(It's as moronic and short sighted as the French aristocracy in the days of Louis X1V "let them eat cake" stuff.)
I am not by any means a UKIP supporter but their comments about Westminster elites ring strangely true.
See also Michael Portillo who got treated as he deserved in 1997..(and I suggest became a nicer person afterwards)
I always wonder if some posters who disappear have died without anyone online knowing.
0 -
David Mellor also in the news recently. May have to travel by bus in the future.madasafish said:
Mitchell is a classic case of "I'm an MP so superior to you". Total arrogance in his approach to the police and in his libel suit..another_richard said:With usual warnings about anecdotes, the comments I've heard during the last day about Mitchell have been universally taking pleasure at his humiliation. Even from those who know the full story about the police misconduct.
Politicians are not popular.
This may lead to a general lowering of incumbency votes.
See also Emily Thornberry as a "I'm sneering at white trash who have patriotic feelings".
Our MPs are supposed to represent us plebs in Parliament. It would appear at least two thinks we are inferior beings to their rich and propertied selves.
(It's as moronic and short sighted as the French aristocracy in the days of Louis X1V "let them eat cake" stuff.)
I am not by any means a UKIP supporter but their comments about Westminster elites ring strangely true.
See also Michael Portillo who got treated as he deserved in 1997..(and I suggest became a nicer person afterwards)0 -
Totally agree there.stodge said:Evening all
I'm also curious that those who get so animated in the defence of "British culture" have nothing to say about the latest import of Americana - "Black Friday". Do we need it - does it show the great British public in a positive light and are the likes of Tesco and the rest going to stump up for the extra Police costs they have caused ?
Its not as if we need anymore encouragement to buy imported consumer tat.
And I'm baffled as to why the supermarkets are encouraging it. Last week they were aspiring to go upmarket with posh wines and whole serrano hams and now they're selling TVs at a loss to brawling chavs in the middle of the night. Very sophisticated.
0 -
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Fridaystodge said:Evening all
A few random thoughts on the day - terrible news about Philip Hughes.
The great Cameron speech on immigration - well, yes but I'm tempted to say "so what ?". It's not a speech which will outflank UKIP in any sense but it's probably about as far as Cameron feels Europe will let him go at this time. The recent court ruling relating to EU citizens not being able to claim benefits in Germany has been a huge help.
I do find the idea of stopping citizens of new EU countries coming here to work until their economies "have converged more closely" laughable. No one applied that rigour when the times were good and we needed cheap skilled labour to keep the boom going. Indeed, I've long argued that admitting the former Communist countries of Eastern Europe to the EU after 1989 was less about economics than politics.
I'm also curious that those who get so animated in the defence of "British culture" have nothing to say about the latest import of Americana - "Black Friday". Do we need it - does it show the great British public in a positive light and are the likes of Tesco and the rest going to stump up for the extra Police costs they have caused ?0 -
Those parts of Uxbridge closest to Hayes.Itajai said:
Uxbridge, or the Hayes area of Hillingdon?AndyJS said:Some parts of Uxbridge are drifting to Labour these days due to an increasing EM population.
And now you know why Labour are so keen to import voters.
Even Ruislip and Northwood are not as Tory as they used to be, relative to the national result.0 -
Regarding arrogant MPs and arrogant ex-MPs, my mother lives in Wareham where David ("Do you know who I am, cabbie?) Mellor grew up. I've heard several anecdotes about how he was obnoxious and full of himself as a schoolboy, so one thing you can say about Mellor is that he wasn't spoilt by power - he was always like that.0
-
In one sense, they still are the most Con firm; the average poll scores for Con in October were:MikeSmithson said:
In broad terms online pollsters produces higher aggregates for CON/LAB than the phone firms.OblitusSumMe said:
Unless we see a "Great Convergence" in the opinion polling then one or other of the pollsters are going to be left looking a bit silly, as per Angus Reid at GE2010. Populus are definitely out on something of a limb at the moment, but perhaps they will be vindicated?MikeSmithson said:
Please don't call any pollster "dodgy". They are applying their methodology and you simply cannot compare 30% turnout local elections when you are selecting a councillor with general elections. If you could then I would have been elected an MP in 1992.Norm said:Another week of perfectly respectable local polling for the Tories bar Aberdeenshire. Where is the evidence of the Labour lead beloved of Populus and the other dodgy pollsters?
Ukip will be happy as well.
This huge spread does do one thing worthy of note. It allows partisans on either side to find a poll to reassure them. Other people's confirmation bias is a rich vein of opportunity for the astute political gambler who can keep a level head.
I can't work out what's driving the Populus figures although not so long ago they were one of the most pro-CON firms.
Populus - 33.4
YouGov - 32.2
ICM - 31.0
Survation - 31.0
ComRes - 30.5
Opinium - 30.5
Mori - 30.0
Ashcroft - 29.8
Obviously, these aren't directly comparable as some firms only carried out one poll - and did so at different times of the month - while others published many. That said, and probably coincidentally, those who polled most are at the extreme end of the range above, which isn't what you'd expect from natural statistical variation.
The striking thing about Populus is how high their combined Con+Lab scores are: their October average being 69.2, compared with just 60.8 for Ashcroft and more than 3% more than any other pollster. They may be right but they're out on a limb.0 -
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).
0 -
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.0 -
And yet most of us do now carry phones that send email. An idea ahead of its time, perhaps? On that theme, many of the dot com boom failures are now part of everyday life -- technology has caught up with those early graphics-heavy animated designs that rendered websites unusable at the turn of the millenium.Luckyguy1983 said:
I'm not a big Sugar fan. I like the straight-talking Barrow boy style, but the actual content coming out of the mouth is pish. I appreciate he made his money, and well done to him, but fuck ups like the 'emailer phone' demonstrate no nous whatsoever these days.HYUFD said:Luckyguy Typical Sugar comment, though he is clearly more of a Brown than a Miliband man
0 -
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).
0 -
and the Queen gives thumbs up/down indication of whether or not the bargain hunters can keep what they have fought for.dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).0 -
Turn Black Friday into something more like The Hunger Games.RobD said:
and the Queen gives thumbs up/down indication of whether or not the bargain hunters can keep what they have fought for.dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).0 -
Where did Mr T learn his history? Or did it end in 1485? He needs to read up about the Slovak Fast Corps, for one thing: e.g.RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=IPr7nqR0M9AC&pg=PA6&lpg=PA6&dq=slovak+fast+corps&source=bl&ots=slF9A3PVGs&sig=NTCuBAOoP2FTRsDyPoJhrA7fok8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=weZ4VNu5PMbZar3ZgbgG&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=slovak fast corps&f=false
0 -
Release the hounds...TheScreamingEagles said:
Turn Black Friday into something more like The Hunger Games.RobD said:
and the Queen gives thumbs up/down indication of whether or not the bargain hunters can keep what they have fought for.dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).
0 -
May the odds ever be in your favour.dr_spyn said:
Release the hounds...TheScreamingEagles said:
Turn Black Friday into something more like The Hunger Games.RobD said:
and the Queen gives thumbs up/down indication of whether or not the bargain hunters can keep what they have fought for.dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).0 -
ROFL - BBC posted proof that the licence fee
a) Doesn't need inflationary increases
b) Should be halved at a minimum.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3jNgMzCEAEGJa3.jpg0 -
Or that it should have been halved 20 years agomegalomaniacs4u said:ROFL - BBC posted proof that the licence fee
a) Doesn't need inflationary increases
b) Should be halved at a minimum.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3jNgMzCEAEGJa3.jpg0 -
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
0 -
Brent crude closes at $700
-
I lived in the States for five years in the Seventies, and we rather took to Thanksgiving as a holiday.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).
It is a rather glorified harvest festival, but a Turkey dinner with pumpkin pie and all the family getting together is a rather nice celebration. Much like Christmas without the commercialism.
My family kept it up for a few years after our return.
Those early colonials saw themselves as Englishmen abroad, and so Thankgiving has its roots in English Puritan traditions.0 -
The Hunger Games, except Panem is Asda/Argos/Tesco etc...dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).
Edit - already been said!
The coverage of people treading on their fellow citizens to get to a discount LCD TV chilled me. What has society become? Disgusting and vile, is what it's become.0 -
KentRising
"The coverage of people treading on their fellow citizens to get to a discount LCD TV chilled me. What has society become? Disgusting and vile, is what it's become."
Selfish and greedy, just as the god fearing right always wanted.0 -
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.0 -
People have always been selfish and greedy, especially the plebs. its the only way they can enjoy themselves.Smarmeron said:KentRising
"The coverage of people treading on their fellow citizens to get to a discount LCD TV chilled me. What has society become? Disgusting and vile, is what it's become."
Selfish and greedy, just as the god fearing right always wanted.0 -
Broken, sleazy Brent Crude on the slide?Financier said:Brent crude closes at $70
0 -
Apparently Nigeria is going to go bankrupt as a result of Brent crude being at $70 or less. Saudis won't be popular in the country.0
-
Why isn't there an Asian Friday or a White Friday?0
-
Apparently the "commercialism" is no more delayed than it is at Christmas. For Boxing Day, read Black Friday. A day of "a nice celebration" followed by urban warfare at the shopping centre.foxinsoxuk said:
I lived in the States for five years in the Seventies, and we rather took to Thanksgiving as a holiday.
It is a rather glorified harvest festival, but a Turkey dinner with pumpkin pie and all the family getting together is a rather nice celebration. Much like Christmas without the commercialism.
My family kept it up for a few years after our return.
Those early colonials saw themselves as Englishmen abroad, and so Thankgiving has its roots in English Puritan traditions.
Ho hum...
0 -
What about black Welsh disabled woman trades unionist Friday?Sunil_Prasannan said:Why isn't there an Asian Friday or a White Friday?
0 -
You jest but I'd be surprised if the EU hasn't created such a day.RobD said:
What about black Welsh disabled woman trades unionist Friday?Sunil_Prasannan said:Why isn't there an Asian Friday or a White Friday?
0 -
Troup on Aberdeenshire: etc.
And there was I beginning to believe those true believers on here predicting the great Con resurgence in Scotland. Moniker? Easter? Scott?0 -
We need to send all these bloody obnoxious foreign imports back. There's no place in our culture for Black Friday, Halloween, School Prom Nights, or the ludicrously named American "football" desecrating hallowed English turf!0
-
That's not the least of their worries:AndyJS said:Apparently Nigeria is going to go bankrupt as a result of Brent crude being at $70 or less. Saudis won't be popular in the country.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-302509500 -
0
-
Mmm, they love Islam so much that they blow up a mosque. Makes sense, as Richard Dawkins might say.Sunil_Prasannan said:
That's not the least of their worries:AndyJS said:Apparently Nigeria is going to go bankrupt as a result of Brent crude being at $70 or less. Saudis won't be popular in the country.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-302509500 -
Does that include you too, Financier?Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.
Or are you worth it?0 -
Poland has less than half the GDP per capita than Britain. If you pay more you will get a higher standard of British worker. Good anecdote in a Farewell to Alms about the superiority of British to Polish workers.Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.0 -
Re Tebbitt test, given we've been at war with practically everyone at some point, that means we should simply... Hate all foreigners!0
-
And Scotland - or rather a putative independent Scotland. As it is its the UK that takes the straion as we produce oil. I guess on balance though we can be pleased that oil price is lower. There are lower revenues but lower inflation and wider spending power. For the UK the oil industey is not a one man band.rcs1000 said:
Good news for energy importers - us, China, Europe. Bad news for the Middle East, Canada, AustraliaFinancier said:Brent crude closes at $70
0 -
Already been done. Venue was the Metrocentre this afternoon.TheScreamingEagles said:
Turn Black Friday into something more like The Hunger Games.RobD said:
and the Queen gives thumbs up/down indication of whether or not the bargain hunters can keep what they have fought for.dr_spyn said:
Perhaps the discounted sale goods could be placed in an colossal arena, with seating for 100,000 people, would be bargain hunters could be armed with axes, spears and swords.stodge said:
Well, I can't answer that and I'm sure you're not making any comparison. The points I would make about "Black Friday" are first that it's an imported piece of American culture (same as "Prom Nights"). We have a proud British culture and don't need this constant Americanisation of our lives.Itajai said:
Wonder what Emily Thornberry would have made of Black Friday
Second, the good honest British tradition of clawing your neighbour's eyes out for a bargain has a place - it's called Boxing Day. We don't need to have it twice in the same year.
Third, it illustrates the degree to which we are still wedded to conspicuous consumption yet tainted with the sure-footed knowledge that we are getting a bargain. As we fight for that heavily-discounted gadget without which our lives would no longer be complete, do we ever wonder why the store is selling them at that price and, given the obvious demand, why they couldn't sell them at that price all the time ?
It's all about "the triumph of the deal" - my gadget is £150 cheaper than it was last week - I've got to get it NOW before the price goes up and I'll stand outside a packed Tesco's and fight complete strangers for it.
And some claim there are no values left (well, only the heavily discounted ones).0 -
-
It was a rather uncommercial festival 35 years ago. It may be different now.stodge said:
Apparently the "commercialism" is no more delayed than it is at Christmas. For Boxing Day, read Black Friday. A day of "a nice celebration" followed by urban warfare at the shopping centre.foxinsoxuk said:
I lived in the States for five years in the Seventies, and we rather took to Thanksgiving as a holiday.
It is a rather glorified harvest festival, but a Turkey dinner with pumpkin pie and all the family getting together is a rather nice celebration. Much like Christmas without the commercialism.
My family kept it up for a few years after our return.
Those early colonials saw themselves as Englishmen abroad, and so Thankgiving has its roots in English Puritan traditions.
Ho hum...
Socialism and Communism are as much materialistic philosophies as Capitalism. All of these are focussed on generating or distributing material goods.SquareRoot said:
People have always been selfish and greedy, especially the plebs. its the only way they can enjoy themselves.Smarmeron said:KentRising
"The coverage of people treading on their fellow citizens to get to a discount LCD TV chilled me. What has society become? Disgusting and vile, is what it's become."
Selfish and greedy, just as the god fearing right always wanted.
We need to lift our eyes in thanksgiving for a non-materialist philosophy.
0 -
err that is a fallacy, you can only pay more if the standard of worker is better trained/more productive, more money wont make an employee better skilled, it'll make him lazier.. mor cash for doing nothing more.FalseFlag said:
Poland has less than half the GDP per capita than Britain. If you pay more you will get a higher standard of British worker. Good anecdote in a Farewell to Alms about the superiority of British to Polish workers.Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.
0 -
So, the simple problem is that British companies pay too little?FalseFlag said:
Poland has less than half the GDP per capita than Britain. If you pay more you will get a higher standard of British worker. Good anecdote in a Farewell to Alms about the superiority of British to Polish workers.Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.
But if what you were saying was true, then the British companies that paid more, and got these (otherwise unemployed) British workers, would be out competing other companies.
Capitalism would work, and those companies who foolishly hired Poles would go out of business.
0 -
Yes, but Canada has lots of expensive traditional oil production, and high capex, high opex oil sands too.AndyJS said:0 -
Prices have come down about 10p a litre since July, they will come down a little more in the next few weeks, I'm sure. The weak pound ,and high taxes, means they are unlikely to fall too far.Monksfield said:0 -
Except the Potuguese?rcs1000 said:Re Tebbitt test, given we've been at war with practically everyone at some point, that means we should simply... Hate all foreigners!
In defence of Tebbitt (!); he was a pilot and like many other airmen of his generation was very grateful for the airmen of the Polish and Czechoslovakian airforces who were essential to the Battle of Britain.
I am glad to have Poles and Czechs as countrymen, they are fine people who integrate well.0 -
I am a regular visitor to Czecho and what a fantastic country it is: great beer, attractive countryside and friendly people. The only mystery is why they would want to come here.foxinsoxuk said:
Except the Potuguese?rcs1000 said:Re Tebbitt test, given we've been at war with practically everyone at some point, that means we should simply... Hate all foreigners!
In defence of Tebbitt (!); he was a pilot and like many other airmen of his generation was very grateful for the airmen of the Polish and Czechoslovakian airforces who were essential to the Battle of Britain.
I am glad to have Poles and Czechs as countrymen, they are fine people who integrate well.0 -
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.kle4 said:RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
It's an absurd test but since Germany Italy and Austria are not the nations 'sending' their migrants and that Russia and the former constituents of the USSR were also on our side then I assume Tebbit is happy to receive immigrants from the former Soviet states and Warsaw Pact countries.
In terms of economics of course it hardly matters if the immigrant comes from Poland or Germany or Romania, but again we must assume Tebbit thus accepts the economics of it.
Its also good to see Tebbit expects and values the notion of absorbing immigrants into our culture0 -
Tomorrow it's the Hennessy at Newbury: Always a great race, with Irish raider Djakadam currently heading the betting. Whilst he could have plenty in hand, it's a big ask of a 5 year old to win one of the most competitive staying handicaps of the season and there might just be a bit of value elsewhere:
Phillip Hobbs has been in fine form and saddles Fingal Bay. Having had an injury a couple of seasons ago he's still unexposed as a chaser and has many of the credentials - likes soft, will stay - to run well here. A sporting bet at around 8-1.
Monbeg Dude looks attractively weighted. A horse with a big engine, his weakness is his tendency to clout a couple on the way round. As a Welsh National winner a test of stamina is right up his street and I've had a few quid ew at 20-1. If he were to jump well he should be thereabouts and in my view the booking of Paul Moloney is a positive.0 -
It's an absurd test but since Germany Italy and Austria are not the nations 'sending' their migrants and that Russia and the former constituents of the USSR were also on our side then I assume Tebbit is happy to receive immigrants from the former Soviet states and Warsaw Pact countries.Flightpath said:
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.kle4 said:RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
In terms of economics of course it hardly matters if the immigrant comes from Poland or Germany or Romania, but again we must assume Tebbit thus accepts the economics of it.
Its also good to see Tebbit expects and values the notion of absorbing immigrants into our culture
He calls it the "sins of my fathers, test"0 -
The booking of Paul Moloney is always a positive.Monksfield said:Tomorrow it's the Hennessy at Newbury: Always a great race, with Irish raider Djakadam currently heading the betting. Whilst he could have plenty in hand, it's a big ask of a 5 year old to win one of the most competitive staying handicaps of the season and there might just be a bit of value elsewhere:
Phillip Hobbs has been in fine form and saddles Fingal Bay. Having had an injury a couple of seasons ago he's still unexposed as a chaser and has many of the credentials - likes soft, will stay - to run well here. A sporting bet at around 8-1.
Monbeg Dude looks attractively weighted. A horse with a big engine, his weakness is his tendency to clout a couple on the way round. As a Welsh National winner a test of stamina is right up his street and I've had a few quid ew at 20-1. If he were to jump well he should be thereabouts and in my view the booking of Paul Moloney is a positive.0 -
Quite the opposite, a comparable standard British worker requires a higher wage. Of course the real solution is to bring back slavery.rcs1000 said:
So, the simple problem is that British companies pay too little?FalseFlag said:
Poland has less than half the GDP per capita than Britain. If you pay more you will get a higher standard of British worker. Good anecdote in a Farewell to Alms about the superiority of British to Polish workers.Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.
But if what you were saying was true, then the British companies that paid more, and got these (otherwise unemployed) British workers, would be out competing other companies.
Capitalism would work, and those companies who foolishly hired Poles would go out of business.
0 -
another richard - ''now they're selling TVs at a loss to brawling chavs in the middle of the night.''
Now you have to be careful, only chosen BBC comedy game show participants can use such clever post modern sub-irony in their remarks and certainly not to policemen.
The real sub-irony is that the target of the mass hysteria (and its useful to be reminded that it does exist) is the wide screen TV when in fact there is absolutely zero worth watching on it.0 -
Just as a bit of a joke, I put £2 on New Zealand with Betfair yesterday in their Test Match vs Pakistan. I haven't been following it but I'm now being offered a cashout of £30, so things must have moved in New Zealand's favour a fair bit.
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/cricket/event?id=272842750 -
He calls it the "sins of my fathers, test"rcs1000 said:
It's an absurd test but since Germany Italy and Austria are not the nations 'sending' their migrants and that Russia and the former constituents of the USSR were also on our side then I assume Tebbit is happy to receive immigrants from the former Soviet states and Warsaw Pact countries.Flightpath said:
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.kle4 said:RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
In terms of economics of course it hardly matters if the immigrant comes from Poland or Germany or Romania, but again we must assume Tebbit thus accepts the economics of it.
Its also good to see Tebbit expects and values the notion of absorbing immigrants into our culture
His original cricket test made sense, but this one is plain bonkers.0 -
I need to get my Tebbit Chip updated0
-
You must always bet against Pakistan.AndyJS said:Just as a bit of a joke, I put £2 on New Zealand with Betfair yesterday in their Test Match vs Pakistan. I haven't been following it but I'm now being offered a cashout of £30, so things must have moved in New Zealand's favour a fair bit.
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/cricket/event?id=27284275
You get two chances of winning - one that they are genuinely beaten and the other that they throw it anyway.0 -
There is a problem that a number of the energy intermediaries are going to face over the next few months. A lot of the oil companies managed to sell future oil production six months ago at values way above the current price. There are millions of barrels of oil that have been sold on to the market which have not yet been delivered and which the energy companies paid over $100 a barrel for. They have to pay that price even though the oil price has now dropped to $70 a barrel.Monksfield said:
Of course they deserve no sympathy as they were playing a game betting that the price would stay high or even increase with all the turmoil in the middle east and they guessed wrong./
I expect they are going to have a very uncomfortable time over the next few months.0 -
It's an absurd test but since Germany Italy and Austria are not the nations 'sending' their migrants and that Russia and the former constituents of the USSR were also on our side then I assume Tebbit is happy to receive immigrants from the former Soviet states and Warsaw Pact countries.Flightpath said:
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.kle4 said:RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
In terms of economics of course it hardly matters if the immigrant comes from Poland or Germany or Romania, but again we must assume Tebbit thus accepts the economics of it.
Its also good to see Tebbit expects and values the notion of absorbing immigrants into our culture
The countries that he mentioned were not merely allied with us. Their men fought in British uniforms alongside Commonwealth countries.
My grandfather worked with a lot of Polish miners after the war. He was very happy with them as friends. Their descendants are indistinguishable from other Brits apart from unspellable names.
If only other migrant communities that arrived a decade or two later were so well integrated!
0 -
It's an absurd test but since Germany Italy and Austria are not the nations 'sending' their migrants and that Russia and the former constituents of the USSR were also on our side then I assume Tebbit is happy to receive immigrants from the former Soviet states and Warsaw Pact countries.Flightpath said:
Seems a bit of an odd test. It would hardly be my fault if my grandfathers fought on the wrong side.kle4 said:RobD said:The new Tebbit test:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11262132/Lord-Tebbit-announces-new-cricket-test-for-EU-countries.htmlIn an interview with BBC Newsnight, Lord Tebbit said: "Well one test I would use is to ask them on which side their fathers or grandfathers or whatever fought in the Second World War. And so you'll find that the Poles and the Czechs and the Slovaks were all on the right side. And so that's a pretty good test isn’t it? Perhaps we'll even manage to teach them to play cricket over the years."
In terms of economics of course it hardly matters if the immigrant comes from Poland or Germany or Romania, but again we must assume Tebbit thus accepts the economics of it.
Its also good to see Tebbit expects and values the notion of absorbing immigrants into our culture
Although amusingly it does mean that he's now presumably backing unlimited Pakistani and Bangladeshi immigration?0 -
So, you're saying that British firms are acting rationally, as Polish workers sometimes offer better value for money?FalseFlag said:
Quite the opposite, a comparable standard British worker requires a higher wage. Of course the real solution is to bring back slavery.rcs1000 said:
So, the simple problem is that British companies pay too little?FalseFlag said:
Poland has less than half the GDP per capita than Britain. If you pay more you will get a higher standard of British worker. Good anecdote in a Farewell to Alms about the superiority of British to Polish workers.Financier said:
The Mirror story shows how uncompetitive the UK has become globally and how we have paid ourselves too much for years.david_herdson said:
I don't know South Elmsall all that well though I did visit briefly a couple of times. There isn't really anything in that article that surprises me much though.another_richard said:
[David, w]hilst living in Hemsworth did you ever sample the joys of South Elmsall ?
This Mirror story helps explain the Labour to UKIP swing in the Yorkshire mining areas:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-offered-polish-4709994
Though the Mirror do manage to put an anti-Conservative slant on it.
It also reveals the major errors of the EU, how our benefit system is a disincentive for many to be employed.
Also many employers know that often a Polish worker has a better work ethic, is more reliable ad more likely to get out of bed on time.
But if what you were saying was true, then the British companies that paid more, and got these (otherwise unemployed) British workers, would be out competing other companies.
Capitalism would work, and those companies who foolishly hired Poles would go out of business.0 -
While that's true of the utilities, most petrol retailers (Shell, etc.) don't forward by their oil.Richard_Tyndall said:
There is a problem that a number of the energy intermediaries are going to face over the next few months. A lot of the oil companies managed to sell future oil production six months ago at values way above the current price. There are millions of barrels of oil that have been sold on to the market which have not yet been delivered and which the energy companies paid over $100 a barrel for. They have to pay that price even though the oil price has now dropped to $70 a barrel.Monksfield said:
Of course they deserve no sympathy as they were playing a game betting that the price would stay high or even increase with all the turmoil in the middle east and they guessed wrong./
I expect they are going to have a very uncomfortable time over the next few months.
I met the guy who runs Shell's petrol station network in the UK a few years ago on a trip to Qatar. Nice chap, runs a multi billion pound chain of shops. His business card bore the title "Manager, Shell Retail"0 -
No polls?0
-
Ach zo mien fuhrer. Zees ees unt eenterasstink ideeya off zee booziness feelur. Das Kapitalist zells the failink booziness fur zee heaps of Euros to zee nituntwittens unt zen, ya? zee halfwitgenstein he buys all zee bildinks he cun lay zee hans on for the meereist pfenninks unt zen rents for das zilly money. Propertyschmopeerty eh?Luckyguy1983 said:
Interesting how his political evolution from Thatcher's boy to Labour luvvie has mirrored his faltering business fortunes.Itajai said:I distinctly remember Sugar ca 1990 being anything but pro-Labour.
Vat a dumpenkopfff sucker iss diss Zucker. Such luck zat he now has ze billion of ze dollars.0 -
Football, in all its forms, is called football because its played on foot, rather than on horseback. It's thus perfectly sensibly named - just as much as rugby football, for example.TwistedFireStopper said:We need to send all these bloody obnoxious foreign imports back. There's no place in our culture for Black Friday, Halloween, School Prom Nights, or the ludicrously named American "football" desecrating hallowed English turf!
0 -
Transfers from Midlothian East
LD: 16 to Lab, 13 to Greens, 11 to Con, 10 to SNP, 9 to Ind
Greens: 73 to SNP, 42 to Ind, 33 to Lab, 17 to Con (SNP takes the lead by 14 votes)
Con: 100 to Lab, 83 to Ind, 27 to SNP
Ind: 239 to Lab, 229 to SNP
0 -
Those in trouble are the refineriesrcs1000 said:
While that's true of the utilities, most petrol retailers (Shell, etc.) don't forward by their oil.Richard_Tyndall said:
There is a problem that a number of the energy intermediaries are going to face over the next few months. A lot of the oil companies managed to sell future oil production six months ago at values way above the current price. There are millions of barrels of oil that have been sold on to the market which have not yet been delivered and which the energy companies paid over $100 a barrel for. They have to pay that price even though the oil price has now dropped to $70 a barrel.Monksfield said:
Of course they deserve no sympathy as they were playing a game betting that the price would stay high or even increase with all the turmoil in the middle east and they guessed wrong./
I expect they are going to have a very uncomfortable time over the next few months.
I met the guy who runs Shell's petrol station network in the UK a few years ago on a trip to Qatar. Nice chap, runs a multi billion pound chain of shops. His business card bore the title "Manager, Shell Retail"0 -
My dear boy the true etymology of the word 'football' comes from the ancient French-Norman, 'fatbill', which loosely translates as 'kick the peasant', a popular pastime of the semi detached castle owners of the time. Eventually the peasant would inevitably become decapitated, or 'plebed' in the French-Norman, and the rest as they say is history.Socrates said:
Football, in all its forms, is called football because its played on foot, rather than on horseback. It's thus perfectly sensibly named - just as much as rugby football, for example.TwistedFireStopper said:We need to send all these bloody obnoxious foreign imports back. There's no place in our culture for Black Friday, Halloween, School Prom Nights, or the ludicrously named American "football" desecrating hallowed English turf!
0