Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

Scottish independence hasn’t gone away you know – politicalbetting.com

245

Comments

  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,479
    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    What's ridiculous about it? Putin's only way to survive may rapidly become declaring all out war with NATO and hoping he can cling on in a total war setting.

  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,537
    Nadine not doing the Tories any favours today!
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,096
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    No, Putin is bogged down, with his forces unable to take a pit village on the Don. The idea that he is a conventional threat to us is risible. Perhaps slightly more real for Poland and the Baltics, but not us.

    Conscription into a citizen army is a nonsense. We have no equipment, accommodation or money to pay them.

    Interesting piece in The Observer on why the armed forces can't recruit.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/28/plummeting-morale-low-pay-unjust-wars-it-is-no-wonder-young-people-resist-joining-up

    Incidentally, I think citing unjust wars is wrong. People joining the services don't just want to train, they actually want to test themselves in combat and kill. We need some pointless military campaign to keep them interested. Perhaps the Yemen will need to do.

    What have those poor souls done wrong? Fought over by proxies for the Saudis and the Iranians, and down you’re wishing gung-ho British squaddies on them.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who are the people? Is 'apparently sensible' doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence?
    The Swedish government?


    Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism

    It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, “

    https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240118-sweden-s-call-for-population-to-prepare-for-war-sparks-panic-and-criticism
    I see. Sweden have been at war with Peter the Great's Russia, and probably other times I've not read about. Brutal conflict. The Swedish King was very brilliant but they lost in the end. I think it was Sweden invading a bit of Russia from memory but I could be wrong.

    Being prepared against an invasion just seems wise to me - we should be similarly prepared. Our Government uses strong words on the one hand and shitcans our one blast furnace making weapons grade steel on the other.
    I’m not arguing with any of that. HMG’s attitude to defence has been chaotically bad and stupid for decades

    Fighting wars we didn’t actually need to fight - Iraq, then Libya - and at the same time letting our armed forces wither so we can’t face real enemies who menace the UK
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,607
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    No, Putin is bogged down, with his forces unable to take a pit village on the Don. The idea that he is a conventional threat to us is risible. Perhaps slightly more real for Poland and the Baltics, but not us.

    Conscription into a citizen army is a nonsense. We have no equipment, accommodation or money to pay them.

    Interesting piece in The Observer on why the armed forces can't recruit.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/28/plummeting-morale-low-pay-unjust-wars-it-is-no-wonder-young-people-resist-joining-up

    Incidentally, I think citing unjust wars is wrong. People joining the services don't just want to train, they actually want to test themselves in combat and kill. We need some pointless military campaign to keep them interested. Perhaps the Yemen will need to do.

    Dura_Ace and others have made the same point about recruitment. Lousy pay, worse housing and Ryanair means no need to join up to see the world. Nowadays flights are cheap and soldiers are lucky to see Catterick.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,479
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,505
    edited January 28

    "UNRWA claims: UN agency condemns aid halt over alleged help for Hamas attacks"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68119268

    "It is shocking to see a suspension of funds to the agency in reaction to allegations against a small group of staff, especially given the immediate action that UNRWA took by terminating their contracts and asking for a transparent independent investigation. "

    There's so much to be said about this, little of it good. Sacking staff *before* an investigation sort-of prejudices the investigation, doesn't it? And what are the terms of the investigation - is it just into the specific direct allegations, or more into the way UNRWA was working in Gaza? And on the other hand, is it valid to stop funds to an organisation that is apparently doing so much good, even if some of what its staff do is bad?

    It’s a suspension of funds not the stopping of them permanently. The suspicion is that those who were sacked are scapegoats.

    UNRWA vehicles were used by the Oct 7 terrorists. That requires cooperation. The question is how high the rot goes.

    It was also pretty disturbing to hear UNRWA’s spokeswoman on the radio this morning describing the suspension of funds as a “collective punishment” for the Palestinian people. That’s a very specific term in this context.

    It’s… coincidental that Israel’s allegations towards UNWRA came out just after the ICJ preliminary ruling was issued and was somewhat critical of Israel.
    It might be. And haven't UNWRA actually sacked a bunch of people? I don't think it's just baseless Israeli accusations.
    I don’t think the accusations are baseless. I think it may be that Israel held back on making them until they wanted a distraction from the ICJ ruling.
    I think that is needlessly conspiratorial thinking, and the problem with that kind of thinking is that it's almost always possible to find a hook for it.

    If this information had come out around the time the ICJ was hearing the preliminary arguments, it could have been said to be a distraction from that. Or from any number of other events.

    By all means do not allow yourself to be distracted from the ICJ ruling. It's important that Israel is held to the instruction to discipline officials who make statements that excuse or encourage genocidal acts, for example.

    But once you start down the road of seeing conspiracies you'll start seeing them everywhere.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    What's ridiculous about it? Putin's only way to survive may rapidly become declaring all out war with NATO and hoping he can cling on in a total war setting.

    It’s a bit like the pandemic. A ludicrous idea - the whole world locking down for a bug out of a lab? - until it actually happens

    Remember: normalcy bias
  • Options
    StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,615
    IanB2 said:

    Nadine not doing the Tories any favours today!

    As Angus Deayton used to say,

    so no change there, then.

    What's she said now?
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Taiwan aside, why would China want to bite the hand that feeds its economy?
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,096

    Good morning

    I cannot see Independence happening for a long time but I doubt Labour running Scotland will diminish the ambition which was alive and well when I lived in Berwick-upon-Tweed in the mid fifties

    As an aside my son had a shout at 4.00am this morning and he and the crew of the inshore lifeboat managed to save a young girl in the water off the jetty

    A happy story for today

    How on earth did a ‘young girl’….. presumably teenager ……. manage to get herself in danger of drowning at 4am on a winter morning?
  • Options
    swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,437

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880

    Good morning

    I cannot see Independence happening for a long time but I doubt Labour running Scotland will diminish the ambition which was alive and well when I lived in Berwick-upon-Tweed in the mid fifties

    As an aside my son had a shout at 4.00am this morning and he and the crew of the inshore lifeboat managed to save a young girl in the water off the jetty

    A happy story for today

    How on earth did a ‘young girl’….. presumably teenager ……. manage to get herself in danger of drowning at 4am on a winter morning?
    PFO*?

    The most common reason for amateur boating drownings is the jetty or tender trip back from the pub.

    *"Pissed, Fell Over" as we used to record in medical notes.

  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    Yes. That’s where I’d invade if I was Vlad

    Its not in NATO, it was once part of the USSR, it has a tiny army, he’s got a readymade base in the enclave of transdniester next door

    He could probably conquer it in an hour and what would we do? Nothing, I suspect

    Moldova is not Ukraine. It could not fight back

    With Moldova swallowed he’d also have most of rUkraine surrounded
  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,802
    edited January 28
    Leon said:

    A Telegraph article which quotes a German defence paper which says Germany should prepare for a possible war with Russia as early as 2025

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/01/28/putin-russia-ukraine-west-avoid-world-war-three/

    If this was one solitary hysterical voice the inclination is to ignore it. But this is part of a choir of warnings from multiple sources

    The paper also suggests Putin will prevail in Ukraine this spring

    Most people in Britain are not going to fight in any war because they have forgotten about it after 80 years. It has died out over 3 generations or so. They then go on to invent stories that reassure themselves, like the green party defence policy, or the idea that the world is peaceful and we are the aggressors. Eventually this all gets culturally embedded and reflected in policy. It can go on ok for a while but is unlikely to end well.

    If you look at Russian strategy it is essentially opportunistic and exploiting this cultural weakness. It has vast borders to defend and a military budget a fraction of the size of western countries but it still goes on to opportunistically invade other countries in part because it views itself as a superior civilisation. It thinks that 80% of people would just submit to it and the other 20% can be dealt with.

    The western strategy to deal with Russia, given that we are where we are, is to bog it down in Ukraine. Make it defend a fake 'border' far in to Ukraine and keep supporting Ukraine in attacking it. The problem I can foresee is that it ends either when there is a political change of direction (as per afghanistan etc) or the cost eventually becomes too much to bear for Ukraine in terms of hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers with no willing replacements, and then Russia gets its victory.

  • Options

    Good morning

    I cannot see Independence happening for a long time but I doubt Labour running Scotland will diminish the ambition which was alive and well when I lived in Berwick-upon-Tweed in the mid fifties

    As an aside my son had a shout at 4.00am this morning and he and the crew of the inshore lifeboat managed to save a young girl in the water off the jetty

    A happy story for today

    How on earth did a ‘young girl’….. presumably teenager ……. manage to get herself in danger of drowning at 4am on a winter morning?
    Good morning @OldKingCole and hope you are well despite your health issues

    Our son is popping in later today so no doubt we will hear the full story but it does seem a strange time for an incident like this but no matter, she is now safe
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,537

    IanB2 said:

    Nadine not doing the Tories any favours today!

    As Angus Deayton used to say,

    so no change there, then.

    What's she said now?
    After saying that they all need to get behind the leader, she laid into Badenoch and Jenrick, calling them rebels, plotters and splitters...
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,021
    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
  • Options
    Foxy said:

    Good morning

    I cannot see Independence happening for a long time but I doubt Labour running Scotland will diminish the ambition which was alive and well when I lived in Berwick-upon-Tweed in the mid fifties

    As an aside my son had a shout at 4.00am this morning and he and the crew of the inshore lifeboat managed to save a young girl in the water off the jetty

    A happy story for today

    How on earth did a ‘young girl’….. presumably teenager ……. manage to get herself in danger of drowning at 4am on a winter morning?
    PFO*?

    The most common reason for amateur boating drownings is the jetty or tender trip back from the pub.

    *"Pissed, Fell Over" as we used to record in medical notes.

    It can also be mental health issues
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,016
    Good morning, everyone.

    Worth remembering Ukraine was easily defeated in 2014. They then spent years planning and training to make themselves militarily more resilient.

    Russia's future military interventions will also not be made with its 2022 military system and approach.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,976
    Foxy said:

    Good morning

    I cannot see Independence happening for a long time but I doubt Labour running Scotland will diminish the ambition which was alive and well when I lived in Berwick-upon-Tweed in the mid fifties

    As an aside my son had a shout at 4.00am this morning and he and the crew of the inshore lifeboat managed to save a young girl in the water off the jetty

    A happy story for today

    How on earth did a ‘young girl’….. presumably teenager ……. manage to get herself in danger of drowning at 4am on a winter morning?
    PFO*?

    The most common reason for amateur boating drownings is the jetty or tender trip back from the pub.

    *"Pissed, Fell Over" as we used to record in medical notes.

    As someone who lived in a seaside town whilst studying, I remember being actutely aware of the need to avoid going near the water after a night out, no much how good an idea everyone else thought it was.

    A couple of times a year, someone would get into trouble to the extent of needing to call out the brigade or the lifeboat, which I imagine was quickly sobering for those involved.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,479
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    Exactly.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,537
    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,688
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    Who was the 19th cent British politician who commented that (having taken a look at the terrain maps for Russia vs Afghanistan /India) if allowed, the Army would garrison The Moon against an invasion from Mars?
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,021

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880

    Good morning, everyone.

    Worth remembering Ukraine was easily defeated in 2014. They then spent years planning and training to make themselves militarily more resilient.

    Russia's future military interventions will also not be made with its 2022 military system and approach.

    Apart from its use of drones, Russia has largely regressed to WW1 tactics of heavy artillery bombardment then bloody infantry attacks. They seem incapable now with war of manoeuvre, or operations above battalion level. It is simply attrition, where they grind down Ukranian forces.

  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
  • Options

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
  • Options
    CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 40,039

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    Who was the 19th cent British politician who commented that (having taken a look at the terrain maps for Russia vs Afghanistan /India) if allowed, the Army would garrison The Moon against an invasion from Mars?
    Reputedly Lord Salisbury. 1905 at the latest, but I don't know if it was before or after the H. G. Wells novel.

    Still happens. British armed forces types were complaining about indyref cos it would danage UK defence against alien invasion.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,537
    Nadine's just watched a room full of people many of whom say they abandoned the Tories due to Boris Johnson, and still ends the programme arguing that people want Boris Johnson.
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    Cicero said:

    WillG said:

    Fishing said:

    "As bad political predictions go George Robertson’s prediction only has Sion Simon as a rival"

    Really? What about the Remainer drivel that leaving the EU would cause a house price crash, 3 million unemployed (or was it 5 million - they never seemed sure?), 100,000 job losses in the City, the disintegration of the Union, nobody wanting to deal with us, horrible discrimination against blacks and gay people who clearly owed all their rights to our EU membership, etc. etc?

    (Not that the Leave campaign got everything, or even most things, right either - forecasting is inherently difficult when there are lots of moving parts. But the Remainer scare stories really were in a class of their own for disingenous inaccuracy).

    Remainers on here were absolutely certain - and gleeful - that London would no longer be the pre-eminent European financial centre. The only question was whether it would be Frankfurt or Paris or Dublin that became the new #1.
    Actually it is, increasingly, Dubai. I wouldn't be too optimistic for the longer term in the
    City unless there is some serious reforms.
    It really isn’t

    Indeed, and I say that as a patriotic Remainer.

    Biggest threat to Financial Services and the City is a government that threatens to castrate an independent judiciary.


    Why do people like doing business in the UK? We have courts that will put the government in their box when they overreach.
    Language and timezone helps


    Nowhere near enough without an independent judiciary.

    It’s all important. An independent judiciary is necessary but not sufficient
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131
    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    What’s new. Areas like this have been on their own and left to wither for decades now anyway. Treated with barely disguised contempt by politicians across all parties.

    It was a major driver of the leave vote in these areas. Economic boom post crash. What economic boom. Areas like these never enjoyed it.

    Had prosperity been spread more evenly we would have never voted leave. Still, we did, and remainers need to get over it.
    The Remanian independence argument strikes me as being the sort of argument a toddler uses: ‘if we can’t have what I want, I’m taking my toys and going home’
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    IanB2 said:

    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.

    Isn't LauraK. the gold standard?
  • Options
    Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 7,614

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    It is - Talksport 2. Pretty poor commentary, though.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,704
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who are the people? Is 'apparently sensible' doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence?
    The Swedish government?


    Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism

    It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, “

    https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240118-sweden-s-call-for-population-to-prepare-for-war-sparks-panic-and-criticism
    This wouldn't be happening without serious intelligence of bad intentions.

    FWIW, I think it's actually about us all rearming sufficiently to deter Putin, so a war never happens.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880
    edited January 28
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Russia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    Geography: Grade F
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    "UNRWA claims: UN agency condemns aid halt over alleged help for Hamas attacks"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68119268

    "It is shocking to see a suspension of funds to the agency in reaction to allegations against a small group of staff, especially given the immediate action that UNRWA took by terminating their contracts and asking for a transparent independent investigation. "

    There's so much to be said about this, little of it good. Sacking staff *before* an investigation sort-of prejudices the investigation, doesn't it? And what are the terms of the investigation - is it just into the specific direct allegations, or more into the way UNRWA was working in Gaza? And on the other hand, is it valid to stop funds to an organisation that is apparently doing so much good, even if some of what its staff do is bad?

    It’s a suspension of funds not the stopping of them permanently. The suspicion is that those who were sacked are scapegoats.

    UNRWA vehicles were used by the Oct 7 terrorists. That requires cooperation. The question is how high the rot goes.

    It was also pretty disturbing to hear UNRWA’s spokeswoman on the radio this morning describing the suspension of funds as a “collective punishment” for the Palestinian people. That’s a very specific term in this context.

    It’s… coincidental that Israel’s allegations towards UNWRA came out just after the ICJ
    preliminary ruling was issued and was somewhat critical of Israel.
    That sounds like an excuse to dismiss the allegations without considering them. Almost like you don’t want to approach this is a fair and just manner. Perhaps you are biased towards one side?

    The reality is that the US and UK government moved quickly, suggesting that they had been thinking through the issues for some time. 7 other countries, including Germany, have responded in the same way, suggesting there is a prima facia case.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,704
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Putin wants the old USSR back. We all know this.

    All his moves over the last 10+ years point to it - he doesn't respect the independent "breakaway" states, and views them as illegitimate - and it's immensely popular in Russia itself, a bit like how China saw the reverse of its humiliations under the Western powers in the 19th and early 20th Century as an essential national mission.

    The only thing he (they) will respect is strength and resolve, which is why we have to rearm to 1990 levels and we're going to have to pay more tax for it, I'm afraid.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880
    edited January 28

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who are the people? Is 'apparently sensible' doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence?
    The Swedish government?


    Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism

    It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, “

    https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240118-sweden-s-call-for-population-to-prepare-for-war-sparks-panic-and-criticism
    This wouldn't be happening without serious intelligence of bad intentions.

    FWIW, I think it's actually about us all rearming sufficiently to deter Putin, so a war never happens.
    Nah, it's being driven by American Republicans stopping further aid to Ukraine and the prospect of Trump in the White House.

    They are doing exactly what Putin asks of them. I really cannot understand why @Sandpit supports them rather than Biden, who was Ukraines staunchest supporter.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,021

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    Very frustrating - especially given that this looks like being one of the most sensational England victories of all time.
  • Options
    Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,400

    IanB2 said:

    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.

    Isn't LauraK. the gold standard?
    Kay Burley is better
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Weirdly, I am meant to be doing a Gazette piece in Moldova (with a side visit to Transnistria) in June of this year

    Which reminds me that I was scheduled in late 2021 to go to Odessa in April 2022. And then the war happened

    True story
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    This is clear from some of the not so subtle messaging from Sadiq Khan. Labour's forthcoming victory will further embolden him and others of his persuasion.
    Although to win a majority labour needs these areas as much as it needs the big cities.
    I'm thinking more of what will happen after, rather than before, the election.

    Khan has bee a mediocre mayor at best. It is utterly bizarre that the Tories chose Susan Hall as their candidate. She is his best chance of holding on.

    CCHQ does not want to play by the rules. Unfortunately, its record at putting its thumb on the scale is mixed, to say the least. Susan Hall is Mayoral candidate after a failed attempt to rig the selection process for a Cameroon candidate who withdrew. We've already mentioned photo ID, and it
    lost the Brexit referendum after making it harder for Labour-leaning young people to vote.
    What are your thoughts about the extension of the registration period ahead of the Brexit vote?

    Internal party stuff is just that

    But the kind of allegations you make are close relatives of Trump’s approach: “they stole the election”

  • Options
    MJWMJW Posts: 1,395

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    What’s new. Areas like this have been on their own and left to wither for decades now anyway. Treated with barely disguised contempt by politicians across all parties.

    It was a major driver of the leave vote in these areas. Economic boom post crash. What economic boom. Areas like these never enjoyed it.

    Had prosperity been spread more evenly we would have never voted leave. Still, we did, and remainers need to get over it.
    The Remanian independence argument strikes me as being the sort of argument a toddler uses: ‘if we can’t have what I want, I’m taking my toys and going home’
    In that sense, it's rather similar to Brexit. Both share a similar logic and destructiveness.
  • Options
    TresTres Posts: 2,256

    IanB2 said:

    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.

    Isn't LauraK. the gold standard?
    she's useless, only good for repeating tory spin lines verbatim.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 33,251
    Shot



    Chaser

    @PippaCrerar
    Kemi Badenoch hits out at Tory plotters for “stirring” by suggesting she could replace Rishi Sunak, telling @bbclaurak that PMs “cannot be treated as disposable”.

    Oh...
  • Options
    OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,198

    Matthew Syed excellent, as usual, in The Sunday Times today - he is also very concerned about the Wokery:

    "The cultural retreat can be seen in other ways, too: in the drift towards lived experience rather than objective reality, the obsession with cat videos, the willingness to heatedly disagree on trivial matters such as whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation — an exemplar of what the British anthropologist Ernest Crawley called “the narcissism of minor differences”.

    We have also spent an inordinate amount of time trashing our own nations and histories, which would have been fine if the debate had been conducted with nuance and wisdom. But the cartoon indictments of the West rarely take account of what we might call the plausible counterfactual: how would the world have looked if the Islamists, Bolsheviks or genocidal Chinese Communist Party had been in charge? The West, in this context, can be seen as the world’s greatest blessing, not its greatest curse. Yet it raises the question: why would youngsters today fight for a system they’ve been taught to despise?"


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/decadence-has-sapped-our-defences-we-need-more-than-military-service-qj55t3llf

    Are cat videos woke?
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Leon said:

    Weirdly, I am meant to be doing a Gazette piece in Moldova (with a side visit to Transnistria) in June of this year

    Which reminds me that I was scheduled in late 2021 to go to Odessa in April 2022. And then the war happened

    True story

    I'd get cracking. It might all be over by June if that Leon is correct.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,878

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    Very frustrating - especially given that this looks like being one of the most sensational England victories of all time.
    Oh dear. You just had to say it didn't you?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,880

    IanB2 said:

    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.

    Isn't LauraK. the gold standard?
    Kay Burley is better
    Victoria Derbyshire better still.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    This is clear from some of the not so subtle messaging from Sadiq Khan. Labour's forthcoming victory will further embolden him and others of his persuasion.
    Although to win a majority labour needs these areas as much as it needs the big cities.
    I'm thinking more of what will happen after, rather than before, the election.

    Khan has bee a mediocre mayor at best. It is utterly bizarre that the Tories chose Susan Hall as their candidate. She is his best chance of holding on.

    CCHQ does not want to play by the rules. Unfortunately, its record at putting its thumb on the scale is mixed, to say the least. Susan Hall is Mayoral candidate after a failed attempt to rig the selection process for a Cameroon candidate who withdrew. We've already mentioned photo ID, and it
    lost the Brexit referendum after making it harder for Labour-leaning young people to vote.
    What are your thoughts about the extension of the registration period ahead of the Brexit vote?

    Internal party stuff is just that

    But the kind of allegations you make are close relatives of Trump’s approach: “they stole the election”

    Cameron could have added, as they did in Scotland for SindyRef, 16 to 18 year old voters. But he didn't because he knew he was going to win without them. Because he was a serial winner.


    The difference is "They will steal the election and here's the evidence"
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,607

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    This is clear from some of the not so subtle messaging from Sadiq Khan. Labour's forthcoming victory will further embolden him and others of his persuasion.
    Although to win a majority labour needs these areas as much as it needs the big cities.
    I'm thinking more of what will happen after, rather than before, the election.

    Khan has bee a mediocre mayor at best. It is utterly bizarre that the Tories chose Susan Hall as their candidate. She is his best chance of holding on.

    CCHQ does not want to play by the rules. Unfortunately, its record at putting its thumb on the scale is mixed, to say the least. Susan Hall is Mayoral candidate after a failed attempt to rig the selection process for a Cameroon candidate who withdrew. We've already mentioned photo ID, and it
    lost the Brexit referendum after making it harder for Labour-leaning young people to vote.
    What are your thoughts about the extension of the registration period ahead of the Brexit vote?

    Internal party stuff is just that

    But the kind of allegations you make are close relatives of Trump’s approach: “they stole the election”

    The extension of the registration period was of course an attempt to undo what they'd done, once they realised its implications.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    We miss Andrew Neil on mornings like this; if we must have a right-wing interviewer at least give us one who is good at it.

    Isn't LauraK. the gold standard?
    Kay Burley is better
    Victoria Derbyshire better still.
    Is she right-wing though?
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,021

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    Very frustrating - especially given that this looks like being one of the most sensational England victories of all time.
    Oh dear. You just had to say it didn't you?
    Not just me. This is the current BBC headline: 'Brilliant England charge towards famous win as India collapse'.
  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,802
    edited January 28

    Matthew Syed excellent, as usual, in The Sunday Times today - he is also very concerned about the Wokery:

    "The cultural retreat can be seen in other ways, too: in the drift towards lived experience rather than objective reality, the obsession with cat videos, the willingness to heatedly disagree on trivial matters such as whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation — an exemplar of what the British anthropologist Ernest Crawley called “the narcissism of minor differences”.

    We have also spent an inordinate amount of time trashing our own nations and histories, which would have been fine if the debate had been conducted with nuance and wisdom. But the cartoon indictments of the West rarely take account of what we might call the plausible counterfactual: how would the world have looked if the Islamists, Bolsheviks or genocidal Chinese Communist Party had been in charge? The West, in this context, can be seen as the world’s greatest blessing, not its greatest curse. Yet it raises the question: why would youngsters today fight for a system they’ve been taught to despise?"


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/decadence-has-sapped-our-defences-we-need-more-than-military-service-qj55t3llf

    Are cat videos woke?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kGpohEpuTE


    MAGA rap. Posted for interest, not as an endorsement.
  • Options
    MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 25,393
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    We will always have a safe house for you here in the Vale of Glamorgan should the mood darken.

  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,878

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    Very frustrating - especially given that this looks like being one of the most sensational England victories of all time.
    Oh dear. You just had to say it didn't you?
    Not just me. This is the current BBC headline: 'Brilliant England charge towards famous win as India collapse'.
    If like me you are limited to live text updates ESPNcricinfo is the fastest:

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/england-in-india-2023-24-1389386/india-vs-england-1st-test-1389399/live-cricket-score
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,335

    Tory MPs are shaving their beards off because they have have been told it is a turn off to voters
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/25548637/tory-mps-shaving-beard-turn-off-voters/

    If you hurry, you can get 14/1 against a Conservative majority government.

    Therese Coffey should be ok but maybe she should get the Braun out just in case.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,152
    On Moldova, Romania, the Baltics etc.

    Putin knows the best battle is one you win without fighting. In Georgia and Ukraine, he tried political interference to get his political friends into power, or to get those countries to do what he wanted. When that failed, he invaded. I'd class them as punishment beatings.

    Politics is often about offers - what a party is offering to the population. In the case of pro-EU parties, those offers might include greater prosperity, less (sadly, not no) corruption, and less 'traditional' lifestyles.

    Russia cannot politically beat that offer, which is one reason so many countries in Eastern Europe looked west in the 1990s and 2000s rather than east.

    But the punishment beating Ukraine is getting gives pro-Russian (visibly, and invisibly) politicians, another powerful offer: they can say that NATO and the EU won't protect them from Russia, and that's because NATO and the EU don't 'care' for your country. Therefore best to cozy up with Vlad - which, of course, is the natural state of things... And what's the point of women, going to work, or greater prosperity, if war means you're homeless or dead?

    And there's a sub-message for the powerful and influential: back pro-Russia candidates, and some of that filthy lucre from corruption will head your way.

    These offers will not appeal to everyone; they just need to appeal to enough people. And they don't even have to be explicitly stated; it can just be subliminally messaged: "Peace matters!"

    Putin does not need to win on the battlefield; he can win politically. And the US (and to a lesser extent NATO) are actually helping him do that at the moment.
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    Taz said:
    Clearly a genuine cry for help and not a fabricated letter from the editorial office in Bouverie Street.

    Do they still have editorial offices in Bouverie Street? No answers please, I don't care.
    The question she answers is different and valid.
  • Options
    Clutch_BromptonClutch_Brompton Posts: 426
    edited January 28
    On topic - the best way to halt the movement to Scottish independence is to have a Westminster Govt that has a clue what it is doing. Also they had better be clean shaven or else!
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,963

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    Funding cuts, and the increased cost of coverage over the last decade.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,615
    ...
    Scott_xP said:

    Shot



    Chaser

    @PippaCrerar
    Kemi Badenoch hits out at Tory plotters for “stirring” by suggesting she could replace Rishi Sunak, telling @bbclaurak that PMs “cannot be treated as disposable”.

    Oh...

    That's good, it won't be her then. She speaks well but is fairly useless.
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,688

    Matthew Syed excellent, as usual, in The Sunday Times today - he is also very concerned about the Wokery:

    "The cultural retreat can be seen in other ways, too: in the drift towards lived experience rather than objective reality, the obsession with cat videos, the willingness to heatedly disagree on trivial matters such as whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation — an exemplar of what the British anthropologist Ernest Crawley called “the narcissism of minor differences”.

    We have also spent an inordinate amount of time trashing our own nations and histories, which would have been fine if the debate had been conducted with nuance and wisdom. But the cartoon indictments of the West rarely take account of what we might call the plausible counterfactual: how would the world have looked if the Islamists, Bolsheviks or genocidal Chinese Communist Party had been in charge? The West, in this context, can be seen as the world’s greatest blessing, not its greatest curse. Yet it raises the question: why would youngsters today fight for a system they’ve been taught to despise?"


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/decadence-has-sapped-our-defences-we-need-more-than-military-service-qj55t3llf

    Hands up all those who have had a heated disagreement on whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation. Thought not.
  • Options
    TazTaz Posts: 11,366
    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    Most younger Romanians have moved west in search of better prospects. So what sort of fight they’d put up, shorn of many younger people, would be inadequate.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    We will always have a safe house for you here in the Vale of Glamorgan should the mood darken.

    If - when - it all kicks off I’m probably safer in Cambodia than almost anywhere else. Who cares about tiny Cambodia? Its not strategic, it has no military value and no great natural resources worth plundering

    Possibly even safer than Glamorgan, TBH

    But I am grateful for the offer
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,242
    edited January 28
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    If you want that photo of a mirror you need to send me an email address that works.

    Mine is info@cyclefree.co.uk.

  • Options
    TazTaz Posts: 11,366
    On housing, from the FT. The graphic makes it clear that London and the South East s8mply are not building enough homes for the demand.

    Meanwhile areas in the north and midlands are building, in some cases, too many.

    It is hard to see how labour can really do anything about this to reverse it in the next Parliament.

    https://x.com/sam_dumitriu/status/1746830581428564014?s=61&t=s0ae0IFncdLS1Dc7J0P_TQ
  • Options
    mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,155
    kjh said:

    Matthew Syed excellent, as usual, in The Sunday Times today - he is also very concerned about the Wokery:

    "The cultural retreat can be seen in other ways, too: in the drift towards lived experience rather than objective reality, the obsession with cat videos, the willingness to heatedly disagree on trivial matters such as whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation — an exemplar of what the British anthropologist Ernest Crawley called “the narcissism of minor differences”.

    We have also spent an inordinate amount of time trashing our own nations and histories, which would have been fine if the debate had been conducted with nuance and wisdom. But the cartoon indictments of the West rarely take account of what we might call the plausible counterfactual: how would the world have looked if the Islamists, Bolsheviks or genocidal Chinese Communist Party had been in charge? The West, in this context, can be seen as the world’s greatest blessing, not its greatest curse. Yet it raises the question: why would youngsters today fight for a system they’ve been taught to despise?"


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/decadence-has-sapped-our-defences-we-need-more-than-military-service-qj55t3llf

    Hands up all those who have had a heated disagreement on whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation. Thought not.
    "Objective reality" or as he should have said "my lived experience" the massive twerp. They really should teach some philosophy in PPE.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,976
    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who are the people? Is 'apparently sensible' doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence?
    The Swedish government?


    Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism

    It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, “

    https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240118-sweden-s-call-for-population-to-prepare-for-war-sparks-panic-and-criticism
    This wouldn't be happening without serious intelligence of bad intentions.

    FWIW, I think it's actually about us all rearming sufficiently to deter Putin, so a war never happens.
    Nah, it's being driven by American Republicans stopping further aid to Ukraine and the prospect of Trump in the White House.

    They are doing exactly what Putin asks of them. I really cannot understand why @Sandpit supports them rather than Biden, who was Ukraines staunchest supporter.
    Most of the Republican objections to Ukraine aren’t so much about Ukraine itself, but the amounts of money that Biden is claiming to be spending there - the vast majority of which isn’t real new money at all, but overvaluing of old surplus military kit.

    I think that a change of government in the US changes little actually on the ground in Ukraine, but changes a lot in terms of Washington talking points.

    Personally I wouldn’t have a clue who to vote for in the US, all of the politicians are either far to the right, far to the left, or nakedly in it to enrich themselves. There’s almost no-one who appears to be in politics to make life better for the people they represent.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Cyclefree said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    If you want that photo of a mirror you need to send me an email address that works.

    Mine is info@cyclefree.co.uk.

    That didn’t work?!

    Hmm. Odd. Let me check. Soz
  • Options
    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who is going to do the fighting, and what are they going to be fighting over? All my lads are fighting age, I'll be loading them up in my van and driving off somewhere neutral!
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Cyclefree said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How can Russia get troops to Transnistra? It controls neither the sea nor the air to it.
    A fair point. But transnistria provides an excellent base from which to attack Moldova - if Putin so desires and if he can get his troops there

    The Moldovan army has 6000 men. Putin wouldn’t need entire divisions to overwhelm the country. Also, after what we’ve all witnessed in Ukraine there’s a good chance the country might simply surrender rather than lose thousands of young men against a vastly stronger enemy

    It’s not in NATO and I very much doubt NATO would send in troops to save it

    But Putin has to first assemble a force in Transnistria; which as you say would not be plain sailing
    The transport and supply problems for Rusdia are insurmountable. Far easier for Ukraine to defeat Transnistra.

    Romania would probably intervene if Moldova was seriously threatened. 42% of Moldovans (including their PM) and 75% or Romanians want reunification.

    No, I don’t believe for a moment that Romania would invade and fight Russian troops directly

    Indeed, the Americans would surely stop them, as that would be a hot NATO v Russia conflict
    I wouldn't dismiss a Putin Russia emboldened by Trump, but you really need to dry those pants.
    lol

    I’m sitting in a Japanese restaurant in Bangkok airport drinking a small bottle of excellent sake. I’ve had a brilliant weekend with friends and now I’m heading back to sunny Phnom Penh. I’m in a highly benign mood, not cowering in some bunker

    But the war stuff is fascinating
    If you want that photo of a mirror you need to send me an email address that works.

    Mine is info@cyclefree.co.uk.

    Apologies I gave you the wrong addy!

    Its smoothsnakeleon@gmail.com
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,435
    edited January 28
    Independence is driven by a number of factors but an important one is that Scotland elects damn few Tories and yet gets Tory governments because the English vote differently.

    It is no coincidence that Salmond, a supremely competent politician, contrived to have the referendum when there was a Tory government or that Better Together was led by a Labour politician.

    A Labour government with nearly half the seats in Scotland will defuse the Independence issue for a while, very probably the next decade. It will be a government that Scots have voted for.

    Independence will indeed not go away and when the Tories regain power in the mid to late 2030s it may well come back. But right now the danger has passed.
  • Options
    bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,896
    Sandpit said:

    Foxy said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Who are the people? Is 'apparently sensible' doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence?
    The Swedish government?


    Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism

    It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, “

    https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240118-sweden-s-call-for-population-to-prepare-for-war-sparks-panic-and-criticism
    This wouldn't be happening without serious intelligence of bad intentions.

    FWIW, I think it's actually about us all rearming sufficiently to deter Putin, so a war never happens.
    Nah, it's being driven by American Republicans stopping further aid to Ukraine and the prospect of Trump in the White House.

    They are doing exactly what Putin asks of them. I really cannot understand why @Sandpit supports them rather than Biden, who was Ukraines staunchest supporter.
    Most of the Republican objections to Ukraine aren’t so much about Ukraine itself, but the amounts of money that Biden is claiming to be spending there - the vast majority of which isn’t real new money at all, but overvaluing of old surplus military kit.

    I think that a change of government in the US changes little actually on the ground in Ukraine, but changes a lot in terms of Washington talking points.

    Personally I wouldn’t have a clue who to vote for in the US, all of the politicians are either far to the right, far to the left, or nakedly in it to enrich themselves. There’s almost no-one who appears to be in politics to make life better for the people they represent.
    A Trump Presidency means zero US aid for Ukraine.
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How, precisely, does Russia get meaningful numbers of soldiers and equipment there?

  • Options
    Taz said:

    On housing, from the FT. The graphic makes it clear that London and the South East s8mply are not building enough homes for the demand.

    Meanwhile areas in the north and midlands are building, in some cases, too many.

    It is hard to see how labour can really do anything about this to reverse it in the next Parliament.

    https://x.com/sam_dumitriu/status/1746830581428564014?s=61&t=s0ae0IFncdLS1Dc7J0P_TQ

    and even if they were to fix this, the economic boost would be in areas that do nothing to level up, in fact, it would make the divide larger
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    Good morning, everyone.

    Worth remembering Ukraine was easily defeated in 2014. They then spent years planning and training to make themselves militarily more resilient.

    Russia's future military interventions will also not be made with its 2022 military system and approach.

    That’s simply not true.

    They were pushed back and then the war bogged down but they were never defeated
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,242
    edited January 28

    "UNRWA claims: UN agency condemns aid halt over alleged help for Hamas attacks"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68119268

    "It is shocking to see a suspension of funds to the agency in reaction to allegations against a small group of staff, especially given the immediate action that UNRWA took by terminating their contracts and asking for a transparent independent investigation. "

    There's so much to be said about this, little of it good. Sacking staff *before* an investigation sort-of prejudices the investigation, doesn't it? And what are the terms of the investigation - is it just into the specific direct allegations, or more into the way UNRWA was working in Gaza? And on the other hand, is it valid to stop funds to an organisation that is apparently doing so much good, even if some of what its staff do is bad?

    It’s a suspension of funds not the stopping of them permanently. The suspicion is that those who were sacked are scapegoats.

    UNRWA vehicles were used by the Oct 7 terrorists. That requires cooperation. The question is how high the rot goes.

    It was also pretty disturbing to hear UNRWA’s spokeswoman on the radio this morning describing the suspension of funds as a “collective punishment” for the Palestinian people. That’s a very specific term in this context.

    It wasn't just vehicles. There are allegations that hostages were held in the homes of UNRWA officials.

    There is a further issue which is this: if there are close links between UNRWA and Hamas then governments cannot fund the former if that means funds reach Hamas, as it is a proscribed terrorist organisation. Doing so would be a criminal offence.

    That will be one reason why payment of money has been suspended until it is clear that nothing which goes to UNRWA will go to Hamas. Establishing that would be a challenging investigation in any circumstances, but particularly at the moment.

    There are other UN agencies which help Palestinian civilians so it is not the case that they will remain without assistance. At least I very much hope so.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626
    Relatedly, more drumbeats


    “Finland goes to the polls as border tensions with Russia rise”

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/28/finland-goes-to-the-polls-as-border-tensions-with-russia-rise
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,976
    darkage said:

    Matthew Syed excellent, as usual, in The Sunday Times today - he is also very concerned about the Wokery:

    "The cultural retreat can be seen in other ways, too: in the drift towards lived experience rather than objective reality, the obsession with cat videos, the willingness to heatedly disagree on trivial matters such as whether cooking jerk chicken amounts to cultural appropriation — an exemplar of what the British anthropologist Ernest Crawley called “the narcissism of minor differences”.

    We have also spent an inordinate amount of time trashing our own nations and histories, which would have been fine if the debate had been conducted with nuance and wisdom. But the cartoon indictments of the West rarely take account of what we might call the plausible counterfactual: how would the world have looked if the Islamists, Bolsheviks or genocidal Chinese Communist Party had been in charge? The West, in this context, can be seen as the world’s greatest blessing, not its greatest curse. Yet it raises the question: why would youngsters today fight for a system they’ve been taught to despise?"


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/decadence-has-sapped-our-defences-we-need-more-than-military-service-qj55t3llf

    Are cat videos woke?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kGpohEpuTE


    MAGA rap. Posted for interest, not as an endorsement.
    That’s actually been #1 on the iTunes chart for the past couple of days. Ben Shapiro is much better known as a conservative cultural comenator than a rapper.

    There’s been a handful of these songs released by conservatives over the last year or so, and they almost always go very high in the charts for a few days, because it doesn’t actually take many sales (as opposed to streams) to get to #1 any more.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,435

    On topic - the best way to halt the movement to Scottish independence is to have a Westminster Govt that has a clue what it is doing. Also they had better be clean shaven or else!

    Being clean shaven is a necessary but not sufficient criteria. Both Liz Truss and Nicola Sturgeon demonstrate the point.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,626

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Are we actually going to war with Putin?

    It seems utterly ridiculous, but a lot of apparently sensible people are raising the alarm

    Emboldened by his man Trump's victory, a new Russian empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok must be the ambition.

    We might be OK because Trump has assets in Aberdeenshire and Turnberry. Maybe the UK and Ireland become the 51st and 52nd states.
    Putin is an old man in a hurry. He’s getting closer to a kind of victory in Ukraine

    If he achieves it, will he stop there? Why should he stop there? He’s turned Russia into a wartime economy and he might as well continue now, he faces no more major internal threats it seems

    Georgia next? The Baltics? Moldova?

    The concern must be that this is all co-ordinated with China. Attack the west from multiple directions so America’s might is divided. Put a choke on Taiwan, destabilise the Middle East, march into chisinau

    Hm

    Moldova looking pretty shaky to be honest. I can certainly see him rolling tanks in there.
    there's no land borders from Russia/Belarus into Moldova (it would need to cross Ukrainian territory by some margin).
    Transnistria waves Hello


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria
    How, precisely, does Russia get meaningful numbers of soldiers and equipment there?

    A valid point raised by @Foxy

    However I was responding to a claim that there is no Russian/belarus border with Moldova. There absolutely IS - Transnistria is basically Russia

    A friend of mine went there last summer and said they are more Russian than the Russians (he knows Russia well)

    But yes Putin would have to quietly get troops there. A series of fake civilian flights maybe? Moving equipment would be harder
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131
    MJW said:

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    What’s new. Areas like this have been on their own and left to wither for decades now anyway. Treated with barely disguised contempt by politicians across all parties.

    It was a major driver of the leave vote in these areas. Economic boom post crash. What economic boom. Areas like these never enjoyed it.

    Had prosperity been spread more evenly we would have never voted leave. Still, we did, and remainers need to get over it.
    The Remanian independence argument strikes me as being the sort of argument a toddler uses: ‘if we can’t have what I want, I’m taking my toys and going home’
    In that sense, it's rather similar to Brexit.
    Both share a similar logic and destructiveness.
    Not really

    Brexit was a question put to the British demos: do you want to continue to be a signatory to the Treaty of Rome or not. It was entirely in the letter and the spirit of the Treaty.

    Remainia is a threat to break the demos because they lost the vote
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 7,131

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    This is clear from some of the not so subtle messaging from Sadiq Khan. Labour's forthcoming victory will further embolden him and others of his persuasion.
    Although to win a majority labour needs these areas as much as it needs the big cities.
    I'm thinking more of what will happen after, rather than before, the election.

    Khan has bee a mediocre mayor at best. It is utterly bizarre that the Tories chose Susan Hall as their candidate. She is his best chance of holding on.

    CCHQ does not want to play by the rules. Unfortunately, its record at putting its thumb on the scale is mixed, to say the least. Susan Hall is Mayoral candidate after a failed attempt to rig the selection process for a Cameroon candidate who withdrew. We've already mentioned photo ID, and it
    lost the Brexit referendum after making it harder for Labour-leaning young people to vote.
    What are your thoughts about the extension of the registration period ahead of the Brexit vote?

    Internal party stuff is just that

    But the kind of allegations you make are close relatives of Trump’s approach: “they stole the election”


    The extension of the registration period was of course an attempt to undo what they'd done, once they realised its implications.
    Ah.

    So anything done that you think favours the other side is done deliberately and with ill intent to “steal the election”. And anything that favours your side is just and with moral intent to “right the balance”.

    Got it.

    See the problem with these accusations? They just undermine the democratic system in the west and play into the hands of the likes of Trump. We have a good system. It’s not perfect but it’s a damn sight better than the alternative
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,615
    Our foreign policy seems very disjointed and counterproductive. We realise China is a threat, yet we don't even have reciprocal tariffs on their goods when they place them on ours to advantage their own industries. Through Net Zero we close our own businesses and offshore manufacturing to China, where they burn coal and sell stuff back to us. Many of us also get the screaming abdabs when Liz Truss decides to visit Taiwan like it's the end of the world. We happily join every war going whilst diminishing our fighting capacity to zilch. What's the point of it? It feels like the deliberate running down of a business before its assets are stripped. We seem to be the country equivalent of BHS.
  • Options
    TresTres Posts: 2,256

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    This is clear from some of the not so subtle messaging from Sadiq Khan. Labour's forthcoming victory will further embolden him and others of his persuasion.
    Although to win a majority labour needs these areas as much as it needs the big cities.
    I'm thinking more of what will happen after, rather than before, the election.

    Khan has bee a mediocre mayor at best. It is utterly bizarre that the Tories chose Susan Hall as their candidate. She is his best chance of holding on.

    CCHQ does not want to play by the rules. Unfortunately, its record at putting its thumb on the scale is mixed, to say the least. Susan Hall is Mayoral candidate after a failed attempt to rig the selection process for a Cameroon candidate who withdrew. We've already mentioned photo ID, and it
    lost the Brexit referendum after making it harder for Labour-leaning young people to vote.
    What are your thoughts about the extension of the registration period ahead of the Brexit vote?

    Internal party stuff is just that

    But the kind of allegations you make are close relatives of Trump’s approach: “they stole the election”


    The extension of the registration period was of course an attempt to undo what they'd done, once they realised its implications.
    Ah.

    So anything done that you think favours the other side is done deliberately and with ill intent to “steal the election”. And anything that favours your side is just and with moral intent to “right the balance”.

    Got it.

    See the problem with these accusations? They just undermine the democratic system in the west and play into the hands of the likes of Trump. We have a good system. It’s not perfect but it’s a damn sight better than the alternative
    The tories have been quite clear about their motivations for fiddling around with electoral registration. So blame them for undermining the democratic system, not the people calling them out for it.
  • Options
    Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 2,774
    The dilemma facing any separatist government at Holyrood is whether to govern well and make people satisfied or to govern badly and try to blame Westminster. A unionist government would not face this problem, but the existence of a strong separatist block would focus their attention. In Wales, with no serious independence sentiment, a unionist government can rule as badly as humanly possible and still hope to be re-elected.
  • Options

    119-6 India still over 100 runs short. Just saying ...

    Make that 119-7. This is sensational!
    Why is the cricket not on the bloody radio?

    I want an answer, Thomas.
    It is - Talksport 2. Pretty poor commentary, though.
    Yeah, I've tried that before. It's pants.

    Think I'll just sit here and sulk.
  • Options
    CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 40,039
    DavidL said:

    On topic - the best way to halt the movement to Scottish independence is to have a Westminster Govt that has a clue what it is doing. Also they had better be clean shaven or else!

    Being clean shaven is a necessary but not sufficient criteria. Both Liz Truss and Nicola Sturgeon demonstrate the point.
    It's also somewhat discriminatory even where males are concerned. But maybe the Tories are fishing for another woke war.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,537

    MJW said:

    Taz said:

    Agreed on this. As someone who has never liked the SNP and still doesn't, I think the issue of Scottish independence is seperate and distinct from the politicians making the case for it. When I was growing up in Scotland I was a unionist but if I had a vote now it would probably be for independence. It would be very difficult economically in the short to medium term but I think Scotland is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from the United Kingdom to achieve its long term potential.

    Given that it appears to be Groundhog Referendum Day on PB, Remainia is falling well short of where it could be as a country and needs to break free from Leavistan to achieve its long term potential.

    Bye bye Barnsley and Bolsover, good luck on your own.
    What’s new. Areas like this have been on their own and left to wither for decades now anyway. Treated with barely disguised contempt by politicians across all parties.

    It was a major driver of the leave vote in these areas. Economic boom post crash. What economic boom. Areas like these never enjoyed it.

    Had prosperity been spread more evenly we would have never voted leave. Still, we did, and remainers need to get over it.
    The Remanian independence argument strikes me as being the sort of argument a toddler uses: ‘if we can’t have what I want, I’m taking my toys and going home’
    In that sense, it's rather similar to Brexit.
    Both share a similar logic and destructiveness.
    Not really

    Brexit was a question put to the British demos: do you want to continue to be a signatory to the Treaty of Rome or not. It was entirely in the letter and the spirit of the Treaty.

    Remainia is a threat to break the demos because they lost the vote
    Nevertheless, ultimately what matters is getting to the best position for the country. Which isn't where we are.
This discussion has been closed.