politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If Ladbroke punters have this right CON is heading for a wi
The standard assumption is that this is mostly down to the boundaries is wrong. Yes LAB does get some benefit but the key factor is different turnout levels in CON and LAB seats. Shadsy of Ladbrokes gets this right in in his blog:-
Comments
-
Possibly ....0
-
"The worry for Labour is that a victory in this manner will be portrayed as unfair and lead to claims that it lacks legitimacy."
I'll be too busy popping the champers.0 -
The funniest outcome is if this is combined with a Scottish Yes vote.0
-
Betfair, maj:
No maj 2.28
Lab maj 3.3
Con maj 3.7
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/market?marketId=1.101416490
Betfair, most seats:
Lab 1.95
Con 2.04
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/market?marketId=1.101416490#/exchange/market?marketId=1.101416473&eventTypeId=23789610 -
Quite so, and the prospect of such an outcome would considerably reinforce a Yes vote, which in turn would, after indy, reinforce it still more ...Pulpstar said:The funniest outcome is if this is combined with a Scottish Yes vote.
While on the subject of elections and therefore their strategists I was absolutely fascinated to discover that John McTernan (he of the Scottish Labour defeat inter aliis) was not only once a librarian but argued in favour of closing libraries (back in 2011, but I missed it at the time).
http://wingsoverscotland.com/we-need-to-talk-about-john/
0 -
Betfair:
Mexico 6/5
Cameroon 29/10
Draw 11/5
Spain 4/5
Netherlands 9/2
Draw 12/5
Chile 1/2
Australia 8/1
Draw 16/5
https://www.betfair.com/sport0 -
I've been tipping this bet for months.0
-
"If Ladbroke punters have this right CON is heading for a win on votes – LAB on seats"
Actually no. The Ladbrokes markets don't imply that at all.
The individual Seats/Votes markets imply that it is very finely balanced, with Con having a small advantage in expected votes and Lab in expected seats. That is not the same thing as implying that CON is heading for a win on votes, LAB on seats. In fact the Most Votes/Most Seats doubles imply that there's a greater than 83% chance that that won't be the outcome. Most of the probability space is accounted for by either Lab or Con having both most seats and most votes.0 -
I do wonder if UKIP picking up votes/second places in Labour strongholds is going to make this issue even more pronounced.0
-
Reports of clashes between ISIS and the Kurdish Peshmerga.0
-
Its too early, most people will not bother betting on the election until Christmas.0
-
I'd say UKIP is almost guaranteed to come second in Labour seats like Rotherham and Hartlepool given the local election results.TheScreamingEagles said:I do wonder if UKIP picking up votes/second places in Labour strongholds is going to make this issue even more pronounced.
0 -
Punters frequently get it wrong. That is why others like Shadsy enjoy a comfortable lifestyle.0
-
God I'm bored. I'm sitting in the lounge in Copenhagen waiting for my flight home. The cricket is boring (after tea) and I can't drink any more beer or they won't let me on the flight.0
-
I think ISIS will find that the Kurds but up rather more of a fight than the Iraqi army.RodCrosby said:Reports of clashes between ISIS and the Kurdish Peshmerga.
0 -
It is amusing to see all the Danish advert pop ups on the site though0
-
Jordan strikes with his third ball in Test cricket.0
-
Well the other inevitable has happened:RodCrosby said:Reports of clashes between ISIS and the Kurdish Peshmerga.
RAGreeneCNN @RAGreeneCNN · 27m
#Iran troops in #Iraq means: US and Iran are about to be military allies ... against Sunni extremists ... in Iraq. #UnintendedConsequences?0 -
If you back £100 of Con Most Votes @ 5-6 and £100 of Labour Most seats @ 4-5
Con Votes +83
Lab Votes -100
Lab Seats +80
Con Seats -100
Con Votes, Con Seats = -17
Lab Votes, Lab Seats = -20
Con Votes, Lab Seats = +163
Giving you ~ 8-1 for your money - as the Lab Votes/Con Seats has been ruled out pretty much by the Ashcroft poll.
Or just stake £3.03 on Lab Votes/Con Seats - though this is surely > 66-1 with the Ashcroft polling.0 -
I think this is the first time the USA has allied itself with an enemy since the Soviet Union in WW2.0
-
Right. What Ladbrokes' prices imply is that Con most votes Lab most seats is the median expected outcome, in terms of vote share. i.e. a Tory lead of c. 1.5% on votes.Richard_Nabavi said:"If Ladbroke punters have this right CON is heading for a win on votes – LAB on seats"
Actually no. The Ladbrokes markets don't imply that at all.
The individual Seats/Votes markets imply that it is very finely balanced, with Con having a small advantage in expected votes and Lab in expected seats. That is not the same thing as implying that CON is heading for a win on votes, LAB on seats. In fact the Most Votes/Most Seats doubles imply that there's a greater than 83% chance that that won't be the outcome. Most of the probability space is accounted for by either Lab or Con having both most seats and most votes.0 -
The 5-1 here is poor value, unless you have a very, very high cost of capital0
-
He is a vile creature pimping himself on any newspaper or TV station that will have him.Carnyx said:
Quite so, and the prospect of such an outcome would considerably reinforce a Yes vote, which in turn would, after indy, reinforce it still more ...Pulpstar said:The funniest outcome is if this is combined with a Scottish Yes vote.
While on the subject of elections and therefore their strategists I was absolutely fascinated to discover that John McTernan (he of the Scottish Labour defeat inter aliis) was not only once a librarian but argued in favour of closing libraries (back in 2011, but I missed it at the time).
http://wingsoverscotland.com/we-need-to-talk-about-john/0 -
@Pulpstar - You might be able to do a smidgen better than that because both Bet365 and Stan James offer 10/11 on Lab Most Seats, although Stan James doesn't actually lay any bets as far as I know.0
-
The Netherlands are 5.8 with Betfair. Seems a bit high to me.
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/football/market?id=1.112173612&exp=e0 -
What would ISIS think of switching on the TV and seeing William Hague, John Kerry and Lara Croft standing on a platform together?0
-
Yeah right. No one batted an eyelid when Labour got a working majority after being 2.8% ahead of the Tories in 2005, whereas the Tories couldn't after being 7% ahead in 2010.Pulpstar said:"The worry for Labour is that a victory in this manner will be portrayed as unfair and lead to claims that it lacks legitimacy."
I'll be too busy popping the champers.
I'm still hoping for the ludicrous spectacled of a coalition of the 2nd and 4th largest vote winners with half their seats in Scotland leaving as they declare independence.0 -
Why take the 5/1 when the "middle" pays 8.9/1 - or as big as 13.4/1 using the 10/11 available elsewhere? If you're really worried you can cover on the 66/1.
Actually, 13.4/1 looks pretty fair for a lead range of maybe 2-3%...
EDIT: I see Pulpstar has already done the maths here...0 -
Obama is about to make a statement on Iraq.
(not high hopes)0 -
OT. Those who thought Farage was trying to undermine Helmer by having him stand (and lose) at the Newark By-election will perhaps have to rethink their position. Farage has stood down as head of the UKIP delegation of MEPs in Brussels in favour of Helmer.0
-
Hmm - related to a story yesterday, perhaps?Richard_Tyndall said:Farage has stood down as head of the UKIP delegation of MEPs in Brussels in favour of Helmer.
0 -
The West aren't really serious about foreign policy any more?AndyJS said:What would ISIS think of switching on the TV and seeing William Hague, John Kerry and Lara Croft standing on a platform together?
0 -
BBC reporting a Liverpool Labour councillor has resigned over Ed's photo with the Sun. Not sure if that's as a Cllr or from the party.0
-
The party:ToryJim said:BBC reporting a Liverpool Labour councillor has resigned over Ed's photo with the Sun. Not sure if that's as a Cllr or from the party.
And a Labour councillor in Liverpool, Martin Cummins, has resigned from the party, suggesting Mr Miliband had "listened to unwise counsel in associating himself, and our party, with this degrading publication".
Mr Cummins said: "Seeing Ed promoting the Sun has rocked me to my core."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27829958
Seems a bizarre thing to get het up over after all those years when Labour and the Sun were bosom buddies, but there we go.
0 -
Obama looking crushed. Just mouthing the words of his speech...0
-
Nope he did it at the beginning of the week.Richard_Nabavi said:
Hmm - related to a story yesterday, perhaps?Richard_Tyndall said:Farage has stood down as head of the UKIP delegation of MEPs in Brussels in favour of Helmer.
Besides when you take away the stupid spin from 'I'm not interested in facts' AveryLP, you are left with Farage having declared everything to the EU who were, after all, the authority responsible for the funds.0 -
Idiot. Good ridence Mr CumminsRichard_Nabavi said:
The party:ToryJim said:BBC reporting a Liverpool Labour councillor has resigned over Ed's photo with the Sun. Not sure if that's as a Cllr or from the party.
And a Labour councillor in Liverpool, Martin Cummins, has resigned from the party, suggesting Mr Miliband had "listened to unwise counsel in associating himself, and our party, with this degrading publication".
Mr Cummins said: "Seeing Ed promoting the Sun has rocked me to my core."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27829958
Seems a bizarre thing to get het up over after all those years when Labour and the Sun were bosom buddies, but there we go.0 -
Hodges latest Ed is crap blog
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100276327/dont-blame-ed-milibands-advisers-for-his-sun-shambles-blame-ed/0 -
£110 staked at Bet365 @ 10-11 Labour Seats;Richard_Nabavi said:@Pulpstar - You might be able to do a smidgen better than that because both Bet365 and Stan James offer 10/11 on Lab Most Seats, although Stan James doesn't actually lay any bets as far as I know.
£114.55 at Ladbrokes @ 5-6 Conservative Votes
Yields £14.55 @ 13.43-1 Labour Seats, Conservative votes.0 -
Done the maths and placed the appropriate bets.Tissue_Price said:Why take the 5/1 when the "middle" pays 8.9/1 - or as big as 13.4/1 using the 10/11 available elsewhere? If you're really worried you can cover on the 66/1.
Actually, 13.4/1 looks pretty fair for a lead range of maybe 2-3%...
EDIT: I see Pulpstar has already done the maths here...0 -
The tectonic plates are moving in the Middle East, - quickly enough to qualify as an earthquake.
I think the losers are going to be the Saudis/extremist Sunnis.
The US support for Saudi has always been awkward, given the source of 9/11, human rights and lack of democracy in Saudi. The only reason for US Saudi support has been US dependence on Saudi oil. But with fracking that is changing fast. The US has to decide which side it is on - Sunni or Shia. (This all goes back to Muhammad's lack of a will explaining who his successor should be - moral: leave a will). Sunnis make up nearly 90% of Muslims but Shias are the majority in Iran and Iraq and are sizable in Lebanaon and Pakistan.
I predict a covert alliance between US, Russia and Iran on the side of Shia to bring stability to the Middle East. The winners are Assad (pressure off), Iran (welcome to the club), Russia (welcome back but please behave) and the millions of innocent inhabitants of Iraq and Syria under extremist Sunni terrorist threat (and elsewhere).
Consequences are that Saudi seeks nuclear weapons (and becomes the new Iran with international sanctions) Investors in oil shares do well, but arms suppliers to Saudi do not.
Israel will need to make a quick reassessment but it has been a covert ally of Iran in the past and might welcome stability on its borders, and an Iran/US normalisation of relations will bring better predicitability.
0 -
Maybe he is calculating he has nothing to gain by pulling out the Bush/Cheney chestnuts from the fire.RodCrosby said:
Obama looking crushed. Just mouthing the words of his speech...
0 -
13.4/1 looks like value. Bet365's price is under Betfair's (just). The logic is that the 5/6 Con Most Votes is even better value.Pulpstar said:
£110 staked at Bet365 @ 10-11 Labour Seats;Richard_Nabavi said:@Pulpstar - You might be able to do a smidgen better than that because both Bet365 and Stan James offer 10/11 on Lab Most Seats, although Stan James doesn't actually lay any bets as far as I know.
£114.55 at Ladbrokes @ 5-6 Conservative Votes
Yields £14.55 @ 13.43-1 Labour Seats, Conservative votes.0 -
It also seems that Dan Hannan has finally accepted what many of us have known for a long time. Cameron is not seeking and will not get any significant renegotiation of the EU competencies prior to the referendum and will recommend we stay in based on the position as it is now.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100276242/david-cameron-has-dropped-the-idea-of-a-new-deal-the-referendum-will-be-on-the-existing-membership-terms/?fb
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?0 -
S&P makes Osborne's weekend as it removes negative outlook to AAA rating http://t.co/VXx47WxYYY0
-
DH may be repetitive, but to be fair to him, Ed does keep on validating his thesis.ToryJim said:0 -
Presumably he'd have had some notice or at least an indication in advance of the EC announcement.Richard_Tyndall said:
Nope he did it at the beginning of the week.
Besides when you take away the stupid spin from 'I'm not interested in facts' AveryLP, you are left with Farage having declared everything to the EU who were, after all, the authority responsible for the funds.
As for your second point, maybe. An alternative take on it is that either he was profiting personally - nothing wrong with that, perhaps, except it makes him a massive hypocrite - or alternatively that he was telling the truth and these funds were used as an undeclared contribution to UK political campaigning ('banks of computers').
It may not be a big deal in the overall scheme of things, and it may be entirely innocent. That doesn't mean it's not exceptionally embarrassing for a party which pretends to be cleaner than the others.
0 -
Glorious yellow boxes incoming :')TGOHF said:S&P makes Osborne's weekend as it removes negative outlook to AAA rating http://t.co/VXx47WxYYY
0 -
It's somewhat odd to declare imminent defeat before you've even suited up for the joust. I for one won't just take Hannan as gospel, I'm still going to see what happens.Richard_Tyndall said:It also seems that Dan Hannan has finally accepted what many of us have known for a long time. Cameron is not seeking and will not get any significant renegotiation of the EU competencies prior to the referendum and will recommend we stay in based on the position as it is now.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100276242/david-cameron-has-dropped-the-idea-of-a-new-deal-the-referendum-will-be-on-the-existing-membership-terms/?fb
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?0 -
I remember the speech Jimmy Carter gave after the failure of 'Operation Eagle Claw' - not a pleasant thing to see a grown man having to do.RodCrosby said:Obama looking crushed. Just mouthing the words of his speech...
0 -
ISIS movie of them doing drivebys, executions, snipers, detonating IEDs, beheadings, door-to-door death squads, etc...(WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC)
http://observers.france24.com/content/20140613-hollywood-fim-jihadist-propaganda-isis0 -
Being rational people, they'll wait and see, rather than speculating on the unknown outcome of negotiations which either haven't started at all, or if they have, are taking place in complete secrecy.Richard_Tyndall said:
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?
Although I'm a great fan of Dan Hannan - the thinking man's BOOer - I was puzzled by that particular article, because he didn't explain what he thought had actually changed.
0 -
Well as I said not high hopes.
Obama said that Iraq needs to have political reform first before any military aid, but will give full diplomatic support to them and opened the door for Iran to help.0 -
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this partRichard_Nabavi said:
Being rational people, they'll wait and see, rather than speculating on the unknown outcome of negotiations which either haven't started at all, or if they have, are taking place in complete secrecy.Richard_Tyndall said:
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?
Although I'm a great fan of Dan Hannan - the thinking man's BOOer - I was puzzled by that particular article, because he didn't explain what he thought had actually changed.
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.0 -
Well, quite. Hannan is that rare thing: a rational BOOer.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this part
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.0 -
On Obama:
What is the value of full diplomatic support when your capital is attacked by the enemy?
This is essentially Obama's statement:
pic.twitter.com/aurWkgc0YH0 -
Just bought and put on a cycling top, size 2xl.
Makes you realise just how skinny the average cyclist is !0 -
You seem to be getting very excited. It's Fukushima all over again.RodCrosby said:ISIS movie of them doing drivebys, executions, snipers, detonating IEDs, beheadings, door-to-door death squads, etc...(WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC)
http://observers.france24.com/content/20140613-hollywood-fim-jihadist-propaganda-isis0 -
Liverpool Labour councillor Martin Cummins has resigned the whip in protest at Ed's Sun photo.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-labour-councillor-martin-cummins-7266443#.U5skvvBTAKI.twitter0 -
You forgot the next Tory PM in 2020.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this partRichard_Nabavi said:
Being rational people, they'll wait and see, rather than speculating on the unknown outcome of negotiations which either haven't started at all, or if they have, are taking place in complete secrecy.Richard_Tyndall said:
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?
Although I'm a great fan of Dan Hannan - the thinking man's BOOer - I was puzzled by that particular article, because he didn't explain what he thought had actually changed.
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.0 -
My God Ed looks weak today. It is pitiful.0
-
Anyone who had followed UKIP's rise (and I accept that many would not have so I am not saying that as a criticism) would know that in the mid 2000's there was a huge stink in the pary precisely because of the cost of running those computerised systems based in Kent for targeting new members.Richard_Nabavi said:
Presumably he'd have had some notice or at least an indication in advance of the EC announcement.Richard_Tyndall said:
Nope he did it at the beginning of the week.
Besides when you take away the stupid spin from 'I'm not interested in facts' AveryLP, you are left with Farage having declared everything to the EU who were, after all, the authority responsible for the funds.
As for your second point, maybe. An alternative take on it is that either he was profiting personally - nothing wrong with that, perhaps, except it makes him a massive hypocrite - or alternatively that he was telling the truth and these funds were used as an undeclared contribution to UK political campaigning ('banks of computers').
It may not be a big deal in the overall scheme of things, and it may be entirely innocent. That doesn't mean it's not exceptionally embarrassing for a party which pretends to be cleaner than the others.
Many in the party (including myself) felt it was not money well spent no matter what the source and it led to the resignation of a number of senior members who had challenged Farage over it and fell foul of his rather unique management style (and yes I am using a polite way of saying he behaved like a dictatorial git).
So the question of whether or not they existed was settled a decade ago.
Much as I would like to see Farage replaced as head of UKIP I can't see how this will change anyone's mind given that the Electoral Commission is already seen by many as anti-UKIP and incompetent to boot. Those who dislike UKIP will see their bias confirmed and those who dislike the Electoral Commission in its current form and who think there is an ongoing establishment witch-hunt against UKIP will see their own bias confirmed.
Electorally it will make no difference unless it is used internally to dump Farage in which case it will probably help UKIP in the long run.
0 -
Well Fukushima and the Tsunami are the worst and most documented disasters in human history.TheWatcher said:
You seem to be getting very excited. It's Fukushima all over again.RodCrosby said:ISIS movie of them doing drivebys, executions, snipers, detonating IEDs, beheadings, door-to-door death squads, etc...(WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC)
http://observers.france24.com/content/20140613-hollywood-fim-jihadist-propaganda-isis0 -
And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.Richard_Nabavi said:
Well, quite. Hannan is that rare thing: a rational BOOer.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this part
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.
0 -
Well he is rational enough to see that Edonomics plus no referendum is significantly worse for the entire country than a Con govt and a referendum - so he won't be going anywhere as long as there is a referendum in the next parly.Richard_Tyndall said:
And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.Richard_Nabavi said:
Well, quite. Hannan is that rare thing: a rational BOOer.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this part
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.
Contrast with you - gagging to foist Ed on us for 5 years "for the greater good" - no thanks !0 -
Hannan won't realise that, because it is not true. If we stay in the EU, it will either be because Cameron doesn't get a majority (or isn't able to put together some other arrangement) so there's no referendum, or the referendum is lost by the BOOers.Richard_Tyndall said:And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.
Indeed I have had this very conversation with Dan Hannan. He is under no illusion that the Out side will have to make a strong case - and to my mind, he personally does make a strong case - and that it won't necessarily be easy for them to win. But he also accepts that if voters don't accept that case, then that is their decision. He's a democrat, and would accept that. He just wants the chance to put the case, and he wants the voters to decide. That's an entirely honourable position.
0 -
Funny fact, the leader of ISIS Abu Bakr al Baghdadi has a masters an a phd, so we should call him Dr. Baghdadi (so like Dr.Evil not to anger him spending all those years at Evil University for people to call him mr.Thankyouverymuch ).0
-
Not wishing to give in to hyperbole as it is a hard job, but either the refs are getting their fair share of groaners out early in this world cup, or the quality of the decisions will be very poor indeed. 2 valid goals not even close to being hard to determine ruled out by the officials in the first half alone of Mexico v Cameroon.0
-
Good evening, everyone.
Mr. kle4, done a post about stuff we learnt about Inquisition at E3. Not sure if you're too fussed (it's light on spoilers) but in case you're interested, it's here: http://thaddeusthesixth.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/dragon-age-inquisition-e3-news.html0 -
Of course if I were gagging to foist Ed on you it would indeed only be for 5 years. You on the other hand are gagging to foist ever closer union with the EU on to the rest of us permanently.TGOHF said:
Well he is rational enough to see that Edonomics plus no referendum is significantly worse for the entire country than a Con govt and a referendum - so he won't be going anywhere as long as there is a referendum in the next parly.Richard_Tyndall said:
And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.Richard_Nabavi said:
Well, quite. Hannan is that rare thing: a rational BOOer.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this part
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.
Contrast with you - gagging to foist Ed on us for 5 years "for the greater good" - no thanks !0 -
Populus Online:
Lab 35
Con 32
UKIP 15
LibDem 8
Green 50 -
No, nobody has noticed because of theSouthamObserver said:My God Ed looks weak today. It is pitiful.
squirrelsfootball. Bobafett says so.
*Checks beeb website to see which is the most read story of the day*
0 -
Presumably they mean in the next five years. However, that chance is ridiculously slim anyway. It's absurd people like Richard Nabavi feel we should throw the entire momentum of the eurosceptic movement, UKIP on the crux of entering parliament, for that small chance. Well it would be absurd if you ignore the fact that such people are arch-Tory loyalists, and UKIP voluntarily throwing in their hand would benefit their party massively.Speedy said:
You forgot the next Tory PM in 2020.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this partRichard_Nabavi said:
Being rational people, they'll wait and see, rather than speculating on the unknown outcome of negotiations which either haven't started at all, or if they have, are taking place in complete secrecy.Richard_Tyndall said:
I wonder how many of those Tories on here who said they would wait and see what came out of the negotiations will now accept the answer to that is nothing and will therefore back BOO?
Although I'm a great fan of Dan Hannan - the thinking man's BOOer - I was puzzled by that particular article, because he didn't explain what he thought had actually changed.
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.0 -
LadbrokesPromos @LadbrokesPromos 1mkle4 said:Not wishing to give in to hyperbole as it is a hard job, but either the refs are getting their fair share of groaners out early in this world cup, or the quality of the decisions will be very poor indeed. 2 valid goals not even close to being hard to determine ruled out by the officials in the first half alone of Mexico v Cameroon.
3 DISALLOWED GOALS?: It's 6/1 for Dos Santos to have another one ruled out! D
pic.twitter.com/wGMzpOQsSF0 -
Much appreciated! Have been meaning to catch up on the various E3 news. Can't say the idea of more crafting interests me - if I want to play Elder Scrolls I will play Elder Scrolls - but I do love the world building of Dragon Age. Qunari who are not 'Qunari', interesting.Morris_Dancer said:Good evening, everyone.
Mr. kle4, done a post about stuff we learnt about Inquisition at E3. Not sure if you're too fussed (it's light on spoilers) but in case you're interested, it's here: http://thaddeusthesixth.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/dragon-age-inquisition-e3-news.html0 -
It is indeed true. Now I know that ever closer union within the EU doesn't actually bother you that much but I certainly don't look forward to it.Richard_Nabavi said:
Hannan won't realise that, because it is not true. If we stay in the EU, it will either be because Cameron doesn't get a majority (or isn't able to put together some other arrangement) so there's no referendum, or the referendum is lost by the BOOers.Richard_Tyndall said:And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.
Indeed I have had this very conversation with Dan Hannan. He is under no illusion that the Out side will have to make a strong case - and to my mind, he personally does make a strong case - and that it won't necessarily be easy for them to win. But he also accepts that if voters don't accept that case, then that is their decision. He's a democrat, and would accept that. He just wants the chance to put the case, and he wants the voters to decide. That's an entirely honourable position.
There is a simple answer to all of this.
Can you envisage any way in which Cameron will come back from his 'negotiations' and say "we didn't get enough, I recommend we leave the EU".
Alternatively can you envisage him coming back and saying "we didn't get enough but I recommend we stay in".
If you cannot see Cameron adopting either of those positions (and I certainly cannot) then the referendum is a sham. Cameron along with Labour and the Lib Dems will campaign for us to stay in no matter what the result of the negotiations and will make sure that the message is we got a good deal to back up their position.
The real question the is what you and the rest of the Cameroon loyalists will do.0 -
Why are they playing this World Cup Match in Manchester, it is peeing it down.0
-
Tim Gatt @TimGattITV 1m
Beckenbanned MT @itvnews Ex-Germany coach Franz Beckenbauer banned from 'all football activity' for 90 days by Fifa http://bit.ly/UzB9oA0 -
He's not allowed to watch the World Cup?TheScreamingEagles said:Tim Gatt @TimGattITV 1m
Beckenbanned MT @itvnews Ex-Germany coach Franz Beckenbauer banned from 'all football activity' for 90 days by Fifa http://bit.ly/UzB9oA0 -
Not sure.RobD said:
He's not allowed to watch the World Cup?TheScreamingEagles said:Tim Gatt @TimGattITV 1m
Beckenbanned MT @itvnews Ex-Germany coach Franz Beckenbauer banned from 'all football activity' for 90 days by Fifa http://bit.ly/UzB9oA0 -
Bloody Frogs, always causing trouble.
The former France coach Raymond Domenech has said the current Les Bleus side is “partially responsible” for the bloodshed in Ukraine.
France beat Ukraine 3-0 in the second leg of the World Cup play-off in November last year to pull off a thrilling 3-2 aggregate victory and qualify for the World Cup in Brazil. According to Domenech, the turnaround was such a shock to the Ukrainian people that it paved the way for the crisis situation currently engulfing the country.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jun/13/france-world-cup-playoff-ukraine-crisis-raymond-domenech0 -
Is he mental?TheScreamingEagles said:Bloody Frogs, always causing trouble.
The former France coach Raymond Domenech has said the current Les Bleus side is “partially responsible” for the bloodshed in Ukraine.
France beat Ukraine 3-0 in the second leg of the World Cup play-off in November last year to pull off a thrilling 3-2 aggregate victory and qualify for the World Cup in Brazil. According to Domenech, the turnaround was such a shock to the Ukrainian people that it paved the way for the crisis situation currently engulfing the country.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jun/13/france-world-cup-playoff-ukraine-crisis-raymond-domenech
0 -
All Blacks 1/8 to win tomorrow (at PP)? Really?
I've backed the draw at 28/1.
Iraq? If no one had invaded and Saddam had had a heart attack last week this is just about where we would be by now. Except without the US heavy weaponry.0 -
Mr. kle4, I really like the world-building as well.
There was a little more to the Iron Bull, but I deleted it as it was a bit more spoilerish [not huge, but I prefer to err on the side of caution].
Quite glad of the Inquisitor voice choices. Have to see who the Yankee doodles are.
At least one area is bigger than the whole of Origins, which is rather enormous. I tend to quite like crafting, but we'll see how it works.0 -
Why are you so scared of a referendum ?Richard_Tyndall said:
Of course if I were gagging to foist Ed on you it would indeed only be for 5 years. You on the other hand are gagging to foist ever closer union with the EU on to the rest of us permanently.TGOHF said:
Well he is rational enough to see that Edonomics plus no referendum is significantly worse for the entire country than a Con govt and a referendum - so he won't be going anywhere as long as there is a referendum in the next parly.Richard_Tyndall said:
And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.Richard_Nabavi said:
Well, quite. Hannan is that rare thing: a rational BOOer.TheScreamingEagles said:
We should keep on reminding Kippers of that Hannan article, for only this part
....Plus, obviously, he [Cameron] represents our one chance of a referendum on leaving the EU.
Contrast with you - gagging to foist Ed on us for 5 years "for the greater good" - no thanks !0 -
Lib Dems lengthening in Colchester (LD Maj = 6,982)
LD 2/9 (from 1/5)
Con 3/1 (from 7/2)
UKIP 33/1 (from 66/1)
Lab 50/1 (n/c)0 -
Fill his street with cans and arrest the Hun if he kicks one.TheScreamingEagles said:Tim Gatt @TimGattITV 1m
Beckenbanned MT @itvnews Ex-Germany coach Franz Beckenbauer banned from 'all football activity' for 90 days by Fifa http://bit.ly/UzB9oA0 -
Well if they score a mighty 6% they can kiss it bye bye like 40 plus of their other seatsStuart_Dickson said:Lib Dems lengthening in Colchester (LD Maj = 6,982)
LD 2/9 (from 1/5)
Con 3/1 (from 7/2)
UKIP 33/1 (from 66/1)
Lab 50/1 (n/c)
0 -
Lib Dems lengthening in North Cornwall (LD Maj = 2,981)
LD 4/5 (from 4/6)
Con EVS (from 11/10)
UKIP 25/1 (from 33/1)
100 bar0 -
Richard has remained notably aloof when you ask him what the minimum level of repatriation/reform needed would be for him to feel we should stay in the EU. It's almost like he's waiting for the official position of the Tory party.Richard_Tyndall said:
It is indeed true. Now I know that ever closer union within the EU doesn't actually bother you that much but I certainly don't look forward to it.Richard_Nabavi said:
Hannan won't realise that, because it is not true. If we stay in the EU, it will either be because Cameron doesn't get a majority (or isn't able to put together some other arrangement) so there's no referendum, or the referendum is lost by the BOOers.Richard_Tyndall said:And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.
Indeed I have had this very conversation with Dan Hannan. He is under no illusion that the Out side will have to make a strong case - and to my mind, he personally does make a strong case - and that it won't necessarily be easy for them to win. But he also accepts that if voters don't accept that case, then that is their decision. He's a democrat, and would accept that. He just wants the chance to put the case, and he wants the voters to decide. That's an entirely honourable position.
There is a simple answer to all of this.
Can you envisage any way in which Cameron will come back from his 'negotiations' and say "we didn't get enough, I recommend we leave the EU".
Alternatively can you envisage him coming back and saying "we didn't get enough but I recommend we stay in".
If you cannot see Cameron adopting either of those positions (and I certainly cannot) then the referendum is a sham. Cameron along with Labour and the Lib Dems will campaign for us to stay in no matter what the result of the negotiations and will make sure that the message is we got a good deal to back up their position.
The real question the is what you and the rest of the Cameroon loyalists will do.
I also believe he once said that if the bonus cap went through on the financial sector he'd support leaving. I asked him once about this, and I think his response was that he's waiting to see if it will be repatriated by Cameron.0 -
Indeed. I imagine if I don't care to do much with that aspect it won't be mandatory, and I'm prepared to give the developers the benefit of the doubt on testing out new features for their consistent high quality of output, and the companion stuff, usually among the best thing Bioware do I think, is already piquing my interest. Good stuff.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. kle4, I really like the world-building as well.
There was a little more to the Iron Bull, but I deleted it as it was a bit more spoilerish [not huge, but I prefer to err on the side of caution].
Quite glad of the Inquisitor voice choices. Have to see who the Yankee doodles are.
At least one area is bigger than the whole of Origins, which is rather enormous. I tend to quite like crafting, but we'll see how it works.
0 -
Lib Dems lengthening in South East Cornwall (Con Maj = 3,220)
Con 1/8 (n/c)
LD 11/2 (from 9/2)
UKIP 20/1 (from 25/1)
100 bar0 -
England's declaration was incorrect I think - we should have tried to push over 600.
The game is essentially all about the follow on. If Sri Lanka avoid it, they draw.0 -
Alistair Carmichael is charging £20 to hear him defend the No campaign.
twitter.com/WingsScotland/status/477400576675041280/photo/10 -
The idea that people could think that the EU would make any significant, substantive offering in such scenario is, to put it mildly, extremely optimistic I think. It's a try not to make it any worse situation for those either positively for or resignedly for staying in, not actually fixing things. I see no evidence the EU bureaucracy would think there is something to fix that would necessitate making concession to the UK or anyone else.Richard_Tyndall said:
There is a simple answer to all of this.Richard_Nabavi said:
Hannan won't realise that, because it is not true. If we stay in the EU, it will either be because Cameron doesn't get a majority (or isn't able to put together some other arrangement) so there's no referendum, or the referendum is lost by the BOOers.Richard_Tyndall said:And I wonder at what point Hannan will realise that Cameron will keep us in the EU no matter what. His position within the Tory party will become untenable before we reach referendum day.
Indeed I have had this very conversation with Dan Hannan. He is under no illusion that the Out side will have to make a strong case - and to my mind, he personally does make a strong case - and that it won't necessarily be easy for them to win. But he also accepts that if voters don't accept that case, then that is their decision. He's a democrat, and would accept that. He just wants the chance to put the case, and he wants the voters to decide. That's an entirely honourable position.
Can you envisage any way in which Cameron will come back from his 'negotiations' and say "we didn't get enough, I recommend we leave the EU".0 -
I think you'll find his job as a public servant doesn't include political activities.old_labour said:Alistair Carmichael is charging £20 to hear him defend the No campaign.
twitter.com/WingsScotland/status/477400576675041280/photo/10