Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

The Pennsylvania count looks set to go onto into next week but punters are convinced Biden’s won – p

24

Comments

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited November 2020

    LOL.

    Trump will no longer receive special Twitter treatment if he loses election.

    Policy that protects ‘newsworthy individuals’ from having accounts banned for breaking rules wouldn’t apply to Trump.


    Donald Trump could lose more than just the presidency this January. Twitter has confirmed that, if Trump leaves office, he will no longer receive special treatment as a “newsworthy individual”.

    Twitter’s policy around newsworthiness protects certain people – such as elected officials with more than 250,000 followers – from having their accounts suspended or banned for rule infractions that would otherwise lead to severe penalties.

    That policy is what has led to the company muting, but not removing, at least 12 tweets from the US president over the past week that cast doubt on the democratic process.

    But, Twitter has confirmed, the policy does not apply to former elected officials. They have to follow the same rules as everyone else, and if a tweet breaks those rules, it gets removed. Were Trump to continue breaking Twitter’s rules regularly post-presidency, his account could be suspended.

    “Twitter’s approach to world leaders, candidates and public officials is based on the principle that people should be able to choose to see what their leaders are saying with clear context,” a spokesman told the Guardian. “This means that we may apply warnings and labels, and limit engagement to certain Tweets. This policy framework applies to current world leaders and candidates for office, and not private citizens when they no longer hold these positions.”

    That will present Trump with a choice once he leaves office: either tone down the rhetoric or face the prospect of his hugely influential following being taken away from him.


    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/06/donald-trump-twitter-rules-newsworthy-election

    I think it would be very unwise to un-person trump. Just let him scream like a child and do the moderate thing on anything really crazy.
    There's a real danger his tweets lead to actual violence.
    So could unpersoning him. If he calls for violent revolution sure he has to go, but if it more of the same its all the fake news media are horrid nonsense, just ignore him.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,426
    edited November 2020

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    That's just everyday sexism from you.

    Have you forgotten HYUFD's posts in 2017 about Marine Le Pen winning the first round?
  • Options

    Scott_xP said:
    Has there ever been so dramatic a fall from grace as that of Giuliani?
    Anakin Skywalker.
    But he did redeem himself in Return of the Jedi (1983) by killing Palpatine.

    Still not sure why Disney Star Wars resurrected Palpatine in 2019!
  • Options
    Right, I'm giving up for the day. Watch it be called in the next hour.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Latest popular votes:

    Biden 73,877,903
    Trump 70,005,972

    https://results.decisiondeskhq.com

    So DD have called the whole election for Biden?
    They have
    Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AZ but has given up on NV and PA, in terms of the count. Hoping for the recount in GA to deliver. After that it’s in the courts.
    I have an awful feeling that by the middle of next week we're going to be hearing that Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AK but hopes for a second recount in GA and maybe the courts can help and otherwise maybe an asteroid will collide with earth or the aliens will come or something.
  • Options

    Right, I'm giving up for the day. Watch it be called in the next hour.

    I went to bed an hour ago, and I'm still fixated by this election.
  • Options
    Scott_xP said:
    A hard act to follow?
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    Scott_xP said:
    Has there ever been so dramatic a fall from grace as that of Giuliani?
    Giuliani has always been a fuckstick. He was part of the New York cop riot.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
    Did you actually read my post?
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277
    Looks like the number of ballots that landed in the 3 day grace window is tiny. Just 1k for Pittsburgh.

    https://twitter.com/lauren_llee/status/1324845113525284869
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    That's just everyday sexism from you.

    Have you forgotten HYUFD's posts in 2017 about Marine Le Pen winning the first round?
    I will have you know if France had used a completely different electoral system then Le Pen won the whole thing.
  • Options

    LOL.

    Trump will no longer receive special Twitter treatment if he loses election.

    Policy that protects ‘newsworthy individuals’ from having accounts banned for breaking rules wouldn’t apply to Trump.


    Donald Trump could lose more than just the presidency this January. Twitter has confirmed that, if Trump leaves office, he will no longer receive special treatment as a “newsworthy individual”.

    Twitter’s policy around newsworthiness protects certain people – such as elected officials with more than 250,000 followers – from having their accounts suspended or banned for rule infractions that would otherwise lead to severe penalties.

    That policy is what has led to the company muting, but not removing, at least 12 tweets from the US president over the past week that cast doubt on the democratic process.

    But, Twitter has confirmed, the policy does not apply to former elected officials. They have to follow the same rules as everyone else, and if a tweet breaks those rules, it gets removed. Were Trump to continue breaking Twitter’s rules regularly post-presidency, his account could be suspended.

    “Twitter’s approach to world leaders, candidates and public officials is based on the principle that people should be able to choose to see what their leaders are saying with clear context,” a spokesman told the Guardian. “This means that we may apply warnings and labels, and limit engagement to certain Tweets. This policy framework applies to current world leaders and candidates for office, and not private citizens when they no longer hold these positions.”

    That will present Trump with a choice once he leaves office: either tone down the rhetoric or face the prospect of his hugely influential following being taken away from him.


    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/06/donald-trump-twitter-rules-newsworthy-election

    I think it would be very unwise to un-person trump. Just let him scream like a child and do the moderate thing on anything really crazy. Unpersoning him just makes him a martyr and feds into thr narrative twitter are bias / happy to censor certain people and not others.
    Of course they "censor" (let use their platform) only certain people. They kick off the ones who repeatedly dont comply with their hateful conduct policy, unless they are a key elected official. Others are fine.

    Entirely appropriate for a private business, the expectation businesses should pander to aggressive nutters and let them damage their reputation and therefore shareholder value is very anti capitalist.
  • Options
    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362

    Scott_xP said:
    A hard act to follow?
    They’ve probably been up for days now.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
    That is what he just said.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
    That is what he just said.
    If you expect him to be able to read properly then you have higher expectations than me.
  • Options
    Chris said:

    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Latest popular votes:

    Biden 73,877,903
    Trump 70,005,972

    https://results.decisiondeskhq.com

    So DD have called the whole election for Biden?
    They have
    Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AZ but has given up on NV and PA, in terms of the count. Hoping for the recount in GA to deliver. After that it’s in the courts.
    I have an awful feeling that by the middle of next week we're going to be hearing that Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AK but hopes for a second recount in GA and maybe the courts can help and otherwise maybe an asteroid will collide with earth or the aliens will come or something.
    Feels like one of those 80s slasher movies. The monster needs to be killed a couple of times, because it finds miraculous ways of coming back.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
    Did you actually read my post?
    Yes and in the last few days you've cited examples of fraud which are rebutted in that thread.
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623
    By the time this is called Biden will be riding in with the covid vaccine in one hand and the secrets to cold fusion in the other.
  • Options

    I think we can all put the idea of vote rigging to bed. The BBC did an article on it and none of the signs of vote rigging happened in this election:

    Delay in announcing results
    Too many voters
    A high turnout in specific areas
    Large numbers of invalid votes
    More votes than ballot papers issued
    Results that don't match

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

    Read this thread, I noticed you posted a lot of this fake news vote rigging stuff, then buggered off when it was pointed out you were peddling fake news.

    It'll stop you embarrassing yourself further.

    https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1324435797374808066
    That is what he just said.
    Sarcastically, he's been posting for days examples of electoral fraud which are rebutted in that thread then ignoring it and posting new allegations.
    Explain why it is sarcastic.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    edited November 2020

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, Braveheart loving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,058
    Perhaps Trump can claim that a million of his votes have been wrongly redirected to California and counted there, when they should have been counted in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia.
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    Alex Salmond?
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
  • Options
    So this is why the counting is getting delayed so much.

    https://twitter.com/ZcohenCNN/status/1324849482647916544
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121

    Chris said:

    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Latest popular votes:

    Biden 73,877,903
    Trump 70,005,972

    https://results.decisiondeskhq.com

    So DD have called the whole election for Biden?
    They have
    Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AZ but has given up on NV and PA, in terms of the count. Hoping for the recount in GA to deliver. After that it’s in the courts.
    I have an awful feeling that by the middle of next week we're going to be hearing that Fox says RNC still hopes for NC and AK but hopes for a second recount in GA and maybe the courts can help and otherwise maybe an asteroid will collide with earth or the aliens will come or something.
    Feels like one of those 80s slasher movies. The monster needs to be killed a couple of times, because it finds miraculous ways of coming back.
    I seem to remember making exactly that comment last night. Or was it the night before? Or the night before that?
  • Options

    Am I right in thinking that AP and Fox have called Arizona for Biden but none of the other news outlets?

    Confusingly, DecisionDesk have not called AZ but have called PA (which takes Biden over the line).

    Yes, that is correct. The impression is that none of the networks is keen to be first to call the election for Biden, resulting in excessive caution about calling the next state that would tip them over the 270 ECV mark.
  • Options
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).

    The advantage of dragging this out is it gives him less time to do that.
    And I don't think he will. He will revert to learned behaviour. Multiple law suits, whinging and grifting.
    Probably the worst damage will be the amount he and his acolytes trouser.
    Political damage? Nah. He doesn't care.
  • Options
    dixiedean said:

    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).

    The advantage of dragging this out is it gives him less time to do that.
    And I don't think he will. He will revert to learned behaviour. Multiple law suits, whinging and grifting.
    Probably the worst damage will be the amount he and his acolytes trouser.
    Political damage? Nah. He doesn't care.
    I wish that were the case but then I see what he has already done with the civil service in recent weeks.
  • Options
    Apparently Phil Connors will be doing the next presenting shift on CNN.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121
    Alec Baldwin will have enough material for a bloody Oscar tomorrow night.

  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,606

    Am I right in thinking that AP and Fox have called Arizona for Biden but none of the other news outlets?

    Confusingly, DecisionDesk have not called AZ but have called PA (which takes Biden over the line).

    This is why Trump and his team are so furious with Fox News.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,058
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    I seem to remember David Cameron saying after than vote that the voices of England must be heard. What did they have to say about it?
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,981
    Andy_JS said:

    Am I right in thinking that AP and Fox have called Arizona for Biden but none of the other news outlets?

    Confusingly, DecisionDesk have not called AZ but have called PA (which takes Biden over the line).

    This is why Trump and his team are so furious with Fox News.
    Every time someone interviews the Fox/AP Decision Desk they say exactly the same thing: “We have called it. We stand by it. Biden wins Arizona.”
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277
    Biden continuing a near 2-1 split in the Clark mail-ins. Something has to give here surely.

    https://twitter.com/meganmesserly/status/1324854269472694272
  • Options
    22,657 lead for Biden in NV.

    Ridiculous that this hasn't been called yet.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, Braveheart loving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    You ok, hun?

    You know the weather's changed when HYUFD's no longer getting excited by powerful, strong men.

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    I seem to remember David Cameron saying after than vote that the voices of England must be heard. What did they have to say about it?
    England does not have its own Parliament unlike Scotland, so EVEL was perfectly acceptable
  • Options
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,981
    Well I’ve just watched episode two of The Queen’s Gambit - it’s absolutely brilliant.

    I was of course worried that in that time someone would call this game over. But clearly I had no need for such concern.
  • Options
    Mal557Mal557 Posts: 662

    Well I’ve just watched episode two of The Queen’s Gambit - it’s absolutely brilliant.

    I was of course worried that in that time someone would call this game over. But clearly I had no need for such concern.

    Time to watch whole box sets I suspect
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
  • Options
    gealbhangealbhan Posts: 2,362
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    Its cute that you have so neatly transitioned from fictitious Trafalgar polls to push polls.
  • Options
    PA - Biden lead increased again to 14,923 - came from very, very red Mercer County.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121
    edited November 2020
    There is a post on 538 which is a bit difficult to make sense of, but seems to imply that the results of nearly 7000 ballots from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, are about to be published.
  • Options
    Chris said:

    There is a post on 538 which is a bit difficult to make sense of, but seems to imply that the results of nearly 7000 ballots from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, are about to be published.

    CNN just interviewed someone from Allegheny and he did not seem optimistic that they would be. There will be some soon but more likely about 2-3k.
  • Options
    AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,981

    PA - Biden lead increased again to 14,923 - came from very, very red Mercer County.

    Call this fucker.
  • Options
    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    dixiedean said:

    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).

    The advantage of dragging this out is it gives him less time to do that.
    And I don't think he will. He will revert to learned behaviour. Multiple law suits, whinging and grifting.
    Probably the worst damage will be the amount he and his acolytes trouser.
    Political damage? Nah. He doesn't care.
    I wish that were the case but then I see what he has already done with the civil service in recent weeks.
    Yes but that was with the expectation he would win.
    It is no longer of any benefit to Donald J Trump. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see him as political at all. Outwith it being to his advantage.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,334
    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    I'm against splitting up - the world is quite divided enough without further splits in countries that function reasonably well together. But I think that if the Scottish government really wants a new referendum then we shouldn't try to make it illegal (how?). A possible compromise would be to offer an earlier decisive referendum but with a higher threshold than 50%+1 - say 55% for something of that magnitude? (And yes, if we'd had that for Brexit it would have been a good idea.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    edited November 2020
    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective unions of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,586
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,006
    Poor RCP has been in meltdown for the last week even before polling closed, and today their conservative lead article is openly calling for Republican state houses to nullify Democrat wins by appointing Republican electors!
  • Options

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    Got to love a bit of spiffing brit
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,586
    Interesting story from a couple of weeks back.

    Spanish-speaking Latino voters are being bombarded with disinformation ahead of the election
    https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/20/nation/spanish-speaking-latino-voters-are-being-bombarded-with-disinformation-ahead-election/
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    EPG said:

    Poor RCP has been in meltdown for the last week even before polling closed, and today their conservative lead article is openly calling for Republican state houses to nullify Democrat wins by appointing Republican electors!

    RCP's final forecast of Biden 319 and Trump 219 could well however end up being almost spot on, they just wrongly called Florida for Biden and Georgia for Trump

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/2020_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups.html

  • Options
    YokesYokes Posts: 1,200
    The small print around the Trump campaign call for donations to his post election legal effort is a delight.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,735
    edited November 2020

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    It took me awhile, making changes incrementally, but I managed in Democracy 3 the other day to take my USA state and create my religiously run state with zero crime (thanks to universal cctv, machine gun cops, police drones, face recognition technology, removal of jury trial, curfew and arbitrary detention), and eventually the removal of all state pensions and state run healthcare and education. It was also a green utopia.

    I should think the developers will fix that exploit that video used though.
  • Options
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Indeed, nationalism is a good thing to be proud of like patriotism.

    Xenophobia is a bad thing, but that is not nationalism.
  • Options
    dixiedean said:

    dixiedean said:

    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).

    The advantage of dragging this out is it gives him less time to do that.
    And I don't think he will. He will revert to learned behaviour. Multiple law suits, whinging and grifting.
    Probably the worst damage will be the amount he and his acolytes trouser.
    Political damage? Nah. He doesn't care.
    I wish that were the case but then I see what he has already done with the civil service in recent weeks.
    Yes but that was with the expectation he would win.
    It is no longer of any benefit to Donald J Trump. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see him as political at all. Outwith it being to his advantage.
    No I hope you are right, and as I said I asked the question because I simply don't know anything much about the US system in any detail so I do appreciate your informed reply.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    It took me awhile, making changes incrementally, but I managed in Democracy 3 the other day to take my USA state and create my religiously run state with zero crime (thanks to universal cctv, machine gun cops, police drones, face recognition technology, removal of jury trial, curfew and arbitrary detention), and eventually the removal of all state pensions and state run healthcare and education. It was also a green utopia.
    A utopia without pensions?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992
    edited November 2020
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    And the UK can also be built on nationalism behind our great Queen and royal family and Union Jack but a nationalism of unionism not division within these isles
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited November 2020
    PA lead 17,012

    96% of the vote in now.

    Call it already.
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    Got to love a bit of spiffing brit
    He's one of the few "Professional British People" on YT I actually like.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,735

    kle4 said:

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    It took me awhile, making changes incrementally, but I managed in Democracy 3 the other day to take my USA state and create my religiously run state with zero crime (thanks to universal cctv, machine gun cops, police drones, face recognition technology, removal of jury trial, curfew and arbitrary detention), and eventually the removal of all state pensions and state run healthcare and education. It was also a green utopia.
    A utopia without pensions?
    They all had private pensions by that point. Though the poor were not happy with me.
  • Options

    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Indeed, nationalism is a good thing to be proud of like patriotism.

    Xenophobia is a bad thing, but that is not nationalism.
    It's not good or bad, it's just a thing. It causes territories to join together, it causes them to split apart. It helps them stay together, it stops them joining together.
    It's a pretty uncontroversial idea when considered in whole. The fight against nationalism died with Metternich.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,606
    edited November 2020

    PA lead 17,012

    96% of the vote in now.

    Call it already.

    It probably won't be called if it's in the range for an automatic recount.
  • Options
    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    Personally although I can see the advantages of that it would feel a bit too much like the EU trying to keep us in various control mechanisms after Brexit. I suspect it would generate resentment and more strife. So I think it would be better to say that there will be a clean break but then at the same time negotiate joint ventures and cross border cooperation as equal independent partners.

    The problem is this relies upon having a Government in Westminster adult enough to see that once Scotland has chosen independence it is in everyone's interests to make it work as well as possible including making concessions and compromises on the English side. I fear we have neither the politicians (of any party) or the public who are intelligent enough to realise that that is in our best interests.
  • Options
    Some light reading from Paul Krugman in the New York Times:-

    Is America Becoming a Failed State?
    Mitch McConnell may make the nation ungovernable.

    As I write this, it seems extremely likely that Joe Biden has won the presidency. And he clearly received millions more votes than his opponent. He can and should claim that he has been given a strong mandate to govern the nation.

    But there are real questions about whether he will, in fact, be able to govern. At the moment, it seems likely that the Senate — which is wildly unrepresentative of the American people — will remain in the hands of an extremist party that will sabotage Biden in every way it can.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/05/opinion/joe-biden-senate-mitch-mcconnell.html
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121
    Arizona:
    We just received 2,172 additional votes from Arizona. Biden is currently up by 38,455 votes.
  • Options
    anotherex_toryanotherex_tory Posts: 234
    edited November 2020
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Wh
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Whaye
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    What made the UK? Pragmatism.

    What shall unmake the UK? Nationalism.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,770

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    I'm against splitting up - the world is quite divided enough without further splits in countries that function reasonably well together. But I think that if the Scottish government really wants a new referendum then we shouldn't try to make it illegal (how?). A possible compromise would be to offer an earlier decisive referendum but with a higher threshold than 50%+1 - say 55% for something of that magnitude? (And yes, if we'd had that for Brexit it would have been a good idea.
    Should have made it contingent that all 4 UK nations had to vote for Brexit to occur (although it would have caused other problems).
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,992

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    Personally although I can see the advantages of that it would feel a bit too much like the EU trying to keep us in various control mechanisms after Brexit. I suspect it would generate resentment and more strife. So I think it would be better to say that there will be a clean break but then at the same time negotiate joint ventures and cross border cooperation as equal independent partners.

    The problem is this relies upon having a Government in Westminster adult enough to see that once Scotland has chosen independence it is in everyone's interests to make it work as well as possible including making concessions and compromises on the English side. I fear we have neither the politicians (of any party) or the public who are intelligent enough to realise that that is in our best interests.
    If Scotland ever chose independence we would of course treat them exactly as the EU treated us and rightly so, if you choose to leave a union you should not expect any concessions from the larger state you are leaving, if you wish to become a foreign power you will be treated as one
  • Options
    Andy_JS said:

    PA lead 17,012

    96% of the vote in now.

    Call it already.

    It probably won't be called if it's in the range for an automatic recount.
    Why not? Wisconsin was.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,606
    CatMan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    I'm against splitting up - the world is quite divided enough without further splits in countries that function reasonably well together. But I think that if the Scottish government really wants a new referendum then we shouldn't try to make it illegal (how?). A possible compromise would be to offer an earlier decisive referendum but with a higher threshold than 50%+1 - say 55% for something of that magnitude? (And yes, if we'd had that for Brexit it would have been a good idea.
    Should have made it contingent that all 4 UK nations had to vote for Brexit to occur (although it would have caused other problems).
    Wouldn't work when 85% of the population of the UK live in England.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    Personally although I can see the advantages of that it would feel a bit too much like the EU trying to keep us in various control mechanisms after Brexit. I suspect it would generate resentment and more strife. So I think it would be better to say that there will be a clean break but then at the same time negotiate joint ventures and cross border cooperation as equal independent partners.

    The problem is this relies upon having a Government in Westminster adult enough to see that once Scotland has chosen independence it is in everyone's interests to make it work as well as possible including making concessions and compromises on the English side. I fear we have neither the politicians (of any party) or the public who are intelligent enough to realise that that is in our best interests.
    If Scotland ever chose independence we would of course treat them exactly as the EU treated us and rightly so, if you choose to leave a union you should not expect any concessions from the larger state you are leaving, if you wish to become a foreign power you will be treated as one
    In the real world if Scotland ever chose to leave if you want to know how we'd treat them, look at how we treat the Republic of Ireland.

    We are not the EU.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited November 2020
    Mal557 said:

    I hope Bidens speech is long enough to last two days, if it is he will finish about the same time PA will be called and he can end his speech 'oh and by the way I accept the Presidency'

    A little known fact. The reason Chicago is called 'The Windy City' has nothing to do with wind from the lake but because one of their politicians spoke for days in order to fillibuster something or other. Sorry! But last time I was working there I ended up with a free day so took one of their open top bus tours round the city. Apart from The Al Capone stuff that was the most interesting thing.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    dixiedean said:

    dixiedean said:

    Okay, a question for our US experts - perhaps even a suggestion for someone with the knowledge to write a thread header.

    If he turns his mind to it and lives down to his reputation, how much damage to the Presidency, to Government and to the country (short of starting a war) can Trump legally do between now and January?

    Can he salt the earth and make enough mess that it will take Biden his whole presidency to sort it out? Or is he specifically constrained in his actions by being an outgoing president as opposed to a sitting president? (if you see what I mean).

    The advantage of dragging this out is it gives him less time to do that.
    And I don't think he will. He will revert to learned behaviour. Multiple law suits, whinging and grifting.
    Probably the worst damage will be the amount he and his acolytes trouser.
    Political damage? Nah. He doesn't care.
    I wish that were the case but then I see what he has already done with the civil service in recent weeks.
    Yes but that was with the expectation he would win.
    It is no longer of any benefit to Donald J Trump. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see him as political at all. Outwith it being to his advantage.
    No I hope you are right, and as I said I asked the question because I simply don't know anything much about the US system in any detail so I do appreciate your informed reply.
    Not really informed. Just my gut. He could do a lot of damage with Executive Orders. For example he could pardon a bunch of serial killers and set them loose to roam the streets.
    How does this benefit him? No profit in it.
    He could sack everyone at the WH and refuse to sign anything I suppose.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,770
    edited November 2020
    kle4 said:

    kle4 said:

    For something completely different, this is amusing.
    https://youtu.be/AYvxBx4D9Jo

    It took me awhile, making changes incrementally, but I managed in Democracy 3 the other day to take my USA state and create my religiously run state with zero crime (thanks to universal cctv, machine gun cops, police drones, face recognition technology, removal of jury trial, curfew and arbitrary detention), and eventually the removal of all state pensions and state run healthcare and education. It was also a green utopia.
    A utopia without pensions?
    They all had private pensions by that point. Though the poor were not happy with me.
    We need the Vulcans to turn up, then we can create the Federation and have a one world government.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,121
    We just received 437 additional votes from Pennsylvania. Biden is currently up by 16,784 votes. 6m ago
  • Options
    This election is like one of those races in the Olympics, where someone would have broken the world record except another runner crossed the line a tenth of a second earlier.
    Trump is now on nearly 70,000,000 votes, which beats Obama08's 69,498,516. A record! Except, no, "Sleepy" Joe broke the tape before you.

    Have the night off, Mr Trump. You did really well but save your energy now, because you're going to be on trial for the rest of your natural life.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,965

    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Wh
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    Whaye
    Roy_G_Biv said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    gealbhan said:

    gealbhan said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    OnboardG1 said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The one thing the SNP aren't is nativists.
    You Kippers in kilts are in denial about that.
    FPT

    Have a look at the UKIP stats in Scotland and at SNP policy on who gets Scottish passports - not to mention who gets to live in Sciotland at all.

    The SNP{ aren't the ones who scream and shout at other Europeans sitting in Holyrood. Or in Westminster. Hell, the Tories scream and shout at Scots sitting in Westminster.
    Gotta say TSE, with the exception of some of the older school nutters, the SNP are much much less nativist than the Tory part.
    You obviously have not encountered the cybernats
    Now Trump's toast, who's going to be your populist nationalist poster boy?
    I always said I would have voted for Biden but GOP for Congress and I voted Remain, the only nationalist amongst the 2 of us is you and your fellow English hating, ranting, Bannockburn obsessing, saltire waving, whinging, bitter Scottish nationalists!!!
    That told them 😁
    But in the interests of balance though, If Ireland can exist okay out the U.K. in EU, what is the argument an independent Scotland can’t as well?

    But nations need to keep their identity, their culture, their democracy, and where these are smothered by any union with other nations, with so much surrender of your sovereignty into the pool, so some far away government, speaking a language other than your own, now rules over you, you vote and everything stays the same, building up your desire to take back control - something has got to change hasn’t it?

    Are you saying that feeling just made up? Got up by scoundrels? It’s not really real? That there is no excuse to feel that?
    Great post. That is why I am an English supporter of Scottish Independence. For entirely positive and well meant reasons.
    Thank you. 🙂

    Would it be best then to have a conscious decoupling, like via a Royal Commission. So as not to throw out with the change cooperation that really is helpful win win?
    No as Scots voted against independence in 2014 in a once in a generation referendum
    And Brexit doesn’t change that? the desire of majority of English and Welsh, those original Roman Britons, to brexit, can’t have the same powerful Brexit arguments to escape from vassalage, to take back sovereignty and control, turned back upon them in ScotRef2 now because of brexit?
    No, Cameron had said he would hold an EUref even before the indyref in 2014, it was a once in a generation referendum and that will stand.

    Plus the prospect of a hard border with England still keeps Scots behind the Union post Brexit

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/poll-most-scots-would-reject-independence-after-considering-issues-2976093
    I’m sure you agree with Richard and myself, just don’t realise it. It hinges upon understanding what a nation actually is. 🙂

    Can you be part of a nation and not share the same language?

    Can you have members of a Nation outside its borders?

    Does the nation have a border or are you a member through culture?

    if ScotRef2 goes ahead, who is entitled to vote, the Scottish Nation which straddles borders and is anywhere in the world?

    To what degree minorities have to assimilate to culture to have membership and rights?

    What about people without a common territory or economic life, who do not have material prerequisites to form a separate nationstate?
    The UK is older as a nation than Germany, Italy, India, the USA, Canada and Australia, all of them manage to be effective union of states and so can we, otherwise on your absurd argument they should all dissolve too
    What made Italy? Nationalism.
    What made India? Nationalism.
    What made Germany? Nationalism.
    What made the UK? Pragmatism.

    What shall unmake the UK? Nationalism.
    What shall unmake the UK?
    Lack of pragmatism.
This discussion has been closed.