politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » TV ratings: Biden’s convention speech got a bigger audience th

Given that elections at this stage are all about metrics of one form or another we now have the TV audience figures for Trump’s speech overnight which we can compare with Biden’s and the Numbers give the Democrat the edge.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Sadly haunting, I thought
I had a nurse do my flu jab just last year
I'd have thought in 2020 more would be following online than on TV anyway though.
And so we will get to the inevitable privatisation of the BBC, as was the point in this entire story
The guy left for dead aged three, when Hutus attacked him with multiple machete blows.
The South African blade-runner - who trains with a cheetah.
The Italian fencer who lost large chunks of her body to meningitis.
A superb film. Very emotional.
You don't even need to be fantastic at it, when all the experienced guys are in their seventies and desperate to call it a day. Banks are paying the most ridiculous money to keep these guys from retirement, well into the four figure day rates and six figure salaries.
PERFORM A while B=C
or similar...
Time to make the BBC compete on a level playing field with all the media
Trump under 200 IMO.
Maybe Dr Foxy can clarify
He says “we are changing the law so more people can administer the jab. I want pharmacists and nurses and technicians to do it as well as GPS as has traditionally been the case” (from memory)
Changing the law so technicians can do it
GPS are traditional but lots of nurses do it especially where privately administered or tendered out by the nhs
If it produces the content people will subscribe as they do to other subscriptions services
To be more accurate, Trump leads 46.6-45.2. Before the Democrat convention, he led 46.9-44.2 and after the Democrat convention, he led 46.5-45.6 so tiny changes with both Trump and Biden votes solid within the margin of error.
As I suspected, the conventions have made little or no difference (and I suspect the debate won't either). The US electorate is highly polarised and views are entrenched.
Only 3.6% are still undecided which is extraordinary so far from the election.I have no idea how representative the Trafalgar sampling is because I don't know enough about Michigan.
I asked for the nurse but was told it would be the NP
https://twitter.com/drvox/status/1299376200226226176
Does anyone listen to this podcast?
Whether we are there yet or not I am not certain, but I feel like a tipping point is coming on public perceptions of the acceptable role and level of the BBC, and therefore how much the public should pay for it. The attacks it gets from left and right on occasion suggest its status could easily become focused on in a cross partisan way if the public turns.
So the the Express has gone from Cancer! Cure! Now!* stories to COVID! Vaccine! Now! stories.
*One of the ugliest forms of bottom feeding in journalism.
Although viewing figures may not correspond to voting ones, its entirely possible many might have their minds made up, be keen to vote, but have no intention of watching these events.
*Watch out for the price.
Let's have free access for all and not just reduce the quality of what one is able to watch to what one can afford or be prepared to pay for.
Sometimes it's not just about the profit motive - sometimes it's about improving the quality of life for as many people as possible.
I'm surprised more people don't learn it who are doing software eng already (like me) - I'll look into it for sure
https://twitter.com/baseballot/status/1299456850694471680
https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1299389870327115776
11,000 plus pensioners pay just for Lineker and it cannot justify that taxpayers keep it afloat on a public subsidy
Furthermore two thirds of voters want the fee scrapped so not just 'tories'
It means absolutely nothing at all.
Nada. Zero. Zilch.
You have an ideological dislike of the BBC, despite it correcting a clear market failure.
https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1299438111550832640?s=20
In 2016 the republicans got a bigger audience.
I also think Biden will pick up Michigan because it has an above average African American population and there will be higher black turnout this year after BLM and George Floyd etc, though I think Trump will hold Wisconsin as it has a below average African American population
Which is not his forte. A little stilted in delivery but absent the usual extreme batshittery.
https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1299436915012366336?s=20
The BBC have no way of doing that, from what I understand, so if you decriminalise the fee, nothing can happen if you don't pay. You can watch TV forever with no payment.
I support decriminalisation BTW, I just can see the argument that it reduces their income.
Full survey for BBC
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/513507-first-night-of-gop-convention-delivers-nearly-six-times-more-views-than-start
Joanna Pettet was very fetching in her Mata Hari costume!
If you plug an aerial into your TV, the BBC cannot stop you from watching BBC1. I don't see how they can ever stop it unless you have to ring them up to activate it, or some other such method.
You are obsessed with Fox News which is a channel I never watch nor would I anymore than RT
Every other media outlet in the country is about to start running front pages on how that strategy plays out.
https://www.forbes.com/places/wi/#d55ea1223a16
As you say, the death rates are also puzzling. One just has to hope that it's not simply a case of a time-lag.