Undefined discussion subject.
Comments
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualUK/comments/i7ewjf/love_my_new_neighbours_cucks_silently/
Okay which one of you was it0 -
-
If I tell you it was a central London house we bought for the shop staff to use during strikes that’s not going to look good is it...alex_ said:Charles said:
I’ve paid both rent and a mortgage. Does that make me a pleb in your eyes?TheScreamingEagles said:God, I hate it when the aristos tell the plebs what to do.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/1293263729665159169
Pokey one bed apartment in the East Wing?0 -
It's Harris. No surprise there then0
-
Drat. And double drat. I really thought it was going to be Rice.
1 -
Why do I get the feeling that the song and dance about the Dem VP pick has been a bit like that episode of The Thick of It when they're all running around trying to find a new PM but actually the deal was done ages ago?1
-
Discussing the rendition of Trump from his Turnberry bolt hole?kinabalu said:
If it helps about a year ago I had a quite intense vision of "President Harris" landing in the UK on airforce one. It was a windy day and her hair was a problem as she descended. And that was it. The vision ended there. No idea what year it was or the purpose of the visit.DecrepiterJohnL said:
Kamala Harris is now odds-on favourite again. The market is changing faster than I can copy-(reformat)-paste.DecrepiterJohnL said:
I suppose the rational thing to do might be to look at the other candidates if we assume it is a false market on the front two, but can we assume that? Tbh I am thinking of greening up just so I can stop looking at this market and get some sleep!Nigelb said:
That’s my gut feel.DecrepiterJohnL said:
Rice is bouncing around between odds-on and odds-against the same way Kamala Harris was a few days ago. My guess is people are actively adjusting their positions according to what they think will happen. If it were a leak, if someone thought they knew, they'd just take the lot, and that is not happening.Nigelb said:
Leak, or jumping too soon to conclusions ?DecrepiterJohnL said:USA Dem VP slot -- Susan Rice now odds-on on Betfair. Many of the rags laid off the boards.
Susan Rice: 1.7
Kamala Harris: 2.92
Val Demings: 19
Gretchen Whitmer: 20
Elizabeth Warren: 26
Michelle Obama: 30
Tammy Duckworth: 30
Hillary Clinton: 65
(FWIW, I’ve covered both options.)
But like everyone else, I don’t know anything.1 -
I feel like this was decided months ago2
-
You are being disingenuous there, Charles. Clearly, using a Bible as kindling because it is to hand is qualitatively different from burning a Bible specifically in order to make a political or religious point. And one or two people burning a Bible for either reason and others not noticing is qualitatively different from deliberate, political Bible-burning being one of the defining themes of the protest.Charles said:
From the article...rottenborough said:
The truth was far more mundane. A few protesters among the many thousands appear to have burned a single Bible — and possibly a second — for kindling to start a bigger fire. None of the other protesters seemed to notice or care.
So conservatives criticised protestors for burning the Bible because... drum roll... they burned a Bible.
But it's a "Russian Hit!!!!!!" because, presumably, this is seen as a way of drawing the sting from a legitimate criticism.
edit: and in what way is "using a Bible as kindling for a bigger fire" any different to "burning a Bible"?0 -
I don’t see how you can ethically* implement a target species challenge trial though given the severity of the disease. I think you’ve got to go down the route of a placebo controlled trialNigelb said:An important debate (FWIW I’m in favour of a challenge trial):
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1293263923022503936
* meant in the technical sense rather than a personal comment.0 -
Fair enough. But we don't have a blasphemy law. Only islamaphobes say that.contrarian said:
Personally I can;t stand people who spend their lives picking holes in the Koran or what the prophet did or didn;t do with his time or whatever. What a bunch of useless saddos. Nobody listens to them or gives a toss.kinabalu said:
What about people who spend every waking hour "criticizing and satirizing" Islam?contrarian said:
Absolutely not but I do defend people who might like to criticise and satirize islam and its prophet should they so wish, along with christianity, buddhism, humanism, and the attitudes of the left, right, and every other belief out there.TheScreamingEagles said:
Do you still defend coked up racists using the word P*kis?contrarian said:
Anything rather defend a gagging blasphemy law eh?Theuniondivvie said:
Ah, I see the Muslim thing is one of your many triggers.contrarian said:
No 'othering' after Yousef's law BY law....! - or prison!CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Still, you get to keep your hands. For now.
Should they be prosecuted for that? Put in prison? no. They can try to find fault with religions in stupid inconsequential ways if they want. Its their own time they are wasting. Nobody else's.
ISLAM SUCKS!
See?0 -
And a win of 38 pence on the VP market !
Apologies for anyone who followed my steer.0 -
Before or after the premium charge?Pulpstar said:And a win of 38 pence on the VP market !
Apologies for anyone who followed my steer.0 -
As I earlier tipped her at 1000/1 for next President, I am quietly delighted.Scott_xP said:2 -
That'll reduce it further.TheScreamingEagles said:
Before or after the premium charge?Pulpstar said:And a win of 38 pence on the VP market !
Apologies for anyone who followed my steer.0 -
Sadly, I have lost a few quid on this one. I urm and argh too long about greening out Harris.Pulpstar said:And a win of 38 pence on the VP market !
Apologies for anyone who followed my steer.0 -
Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.0
-
So it's Kamala as per my vision! But when will she be president? This is the question we must now focus on.rottenborough said:
Harris 1.03 now.DecrepiterJohnL said:
They think it's all over...DecrepiterJohnL said:
Bass out:DecrepiterJohnL said:
All the books have suspended. Is something up or do they just fancy an early night?Nigelb said:
The rational thing to do is ... LOL.DecrepiterJohnL said:
I suppose the rational thing to do might be to look at the other candidates if we assume it is a false market on the front two, but can we assume that? Tbh I am thinking of greening up just so I can stop looking at this market and get some sleep!Nigelb said:
That’s my gut feel.DecrepiterJohnL said:
Rice is bouncing around between odds-on and odds-against the same way Kamala Harris was a few days ago. My guess is people are actively adjusting their positions according to what they think will happen. If it were a leak, if someone thought they knew, they'd just take the lot, and that is not happening.Nigelb said:
Leak, or jumping too soon to conclusions ?DecrepiterJohnL said:USA Dem VP slot -- Susan Rice now odds-on on Betfair. Many of the rags laid off the boards.
Susan Rice: 1.7
Kamala Harris: 2.92
Val Demings: 19
Gretchen Whitmer: 20
Elizabeth Warren: 26
Michelle Obama: 30
Tammy Duckworth: 30
Hillary Clinton: 65
(FWIW, I’ve covered both options.)
But like everyone else, I don’t know anything.
California Rep. Karen Bass, chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, was told by Biden himself that she was not the pick, a source familiar tells CNN.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/11/politics/biden-vp-pick/index.html
Rice 7
Harris 1.40 -
I’m not an education specialist but isn’t the best way to give an Alphanumeric result in future to indicate both relative and absolute performancefox327 said:
There is no good way out of this now. The schools stayed open for key workers's children. They could have stayed open for examinations as well, possibly by hiring extra premises and retired teachers. No attempt was made to do this by the government, and all the consequences for the examination system flow from this fact. Also, students' coursework could have been externally marked instead of being marked by their own teachers. This government put responding to the COVID crisis above everything else, including educational standards, and they are about to reap the consequences.ydoethur said:
Option B.Carnyx said:
Youy're forgetting that the results still rank people, and there are dates on the certificates.MikeL said:Next year they'll say it's not fair to have lower grades than this year - especially as those children will also have had their work interrupted by virus.
So you're then in a position of prizes for everyone and a completely meaningless exam system.
That then means employers just set their own tests to determine who really is capable.
Either the system will revert to the pre-virus procedures and no comparable special treatment, which is rough justice of sorts but a special case (as, it must be said, so much else to do with the virus). Or the system needs to be reviewed in its approach to grading. It will be very interesting to see what the promised review in Scotland does.
The point is that this has shown with brutal clarity that the people running our exam systems are morons.
Now those of us who have worked for them - as I have - and seen their incompetence up close knew that already.
But as of this moment, everyone knows are exams are controlled by people who cannot manage simple quality control processes or basic statistics.
How does that affect the credibility of exams going forward? Hint - not positively.
So I do not see how either OFQUAL or the SQA or indeed the direct exam boards survive this fiasco. They already looked shaky enough even before today’s announcement (and given the way England’s results are set up, I am 99% sure Williamson will have to follow suit here).
That might well be a good thing. But it does depend on what replaces them.
A new set of qualifications will be probably needed in a few years time as the current school examinations are now likely to become irrevocably degraded by grade inflation.
How was grade inflation avoided for so many years in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s and the early 1980s? I suspect that exam boards were relatively free of political interference and regulations. Perhaps schools would now be better off with the International Baccalaureate which is run in such a way as to prioritise academic standards. This however will not be allowed as government intervention in schools will only increase. It is funny that the more government interference in education there is, the lower the academic standards become.
A89 would indicate top 10% of candidates with a course mark of 89%
D64 would indicate that they are in 30-40% band and scored 64%
Etc etc
(I’d mark everyone who is lower than a relative rank of 50% as an F)0 -
Harris seems competent1
-
Understood.Charles said:
I don’t see how you can ethically* implement a target species challenge trial though given the severity of the disease. I think you’ve got to go down the route of a placebo controlled trialNigelb said:An important debate (FWIW I’m in favour of a challenge trial):
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1293263923022503936
* meant in the technical sense rather than a personal comment.
It’s not an easy decision, but IMO, if you have a cohort of young, properly informed volunteers, and the challenge dose is strictly limited, there is a very good case for it.0 -
Reddit, which on the whole is pretty left-wing and pro Bernie, seems relatively happy with Harris. The “4th most progressive senator” apparently: https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate.TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
2 -
Pleased I didn't lay off my Kamala position on the basis of that fox news scheduling bit.
Decent choice from Biden, who seems to be playing it safe in all respects.1 -
Fwiw I have Roseanne Cash, George Takei, Craig Mazin and The Lincoln Project on my twitter feed applauding the Harris pick.TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
0 -
Well they'll be able to regret their decision as they are being rounded up by 'federal' paramilitary and taken to a holding area then wont they. Fools.TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
0 -
OTOH Just laid off £25 at 85 on Harris in the main prediential market.1
-
Indeed you are.TheScreamingEagles said:
Well I'm the King of subtlety and nuance.Mexicanpete said:
I think I saw what you did there.TheScreamingEagles said:God, I hate it when the aristos tell the plebs what to do.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/1293263729665159169
Being poorly educated I am still however debating the following conundrum:
Plain old Neil Kinnock being lectured by Lord Stansgate.
OR
Plain old Tony Benn being lectured by Lord Kinnock.0 -
What’s your definition?TheScreamingEagles said:
By the definition in my OED Benn was an aristo.Charles said:
It’s a post Lloyd George peerage. No way he qualifies.TheScreamingEagles said:
I too have paid both rent and a mortgage and I'm no pleb.Charles said:
I’ve paid both rent and a mortgage. Does that make me a pleb in your eyes?TheScreamingEagles said:God, I hate it when the aristos tell the plebs what to do.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/1293263729665159169
But the second Viscount Stansgate is definitely an aristo.
Benn had a hereditary peerage, sure, but the massive expansion of that class by Lloyd George and his successors substantially devalued their worth.
There are currently 814 hereditary peers in the U.K., of which about 700 are “post Lloyd George”0 -
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.0 -
President Biden and Prime Minister Starmer.
Very similar personalities0 -
Harris 1.01 to be VP nominee
BUT BUT BUT Biden 1.02 to be Presidential nominee.
So 1.02 Biden to keep breathing for one more week and if he does pull out then presumably Harris bets go down as well.0 -
I'm a relentless pessimist on this election.Nigelb said:
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.
I'm definitely a glass half empty guy at the moment.0 -
Not Michelle Obama then?
Robert Smithson must be mightily relieved.3 -
At least in the UK its a fringe, not a government.Theuniondivvie said:
Aye, the 'UKIP, Farage and Brexit were vastly important elements in the nation's history' merchants always seem to fall silent when they're reminded that Scotland didn't vote for any of them. I am quite proud of that as it happens.CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=200 -
-
There's lots of things where it seems to be assumed the Scots are very different to the rest of the UK.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
0 -
Matter of opinion of course but I feel you last two words are superfluous.Nigelb said:
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.2 -
Can you really properly inform people about tail risk though? I’m not sure you can. And if the dose is limited it may not reflect the real world / if the challenge cohort is limited (not sure which you meant) you run into issues with statistical significanceNigelb said:
Understood.Charles said:
I don’t see how you can ethically* implement a target species challenge trial though given the severity of the disease. I think you’ve got to go down the route of a placebo controlled trialNigelb said:An important debate (FWIW I’m in favour of a challenge trial):
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1293263923022503936
* meant in the technical sense rather than a personal comment.
It’s not an easy decision, but IMO, if you have a cohort of young, properly informed volunteers, and the challenge dose is strictly limited, there is a very good case for it.0 -
☺ - Ok. I'll get writing!Theuniondivvie said:
Can indeed, classic Play for Today if there was still a PFT.kinabalu said:
Ha. Well my dad was management and running picket lines, my brother at 19 was on strike and on those lines, and they lived together. You can imagine.Theuniondivvie said:
Don't think McGahey was that keen on Arthur either though he stayed on board during the battle.kinabalu said:
Which would have endeared him all the more to my dad. He hated - and I mean hated - Scargill. Still does. The miners strike was intense in our house. Got a bit traumatic at times.another_richard said:
As I remember Jimmy Reid was rather scathing about Arthur.kinabalu said:
My dad - even during his working class uncle tom tory phase - was a massive fan of Jimmy Reid.Theuniondivvie said:
Jimmy Reid, trade unionist and variously Communist, Labour member & supporter of Scottish Independence, was a big cricket fan.kinabalu said:
Is it possible, would you say, to support Scottish independence AND like cricket?malcolmg said:
Massie is a unionist lickspittle, he could not be objective if it hit him on the face. Everything SNP or independence is bad to him, the fanny likes cricket, what can I say.Carnyx said:
Massie is finding it unreasonable that a party focussed heavily on the student demographic should focus also on its concerns. Rather odd of him.CarlottaVance said:The Scot Greens caved! Who saw that coming?
https://twitter.com/alexmassie/status/1293223482273259529?s=20
The SNP administration is a minority one, pace those PBers who go berserk about alleged one-party states. So of course the Greens claim the credit. It's not as if the SCUP MSPs would vote to help the SNP at all, still less the SLAB ones (on the Bain Principle), and I'm not sure what the LDs think except SNP bad.
I have not in practice come across this particular combination but my circle is not wide these days.
Edit: I note it was the 10th anniversary of his death yesterday. His funeral service was attended by Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Gordon Brown, Alex Salmond, Sir Alex Ferguson and Sir Billy Connolly, not a bad haul changing reputations notwithstanding.
"If all communists were like that I'd consider it."
Still remember him saying that.
Feisty times, used to go to my gran's for tea and get pummeled by my dad as a pinko enemy within, then go to a hostelry to get pummeled by the ultras for saying Arthur was fucking it up. Happy days..
Maybe an R4 afternoon play in these reduced times?0 -
-
0
-
Don't blame you. I think all this talk of Biden being ahead by plenty is going to turn out to be polling rot. Shy Trumpsters will come out of the woodwork and make this very close imho.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm a relentless pessimist on this election.Nigelb said:
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.
I'm definitely a glass half empty guy at the moment.
Hope I am very wrong.0 -
Some inspirationkinabalu said:
☺ - Ok. I'll get writing!Theuniondivvie said:
Can indeed, classic Play for Today if there was still a PFT.kinabalu said:
Ha. Well my dad was management and running picket lines, my brother at 19 was on strike and on those lines, and they lived together. You can imagine.Theuniondivvie said:
Don't think McGahey was that keen on Arthur either though he stayed on board during the battle.kinabalu said:
Which would have endeared him all the more to my dad. He hated - and I mean hated - Scargill. Still does. The miners strike was intense in our house. Got a bit traumatic at times.another_richard said:
As I remember Jimmy Reid was rather scathing about Arthur.kinabalu said:
My dad - even during his working class uncle tom tory phase - was a massive fan of Jimmy Reid.Theuniondivvie said:
Jimmy Reid, trade unionist and variously Communist, Labour member & supporter of Scottish Independence, was a big cricket fan.kinabalu said:
Is it possible, would you say, to support Scottish independence AND like cricket?malcolmg said:
Massie is a unionist lickspittle, he could not be objective if it hit him on the face. Everything SNP or independence is bad to him, the fanny likes cricket, what can I say.Carnyx said:
Massie is finding it unreasonable that a party focussed heavily on the student demographic should focus also on its concerns. Rather odd of him.CarlottaVance said:The Scot Greens caved! Who saw that coming?
https://twitter.com/alexmassie/status/1293223482273259529?s=20
The SNP administration is a minority one, pace those PBers who go berserk about alleged one-party states. So of course the Greens claim the credit. It's not as if the SCUP MSPs would vote to help the SNP at all, still less the SLAB ones (on the Bain Principle), and I'm not sure what the LDs think except SNP bad.
I have not in practice come across this particular combination but my circle is not wide these days.
Edit: I note it was the 10th anniversary of his death yesterday. His funeral service was attended by Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Gordon Brown, Alex Salmond, Sir Alex Ferguson and Sir Billy Connolly, not a bad haul changing reputations notwithstanding.
"If all communists were like that I'd consider it."
Still remember him saying that.
Feisty times, used to go to my gran's for tea and get pummeled by my dad as a pinko enemy within, then go to a hostelry to get pummeled by the ultras for saying Arthur was fucking it up. Happy days..
Maybe an R4 afternoon play in these reduced times?
https://musicaficionado.blog/2016/06/22/shipbuilding-by-elvis-costello/1 -
Is it really needed given the resurgence of COVID? Seems like should be possible to get enough infected anyway given resurgence in US and rapidly rising cases in much of developed world.Nigelb said:
Understood.Charles said:
I don’t see how you can ethically* implement a target species challenge trial though given the severity of the disease. I think you’ve got to go down the route of a placebo controlled trialNigelb said:An important debate (FWIW I’m in favour of a challenge trial):
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1293263923022503936
* meant in the technical sense rather than a personal comment.
It’s not an easy decision, but IMO, if you have a cohort of young, properly informed volunteers, and the challenge dose is strictly limited, there is a very good case for it.
I'd argue that deliberately infecting with a disease we have little treatment for when there are exposed populations anyway is unethical, unless you can show that this really would speed things up dramatically.0 -
That's nice. Scotland has 4% ethnic minorities. Easy to wave a #refugeeswelcome sign and sneer at the dreadful bigoted English and their tendency to elect anti-immigration parties when you have none of the tensions and difficulties arising from that immigration.Theuniondivvie said:
Aye, the 'UKIP, Farage and Brexit were vastly important elements in the nation's history' merchants always seem to fall silent when they're reminded that Scotland didn't vote for any of them. I am quite proud of that as it happens.CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=201 -
So the Bible was burned in a non-prejorative context and people are only offended because of the Russians?TimT said:
You are being disingenuous there, Charles. Clearly, using a Bible as kindling because it is to hand is qualitatively different from burning a Bible specifically in order to make a political or religious point. And one or two people burning a Bible for either reason and others not noticing is qualitatively different from deliberate, political Bible-burning being one of the defining themes of the protest.Charles said:
From the article...rottenborough said:
The truth was far more mundane. A few protesters among the many thousands appear to have burned a single Bible — and possibly a second — for kindling to start a bigger fire. None of the other protesters seemed to notice or care.
So conservatives criticised protestors for burning the Bible because... drum roll... they burned a Bible.
But it's a "Russian Hit!!!!!!" because, presumably, this is seen as a way of drawing the sting from a legitimate criticism.
edit: and in what way is "using a Bible as kindling for a bigger fire" any different to "burning a Bible"?
Somehow I don't think many US Christians are going to find that argument very convincing.1 -
Indeed I 100% agree with you on this.kinabalu said:
Fair enough. But we don't have a blasphemy law. Only islamaphobes say that.contrarian said:
Personally I can;t stand people who spend their lives picking holes in the Koran or what the prophet did or didn;t do with his time or whatever. What a bunch of useless saddos. Nobody listens to them or gives a toss.kinabalu said:
What about people who spend every waking hour "criticizing and satirizing" Islam?contrarian said:
Absolutely not but I do defend people who might like to criticise and satirize islam and its prophet should they so wish, along with christianity, buddhism, humanism, and the attitudes of the left, right, and every other belief out there.TheScreamingEagles said:
Do you still defend coked up racists using the word P*kis?contrarian said:
Anything rather defend a gagging blasphemy law eh?Theuniondivvie said:
Ah, I see the Muslim thing is one of your many triggers.contrarian said:
No 'othering' after Yousef's law BY law....! - or prison!CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Still, you get to keep your hands. For now.
Should they be prosecuted for that? Put in prison? no. They can try to find fault with religions in stupid inconsequential ways if they want. Its their own time they are wasting. Nobody else's.
ISLAM SUCKS!
See?0 -
I hope not, it totally destroys my mental image of you.Charles said:
I’ve paid both rent and a mortgage. Does that make me a pleb in your eyes?TheScreamingEagles said:God, I hate it when the aristos tell the plebs what to do.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/12932637296651591690 -
It's american politics, it's in the constitution that it needs to be interminably drawn out.CorrectHorseBattery said:I feel like this was decided months ago
1 -
The SNP like to push the line that "the Scots are different from rUK".kle4 said:
There's lots of things where it seems to be assumed the Scots are very different to the rest of the UK.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
The polling evidence on attitudes says otherwise.
2 -
I'm more worried about electoral shenanigans from Trump and the GOP.rottenborough said:
Don't blame you. I think all this talk of Biden being ahead by plenty is going to turn out to be polling rot. Shy Trumpsters will come out of the woodwork and make this very close imho.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm a relentless pessimist on this election.Nigelb said:
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.
I'm definitely a glass half empty guy at the moment.
Hope I am very wrong.0 -
Why not Krazy Kamala, to get all alliterative?CorrectHorseBattery said:0 -
How come you can still make 1% profit on backing Harris, after Biden's announcement?
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.1689546470 -
Well I guess Biden gets three for the price of oneNigelb said:
Seriously, could you two please get busy and cancel the troll?0 -
The Right HonourableCarlottaVance said:
At least in the UK its a fringe, not a government.Theuniondivvie said:
Aye, the 'UKIP, Farage and Brexit were vastly important elements in the nation's history' merchants always seem to fall silent when they're reminded that Scotland didn't vote for any of them. I am quite proud of that as it happens.CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Boris Johnson
MP
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom0 -
Yet their electoral success suggests it is working, possibly even to the ultimate end at some point.CarlottaVance said:
The SNP like to push the line that "the Scots are different from rUK".kle4 said:
There's lots of things where it seems to be assumed the Scots are very different to the rest of the UK.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
The polling evidence on attitudes says otherwise.0 -
Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898564 -
Poor Wolves.0
-
Actuarial doesn't explain it.Andy_JS said:How come you can still make 1% profit on backing Harris, after Biden's announcement?
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.1689546471 -
Having made money on both nominee & VP, I am perhaps overconfident, I acknowledge...TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm a relentless pessimist on this election.Nigelb said:
As opposed to Rice ?TheScreamingEagles said:Harris I fear gives the Bernie bros an excuse to sit out the election and let Trump win a second term.
And I don’t buy that thesis anyway.
Biden will be running on the most progressive Democratic platform ever. Against the biggest asshole to hold the Presidency since Jackson.
I'm definitely a glass half empty guy at the moment.
1 -
Battle for the soul of the nation is a bit of a mouthful, but does add an element of moral imperative for those who dislike Trump to get on board, whatever the misgivings.rottenborough said:0 -
Nigel Farage says hello...CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898560 -
Here's a thought, why doesn't England vote for the government it wants to deal the tensions and difficulties arising from immigration, and Scotland can do the same?Luckyguy1983 said:
That's nice. Scotland has 4% ethnic minorities. Easy to wave a #refugeeswelcome sign and sneer at the dreadful bigoted English and their tendency to elect anti-immigration parties when you have none of the tensions and difficulties arising from that immigration.Theuniondivvie said:
Aye, the 'UKIP, Farage and Brexit were vastly important elements in the nation's history' merchants always seem to fall silent when they're reminded that Scotland didn't vote for any of them. I am quite proud of that as it happens.CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Oh, that's right, England already does.0 -
That's their right. You don't stop free speech when it gets 'a bit much'.kinabalu said:
What about people who spend every waking hour "criticizing and satirizing" Islam?contrarian said:
Absolutely not but I do defend people who might like to criticise and satirize islam and its prophet should they so wish, along with christianity, buddhism, humanism, and the attitudes of the left, right, and every other belief out there.TheScreamingEagles said:
Do you still defend coked up racists using the word P*kis?contrarian said:
Anything rather defend a gagging blasphemy law eh?Theuniondivvie said:
Ah, I see the Muslim thing is one of your many triggers.contrarian said:
No 'othering' after Yousef's law BY law....! - or prison!CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Still, you get to keep your hands. For now.1 -
Especially as VAR missed the encroachment on the penalty.tlg86 said:Poor Wolves.
0 -
That you could certainly do.rkrkrk said:
Is it really needed given the resurgence of COVID? Seems like should be possible to get enough infected anyway given resurgence in US and rapidly rising cases in much of developed world.Nigelb said:
Understood.Charles said:
I don’t see how you can ethically* implement a target species challenge trial though given the severity of the disease. I think you’ve got to go down the route of a placebo controlled trialNigelb said:An important debate (FWIW I’m in favour of a challenge trial):
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1293263923022503936
* meant in the technical sense rather than a personal comment.
It’s not an easy decision, but IMO, if you have a cohort of young, properly informed volunteers, and the challenge dose is strictly limited, there is a very good case for it.
I'd argue that deliberately infecting with a disease we have little treatment for when there are exposed populations anyway is unethical, unless you can show that this really would speed things up dramatically.
I agree that the rest is a difficult call.0 -
I'm sure if we just argue for long enough eventually the Tories will agree with public ownership and ending austerity for goodtlg86 said:
Nigel Farage says hello...CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898560 -
You can get 1.01 on Harris because you can get 1.02 on Joe Biden being the presidential nominee.EPG said:
Actuarial doesn't explain it.Andy_JS said:How come you can still make 1% profit on backing Harris, after Biden's announcement?
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.1689546471 -
What these cretins pretend not to realise is that making slight compromises in the interests of winning does not mean you have to abandon all of your principles and objectives. It's not an either/or equation.CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898561 -
0
-
And are you scared of prosecution? No.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed I 100% agree with you on this.kinabalu said:
Fair enough. But we don't have a blasphemy law. Only islamaphobes say that.contrarian said:
Personally I can;t stand people who spend their lives picking holes in the Koran or what the prophet did or didn;t do with his time or whatever. What a bunch of useless saddos. Nobody listens to them or gives a toss.kinabalu said:
What about people who spend every waking hour "criticizing and satirizing" Islam?contrarian said:
Absolutely not but I do defend people who might like to criticise and satirize islam and its prophet should they so wish, along with christianity, buddhism, humanism, and the attitudes of the left, right, and every other belief out there.TheScreamingEagles said:
Do you still defend coked up racists using the word P*kis?contrarian said:
Anything rather defend a gagging blasphemy law eh?Theuniondivvie said:
Ah, I see the Muslim thing is one of your many triggers.contrarian said:
No 'othering' after Yousef's law BY law....! - or prison!CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Still, you get to keep your hands. For now.
Should they be prosecuted for that? Put in prison? no. They can try to find fault with religions in stupid inconsequential ways if they want. Its their own time they are wasting. Nobody else's.
ISLAM SUCKS!
See?
It's bollox this "blasphemy law" claim.0 -
I actually think that encroachment and goalkeeper off the line shouldn't be covered by VAR. The on-field officials should get it right.TheScreamingEagles said:
Especially as VAR missed the encroachment on the penalty.tlg86 said:Poor Wolves.
0 -
Northumberland is 98% White so experiences none of the “difficulties” or “tensions” @Luckyguy1983 is blathering on about. They still elect Tory MPs though.Theuniondivvie said:
Here's a thought, why doesn't England vote for the government it wants to deal the tensions and difficulties arising from immigration, and Scotland can do the same?Luckyguy1983 said:
That's nice. Scotland has 4% ethnic minorities. Easy to wave a #refugeeswelcome sign and sneer at the dreadful bigoted English and their tendency to elect anti-immigration parties when you have none of the tensions and difficulties arising from that immigration.Theuniondivvie said:
Aye, the 'UKIP, Farage and Brexit were vastly important elements in the nation's history' merchants always seem to fall silent when they're reminded that Scotland didn't vote for any of them. I am quite proud of that as it happens.CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Oh, that's right, England already does.
County Durham also.0 -
Hasn't that, err, happened?!CorrectHorseBattery said:
I'm sure if we just argue for long enough eventually the Tories will agree with public ownership and ending austerity for goodtlg86 said:
Nigel Farage says hello...CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898560 -
Well Biden is 1.02 still. And if he snuffs it I presume Harris becomes the Dem nominee.EPG said:
Actuarial doesn't explain it.Andy_JS said:How come you can still make 1% profit on backing Harris, after Biden's announcement?
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.1689546470 -
No they don't.kle4 said:
What these cretins pretend not to realise is that making slight compromises in the interests of winning does not mean you have to abandon all of your principles and objectives. It's not an either/or equation.CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/1293287518692089856
Their obsession is with proving Starmer isn't left wing enough. But let's be honest it's because he's not polling -75 that makes them angry.
Maybe we just have to accept we can't pitch everything we want but I'd rather have half of it and actually get elected0 -
It didn't happen because we argued, it happened because we fought elections and changed the landscape. 2017 was the primary cause of that, not Jezza holding rallies for 10 yearstlg86 said:
Hasn't that, err, happened?!CorrectHorseBattery said:
I'm sure if we just argue for long enough eventually the Tories will agree with public ownership and ending austerity for goodtlg86 said:
Nigel Farage says hello...CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898560 -
If you say so, though on free speech issues better to err on the side of caution.kinabalu said:
And are you scared of prosecution? No.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed I 100% agree with you on this.kinabalu said:
Fair enough. But we don't have a blasphemy law. Only islamaphobes say that.contrarian said:
Personally I can;t stand people who spend their lives picking holes in the Koran or what the prophet did or didn;t do with his time or whatever. What a bunch of useless saddos. Nobody listens to them or gives a toss.kinabalu said:
What about people who spend every waking hour "criticizing and satirizing" Islam?contrarian said:
Absolutely not but I do defend people who might like to criticise and satirize islam and its prophet should they so wish, along with christianity, buddhism, humanism, and the attitudes of the left, right, and every other belief out there.TheScreamingEagles said:
Do you still defend coked up racists using the word P*kis?contrarian said:
Anything rather defend a gagging blasphemy law eh?Theuniondivvie said:
Ah, I see the Muslim thing is one of your many triggers.contrarian said:
No 'othering' after Yousef's law BY law....! - or prison!CarlottaVance said:
Absolutely! No "othering" in Scottish politics! No "blaming another country" for Scotland's failings. You must be so proud!Theuniondivvie said:
Yeah, we just seem to be reasonably immune from a need to vote for parties that espouse ant-immigrant & anti-refugee rhetoric, eg UKIP, TBP and the Tory party. Still, let's see if the linesman can build up some momentum with the gypsy traveller schtick.CarlottaVance said:Not so different.....
https://twitter.com/martinmccluskey/status/1293218977502703616?s=20
Still, you get to keep your hands. For now.
Should they be prosecuted for that? Put in prison? no. They can try to find fault with religions in stupid inconsequential ways if they want. Its their own time they are wasting. Nobody else's.
ISLAM SUCKS!
See?
It's bollox this "blasphemy law" claim.0 -
Blackpool alone has three.Charles said:
What’s your definition?TheScreamingEagles said:
By the definition in my OED Benn was an aristo.Charles said:
It’s a post Lloyd George peerage. No way he qualifies.TheScreamingEagles said:
I too have paid both rent and a mortgage and I'm no pleb.Charles said:
I’ve paid both rent and a mortgage. Does that make me a pleb in your eyes?TheScreamingEagles said:God, I hate it when the aristos tell the plebs what to do.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/1293263729665159169
But the second Viscount Stansgate is definitely an aristo.
Benn had a hereditary peerage, sure, but the massive expansion of that class by Lloyd George and his successors substantially devalued their worth.
There are currently 814 hereditary peers in the U.K., of which about 700 are “post Lloyd George”0 -
Also I've just noticed Harris is 100 to be the presidential candidate herself, (as well as 75 to become president).DecrepiterJohnL said:
You can get 1.01 on Harris because you can get 1.02 on Joe Biden being the presidential nominee.EPG said:
Actuarial doesn't explain it.Andy_JS said:How come you can still make 1% profit on backing Harris, after Biden's announcement?
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.1689546470 -
Great stuff. But long time no hear.isam said:
Some inspirationkinabalu said:
☺ - Ok. I'll get writing!Theuniondivvie said:
Can indeed, classic Play for Today if there was still a PFT.kinabalu said:
Ha. Well my dad was management and running picket lines, my brother at 19 was on strike and on those lines, and they lived together. You can imagine.Theuniondivvie said:
Don't think McGahey was that keen on Arthur either though he stayed on board during the battle.kinabalu said:
Which would have endeared him all the more to my dad. He hated - and I mean hated - Scargill. Still does. The miners strike was intense in our house. Got a bit traumatic at times.another_richard said:
As I remember Jimmy Reid was rather scathing about Arthur.kinabalu said:
My dad - even during his working class uncle tom tory phase - was a massive fan of Jimmy Reid.Theuniondivvie said:
Jimmy Reid, trade unionist and variously Communist, Labour member & supporter of Scottish Independence, was a big cricket fan.kinabalu said:
Is it possible, would you say, to support Scottish independence AND like cricket?malcolmg said:
Massie is a unionist lickspittle, he could not be objective if it hit him on the face. Everything SNP or independence is bad to him, the fanny likes cricket, what can I say.Carnyx said:
Massie is finding it unreasonable that a party focussed heavily on the student demographic should focus also on its concerns. Rather odd of him.CarlottaVance said:The Scot Greens caved! Who saw that coming?
https://twitter.com/alexmassie/status/1293223482273259529?s=20
The SNP administration is a minority one, pace those PBers who go berserk about alleged one-party states. So of course the Greens claim the credit. It's not as if the SCUP MSPs would vote to help the SNP at all, still less the SLAB ones (on the Bain Principle), and I'm not sure what the LDs think except SNP bad.
I have not in practice come across this particular combination but my circle is not wide these days.
Edit: I note it was the 10th anniversary of his death yesterday. His funeral service was attended by Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Gordon Brown, Alex Salmond, Sir Alex Ferguson and Sir Billy Connolly, not a bad haul changing reputations notwithstanding.
"If all communists were like that I'd consider it."
Still remember him saying that.
Feisty times, used to go to my gran's for tea and get pummeled by my dad as a pinko enemy within, then go to a hostelry to get pummeled by the ultras for saying Arthur was fucking it up. Happy days..
Maybe an R4 afternoon play in these reduced times?
https://musicaficionado.blog/2016/06/22/shipbuilding-by-elvis-costello/0 -
This is why winning was Corbyn's worst nightmare. One can't harp from the sidelines when controlling the levers of power. Harping from the touchline is what the Corbyn set live for.CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898562 -
Brexit happened ages ago. Why are these guys still so obsessed?CarlottaVance said:0 -
The Tories have to abandon principles to win elections too.kle4 said:
What these cretins pretend not to realise is that making slight compromises in the interests of winning does not mean you have to abandon all of your principles and objectives. It's not an either/or equation.CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898560 -
Oh really?kinabalu said:
Except make it possible - in defiance of a rising tide of introverted populism - for 1m plus people fleeing destitution and violence to have the sort of life that you and I take for granted.Philip_Thompson said:
She was the lesser, narrow minded politician.kinabalu said:
She exposed the hypocrisy and empty rhetoric of lesser, narrow minded politicians. This is not my definition of despicable.MattW said:
I think PT is absolutely correct on this one. Merkel's behaviour was despicable.kle4 said:
I think it rather telling, whether one supports Merkel's intentions or their consequences or not, that apparently cooperation between nations which is usually stated to be so vital went right out the window and it was deemed ok to act unilaterally in the way she did.Philip_Thompson said:
Merkel was neither brace nor principled. Brave and principled would have been saying Germany would be taking more migrants and offering safe transport to get there. She took the path of least resistance instead and created a darkly Darwinian experiment of survival of the fittest that led to many deaths with no safe transit.kinabalu said:
Many votes in being "tough" on this issue. Merkel was imo brave and principled to go the other way.rcs1000 said:
IIRC, between 75 and 80% of claims happen at the UK's international airports. So, if we assume that 30,000 asylum seekers arrive in the UK each year, that means around 6,000 come via the Channel.Flatlander said:
Are there any statistics as to where the claim of asylum was made?rcs1000 said:UK: number of asylum seekers by year
(It doesn't get much reported, but more of France's asylum seekers head North to Belgium, Holland and beyond than try and cross the Channel. While Sangrettes and the Calais jungle gets all the press, the reality is that the French government puts migrant camps by their international borders, makes conditions really shit, and then hope that as many as possible self-deport. They do this because it is politically popular in France.)
Cameron was brave and principled.
One point not noted was that Germany at the time had a shrinking population and a lot empty homes (unlike the UK) so had many facilities available.
This was 2014:
Did she offer to take refugees from camps at the front line?
Did she offer safe transport and safe transit to a safe harbour?
She did nothing.
So did she offer safe transit for a million plus people?
Did she have some selection criteria, or even lottery or any other metric to fairly determine who those million would be?
Did she do so based on needs?
Or did she walk away from making any decisions and did people smugglers and criminal gangs provide the transport for a million people leaving people to drown due to her inaction?
Given your objections to eg private schools, I don't understand how you don't seethe with rage at how despicable her letting money and gangs determine who could migrate instead of fairness. Clearly your ideals on fairness only go so far.
By saying that anyone who made it there could stay but there'd be no legal movement or safe transit and you'd have to pay people smugglers to get you there - was no more fair than a politician saying everyone should have a good education, so long as parents pay tuition fees to private schools and there will be no state schools.0 -
Harris is as safe a VP nominee as they come for the Dems, plainly not on the loony left but also 'expands the coalition' for the whitehouse.1
-
Because they think it will define voting habits forever.Gallowgate said:
Brexit happened ages ago. Why are these guys still so obsessed?CarlottaVance said:
I genuinely don't know if that's the case, I wonder what the electoral landscape looks like after we've ended the transition period0 -
So, after all that, we end up with the pick who’s been favourite for ages. Anyone else think that Biden just wanted everyone taking about the VP ‘race’, to take the heat off himself for a couple of months?0
-
Perhaps they'll regain them when Brexit turns out not to be the solution to all the problems.CarlottaVance said:0 -
Yes, but not all of them.Andy_JS said:
The Tories have to abandon principles to win elections too.kle4 said:
What these cretins pretend not to realise is that making slight compromises in the interests of winning does not mean you have to abandon all of your principles and objectives. It's not an either/or equation.CorrectHorseBattery said:Stats for Lefties, AKA Propaganda for Lefties
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1293287031804747778
https://twitter.com/CorrectHorseB/status/12932875186920898561