Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The front pages after Dom’s big day

167891012»

Comments

  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    The irony is that while Sturgeon is getting stellar polling the Scottish performance is pretty poor, especially around care homes and their predilection for doing some things differently with no benefit. But being more cautious with respect to lockdown has struck a public nerve even if ultimately it could be harmful for the economy. But politically the SNP are definitely benefiting from Covid.
    The trouble comes for them once they start easing. Locking down is easy, opening back up is hard.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,371

    Agree. If Cummings had gone immediately there might even have been a modicum of sympathy. A dad doing what he thought was right for his family but accepting that the optics are terrible and that he doesn't want to be a distraction to the health messaging. And then, a few months down the line, back in Number 10. Sturgeon tried to hang on to Calderwood - they even had a joint presser - but had to give her up eventually. Doesn't have to be damaging.
    Absolutely, Big Dom does a soft soap interview showing some contrition, the optics look a lot better, especially if the hate mob go OTT.
  • The Chris Huhne reference has given me an idea. Is there anyway that Cummings can give a sworn statement so that he his guilty of perjury if it is proven to be false?

    No, because this isn't (as yet) before the courts. Perjury is basically only an offence in judicial proceedings.

    I also don't really see the point. If there are important factual points in his story that are later proven to be false, he's a goner.

    But that's unlikely - however ludicrous the Barnard Bridge eye test explanation was, for example, it's not clear what "evidence" would disprove it easily (short of a family member breaking ranks, as indeed undid Huhne).
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,034

    Media scrum does indeed look ugly. Also saw some Sky twerp seeking out Cummings' parents. Not an edifying spectacle.


    I agree but it is sadly a feature of our society and it happens to anyone in the news, there is nothing particularly horrific or unique about the way Cummings has been treated.
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 2,969
    Alistair said:

    Can't even say the word sacked. Big Dom has considered his position already and has decided he will stay.
    That's basically the Scottish Party in open revolt. Be interesting to see how the "Minister for the Union" responds.
    Sensible positioning ahead of May 2021.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,517
    Scott_xP said:

    The first cabinet minister to call for Cummings head could be the next PM

    Do any of them have the gumption?

    He who wields the knife...
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,906
    dixiedean said:

    Difficult to see any obvious reason why the NE should be declining so much slower than London.
    If it were acquired immunity, one would expect the north-east to be declining fastest of all.

    I suppose the weather does tend to be a few degrees warmer in London?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,896
  • eekeek Posts: 29,696

    Agree. If Cummings had gone immediately there might even have been a modicum of sympathy. A dad doing what he thought was right for his family but accepting that the optics are terrible and that he doesn't want to be a distraction to the health messaging. And then, a few months down the line, back in Number 10. Sturgeon tried to hang on to Calderwood - they even had a joint presser - but had to give her up eventually. Doesn't have to be damaging.
    It didn't even require that - all that was required was for Cummings to resign and Boris to reject it due to current circumstances - we need to restart the economy and I don't want to lose anyone would have been enough.

    This mess is completely self inflicted.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,220
    edited May 2020
    Scott_xP said:

    Hey, what can we do to damp down the Cummings row?

    Piss off some more Tory MPs...

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1265269774424121344

    Didnt he beat the MP appointed chair of the liaison committee to the head of the defence committee? Pathetic if that is why he is not allowed to go.

    Loyalists will say who cares apart from Westminster elite, but it is idiotic decisions like this that lead to bad governance and the country being ever so slightly worse off after each bad decision. Over time it adds up and then we wonder why Germany can do better than us.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,276
    Scott_xP said:

    The first cabinet minister to call for Cummings head could be the next PM

    Do any of them have the gumption?

    Patel?
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,276
    HYUFD said:
    Unfair on him, do you think?
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    edited May 2020
    The Mail have gone in 2 footed on Douglas Ross, calling him a remainer and 'Mr Nobody'. I feel like not only are people growing tired of the media onslaught but a lot of Tories who were angry with Cummings now feel the matter is settled.


    I doubt Mr Ross' career will be going far now. Would have made more sense to resign 2 days ago.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,696
    dixiedean said:

    Difficult to see any obvious reason why the NE should be declining so much slower than London.
    A particularly superspreader - but in reality it arrived here later and some areas are having a mare due to poor quality housing (it's also due to the behaviour of the inhabitants that housing but that's a separate issue).
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,204
    Monkeys said:

    People placing comparisons with Mandy or Campbell don't really get that he isn't remotely doing the same job that Mandy or Campbell did. They just wanted Labour to win. Cummings has a plan for something, a set of ideas about how he thinks things should be. We don't know the first thing about what Mandelson really believed, and it wasn't important.
    Are you suggesting Johnson is so dreadfully inept he can't run the country without him for a bit ?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,896
    Stocky said:

    Unfair on him, do you think?
    No, once the adviser becomes the story he is gone
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,087
    dixiedean said:

    Difficult to see any obvious reason why the NE should be declining so much slower than London.
    The obvious reason is that somehow London has reached a higher and significant level of immunity. The mystery is that what data there is hasn’t so far thrown up any evidence.
  • Coronavirus numbers look good
  • MonkeysMonkeys Posts: 766
    Pulpstar said:

    Are you suggesting Johnson is so dreadfully inept he can't run the country without him for a bit ?
    No, that's nothing to do with my point. I'm saying that Cummings is performing radically different actions to the actions of Mandelson or Campbell. It's not just that they would never go against the media the way Dominic did yesterday, it's that that was their entire job description - keep the media onside.

    Dominic isn't interested in the media, he thinks they're outdated. It's a different job spec.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,276
    HYUFD said:

    No, once the adviser becomes the story he is gone
    Brutal business, politics.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,371
    UK supercar maker and Formula 1 team McLaren plans to cut more than a quarter of its workforce after the coronavirus crisis hit sales and advertising revenue.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,906
    IanB2 said:

    The obvious reason is that somehow London has reached a higher and significant level of immunity. The mystery is that what data there is hasn’t so far thrown up any evidence.
    The point is that the highest percentages of confirmed cases are now in the north-east, not London.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,575

    NEW THREAD

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,201

    https://twitter.com/YorkshireTea/status/1231974510385123329?s=19
    It is far too late now. I didn't think Cummings should have resigned. I do think Boris handled the whole fiasco dreadfully.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022
    Scott_xP said:

    The first cabinet minister to call for Cummings head could be the next PM

    Do any of them have the gumption?

    Nope, because they'd have to resign to go against the collective line in public.

    Unless cabinet ministers do start resigning, this story will slowly lose traction despite the media desperation to keep it running.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,220
    edited May 2020
    IanB2 said:

    The obvious reason is that somehow London has reached a higher and significant level of immunity. The mystery is that what data there is hasn’t so far thrown up any evidence.
    Or that the tube is really important to the dynamics of London.

    Comparing London with tube usage @ 10% of London is not the same as comparing lockdown Newcastle with pre lockdown Newcastle, the change is of a different order.

    The transformation of lockdown on the worlds most connected city is not the same as the transformation the same lockdown on a provincial region and we shouldnt expect the same results.

    edit: Its not just the tube, also tourism. There will normally be millions of visitors each week moving around town, that doesnt apply in any other UK region during spring.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,276
    I`ve asked this a couple of times before, I know, but why on earth aren`t the government communicating the extraordinary success of getting 900 p/d deaths at peak (NHS England only) down to sub 150, perhaps now even 100?

    Folk don`t know this. Some I`ve asked think the deaths are still going up. We have to "un-scare" people.
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,034

    The longer he stays in place the more lockdown popcorn we consume.

    If it wasn't for the fact that their negligence has the potential to kill us with a deadly virus I would be laughing my nuts off.
    Don't get me wrong, I want Boris and Cummings to stay exactly where they are. We are just beginning to witness Boris's waffling incompetence, there is a lot more to come.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,118

    If Cummings does go after all this, I don't see how Boris can stay long term. Mr Yorkshire Tea could have the fastest promotion from nobody to PM in history.

    John Major was pretty fast. Although whether he remained a nobody whilst PM is open to question.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    HYUFD said:

    No, once the adviser becomes the story he is gone
    Which means Boris must go. You have played the Cummings saga with integrity, but you can also see that that is the natural consequence of him going (and yes, when cabinet ministers - plural - are on the air defending him, it's got to be all over).

    Whatever plan Dom has (as noted by @Monkeys, he certainly has some kind of plan), it's clear that Boris has none. Hence what would drive government? A sub-par PM who loses his strategic direction. Bad and bad.

    Where does that leave government, and the country?
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 2,969
    Brom said:

    The Mail have gone in 2 footed on Douglas Ross, calling him a remainer and 'Mr Nobody'. I feel like not only are people growing tired of the media onslaught but a lot of Tories who were angry with Cummings now feel the matter is settled.


    I doubt Mr Ross' career will be going far now. Would have made more sense to resign 2 days ago.

    No, he has the potential to go a long way. Would be SCon leader if he'd stayed at Holyrood. An effective debater and a world away from the traditional Scots Tory MP profile - big hoose, advocate, public school etc.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,517
    NEW THREAD
  • Scott_xP said:
    Legally, that was a really interesting feature of the case - albeit not the sort of thing to cut through to the general public.

    What made the case unwinnable is that the Government case relied ONLY on prorogation being non-justiciable (which was absolutely crackers legally and never stood a chance).

    They did not even make an argument that, even if it was justiciable, the Government acted within its very wide discretion by doing it. Because nobody at all in Government (from the PM down) was willing to sign a statement simply confirming the publicly stated justification was the truth. That limb was one which MIGHT have succeeded but not one person would perjure themselves (which is almost admirable in a twisted way).
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,291

    UK supercar maker and Formula 1 team McLaren plans to cut more than a quarter of its workforce after the coronavirus crisis hit sales and advertising revenue.

    Making a car with a 220 grand list price and doors held together with double sided tape will only endure for so long.
  • rjkrjk Posts: 72
    IanB2 said:

    The obvious reason is that somehow London has reached a higher and significant level of immunity. The mystery is that what data there is hasn’t so far thrown up any evidence.
    That isn't obvious to me. I think a more general version is obviously true: the faster decline in London is because there is a greater difference in conditions between London today, and London on, say, March 1st, than there is in the North East of England between the equivalent time periods. But what is that difference? It could be that London saw many more infections, and has thus greater immunity. But it could also be that London's default pattern of human interaction involves millions of people using the Tube every day, and they're currently not doing that, so the behaviour shift in London is greater than it is in the NE.

    As a general point, behavioural changes are equivalent to changes in biological immunity, so anything that could be attributed to a shift in immunity levels could, in principle, be attributed to a shift in behaviour patterns. In both cases, it's also important to remember what the baseline level was.

    This is not to say that you are wrong, just that there are other explanations which might fit the same facts, sufficient that we can't call a specific narrative "obvious".
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,896
    TOPPING said:

    Which means Boris must go. You have played the Cummings saga with integrity, but you can also see that that is the natural consequence of him going (and yes, when cabinet ministers - plural - are on the air defending him, it's got to be all over).

    Whatever plan Dom has (as noted by @Monkeys, he certainly has some kind of plan), it's clear that Boris has none. Hence what would drive government? A sub-par PM who loses his strategic direction. Bad and bad.

    Where does that leave government, and the country?
    It was Boris who was elected PM, not Cummings
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    IanB2 said:

    The obvious reason is that somehow London has reached a higher and significant level of immunity. The mystery is that what data there is hasn’t so far thrown up any evidence.
    Demographics? London has a younger, fitter, slimmer population than the North East. I would hazard a guess as that’s why we are shrugging it off.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    No, because this isn't (as yet) before the courts. Perjury is basically only an offence in judicial proceedings.

    I also don't really see the point. If there are important factual points in his story that are later proven to be false, he's a goner.

    But that's unlikely - however ludicrous the Barnard Bridge eye test explanation was, for example, it's not clear what "evidence" would disprove it easily (short of a family member breaking ranks, as indeed undid Huhne).
    Another witness you can show the timeline Cummnigs gave was false. Trouble is Cummings statement is a masterwork of precise ambiguity. So even if a witness showed Cumming plus family were there for 12 hours that doesn't categorically destroy him.
  • MangoMango Posts: 1,031
    Socky said:


    No one on the left understands Mrs T's no such thing as society speech.

    The meaning is pretty damn clear any time you choose to compare the UK's housing market, public education system and public health service with any of our peers in western Europe.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,795
    Dixie, Ian etc FPT

    Demographics? London has a younger, fitter, slimmer population than the North East. I would hazard a guess as that’s why we are shrugging it off.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,087
    rjk said:

    That isn't obvious to me. I think a more general version is obviously true: the faster decline in London is because there is a greater difference in conditions between London today, and London on, say, March 1st, than there is in the North East of England between the equivalent time periods. But what is that difference? It could be that London saw many more infections, and has thus greater immunity. But it could also be that London's default pattern of human interaction involves millions of people using the Tube every day, and they're currently not doing that, so the behaviour shift in London is greater than it is in the NE.

    As a general point, behavioural changes are equivalent to changes in biological immunity, so anything that could be attributed to a shift in immunity levels could, in principle, be attributed to a shift in behaviour patterns. In both cases, it's also important to remember what the baseline level was.

    This is not to say that you are wrong, just that there are other explanations which might fit the same facts, sufficient that we can't call a specific narrative "obvious".
    It is the absolute difference in conditions that is most pertinent here.
This discussion has been closed.