Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And now the Tory Brecon bar chart to try to beat off the Brexi

13567

Comments

  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217
    DavidL said:

    Is the hundreds of thousands that were to lose their jobs on the basis of the same models you place such reliance in immediately after the vote or the million+ who have gained employment since then or the hundreds of thousands of unfilled vacancies in our economy at present or some other hundreds of thousands? Its getting a little difficult to keep track.
    It is about quality jobs. There is a huge difference between working for 10 years plus at somewhere like Nissan, Airbus, Dyson, Honda and flitting from job to job on short term, minimum wage, zero hours jobs with no training. The latter are plentiful and will probably stay so after Brexit.

    I am talking about long term quality jobs that make a difference to ordinary peoples lives (and they tend to be swing voters!).
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    And there will be no more Parliamentary democracy because Prime Ministers will have licence to rule by fiat whenever they decide that Parliament is disobliging.
    No they won't. Parliament voted to leave without a deal as the legal default, and Parliament endorsed 31 October as the date for our exit to automatically occur and Parliament rejected the deal as an alternative. Proroguing Parliament won't change any laws it will just freeze in place the laws Parliament voted to pass already. No fiat.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,493
    DavidL said:

    Is the hundreds of thousands that were to lose their jobs on the basis of the same models you place such reliance in immediately after the vote or the million+ who have gained employment since then or the hundreds of thousands of unfilled vacancies in our economy at present or some other hundreds of thousands? Its getting a little difficult to keep track.
    Or even these hundreds of thousands of jobs from January 2017:

    The chief executive of the London Stock Exchange has warned the UK's vote to leave the EU poses a risk to the global financial system and could cost the City of London up to 230,000 jobs if the Government fails to provide a clear plan for post-Brexit operations.

    Speaking to MPs on the Treasury Select Committee, Xavier Rolet said LSE customers simply “would not wait” for clarity over Britain’s divorce from the EU before moving.


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-latest-news-london-city-jobs-losses-lse-boss-warning-uk-eu-a7519396.html
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,513

    Why have Parliament ever sitting again? Clearly all laws that have been passed should never be amended again.
    There is nothing stopping MPs from taking back control. That they haven't done so is not the problem of leavers such as Mr Thompson.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    HYUFD said:

    I respect democracy, I do not want to stop Brexit unlike the LDs
    They respect democracy also. It's quite a simple point - they are standing for election on a manifesto. If enough people vote for them they will implement that manifesto. I don't think you could get a purer form of democracy than that. Can they count on your vote?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Whilst some heralded the BMG poll yesterday on the headline VIs the poll also showed 53/47 remain leave and most voters want to either scrap brexit or have a second referendum than no deal.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Democracy is practised in this country at elections and increasingly in referenda too. Prorogations happen every single year as standard.

    If Parliament has already passed the laws required there is no further need for it to sit. If Parliament didn't mean the laws it has passed then maybe it shouldn't have passed them?
    You seek a return to the age of Charles I where the executive controlled when Parliament sat.

    MPs expected with reason that they would get further opportunities to look at this. This is normal. Income tax is passed annually.

    If Parliament can be prorogued because nutty zealots spuriously claiming to divine the will of the people are worried that they can't carry MPs, what's to stop the Prime Minister proroguing in advance of a vote of no confidence that he expects to lose?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,104
    tlg86 said:

    There is nothing stopping MPs from taking back control. That they haven't done so is not the problem of leavers such as Mr Thompson.
    The only reason to prologue parliament is to avoid a VONC. It is the move of despots and tyrants.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,133

    It will be over. The sky won't have fallen.

    If there is a General Election then the Lib Dems will be campaigning to say we must rejoin the EU. The Tories will be saying we have honoured the referendum and left. The Brexit Party will be defunct. Labour will be saying For The Many, Not The Jew.

    There will be no more Remainers or Leavers since there will be nothing left for us to remain in.
    It would not be over, even @HYUFD recognises that trade talks would have to start immediately, and what is that if not the WA vs BINO vs WTO discussion continued.

    I think that you considerably underestimate the constitutional crisis involved in proroguing Parliament.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017
    HYUFD said:

    More people support a Canada style FTA than support BINO overall, +20% for Canada style FTA to +7% for Norway EEA

    https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/libleave_brexit_spectrum.html

    Old polling, dear boy, old polling. But BINO does not preclude a future Canada-style FTA if that’s what people really want.

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668

    The only reason to prologue parliament is to avoid a VONC. It is the move of despots and tyrants.
    Parliament would have to be rerogued (?) at some point. There can't be no parliament for ever and at that point MPs will wreak their revenge. Or not.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Why have Parliament ever sitting again? Clearly all laws that have been passed should never be amended again.
    Parliament has voted to change the law but it hasn't occured yet. Parliament has repeatedly rejected all alternatives even at the indicative votes everything was rejected.

    So if Parliament is prorogued the laws Parliament has actually passed democratically can be implemented since Parliament failed to get any alternative already.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217

    It will be over. The sky won't have fallen.

    If there is a General Election then the Lib Dems will be campaigning to say we must rejoin the EU. The Tories will be saying we have honoured the referendum and left. The Brexit Party will be defunct. Labour will be saying For The Many, Not The Jew.

    There will be no more Remainers or Leavers since there will be nothing left for us to remain in.
    Wrong again, it is unlikely there would be a GE as the responsible course of action would be to fix the mess (or perceived mess in petrified remainer eyes if you prefer).
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,493
    edited July 2019

    It is about quality jobs. There is a huge difference between working for 10 years plus at somewhere like Nissan, Airbus, Dyson, Honda and flitting from job to job on short term, minimum wage, zero hours jobs with no training. The latter are plentiful and will probably stay so after Brexit.

    I am talking about long term quality jobs that make a difference to ordinary peoples lives (and they tend to be swing voters!).
    Perhaps you could give some data as to how many 'short term, minimum wage, zero hour jobs with no training' there are in the economy.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    No they won't. Parliament voted to leave without a deal as the legal default, and Parliament endorsed 31 October as the date for our exit to automatically occur and Parliament rejected the deal as an alternative. Proroguing Parliament won't change any laws it will just freeze in place the laws Parliament voted to pass already. No fiat.
    Governments do a lot more than just pass laws. There is no such thing as the divine right of Leavers.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017

    No they won't. Parliament voted to leave without a deal as the legal default, and Parliament endorsed 31 October as the date for our exit to automatically occur and Parliament rejected the deal as an alternative. Proroguing Parliament won't change any laws it will just freeze in place the laws Parliament voted to pass already. No fiat.

    In other words, closing down Parliament will prevent elected MPs from extending the deadline, despite parties that opposed No Deal getting most votes in the last GE.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883

    I will be keeping my membership to help rebuild the party when the retards and fuckwits leave when their slow judgement causes them to eventually realise what only a moron would not realise immediately: Boris is a fraud. Oh sorry that includes you!
    Boris will deliver Brexit, you are now committed to stop Brexit, by definition you are now a LD not a Tory
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217

    Perhaps you could give some data as to how many 'short term, minimum wage, zero hour jobs with no training' there are in the economy.
    Or perhaps you could? Are you seriously suggesting the proportion of jobs that fit those characteristics has not changed dramatically in the last twenty years?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,133
    TOPPING said:

    Parliament would have to be rerogued (?) at some point. There can't be no parliament for ever and at that point MPs will wreak their revenge. Or not.
    The other question is whether Parliament permits itself to be prorogued. Usually prorogation is by consent, for recess or an election, but this would be unprecedented in modern times.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    edited July 2019
    HYUFD said:

    Boris will deliver Brexit, you are now committed to stop Brexit, by definition you are now a LD not a Tory
    And you are a Remainer not a Leaver. As such you who are in the wrong party.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116

    It is about quality jobs. There is a huge difference between working for 10 years plus at somewhere like Nissan, Airbus, Dyson, Honda and flitting from job to job on short term, minimum wage, zero hours jobs with no training. The latter are plentiful and will probably stay so after Brexit.

    I am talking about long term quality jobs that make a difference to ordinary peoples lives (and they tend to be swing voters!).
    These are the latest figures for employment: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/employmentbyindustryemp13

    Manufacturing employment has increased for the last 3 quarters. Despite the reckless incompetence of our politicians in maximising Brexit uncertainty there is nothing other than anecdotes to support your hypothesis.

    That said we should of course go for a deal and a harmonious relationship with the EU going forward. May's deal is the only one on the table and MPs should have accepted it months ago. There are risks with no deal and it is not sensible to run them unnecessarily. But the hyperbole of the assertions of those determined not to leave undermines their case, just as it did in 2016.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    Some nice Tory on Tory action today. Keep it up chaps! The wee bachle will be in despair.

    #RuthForFM
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    You seek a return to the age of Charles I where the executive controlled when Parliament sat.

    MPs expected with reason that they would get further opportunities to look at this. This is normal. Income tax is passed annually.

    If Parliament can be prorogued because nutty zealots spuriously claiming to divine the will of the people are worried that they can't carry MPs, what's to stop the Prime Minister proroguing in advance of a vote of no confidence that he expects to lose?
    The executive has prorogued Parliament for political purposes previously. So not Charles I.

    In your scenario if that happens the executive would remain incapable of changing any laws until proroguation was lifted.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    Foxy said:

    The other question is whether Parliament permits itself to be prorogued. Usually prorogation is by consent, for recess or an election, but this would be unprecedented in modern times.
    I mean you can't say politics is boring at the moment.

    Plus there's Rory setting up shop in Starbucks across the way with his parliament.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,011
    HYUFD said:

    Boris will deliver Brexit, you are now committed to stop Brexit, by definition you are now a LD not a Tory
    Just stop attacking fellow conservatives. Your intolerance is unacceptable.

    Many of us in the party will fight against extreme dogma and economic armageddon
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883

    In other words, closing down Parliament will prevent elected MPs from extending the deadline, despite parties that opposed No Deal getting most votes in the last GE.

    The Tories and DUP won a majority of seats across the UK committed to Brexit, Deal or No Deal. Even May said 'No Deal is better than a bad deal'.

    That followed 52% of UK voters voting for Brexit at the 2016 referendum
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,034

    HYUFD is saying he doesn’t care what happens to individuals, their families, their communities and the country, just as long as the Tories win. He supports a football team that plays in blue.

    HUYFD would be advocating invading Europe if he'd seen a poll that showed it increased the Tory vote share by a couple of points
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217
    edited July 2019
    DavidL said:

    These are the latest figures for employment: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/employmentbyindustryemp13

    Manufacturing employment has increased for the last 3 quarters. Despite the reckless incompetence of our politicians in maximising Brexit uncertainty there is nothing other than anecdotes to support your hypothesis.

    That said we should of course go for a deal and a harmonious relationship with the EU going forward. May's deal is the only one on the table and MPs should have accepted it months ago. There are risks with no deal and it is not sensible to run them unnecessarily. But the hyperbole of the assertions of those determined not to leave undermines their case, just as it did in 2016.
    I am not determined not to leave. Starting from here the best course of action is to implement the WA. I am very opposed to no deal, even more so if delivered by a coup.

    If leavers want to leave, then reach out more to people like me who will accept leave with a deal but are against no deal rather than assuming we are all against everything.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    In other words, closing down Parliament will prevent elected MPs from extending the deadline, despite parties that opposed No Deal getting most votes in the last GE.

    Parties that opposed everything got the most votes. What is opposed is irrelevant what is passed is what matters.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785

    Democracy is practised in this country at elections and increasingly in referenda too. Prorogations happen every single year as standard.

    If Parliament has already passed the laws required there is no further need for it to sit. If Parliament didn't mean the laws it has passed then maybe it shouldn't have passed them?
    Indeed. This is the position of fanatics. The thin edge of the wedge to despotism. Anyone with even a vague understanding of history can see it.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785
    OllyT said:

    HUYFD would be advocating invading Europe if he'd seen a poll that showed it increased the Tory vote share by a couple of points
    Or slaughter of the first born.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,484
    HYUFD said:

    Boris will deliver Brexit, you are now committed to stop Brexit, by definition you are now a LD not a Tory
    By your definition.
    Can you point me to the Conservative party rule which makes support of Brexit mandatory for members ?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,204
    Boris has shortened to 1.03/1.04 on Betfair now.
  • MangoMango Posts: 1,031
    nichomar said:



    Marc Francois just now on sky shooting down a government minister for telling the country that many thousands of jobs are at risk if no deal him ‘he’s a remainer.......I’m going to stay up all night on 31/10 to watch the new dawn breaking on our free country’ delusional. I have just had to delete my opinion of him as I don’t use language like that.

    He is though. A complete one.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,484

    Indeed. This is the position of fanatics. The thin edge of the wedge to despotism. Anyone with even a vague understanding of history can see it.
    "If Parliament has already passed the laws required there is no further need for it to sit. ..."
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340


    The executive has prorogued Parliament for political purposes previously. So not Charles I.

    In your scenario if that happens the executive would remain incapable of changing any laws until proroguation was lifted.

    In case you hadn't noticed, that's exactly how Charles I proceeded for 11 years.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Nigelb said:

    "If Parliament has already passed the laws required there is no further need for it to sit. ..."
    Happens every single year. We are talking a short not permanent proroguation.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785

    Some nice Tory on Tory action today. Keep it up chaps! The wee bachle will be in despair.

    #RuthForFM

    How are things going for Wee Eck these days? Haven't seen the fat little wazzock for a while for some reason?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    In case you hadn't noticed, that's exactly how Charles I proceeded for 11 years.
    We aren't talking an 11 year proroguation, we are talking one of a few weeks like happens almost every summer.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883
    TOPPING said:

    And you are a Remainer not a Leaver. As such you who are in the wrong party.
    No, I now respect the will of the people and back Brexit Deal or No Deal and ideally a Canada style FTA ultimately
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217

    Parties that opposed everything got the most votes. What is opposed is irrelevant what is passed is what matters.
    What was supported was leave with a deal. Not no deal or remain so they should be taking off the table. The only leading politician pushing that was Rory Stewart.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017

    Parties that opposed everything got the most votes. What is opposed is irrelevant what is passed is what matters.

    Indeed - and what closing down Parliament does is prevents a democratically elected House of Commons passing things. Your commitment to democracy is, at best, tenuous.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883

    Just stop attacking fellow conservatives. Your intolerance is unacceptable.

    Many of us in the party will fight against extreme dogma and economic armageddon
    If stopping Brexit is the be all and end all for you you know longer are connected to the majoroty of Tory members and voters so you are better off in the LDs
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    In case you hadn't noticed, that's exactly how Charles I proceeded for 11 years.
    I am getting worried by how often we are getting references to the Civil War.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,104

    Happens every single year. We are talking a short not permanent proroguation.
    For political reasons.

    You are everything that Britons have been rightly proud to stand against throughout recent history.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,082
    TOPPING said:

    They respect democracy also. It's quite a simple point - they are standing for election on a manifesto. If enough people vote for them they will implement that manifesto. I don't think you could get a purer form of democracy than that. Can they count on your vote?
    I fear HY is a fair weather remainer.

    But what will the great Bozo do now that Portillo says the Tories don't want HY's early election?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    I am not determined not to leave. Starting from here the best course of action is to implement the WA. I am very opposed to no deal, even more so if delivered by a coup.

    If leavers want to leave, then reach out more to people like me who will accept leave with a deal but are against no deal rather than assuming we are all against everything.
    May tried that. Parliament voted three times to reject a BINO transition and to keep No Deal as the law instead.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    HYUFD said:

    No, I now respect the will of the people and back Brexit Deal or No Deal and ideally a Canada style FTA ultimately

    You are not a leaver. It is you who are in the wrong party. In the only formal expression of the issue you backed remain. You should look around for a party which reflects your views. I believe atm that would be the LibDems.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116

    I am not determined not to leave. Starting from here the best course of action is to implement the WA. I am very opposed to no deal, even more so if delivered by a coup.

    If leavers want to leave, then reach out more to people like me who will accept leave with a deal but are against no deal rather than assuming we are all against everything.
    Fair enough. We agree. I also want the WA. I also do not want no deal. I also think proroguing Parliament is undemocratic and just plain stupid.

    What we are seeing, I hope, is a negotiation by which those of a mind similar to yours in Parliament are pushed into supporting the WA because no deal under Boris is a real possibility. May tried taking no deal off the table and remainers then blocked her deal too. Its a high risk game and I understand why people are upset that we are running it at all but May tried all of the alternatives to no avail.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    We aren't talking an 11 year proroguation, we are talking one of a few weeks like happens almost every summer.
    No, not like happens almost every summer. Governments do not seek to frustrate the will of Parliament to impose an irrevocable decision on the country. It would be a serious degradation of democracy.

    And an awful precedent for others to abuse in future.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017
    HYUFD said:

    The Tories and DUP won a majority of seats across the UK committed to Brexit, Deal or No Deal. Even May said 'No Deal is better than a bad deal'.

    That followed 52% of UK voters voting for Brexit at the 2016 referendum

    A majority of the seats is not the same as a majority of the votes. The will of the people is Brexit, but no No Deal. There is a WDA that can get through the Commons, but you and your party will not support it because it means the party will split. Party before country. You support a football team.

  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,390
    HYUFD said:

    Agreed, Remainers could have backed the WDA, most refused so if it is No Deal so be it
    You guys are going to be politically obliterated... It is stark staring madness.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    For political reasons.

    You are everything that Britons have been rightly proud to stand against throughout recent history.
    It's happened before.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    Foxy said:

    It would not be over, even @HYUFD recognises that trade talks would have to start immediately, and what is that if not the WA vs BINO vs WTO discussion continued.

    I think that you considerably underestimate the constitutional crisis involved in proroguing Parliament.
    Has Parliament been prorogued against the will of the Commons since Charles I?
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,217

    May tried that. Parliament voted three times to reject a BINO transition and to keep No Deal as the law instead.
    She belatedly tried when she had already announced her resignation. Before that I was apparently a citizen of nowhere and an enemy of the people.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,082
    HYUFD said:

    If stopping Brexit is the be all and end all for you you know longer are connected to the majoroty of Tory members and voters so you are better off in the LDs
    Are you free to come canvassing in Brecon? ;)
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,493

    Or perhaps you could? Are you seriously suggesting the proportion of jobs that fit those characteristics has not changed dramatically in the last twenty years?
    For a start the number of temporary employees has fallen significantly:

    Twenty years ago 7.2% of employees were temps and 34.6 of those were because they couldn't find a full time job.

    While currently only 5.2% of employees are temps with 25.2% of those because they cannot find a full time job.

    In absolute numbers the number of involuntary temporary workers has fallen from 588 thousand twenty years ago to 375 thousand now.

    Here's the ONS data if you want to look for yourself.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/summaryoflabourmarketstatistics

    Despite the changes in the labour market and workforce over the last twenty years its not all doom and gloom, there have been advantages and new opportunities together with negative aspects.

    And despite all the media hype the likes of zero hour jobs really do make up a small proportion of employment.
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,034
    nichomar said:

    So around 23% of the population don’t give a shit what damage happens when we leave which is therefore a mandate to do it.
    And most of those are OAPs or wealthy people who don't anticipate being personally inconvenienced.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116

    No, not like happens almost every summer. Governments do not seek to frustrate the will of Parliament to impose an irrevocable decision on the country. It would be a serious degradation of democracy.

    And an awful precedent for others to abuse in future.
    I completely agree. This is madness.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883
    IanB2 said:

    I fear HY is a fair weather remainer.

    But what will the great Bozo do now that Portillo says the Tories don't want HY's early election?
    Prorugue Parliament in October to enforce Brexit by October 31st as I have said then hold an election in November once Brexit is delivered as I said earlier if there is no election before October
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883
    edited July 2019
    TOPPING said:

    You are not a leaver. It is you who are in the wrong party. In the only formal expression of the issue you backed remain. You should look around for a party which reflects your views. I believe atm that would be the LibDems.
    I back Brexit Deal or No Deal as 52% of voters voted for and I back the Tories not the LDs, I respect democracy (and even in 2016 I was almost 50 50 and would have voted Leave had membership of the Euro been on the cards)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883

    A majority of the seats is not the same as a majority of the votes. The will of the people is Brexit, but no No Deal. There is a WDA that can get through the Commons, but you and your party will not support it because it means the party will split. Party before country. You support a football team.

    The will of the people is Brexit with a FTA only ideally, not BINO
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,883
    Cicero said:

    You guys are going to be politically obliterated... It is stark staring madness.
    Only no Brexit means Tory obliteration
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Cicero said:

    You guys are going to be politically obliterated... It is stark staring madness.
    To those seeking it there is no downside apparently And if there is well that’s what you voted for.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,104
    HYUFD said:

    The will of the people is Brexit with a FTA only ideally, not BINO
    No it isn’t.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017
    HYUFD said:

    The will of the people is Brexit with a FTA only ideally, not BINO

    The will of the people is measured in public votes. These tell us that the people want Brexit but do not want it without a deal. That is all we know. The rest is opinion polls - and these tell us very different things depending on the timing and the question.

  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    DavidL said:

    You could be right.

    The way to take no deal off the table forever is to pass a deal. If Parliament can't be arsed to.do that it shouldn't complain if the legal default it bas voted to pass as law occurs instead.

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116

    For a start the number of temporary employees has fallen significantly:

    Twenty years ago 7.2% of employees were temps and 34.6 of those were because they couldn't find a full time job.

    While currently only 5.2% of employees are temps with 25.2% of those because they cannot find a full time job.

    In absolute numbers the number of involuntary temporary workers has fallen from 588 thousand twenty years ago to 375 thousand now.

    Here's the ONS data if you want to look for yourself.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/summaryoflabourmarketstatistics

    Despite the changes in the labour market and workforce over the last twenty years its not all doom and gloom, there have been advantages and new opportunities together with negative aspects.

    And despite all the media hype the likes of zero hour jobs really do make up a small proportion of employment.
    What is genuinely interesting and concerning is why this increase in full time, permanent employment is not being reflected in the productivity figures. My hypothesis is that cheap and plentiful labour has discouraged capital investment. If that is right then rising real wages should drive productivity.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,231
    Does 'to beat off the Brexit party' refer to upcoming PM Boris's attempts to woo Farage and co in aid of his very shoogly house of cards?
    (apols if anyone has already made this puerile crack)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,739
    HYUFD said:

    I back Brexit Deal or No Deal as 52% of voters voted for

    52% voted for Brexit with "no arbitrary deadline". There is no democratic mandate whatsoever for No Deal.

    https://twitter.com/PropertySpot/status/1102750703771152384
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785
    Nigelb said:

    He would like it to be so. Many of these entryist fanatics and Boris wet-dreamers have absolutely no understanding of the history of the Conservative Party and the history of their own country. They are not really Conservatives. Many are English nationalists, many are, like him, weirdly fixated with Boris Johnson, the most unqualified fool to have been leader of the Party in its history (barring IDS).
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,739
    HYUFD said:

    Only no Brexit means Tory obliteration

    Do you think the Tory party would survive a botched Brexit?
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    HYUFD said:

    Prorugue Parliament in October to enforce Brexit by October 31st as I have said then hold an election in November once Brexit is delivered as I said earlier if there is no election before October
    When was parliament last prorogued against the will of the Commons?
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785

    No, not like happens almost every summer. Governments do not seek to frustrate the will of Parliament to impose an irrevocable decision on the country. It would be a serious degradation of democracy.

    And an awful precedent for others to abuse in future.
    Indeed. It is a disgrace that any MP could be advocating such a step. And they talk about "democracy" FFS
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116
    edited July 2019

    When was parliament last prorogued against the will of the Commons?
    Charles I?

    March 1629. Didn't end well as I recall.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,419
    DavidL said:

    I completely agree. This is madness.
    Indeed. Close your eyes and imagine Chris Williamson, as leader of the commons, being able to use this new neat trick to stop MPs having any control of the executive.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785

    For political reasons.

    You are everything that Britons have been rightly proud to stand against throughout recent history.
    +1
  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276

    52% voted for Brexit with "no arbitrary deadline". There is no democratic mandate whatsoever for No Deal.

    https://twitter.com/PropertySpot/status/1102750703771152384
    But there is no way out of this mess that doesn't go through Brexit, and increasingly it looks like no deal.

    There is a large enough group of people, apparently including the bulk of the conservative party that have come to view Brexit as an article of faith. Until it's delivered in some form, they will never move on, any step back will be viewed as a stab in the back.

    Brexit may be a disaster in economic terms, but that argument is of the past, getting back to normal politics is now more important.

  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,082
    DavidL said:

    Charles I?
    Cromwell chucked them all out several times. Not sure it was a prorogration tho
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Andrew Bridget is a thick twat still selling crap like GATT 24 and all the other fairy tales they have spun, Even claims the tariffs can just be used to pay back the increased costs.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,419
    Don't forget the continuing Red on Red action folks:

    https://twitter.com/PolhomeEditor/status/1149600489358520321
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,513
    edited July 2019
    On the topic of employment, an example of one company that has expanded massively in recent years is McLaren:

    https://tinyurl.com/yxqjnxto

    Just look at how many jobs are going. That said, I am told that those who put the road cars together don't get paid a particularly good wage.
  • DavidL said:

    What is genuinely interesting and concerning is why this increase in full time, permanent employment is not being reflected in the productivity figures. My hypothesis is that cheap and plentiful labour has discouraged capital investment. If that is right then rising real wages should drive productivity.
    My view as well. A key driver of the Industrial Revolution was the relatively expensive wages and scarcity of artisans

  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,739

    But there is no way out of this mess that doesn't go through Brexit, and increasingly it looks like no deal.

    There is a large enough group of people, apparently including the bulk of the conservative party that have come to view Brexit as an article of faith. Until it's delivered in some form, they will never move on, any step back will be viewed as a stab in the back.

    Brexit may be a disaster in economic terms, but that argument is of the past, getting back to normal politics is now more important.
    There is another way out: the break up of the UK.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281

    How are things going for Wee Eck these days? Haven't seen the fat little wazzock for a while for some reason?
    We'll be hearing plenty later this year.....

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/legal-system-robust-enough-to-handle-pressure-of-alex-salmond-case-1-4862851
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,017

    But there is no way out of this mess that doesn't go through Brexit, and increasingly it looks like no deal.

    There is a large enough group of people, apparently including the bulk of the conservative party that have come to view Brexit as an article of faith. Until it's delivered in some form, they will never move on, any step back will be viewed as a stab in the back.

    Brexit may be a disaster in economic terms, but that argument is of the past, getting back to normal politics is now more important.

    A No Deal Brexit will not return us to normal politics. If that is really what Tories believe they are in for a very rude awakening.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116
    IanB2 said:

    Cromwell chucked them all out several times. Not sure it was a prorogration tho
    Close enough for government work. Much more recent then.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785
    IanB2 said:

  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    Cyclefree said:

    Note that she uses her health to try and deflect criticism but shows no interest in or concern for the health of those junior staff working for the party. Nor does she criticise those who have attacked those staff suffering mental health problems as a result of the culture she presided over.

    Despicable.
    Hypocrite.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281
    Boris being economical with the actualité? Surely not?

    https://twitter.com/FullFact/status/1149609599231676421
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668
    HYUFD said:

    I back Brexit Deal or No Deal as 52% of voters voted for and I back the Tories not the LDs, I respect democracy (and even in 2016 I was almost 50 50 and would have voted Leave had membership of the Euro been on the cards)
    woulda shoulda coulda. In the only formal register of votes you voted Remain. Get thee to the LDs.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,785

    Don't forget the continuing Red on Red action folks:

    https://twitter.com/PolhomeEditor/status/1149600489358520321

    Ah, appeasing or supporting anti-Semitism is OK if you are ill, it seems
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,668

    Hypocrite.

    He hath risen!

    Good morrow, fair Corbynista. How's it hanging?
  • rural_voterrural_voter Posts: 2,038
    Regarding this comment

    "As a Remainer you are the one who should be voting LD."

    it was the Tory party which took us into the EEC which became the EU. Half the Labour party was opposed to membership, along with I think ~5-10% of Tories. The Liberals were always strongly in favour of membership but were not at all the same party.

    Heath or Macmillan never proposed a Con-Lib merger with Thorpe or Grimond. It would have been ridiculous. Both parties had their own coherent policies.

    The wing of the 'Tory' party which now opposes EU membership and advocates a flat tax/small state future should advocate PR and form a different political party, in order to stop breaching consumer legislation on misrepresentation.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116

    Boris being economical with the actualité? Surely not?

    https://twitter.com/FullFact/status/1149609599231676421

    That's just partisan rubbish. The WA does keep us in the SM and Customs Union for the transitional period. Those are some of its attractions. It also sets the context in which the future relationship will be negotiated. I suspect that there will be a lot of pressure to agree to stay in alignment with the regulation of the SM for untrammeled access, for example.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    DavidL said:



    Close enough for government work. Much more recent then.

    So we can conclude that those who advocate pushing through no deal by prorogation are advocating a course of action which has not been used since the 17th century and when it was last used it led to a civil war.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,104
    TOPPING said:

    He hath risen!

    Good morrow, fair Corbynista. How's it hanging?
    They are obviously early for their 10:30 shift.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,116
    TOPPING said:

    He hath risen!

    Good morrow, fair Corbynista. How's it hanging?
    Hanging is far too good for non believers.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,190

    Ah, appeasing or supporting anti-Semitism is OK if you are ill, it seems
    When Tom leaves the Party, Jeremy might as well lock the door, close the curtains and turn the lights off.
This discussion has been closed.