politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Bercow going in the summer opens the way for a Buckingham by-e

The news that John Bercow is bowing to the inevitable and planning to stand down in the summer opens up the prospect of what could be a humdinger of a by-election. For it is hard seeing him continuing as an MP when he ceases to be Speaker.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
https://twitter.com/guardiannews/status/1052225614512500736
You can tell that's what they're planning because *they keep saying it*.
Though I realize that listening to what the EU are saying is an idea that seems to have no traction whatsoever in Maybot's bunker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RghKdGn8h5A
“The Speaker has made no announcement about his leaving date. He was elected by the House in 2017 for the course of the Parliament. In the event he has anything to say on his future plans, he will make an announcement to the House first.”
As for the Irish Border its pretty simple. The EU Red Line is legally our red line. Politically it will finish May, but the alternative finishes the union, the peace process or possibly both. The UK will move because it has to.
This will be the EU response to the panto in the HoC on Monday. We really mean it too (honest). Something has to give or no deal it is and no one really wants that.
HofC needs a proper HR department with a Code of Conduct. bullying, groping and abusive behaviour needs to be dealt with as it is in any other workplace. Not used by Whips as ammunition.
Whilst Bercow takes the flak, there is no publicity about, or naming of, MPs and staff implicated in the report
For Labour to say they would have played things differently, they would have had to have waved cheerio to Northern Ireland. Will they admit that? I'm thinking no.
Meanwhile, May gets political cover to walk away, still saying "This is the unilateral decision of the EU. They have not negotiated in good faith. Meanwhile, Chequers is still on the table....".
The Speaker has not announced that he will be resigning next June. He originally said he would stand down by last June but instead decided to stay on indefinitely.
Thirdly, a lot of focus has been on pain of no deal, chaos to be untangled, but that’s not the key bit of no deal, it’s the place of antagonism and competition both parties are left in with no deal that’s ultimately the problem for EU and Ireland, a border not just in Irish Sea, but all round Britain’s coast.
Of course there is going to be a deal.
It’s not the 1990s any more. Con hold.
It’s quite clear May can go no further on this, and nor should she.
https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-craig-mackinlay-overspent-on-campaign-to-beat-nigel-farage-11527244
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gACCCmFKP80
And I don't believe people generally are as opposed to no deal as they claim they are. The actions on both sides prove it to be a lie, given the hostility to compromise.
If I were her spin doctor i would place her in a nearby restaurant where the world can see her eating a simple meal alone.
I've come out of two Brexit planning sessions with several dozen people close to the various sides here and in Brussels. The majority view is that the outcome will be May going for a customs union with a statement of intent to end it but nothing binding, and that she'll get that through Parliament - but we'll then spend the next two years squabbling over what it means. The minority view is that no resolution is possible and there will simply be a basic agreement on basic cooperation while discussions continue after Brexit. Either way, we should expect to be still talking about this in 2020.
If May cannot get the EU off the NI-only backstop she will not even be able to do a sellout deal.
Her aim is obviously to get to the all-UK backstop which is 'temporary' but ends based on circumstances that the UK cannot actually control. I don't think this will work either. There is too much focus on it and what it means.
Speaker John Bercow 34,299 65.1% +0.6%
Green Michael Sheppard 8,574 16.3% +2.5%
Independent Scott Raven 5,638 10.7% +10.7%
UKIP Brian Mapletoft 4,168 7.9% -13.8%
So, May will have the option of declaring that there is no possible deal and get the Party and the Nation united against the EU's impossible demands, or she can talk tough and then immediately send Robbins back to make yet more concessions. I think we know what she will do.
He's a former member of the Monday Club.
Astonished Labour MPs are such a fan of that bellend.
Bercow can of course remain as Sp0eaker until a time of his choosing so the poor electors of Buckingham will be bombarded by wonderful LD and disappointingly poor Conservative leaflets (no bias of course) for a long period.
To be fair, the LDs in modern times have no record in Buckingham - I don't think they've been second since 1992 which says a lot. It's not a Richmond Park but by next summer, politics could look very different.
As for matters A50, the dance continues but we can already see the pro-Government line emerging. It will be to wrap May in the Union Jack and blame the "perfidious Europeans" for everything. It will be all to save "our precious Union" which seems to matter to Theresa May and some woman in Northern Ireland but probably not to a lot of other people.
I admit when I was considering the EU Referendum back in 2016 I didn't give Northern Ireland the slightest thought.
https://order-order.com/2014/07/25/full-sunday-sport-emailwho-the-hell-puts-a-hyphen-in-bellend/
2020: The Election They Wish They'd Never Won
I hope this is a one off, if you're going to start regularly commuting on that train journey you'll go mad.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7501794/this-is-your-brexit-boudicca-moment-theresa-its-time-to-say-on-your-way-barnier-like-up-yours-delors/
Unfortunately, if adopted, this is likely to be quite effective for a short while in tory/lab polling terms. And hence another barrier to the pusillanimous erg. Possibly long enough for the suggested 5y CU to slide thro like a snake in the grass.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/10/15/eight-cabinet-ministers-concerns-mays-backstop-plan-attend-andrea/amp/
The agreed deal is UK stays in CU. I know yourself speaking for hard line leavers have objections to that type of vassal state Brexit, but they can to some extent be mitigated in further agreements, also your concerns would lose in the commons and in a ref put to the country yes or no on the deal.
Sorry about that old bean, but it’s going to happen.
The first train I couldn't get on board as it was rammed, so went to Meadowhall, and boarded the next train, where there would be guaranteed seats.
Oh how wrong I was, I think I got a seat at Retford.
https://twitter.com/StormyDaniels/status/1052224021855637505
first they investigate LePen and ask her to undergo a psychiatic examination
now theyve raided Melenchon;s home and party offices
http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/le-scan/2018/10/16/25001-20181016ARTFIG00106-perquisition-au-domicile-de-jean-luc-melenchon.php
We did not vote to Leave and take back control just to give control to a bunch of homophobic god bothering creationists.
It is the ERG that will object more to a never-ending UKEU Customs Union.
We did not vote to Leave and take back control but only of a fraction of the UK and give the leave the other fraction behind in the EU.
We all leave together. On this the DUP are eminently reasonable.
The fact that the very reasonable openly gay Ruth Davidson is on the same page as the "homophobic god bothering creationists" should say something.
They will insist on SM+CU, which means the four freedoms. The other option is to split off NI and have CETA. This has always been their (totally unreasonable) position. Your option is neither of these, so will not be available.
DUP only object if UK is divided ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9uHhLe6WE0
The CU and SM have to be explicitly permanent to pass the DUP. Which fouls the ERG (as you said)
Its the deadlock that does for the proposal in the original post..