politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » YouGov finds TMay rated about the same as Major, ahead of Blai

Options
System
System Posts: 12,578
edited July 2018 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » YouGov finds TMay rated about the same as Major, ahead of Blair and Brown but behind Cameron

Above is from some new polling just issued by YouGov in which those surveyed were asked to rate TMay against the three preceding PMs.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • CarlottaVance
    CarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    First!
  • Unlike Theresa May
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    Bring back Dave.

    Dave is the best.

    I miss Dave.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    Longing for simpler times when all we had to worry about was what farm animals the PM had sexually violated.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    "YouGov polled 1627 Screaming Eagles"
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    Longing for simpler times when all we had to worry about was what farm animals the PM had sexually violated.

    That story was fake news from Isabel Oakeshott.

    Those were the days.
  • AndyJS
    AndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited July 2018
    "Met Office
    ‏Verified account @metoffice

    UPDATE: Heathrow has just hit 35 °C. Will this be the top temperature of the day, or is there more to come?
    3:19 PM - 26 Jul 2018"
  • The_Apocalypse
    The_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    ‘Neither of these’ did really well in that poll :lol:
  • Monkeys
    Monkeys Posts: 798
    Gordon Brown ahead with Labour voters. May doing better with Leave voters.
  • RobinWiggs
    RobinWiggs Posts: 621
    All of the others are viewed through the retrospectoscope (even Cameron).

    May's long term rating is entirely dependent upon the outcome over the next 9 months. If she pulls it off she may well improve her rating. If she fumbles it she will be down there with Brown but still ahead of the new PM Corbyn.
  • Morris_Dancer
    Morris_Dancer Posts: 62,742
    Mr. Wiggs, maybe we could call that red shift, with potential future leaders seen with blue shift (as per the Doppler Effect)?
  • CarlottaVance
    CarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    Oldies for Mrs May!

    May lead vs Blair: 65+: +40

    Youngsters for war criminals Blair:

    May lead vs Blair: 18-24: -20

    This group also breaks heavily for Cameron (May vs Cameron; -25) while their elders: +24

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/y44hee0b42/Internal_Results_180724_OldPM_w.pdf

    As for Balir:

    The evil that men do lives after them;
    The good is oft interrèd with their bones.
  • Stark_Dawning
    Stark_Dawning Posts: 10,202
    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?
  • tlg86
    tlg86 Posts: 26,950

    ‘Neither of these’ did really well in that poll :lol:

    Pretty pointless to put her up against Maggie.
  • William_H
    William_H Posts: 346
    It seems like these results in large part reflect Labour voters choosing "neither". If you didn't allow a neither option the results would probably be quite different.
  • RobinWiggs
    RobinWiggs Posts: 621
    edited July 2018

    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?

    No, sadly the Tories deserved to lose heavily. They were intellectually exhausted after 18 years continuous government. At the time (although I disagreed with it) the Labour party seemed to have the ideas.

    Perhaps it was because they had the time and space to develop them, whilst opposing a government tying itself up in internecine squabbles over Europe.

    Thank goodness no governing party would be foolish enough to repeat the same mistake.
  • John_M
    John_M Posts: 7,503
    edited July 2018

    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?

    The Tories were very tired by '97. It's probably not much more complicated than that. I won't vote for them at the next GE for much the same reason. We'll have had twelve years; that's plenty. Seventeen would be unhealthy, Corbyn notwithstanding.

    *edit* Johnny can't count. Bad Johnny.
  • Casino_Royale
    Casino_Royale Posts: 63,687
    edited July 2018
    Blair is not just about Iraq, although that was the straw that broke the camels back.

    It’s because he’s now recognised to be a universal weasel.
  • Morris_Dancer
    Morris_Dancer Posts: 62,742
    Mr. M, better a tired, lacklustre government than one led by Corbyn.
  • AlastairMeeks
    AlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The difficulty is that different Prime Ministers are suited to different times. I thought Gordon Brown was a dismal Prime Minister, but the current requirements of government are ideally suited to his talents.

    In the abstract with nothing much going on I'd probably give the order:

    Cameron
    Blair
    Major
    Brown
    May

    But as of today's date I'd probably give the order:

    Brown
    May
    Major
    Blair
    Cameron
  • John_M
    John_M Posts: 7,503

    Mr. M, better a tired, lacklustre government than one led by Corbyn.

    You are, of course, entitled to believe that Mr Dancer.
  • Tissue_Price
    Tissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Those Labour splits for "Neither" when compared to Blair and Brown are extraordinary. An utterly changed party.

    (Quite what "neither" is doing as an option here, I'm not sure, but that's another question.)
  • Morris_Dancer
    Morris_Dancer Posts: 62,742
    Mr. M, it's not just my belief. So sayeth the octo-lemur who, we ought not forget, accurately predicted the percentages of the EU referendum.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    You think the Tories were exhausted in 1997, just imagine how exhausted they'll be if they manage to scrape and crawl all the way to 2022.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    What are people praying for?

    For the Lord to intervene in the UK judicial system to pervert the course of justice?
  • The_Apocalypse
    The_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830

    Those Labour splits for "Neither" when compared to Blair and Brown are extraordinary. An utterly changed party.

    (Quite what "neither" is doing as an option here, I'm not sure, but that's another question.)

    Is it really that ‘changed’? New Labour was to the right of Labour members and was likely to the right of Labour voters as well. Blair started becoming an unpopular figure from 2003, Brown from 2008. I mean when you have Blair doing things like this: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/11346397/How-Tony-Blair-became-a-darling-of-the-Republicans.html it’s no wonder he’s not exactly massively beloved by Labour supporters. Brown is the more curious one in some respects: he’s tried to play up to being more to the left than he probably is as of late, and it’s not really working.
  • RobinWiggs
    RobinWiggs Posts: 621
    edited July 2018

    You think the Tories were exhausted in 1997, just imagine how exhausted they'll be if they manage to scrape and crawl all the way to 2022.

    12 years is nothing compared to the intellectual paucity that was presented in 1997. This government is distracted by Brexit, but not yet tired of governing.

    With Brexit cleared in 2019, there is a possibility that there may be a renewed vigour as they turn their attention and thinking to more domestic issues. With that possibility I can see them constructing a programme for government that resonates against the extremes of a socialist alternative from Labour.

    However, that requires them to successfully clear Brexit and also for a new central grouping not to emerge.

    Almost any outcome is possible over the next 4 years.
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045
    Surely it will be for the jury to decide if she can continue to represent her constituents?
  • David_Evershed
    David_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    John Major got his Maastrict policy through parliament and the EU.

    Will May get Chequers minus through parliament and the EU?
  • Tissue_Price
    Tissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Sandpit said:

    Surely it will be for the jury to decide if she can continue to represent her constituents?
    Perhaps they will be influenced in the way @grabcocque suggests.
  • Omnium
    Omnium Posts: 11,763

    What are people praying for?

    For the Lord to intervene in the UK judicial system to pervert the course of justice?
    He's big on speeding fines
  • David_Evershed
    David_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Sandpit said:

    Surely it will be for the jury to decide if she can continue to represent her constituents?
    No - it will be a sentencing decision of the judge.

    She can continue in parliament if her sentence (assuming she is found guilty) is one year or less.

    More than a year and she cannot sit in parliament.
  • Tissue_Price
    Tissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited July 2018

    Sandpit said:

    Surely it will be for the jury to decide if she can continue to represent her constituents?
    No - it will be a sentencing decision of the judge.

    She can continue in parliament if her sentence (assuming she is found guilty) is one year or less.

    More than a year and she cannot sit in parliament.
    She'll surely be recalled if sent to prison at all. [So she'll probably resign first.]
  • Benpointer
    Benpointer Posts: 35,627

    You think the Tories were exhausted in 1997, just imagine how exhausted they'll be if they manage to scrape and crawl all the way to 2022.

    12 years is nothing compared to the intellectual paucity that was presented in 1997. This government is distracted by Brexit, but not yet tired of governing.

    With Brexit cleared in 2019, there is a possibility that there may be a renewed vigour as they turn their attention and thinking to more domestic issues. With that possibility I can see them constructing a programme for government that resonates against the extremes of a socialist alternative from Labour.

    However, that requires them to successfully clear Brexit and also for a new central grouping not to emerge.

    Almost any outcome is possible over the next 4 years.
    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234


    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:

    Bring back national service, concerted push to keep China British.
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045

    Sandpit said:

    Surely it will be for the jury to decide if she can continue to represent her constituents?
    No - it will be a sentencing decision of the judge.

    She can continue in parliament if her sentence (assuming she is found guilty) is one year or less.

    More than a year and she cannot sit in parliament.
    She'll surely be recalled if sent to prison at all. [So she'll probably resign first.]
    Indeed. Huhne resigned on the day he plead guilty, realising correctly that it was untenable for someone convicted of interfering with the law to sit in Parliament.

    This sort of case is exactly why the recall law was introduced, even though it got somewhat watered down from the original proposal.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813
    Ms Onasanya has a right to a trial so let's all wait for the verdict before requesting the market from @Shadsy ^_~
  • CarlottaVance
    CarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    Interestingly the lower orders (C2DE- ed.) prefer May to the alternatives with the exception of Cameron, where its a tie. On the other hand their betters (ABC1 - ed.) prefer Major & Cameron to May. They're also less agin Blair (-4 vs -8).
  • The_Apocalypse
    The_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830

    You think the Tories were exhausted in 1997, just imagine how exhausted they'll be if they manage to scrape and crawl all the way to 2022.

    12 years is nothing compared to the intellectual paucity that was presented in 1997. This government is distracted by Brexit, but not yet tired of governing.

    With Brexit cleared in 2019, there is a possibility that there may be a renewed vigour as they turn their attention and thinking to more domestic issues. With that possibility I can see them constructing a programme for government that resonates against the extremes of a socialist alternative from Labour.

    However, that requires them to successfully clear Brexit and also for a new central grouping not to emerge.

    Almost any outcome is possible over the next 4 years.
    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:
    Speaking of Fox hunting, I’ll never forget this:
    https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/876403565220200449?s=20
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234


    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:

    Speaking of Fox hunting, I’ll never forget this:
    https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/876403565220200449?s=20

    Fox hunting is one of those totemic issues that reinforces all the very worst stereotypes of Tories in the minds of non-Tories. That of the braying horseback toff revelling in gratuitous cruelty towards a terrified creature.

    It's an enduring image. For the life of me of me I can't understand why it's an image Tories insist on reinforcing.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813
    edited July 2018


    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:

    Speaking of Fox hunting, I’ll never forget this:
    https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/876403565220200449?s=20
    Fox hunting is one of those totemic issues that reinforces all the very worst stereotypes of Tories in the minds of non-Tories. That of the braying horseback toff revelling in gratuitous cruelty towards a terrified creature.

    It's an enduring image. For the life of me of me I can't understand why it's an image Tories insist on reinforcing.
    One of my friends would have voted Tory, but for this issue.
  • oxfordsimon
    oxfordsimon Posts: 5,845
    She should keep away from all social media until the trial is over.

    This is just inappropriate.
  • The_Apocalypse
    The_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    @grabcocque Yep, it conjures up the ‘nasty party’ image of the Tories for many people. The dementia tax probably didn’t help on that score as well.
  • John_M
    John_M Posts: 7,503
    edited July 2018
    The blockquotes melted in the heat.

    Monmouthshire hunt was mostly plebs. I suppose it might be different in Lloegr.
  • dixiedean
    dixiedean Posts: 30,316


    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:

    Speaking of Fox hunting, I’ll never forget this:
    https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/876403565220200449?s=20
    Fox hunting is one of those totemic issues that reinforces all the very worst stereotypes of Tories in the minds of non-Tories. That of the braying horseback toff revelling in gratuitous cruelty towards a terrified creature.

    It's an enduring image. For the life of me of me I can't understand why it's an image Tories insist on reinforcing.

    The funding and activists to deliver leaflets that the pro hunt lobby provide may play a part.
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045
    Sounds like the EU Parliament might finally have an opposition worthy of the name.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813
    dixiedean said:


    Foxhunting? Grammar schools maybe? :wink:

    Speaking of Fox hunting, I’ll never forget this:
    https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/876403565220200449?s=20
    Fox hunting is one of those totemic issues that reinforces all the very worst stereotypes of Tories in the minds of non-Tories. That of the braying horseback toff revelling in gratuitous cruelty towards a terrified creature.

    It's an enduring image. For the life of me of me I can't understand why it's an image Tories insist on reinforcing.
    The funding and activists to deliver leaflets that the pro hunt lobby provide may play a part.
    Sort the Blockquotes people.
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234
    Sandpit said:

    Sounds like the EU Parliament might finally have an opposition worthy of the name.
    Unlikely. The federalist EPP and S&D blocs are still projected to end up with around 2/3rds of the seats.
  • ralphmalph
    ralphmalph Posts: 2,201
    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Coupled with the poorly spun manifesto pledge for the ivory ban being dropped.

    There were more than one or two candidates and MPs who were delighted when Victoria Borwick lost her seat.
  • rottenborough
    rottenborough Posts: 66,860

    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?

    No, sadly the Tories deserved to lose heavily. They were intellectually exhausted after 18 years continuous government. At the time (although I disagreed with it) the Labour party seemed to have the ideas.

    Perhaps it was because they had the time and space to develop them, whilst opposing a government tying itself up in internecine squabbles over Europe.

    Thank goodness no governing party would be foolish enough to repeat the same mistake.
    Mostly forgotten now, but at the time, Blair, Brown and Labour absolutely looked and sounded like a government in waiting. Years of preparation had gone into bomb-proofing policy, honing messages, laying the ground for the first months in office. The public had accepted the argument that the public realm had been left to rot and needed urgent attention. Compared to the tired, corrupted, split, Tories opposite, it was a no brainer.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    edited July 2018

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
  • Tykejohnno
    Tykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
  • MarqueeMark
    MarqueeMark Posts: 55,458

    Blair is not just about Iraq, although that was the straw that broke the camels back.

    It’s because he’s now recognised to be a universal weasel.

    *weasels scurry off to consult libel lawyer....*
  • grabcocque
    grabcocque Posts: 4,234

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
    A bad manifesto can be papered over with a good campaign. See, for example, Jeremy Corbyn.
  • ralphmalph
    ralphmalph Posts: 2,201

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
    I have not seen an official statistic but I have seen a figure of 30% of our trade with the EU. The issues are is this figure just the chunnel or is the figure Dover ferries as well.
    But it is 30% of say 45% of our trade so 13.5%. with the above caveats.
  • Tykejohnno
    Tykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
    A bad manifesto can be papered over with a good campaign. See, for example, Jeremy Corbyn.
    If you have someone who is good at campaigning,I heard lots on how good Theresa was a good campaigner,didn't see much of it at the last GE.
  • Pulpstar
    Pulpstar Posts: 79,813

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
    A bad manifesto can be papered over with a good campaign. See, for example, Jeremy Corbyn.
    There wasn't anything wrong with Labour's manifesto, politically speaking - it delivered the left en bloc.
  • AndyJS
    AndyJS Posts: 29,395

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    I thought it was the dementia tax proposal.
  • Benpointer
    Benpointer Posts: 35,627

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
    A bad manifesto can be papered over with a good campaign. See, for example, Jeremy Corbyn.
    I disagree re the Labour manifesto - it was much better than I expected and very nearly led me to vote for them.
  • Tykejohnno
    Tykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Was that before the Tory manifesto ?

    I agree with you,the day it came out I put my head in my hands.
    A bad manifesto can be papered over with a good campaign. See, for example, Jeremy Corbyn.
    If you have someone who is good at campaigning,I heard lots on how good Theresa was a good campaigner,didn't see much of it at the last GE.
    And the Tory manifesto on the day of the reveal was tested on radio 5 with callers,it went down like a bucket of sick.

    I know it was a small sample but that made me take notice something was wrong.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
    I have not seen an official statistic but I have seen a figure of 30% of our trade with the EU. The issues are is this figure just the chunnel or is the figure Dover ferries as well.
    But it is 30% of say 45% of our trade so 13.5%. with the above caveats.
    So you don’t know.
  • AlastairMeeks
    AlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
    I have not seen an official statistic but I have seen a figure of 30% of our trade with the EU. The issues are is this figure just the chunnel or is the figure Dover ferries as well.
    But it is 30% of say 45% of our trade so 13.5%. with the above caveats.
    https://www.getlinkgroup.com/uploadedFiles/assets-uk/the-channel-tunnel/180604-EY-Channel-Tunnel-Footprint-Report.pdf

    "The total value of exports from the EU to the UK transported through the Channel Tunnel in 2016 was €69.0bn

    This represents 21% of the total value of EU exports to the UK."
  • ralphmalph
    ralphmalph Posts: 2,201

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
    I have not seen an official statistic but I have seen a figure of 30% of our trade with the EU. The issues are is this figure just the chunnel or is the figure Dover ferries as well.
    But it is 30% of say 45% of our trade so 13.5%. with the above caveats.
    So you don’t know.
    Correct, but I have never said I did.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806
    edited July 2018

    https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/traveller-info/latest/

    Eurotunnel is currently experiencing 4 hour delays. A 2 min delay means miles of queues. Also, Britain's JIT manufacturers will no doubt have sent the workforce home already.

    Get prepared now the supermarkets will have no food tomorrow, panic buy now.

    Or just keep chilling out and enjoy the weather.

    How much of our imports come through the Chunnel?

    Especially what percentage of our food imports come through there?
    I have not seen an official statistic but I have seen a figure of 30% of our trade with the EU. The issues are is this figure just the chunnel or is the figure Dover ferries as well.
    But it is 30% of say 45% of our trade so 13.5%. with the above caveats.
    So you don’t know.
    Correct, but I have never said I did.
    Your original post inferred you did re the food shortages.

    By my rough calculations around 8% of food and drink imports come via the Chunnel.

    https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Economic_footprint_of_the_Channel_Tunnel_fixed_link/$File/Channel Tunnel EN light.pdf

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-statistics-pocketbook-2017/food-statistics-in-your-pocket-2017-global-and-uk-supply
  • NickPalmer
    NickPalmer Posts: 21,724
    dixiedean said:



    The funding and activists to deliver leaflets that the pro hunt lobby provide may play a part.

    The only time I had a death threat was from a hunt supporter. Rather endearingly, he provided his name and address, saving tiresome investigative time. The fuzz reasoned with him gently and I heard nothing further. But it did make me feel brave and virtuous, defying the mighty assassins to do my bit for foxhood. :)
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076
    edited July 2018
    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    Liam must have been relieved :)
  • Sandpit
    Sandpit Posts: 56,045
    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    You missed the caveat before that?

    In electoral terms he is also the most successful leader in his party’s history
  • Bromptonaut
    Bromptonaut Posts: 1,113
    Sandpit said:

    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
    BRINO. That’s something the Tory party can rally around.

    Oh wait...
  • williamglenn
    williamglenn Posts: 56,289
    Sandpit said:

    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
    Customs union it is.
  • bondegezou
    bondegezou Posts: 15,133
    The differences between Major, Brown and Blair, and maybe Cameron too, are all margin of error stuff. Are we making too much of this?
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    You missed the caveat before that?

    In electoral terms he is also the most successful Snake-oil Merchant in his party’s history
    Corrected it for you :)

    But Maggie's achievement still stands.
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938
    edited July 2018
    Barnier seems to have just pulled the plug on Theresa May?
  • MikeSmithson
    MikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    Please read what I wrote before attacking it. You've taken half a sentence with the qualification.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076
    GIN1138 said:

    Barnier seems to have just pulled the plug on Theresa May?

    Barnier or Barmier? :lol:
  • GIN1138
    GIN1138 Posts: 22,938
    edited July 2018

    The differences between Major, Brown and Blair, and maybe Cameron too, are all margin of error stuff. Are we making too much of this?

    PB making too much of polling? :D
  • Cyclefree
    Cyclefree Posts: 25,709
    AndyJS said:

    "Met Office
    ‏Verified account @metoffice

    UPDATE: Heathrow has just hit 35 °C. Will this be the top temperature of the day, or is there more to come?
    3:19 PM - 26 Jul 2018"

    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?

    No, sadly the Tories deserved to lose heavily. They were intellectually exhausted after 18 years continuous government. At the time (although I disagreed with it) the Labour party seemed to have the ideas.

    Perhaps it was because they had the time and space to develop them, whilst opposing a government tying itself up in internecine squabbles over Europe.

    Thank goodness no governing party would be foolish enough to repeat the same mistake.
    Mostly forgotten now, but at the time, Blair, Brown and Labour absolutely looked and sounded like a government in waiting. Years of preparation had gone into bomb-proofing policy, honing messages, laying the ground for the first months in office. The public had accepted the argument that the public realm had been left to rot and needed urgent attention. Compared to the tired, corrupted, split, Tories opposite, it was a no brainer.
    And despite all that preparation, look at how little of real substance was actually attempted let alone achieved.
  • Bromptonaut
    Bromptonaut Posts: 1,113

    Sandpit said:

    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
    Customs union it is.
    Norway plus.

    I don’t recommend the brown cheese though.
  • MikeSmithson
    MikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    The last time that any party won a working majority was Blair in 2005. The last time the Tories did it was Thatcher in 1987 - 31 years ago.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    Please read what I wrote before attacking it. You've taken half a sentence with the qualification.
    You "could of" wrote:

    In electoral terms he is also the most successful Labour leader in history, and there are no matches in modern time for the three successive general election victories for his Party.
  • rottenborough
    rottenborough Posts: 66,860
    Cyclefree said:

    AndyJS said:

    "Met Office
    ‏Verified account @metoffice

    UPDATE: Heathrow has just hit 35 °C. Will this be the top temperature of the day, or is there more to come?
    3:19 PM - 26 Jul 2018"

    Yes, Gentleman John probably deserved to lose in 1997, but did he really deserve the absolute political annihilation that was meted out to him? Was it the British public having one of its mad moments?

    No, sadly the Tories deserved to lose heavily. They were intellectually exhausted after 18 years continuous government. At the time (although I disagreed with it) the Labour party seemed to have the ideas.

    Perhaps it was because they had the time and space to develop them, whilst opposing a government tying itself up in internecine squabbles over Europe.

    Thank goodness no governing party would be foolish enough to repeat the same mistake.
    Mostly forgotten now, but at the time, Blair, Brown and Labour absolutely looked and sounded like a government in waiting. Years of preparation had gone into bomb-proofing policy, honing messages, laying the ground for the first months in office. The public had accepted the argument that the public realm had been left to rot and needed urgent attention. Compared to the tired, corrupted, split, Tories opposite, it was a no brainer.
    And despite all that preparation, look at how little of real substance was actually attempted let alone achieved.
    The problem was over caution.

    I doubt that will be an issue with the Corbyn-fest.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    The last time that any party won a working majority was Blair in 2005. The last time the Tories did it was Thatcher in 1987 - 31 years ago.
    Of course, of course, but there hasn't been a Labour PM since 2010. Correct?
  • TheScreamingEagles
    TheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,806

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    Please read what I wrote before attacking it. You've taken half a sentence with the qualification.
    You "could of" wrote:

    In electoral terms he is also the most successful Labour leader in history, and there are no matches in modern time for the three successive general election victories for his Party.
    English isn’t your first language is it?

    Could of????

    For those of whose first language is English it is ‘could have’
  • williamglenn
    williamglenn Posts: 56,289
    If only the Brexiteers had reckoned with Paddy Power before they started, things may have been different. ;)
  • rpjs
    rpjs Posts: 3,787

    Sandpit said:

    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
    Customs union it is.
    Norway plus.

    I don’t recommend the brown cheese though.
    I do. Mmm, brunost. There used to be a cheese shop down Twickenham way that sold it.
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076

    "there are no matches in modern time for his three successive general election victories."

    Maggie won three on the trot!

    Please read what I wrote before attacking it. You've taken half a sentence with the qualification.
    You "could of" wrote:

    In electoral terms he is also the most successful Labour leader in history, and there are no matches in modern time for the three successive general election victories for his Party.
    English isn’t your first language is it?

    Could of????

    For those of whose first language is English it is ‘could have’
    Didn't you notice the quotation marks? It was a joke, which Mr Spock reassures us is "a story with a humorous climax".
  • rottenborough
    rottenborough Posts: 66,860
    AndyJS said:

    May’s proposal to reintroduce fox hunting with a free vote was the single most viral topic of the 2017 election.

    It's the moment everything started to go horribly wrong.

    I thought it was the dementia tax proposal.
    Double whammy. Foxhunting killed any lingering chances of the youth voting Tory (they like animals) and the dementia tax killed the middle aged from voting tory (we want/need granny's house thanks).
  • Sunil_Prasannan
    Sunil_Prasannan Posts: 55,076
    rpjs said:

    Sandpit said:

    Good news, that was the silliest and most unworkable bit of the Chequers proposal.

    At least Barnier is talking rather than clock-watching, let’s work out what the deal looks like and get on with it.
    Customs union it is.
    Norway plus.

    I don’t recommend the brown cheese though.
    I do. Mmm, brunost. There used to be a cheese shop down Twickenham way that sold it.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3KBuQHHKx0
  • IanB2
    IanB2 Posts: 52,310
    Those LibDem and Labour voters preferring Cameron are probably preferring the pre-referendum environment rather than making a judgement on his and her characters. It's far too early and wrapped up with ongoing politics to be asking people to judge these leaders for posterity.
  • JosiasJessop
    JosiasJessop Posts: 46,251
    You have to love the front-page headline in the print version of Cambridge Evening News, which describes Fiona Onasanya as 'Ex-councillor' ...

    The fact she's a current Cambridgeshire MP is seemingly irrelevant.
  • The differences between Major, Brown and Blair, and maybe Cameron too, are all margin of error stuff. Are we making too much of this?

    It would be of far more interest if the list of candidates had been compiled by someone with an imagination. I for one would be fascinated to know whom the public would choose when offered, for example, a selection of either Theresa May or...

    Danny Dyer
    Gary Lineker
    Princess Meghan
    Susie Dent off Countdown
    The winners of Love Island, to rule jointly for a year in the manner of Roman consuls
    A military coup, with Parliament to be bombed to rubble by the RAF

    No sense of fun these YouGov people.
This discussion has been closed.