Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s NEW PB/ Polling Matters podcast: What drives how we

24

Comments

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,126
    Cookie said:

    Just to play Devil's advocate: in the 1960s, rail was struggling to compete with bus on journeys of under 50 miles. Rail was inflexible, expensive, infrequent, dirty and not particularly fast. There was no reason obvious at the time to retain most stopping services. Few at the time anticipated how traffic congestion would grow and give railback an advantage. I regret the closures - many of the lines would now be viable, and many of those that wouldn't be be lovely to have for sentimental reasons - but I sympathise with the reasons for their closure.

    In much of rural Britain, bus is still better at getting you from A to B than the defunct rail lines ever were.
    +1

    (And I am a rail enthusiast).
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,517

    So is being a Moscow stooge worse than being a Brussels stooge?
    Moscow is (currently) a hostile foreign power. Brussels is us.

    And I speak as a Russophile who regrets the current schism.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Cookie said:

    I wasn't trying to be parochial about it! All I meant by being a bigger attractor was that it had more jobs. I make no other judgement on the rival claims of the two cities! (Though I did live in Nottingham for ten years.)
    I didn't take it as a parochial comment, just simple fact.

    It reminds me of this classic story.

    Episode 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/3412149.stm

    Episode 2

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/content/articles/2006/12/07/rename_nottingham_ema_feature.shtml
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,126

    It's quite a propaganda feat for Russia to have simultaneously seduced far-right stooges around the world while keeping their traditional cohort of far-left ones on board.

    I suppose the fact that most of them are incredibly ignorant about Russia helps.
    Given comments by some on here about the Syrian White Helmets, I found the following of interest;
    https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/05/12/0212244/russian-fake-news-ecosystem-targets-syrian-human-rights-workers
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,589
    murali_s said:

    I agree - as far as age is concerned where does the ever-shifting boundary lie? Will the under 40s carry their Labour affiliation forward as they age?
    I doubt it, pensioners have not voted Labour since 1997 just as 18 to 24s have not voted Tory since 1983
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,124

    So is being a Moscow stooge worse than being a Brussels stooge?
    Dunno. Is the EU murdering its critics, propping up a regime that uses chemical weopons in the Middle East, and responsible for widespread propaganda designed to destabilise its opponents?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623

    Nah. Derby's the true regional capital. ;)
    Loughborough is the obvious neutral capital located between the 3 rival cities. Plus it has 'The Sock'.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370

    I’ve never got the pro-Russian line.
    The Baltics actually want us there. It’s Russia they’re afraid of. What moral or lawful right does Russia have from preventing those countries from joining NATO?

    None.

    Less than none, given the record of Soviet imperialism.

    Sad to see Thornberry join the far left, Putin-stooges.

    In other news:

    https://twitter.com/billbrowder/status/996700056471396352?s=21
    The Russians would have a case, if the Baltic States were a threat. But, they are entirely harmless, and not remotely capable of harming Russia. They have penny packets of soldiers, and just want to be left alone.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,124
    On Russia, the Italian government-in-waiting is in favour of dropping sanctions against Russia.

    Russia has done an extraordinary job of suborning certain individuals and parties across the West. You have to hand it to them.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370

    If you think our railways are third world then you have led an incredibly sheltered life. Either that or Sri Lanka has some extraordinarily advanced railways compared to the rest of India.
    Third world is Rome to Sorrento. Venice to Rome, first class, on my honeymoon, was as good as anything in Germany. Continuing the journey to Sorrento was something else entirely.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    On Russia, the Italian government-in-waiting is in favour of dropping sanctions against Russia.

    Russia has done an extraordinary job of suborning certain individuals and parties across the West. You have to hand it to them.

    I can't reveal all due to commercial confidentiality, but the germans just love doing business with russians.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,794

    On Russia, the Italian government-in-waiting is in favour of dropping sanctions against Russia.

    Russia has done an extraordinary job of suborning certain individuals and parties across the West. You have to hand it to them.

    They've managed to do it because the discontent with the elites exists in the first place. In places like Italy the people are fed up of the cosy EUphile theocracy offered by the traditional parties. It gives the Russians an easy opening gambit, just as it did with Trump and, by the sounds of things, Brexit. The Russians haven't created anything, all they have done is take advantage of a situation that already exists to further their own aims.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604
    ydoethur said:

    Which would undoubtedly be the optimum solution, and only not feasible because nobody on either side is willing to accept it.
    I don't see Jews ever again accepting a situation where they are a minority in a country dependant on the kindness or tolerance of non-Jews, no matter what the constitution or laws say and no matter what guarantees they get from outsiders.

    Jews have learnt the hard way that when you are in a minority you are vulnerable, no matter how integrated you are, no matter what your contributions, no matter how good a citizen you are, no matter even if you fight for your country of birth. They are determined to have one place in the world where that does not obtain. And looking at recent history and, indeed, at what has been happening in places such as France in recent years, it is perfectly understandable. Even if it does mean that in their Jewish home they behave to other minorities in a way which is bloody awful and damaging to their own long term interests.

    But I think they prefer being disliked but alive to being victims (again) and dead or persecuted.

    A two-state solution - as envisaged 70 years ago - is the only way to go.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,124
    On / off topic: all these railway discussions almost make me want to visit the East Midlands - surely the *least* glamorous of the English regions.

    Robin Hood Line? Ivanhoe Line?
    Stirring stuff.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,417
    Pulpstar said:

    I can't reveal all due to commercial confidentiality, but the germans just love doing business with russians.
    Thai’s dont, I understand, value Russian tourists highly.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,417
    edited May 2018
    Fair points, Ms Cyclefree. You can’t blame them, especially after what happened in Middle Europe 1935-45

    However, one wonders about some of the ‘Jews”. The Ethiopans yes, the Iraqis yes, but some of the recent European migrants are, I understand ‘barely’ Jewish.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    On / off topic: all these railway discussions almost make me want to visit the East Midlands - surely the *least* glamorous of the English regions.

    Robin Hood Line? Ivanhoe Line?
    Stirring stuff.

    Ha! The Peak District is very pretty – and is mostly in the East Midlands.
  • Loughborough is the obvious neutral capital located between the 3 rival cities. Plus it has 'The Sock'.
    Loughborough is grim old place.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    Cyclefree said:


    I don't see Jews ever again accepting a situation where they are a minority in a country dependant on the kindness or tolerance of non-Jews, no matter what the constitution or laws say and no matter what guarantees they get from outsiders.

    Jews have learnt the hard way that when you are in a minority you are vulnerable, no matter how integrated you are, no matter what your contributions, no matter how good a citizen you are, no matter even if you fight for your country of birth. They are determined to have one place in the world where that does not obtain. And looking at recent history and, indeed, at what has been happening in places such as France in recent years, it is perfectly understandable. Even if it does mean that in their Jewish home they behave to other minorities in a way which is bloody awful and damaging to their own long term interests.

    But I think they prefer being disliked but alive to being victims (again) and dead or persecuted.

    A two-state solution - as envisaged 70 years ago - is the only way to go.

    Why should anyone else accept this? Countries should be for people that live in them.

  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    STEPHEN Lawrence’s close pal who was with him when he was murdered is being lined up to be the next Tory Mayor of London, The Sun can reveal.

    Speaking exclusively to The Sun, gang crime campaigner Duwayne Brooks branded Labour's Sadiq Khan “the worst Mayor ever” as he revealed he has joined Theresa May’s party.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6304807/stephen-lawrence-pal-joins-the-tories-and-is-tipped-as-future-mayor-of-london-after-furious-blast-at-sadiq-khan/
  • twistedfirestopper3twistedfirestopper3 Posts: 2,498
    edited May 2018

    On / off topic: all these railway discussions almost make me want to visit the East Midlands - surely the *least* glamorous of the English regions.

    Robin Hood Line? Ivanhoe Line?
    Stirring stuff.

    I'd not trade my part of The Rural Heart of England for any of the dumps that are our major cities.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,718
    Anazina said:

    Ha! The Peak District is very pretty – and is mostly in the East Midlands.
    The Peak District is, I think, our only National Park which is in more than one region. It is certainly the only one in four different regions.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    MTimT said:

    I love that line 'Sri Lanka ... compared to the rest of India'
    I guess it's all bongo-bongo land to some people...
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Cookie said:

    The Peak District is, I think, our only National Park which is in more than one region. It is certainly the only one in four different regions.
    Yorkshire Dales is in more than one region.

    But the four region fact is clever!
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,718
    edited May 2018
    Anazina said:

    Yorkshire Dales is in more than one region.

    But the four region fact is clever!
    Thanks! And good point about the Dales.

    I love this place. If I was to trot out facts like that in the real world, people would look at me strangely.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,589
    FF43 said:

    Why should anyone else accept this? Countries should be for people that live in them.

    Didn't quite work out that way though for Jews living in Nazi Germany or Nazi occupied Europe though did it.

    Hence the reason why they feel they need at least 1 country where they are a majority
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621



    Moscow is (currently) a hostile foreign power. Brussels is us.

    And I speak as a Russophile who regrets the current schism.
    Genuine question: what is it about Russia that you like?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    On / off topic: all these railway discussions almost make me want to visit the East Midlands - surely the *least* glamorous of the English regions.

    Robin Hood Line? Ivanhoe Line?
    Stirring stuff.

    Derbyshire encapsulates the heart of what England means in my opinion.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604
    FF43 said:

    Why should anyone else accept this? Countries should be for people that live in them.

    Why shouldn't they? It was after all the decision of the UN - which pretty much represents the rest of the world - and it provides a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians. Jews have lived in the land of Israel for much much longer than Arabs. I don't accept the assumption that the group which arrived last in a region has somehow a greater right to live there than those who were there beforehand and who continue to live there.

    While it was a convenient fiction for early Israeli leaders to describe Israel as "A land without a people for a people without a land" it is also a fiction to say that there were no Jews living in the land of Israel before the 20th century and that only the Palestinians have a claim to live there.

    While I would like there to be a homeland for the Palestinians I simply will not support any solution which entails the destruction of Israel and the expulsion (or worse) of Jews. It might be easier for peace to be achieved if some of those groups complaining about Israel's behaviour explicitly forswore these as ambitions.

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    I wouldn't normally quote the Sun but this is interesting:

    "Stephen Lawrence pal Duwayne Brooks joins the Tories and is tipped as future Mayor of London after furious blast at Sadiq Khan"

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6304807/stephen-lawrence-pal-joins-the-tories-and-is-tipped-as-future-mayor-of-london-after-furious-blast-at-sadiq-khan/
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    On / off topic: all these railway discussions almost make me want to visit the East Midlands - surely the *least* glamorous of the English regions.

    Robin Hood Line? Ivanhoe Line?
    Stirring stuff.

    The East Midlands has plenty of interesting places to visit, like Dovedale, Lincoln, Rutland, Suthwell, Buxton, etc.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    AndyJS said:

    I wouldn't normally quote the Sun but this is interesting:

    "Stephen Lawrence pal Duwayne Brooks joins the Tories and is tipped as future Mayor of London after furious blast at Sadiq Khan"

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6304807/stephen-lawrence-pal-joins-the-tories-and-is-tipped-as-future-mayor-of-london-after-furious-blast-at-sadiq-khan/

    What have the Tories got to lose?
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    HYUFD said:

    Didn't quite work out that way though for Jews living in Nazi Germany or Nazi occupied Europe though did it.

    Hence the reason why they feel they need at least 1 country where they are a majority
    No it didn't work out for Jews in Nazi Germany. And you know what? It is utterly irrelevant to Israel. Countries are for those that live in them and not for ghosts, however outrageous the history. Sorry.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421

    The Ivanhoe Line (Burton to Leicester)
    Ivanhoe

    Chapter 1

    In that pleasant district of merry England which is watered by the river Don, there extended in ancient times a large forest, covering the greater part of the beautiful hills and valleys which lie between Sheffield and the pleasant town of Doncaster. The remains of this extensive wood are still to be seen at the noble seats of Wentworth, of Wharncliffe Park, and around Rotherham. Here haunted of yore the fabulous Dragon of Wantley; here were fought many of the most desperate battles during the Civil Wars of the Roses; and here also flourished in ancient times those bands of gallant outlaws, whose deeds have been rendered so popular in English song.

    Such being our chief scene ...

    The Ivanhoe line runs Doncaster-Conisbrough-Rotherham-Sheffield.


  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    edited May 2018
    Cyclefree said:

    Why shouldn't they? It was after all the decision of the UN - which pretty much represents the rest of the world - and it provides a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians. Jews have lived in the land of Israel for much much longer than Arabs. I don't accept the assumption that the group which arrived last in a region has somehow a greater right to live there than those who were there beforehand and who continue to live there.

    While it was a convenient fiction for early Israeli leaders to describe Israel as "A land without a people for a people without a land" it is also a fiction to say that there were no Jews living in the land of Israel before the 20th century and that only the Palestinians have a claim to live there.

    While I would like there to be a homeland for the Palestinians I simply will not support any solution which entails the destruction of Israel and the expulsion (or worse) of Jews. It might be easier for peace to be achieved if some of those groups complaining about Israel's behaviour explicitly forswore these as ambitions.

    While I understand the attraction of Jerusalem and the Holy Land as the most romantically/historically/religiously perfect place for a Jewish state, I do wonder what the world would look like if Israel has been set up in, say, Namibia, or Western Australia, or Texas.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,417
    edited May 2018
    Cyclefree said:

    Why shouldn't they? It was after all the decision of the UN - which pretty much represents the rest of the world - and it provides a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians. Jews have lived in the land of Israel for much much longer than Arabs. I don't accept the assumption that the group which arrived last in a region has somehow a greater right to live there than those who were there beforehand and who continue to live there.

    While it was a convenient fiction for early Israeli leaders to describe Israel as "A land without a people for a people without a land" it is also a fiction to say that there were no Jews living in the land of Israel before the 20th century and that only the Palestinians have a claim to live there.

    While I would like there to be a homeland for the Palestinians I simply will not support any solution which entails the destruction of Israel and the expulsion (or worse) of Jews. It might be easier for peace to be achieved if some of those groups complaining about Israel's behaviour explicitly forswore these as ambitions.

    It’s not easy though is it. Yes, the Jews were expelled by the Romans but were they all? How many ‘Arabs’ are the descendants of Jews who for whatever reason managed to stay?
    The Jews are also defined by their religion, but people change their religion for a variety of reasons, including because it’s the religion of the conquerers. Paris was after all, well worth a Mass, and early Islam wasn’t too dissimilar from Judaism.
    And anyway, the Arabs, Christian or Moslem have lived in Palestine for at least 1000 years; does that not give them some rights?

    It’s a complex mess and taking rigid political positions doesn’t help.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421
    Pulpstar said:

    Derbyshire encapsulates the heart of what England means in my opinion.
    But haven't you moved to Nottinghamshire ?
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    FF43 said:

    No it didn't work out for Jews in Nazi Germany. And you know what? It is utterly irrelevant to Israel. Countries are for those that live in them and not for ghosts, however outrageous the history. Sorry.
    If that were any kind of point at all, it would have been a point in 1948 or thereabouts. The people who live in Israel today are on the whole Jews, and Jews are therefore who it is now for. We have to start from where we currently are.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,392

    STEPHEN Lawrence’s close pal who was with him when he was murdered is being lined up to be the next Tory Mayor of London, The Sun can reveal.

    Speaking exclusively to The Sun, gang crime campaigner Duwayne Brooks branded Labour's Sadiq Khan “the worst Mayor ever” as he revealed he has joined Theresa May’s party.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6304807/stephen-lawrence-pal-joins-the-tories-and-is-tipped-as-future-mayor-of-london-after-furious-blast-at-sadiq-khan/

    Brooks was once an LD Councillor and ran as an independent as recently as two weeks ago so he's the newest of converts. It hardly seems likely the Conservatives will see him as the standard bearer (or should that be human sacrifice) to stand against Khan in 2020.

    As for his attack on Khan over the "Gang Matrix", I don't really understand. The Matrix was apparently set up in 2012 when Boris was Mayor - did he know ? Apparently it's all Sadiq's fault because he is the current Mayor. That seems flimsy reasoning - there's a question to be asked about the role of the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and whether either the current incumbent, Sophie Linden, or her predecessor, Stephen Greenhalgh, were involved with or knew about the Matrix and its function.

    There has been plenty of criticism of the Gangs Matrix within London but the Met have stood by its use.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    Cyclefree said:

    Why shouldn't they? It was after all the decision of the UN - which pretty much represents the rest of the world - and it provides a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians. Jews have lived in the land of Israel for much much longer than Arabs. I don't accept the assumption that the group which arrived last in a region has somehow a greater right to live there than those who were there beforehand and who continue to live there.

    While it was a convenient fiction for early Israeli leaders to describe Israel as "A land without a people for a people without a land" it is also a fiction to say that there were no Jews living in the land of Israel before the 20th century and that only the Palestinians have a claim to live there.

    While I would like there to be a homeland for the Palestinians I simply will not support any solution which entails the destruction of Israel and the expulsion (or worse) of Jews. It might be easier for peace to be achieved if some of those groups complaining about Israel's behaviour explicitly forswore these as ambitions.

    A liberal secular state doesn't include the expulsion of Jews.Indeed it protects the right of Jews and others to exercise their beliefs in a non-discriminatory way. Nor does it result in the destruction of Israel, except to the extent it removes discrimination. There some substantial straw man arguments in there.

    It's also highly questionable to say Jews have lived longer in Israel/Palestine than Arabs. It has been an Arab majority state for most of the past two thousand years. (Not that any of this is a justification for any form of governance now).
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Cookie said:

    Thanks! And good point about the Dales.

    I love this place. If I was to trot out facts like that in the real world, people would look at me strangely.
    :)
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370
    FF43 said:

    Why should anyone else accept this? Countries should be for people that live in them.

    I don't know about you, but if there had been a systematic attempt in recent times to exterminate my own ethnic group, I'd want to make damn sure that a State existed where my ethnic group formed a clear majority.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,718
    Pulpstar said:

    Derbyshire encapsulates the heart of what England means in my opinion.
    Economically dominated by a big city in a distant corner....


    But yes, I agree. It's a smahing place.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    But haven't you moved to Nottinghamshire ?
    Yep, but I've only been here a couple of months and don't really know it too well aside from my small part of Bassetlaw :)
    The last place I visited for recreation was Hardwick Hall in err Derbyshire.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,334
    stodge said:

    Brooks was once an LD Councillor and ran as an independent as recently as two weeks ago so he's the newest of converts. It hardly seems likely the Conservatives will see him as the standard bearer (or should that be human sacrifice) to stand against Khan in 2020.
    I should think that will depend on if he is still with them come 2020 - I don't get the impression parties are sentimental about loyalty when it might conceivably be the difference between losing and winning (whether that is at all possible for the Tories in the current situation is a separate question). That he used to be a LD might be seen as a positive if they think he might open them up to the more liberally minded as well as their base. I have no idea if that is likely, or if it would be enough, but if he looks like he has a shot, that in itself would be enough for him to be the standard bearer, I should think.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,517
    Anorak said:

    Genuine question: what is it about Russia that you like?
    Language, culture, history, people. Moscow is one of the most inspiring cities in the world and the country itself is a vast melting pot.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,124
    edited May 2018
    Pulpstar said:

    Yep, but I've only been here a couple of months and don't really know it too well aside from my small part of Bassetlaw :)
    The last place I visited for recreation was Hardwick Hall in err Derbyshire.
    In a former life, Derbyshire County Council was a client, and I travelled regularly to Matlock, which was lovely.

    I remember asking one Director if she was from Derbyshire. She looked at me with horror.

    “Good God, no! I’m from Nottinghamshire.”
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,407
    stodge said:

    Brooks was once an LD Councillor and ran as an independent as recently as two weeks ago so he's the newest of converts. It hardly seems likely the Conservatives will see him as the standard bearer (or should that be human sacrifice) to stand against Khan in 2020.

    As for his attack on Khan over the "Gang Matrix", I don't really understand. The Matrix was apparently set up in 2012 when Boris was Mayor - did he know ? Apparently it's all Sadiq's fault because he is the current Mayor. That seems flimsy reasoning - there's a question to be asked about the role of the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and whether either the current incumbent, Sophie Linden, or her predecessor, Stephen Greenhalgh, were involved with or knew about the Matrix and its function.

    There has been plenty of criticism of the Gangs Matrix within London but the Met have stood by its use.
    Saying someone is the worst Mayor ever seems far from wise too. I'd find it pretty hard even to describe SK as a bad Mayor, although I'm all over 'indifferent'.

    London is far too important to have novice politicians running for the Mayoralty. (I know some will suggest Boris was and is a politician still with his stabiliser wheels, but it's not really fair)

    The right candidate could win for the Tories even given their poor ratings in London overall. Zac Goldsmith was the wrong candidate, so it should be easy to find someone a little better, but finding the person that can win is a challenge - I'm pretty sure they're out there though.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421
    Revealing facts about auditors:

    ' Concentration in this market has now reached absurd levels – the big four are auditors to 97% of FTSE 350 companies. Carillion perfectly illustrated the closed shop in action. KMPG approved the accounts, Deloitte advised the board on risk management, and EY was consulted on turnaround plans. That left the field clear for PwC to name its price as adviser to the Official Receiver. '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2018/may/16/entire-system-failed-carillion-not-just-directors-at-the-top

    The breaking up of the big audit firms is long overdue
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604

    It’s not easy though is it. Yes, the Jews were expelled by the Romans but were they all? How many ‘Arabs’ are the descendants of Jews who for whatever reason managed to stay?
    The Jews are also defined by their religion, but people change their religion for a variety of reasons, including because it’s the religion of the conquerers. Paris was after all, well worth a Mass, and early Islam wasn’t too dissimilar from Judaism.
    And anyway, the Arabs, Christian or Moslem have lived in Palestine for at least 1000 years; does that not give them some rights?

    It’s a complex mess and taking rigid political positions doesn’t help.

    Indeed, Arabs do have some rights and that is why I would very much like there to be a Palestinian state alongside Israel. This was on offer in 1948 and also when Clinton pushed his peace plan. It has been a tragedy that Palestinian leadership has been so poor that in seeking everything during the last 70 years and befoehanded it has ended up with nothing. It is now facing an Israeli leadership which does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process. In that sense, Israeli leaders have become more Middle Eastern - focusing more on "might is right" than is wise.

    As you say, a complex mess.

    But if insisting on the survival - rather than the destruction - of Israel is deemed to be taking a rigid political position, then I am happy to plead guilty. Some things are non-negotiable and in my book the survival of Israel is one of them.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370

    In a former life, Derbyshire County Council was a client, and I travelled regularly to Matlock, which was lovely.

    I remember asking one Director if she was from Derbyshire. She looked at me with horror.

    “Good God, no! I’m from Nottinghamshire.”
    The Peak District is stunning.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,718

    Language, culture, history, people. Moscow is one of the most inspiring cities in the world and the country itself is a vast melting pot.
    Martin Sixsmith wrote a very entertaining book about Russian History. I can't remember the title, but it ought to have been '1,000 years of unrelenting bloody misery'. The lot of a Russian appears never to have been a happy one.
  • Torby_FennelTorby_Fennel Posts: 438
    AndyJS said:



    The East Midlands has plenty of interesting places to visit, like Dovedale, Lincoln, Rutland, Suthwell, Buxton, etc.

    Indeed so. I've lived in the East Midlands for the vast majority of my life and love the area. I grew up in Nottinghamshire and have spent most of my adult life in Lincolnshire (and much of that in Lincoln itself). Only my university years (in North Wales) interrupted my time in the region. :)

  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    To repeat what I said on the last thread. Based on their actions at the moment they deserve to be pretty fucking insulted. And that is a very weird attitude. Its okay to shoot people but not to insult them?
    Who said anything about it being okay to shoot people? The Israelis may be defending what happened; I'm certainly not. I'm asking why bring the Nazis into it. You've got to be a proper Ken to think that's okay.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604
    FF43 said:

    A liberal secular state doesn't include the expulsion of Jews.Indeed it protects the right of Jews and others to exercise their beliefs in a non-discriminatory way. Nor does it result in the destruction of Israel, except to the extent it removes discrimination. There some substantial straw man arguments in there.

    It's also highly questionable to say Jews have lived longer in Israel/Palestine than Arabs. It has been an Arab majority state for most of the past two thousand years. (Not that any of this is a justification for any form of governance now).
    A liberal secular state. Like France for instance. Where despite it being both liberal and secular the rights of Jews have not, in practice, been protected. They cannot, for instance, go round in public wearing the kippah because of the risk of being attacked for being Jewish. They have to have armed guards protecting schools and places of worship.

    And if that is the position in France (and see what is also happening in Germany) it is simply naive to think that a liberal secular state populated by Jews and Arabs could be created and survive in the Middle East, at least in the world as it is now.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    edited May 2018

    Language, culture, history, people. Moscow is one of the most inspiring cities in the world and the country itself is a vast melting pot.
    It's a shame it's being run by villains and despots.

    And having been to Moscow a few times, I'd struggle to call it inspiring :)

    St Petersburg, though...
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370
    Cyclefree said:


    Indeed, Arabs do have some rights and that is why I would very much like there to be a Palestinian state alongside Israel. This was on offer in 1948 and also when Clinton pushed his peace plan. It has been a tragedy that Palestinian leadership has been so poor that in seeking everything during the last 70 years and befoehanded it has ended up with nothing. It is now facing an Israeli leadership which does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process. In that sense, Israeli leaders have become more Middle Eastern - focusing more on "might is right" than is wise.

    As you say, a complex mess.

    But if insisting on the survival - rather than the destruction - of Israel is deemed to be taking a rigid political position, then I am happy to plead guilty. Some things are non-negotiable and in my book the survival of Israel is one of them.
    The end of Israel would not mean the creation of a secular democracy. It would mean the end of its Jewish population.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421
    Sean_F said:

    The Peak District is stunning.
    The sudden change between suburban Sheffield and the Peak District is very striking.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,417
    edited May 2018
    Cyclefree said:


    Indeed, Arabs do have some rights and that is why I would very much like there to be a Palestinian state alongside Israel. This was on offer in 1948 and also when Clinton pushed his peace plan. It has been a tragedy that Palestinian leadership has been so poor that in seeking everything during the last 70 years and befoehanded it has ended up with nothing. It is now facing an Israeli leadership which does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process. In that sense, Israeli leaders have become more Middle Eastern - focusing more on "might is right" than is wise.

    As you say, a complex mess.

    But if insisting on the survival - rather than the destruction - of Israel is deemed to be taking a rigid political position, then I am happy to plead guilty. Some things are non-negotiable and in my book the survival of Israel is one of them.
    No problem with the survival of some form of Jewish state; not necessarily Israel as presently understood.
    However, did you mean what you wrote when you wrote: 'It i(presumably the 'Arab state’) is now facing an Israeli leadership which does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process.’

    I really don’t get the impression that the Israeli leadership "does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process.” I would have said ‘doesn’t. Not does,
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,124

    Revealing facts about auditors:

    ' Concentration in this market has now reached absurd levels – the big four are auditors to 97% of FTSE 350 companies. Carillion perfectly illustrated the closed shop in action. KMPG approved the accounts, Deloitte advised the board on risk management, and EY was consulted on turnaround plans. That left the field clear for PwC to name its price as adviser to the Official Receiver. '

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2018/may/16/entire-system-failed-carillion-not-just-directors-at-the-top

    The breaking up of the big audit firms is long overdue

    There are way too many cosy cartels in this country. It’s one of the key reasons that we suffer from low productivity, in my opinion.
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    *snippety snip*


    However, did you mean what you wrote when you wrote: 'It i(presumably the 'Arab state’) is now facing an Israeli leadership which does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process.’

    I really don’t get the impression that the Israeli leadership "does have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process.” I would have said ‘doesn’t. Not does,

    I read that as a typo!
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183
    Cyclefree said:

    A liberal secular state. Like France for instance. Where despite it being both liberal and secular the rights of Jews have not, in practice, been protected. They cannot, for instance, go round in public wearing the kippah because of the risk of being attacked for being Jewish. They have to have armed guards protecting schools and places of worship.

    And if that is the position in France (and see what is also happening in Germany) it is simply naive to think that a liberal secular state populated by Jews and Arabs could be created and survive in the Middle East, at least in the world as it is now.
    +1
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,111

    There are way too many cosy cartels in this country. It’s one of the key reasons that we suffer from low productivity, in my opinion.
    Not least in politics, of course. Prior to 2010 the last time we had a de jure two party government was 1964, the last time in practice we had a multiparty government was 1945, the last time a party other than Labour or the Conservatives/Unionists won over 100 seats was in 1923, the last time we had a government led by a party other than Labour or the Conservatives/Unionists was 1915 and the last time a party other than those two won an actual majority was 1906.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    Senate votes to save net neutrality rules

    The Senate on Wednesday voted to reinstate the FCC's net neutrality rules, passing a bill that has little chance of advancing in the House but offers net neutrality supporters and Democrats a political rallying point for the midterm elections.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,417
    Anorak said:

    *snippety snip*

    I read that as a typo!
    I hoped it was, but wanted to be sure!
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    The sudden change between suburban Sheffield and the Peak District is very striking.
    Here's why the Lib Dems are coming back in West Sheffield in one picture: https://tinyurl.com/y7ledoyj . I'm afraid alot of east Sheffield is still red rosette on an AMEY donkey van though.
    To be honest the results were about as good as can be hoped for overall, only 40.1% of voters ticked the Labour box which is a minor miracle round those parts.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    stodge said:

    Brooks was once an LD Councillor and ran as an independent as recently as two weeks ago so he's the newest of converts. It hardly seems likely the Conservatives will see him as the standard bearer (or should that be human sacrifice) to stand against Khan in 2020.

    As for his attack on Khan over the "Gang Matrix", I don't really understand. The Matrix was apparently set up in 2012 when Boris was Mayor - did he know ? Apparently it's all Sadiq's fault because he is the current Mayor. That seems flimsy reasoning - there's a question to be asked about the role of the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and whether either the current incumbent, Sophie Linden, or her predecessor, Stephen Greenhalgh, were involved with or knew about the Matrix and its function.

    There has been plenty of criticism of the Gangs Matrix within London but the Met have stood by its use.
    Agreed. This seems like the Sol Campbell debacle all over again, IMO.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Active terrorists who were shooting or planting bombs when shot, or members of a terrorist organisation. It's not quite the same thing. Shades of recent Nobel peace prize winners defining terrorists as anyone killed by a drone.
    I’m sure some of each. But Israel has a more robust approach than we do.

    But I think your comparison is unfair. Hamas has acknowledged Israel’s estimate to be correct
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238
    Anazina said:

    Leicester will always be an also-ran to Nottingham in the region. Nottingham is the regional capital and will forever be so.
    Whilst I agree that is the case now, it certainly wasn't in the past. Leicester was the civitas capital in Iron Age and Roman times. That all changed when Danelaw came along and Nottingham took its place as one of the 5 towns of Danelaw.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    There are way too many cosy cartels in this country. It’s one of the key reasons that we suffer from low productivity, in my opinion.
    Hmm I'm not a massive fan of the big four and not bitter at all that PWC rejected my application about 15 years ago but I think people misunderstand the role of auditors... this sort of comment
    'Given the relative size of the goodwill in the Group balance sheet, particularly in the UK Services CGU, relatively small changes in these assumptions could give rise to material changes in the assessment of the carrying value of goodwill.' is a bit of a danger warning flag to anyone who cares to read the annual statement.
    KPMG had a good few such statements in Carrillion's audit report.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    FF43 said:

    Strangely, Israel's friends and foes have a shared interest in making the country to be exceptional. In my view it is a deeply mediocre country. Not uniquely awful, but awful enough for a large part of its inhabitants. If there is ever to be a "solution" in my view it is as a single state that stretches from the Mediterranean to the Jordan, that is neither Jewish nor Palestinian but which institutionalises the fact of there being about half of each,
    Wasn’t that the proposal made by Richard the Lionheart?

    (Yes, seriously! Albeit Christians/Muslims/Jews)
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    Whilst I agree that is the case now, it certainly wasn't in the past. Leicester was the civitas capital in Iron Age and Roman times. That all changed when Danelaw came along and Nottingham took its place as one of the 5 towns of Danelaw.
    Interesting - thanks
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238
    Anazina said:

    I didn't take it as a parochial comment, just simple fact.

    It reminds me of this classic story.

    Episode 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/3412149.stm

    Episode 2

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/content/articles/2006/12/07/rename_nottingham_ema_feature.shtml
    The one that causes the most confusion is Robin Hood Airport at Doncaster. No end of people travel there thinking it is near Nottingham because of the Robin Hood name.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,407
    Pulpstar said:

    Hmm I'm not a massive fan of the big four and not bitter at all that PWC rejected my application about 15 years ago but I think people misunderstand the role of auditors... this sort of comment
    'Given the relative size of the goodwill in the Group balance sheet, particularly in the UK Services CGU, relatively small changes in these assumptions could give rise to material changes in the assessment of the carrying value of goodwill.' is a bit of a danger warning flag to anyone who cares to read the annual statement.
    KPMG had a good few such statements in Carrillion's audit report.
    No doubt a bit buried in the statement. When they state something unusual it should be highlighted and flagged as unusual for the non-specialist.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604
    edited May 2018

    I hoped it was, but wanted to be sure!
    It was indeed a typo!

    Sadly, the Israeli leadership does not have the ambition or compassion or farsightedness or generosity necessary to kickstart a fresh peace process.

    Until it does it is hard to see a way out of the current bloody impasse.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 50,825

    Whilst I agree that is the case now, it certainly wasn't in the past. Leicester was the civitas capital in Iron Age and Roman times. That all changed when Danelaw came along and Nottingham took its place as one of the 5 towns of Danelaw.
    Now I am just being trolled :)

    Nottingham has been on the decline for a couple of decades, and Leicester ascendant. In particular Leicester has become the detination for shopping in the region, and of course our Football team is far better too.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Richard(s) and Pulpstar

    Nottingham is a superior city in an ordinary county.

    Derby is an ordinary city in a superior county.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238
    Cyclefree said:

    Why shouldn't they? It was after all the decision of the UN - which pretty much represents the rest of the world - and it provides a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians. Jews have lived in the land of Israel for much much longer than Arabs. I don't accept the assumption that the group which arrived last in a region has somehow a greater right to live there than those who were there beforehand and who continue to live there.

    While it was a convenient fiction for early Israeli leaders to describe Israel as "A land without a people for a people without a land" it is also a fiction to say that there were no Jews living in the land of Israel before the 20th century and that only the Palestinians have a claim to live there.

    While I would like there to be a homeland for the Palestinians I simply will not support any solution which entails the destruction of Israel and the expulsion (or worse) of Jews. It might be easier for peace to be achieved if some of those groups complaining about Israel's behaviour explicitly forswore these as ambitions.

    Strawman argument. No one on here has said anything about destroying Israel. But Israel neds to be back in its 1967 borders as agreed by the UN. The fact they were persecuted in the past does not give them the right to persecute others now.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    The one that causes the most confusion is Robin Hood Airport at Doncaster. No end of people travel there thinking it is near Nottingham because of the Robin Hood name.
    I can imagine. Whether or not Hood existed and whether or not, if he did, he was in fact from South Yorkshire, he is inextricably linked both domestically and internationally with Nottingham and that simply isn’t going to change. Doncaster might try to find its own hero.

    I guess they came close with Ed Miliband!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,334
    Foxy said:

    Now I am just being trolled :)

    Nottingham has been on the decline for a couple of decades, and Leicester ascendant. In particular Leicester has become the detination for shopping in the region, and of course our Football team is far better too.
    It also has produced some marvelous graduates, including yours truly.

    I don't feel I really took advantage of the city as much as I could have though.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,604

    Strawman argument. No one on here has said anything about destroying Israel. But Israel neds to be back in its 1967 borders as agreed by the UN. The fact they were persecuted in the past does not give them the right to persecute others now.
    It does not matter what we say on here. It does matter what Hamas and the Palestinian authority say. Hamas does want the destruction of Israel. The expressed view of the PLA depends on which audience they are speaking to.

    Until those on the ground agree that Israel can exist - whether within the 1967 borders or some other agreed borders - there can be no peace. Currently Israel's enemies - some of them - want the country to disappear.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238

    Indeed so. I've lived in the East Midlands for the vast majority of my life and love the area. I grew up in Nottinghamshire and have spent most of my adult life in Lincolnshire (and much of that in Lincoln itself). Only my university years (in North Wales) interrupted my time in the region. :)

    Funny coincidence. I grew up in Nottinghamshire living there for 40 years. I have now moved over the birder into Lincolnshire for the last 9 years and my university years were in South Wales rather than North :)
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421

    The one that causes the most confusion is Robin Hood Airport at Doncaster. No end of people travel there thinking it is near Nottingham because of the Robin Hood name.
    Its not particularly near Sheffield either.

    It was the Sherrif who was in Nottingham not Robin Hood.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doncaster_Sheffield_Airport#Name

    Though the airport should have been named Pilgrim Fathers as many of them came from villages surrounding the airport and it is a travel associated name.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238
    Foxy said:

    Now I am just being trolled :)

    Nottingham has been on the decline for a couple of decades, and Leicester ascendant. In particular Leicester has become the detination for shopping in the region, and of course our Football team is far better too.
    But Nottingham does have two league football teams rather than just one :) And of course the Leading Ice Hockey team in the UK.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238

    Who said anything about it being okay to shoot people? The Israelis may be defending what happened; I'm certainly not. I'm asking why bring the Nazis into it. You've got to be a proper Ken to think that's okay.
    Except at no point did I bring Nazis into it. I think your argument must have been with someone else.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421
    Anazina said:

    I can imagine. Whether or not Hood existed and whether or not, if he did, he was in fact from South Yorkshire, he is inextricably linked both domestically and internationally with Nottingham and that simply isn’t going to change. Doncaster might try to find its own hero.

    I guess they came close with Ed Miliband!
    The Doncaster fictional hero is Ivanhoe - who it seems Leicestershire is trying to claim.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Foxy said:

  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,407

    Strawman argument. No one on here has said anything about destroying Israel. But Israel neds to be back in its 1967 borders as agreed by the UN. The fact they were persecuted in the past does not give them the right to persecute others now.
    Tricky to have aggression by the Arab League etc allowed to result in just being able to rewind and try again though. What did Israel claim prior to hostilities? Certainly Jerusalem I'd imagine.

    There must be a price for aggressive war if you lose. The price paid for losing their defensive war, had Israel lost, would undoubtedly have been absolutely awful.

    (Apologies for any misremembered detail here, but I think the general theme stands)
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487
    Foxy

    Nottingham miles ahead in retail.

    http://hdh.co.uk/uploads/2017/06/HDH-Vitality-Index-June-2017.pdf

    Nottingham is a two-club city so really Leicester City ought to do better. Historically though Forest are the biggest club in the region and have won two European cups.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421

    There are way too many cosy cartels in this country. It’s one of the key reasons that we suffer from low productivity, in my opinion.
    Agreed.

    Unfortunately governments seem to have a liking for cosy cartels.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    Ishmael_Z said:

    If that were any kind of point at all, it would have been a point in 1948 or thereabouts. The people who live in Israel today are on the whole Jews, and Jews are therefore who it is now for. We have to start from where we currently are.
    The people living in Israel today are not "on the whole Jews". Including the bantustans they are about half Jewish. Even if they were majority Jewish it still doesn't excuse discrimination. Countries are rightly judged by how they treat minorities. To be fair to Israel, it doesn't have a monopoly on discrimination in that part of the world.
  • oldpoliticsoldpolitics Posts: 455
    Charles said:

    Wasn’t that the proposal made by Richard the Lionheart?

    (Yes, seriously! Albeit Christians/Muslims/Jews)
    Lebanon. You've invented Lebanon.

    Also, if your solution to middle east peace is "Israel should be more like Lebanon" then you're off your nut.
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    Except at no point did I bring Nazis into it. I think your argument must have been with someone else.
    You replied to a comment about exactly that! And then said it's good they get get insulted when I asked specifically about bringing comparisons to Nazis into it.

    Why did you reply to the comment that said comparing Israel to Nazis is antisemitic by disagreeing with it? How Ken are you?
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,421
    Anazina said:

    Foxy

    Nottingham miles ahead in retail.

    http://hdh.co.uk/uploads/2017/06/HDH-Vitality-Index-June-2017.pdf

    Nottingham is a two-club city so really Leicester City ought to do better. Historically though Forest are the biggest club in the region and have won two European cups.

    Technically Nottingham is a one club city as Forest play in Rushcliffe.

    Which is itself an oddity with the 'city' club playing in the county and the 'county' club playing in the city.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    Technically Nottingham is a one club city as Forest play in Rushcliffe.

    Which is itself an oddity with the 'city' club playing in the county and the 'county' club playing in the city.
    Ha! Very true!
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,504

    Technically Nottingham is a one club city as Forest play in Rushcliffe.

    Which is itself an oddity with the 'city' club playing in the county and the 'county' club playing in the city.
    I never knew that. Same applies to Manchester as United play in Trafford.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    The Doncaster fictional hero is Ivanhoe - who it seems Leicestershire is trying to claim.
    I thought they were going for Richard III
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,410
    tlg86 said:

    I never knew that. Same applies to Manchester as United play in Trafford.
    Change at Stratford for West Ham :)
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,410
    Anazina said:

    Richard(s) and Pulpstar

    Nottingham is a superior city in an ordinary county.

    Derby is an ordinary city in a superior county.

    Think they are building two extra platforms at Derby station, when I passed through last week.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,238


    You replied to a comment about exactly that! And then said it's good they get get insulted when I asked specifically about bringing comparisons to Nazis into it.

    Why did you reply to the comment that said comparing Israel to Nazis is antisemitic by disagreeing with it? How Ken are you?

    Now you are just getting desperate. I replied to an ongoing conversation thread about anti-Semitism with the following comment:

    "No matter how much their supporters try to make it so, Israel and Judaism are not synonymous. Indeed plenty of Orthodox Jews claim the existence of Israel is against Jewish teachings.

    To claim that criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic is merely a way to shut down debate."

    At no point did I mention Nazis nor did my comment make an reference or inference about them. It was a general comment and if the only way you can counter it is by straw man arguments then clearly you lack the ability to argue your case cogently or reasonably.
This discussion has been closed.