Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Blow for Farage after he loses libel case against anti race ha

Ex-UKIP leader and QuestionTime regular, Nigel Farage just lost £100k libel legal battle after calling anti racist group 'violent' https://t.co/2m5HopfWMb
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
They aren't the same thing
That should please those who voted to Leave because they felt left behind and abandoned by the global elite.
Remainers have had an effect. Some want to blame them for that, either for being effective or not effective enough, others will suggest any effect was negligible on the overall matters of substance. But it would be wrong to dismiss the possibility of any impact, positive or negative, on the basis that they are not in government. This right here is why I cannot take you seriously.
A bit like Theresa May being the wost Tory leader of my lifetime.
Someone's got to pay for their tax credits.
Just as somebody has to be a member of the Conservative party...
Have a good evening.
Are you sure BGNW re Conservative Call Centre and Police. I know the ICO stopped at a slap on the wrist, but I can't find anything re the police stopping their investigation and it was only a few weeks ago where they confirmed they were investigating. A quick scan of the Internet doesn't come up with anything. It wouldn't surprise me, but I can't believe I missed it and I would expect it to drag on for ages.
But Scott, I do appreciate your lack of viciousness all the same!
This is different, if you look at his evolution of Dortmund, this is how he did it there.
I think here in Wales Carwyn Jones and toxic Welsh labour is the story playing out nightly on the Wales ITV
Did Remainers
- get appointed to any key Brexit posts?
- stop Article 50?
- change the timing?
- write May's speeches (any of them)?
- change the negotiating briefs or outcomes?
The Brexit that is being pursued is being driven by Bexiteers, or May's existential fear of the Brexiteers.
Consider the alternative. May could have embraced Remainers in cabinet. She could have said "I speak for all" instead of "I speak for the 52%". She could have pursued membership of EFTA, EEA, etc. Remianers did not force her hand on any of that.
This is a Brexit, by the Brexiteers, for the Brexiteers. And the rest of us are just collateral damage.
Most Leave voters will therefore be fine with that as they are still getting the controls on low-skilled workers they voted for.
There was graffiti in the area stating: "ANL (Anti Nazi League) Kill the Nazi Scum!
I guess the people making the posters didn't get the irony.
Some have given me snippets, but, too often, I've had to wade through pompous, and patronising, posts laced with thinly-veiled insults - to which I've found it difficult not to react to - and others have made it clear that I have the Mark of Cain upon me for voting for Leave in the first place last year.
So, I've largely given up.
EDit: Seen it. Godsdamnit.
I am curious how they decided who got top billing, ie larger photos, though.
To date there has been zero effect, therefore I dispute the cause...
The result, unfortunately, was Universal Credit. The implementation of which perhaps bears out the "good intentions, but not very competent" view of IDS.
Taking money away from people like that is just wrong.
And yet still you refuse to tell me who will win the Triumph Hurdle next year.
You get the same disease three or four times and they start acting like it is all your fault.
1 'To ensure that decisions taken about the UK should be taken in the UK.'
2 'Voting to Leave offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.'
3 'Remaining meant little or no choice about how the EU expanded its membership or powers.'
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/
Only 77, I still hope Bercow stands down at some point and Ken can be speaker, that would be fun. Not seeming likely though.
Typical Leave fuckwits.