politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If there was to be a new Brexit referendum then LAB voters wou

Lots of talk at the LAB conference today of a second Brexit referendum. This comes amidst new GQRR polling that suggests more support for the idea including 70% of LAB voters.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
FPT Corbyn was, of course, a 1970s anti-marketeer (as we called them in those days). But he has moved away from that position for tactical reasons and because he knows that the party membership, and his own supporters, are overwhelmingly opposed to a hard Brexit. The internal party campaign for free movement is run entirely by momentum supporters.
The combination of internal party pressure and the realities of trying to deliver Brexit will push him further over the next few months. Labour's positioning on the Brexit issue has been unexpectedly deft recently - it has effectively signed up to the EEA option, which is the only practicable alternative to the cliff edge. This is said, of course, to be "transitional" but once we are there I think the chances of "transitioning" any further are slim, if only because the EU27 would have no incentive to offer the UK acceptable exit deal.
I'd be changing my mind hourly.
Not sure what sort of 'reforms', Macron has in mind for the EU, but a rapid reaction force is more than a gendarmarie.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/26/emmanuel-macron-says-britain-will-have-place-inreformed-simplified/
So the Labour party's current policy, apoarently, of staying in the Single Market for a bit is purely tactical, to ensure that they keep voters appalled by Tory shenanigans on Brexit on board so thatbthey win the next election.
Once in power I expect them to ditch the EU so that they can carry out the economic policies they are really interested in and which EU rules would prevent. So a vote for Labour under Corbyn/McDonnell is a vote for a Hard Brexit. And one which will be particularly damaging if combined with the sorts of policies McDonnell has been talking about.
Of course, the Tories are unable to criticise this effectively because they too seem to be heading for Hard Brexit unless the grown ups (are there any?) change direction into something more realistic.
Hard times ahead for all, I fear......
This is the sort of thing however, embryonic and bare boned it is, that should've been done yonks ago and might've saved a load of grief. Let's see what becomes of it over the years if it gets anywhere at all, as Merkel has her own issues now trying to cobble together something strong and stable from CDU/CSU/FDP/Greens (quite an ask) and the Easterners will squeal loudly at any thought of two speeds even if they still want the power to not have Mutti's migrants reallocated to them.
TM resorts to desperate measures in BREXIT negotiations!!!
How do the non-voters break down?
If this trend(?) towards higher turnout continues, what previous non-voters think matters.
We have to consider the possibility that a brexit rerun could match indyref turnout levels, with the *new* voters deciding the outcome.
https://twitter.com/JakubKrupa/status/912687186222419968
If your question is should it be at the top table of European Union nations then the question should be:
"Should Britain remain in the EU, adopt the Euro and join the Schengen visa-free travel area"....
..we'll leave the EU army/navy/airforce for later.....
I think Labour moderates who think as you have outlined above are being naive. They are confusing Corbyn's tactics with his strategy. They are believing what they want to be true.
Everything Corbyn has said and done shows that he is not in favour of the EU. The only bits he likes can be done outside the EU. What he and McDonnell want to do economically to the UK is best done without the pesky EU interfering. He will take victory at an election as carte blanche to do what he wants to do, just as he has taken victory in the Labour leadership elections to carry on in his own sweet way.
Esprit d'escalier, alas.
It will prove much easier for Germany and France to leave the EU and join the UK's new European Economic Commonwealth.
Or the EEC, for short.
Since the EU Ref, there has been churn. Pro-Brexit voters have moved to Con, and anti-Brexit to Labour.
The headline figures have barely moved and, where they have, it's all MoE stuff.
That doesn't mean the leave vote isn't dying - it quite possibly is.
Yougov's polling panel are probably able to measure the effect better than random sample polls, imo.
For that at least, we should all be grateful.
Not by swiping all the papers off the table, leaning across to the UK, grabbing it by the tie and collar, and giving it an almighty slap.
Do you actually know any Tories?
A Single Market for all. An inner Eurozone core. An outer none Eurozone group. Rules affecting all states to be brought in only with majorities of both the inner and outer cores. Some sensible amendments on free movement. Far better control of the outer borders and strict rules properly enforced on immigration into the EU. No slicing away of UK common law or criminal law protections (ie reform of the EEA).
Something like that might be acceptable to a majority. Not saying it's on offer..... but if it were?
I am still not clear about what the question is for the second referendum. Is it
Accept the deal or leave without one?
Accept the deal or change the deal with a lower UK payment and or no transition?
Accept the deal or stay in the EU on the existing Terms?
Accept the deal or stay in but with the terms for new members eg The Euro and Schengen and no rebate - which the EU might insist on?
Stay in the single market and Customs union or leave both?
Stay in the single market but leave the CU or leave both?
Stay in the CU but leave the single market or leave neither?
Leave or remain whatever the terms - we did that before?
My head is starting to hurt...........
Whilst I fear Brexit will be a disaster for the UK, those two in charge of the UK will be even worse.
It shows Labour 31 seats short of an overall majority with the SNP on 41 including Salmond's seat in Gordon. An early election might well be in the SNP's interests!
The fact that you cannot see it, does not mean that it does not exist.
“I feel cautiously optimistic about the constructive and more realistic tone of the prime minister’s speech in Florence and our discussion today ... This shows that the philosophy of having cake and eating it is finally coming to an end. At least I hope so.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/sep/26/donald-tusk-uk-cake-and-eat-it-approach-brexit?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Those who just want us to remain without consulting the electorate are damned silly.
As, indeed, might many Labour voters who hate Corbyn/McDonnell's vision of the New Venezuela...
The graph above indicates that precisely nothing has changed, it does lack one detail though. How would non GE (But EU referendum) voters vote ?
The EU ref had a larger pool than the GE, so the breakdown of those voters is vital to a theoretical second question.
This is spot on. The Left was largely united in 2017 against May and the Tories. Will this be true come the next election? To some extent almost certainly yes. Enough to put Corbyn into No 10? Possibly more doubtful....
1. We had a referendum, which I supported. Of course I respect the result, so I think we should now leave the EU.
2. That doesn't mean that I have changed my view on the merits of leaving. It's still a big risk, and the benefits of leaving strike me as not worth the risk. The only thing which has perhaps changed is that the risk of leaving looks even bigger now, because Brexit+Corbyn together is a seriously nasty prospect by any measure.
3. In any case, even if I did decide that we should try to stop Brexit, there is no party offering that in any coherent form. The LibDems seem to be proposing a bizarre second referendum where the choices would be accepting whatever deal is on offer, or crashing out with no deal at all. I applaud their pro-EU integrity in one sense (or at least I would if they had voted against holding the referendum), but the practicalities are bonkers.
4. Well, I'm not going to vote Corbyn/McDonnell/Milne/Lansman under any circumstances whatsoever, am I, but in any case Labour aren't offering anything different to the Conservatives on this, so Brexit is totally irrelevant to anyone who might be tempted to switch from the Tories to Labour.
As always, I try to deal with the world as it is. Yes, of course, if there were a scenario where I could vote for a Cameron/Osborne government, remaining in the EU with Dave's rather good if maligned deal, then I would do. That's not on offer, Brexit is going to happen, it's time to draw a line under the referendum and get on with crafting a post-Brexit Britain which is economically sensible and which reflects the values I would support.
What a bunch of wankers.
Or... the people of the UK could plan for no run on the pound - by not voting for Corbyn/McDonnell controlling the levers of power.
Am I alone in thinking this is really dumb politics?
You'd think there'd be sensible people within the EU who understood this and were thinking along similar lines.
But, there don't appear to be.
Your social and work circles are both restricted and limited.
You know this. Accept it and admit it.
It's a complete disregard for the truth that one has come to associate with Leavers.
A Remain Conservative (who happens to me one of my best friends, and has just got engaged) was visiting my wife and me last weekend with his fiancé, and I was talking to another at WhatsApp at lunch who works for JP Morgan.
In this case, it's your own ignorance, prejudice and confirmation bias on display.
You're in classic Meekstwattery mode today. So I'll ignore you until you've come to your senses again.
Generally, eventually, you do.
If you had, you would not have made the statement you did.
No doubt there are those that passionately support the EU, but I'd put this at between 15-20% of the population, not 48%.
An apology is in order.