Would add something poetic or meaningful if I could muster it, but I was very taken by @HurstLlama's little piece.
My condolences, Cap'n Doc, to you and your mum. It can be a real bugger when a major plank in our lives is suddenly removed. At times of such loss there can be no words that bring comfort from a stranger but if you'll accept advice; let the tears fall, as they must, and then, denying nothing and taking your love and memories with you, shout, "Yo ho, my hearties, bring me that horizon!"
No, depending on what you mean by landslide. (though again, how can Labour be on the same as 2 years ago? At risk of sounding Corbynista like, I've never seen or heard the sort of things about him and his cohorts before)
No, depending on what you mean by landslide. (though again, how can Labour be on the same as 2 years ago? At risk of sounding Corbynista like, I've never seen or heard the sort of things about him and his cohorts before)
Welcome back Keiran, never go on holiday again.
Isn't a majority of 100 the conventional definition?
Everyone was about to fall asleep with this one horse race and not bother to get out of bed on June 8th to vote. At last we have a poll that tells us we should.
Johnson was a problem in 2015, and is a problem in 2017 too. But the difference is telling. Back then, he was deemed an asset. Now his own colleagues view him as a liability.
No, depending on what you mean by landslide. (though again, how can Labour be on the same as 2 years ago? At risk of sounding Corbynista like, I've never seen or heard the sort of things about him and his cohorts before)
I've heard absolutely nothing from vox pops, or reading comments on news sites, or heard in person that makes me think Labour are even close to 2010 or 2015. So unless there are a hell of a lot of shy Corbynistas I expect Labour to do a lot worse than those two elections, how much remains to be seen, but it could easily be once in a generation bad.
His personal vote was 18,000 effectively when he ran as an independent and failed. Surely he is going to romp home by 5 figures in a GE given its narrative and the fact he will be a Tory candidate.
Is this evidence of (a) the robot turnip Labour habit vote trooping loyally back to vote for the Useless One, or (b) statistical noise?
More evidence required.
it's evidence TMay getting rid of the pension triple lock is very unpopular, we will see more polls like it soon.
She needs to drop that fast, and instead drop universal pensioner benefits. Alan Sugar really does not need a bus pass.
OR... it really is just statistical noise, made to seem important by knee jerk overreactions by some people, e.g. me.
Three observations:
1. We have also had a 49:27 and a 49:26, released earlier today 2. We had an 11% lead a few days ago, which turned out to look suspiciously like an outlier 3. When a 16pt lead looks atypically *LOW*, we can see that we're well into "through the looking glass" country, anyway
As far as the triple lock is concerned, it's medium-term unaffordable in a way that comparatively trivial perks like bus passes simply aren't. But we've not had any announcements on this policy yet, or the manifesto. It's possible that the Government might duck the issue and commit to leaving it alone for the next Parliament, but we just don't know yet, do we?
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
His personal vote was 18,000 effectively when he ran as an independent and failed. Surely he is going to romp home by 5 figures in a GE given its narrative and the fact he will be a Tory candidate.
Surely he looks like a total chump now with Heathrow going ahead? Is he fine with that now?
Is this evidence of (a) the robot turnip Labour habit vote trooping loyally back to vote for the Useless One, or (b) statistical noise?
More evidence required.
it's evidence TMay getting rid of the pension triple lock is very unpopular, we will see more polls like it soon.
She needs to drop that fast, and instead drop universal pensioner benefits. Alan Sugar really does not need a bus pass.
OR... it really is just statistical noise, made to seem important by knee jerk overreactions by some people, e.g. me.
Three observations:
1. We have also had a 49:27 and a 49:26, released earlier today 2. We had an 11% lead a few days ago, which turned out to look suspiciously like an outlier 3. When a 16pt lead looks atypically *LOW*, we can see that we're well into "through the looking glass" country, anyway
As far as the triple lock is concerned, it's medium-term unaffordable in a way that comparatively trivial perks like bus passes simply aren't. But we've not had any announcements on this policy yet, or the manifesto. It's possible that the Government might duck the issue and commit to leaving it alone for the next Parliament, but we just don't know yet, do we?
We know politicians jump at the first sign of newspaper unfriendliness, so expect as little commitment as possible.
Is this evidence of (a) the robot turnip Labour habit vote trooping loyally back to vote for the Useless One, or (b) statistical noise?
More evidence required.
it's evidence TMay getting rid of the pension triple lock is very unpopular, we will see more polls like it soon.
She needs to drop that fast, and instead drop universal pensioner benefits. Alan Sugar really does not need a bus pass.
OR... it really is just statistical noise, made to seem important by knee jerk overreactions by some people, e.g. me.
Three observations:
1. We have also had a 49:27 and a 49:26, released earlier today 2. We had an 11% lead a few days ago, which turned out to look suspiciously like an outlier 3. When a 16pt lead looks atypically *LOW*, we can see that we're well into "through the looking glass" country, anyway
As far as the triple lock is concerned, it's medium-term unaffordable in a way that comparatively trivial perks like bus passes simply aren't. But we've not had any announcements on this policy yet, or the manifesto. It's possible that the Government might duck the issue and commit to leaving it alone for the next Parliament, but we just don't know yet, do we?
I expect the manifesto to guarantee pensions will rise by cpi throughout the Parliament and with increased personal allowance pensioners incomes will be safe
Since last July the EU has prepared for hard Brexit and has not suggested soft Brexit at any time. It is the default option and will happen.
Yep. They are in no mood to be nice - talk of punishment has made clear they do not want a tough but fair deal - and May has been preparing us to expect that.
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Technical question: Could it be that spiral of silence and similar adjustments make it difficult for Labour to poll below mid 20s unless their true support drops right off a cliff?
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
There is a real chance of a Shy Labour vote. After all it was the Tory chaos of the nineties that caused Shy Tories. We may be looking at the reverse.
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
Never - they're still about where they were 2 years ago, maybe a bit better, so even if they don't rise nationally much and the Tories do, they could still pinch a few off Labour and hold most of the ones they hold already, leaving them at worst static I think.
Making no progress would be dispiriting for them, but they've been fighting hard since a near wipeout, I don't think anything will put off the remaining ones.
His personal vote was 18,000 effectively when he ran as an independent and failed. Surely he is going to romp home by 5 figures in a GE given its narrative and the fact he will be a Tory candidate.
Surely he looks like a total chump now with Heathrow going ahead? Is he fine with that now?
Indeed he does but he is obviously thick skinned. Personally I thought it was great when he lost the by-election. realistically though if he can pull in 18,000 votes without an official political party, he is going to romp home over the LD given the national polls. It stands to reason.
Since last July the EU has prepared for hard Brexit and has not suggested soft Brexit at any time. It is the default option and will happen.
Yep. They are in no mood to be nice - talk of punishment has made clear they do not want a tough but fair deal - and May has been preparing us to expect that.
The EU has always been a fundamentally anti-British (and anti-American) organisation.
A look at the contrasting history of France and Germany compared to Britain and the USA between 1914 and 1945 shows why.
Corbyn is better rated than Hague and Foot were vs Blair and Thatcher
But that is perhaps the Labour numbers are so small that Corbyn raters are more numerous. Having said that, Labour numbers are comparable to 1983. So , maybe, Corbyn is doing better than Foot. Also, Scotland is different today.
For that matter, Corbyn's rating isn't much below EdM's, and there are probably more who really like him a lot. These are all low bars but the impression given by some that Corbyn is uniquely and almost universally despised is simply wrong.
I would like you to be right but I'm afraid the evidence just isn't there. I think Corbyn is universally despised and unfortunately for him that includes 75% of his own MPs who should know. I've never known anything remotely like it since I first got interested in politics.
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
There is a real chance of a Shy Labour vote. After all it was the Tory chaos of the nineties that caused Shy Tories. We may be looking at the reverse.
I would not be at all surprised if there is a certain amount of shy Labour vote. I think it will be eclipsed by the numbers staying home or switching, I just don't know how a party could eat itself so publicly for 2 years and lose no support, but although they remain admirably steady in the polls (if not at the level they would like) I just don't see how that is credible even assuming some shy Labour folk.
I think we all need to wait for the locals next week. They will give a better indication of the direction of travel for the parties as millions of votes will have been cast in a vast pre election poll. Also on the 8th May the conservative manifesto will be published
Corbyn is better rated than Hague and Foot were vs Blair and Thatcher
But that is perhaps the Labour numbers are so small that Corbyn raters are more numerous. Having said that, Labour numbers are comparable to 1983. So , maybe, Corbyn is doing better than Foot. Also, Scotland is different today.
For that matter, Corbyn's rating isn't much below EdM's, and there are probably more who really like him a lot. These are all low bars but the impression given by some that Corbyn is uniquely and almost universally despised is simply wrong.
I would like you to be right but I'm afraid the evidence just isn't there. I think Corbyn is universally despised and unfortunately for him that includes 75% of his own MPs who should know. I've never known anything remotely like it since I first got interested in politics.
So what's up with these polls? I get core Labour vote, shy Labour loyalists, people who don't want Labour destroyed, but do you believe 29%? Even most of the really bad ones are mostly 25ish.
It amazing when polls come thick and fast how we quickly we forget . Only this morning was yet another poll which showed Tories with 22% lead.
People seem to think the latest poll is somehow the "correct" one, even though the fieldwork for it might have actually finished *before* one released earlier in the day.
I think we all need to wait for the locals next week. They will give a better indication of the direction of travel for the parties as millions of votes will have been cast in a vast pre election poll.
Not always been that helpful in the past though. .
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
There is a real chance of a Shy Labour vote. After all it was the Tory chaos of the nineties that caused Shy Tories. We may be looking at the reverse.
I would not be at all surprised if there is a certain amount of shy Labour vote. I think it will be eclipsed by the numbers staying home or switching, I just don't know how a party could eat itself so publicly for 2 years and lose no support, but although they remain admirably steady in the polls (if not at the level they would like) I just don't see how that is credible even assuming some shy Labour folk.
I think there will be quite a disconnect in some seats. "I don't like Corbyn, but our local Labour people are OK".
Whetber it is enough to save seats, who knows.
I forecast Tory 425, Lab 125, each +/- 25 seats; LD 14 +/- 5 seats.
FPT @Black_Rook Thanks very much for the detailed breakdown on Tynemouth. Doesn't seem that tempting (8/11 on BF sportsbook) because I don't know anything about how active the local Tory organisation is. One imagines fairly moribund - I guess it's a question of how many kippers switch and how many Labour voters stay at home rather than how many Tories get out and vote.
Purely anecdotal - back when everyone was sharing that constituency map of %age of population who signed the petition to prevent Trump's state visit to the UK, I paid a bit of attention to the counter petition, to allow Trump's visit. The NE as a whole was statistically way higher than I expected as a percentage of population to be in favour of Trump, and Jarrow was by far the most pro-Trump constituency in the UK. I do think there's a lot of kippers up there and it remains to be seen how much of a gateway drug that will be for voting Conservative.
ELBOW for week ending Sunday 23rd gave the Tories a simple average of 45.67, a lead of 19.89%. That was 9 polls including Norstat.
I wanted to look at the individual polling tables like with the original ELBOW methodology from 2 years back, but sadly my dear old Dad passed away early on Saturday morning, quite suddenly while having his shower. He was 80. I didn't say until now because I was in the denial phase I guess.
Sorry to hear that Sunil. However old or expected it's never easy to accept. It just takes time.
The Conservatives are mad to let Zac anywhere near their Party again...
There are a lot of very angry Tories on various websites over this decision. They think they've effectively handed the seat to the LDs.
I doubt the voters apart from very vocal Lib Dems will care in RP. I think it is quite funny how people react to these things, especially on the net where you get some very bitter people who would like to be an MP but never will be sounding off. Fair play to them, we have free speech and still live in a democracy at the moment. If Goldsmith is the candidate he has been chosen by the membership of RP Tories (they will have democratically selected him from a shortlist of candidates). Personally I don't like him, however one has to look at what he can literally bring to the party in that seat in terms of votes (18,000).
It amazing when polls come thick and fast how we quickly we forget . Only this morning was yet another poll which showed Tories with 22% lead.
Sure, but it shows that while the Tories are up, Labour are not trending any further down on average, not yet. That's significant when one is considering if a landslide or a mere pounding win is in the offing.
And I do think some Tories are complacent on what it will look like if the CPS seeks to prosecute a signficant number of Tory MPs. For people making the journey to Tory for the first time, 'evidence' they are the dodgy party could cause hesitance.
Leicester the council just barely voted REMAIN by 51% but that means the whitest constituency of the 3 Leicester West voted Leave. it is 64% white british.
Liz Kendall has on the face of it a safe seat. But the tories have a massive 17% ukip vote to squeeze which is almost as big as her majority of 21%.
If you take just 5% from Labour to tory you get Lab 41% Tory 31%, if you then take away half the ukip vote and give it to the tories which is what the polls are showing then you get 39.5% tory for a result of:
Labour 41%
Tory 39.5%
Folks this is NOT a safe Labour seat IF the current polls are right.
Also remember in some places like London UKIP don't have 13% for the tories to squeeze so just like Libdem to tory swings were bigger in seats they held in 2015 so ukip to tory swings will be bigger in seats like this.
I would like you to be right but I'm afraid the evidence just isn't there. I think Corbyn is universally despised and unfortunately for him that includes 75% of his own MPs who should know. I've never known anything remotely like it since I first got interested in politics.
I rarely agree with you but on this I think you are quite right. How a leader who can't even command the support of his own MPs is meant to do as well as Brown and nearly as well as Miliband is beyond me. Corbyn's leadership ratings are atrocious, and it's not like the talent of the shadow cabinet and party policies are so good they make up for that.
By any normal reckoning Labour are heading towards a thumping.
It amazing when polls come thick and fast how we quickly we forget . Only this morning was yet another poll which showed Tories with 22% lead.
Sure, but it shows that while the Tories are up, Labour are not trending any further down on average, not yet. That's significant when one is considering if a landslide or a mere pounding win is in the offing.
And I do think some Tories are complacent on what it will look like if the CPS seeks to prosecute a signficant number of Tory MPs. For people making the journey to Tory for the first time, 'evidence' they are the dodgy party could cause hesitance.
Its possible, perhaps probable, that the Labour vote is in very bad shape among certain demographics / constituencies but strong in other demographics / constituencies.
And that Labour is holding strong where the LibDems should have potential to make gains.
It occurs to me that the Labour vote has stubbornly remained in the mid to late 20s no matter what crap is thrown at Labour. If it is not their floor, then so far the pollsters haven't been able to pick up movement beyond it outside MOE of 25. But they are clearly, at best, doing very badly, and the weight of anecdotal evidence is compelling that a lot of traditional Lab voters are discontented and disengaged.
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
There is a real chance of a Shy Labour vote. After all it was the Tory chaos of the nineties that caused Shy Tories. We may be looking at the reverse.
Was it, really? It was certainly extremely off-putting, but I'd have said that what caused the Shy Tories factor was the hatred exhibited by their opponents.
Off-putting is like choosing Mr Goldsmith as your candidate again after all that he's done - one wouldn't want to vote for him.
Shy is when you still intend to vote for X but don't feel able to say so.
We’d been to Pizza Express and fancied some chocolate back home in front of the telly. “Drinksworld” had just closed so I was running towards Sainsbury’s.
A bloke stops me.
“Sainsbury’s is closed mate. You won’t get any booze there. You’ll have to go to the Co-op.”
“Oh. OK. I wanted chocolate. I won’t bother. “
He says, “I always have something to eat”, and reaches into his rucksack. “I can sell you Kit Kat for a pound. I’ve got a receipt.”
He produces a 4 bar multi-pack of Kit Kat.
Now I’m keen. ‘Have you got two?”
“F*** off! Two for a pound! I’m doing you a favour here mate!”
“No. I meant two for two pounds. Have you got two?”
“What do you think I am? A f***ing sweet shop!”
(I bought the £1 pack and am now enjoying it. A bargain!)
Further observation re: the polls. Even if we ignore the Survation poll from the 22nd, which looks like an outlier, Labour have had two 27% scores and a 29% in the last five polls. Looking at the trend, it is by no means impossible that Labour is ticking upwards slightly through re-capturing a minority of the voters deserting Ukip, and by squeezing the Greens. The Lib Dem vote share looks to have levelled off.
I'm still not sure that I buy Labour's final total getting as high as 29% though - not when Gordon Brown only managed that, and Ed Miliband finished with just short of 31%. The leadership and economic competence indicators were a better predictor of the 2015 result than all those hung Parliament forecasts based on headline VI, and this time Labour is trailing on both of said indicators by much wider margins.
Is it possible that the polls are over-estimating Labour and under-estimating the Tories yet again? Guess we won't know until the votes are counted.
It amazing when polls come thick and fast how we quickly we forget . Only this morning was yet another poll which showed Tories with 22% lead.
Sure, but it shows that while the Tories are up, Labour are not trending any further down on average, not yet. That's significant when one is considering if a landslide or a mere pounding win is in the offing.
And I do think some Tories are complacent on what it will look like if the CPS seeks to prosecute a signficant number of Tory MPs. For people making the journey to Tory for the first time, 'evidence' they are the dodgy party could cause hesitance.
Its possible, perhaps probable, that the Labour vote is in very bad shape among certain demographics / constituencies but strong in other demographics / constituencies.
And that Labour is holding strong where the LibDems should have potential to make gains.
An alternate hypothesis - unfortunate for Lab if that is the case, since the overall impression is stability and it would make them think they are not in as bad a situation as they are.
Comments
Best wishes to @Sunil and @Murali_s.
Would add something poetic or meaningful if I could muster it, but I was very taken by @HurstLlama's little piece.
My condolences, Cap'n Doc, to you and your mum. It can be a real bugger when a major plank in our lives is suddenly removed. At times of such loss there can be no words that bring comfort from a stranger but if you'll accept advice; let the tears fall, as they must, and then, denying nothing and taking your love and memories with you, shout, "Yo ho, my hearties, bring me that horizon!"
I thought that was lovely.
The thing which puzzles me about this question: Why aren't they asking if the UK should Leave/Remain now?
Last time ICM asked, they found 68% in favour of Brexit now, and 21% against.
Welcome back Keiran, never go on holiday again.
We're ruthless like that...
https://twitter.com/Hayley_Barlow/status/857281201098412033
But even with that the fluctuation is MoE around a central point of 45-43; ie people are just reporting how they voted.
Everyone was about to fall asleep with this one horse race and not bother to get out of bed on June 8th to vote. At last we have a poll that tells us we should.
Or it could have picked up a nascent significant swing. But it's difficult to see why that would be.
This looks a lot like the beginning of OSJ ( #operationsavejezza ) to me...
#Tories4Corbyn
This poll isn't going to help Labour in Hartlepool and Torfaen now is it...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/26/tories-labour-boris-johnson-conservative-election
Johnson was a problem in 2015, and is a problem in 2017 too. But the difference is telling. Back then, he was deemed an asset. Now his own colleagues view him as a liability.
However, it is very bad timing.
Three observations:
1. We have also had a 49:27 and a 49:26, released earlier today
2. We had an 11% lead a few days ago, which turned out to look suspiciously like an outlier
3. When a 16pt lead looks atypically *LOW*, we can see that we're well into "through the looking glass" country, anyway
As far as the triple lock is concerned, it's medium-term unaffordable in a way that comparatively trivial perks like bus passes simply aren't. But we've not had any announcements on this policy yet, or the manifesto. It's possible that the Government might duck the issue and commit to leaving it alone for the next Parliament, but we just don't know yet, do we?
Could a Tory elections scandal be enough of an issue to help wavering Labour voters stick with the party against their own judgements, a 'I hate Corbyn, but we cannot let the Tories destroy Labour, not the baby eating, election stealing Tories' situation.
https://www.betfair.com/sport/politics
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/margaret-thatcher/margaret-thatcher-biography/11908715/margaret-thatcher-biography-general-election-panic.html
Since last July the EU has prepared for hard Brexit and has not suggested soft Brexit at any time. It is the default option and will happen.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2017/04/23/why-a-1997-style-landslide-or-even-a-1983-style-landslide-might-not-happen-but-maybe-a-2005-style-majority-of-66-will/
Making no progress would be dispiriting for them, but they've been fighting hard since a near wipeout, I don't think anything will put off the remaining ones.
A look at the contrasting history of France and Germany compared to Britain and the USA between 1914 and 1945 shows why.
I guess the Conservatives really don't want to win Richmond.
He's one of the three Conservative candidates who I simply could not vote for.
Are you hoping for a Labour split and an SDPmk2 to form an alliance with ?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4449220/Branson-bankrolls-Gina-Miller-s-bid-oust-Brexit-MPs.html
My labour fingers crossed for improved polling.
They would bounce up and down but the important thing to do was keep an eye on the average.
And then add 2.5 to the Tories and knock 2.5 off the popular left. I have a feeling they are the same thing this time around.
I'll bang up a spreadsheet to chart the average.
.
Whetber it is enough to save seats, who knows.
I forecast Tory 425, Lab 125, each +/- 25 seats; LD 14 +/- 5 seats.
Purely anecdotal - back when everyone was sharing that constituency map of %age of population who signed the petition to prevent Trump's state visit to the UK, I paid a bit of attention to the counter petition, to allow Trump's visit. The NE as a whole was statistically way higher than I expected as a percentage of population to be in favour of Trump, and Jarrow was by far the most pro-Trump constituency in the UK. I do think there's a lot of kippers up there and it remains to be seen how much of a gateway drug that will be for voting Conservative.
Sunil_Prasannan said:
ELBOW for week ending Sunday 23rd gave the Tories a simple average of 45.67, a lead of 19.89%. That was 9 polls including Norstat.
I wanted to look at the individual polling tables like with the original ELBOW methodology from 2 years back, but sadly my dear old Dad passed away early on Saturday morning, quite suddenly while having his shower. He was 80. I didn't say until now because I was in the denial phase I guess.
Sorry to hear that Sunil. However old or expected it's never easy to accept. It just takes time.
18, 17, 9, 21, 21, 18, 21, 24, 19, 22, 25, 23, 11, 22, 21, 22, 23, 16
mean = 19.6%
We'll get a few more YouGov's a week closer to election day, but we're not returning to the daily tracker.
And I do think some Tories are complacent on what it will look like if the CPS seeks to prosecute a signficant number of Tory MPs. For people making the journey to Tory for the first time, 'evidence' they are the dodgy party could cause hesitance.
Liz Kendall has on the face of it a safe seat. But the tories have a massive 17% ukip vote to squeeze which is almost as big as her majority of 21%.
If you take just 5% from Labour to tory you get Lab 41% Tory 31%, if you then take away half the ukip vote and give it to the tories which is what the polls are showing then you get 39.5% tory for a result of:
Labour 41%
Tory 39.5%
Folks this is NOT a safe Labour seat IF the current polls are right.
Also remember in some places like London UKIP don't have 13% for the tories to squeeze so just like Libdem to tory swings were bigger in seats they held in 2015 so ukip to tory swings will be bigger in seats like this.
I am doing some canvassing on Sat there, as it is our local LD target. We have a great local candidate.
By any normal reckoning Labour are heading towards a thumping.
And that Labour is holding strong where the LibDems should have potential to make gains.
Off-putting is like choosing Mr Goldsmith as your candidate again after all that he's done - one wouldn't want to vote for him.
Shy is when you still intend to vote for X but don't feel able to say so.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/26/alex-salmond-admits-snp-would-use-overwhelming-election-win/
We’d been to Pizza Express and fancied some chocolate back home in front of the telly. “Drinksworld” had just closed so I was running towards Sainsbury’s.
A bloke stops me.
“Sainsbury’s is closed mate. You won’t get any booze there. You’ll have to go to the Co-op.”
“Oh. OK. I wanted chocolate. I won’t bother. “
He says, “I always have something to eat”, and reaches into his rucksack. “I can sell you Kit Kat for a pound. I’ve got a receipt.”
He produces a 4 bar multi-pack of Kit Kat.
Now I’m keen. ‘Have you got two?”
“F*** off! Two for a pound! I’m doing you a favour here mate!”
“No. I meant two for two pounds. Have you got two?”
“What do you think I am? A f***ing sweet shop!”
(I bought the £1 pack and am now enjoying it. A bargain!)
I'm in a good humour at least.. not sure why?
This poll is also the start of the swingback to Labour...... never did understand that.
I'm still happy if Team blue gets a 50-maj.
I'm still not sure that I buy Labour's final total getting as high as 29% though - not when Gordon Brown only managed that, and Ed Miliband finished with just short of 31%. The leadership and economic competence indicators were a better predictor of the 2015 result than all those hung Parliament forecasts based on headline VI, and this time Labour is trailing on both of said indicators by much wider margins.
Is it possible that the polls are over-estimating Labour and under-estimating the Tories yet again? Guess we won't know until the votes are counted.
He was able to upset our old friend tim with his medical opinions.