politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Boris gets his own back on Theresa
Options
Comments
-
ThreeQuidder said:
Charles Delavan, a Clinton campaign aide, incorrectly legitimized a phishing email sent to the personal account of John D. Podesta, the campaign chairman.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Oh dear, oh dear...
Mr. Delavan, in an interview, said that his bad advice was a result of a typo: He knew this was a phishing attack, as the campaign was getting dozens of them. He said he had meant to type that it was an “illegitimate” email, an error that he said has plagued him ever since.0 -
It also created the EU. It was the EC before then.Patrick said:
Maastricht created the Euro. Which will come be seen as the folly which ultimately doomed the EU by future historians.ThreeQuidder said:
If Maastricht had been a good deal, we wouldn't have had 20 years of people pushing for a referendum to roll back ever closer union.TheScreamingEagles said:
Nonsense, your grasp of history of any era is rubbish.Morris_Dancer said:For that matter, Blair was the worst. He actively frolicked into Brussels, threw away half the rebate, and got nothing in return.
Thatcher getting the rebate was probably the last good deal the UK got.
The Single European Act and Maastricht to name but two were good deals the U.K. obtained post Fontainebleau0 -
Even in the days before email we were told 'don't write anything you wouldn't want to see on the front page of the New York Times.' Good advice then, good advice now.Sandpit said:
Assume that anything sent by email might end up as public domain.Carolus_Rex said:
It rather plays into the idea that the Democrats can't be trusted with emails, doesn't it?Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.0 -
Urgh, coffee flavoured anything ends up in the bin since my mum died. I hate them.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Jonathan, I prefer coffee-flavoured, to be honest.
Don't want Turkish Delight.
Turkish Delight is fabulous - trying to make it really tricky, how it ever came into existence is a wonder. Mine was always rather hydrophilic and kept going sticky despite oodles of icing sugar.
#PBSweeties0 -
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".0 -
Miss Plato, then if we ever meet and share mixed chocolates, the division will be a lot easier negotiation than the UK/EU one
Tried blackcurrant tea the other day. Was horrendous. I have decided fruit teas are the work of Satan. Tea should be tea flavoured.0 -
But thereby gave British consent to the creation of a Superstate on the continent of Europe - against 500 years of successful UK foreign policy. He should be burned at the stake. We could simply have avoided all the poison the EU has brought to British politics for decades if our miserable political class had followed the good instincts of the people and remembered that we are an island apart from the continent of Europe, with it but not of it.david_herdson said:
Major got opt-outs from the Euro and Social Chapter.Morris_Dancer said:For that matter, Blair was the worst. He actively frolicked into Brussels, threw away half the rebate, and got nothing in return.
Thatcher getting the rebate was probably the last good deal the UK got.
0 -
Funny no-one has picked up on this. Why do I get the feeling if the circumstances surrounding this shooting were to have happened in Russia, the conspiracy theory would have been splashed all over the British media?PlatoSaid said:
Another random person took control of Podesta's AppleMail and iPhone - stuck it all on Twitter before deleting the entire contents to annoy Podesta.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Anyone stupid enough to email their own password/username to a bunch of people is asking for it.
Assange indicated that the DNC staffer murdered in a random street shooting was the source. It was a very small nod, but seized on. I've no view here - but being a source, and then shortly later shot in the back in broad daylight doesn't help to defuse motives.0 -
# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #0 -
I drink Earl Grey - black. I discovered that bergamot - the perfumey tasting plant addition dries your eyes out something chronic. Took me ages to work out why my contact lenses kept catching after a few cups. What a weird side-effect.Morris_Dancer said:Miss Plato, then if we ever meet and share mixed chocolates, the division will be a lot easier negotiation than the UK/EU one
Tried blackcurrant tea the other day. Was horrendous. I have decided fruit teas are the work of Satan. Tea should be tea flavoured.
I wear glasses when drinking it now
EDIT - hate fruit teas bar lemon.0 -
Don't they always meet on park benches or standing on bridges? Or is that just on TV?Sandpit said:
Somewhat.Carolus_Rex said:
It rather plays into the idea that the Democrats can't be trusted with emails, doesn't it?Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Ironically, this is the sort of project for which they should have got a dedicated mail server, behind a VPN and firewall, with a white list of appproved and managed devices allowed to connect to it - exactly the same as any large company does!!!!!
Hopefully politicians and staffers of all stripes will learn from this.
1. Spend money on IT infrastructure and people, it can and will save your reputation. A mail server with support would have cost them no more than $100k a year, and the admin guy could probably have done a load more stuff with them at the same time - like secure their Dropbox or whatever, that they were lucky not to get hacked in the same way!
2. Assume that anything sent by email might end up as public domain. Have secret strategy discussions as actual meetings or video conferences, rather than by long email chains.0 -
Miss Plato, a lady with tea-spectacles is posh indeed
0 -
Just over 50% think a "Canada" deal a good outcome for the UK, with a large number of don't knows. Canada is vague. People project whatever they want onto it. Canada, as defined by Yougov probably won't be on offer.HYUFD said:
Compared to hard Brexit or a Norway EFTA option a Canada style deal was the only one which had a majority saying it would respect the referendum result and be a positive outcome for the UK
There aren't any good choices at this stage; only least bad choices.0 -
Actually, it didn't.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, perversely, that may be skewed by Muslims living in enclaves. The recent Casey Report said some there believed 75% of the UK was Muslim.
https://twitter.com/miqdaad/status/8083564658115543040 -
# Do they know its Brexit? #0
-
I suppose you only drink Yorkshire Tea!Morris_Dancer said:Miss Plato, then if we ever meet and share mixed chocolates, the division will be a lot easier negotiation than the UK/EU one
Tried blackcurrant tea the other day. Was horrendous. I have decided fruit teas are the work of Satan. Tea should be tea flavoured.0 -
From experience as that IT director, the C-Suite can have no common sense or understanding of the technology and the SOPs for using it, need to be walked through stuff very slowly to make sure they understand. This includes reasons for why we do things as we do, and the consequences of screw ups - which for someone with a public profile means having your emails/photos/contacts on the front page of the newspaper.PlatoSaid said:
I can forgive someone making a silly click-error - never done it myself that I know of, but it could happen.ThreeQuidder said:
Charles Delavan, a Clinton campaign aide, incorrectly legitimized a phishing email sent to the personal account of John D. Podesta, the campaign chairman.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Oh dear, oh dear...
Emailing your username and password to a bunch of people is cretinous. Who on PB would do this? It's worse than falling for a Nigerian Prince offering you £50m.
Basic stuff, which the DNC utterly failed to implement properly.0 -
Cliff's classic:Jonathan said:# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #
# Brexit time, Leavers do whine #0 -
# Feed the trolls... #Jonathan said:# Do they know its Brexit? #
# Let them know it's Brexit time #0 -
They never spend any money. Its amazing how people who should know better cheapskate on vital infrastructure.Sandpit said:
Somewhat.Carolus_Rex said:
It rather plays into the idea that the Democrats can't be trusted with emails, doesn't it?Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Ironically, this is the sort of project for which they should have got a dedicated mail server, behind a VPN and firewall, with a white list of appproved and managed devices allowed to connect to it - exactly the same as any large company does!!!!!
Hopefully politicians and staffers of all stripes will learn from this.
1. Spend money on IT infrastructure and people, it can and will save your reputation. A mail server with support would have cost them no more than $100k a year, and the admin guy could probably have done a load more stuff with them at the same time - like secure their Dropbox or whatever, that they were lucky not to get hacked in the same way!
2. Assume that anything sent by email might end up as public domain. Have secret strategy discussions as actual meetings or video conferences, rather than by long email chains.0 -
Perhaps one of the reasons for that gap is that the problems associated with the Muslim population in the particular country is - or appears to be - out of all proportion to the actual number of Muslims in the country and, indeed, may feel intractable and/or to be getting worse. If you were French, for instance, after the last few years, you might well feel that you had (a) a large Muslim population; and (b) that some of them were a blithering nuisance, to put it at its mildest.TheScreamingEagles said:
0 -
Did I really say Leavers?SandyRentool said:
Cliff's classic:Jonathan said:# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #
# Brexit time, Leavers do whine #
I meant to say Remainers!0 -
Mr. Rentool, I'm not fussy, really. Beyond it being tea and not some fruity monstrosity.
Mr. Meeks, cheers for that update. However, it may still be the case (or not, though it's plausible) that those in enclaves substantially overestimate the number of Muslims in the UK.
Be interested to get hard facts on that, and corresponding data on large Polish communities (although I'd guess they're less prone to enclaves).0 -
It's been extensively covered:Luckyguy1983 said:
Funny no-one has picked up on this.PlatoSaid said:
Another random person took control of Podesta's AppleMail and iPhone - stuck it all on Twitter before deleting the entire contents to annoy Podesta.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Anyone stupid enough to email their own password/username to a bunch of people is asking for it.
Assange indicated that the DNC staffer murdered in a random street shooting was the source. It was a very small nod, but seized on. I've no view here - but being a source, and then shortly later shot in the back in broad daylight doesn't help to defuse motives.
http://europe.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murder-dnc-hack-julian-assange-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-492084?rm=eu0 -
a classic Freudian slip!SandyRentool said:
Did I really say Leavers?SandyRentool said:
Cliff's classic:Jonathan said:# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #
# Brexit time, Leavers do whine #
I meant to say Remainers!0 -
Baby, it's cold outside (the EU).Jonathan said:# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #0 -
About a decade ago when I worked for the CTO of BT, the IT Corp guys cut off the research labs geeks as they were regularly breaching the security rules and exposing the other 80k employees to hacking.Sandpit said:
From experience as that IT director, the C-Suite can have no common sense or understanding of the technology and the SOPs for using it, need to be walked through stuff very slowly to make sure they understand. This includes reasons for why we do things as we do, and the consequences of screw ups - which for someone with a public profile means having your emails/photos/contacts on the front page of the newspaper.PlatoSaid said:
I can forgive someone making a silly click-error - never done it myself that I know of, but it could happen.ThreeQuidder said:
Charles Delavan, a Clinton campaign aide, incorrectly legitimized a phishing email sent to the personal account of John D. Podesta, the campaign chairman.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Oh dear, oh dear...
Emailing your username and password to a bunch of people is cretinous. Who on PB would do this? It's worse than falling for a Nigerian Prince offering you £50m.
Basic stuff, which the DNC utterly failed to implement properly.
I saw all sorts of WTFery that literally ended up as Dilbert cartoons. Scott Adams clearly had several sources and for those in the loop, it was very funny.0 -
For PB
# SO this is Brexit #
and that lesser know classic.
# A Trump is born #0 -
I mean here.CarlottaVance said:
It's been extensively covered:Luckyguy1983 said:
Funny no-one has picked up on this.PlatoSaid said:
Another random person took control of Podesta's AppleMail and iPhone - stuck it all on Twitter before deleting the entire contents to annoy Podesta.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Anyone stupid enough to email their own password/username to a bunch of people is asking for it.
Assange indicated that the DNC staffer murdered in a random street shooting was the source. It was a very small nod, but seized on. I've no view here - but being a source, and then shortly later shot in the back in broad daylight doesn't help to defuse motives.
http://europe.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murder-dnc-hack-julian-assange-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-492084?rm=eu0 -
A wee, seasonal, bogof bogeyman gift for the Brexityoons.
'Alex Salmond due to meet Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels'
http://tinyurl.com/h7xx6nz
0 -
I'm Dreaming of a Blue, Red and White Brexit.
Hard Brexit Everyone0 -
#Brexit day in the workhousewilliamglenn said:0 -
Wouldn't like to foot that lunch bill.Theuniondivvie said:A wee, seasonal, bogof bogeyman gift for the Brexityoons.
'Alex Salmond due to meet Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels'
http://tinyurl.com/h7xx6nz0 -
# In the Brexit winter, frosty wind made moan #williamglenn said:
0 -
Mr. Divvie, concerns must be raised that a smugological singularity could occur when Salmond and Juncker meet.0
-
God help you merry gentlemen.0
-
Charles said:
0 -
Hacktevists vs Faketevists:
https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/faketivist-vs-hacktivist-how-they-differ/0 -
UK economy really in a holding pattern when it comes to employment and unemployment, a few people shuffling in/out of the workforce but not much else.
Pay rises of 2.6% will however help them to outpace inflation, if indeed that rises.0 -
There's always a line between security and efficiency, and a good IT department work with the business to manage that balance. Podesta was using a personal gmail account, on unmanaged machines connecting without a firewall or website logging software. It was a case of when rather than if he got hacked.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
Yes, other political organisations should take note of what happened to the DNC, they're the next targets.
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.0 -
0
-
# Away from the EU /
No Brussels no more /
The Brexit vote happened /
We'll see what's in store #0 -
OT
Alan Ferrier
Who would have believed that the perfect Wikipedia photo caption could have been improved upon? https://t.co/pLedKWbs1o0 -
Good piece, but 'US-based Russian journalist' would be a better description than 'Putin expert'. If a Russian described Owen Jones as an expert on the British establishment you'd wonder who they were kidding.Gardenwalker said:This, by Putin expert Masha Gessen, is very good:
https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/12/13/putin-paradigm-how-trump-will-rule/0 -
A revealing Freudian.SandyRentool said:
Cliff's classic:Jonathan said:# It's starting to feel a lot like Brexit #
# Rocking around the Brexit tree #
# White Brexit #
# I will be lonely this Brexit #
# Happy Brexit, war is over #
# Brexit time, Leavers do whine #0 -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3743880/Alone-bar-guzzling-beer-depressed-trouble-girlfriend-newly-hired-Clinton-campaign-staffer-Seth-Rich-refused-ride-home-staggered-shocking-death.html#ixzz4HhigFJBSLuckyguy1983 said:
I mean here.CarlottaVance said:
It's been extensively covered:Luckyguy1983 said:
Funny no-one has picked up on this.PlatoSaid said:
Another random person took control of Podesta's AppleMail and iPhone - stuck it all on Twitter before deleting the entire contents to annoy Podesta.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Anyone stupid enough to email their own password/username to a bunch of people is asking for it.
Assange indicated that the DNC staffer murdered in a random street shooting was the source. It was a very small nod, but seized on. I've no view here - but being a source, and then shortly later shot in the back in broad daylight doesn't help to defuse motives.
http://europe.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murder-dnc-hack-julian-assange-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-492084?rm=eu0 -
And if he'd vetoed it, the other members would just have created the Euro without us. No British PM could have prevented the development of the Euro and, hence, the proto-state the EU has become.Patrick said:
But thereby gave British consent to the creation of a Superstate on the continent of Europe - against 500 years of successful UK foreign policy. He should be burned at the stake. We could simply have avoided all the poison the EU has brought to British politics for decades if our miserable political class had followed the good instincts of the people and remembered that we are an island apart from the continent of Europe, with it but not of it.david_herdson said:
Major got opt-outs from the Euro and Social Chapter.Morris_Dancer said:For that matter, Blair was the worst. He actively frolicked into Brussels, threw away half the rebate, and got nothing in return.
Thatcher getting the rebate was probably the last good deal the UK got.
But Major kept Britain out (at a time when the debate was almost entirely 'more Europe' or 'no more Europe', not 'less Europe'), and kept Britain within the Single Market (which still hadn't been concluded at the time).0 -
Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'0
-
Mr. Eagles, or an action slip.
[For those unaware, the much-less-referred-to 'action slip' is when you just do or say something wrong, whether saying you want mushy peas when you don't, or putting the toothpaste in the washing basket].0 -
I always thought Don't Cry for Me Argentina would be worth a Brexit versionTheScreamingEagles said:Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'
Perhaps Don't Cry for Me José Manuel Barroso... the truth is I never left you?0 -
But he's such a hero:Luckyguy1983 said:
Wouldn't like to foot that lunch bill.Theuniondivvie said:A wee, seasonal, bogof bogeyman gift for the Brexityoons.
'Alex Salmond due to meet Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels'
http://tinyurl.com/h7xx6nz
Through his leadership, he has helped transform Scotland into a fair, open and democratic society.
http://www.ideasforeurope.eu/conference/coppieters-awards-2016-to-honor-alex-salmond/0 -
Yes, certain departments are always trouble. Tech guys doing development or research are always pains in the proverbial, as are marketing and their need to move massive files and send out emails by the hundred thousand. Lab guys should really have their own separate network well away from the corporate one.PlatoSaid said:
About a decade ago when I worked for the CTO of BT, the IT Corp guys cut off the research labs geeks as they were regularly breaching the security rules and exposing the other 80k employees to hacking.Sandpit said:
From experience as that IT director, the C-Suite can have no common sense or understanding of the technology and the SOPs for using it, need to be walked through stuff very slowly to make sure they understand. This includes reasons for why we do things as we do, and the consequences of screw ups - which for someone with a public profile means having your emails/photos/contacts on the front page of the newspaper.PlatoSaid said:
I can forgive someone making a silly click-error - never done it myself that I know of, but it could happen.ThreeQuidder said:
Charles Delavan, a Clinton campaign aide, incorrectly legitimized a phishing email sent to the personal account of John D. Podesta, the campaign chairman.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Oh dear, oh dear...
Emailing your username and password to a bunch of people is cretinous. Who on PB would do this? It's worse than falling for a Nigerian Prince offering you £50m.
Basic stuff, which the DNC utterly failed to implement properly.
I saw all sorts of WTFery that literally ended up as Dilbert cartoons. Scott Adams clearly had several sources and for those in the loop, it was very funny.
Yes, one has seen loads of Dilbery cartoons over the last couple of decades. There was a good documentary about it on TV a few years back - 'The IT Crowd' I think they called it. 0 -
Loved seeing that again! I for one will not be satisfied with a Brexit that does anything less than stop the EU taking all our FISH and MONEY.foxinsoxuk said:https://youtu.be/BBi-KXc0CRk
We need a Christmas version...0 -
Is it really so surprising that many people over estimate the number of muslims in these countries? I wouldn't say so, I would be surprised if they didn'tCyclefree said:
Perhaps one of the reasons for that gap is that the problems associated with the Muslim population in the particular country is - or appears to be - out of all proportion to the actual number of Muslims in the country and, indeed, may feel intractable and/or to be getting worse. If you were French, for instance, after the last few years, you might well feel that you had (a) a large Muslim population; and (b) that some of them were a blithering nuisance, to put it at its mildest.TheScreamingEagles said:
Many of the main news stories of recent times feature Muslims, be it terrorism, Burqas, Trojan Horse schools, immigration, lack of integration. People overestimate the number of air disaters for the same reasons, people probably think there are more murderers and rapists than there are in fact as well
When a new group of people arrive in the country and look different, dress differently, live by different rules, this is going to be heavily reported, and so it is natural to over estimate their number.
If you took a photo in the street containing 100 people, 5 wearing Burqas and 10 wearing scarves, I reckon people shown the picture quickly would say more were wearing Burqas than scarves
0 -
Agree - it's inconsistent with the rest of the email......Sandpit said:
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
If it was 'illegitimate' I'd write DO NOT CLICK THE LINK......not 'change your password'....0 -
Or perhaps a cover version of Amy Winehouse's classic, Leave Is A Losing Game:TheWhiteRabbit said:
I always thought Don't Cry for Me Argentina would be worth a Brexit versionTheScreamingEagles said:Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'
Perhaps Don't Cry for Me José Manuel Barroso... the truth is I never left you?
"One I wished, I never played
Oh, what a mess we made
And now the final frame
Leave is a losing game"
0 -
F1: not really news, but I did like Rosberg's reaction to a rather obvious (perhaps stupid) question here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/383105030 -
Or use typewriters like that nice Mr PutinSandyRentool said:
Don't they always meet on park benches or standing on bridges? Or is that just on TV?Sandpit said:
Somewhat.Carolus_Rex said:
It rather plays into the idea that the Democrats can't be trusted with emails, doesn't it?Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Ironically, this is the sort of project for which they should have got a dedicated mail server, behind a VPN and firewall, with a white list of appproved and managed devices allowed to connect to it - exactly the same as any large company does!!!!!
Hopefully politicians and staffers of all stripes will learn from this.
1. Spend money on IT infrastructure and people, it can and will save your reputation. A mail server with support would have cost them no more than $100k a year, and the admin guy could probably have done a load more stuff with them at the same time - like secure their Dropbox or whatever, that they were lucky not to get hacked in the same way!
2. Assume that anything sent by email might end up as public domain. Have secret strategy discussions as actual meetings or video conferences, rather than by long email chains.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-232823080 -
Or 'EU know I'm no good'AlastairMeeks said:
Or perhaps a cover version of Amy Winehouse's classic, Leave Is A Losing Game:TheWhiteRabbit said:
I always thought Don't Cry for Me Argentina would be worth a Brexit versionTheScreamingEagles said:Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'
Perhaps Don't Cry for Me José Manuel Barroso... the truth is I never left you?
"One I wished, I never played
Oh, what a mess we made
And now the final frame
Leave is a losing game"0 -
I used to get more annoyed by marketing peeps breaking regulations and offering stuff we simply couldn't deliver.Sandpit said:
Yes, certain departments are always trouble. Tech guys doing development or research are always pains in the proverbial, as are marketing and their need to move massive files and send out emails by the hundred thousand. Lab guys should really have their own separate network well away from the corporate one.PlatoSaid said:
About a decade ago when I worked for the CTO of BT, the IT Corp guys cut off the research labs geeks as they were regularly breaching the security rules and exposing the other 80k employees to hacking.Sandpit said:
From experience as that IT director, the C-Suite can have no common sense or understanding of the technology and the SOPs for using it, need to be walked through stuff very slowly to make sure they understand. This includes reasons for why we do things as we do, and the consequences of screw ups - which for someone with a public profile means having your emails/photos/contacts on the front page of the newspaper.PlatoSaid said:
I can forgive someone making a silly click-error - never done it myself that I know of, but it could happen.ThreeQuidder said:
Charles Delavan, a Clinton campaign aide, incorrectly legitimized a phishing email sent to the personal account of John D. Podesta, the campaign chairman.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Oh dear, oh dear...
Emailing your username and password to a bunch of people is cretinous. Who on PB would do this? It's worse than falling for a Nigerian Prince offering you £50m.
Basic stuff, which the DNC utterly failed to implement properly.
I saw all sorts of WTFery that literally ended up as Dilbert cartoons. Scott Adams clearly had several sources and for those in the loop, it was very funny.
Yes, one has seen loads of Dilbery cartoons over the last couple of decades. There was a good documentary about it on TV a few years back - 'The IT Crowd' I think they called it.
Before BT, I was at Mercury and it was a nightmare.0 -
Yes, and then I'd pick up the phone to the guy a minute or two later, and talk him through the password reset process. Emails like that are big red alarms - or should be.CarlottaVance said:
Agree - it's inconsistent with the rest of the email......Sandpit said:
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
If it was 'illegitimate' I'd write DO NOT CLICK THE LINK......not 'change your password'....0 -
Mr. Eagles, surprised you haven't gone Eurovision.
Hard Brexit, Hallelujah0 -
The other EU members are sovereign states, he couldn't have stopped them signing a treaty with each other. He could have forced them to use a separate institution for the Euro and the Social Chapter parallel to the EU, but that would have had the same outcome, except with less influence over it.Patrick said:
But thereby gave British consent to the creation of a Superstate on the continent of Europe - against 500 years of successful UK foreign policy. He should be burned at the stake. We could simply have avoided all the poison the EU has brought to British politics for decades if our miserable political class had followed the good instincts of the people and remembered that we are an island apart from the continent of Europe, with it but not of it.david_herdson said:
Major got opt-outs from the Euro and Social Chapter.Morris_Dancer said:For that matter, Blair was the worst. He actively frolicked into Brussels, threw away half the rebate, and got nothing in return.
Thatcher getting the rebate was probably the last good deal the UK got.0 -
The late Colonel Abrams "Trapped" is more suitableAlastairMeeks said:
Or perhaps a cover version of Amy Winehouse's classic, Leave Is A Losing Game:TheWhiteRabbit said:
I always thought Don't Cry for Me Argentina would be worth a Brexit versionTheScreamingEagles said:Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'
Perhaps Don't Cry for Me José Manuel Barroso... the truth is I never left you?
"One I wished, I never played
Oh, what a mess we made
And now the final frame
Leave is a losing game"
"I guess Remoaners think that I'm not good enough for EU
I can tell the way they act and their attitudes
Oh, oh I'm trapped
Like a fool I'm in a cage
I voted out
You see I'm trapped
Can't you see I'm so confused?
I can't get out"0 -
My favourite one of those was when I threw the empty yoghurt pot in the sink and the spoon in the bin...Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, or an action slip.
[For those unaware, the much-less-referred-to 'action slip' is when you just do or say something wrong, whether saying you want mushy peas when you don't, or putting the toothpaste in the washing basket].0 -
Interesting.I read a copy of the Mail (and Sun) in a pub where I'd nothing else to do (intrigued to find I really disliked every article outside the sports section, unlike the Sun, most of which seemed relatively innocuous), and they were scathing about it with two angles - one, the predictable one that all these people were pretty horrible (ironically they picked on one cast member for being inufficiently tolerant of gay men, which you'd think the Mail might have been fine with), but the other being a more plausible one one that the producers had obviously picked a variety of people with extreme views who would make good TV.foxinsoxuk said:umber of Muslims would probably halve if only observant Muslims were included too.
#Muslimslikeus was quite fascinating on BBC2, well worth catching.
A less jaundiced view is intriguing - what did you particularly like?0 -
And from the same musical:TheWhiteRabbit said:
I always thought Don't Cry for Me Argentina would be worth a Brexit versionTheScreamingEagles said:Surely Leavers will be singing 'Je ne Bregret Rien'
Perhaps Don't Cry for Me José Manuel Barroso... the truth is I never left you?
# So what happens now?
Another Brexit in another poll
Where am I going to?
Don't ask anymore... #0 -
Knowing me, knowing EU
It's the best we can do.0 -
Thereis a balance, but in my own line of employment sometimes the security is so cumbersome as to make the system unusable.Sandpit said:
There's always a line between security and efficiency, and a good IT department work with the business to manage that balance. Podesta was using a personal gmail account, on unmanaged machines connecting without a firewall or website logging software. It was a case of when rather than if he got hacked.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
Yes, other political organisations should take note of what happened to the DNC, they're the next targets.
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.0 -
I'm so Brexcited
And I just can't hide it
I'm about to Take Back Control and I think I like it
I'm so Brexcited
And I just can't hide it
And I know
I know
I know
I know
I know
I want Out
I want Out
0 -
Actually if I get the time, one of Sunday's threads will be about the song Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen and a couple more of his tracks/lyrics, all about Brexit, it begins quite controversially.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, surprised you haven't gone Eurovision.
Hard Brexit, Hallelujah
'For those of who consider Brexit and Trump political and moral syphillis, it truly has been a shit show of a year'0 -
Verse 2/3:Lennon said:# Away from the EU /
No Brussels no more /
The Brexit vote happened /
We'll see what's in store #
# With Boris as PM /
We'd be in a mess /
Theresa and Hammond /
Pure greatness, no less #
# Her brown leather trousers /
Should be no concern /
The Lib Dems must take heed /
You'll not overturn #0 -
Years ago at the place I worked, they did a survey of how many women worked there and how many were senior. The answers were not many at all to both questions. They then asked the senior men to estimate how many senior women they were and they all hugely overestimated the number. It turned out that they all knew the same 1 or 2 women MDs and thought that they must know only a few of them and that there were therefore more. It never occurred to them that they only reason these women MDs were so visible was because they were the only ones.isam said:
Is it really so surprising that many people over estimate the number of muslims in these countries? I wouldn't say so, I would be surprised if they didn'tCyclefree said:
Perhaps one of the reasons for that gap is that the problems associated with the Muslim population in the particular country is - or appears to be - out of all proportion to the actual number of Muslims in the country and, indeed, may feel intractable and/or to be getting worse. If you were French, for instance, after the last few years, you might well feel that you had (a) a large Muslim population; and (b) that some of them were a blithering nuisance, to put it at its mildest.TheScreamingEagles said:
Many of the main news stories of recent times feature Muslims, be it terrorism, Burqas, Trojan Horse schools, immigration, lack of integration. People overestimate the number of air disaters for the same reasons, people probably think there are more murderers and rapists than there are in fact as well
When a new group of people arrive in the country and look different, dress differently, live by different rules, this is going to be heavily reported, and so it is natural to over estimate their number.
If you took a photo in the street containing 100 people, 5 wearing Burqas and 10 wearing scarves, I reckon people shown the picture quickly would say more were wearing Burqas than scarves
If there are such problems associated with the relatively small Muslim populations these countries have, it does rather raise the question of whether it makes sense to permit their increase through immigration, unfair as that may be to individuals who do not create problems.
0 -
Mr. Eagles, that's just trying to goad people. In the loose definition used by an inept media, it sounds like a troll post.
Mr. Quidder, they can be quite disconcerting (and irksome, depending what you screw up)...0 -
As if I would troll/click bait people in a thread header.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, that's just trying to goad people. In the loose definition used by an inept media, it sounds like a troll post.
Mr. Quidder, they can be quite disconcerting (and irksome, depending what you screw up)...0 -
Labour 'no more leaks' email.......leaks
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/81732/excl-email-warning-labour-staff-about-leaks-media0 -
One for the Kippers who found a purpose in fighting Brussels:Pulpstar said:Knowing me, knowing EU
It's the best we can do.
# It's funny, but I had no sense of living without aim
The day before EU came #0 -
I have just returned from a Cyber Crime Conference. One lesson I took away from it is that if you want to keep something secret (certainly on a personal level) use old-fashioned non-electronic methods. Not necessarily very practical in the modern world. But there you go. A shoebox in the attic with old-fashioned photos is less vulnerable than digital photos of your hanky panky on a phone, accessible to pretty much everyone as you sit in Costa Coffee.DecrepitJohnL said:
Or use typewriters like that nice Mr PutinSandyRentool said:
Don't they always meet on park benches or standing on bridges? Or is that just on TV?Sandpit said:
Somewhat.Carolus_Rex said:
It rather plays into the idea that the Democrats can't be trusted with emails, doesn't it?Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
Ironically, this is the sort of project for which they should have got a dedicated mail server, behind a VPN and firewall, with a white list of appproved and managed devices allowed to connect to it - exactly the same as any large company does!!!!!
Hopefully politicians and staffers of all stripes will learn from this.
1. Spend money on IT infrastructure and people, it can and will save your reputation. A mail server with support would have cost them no more than $100k a year, and the admin guy could probably have done a load more stuff with them at the same time - like secure their Dropbox or whatever, that they were lucky not to get hacked in the same way!
2. Assume that anything sent by email might end up as public domain. Have secret strategy discussions as actual meetings or video conferences, rather than by long email chains.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23282308
0 -
err new thread....
0 -
Mr. Eagles, David Cameron's 'Little Englander' phase didn't win him universal renown and unsurpassed glory.0
-
The sweetie in the bin and the wrapper in my hand.ThreeQuidder said:
My favourite one of those was when I threw the empty yoghurt pot in the sink and the spoon in the bin...Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, or an action slip.
[For those unaware, the much-less-referred-to 'action slip' is when you just do or say something wrong, whether saying you want mushy peas when you don't, or putting the toothpaste in the washing basket].
My best was during my A Level Chemistry practical. 3hrs of work - and I poured the contents of my experiment down the sink. It took about 5secs to register - I then I fell about laughing. There really wasn't any other response. I can recall it like yesterday, yet 30yrs ago.0 -
Absolutely.foxinsoxuk said:
Thereis a balance, but in my own line of employment sometimes the security is so cumbersome as to make the system unusable.Sandpit said:
There's always a line between security and efficiency, and a good IT department work with the business to manage that balance. Podesta was using a personal gmail account, on unmanaged machines connecting without a firewall or website logging software. It was a case of when rather than if he got hacked.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
Yes, other political organisations should take note of what happened to the DNC, they're the next targets.
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.
It is of course, much easier to make the system almost unusable - from the perspective of the CIO trying to cover his own arse - than to work closely with users to understand their needs before designing appropriate system security.
This, combined with huge legacy systems and equipment, civil service mentality, tight compliance and data protection rules, along with a reluctance to change anything, can indeed be a complete nightmare for those on the coal face.
The way forward is to engage with senior IT personnel, but on your terms. You don't want to fill in forms, go to a 'workshop' or 'discovery day' - you want a senior IT systems bod to follow you around for a day and see how the systems interact with your daily routine. Good luck!0 -
"You don't know me but I'm your IT guy, I'm going to talk you through your password reset process"...Sandpit said:
Yes, and then I'd pick up the phone to the guy a minute or two later, and talk him through the password reset process. Emails like that are big red alarms - or should be.CarlottaVance said:
Agree - it's inconsistent with the rest of the email......Sandpit said:
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
If it was 'illegitimate' I'd write DO NOT CLICK THE LINK......not 'change your password'....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bm5BDM-CIAAxcSF.jpg0 -
I maintain the best caption is:PlatoSaid said:OT
Alan Ferrier
Who would have believed that the perfect Wikipedia photo caption could have been improved upon? https://t.co/pLedKWbs1o
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_McPherson0 -
Proper prior planning.....edmundintokyo said:
"You don't know me but I'm your IT guy, I'm going to talk you through your password reset process"...Sandpit said:
Yes, and then I'd pick up the phone to the guy a minute or two later, and talk him through the password reset process. Emails like that are big red alarms - or should be.CarlottaVance said:
Agree - it's inconsistent with the rest of the email......Sandpit said:
FWIW I think the 'illegitimate' story is retrospective arsecovering. He fecked up.edmundintokyo said:
TBF his Gmail account was secured by Gmail, which did all the right things. They could have had more security but it would have cost them efficiency, and inefficiency is bad. There's a practical limit to how far you can secure everyday communications, as Britain will find out ahead of 2020 when Fancy Bear release whatever they've got on the Tories.Sandpit said:
What a mess. I could have 'hacked' Podesta's emails, which were on an unsecured gmail account, which they got into by having him click on a link to a dodgy password reset site they'd set up.CarlottaVance said:The NYT on Russian hacking:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
Given the amount of money in the DNC, their IT team were shit at setting things up, and shit at handling the problems when they occurred. They should have know that a political party would be a target for hackers
No sympathy. At all.
PS The bit where the DNC tech guy meant to say "this email is illegitimate" and brain-farted "this email is legitimate" shows why it's a bad idea to communicate in banal corporate bureaucrat-speak. He'd have far been less likely to bollocks it up if he'd set out trying to say something fruitier and more expressive like "this email is dodgy af".
If it was 'illegitimate' I'd write DO NOT CLICK THE LINK......not 'change your password'....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bm5BDM-CIAAxcSF.jpg
You make sure he does know you! The chiefs should know the IT director by name, and have his number in their phones well before he calls for something like that. This shit really isn't difficult, in any organisation. The DNC screwed up, and we all got to read Podesta's emails.0 -
@megalomaniacs4u
To many companies also skimp on training and planning, especially planning for a critical incident, which they regard as unnecessary costs. Short termism as ever in so many British industries.
The design and testing of critical incident plans was something of an interest of mine a few years ago. At a dinner I was sat next to a fellow who over the years had built up a very good financial services business (employed sixty odd people) and I asked him what provision/planning he had made for if suddenly he could no longer access his business premises for more than a day. The answer? None. "Why do I want to spend money on something that is never likely to happen? I have been in business for forty years and that situation has never arisen". He had no off-site duplicate data storage, no plan for accessing alternative office space with access to all his critical data, nothing at all.
Nine months later there was a fire in the building next door to his and the Fire Brigade wouldn't allow him and his staff into his offices for the best part of a week while they checked structural integrity etc.. Eighteen months later he had no business, but a lot of his former clients' lawyers wanted to talk to him.0 -
The Black Comedian was a great bloke, with a big heart. Devout but not intolerant and a wise peacemaker. Apart from the zealous convert they were a pretty innocuous bunch, and often full of insight.NickPalmer said:
Interesting.I read a copy of the Mail (and Sun) in a pub where I'd nothing else to do (intrigued to find I really disliked every article outside the sports section, unlike the Sun, most of which seemed relatively innocuous), and they were scathing about it with two angles - one, the predictable one that all these people were pretty horrible (ironically they picked on one cast member for being inufficiently tolerant of gay men, which you'd think the Mail might have been fine with), but the other being a more plausible one one that the producers had obviously picked a variety of people with extreme views who would make good TV.foxinsoxuk said:umber of Muslims would probably halve if only observant Muslims were included too.
#Muslimslikeus was quite fascinating on BBC2, well worth catching.
A less jaundiced view is intriguing - what did you particularly like?
As so often, converts seize on the externals of dress and rules without an understanding of the implicit internal way of life that lifelong believers have steeped into them. I see it in my own church too, and I speak as a convert of 20 years. I am just beginning to grasp some of the internals now, the externals were easy and obvious.
I think the same goes for migrants to a country also, and one of the problems of citizenship tests is that these focus on externalities like language over deeper internal values.0 -
A colleague of mine some time ago recounted an incident that occurred while he was working with a lumberjack company during the break at University (he was Canadian).PlatoSaid said:
The sweetie in the bin and the wrapper in my hand.ThreeQuidder said:
My favourite one of those was when I threw the empty yoghurt pot in the sink and the spoon in the bin...Morris_Dancer said:Mr. Eagles, or an action slip.
[For those unaware, the much-less-referred-to 'action slip' is when you just do or say something wrong, whether saying you want mushy peas when you don't, or putting the toothpaste in the washing basket].
My best was during my A Level Chemistry practical. 3hrs of work - and I poured the contents of my experiment down the sink. It took about 5secs to register - I then I fell about laughing. There really wasn't any other response. I can recall it like yesterday, yet 30yrs ago.
He would come home completely exhausted and developed a routine that the first two things he did every time he got in were to peel of his (now disgusting) socks, drop them straight in the washing machine, and go to the loo for a long wee.
One day, on autopilot, he just managed to realise what he was doing and stop himself after unzipping at the washing machine and taking aim at the drum. He breathed a sigh of relief at catching it just in time before realising that he'd already flushed his socks down the loo...0
![[Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/d2ea526b1b06ed109333f390c7ae956b_100.png)
This discussion has been closed.