Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Could it, should it, will it soon be Lord Farage?

An intriguing part of PMQs today was May’s response when asked if UKIP leader Nigel Farage will be given a peerage – this starting speculation that he will be. The PM’s response was “such matters are normally never discussed in public”.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Imagine his speeches to the Lordships
https://twitter.com/jonwalker121/status/798987476962377728
Would be apt for the Lords that the only way a man who failed seven times to become an MP joins Parliaments is via the unelected Lords
(who is "Lord Burma" by the way?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Knatchbull,_2nd_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burma
She considered this, and decided not to be called: "Lady ??? of Six Mile Bottom".
(I wish I could remember who it was).
If anyone was mad enough to ennoble me, I'd like to be called Lord Jessop of Water-cum-Jolly Dale"
I am the Daddy now!
https://youtu.be/HDPO9UG_CY4
Did manage to remind myself to visit the Imperial War Museum when next in Blighty though - his stunning collection of VCs is on display there.
Yes, but an element of making decisions faster than the opposition is proactively changing the environment/battlefield so that they are discombobulated and so take longer to make decisions.
The Trump version of this is to throw moral outrages around that are so outside the normal discourse of politics that people either don't know how to react, or react as per usual thinking this is politics as normal when it is not. And then as they finally react to the first moral outrage, he has already moved on to the next, and does not bother responding to their response - he has redefined the environment and his opponents are constantly playing catch up.
Whilst I definetly don't agree with Farage or his politics I don't really have a problem with him being appointed to the house of lords. People will go apeshit, but maybe then they will get more involved in politics, and not leave it to losers like me to campaign in elections.
Lord Alexander?
Doesn't Lots4 Archer have an Irish Mark as well Weston-Super-Mate
Going back further you've Hillsborough/Downshire and Wellington/Douro/Talevida/Wellesley
There was a young man of Kent.................. LOL
Burma (Earldom) was '47 (was already a Viscountcy before this)
Tunis (Earldom) was '52 (ditto)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/11/16/busy-tories-are-reason-pollsters-keep-predicting-wrong-results/
Please let me make it clear that I do not support UKIP but when you think how many the Lib Dems have in the HOL with only 8 MP's it does seem to be unfair
If made a Peer, Farage would have to resign as an MEP before taking his seat in the Lords.
This happened last month with Timothy Kirkhope (new Con Peer).
So means quite a big loss of salary + expenses.
It will be Omnishambles ++.
Those aren't Hammond's figures they are the FTs.
Many of them were made by the FT. And that's what remainers don't get. FT, Economist, Times - less credibility than before June.
The depth of the remainer defeat is still yet to sink in.
Why are we doing this again? Why is a Conservative government pulling down the roof when the forecast is for rain?
https://twitter.com/lennyletter/status/798941323965370368
"I love Hillary Clinton. I am in awe of her. I am set free by her. She will be the finest world leader our galaxy has ever seen."
" But the feminist hero never got to be a legend first. And yet she is one, easily surpassing Ben Franklin, Henry Ford, Steve Jobs."
"She belongs to a much more elite class of Americans, the more-than-presidents. Neil Armstrong, Martin Luther King Jr., Alexander Fucking Hamilton."
"She cannot be faulted, criticized, or analyzed for even one more second. Instead, she will be decorated as an epochal heroine far too extraordinary to be contained by the mere White House. Let that revolting president-elect be Millard Fillmore or Herbert Hoover or whatever. Hillary is Athena."
Grammar schools will make situation worse, says government commission
https://www.ft.com/content/59f1a080-abd7-11e6-ba7d-76378e4fef24
scene, when there are 104 Liberal Democrat peers, and only 3 for UKIP.
Reform of the House of Lords is, of course, a perfectly valid but separate issue.
Lord Farage of Hope?
I believe it is a nice village in Lancashire
http://www.cityam.com/253587/public-borrowing-could-overrun-100bn-over-next-five-years
And what is about lefty fanboys? Obama stopping the rise of the oceans and healing the planet ...
Which makes sense given the changed circumstances.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has drawn up the forecasts the government will present and officials acknowledge they have been grappling for weeks with weak tax revenues and an outlook for lower growth.
The consensus of independent economic forecasts, which are generally close to the OBR’s, show mediocre economic growth until 2020 with higher inflation and weaker business investment combining to slow revenues to the exchequer. Once converted by the OBR into likely tax revenues, the deterioration in the public finances will cumulate to around £100bn.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has estimated that a weaker economic outlook would lead to roughly £30bn in additional borrowing by 2019-20 before any gains from lower contributions to the EU budget are taken into account.
An official forecast along these lines would vindicate the Treasury’s pre-referendum central estimate of a £36bn annual cost of Brexit to the public purse but it would come only five years after the vote, indicating the cost might rise further in future.
https://www.ft.com/content/acb33786-ac16-11e6-9cb3-bb8207902122