While one who sings with his tongue on fire Gargles in the rat race choir Bent out of shape from society’s pliers Cares not to come up any higher But rather get you down in the hole That he’s in
Well blow me down with a feather, Unilever / Tesco blockade is over.
Who won ?
I bet Unilever will have gotten 3-4%, but that Tesco will freeze prices on Unilever products for a couple of weeks/months so that it looks like there was no price increase. Tesco will then gradually, a couple of pence at a time, raise the prices of various products.
"Our" campaign represents a "true existential threat" to "global special interests" - in particular to the "media" and "financial" interests who control Washington. The "global power structure" has "stripped our country of its wealth". The "Clinton machine" is at its centre. They meet with international banks to plot destruction in the US. Her and her "special interest friends". She's in it with the "New York Times".
"LOCK HER UP" chants the delirious crowd.
Earlier it was "USA! USA!"
(Someone should tell this guy that "phenomena" is already plural and he doesn't need to say "phenomenas.)
"This is a struggle for the survival of our nation." This election will determine whether we are a "free nation" or controlled by a handful of global special interests. "Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed."
Only the Suffolk, North Carolina poll was done after the debate, you have to look at the date of the surveys.
Using only the national polls done after the debate it's an average Hillary lead nationally of 3.6%.
She is leading by 2 in N.Carolina, by 3 in Florida by 2 on average in Nevada, all consistent with a national lead for Hillary of around 4 points.
You are behind the curve, the debate did wonders for Trump and cancelled the Tape.
You keep repeating this "Trump's debate victory" myth.
All the polls showed a Clinton win. You relate to other polls regularly but choose to ignore the debate polls. Very odd.
Imagine there were no polls on the debate at all, and look at all the other evidence of the campaign and other polling data. You would have to conclude that there was an event on Sunday that was favourable to Trump.
Only the Suffolk, North Carolina poll was done after the debate, you have to look at the date of the surveys.
Using only the national polls done after the debate it's an average Hillary lead nationally of 3.6%.
She is leading by 2 in N.Carolina, by 3 in Florida by 2 on average in Nevada, all consistent with a national lead for Hillary of around 4 points.
You are behind the curve, the debate did wonders for Trump and cancelled the Tape.
You keep repeating this "Trump's debate victory" myth.
All the polls showed a Clinton win. You relate to other polls regularly but choose to ignore the debate polls. Very odd.
If Trump hadn't won the debate then why has he bounced from being down by double digits from before the debate to less than Romney's defeat after the debate ?
Average national Hillary lead post-tape, pre-debate: 12.5% Average national Hillary lead post-debate: 3.6%
That's a 9 point shift, it's what you would see after a Debate Victory.
So kneel before Zod ect ect, I still make the right calls for debate victors.
Using only the national polls done after the debate it's an average Hillary lead nationally of 3.6%.
Silly. The debate was only four days ago. There are scarcely any national polls available yet that were done entirely after the debate. Nate Silver's site only shows three (and his highest rating for the pollsters is C+).
If you really want to confine yourself to polling after the debate, you need to wait until sufficient data, of sufficient quality, have been released.
Trump says that "if you take a look at these people" who are making sexual abuse allegations against him, you will "understand" that all of the allegations are lies.
Trump says that "if you take a look at these people" who are making sexual abuse allegations against him, you will "understand" that all of the allegations are lies.
It does seem odd that they decided to wait until now to speak rather than blowing him out of the water as soon as he became a candidate in the primaries.
Using only the national polls done after the debate it's an average Hillary lead nationally of 3.6%.
Silly. The debate was only four days ago. There are scarcely any national polls available yet that were done entirely after the debate. Nate Silver's site only shows three (and his highest rating for the pollsters is C+).
If you really want to confine yourself to polling after the debate, you need to wait until sufficient data, of sufficient quality, have been released.
There are 5 of them, that's a large enough number, even if one was an outlier it wouldn't have affected the average by much.
And also the state polls, 4 post debate state polls that also agree with the 5 national polls.
Her, Bernie, Biden, Elizabeth Warren all would have put Trump away by now, but Clinton is more concerned by gaining power then she is about defeating a far right Trump.
Trump says that "if you take a look at these people" who are making sexual abuse allegations against him, you will "understand" that all of the allegations are lies.
By the way, your premise that the EU has a logical conclusion through dissolution of the nation state is a sad, Brexit myth. It doesn't stand up to reason, or the facts.
No it is not. When has the EU ever stopped seeking to centralise more and more power to itself, and when has it tolerated any meaningful moves to return competences to member states? The commitment to ever closer union is enshrined in the Treaty of Rome and taken very seriously.
Besides, it won't let go of the Euro for love nor money, and that alone requires a federal treasury accountable to a federal government to make it work.
I've been following the debate on here for some time. I think people have far too much confidence on here that the current government can weather the course they have embarked on. There must be a high chance that the current government will fall, when the implications of the Brexit strategy fall in to place. As it is starting to now. Scotland is one issue, Ireland is another, the economic fallout of the fall in value of the pound another. And then there are a whole host of other interrelated issues, issues that have already been considered but will start to become more real over the next few months: what happens to trident if Scotland becomes independent. What happens to the land border in Ireland. and so on. These are all questions that we know about already, but they haven't been thought through by anyone to any conclusion, because there is so much uncertainty, and there are so many distractions as events roll out on a daily basis. The key developments I would argue is that there is now an organised 'opposition' in parliament. Businesses are spooked. The bizarre movements of the pound. The statements by Nissan, land rover, American banks. Petrol prices have risen 10%. In the town where I work every single private sector funded major investment project has been stopped or halted due to Brexit. I'm not saying anything new, but all I am saying is look at the volatility. It is completely unprecedented. The decision to go forward with leaving the EU would result in vast political, economic and constitional chaos. I don't believe that the government can weather it. I believe that they will fall, and that the tories will not be able to decide how resolve it when they call a general election, because the Brexitters are already starting to argue amongst themselves.
And it is anyones guess how it could play out after that.
I think people are in denial about the true scale of the political, economic and social volatility the UK is currently in. The phoney peace is currently coming to an end, and people are starting to wake up.
On topic, from a betting point of view, I think the odds that A50 wont be triggered until the second half of next year are very good.
Nice post.
My own view is that it's when no one can see a catalyst for change in sight that change occurs.
Massive cheers to Jessica Ennis Hill. A better role model for modern Britain would be very hard to find. She had my vote for Spoty in 12 and 15 and will have it again this year. You were fab Jess!
And jeers to Tesco. If the anglish poond drops by more than 15%, prices are going to go up. Period. I noticed petrol was up by 2p at my local BP on the way home. This is the cost of taking back control.
Trump says that "if you take a look at these people" who are making sexual abuse allegations against him, you will "understand" that all of the allegations are lies.
If they are all jumped up trailer park trash wwc bimbettes he may have just game overed himself.
Imagine there were no polls on the debate at all, and look at all the other evidence of the campaign and other polling data. You would have to conclude that there was an event on Sunday that was favourable to Trump.
Trump says that "if you take a look at these people" who are making sexual abuse allegations against him, you will "understand" that all of the allegations are lies.
It does seem odd that they decided to wait until now to speak rather than blowing him out of the water as soon as he became a candidate in the primaries.
not really. They were scared of coming forward and only felt comfortable after the tape and debate where he said he never did it. very plausible.
It is the logical conclusion affirmed by the opening passage in the Treaty of Rome. It is no myth.
You may construe it that way. I do not. And looking at the policy of France, Germany, and the U.K. within the EU over the last decade or so - neither do they.
Happily what you construe is of only incidental interest
To quote Sir Thomas More
The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.
michelle obama leading the attack on trump. This will be on prime time news. Will he take the bait and attack her back?
FLOTUS: "I can't believe that I'm saying that a candidate for president of the United States has bragged about sexually assaulting women."
.@FLOTUS: "We have a candidate for president of the United States that has said things about women that are so shocking...so demeaning"
FLOTUS on Trump tape: "It has shaken me to my core."
"It now seems very clear that this isn't an isolated incident," Michelle Obama says of Trump
FLOTUS: "This wasn’t locker room banter. This was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually predatory behavior.”
FLOTUS: "It's that feeling of terror and violation that too many women have felt.
Really powerful stuff.
Michelle Obama Attacking Trump is like Juncker attacking Vote Leave.
Except she can actually enthuase voters for her cause unlike Junker who has the opposite effect. Clinton needs her has she is currently only getting about 86% (same as Bills first term incedentally)of the AA vote compared to 95% for Obama.
Her, Bernie, Biden, Elizabeth Warren all would have put Trump away by now, but Clinton is more concerned by gaining power then she is about defeating a far right Trump.
Well, as Trump has shot himself in the foot/head/pussy that's fair enough.
Clinton is a machine politician. I guess the best approximation is Nixon. I have a very low opinion on her probity, but am open-minded about her potential as a capable Pres.
Imagine there were no polls on the debate at all, and look at all the other evidence of the campaign and other polling data. You would have to conclude that there was an event on Sunday that was favourable to Trump.
What evidence ?!?
If nothing else: pre debate the Republicans were making frenzied moves to remove him from the ticket, now they're not.
I've been following the debate on here for some time. I think people have far too much confidence on here that the current government can weather the course they have embarked on. There must be a high chance that the current government will fall, when the implications of the Brexit strategy fall in to place. As it is starting to now. Scotland is one issue, Ireland is another, the economic fallout of the fall in value of the pound another. And then there are a whole host of other interrelated issues, issues that have already been considered but will start to become more real over the next few months: what happens to trident if Scotland becomes independent. What happens to the land border in Ireland. and so on. These are all questions that we know about already, but they haven't been thought through by anyone to any conclusion, because there is so much uncertainty, and there are so many distractions as events roll out on a daily basis. The key developments I would argue is that there is now an organised 'opposition' in parliament. Businesses are spooked. The bizarre movements of the pound. The statements by Nissan, land rover, American banks. Petrol prices have risen 10%. In the town where I work every single private sector funded major investment project has been stopped or halted due to Brexit. I'm not saying anything new, but all I am saying is look at the volatility. It is completely unprecedented. The decision to go forward with leaving the EU would result in vast political, economic and constitional chaos. I don't believe that the government can weather it. I believe that they will fall, and that the tories will not be able to decide how resolve it when they call a general election, because the Brexitters are already starting to argue amongst themselves.
And it is anyones guess how it could play out after that.
I think people are in denial about the true scale of the political, economic and social volatility the UK is currently in. The phoney peace is currently coming to an end, and people are starting to wake up.
On topic, from a betting point of view, I think the odds that A50 wont be triggered until the second half of next year are very good.
Nice post.
My own view is that it's when no one can see a catalyst for change in sight that change occurs.
Indeed.
And if the government and/or Parliament overrides the people's democratic decision on EU membership, there will be a major upheaval.
Massive cheers to Jessica Ennis Hill. A better role model for modern Britain would be very hard to find. She had my vote for Spoty in 12 and 15 and will have it again this year. You were fab Jess!
And jeers to Tesco. If the anglish poond drops by more than 15%, prices are going to go up. Period. I noticed petrol was up by 2p at my local BP on the way home. This is the cost of taking back control.
We already knew that every unpopular decision would be blamed on the Leave vote, whether or not it had anything to do with it. A 10% price rise on a product made entirely within the UK has nothing at all to do with it...
Many people feel assaulted by Leave, a predator using deception to achieve its ends.
The special thing about that joke is the way that you tell it.
Remind us again how many of the aces the Remain campaign was holding ? PM leading it ? Most of the cabinet on side ? BBC cheerleading ? CBI onside ? TUC onside ? Civil Service onside ? Government funded press releases ? Headstart while leave had to wait for the end of the renegotiation ? Most of the newspapers onside ? Almost every business leader, actors, artists, author and other publically visible person cheerleader ? Obama ? IMF ? OECD ? European Leaders ?
Leave had Farage and George Galloway.
Remain lost because the public were concerned about immigration and remain didn't have a credible answer.
Imagine there were no polls on the debate at all, and look at all the other evidence of the campaign and other polling data. You would have to conclude that there was an event on Sunday that was favourable to Trump.
What evidence ?!?
If nothing else: pre debate the Republicans were making frenzied moves to remove him from the ticket, now they're not.
So it's down to the body being resuscitated as a triumph.
By the way, your premise that the EU has a logical conclusion through dissolution of the nation state is a sad, Brexit myth. It doesn't stand up to reason, or the facts.
No it is not. When has the EU ever stopped seeking to centralise more and more power to itself, and when has it tolerated any meaningful moves to return competences to member states? The commitment to ever closer union is enshrined in the Treaty of Rome and taken very seriously.
Besides, it won't let go of the Euro for love nor money, and that alone requires a federal treasury accountable to a federal government to make it work.
The Comission, like all bureaucracies, will always try to centralise more power. Separately, the nation states have consistently found more things to cooperate on.
But this is not the same thing as nation states dissolving themselves. Indeed, in the tussle between nation states and the Commission, the former do come out on top.
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
If Trump repeats his second debate performance I will upgrade his chances of winning the election for the first time since he choose Pence as his VP.
Supreme Court is pretty desperate. Have to say making it multi topic hurts Trump. Foreign policy is a decent topic for Trump.
Supreme Court (presidents nominations of) is why I think Trump might still just squeak it.
Whilst it might look like leaning into the culture wars by going big on SCOTUS is a good play for Trump I think it is a double edged sword - making an issue of it will equally motivate unenthused Dems to turn out to stop Trump nominating to SCOTUS
Massive cheers to Jessica Ennis Hill. A better role model for modern Britain would be very hard to find. She had my vote for Spoty in 12 and 15 and will have it again this year. You were fab Jess!
And jeers to Tesco. If the anglish poond drops by more than 15%, prices are going to go up. Period. I noticed petrol was up by 2p at my local BP on the way home. This is the cost of taking back control.
We already knew that every unpopular decision would be blamed on the Leave vote, whether or not it had anything to do with it. A 10% price rise on a product made entirely within the UK has nothing at all to do with it...
That cannot be right.. the brexiters said it would hardly be noticed....
Many people feel assaulted by Leave, a predator using deception to achieve its ends.
The special thing about that joke is the way that you tell it.
Remind us again how many of the aces the Remain campaign was holding ? PM leading it ? Most of the cabinet on side ? BBC cheerleading ? CBI onside ? TUC onside ? Civil Service onside ? Government funded press releases ? Headstart while leave had to wait for the end of the renegotiation ? Most of the newspapers onside ? Almost every business leader, actors, artists, author and other publically visible person cheerleader ? Obama ? IMF ? OECD ? European Leaders ?
Leave had Farage and George Galloway.
Remain lost because the public were concerned about immigration and remain didn't have a credible answer.
And because the British public had never agreed with the Project. The EU was unsellable.
It is the logical conclusion affirmed by the opening passage in the Treaty of Rome. It is no myth.
You may construe it that way. I do not. And looking at the policy of France, Germany, and the U.K. within the EU over the last decade or so - neither do they.
Happily what you construe is of only incidental interest
To quote Sir Thomas More
The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.
Your Brexiteering Utopia has very little chance of becoming reality. Hopefully you realise this before we 48 percenters are consigned to the Tower!
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
Can you name one power assumed by the EU which on reflection they decided more correctly lay with the nation states in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity ? No ? Neither can I.
It is the logical conclusion affirmed by the opening passage in the Treaty of Rome. It is no myth.
You may construe it that way. I do not. And looking at the policy of France, Germany, and the U.K. within the EU over the last decade or so - neither do they.
Happily what you construe is of only incidental interest
To quote Sir Thomas More
The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.
Your Brexiteering Utopia has very little chance of becoming reality. Hopefully you realise this before we 48 percenters are consigned to the Tower!
Trump: "This is our moment of reckoning as a society, and as a civilisation. I didn't need to do this. Believe me. (...) I'm doing it because this country has given me so much (...) and I feel so strongly that it's my turn to give back to the country that I love."
"In my former life, I was an insider (...) Now I'm being punished for leaving the special club and revealing to you the terrible things that are going on."
"Because I used to be part of the club, I'm the only one who can fix it".
"The dark clouds hanging over our government can be lifted (...) It all depends on whether we let the corrupt media decide our future (...) or the American people decide our future"
Very true. Speaking as a former stock controller in a supermarket distribution centre. The cycle through changing pack sizes was well known. The best time to spot them is just after a special offer finishes.
By the way, your premise that the EU has a logical conclusion through dissolution of the nation state is a sad, Brexit myth. It doesn't stand up to reason, or the facts.
No it is not. When has the EU ever stopped seeking to centralise more and more power to itself, and when has it tolerated any meaningful moves to return competences to member states? The commitment to ever closer union is enshrined in the Treaty of Rome and taken very seriously.
Besides, it won't let go of the Euro for love nor money, and that alone requires a federal treasury accountable to a federal government to make it work.
The Comission, like all bureaucracies, will always try to centralise more power. Separately, the nation states have consistently found more things to cooperate on.
But this is not the same thing as nation states dissolving themselves. Indeed, in the tussle between nation states and the Commission, the former do come out on top.
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
It isn't wrong. It is the basic raison d'etre of the EU. It is written right there in the treaties and is confirmed each time the ECJ makes a decision based on those treaties. It was the openly stated aim of the founders of the EEC and has continued to be the basic direction of travel for the EEC/EU over the last 40 years.
By the way, your premise that the EU has a logical conclusion through dissolution of the nation state is a sad, Brexit myth. It doesn't stand up to reason, or the facts.
No it is not. When has the EU ever stopped seeking to centralise more and more power to itself, and when has it tolerated any meaningful moves to return competences to member states? The commitment to ever closer union is enshrined in the Treaty of Rome and taken very seriously.
Besides, it won't let go of the Euro for love nor money, and that alone requires a federal treasury accountable to a federal government to make it work.
The Comission, like all bureaucracies, will always try to centralise more power. Separately, the nation states have consistently found more things to cooperate on.
But this is not the same thing as nation states dissolving themselves. Indeed, in the tussle between nation states and the Commission, the former do come out on top.
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
1. If the Eurozone fails to federalise then how is the single currency ever to be made to work properly? The vast economic disparities between the member states can only be addressed through the issuance of common debt, by a common government that can raise common taxes, and by outright fiscal transfers - not through a combination of punitive austerity measures and massive loans (which, in the Greek case at least, the supplicant debtors have no realistic chance of ever repaying.)
2. If the Eurozone federalises then it therefore follows that (a) states within it will cease to exist as sovereign entities, and (b) remaining non-Euro states will probably find themselves as fax democracies a la Norway.
I've been following the debate on here for some time. I think people have far too much confidence on here that the current government can weather the course they have embarked on. There must be a high chance that the current government will fall, when the implications of the Brexit strategy fall in to place. As it is starting to now. Scotland is one issue, Ireland is another, the economic fallout of the fall in value of the pound another. And then there are a whole host of other interrelated issues, issues that have already been considered but will start to become more real over the next few months: what happens to trident if Scotland becomes independent. What happens to the land border in Ireland. and so on. These are all questions that we know about already, but they haven't been thought through by anyone to any conclusion, because there is so much uncertainty, and there are so many distractions as events roll out on a daily basis. The key developments I would argue is that there is now an organised 'opposition' in parliament. Businesses are spooked. The bizarre movements of the pound. The statements by Nissan, land rover, American banks. Petrol prices have risen 10%. In the town where I work every single private sector funded major investment project has been stopped or halted due to Brexit. I'm not saying anything new, but all I am saying is look at the volatility. It is completely unprecedented. The decision to go forward with leaving the EU would result in vast political, economic and constitional chaos. I don't believe that the government can weather it. I believe that they will fall, and that the tories will not be able to decide how resolve it when they call a general election, because the Brexitters are already starting to argue amongst themselves.
And it is anyones guess how it could play out after that.
I think people are in denial about the true scale of the political, economic and social volatility the UK is currently in. The phoney peace is currently coming to an end, and people are starting to wake up.
On topic, from a betting point of view, I think the odds that A50 wont be triggered until the second half of next year are very good.
Nice post.
My own view is that it's when no one can see a catalyst for change in sight that change occurs.
Indeed.
And if the government and/or Parliament overrides the people's democratic decision on EU membership, there will be a major upheaval.
Calm down.
I know there is some daydream with you marching down Whitehall, pikestaff in hand, at the head of a mob of Brexiters, but that won't be required thank you. We're leaving. Really.
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
Can you name one power assumed by the EU which on reflection they decided more correctly lay with the nation states in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity ? No ? Neither can I.
I cannot. But it is hardly likely the EU (Commission) would do so. You might ask the same of Westminster, or even your local parish council.
It is for the nation states to repatriate powers if they think it advisable. The U.K. has been relatively unsuccessful at pushing this agenda probably because it has preferred and been quite successful at securing the individual opt-out.
Massive cheers to Jessica Ennis Hill. A better role model for modern Britain would be very hard to find. She had my vote for Spoty in 12 and 15 and will have it again this year. You were fab Jess!
And jeers to Tesco. If the anglish poond drops by more than 15%, prices are going to go up. Period. I noticed petrol was up by 2p at my local BP on the way home. This is the cost of taking back control.
We already knew that every unpopular decision would be blamed on the Leave vote, whether or not it had anything to do with it. A 10% price rise on a product made entirely within the UK has nothing at all to do with it...
That cannot be right.. the brexiters said it would hardly be noticed....
No, I think they said only people that drank G&T would notice
Comments
FLOTUS: "I can't believe that I'm saying that a candidate for president of the United States has bragged about sexually assaulting women."
.@FLOTUS: "We have a candidate for president of the United States that has said things about women that are so shocking...so demeaning"
FLOTUS on Trump tape: "It has shaken me to my core."
"It now seems very clear that this isn't an isolated incident," Michelle Obama says of Trump
FLOTUS: "This wasn’t locker room banter. This was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually predatory behavior.”
FLOTUS: "It's that feeling of terror and violation that too many women have felt.
Really powerful stuff.
While one who sings with his tongue on fire
Gargles in the rat race choir
Bent out of shape from society’s pliers
Cares not to come up any higher
But rather get you down in the hole
That he’s in
Spiro Agnew was threatened with impeachment as Vice President for crimes he committed as Governor of Maryland
Only the Suffolk, North Carolina poll was done after the debate, you have to look at the date of the surveys.
Using only the national polls done after the debate it's an average Hillary lead nationally of 3.6%.
She is leading by 2 in N.Carolina, by 3 in Florida by 2 on average in Nevada, all consistent with a national lead for Hillary of around 4 points.
You are behind the curve, the debate did wonders for Trump and cancelled the Tape.
Yeah this is a brilliant speech
Just a guess.
I missed that one.
All the polls showed a Clinton win. You relate to other polls regularly but choose to ignore the debate polls. Very odd.
"Our" campaign represents a "true existential threat" to "global special interests" - in particular to the "media" and "financial" interests who control Washington. The "global power structure" has "stripped our country of its wealth". The "Clinton machine" is at its centre. They meet with international banks to plot destruction in the US. Her and her "special interest friends". She's in it with the "New York Times".
"LOCK HER UP" chants the delirious crowd.
Earlier it was "USA! USA!"
(Someone should tell this guy that "phenomena" is already plural and he doesn't need to say "phenomenas.)
"This is a struggle for the survival of our nation." This election will determine whether we are a "free nation" or controlled by a handful of global special interests. "Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed."
By then one of the Bush grandchildren might have been clean long enough to win for the GOP.
Average national Hillary lead post-tape, pre-debate: 12.5%
Average national Hillary lead post-debate: 3.6%
That's a 9 point shift, it's what you would see after a Debate Victory.
So kneel before Zod ect ect, I still make the right calls for debate victors.
If you really want to confine yourself to polling after the debate, you need to wait until sufficient data, of sufficient quality, have been released.
And also the state polls, 4 post debate state polls that also agree with the 5 national polls.
Those are too many polls to brush off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3hJjWTLRB0
Besides, it won't let go of the Euro for love nor money, and that alone requires a federal treasury accountable to a federal government to make it work.
My own view is that it's when no one can see a catalyst for change in sight that change occurs.
Cheers to Bob Dylan..... Poet for our times...
Massive cheers to Jessica Ennis Hill. A better role model for modern Britain would be very hard to find. She had my vote for Spoty in 12 and 15 and will have it again this year. You were fab Jess!
And jeers to Tesco. If the anglish poond drops by more than 15%, prices are going to go up. Period. I noticed petrol was up by 2p at my local BP on the way home. This is the cost of taking back control.
To quote Sir Thomas More
The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.
Clinton is a machine politician. I guess the best approximation is Nixon. I have a very low opinion on her probity, but am open-minded about her potential as a capable Pres.
Laugh .... I nearly choked on my low calorie "meal" ....
He says he never knew the attacks on him would be so bad, but "Nevertheless, I take all of these slings and arrows gladly for you".
"Their media resources are unmatched." "The depth of their immorality is absolutely unmatched."
Are people hearing the dogwhistles? This is NOT going to go down well at the New York Times!
And if the government and/or Parliament overrides the people's democratic decision on EU membership, there will be a major upheaval.
Remind us again how many of the aces the Remain campaign was holding ? PM leading it ? Most of the cabinet on side ? BBC cheerleading ? CBI onside ? TUC onside ? Civil Service onside ? Government funded press releases ? Headstart while leave had to wait for the end of the renegotiation ? Most of the newspapers onside ? Almost every business leader, actors, artists, author and other publically visible person cheerleader ? Obama ? IMF ? OECD ? European Leaders ?
Leave had Farage and George Galloway.
Remain lost because the public were concerned about immigration and remain didn't have a credible answer.
But this is not the same thing as nation states dissolving themselves. Indeed, in the tussle between nation states and the Commission, the former do come out on top.
I'm certainly not saying EU governance is perfect - far from! - but the idea that it is a one way traffic to supranational serfdom is simply wrong. And very dangerous; it creates a mythical monster against which we are seem willing to sacrifice actual prosperity.
Crowd chants "USA! USA!"
Trump 34
Clinton 28
McMullin 20
Johnson 9
Shares my values:
Trump 24 yes
Clinton 29 yes
https://t.co/N35pQ3RpyN
second poll with mcmullan over 20
Yeah, like when the POTUS was taking selfies with the blonde female Danish PM.
OMG THE FACE ON HER!!
He sounds like a normal delivery, when he first used a teleprompter he was 100% wooden.
He cant be THAT thin skinned surely...
Clinton 28 .. Trump 34 .. McMullin 20
http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_UT_101316/
REMAIN 48%
"In my former life, I was an insider (...) Now I'm being punished for leaving the special club and revealing to you the terrible things that are going on."
"Because I used to be part of the club, I'm the only one who can fix it".
"The dark clouds hanging over our government can be lifted (...) It all depends on whether we let the corrupt media decide our future (...) or the American people decide our future"
2. If the Eurozone federalises then it therefore follows that (a) states within it will cease to exist as sovereign entities, and (b) remaining non-Euro states will probably find themselves as fax democracies a la Norway.
I know there is some daydream with you marching down Whitehall, pikestaff in hand, at the head of a mob of Brexiters, but that won't be required thank you. We're leaving. Really.
It is for the nation states to repatriate powers if they think it advisable. The U.K. has been relatively unsuccessful at pushing this agenda probably because it has preferred and been quite successful at securing the individual opt-out.
So Trump is not losing in Utah anymore?