Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The IN lead drops by 4% in the first published poll since t

12357

Comments

  • Mr. Eagles, Blair was very good at winning elections. But that's a means to an end. If you're a great campaigner and a feeble governor, you're falling into the school of Honorius.

    Completely irrelevant to the point I was making.

    Blair, nor Thatcher ever increased their party's share of the vote at a subsequent general election after taking power.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,421
    edited April 2016

    Completely irrelevant to the point I was making.

    Blair, nor Thatcher ever increased their party's share of the vote at a subsequent general election after taking power.
    TSE simultaneously clutching at straws, whilst expressing his man-love for Dodgy Dave.
    Bless :lol:
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,380

    Yeah, yeah, I get all that, but in respect of the Security Council (a) What's the 'EU machine', and who are 'they'? (b) What power do they have to bully us? (c) Even if they bully us, what power do they have over France and the USA, both of whom would veto any such change in any conceivable world?

    It's 100%, batshit-crazy, tin-foil-hat, green-ink bonkers. Sorry to be so blunt, but that's the reality.
    The Bilderberg Group will order our government to surrender their seat on the Security Council.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Dixie said:

    I feel guilty bringing up the 5th May elections, when all are talking about the referendum. Anyway, news on the streets of Wales and London is that UKIP will do better than polls. Might mean an extra seat or two in Wales and a London-wide Assembly member in London, at a stretch 2!

    Lib Dems are having a good campaign in terms of policies and organisations but no one trusts them! You may already know that.

    Labour say Khan is almost certain to be Mayor - '100%' is their view. mmm, let's hope not. Labour chaps say there is some gossip about him, not extremist led, that may leak!

    More Tories on the ground than Labour in London. Opposite of GE.

    Personally, it would be interesting to see who tops the mini-battle of Mayoral candidates between Greens (she's lovely), Lib Dems (automaton) and UKIP (surprising pleasant). I think UKIP might clinch it.

    Lastly, Galloway is bombing. Does he have any juice left in the tank? No one thinks so, but he is an unexploded bomb!

    Sorry, to bother you with all this.

    Don't apologise these posts are great. Ties in with chestnut's post about 'shy working class kippers'.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,442
    edited April 2016
    ICM Online

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Fieldwork April 22-24
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Resuming hostilities it seems that the smugness exhibited by Remainers recently over Obama was premature, those gloating about holing HMS Anglosphere look a bit silly.

    I called for calm heads and I'm repeating it, Remain may have to rethink their strategy, I can't believe they have a better card to play than Obama but let's see.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Dixie said:

    I feel guilty bringing up the 5th May elections, when all are talking about the referendum.

    Sorry, to bother you with all this.

    Not at all, a pleasant change ;)

    I think Galloway is yesterday's man now, expect an early migration on the after-dinner speaking circuit ;) His Mayoral video was amusing, but not the sort of thing that gets the voters hearts pounding - except from the exertion of running away!

  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    ICM Online (fieldwork post Obama)

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Exactly as predicted by the PB Groupthink Trust. Impressive.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,504

    ICM Online

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Fieldwork April 22-24

    People starting to make up their minds?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,421
    edited April 2016

    Me neither - and only a PCC election pending
    HMRC are a bit rubbish too.

    A couple of years ago, they sent me a letter saying I didn't need to file in a tax return for the subsequent tax year (had to file one for the previous year, it was because of my time in Colorado in 2011), and to ignore any request they would send to file one - but they sent a request any way.

    If they knew I didn't have to file a return for the subsequent tax year, why did they bother to send a request???

    :open_mouth:
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,534
    Sean_F said:

    The Bilderberg Group will order our government to surrender their seat on the Security Council.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited April 2016

    ICM Online (fieldwork post Obama)

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Pretty safe to say now that Obama was not the "knockout blow" Remain were hoping for.

    Bottom line is Brits do not appreciate being treated as the USA's poodle and having their President come over here and tell us what to do (even if the President is as well-liked as Obama).
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    ICM Online

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Fieldwork April 22-24

    We live in interesting times.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    runnymede said:

    Why, you ask yourself, has this anything to do with the EU? It's a nice example of how the EU's competences have become overstretched.
    Well it will make a few more quid for the Blairs, Cherie Blair QC's outfit are leading the charge.
    The legal challenge is being made against the new policy on the basis that it breaches the European Convention on Human Rights, and it constitutes unlawful grant of State aid to corporate landlords and to the owners of commercially let holiday homes contrary to articles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
  • weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    Thank you
    If REMAIN win (very likely), no matter if it is 50.5 - 49.5 it will be spun a la Hollande/ Sarkozy. "Massive Vote to Remain" - and the EU will say 'Thanks very much. Full steam ahead'.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,396
    Mr. Eagles, a different point, certainly.

    Cameron's achievement in the 2015 election is comparable to the long period Honorius kept the purple during a very regicidal period.

    Didn't stop him being a chicken-loving, ally-murdering incompetent, though.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    Pulpstar said:

    6.2 looks like a big price for President Trump, better than the 1.37 for nomination I think.

    The implied 1.28 for Hillary (Trump 4.5 implied) in the two horse race looks a bit short.

    Yes, I think that implied 1.28 is too short. Even if it's not, there are likely to be twists and turns in the contest which will provide trading opportunities.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    taffys said:

    Don't apologise these posts are great. Ties in with chestnut's post about 'shy working class kippers'.
    Ditto - great doorstep feedback
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,534

    Yes, I think that implied 1.28 is too short. Even if it's not, there are likely to be twists and turns in the contest which will provide trading opportunities.
    The main factor limiting the trading opportunities will probably be the level of denial meaning that the market doesn't react to events. Even if Trump starts leading the polls consistently Hillary will most likely still be odds on.
  • ICM Online

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Fieldwork April 22-24

    This poll certainly make the 4.0 odds against LEAVE available from those nice folk at Wm. Hill look like value
  • Danny565 said:

    Pretty safe to say now that Obama was not the "knockout blow" Remain were hoping for.

    Bottom line is Brits do not appreciate being treated as the USA's poodle and having their President come over here and tell us what to do (even if the President is as well-liked as Obama).
    ...and even less a traitorous pig dog PM inviting him over to harangue us and writing his scummy speech for him... FWIW I still think Remain will win, but the wailing and gnashing if it is a Leave result will keep me smiling for years to come.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    How many governments that have gone the full term have seen their share of the vote increase, since the war?

    Just so we can put that laughable 0.7% into context.
    Con+Lib Dem votes share in 2010 was: 59.1%
    in 2015 it was: 44.7%
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    weejonnie said:

    If REMAIN win (very likely), no matter if it is 50.5 - 49.5 it will be spun a la Hollande/ Sarkozy. "Massive Vote to Remain" - and the EU will say 'Thanks very much. Full steam ahead'.
    Full steam ahead with what?
  • tlg86 said:

    People starting to make up their minds?
    tlg86 said:

    People starting to make up their minds?
    I do not understand how on the today's ORB and ICM polls the DK are so small. I think there are many more undecideds than in these polls. Maybe someone who understands polling can explain it.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167

    HMRC are a bit rubbish too.

    A couple of years ago, they sent me a letter saying I didn't need to file in a tax return for the subsequent tax year (had to file one for the previous year, it was because of my time in Colorado in 2011), and to ignore any request they would send to file one - but they sent a request any way.

    If they knew I didn't have to file a return for the subsequent tax year, why did they bother to send a request???

    :open_mouth:
    Don't start me on HMRC.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    runnymede said:

    Exactly as predicted by the PB Groupthink Trust. Impressive.
    It's all over now... :lol:
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    runnymede said:

    Exactly as predicted by the PB Groupthink Trust. Impressive.
    Except my part of it, where I predicted a 2% bump for Remain.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753

    Ditto - great doorstep feedback
    100% Plato - I only wish Dixie posted more!!

    If UKIP are doing better than the polls on the doorstep, You have to reckon they may do even better in the ballot box, if there is a 'shy kipper' vote.

    Listen to Frank Field today. For him, the instinctive position of the labour voter is leave.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,098
    Alistair said:

    Con+Lib Dem votes share in 2010 was: 59.1%
    in 2015 it was: 44.7%
    The Gov't did indeed lose votes !

    Seeing as Corbyn is unelectable, I'm expecting the logical collorary to be a minority Tory Gov't in 2020 with the tacit support of the UUP, and the DUP on a confidence and supply basis.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Things are looking up even more for Leave:
    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/724970863133601792
  • Don't start me on HMRC.
    Oh go on - what did they ever do to you?
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753

    Full steam ahead with what?
    Ever closer integration.

    That's what it says on the tin.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    taffys said:

    Don't apologise these posts are great. Ties in with chestnut's post about 'shy working class kippers'.
    Seem to recall dimly that Greens did very well in the Mayoral last time.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    taffys said:

    Ever closer integration.

    That's what it says on the tin.
    That's fine. They probably need it, given the currency area. We wont be involved though as we are not in the Euro.
  • weejonnie said:

    >


    If REMAIN win (very likely), no matter if it is 50.5 - 49.5 it will be spun a la Hollande/ Sarkozy. "Massive Vote to Remain" - and the EU will say 'Thanks very much. Full steam ahead'.
    Not at all sure that is the case. If the UK returned to the EU with a substantial leave vote there is no way it will be business as usual.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    Patrick said:

    Oh go on - what did they ever do to you?
    Have you ever tried ringing them for advice? Or even better, the time I changed business address and the VAT people wrote back to say they can't change the address on their files due to the amount of fraud going on but they'll write back to me soon. I'm still waiting - it has been five years!
  • @AidanKerrPol: Uh huh? Lib Dem UK leader Tim Farron was campaigning in Scotland today but no one notified the media in advance? Strange one. #SP16
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Full steam ahead with what?
    Port Services Directive
    Increase in the EU Budget
    Harmonising Social Security

    These are already in the legislative process and were pulled from the vote until after the referendum. I can see Tory voters choking in their tea at the second and third, and the first is going to wreck our very profitable container ports. Still I am sure Dave knows best.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,098
    Patrick said:

    ...and even less a traitorous pig dog PM inviting him over to harangue us and writing his scummy speech for him... FWIW I still think Remain will win, but the wailing and gnashing if it is a Leave result will keep me smiling for years to come.
    I have noted a large spike in "concern" over the EU from alot of my 'remain' friends on Facebook.

    Although not directly analogous the situation reminds me of the hunting bill somewhat.

    Those who were concerned before the ban tended to be those against fox hunting, those in favour bringing up arguments about how it would waste parliamentary time and so forth.

    After the ban those in favour tended to be more concerned about it, and all the arguments previously used about wasting parliamentary time on it suddenly went out the window !

    People only ever "concerned/bothered" about something when its not going their way...
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,167
    MikeK said:

    Things are looking up even more for Leave:
    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/724970863133601792

    Not brilliant for Remain, but putting a nice, shiny spin on it, maybe a narrow poll lead for Leave will persuade Labour-Remainers that they will need to get off the sofa and actually vote.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,010

    Resuming hostilities it seems that the smugness exhibited by Remainers recently over Obama was premature, those gloating about holing HMS Anglosphere look a bit silly.

    I called for calm heads and I'm repeating it, Remain may have to rethink their strategy, I can't believe they have a better card to play than Obama but let's see.

    In immigration Leave have by far the best calling card of all. That's why I expect them to win.

  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Not at all sure that is the case. If the UK returned to the EU with a substantial leave vote there is no way it will be business as usual.
    The Dutch threw out the agreement with the Ukraine completely, but it's still going ahead in effect, just without the title at the top of the page - democracy EU style

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-eu-ukraine-idUSKCN0X70SJ
    "It may look as if we're ignoring the Dutch voters, but we have to keep our word to Ukraine, which has met the conditions," the source said.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,396
    edited April 2016
    Mr. Observer, fear trumps hope.

    Not only that, those who think they'll lose out or worry they might have a real thing now they fear losing. Those hoping for something better have an oasis in the desert. It might be real, or it might be an illusion.

    Inertia and the status quo are powerful factors, I think.

    Edited extra bit: Mr. Indigo, quite.

    Even if we vote to Leave, there's a significant chance we won't.

    But I still expect a circa 60/40 Remain win.
  • "Absolutely certain to vote" in the EU referendum, from latest ICM poll

    Voters identifying as Remain = 65%
    Voters identifying as Leave = 80%
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,509

    I do not understand how on the today's ORB and ICM polls the DK are so small. I think there are many more undecideds than in these polls. Maybe someone who understands polling can explain it.
    Neither do I. I'd have predicted any Obama backlash to have resulted in a rise in don't know, not a fall in it.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 18,163
    Dixie said:

    I feel guilty bringing up the 5th May elections, when all are talking about the referendum. Anyway, news on the streets of Wales and London is that UKIP will do better than polls. Might mean an extra seat or two in Wales and a London-wide Assembly member in London, at a stretch 2!

    Lib Dems are having a good campaign in terms of policies and organisations but no one trusts them! You may already know that.

    Labour say Khan is almost certain to be Mayor - '100%' is their view. mmm, let's hope not. Labour chaps say there is some gossip about him, not extremist led, that may leak!

    More Tories on the ground than Labour in London. Opposite of GE.

    Personally, it would be interesting to see who tops the mini-battle of Mayoral candidates between Greens (she's lovely), Lib Dems (automaton) and UKIP (surprising pleasant). I think UKIP might clinch it.

    Lastly, Galloway is bombing. Does he have any juice left in the tank? No one thinks so, but he is an unexploded bomb!

    Sorry, to bother you with all this.

    Isn't it quite difficult to end up with just one seat on the London Assembly? It's a narrow band from the 5% cut-off to the point where you'd win a second. Even more so if one or more of UKIP, Greens and Lib Dems miss out.
  • PAWPAW Posts: 1,074
    The thing that worries me about an European army that it could be used internally to support the EU. I have seen a few straws in the wind about troops, invited or uninvited, should be sent to Greece to force the Greeks to keep the immigrants there. And nothing at all on any external use. Would we be happy to see UK troops in the Ukraine to support the EU choice of government there, if the Ukranian people turned against him?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,098
    edited April 2016

    "Absolutely certain to vote" in the EU referendum, from latest ICM poll

    Voters identifying as Remain = 65%
    Voters identifying as Leave = 80%

    Could we be ... heading out after all ?

    What is the 10/10 on their phone poll
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,010

    Mr. Observer, fear trumps hope.

    Not only that, those who think they'll lose out or worry they might have a real thing now they fear losing. Those hoping for something better have an oasis in the desert. It might be real, or it might be an illusion.

    Inertia and the status quo are powerful factors, I think.

    Edited extra bit: Mr. Indigo, quite.

    Even if we vote to Leave, there's a significant chance we won't.

    But I still expect a circa 60/40 Remain win.

    Immigration is the ultimate fear card, isn't it? Immigrants are taking our jobs, pushing down our wages, claiming our generous benefits, making our housing more expensive, putting our public services under unbearable pressure and changing the cultural and social fabric of our country. It's an immensely powerful message and very hard to counter.

  • DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    Pulpstar said:

    Could we be ... heading out after all ?

    What is the 10/10 on their phone poll
    Bad news for Remain if a fantastic week for them has failed to change the fundamentals of this referendum.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    edited April 2016
    If Leave do win the referendum, or even come within 2% points in losing, my betting is that there will be a new GE within months of the result.

    I've put a pony on a quick GE by early 2017 @10/1
  • MikeK said:

    If Leave do win the referendum, or even come within 2% points in losing, my betting is that there will be a new GE within months of the result.

    I've put a pony on a quick GE by early 2017 @10/1

    MikeK said:

    If Leave do win the referendum, or even come within 2% points in losing, my betting is that there will be a new GE within months of the result.

    I've put a pony on a quick GE by early 2017 @10/1

    Why would the leavers put at risk their position to negotiate over the next four years their deal irrespective of whether David Cameron stays or retires
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,509

    Not at all sure that is the case. If the UK returned to the EU with a substantial leave vote there is no way it will be business as usual.
    Why wouldn't it be?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Indigo said:

    Port Services Directive
    Increase in the EU Budget
    Harmonising Social Security

    These are already in the legislative process and were pulled from the vote until after the referendum. I can see Tory voters choking in their tea at the second and third, and the first is going to wreck our very profitable container ports. Still I am sure Dave knows best.
    The first is not going to set the world alight as far as most people are concerned.
    Doesn't the UK have a veto on the second and third? Why would we not use our veto?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,396
    Mr. Eagles, that makes Goldsmith sound like an utter moron.

    First name?
    Not sure.
    You must have some idea.
    It might be Sod Off.
    What?
    Well, when I used to play in the gutter with the other snipes, I used to say "Hello, my name's Baldrick." And they'd say, "Yes, we know, Sod Off Baldrick."
  • MikeK said:

    If Leave do win the referendum, or even come within 2% points in losing, my betting is that there will be a new GE within months of the result.

    I've put a pony on a quick GE by early 2017 @10/1

    Why would the leavers put at risk their chance to negotiate a deal over the next four years
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,509

    The first is not going to set the world alight as far as most people are concerned.
    Doesn't the UK have a veto on the second and third? Why would we not use our veto?
    Like when we refused to pay, then halved the bill, then paid the whole bill?
  • Just before I go out canvassing, these are the numbers Leave need to change if they want to win

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/724959407134617600
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,396
    Mr. Observer, yes but I'd say firstly that fear of the unknown (losing what one has) trumps fear of the known (the unpleasant rubbish continuing), and that fear of losing trade/pensions/all that is wise and just and good, beats fear of more immigrants.

    It's a strong card for Leave, mind.
  • Why wouldn't it be?
    The EU is facing many crisis and democracy is one of them. The cry for democracy will echo throughout Europe over the next few years and change will happen, that is the main reason I believe UK should be at the table
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    Why would the leavers put at risk their chance to negotiate a deal over the next four years
    I wonder if Tory europhiles would try to force one and thus try to prevent the referendum result actually being executed. I wouldn't put it past them.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    In terms of the parliamentary cycle, that's fair enough. But in gains and losses - which is where the headline will be - 2012 is the right comparison. Also, using 2012 means you're comparing like-with-like in terms of *which* seats and councils were contested.
    Given that Labour gained over 800 seats in 2012, seeing 170 of them reversed would - in reality - be no big deal.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    In immigration Leave have by far the best calling card of all. That's why I expect them to win.

    I think you might be right, I'm not as fussed as some about immigration but there is undoubtedly growing concern among the WWC. At GE's they vote tribally in the main but they'll view this differently.

    I've said on here til I'm blue in the face they'll win it for Leave, the odds suggest I'm wrong but I'm increasingly confident.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,951
    edited April 2016
    runnymede said:

    I wonder if Tory europhiles would try to force one and thus try to prevent the referendum result actually being executed. I wouldn't put it past them.
    runnymede said:

    I wonder if Tory europhiles would try to force one and thus try to prevent the referendum result actually being executed. I wouldn't put it past them.
    No one, or even one party, can act against the democratic will of the British people. It is not going to happen
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183
    Last week felt to me like the week before the election that never was. Sion Simon levels of hubris by Remainiacs.

    On the street, Leave is committed and complacency won't help Remain.
  • DixieDixie Posts: 1,221
    None London Mayor has used their real name...Kenneth, Al and hopefully now, Frank.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183
    justin124 said:

    Given that Labour gained over 800 seats in 2012, seeing 170 of them reversed would - in reality - be no big deal.
    Such inspiring confidence in the Hard Left leadership!
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    MikeK said:

    If Leave do win the referendum, or even come within 2% points in losing, my betting is that there will be a new GE within months of the result.

    I've put a pony on a quick GE by early 2017 @10/1

    A general election if there's a leave vote is a terrible idea.

    On the Labour side if they win they don't want to leave so what's going to happen?
    On the Tory side enough want to leave that there's no way we won't leave if there's a leave vote so why have a GE?
  • Mortimer said:

    Such inspiring confidence in the Hard Left leadership!
    ICYMI :lol:

    https://twitter.com/StrongerIn/status/723505888670171137
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Like when we refused to pay, then halved the bill, then paid the whole bill?
    That was our bill we needed to pay based on the agreed payment mechanism. The second and third you mentioned have no inevitability and require a vote where we have a veto while the payment didn't.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,421

    "Absolutely certain to vote" in the EU referendum, from latest ICM poll

    Voters identifying as Remain = 65%
    Voters identifying as Leave = 80%

    Believe in BRITAIN!

    Be LEAVE!
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    The first is not going to set the world alight as far as most people are concerned.
    Doesn't the UK have a veto on the second and third? Why would we not use our veto?
    EU Budget and Social Security have been QMV since Lisbon. Meaning we would have to overturn them on the floor of the EU Parliament, good luck with that.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    Immigration is the ultimate fear card, isn't it? Immigrants are taking our jobs, pushing down our wages, claiming our generous benefits, making our housing more expensive, putting our public services under unbearable pressure and changing the cultural and social fabric of our country. It's an immensely powerful message and very hard to counter.

    This is a massive issue the Remain camp has, it would be easy for them to cry racist now, but before long they'll be asking those racists to vote for them in elections.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    justin124 said:

    Given that Labour gained over 800 seats in 2012, seeing 170 of them reversed would - in reality - be no big deal.
    Because 2012 was a precursor to a Labour victory in the next GE right? A real high point?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,421

    ICM Online

    Leave 46% (+2)
    Remain 44% (+1)
    Don't know 10% (-3)

    Fieldwork April 22-24

    Broken, sleazy Don't Knows on the slide?
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    Indigo said:

    Port Services Directive
    Increase in the EU Budget
    Harmonising Social Security

    These are already in the legislative process and were pulled from the vote until after the referendum. I can see Tory voters choking in their tea at the second and third, and the first is going to wreck our very profitable container ports. Still I am sure Dave knows best.
    The Government should refuse to implement the Port Services Directive if it unfairly impacts on the UK port industry. They won't though and we will see yet another industry negatively impacted by the EU.
  • DixieDixie Posts: 1,221

    Isn't it quite difficult to end up with just one seat on the London Assembly? It's a narrow band from the 5% cut-off to the point where you'd win a second. Even more so if one or more of UKIP, Greens and Lib Dems miss out.
    Yes, it is a good point. I've never worked it out, but it does seem to be the case. Things is that Greens/Libs/UKIP all may be at 7%. Will they all get 2 seats? I can't see it. Labour say they might lose seats!
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Why would the leavers put at risk their chance to negotiate a deal over the next four years
    We have been negotiating a deal for the last two years, did you notice the results, you might need a microscope.
  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @MikeK"


    'Things are looking up even more for Leave:
    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/724970863133601792'



    Hilarious,the first full week of the campaign and Remain has used almost everyone from the establishment to Obama & Leave goes up in the polls.You couldn't make it up.

    Mr Meeks will be along in a minute to tell us these polls were all paid for by the Leave campaign.

  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Indigo said:

    EU Budget and Social Security have been QMV since Lisbon. Meaning we would have to overturn them on the floor of the EU Parliament, good luck with that.
    "harmonisation in the field of social security and social protection" still requires unanimity.
  • DixieDixie Posts: 1,221
    taffys said:

    Don't apologise these posts are great. Ties in with chestnut's post about 'shy working class kippers'.
    Yes, I think social media has made us more conservative. If you say you are a Kipper, the world knows it, so people keep quiet. I do think, but don't want to say too much, that we Tories will do 2-4% better in London than opinion polls, perhaps more. In GE, we did 3% better and Labour 3% worse. I do see the same again.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    edited April 2016

    Because 2012 was a precursor to a Labour victory in the next GE right? A real high point?
    N0- that is a non sequitur. There is no direct relationship between local election results and the following General Election - eg Labour did badly at the 1960 and 1961 elections but still went on to win the 1964 General Election. On the other hand, Labour did well at the May 1970 local elections but then lost the General Election a month later!
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966


    twitter.com/StrongerIn/status/723505888670171137

    Shocker.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606074/Oxford-University-Loan-European-Union-European-Investment-Bank-Andrew-Taylor
    A BANK owned by the European Union has handed Oxford University a staggering £200million loan, casting doubt over its impartiality ahead of the referendum.
  • Indigo said:

    Shocker.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606074/Oxford-University-Loan-European-Union-European-Investment-Bank-Andrew-Taylor
    A BANK owned by the European Union has handed Oxford University a staggering £200million loan, casting doubt over its impartiality ahead of the referendum.
    Whoosh!
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183

    ICYMI :lol:

    https://twitter.com/StrongerIn/status/723505888670171137
    Who would have thought it, given their current Chancellor....
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966


    "harmonisation in the field of social security and social protection" still requires unanimity.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_the_Council_of_the_European_Union#Policy_areas
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183
    justin124 said:

    N0- that is a non sequitur. There is no direct relationship between local election results and the following General Election - eg Labour did badly at the 1960 and 1961 elections but still went on to win the 1964 General Election.
    ....when someone vaguely electable and acceptable led the Labour party.


  • Mortimer said:

    Who would have thought it, given their current Chancellor....
    Just had a look at the last four Chancellors Oxford has had, including the current incumbent.

    Three federalists and the appeaser, Lord Halifax.

    Puts the Cambridge spy ring to shame!
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,098
    edited April 2016
    SeanT said:

    HAHAHAHAHA

    I TOLD YOU NOT TO GLOAT, on April 22nd, the day Obama did his stupid thing:
    ~
    Voters don't like being bullied, and sometimes react the opposite way intended. Independence referendums are strange things."

    http://politicalbetting.vanillaforums.com/discussion/comment/1023863/#Comment_1023863

    Day 3 of the Obamadrama and the Leavers are still wailing like police sirens.

    The overreaction seems far more likely to be damaging to the Leave cause than Barack Obama's actual comments.

    Heh
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 40,010
    Indigo said:

    Shocker.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/606074/Oxford-University-Loan-European-Union-European-Investment-Bank-Andrew-Taylor
    A BANK owned by the European Union has handed Oxford University a staggering £200million loan, casting doubt over its impartiality ahead of the referendum.


    I am confused. Doesn't this show a significant benefit of EU membership. Our universities - among our greatest and most internationally=-renowned institutions - have been able to get long-term loans from the EIB at preferential rates. That's good, isn't it? And, as a result, it's not a great surprise that Oxford likes the EU. It's not claiming to be impartial, is it?

  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    SeanT said:

    Some more priceless quotes from the day Obama won it for REMAIN

    Roger Posts: 5,054
    April 22
    As celebrity endorsements go they don't get much better. An expert testimony as well

    bigjohnowls Posts: 6,205
    April 22
    Mike Smithson ‏@MSmithsonPB 27s28 seconds ago
    The big winner today Cameron. The big loser Boris

    Richard_Nabavi Posts: 10,443
    April 22
    I do love this argument that Cameron getting Obama to agree with him is demeaning to Cameron. Bravo!

    :lol:
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited April 2016


    I am confused. Doesn't this show a significant benefit of EU membership. Our universities - among our greatest and most internationally=-renowned institutions - have been able to get long-term loans from the EIB at preferential rates. That's good, isn't it? And, as a result, it's not a great surprise that Oxford likes the EU. It's not claiming to be impartial, is it?

    If you say so. The problem with loans is they can always ask for their money back if you aren't appropriately supportive, rather like an EU Pension.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,183

    Just had a look at the last four Chancellors Oxford has had, including the current incumbent.

    Three federalists and the appeaser, Lord Halifax.

    Puts the Cambridge spy ring to shame!
    You mean the TPD Cambridge spy ring?
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    SeanT said:

    Some more priceless quotes from the day Obama won it for REMAIN

    Roger Posts: 5,054
    April 22
    As celebrity endorsements go they don't get much better. An expert testimony as well

    bigjohnowls Posts: 6,205
    April 22
    Mike Smithson ‏@MSmithsonPB 27s28 seconds ago
    The big winner today Cameron. The big loser Boris

    Richard_Nabavi Posts: 10,443
    April 22
    I do love this argument that Cameron getting Obama to agree with him is demeaning to Cameron. Bravo!

    I think can think of a few other frequent posters who claimed that it was game over for Leave.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,098


    I am confused. Doesn't this show a significant benefit of EU membership. Our universities - among our greatest and most internationally=-renowned institutions - have been able to get long-term loans from the EIB at preferential rates. That's good, isn't it? And, as a result, it's not a great surprise that Oxford likes the EU. It's not claiming to be impartial, is it?

    I voted "Yes" our Unis should take EU cash on the poll, though I suspect many will be using it as a proxy poll for EURef ("Yes" on 29% in the voodoo poll).
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,509

    I am confused. Doesn't this show a significant benefit of EU membership. Our universities - among our greatest and most internationally=-renowned institutions - have been able to get long-term loans from the EIB at preferential rates. That's good, isn't it? And, as a result, it's not a great surprise that Oxford likes the EU. It's not claiming to be impartial, is it?



    Not claiming to be impartial is not the same as being upfront about a financial interest.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    Inexplicably, SeanT forgot to include this quote of mine. I wonder why?

    My point is that people telling an opinion pollster that they don't like Obama 'interfering' does not at all mean that his intervention hasn't had a dramatic effect in undermining the Leave case. There may even be a small move towards Leave in the opinion polls, as it's a cost-free way of being indignant.

    But no sentient being is seriously more likely to vote Leave as a result of being miffed, are they? Whereas a number of sentient beings will appreciate that it rather blows a hole in Leave's case.

    http://politicalbetting.vanillaforums.com/discussion/comment/1027363/#Comment_1027363
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    I am confused. Doesn't this show a significant benefit of EU membership. Our universities - among our greatest and most internationally=-renowned institutions - have been able to get long-term loans from the EIB at preferential rates. That's good, isn't it? And, as a result, it's not a great surprise that Oxford likes the EU. It's not claiming to be impartial, is it?



    If we didn't give £1.7bn to the EU last year we could have given some of it to Oxford, no need for a loan
This discussion has been closed.