Just 13 of the 31 local seats in Hartlepool on Westminster by-election day have Tory contenders – politicalbetting.com
As we all know the Hartlepool Westminster by-election is taking place on May 6th – the same day as the locals throughout England and the Scottish and Welsh Parliament elections.
Mind you back in 2015 the Tories took a few seats from the Lib Dems where the Tories had minimal councillors, let alone council candidates.
I think Eastleigh was the most famous where at the run up to GE 2015 the Lib Dems held 40 out of the 44 council seats in Eastleigh, the blue meanies held the other four.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
All the wards have 3 seats in them and the Tories have 1 candidate in all wards except for Throston (no candidate) and Rural West (3 candidates)
So there is a Tory candidate (albeit only 1) in all wards they have a chance of winning and 3 in the ward they are likely to win all the seats and don't have independents.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Clearly an idiot. We are in Phase 4 of clinical testing - where the very rare side effects come out. If you have 10,000 in your trial and a 1 in 100,000 side effect, you'd never know from the Phase III trial. It seems likely that there are treatments/interventions for the rare side effect so that even fewer will die from blood clots.
We have also undoubtedly saved many more lives than have sadly been lost from the vaccine. As ever though. you cannot ever show who has been saved, only the dead are known.
I'm very happy with my bet at evens on the Tories to win Hartlepool. It's much shorter now but I'm not laying back. The party of Brexit are quite rightly the clear betting favourites to win this most Brexity of seats. I'll also be delighted if I'm wrong and Labour pull off the upset since this will mean the Tory hold on the WWC Leave political identity is starting to fade already - despite a Brexit so recent in the memory and looking very good because of vaccines - which will bode well for Labour's longer term prospects at GE24. So it's a win/win as far as I'm concerned. Course by the same token it's also a lose/lose.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Been too busy with work lately to spend any time on PB but just wanted to come on and pay my respects to Baroness Shirley Williams.
As with many politicians I did not agree with many of the things she believed in and promoted but she was of a generation which saw politics as a a matter of public service and undoubtedly worked for the public good. After Mrs Thatcher she was, to my mind, the most powerful female politician of post war Britain and outshone most of her male contemporaries. A powerful speaker, a fearsome intellect and someone who you always felt was working to make life better for people.
As I said I may have disagreed with many of her political positions but that does not mean she did not have the good of the country and the people at heart.
I'm very happy with my bet at evens on the Tories to win Hartlepool. It's much shorter now but I'm not laying back. The party of Brexit are quite rightly the clear betting favourites to win this most Brexity of seats. I'll also be delighted if I'm wrong and Labour pull off the upset since this will mean the Tory hold on the WWC Leave political identity is starting to fade already - despite a Brexit so recent in the memory and looking very good because of vaccines - which will bode well for Labour's longer term prospects at GE24. So it's a win/win as far as I'm concerned. Course by the same token it's also a lose/lose.
Good bit of expectations management there. Seat the tories have never had and didnt get in the brexit landslide of 2019, if they still dont get it in this by election shows quite clearly that theyve lost the hold on the WWC.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
When Britain voted for Brexit Juncker didn't resign.
No disaster is so profound as to require an EU resignation.
As has been amply demonstrated.
Bit of a difference though.
I'm sure the EU would have been happier had the UK stayed in, but it's not a fundamental part of their existence. The reason they didn't offer Dave C more was that they're not that into us... Which is their (sovereign) decision.
Maintenance of the United Kingdom is a fundamental point of the Conservative and Unionist Party. For Scotland to leave the UK in the Conservative's watch would be a resigning matter.
Not really.
Quite frankly Scottish independence has been decades in the making. When it happens, it happens, its their choice.
The Tories will take it in their stride and adapt, seeking to turn it to their advantage. Its what the party does.
It might do but it would still get rid of Boris first so he takes the blame for allowing a legal indyref2 and then losing it
Telling the Scots that the clown would resign if they get indy might not be wise? Best keep it from your Epping militiamen, for the time being, eh?
If he resigns or not he would be forced out by Tory MPs if he allowed a legal indyref2 and then lost Scotland, that would be inevitable
Yes, but your militia may not share your incisive grasp of the political inevitabilities
It does not matter, Tory backbenchers alone would be enough to topple him and they would if he lost Scotland
Except, Tory backbenchers would have voted for the process that got us to that point....
I think Tory backbenchers will be far more concerned with how to ensure they keep their seat at the next election.
If Scotland votes Yes and the PM can twist that to say that he will need to stand up for England, Wales and Northern Ireland in the future negotiations with Scotland (like the EU27 acted) then that could play into the Tories interests. Especially if Labour are seen as being weak and only able to get in power with Scotland's help, who can trust them to negotiate with the Scots in our interests?
It will be entirely possible for a Tory PM to turn Scotland voting for independence in a reason to vote Tory and if the backbenchers think that saves their seats they will go for it.
The Tories would likely win an English majority either way, Starmer could only become UK PM with SNP and Welsh Labour MPs support most likely so it would make little difference to their seats.
They would also want Boris to take the blame for losing Scotland, they could then rebuild under Sunak who also is more serious and hard headed than Boris and better able to get one over the SNP in any Scexit talks
It's this kind of "taking votes for granted" that got Labour into trouble.
The only Labour leader who has won a majority in England to take Labour into power since Attlee in 1945 was Blair in 1997.
Wilson in 1964 and February 1974 only got in thanks to the majority of Labour MPs in Scotland and Wales, Home and Heath won a Tory majority in England.
In 1950 even Attlee failed to keep his English majority, again being re elected only thanks to Scottish and Welsh Labour MPs, Blair is the only Labour leader ever to have won a majority and been re elected with a majority in England.
So absent a Blairite Labour leader just a statement of the obvious
And the only Conservative Leader to win Sedgefield since 1945 was... Boris Johnson.
Things change. You can't take votes for granted.
Boris Johnson won a majority in England as has every winning Tory PM since 1945.
Labour has only won a majority in England in 5 out of the 9 elections it has won since 1945 and 3 of those were under Blair.
The Tories are not going to start doing better in Wales and Scotland than they do in England.
Sedgefield has always been cultually conservative and proud of its country, even if economically less conservative, we now have a culturally conservative, relatively nationalist Tory government that is centrist economically, so it was more the Tory Party that has changed than Sedgefield and Sedgefield now feels it is a Tory Party worth supporting
Exactly.
Labour won Sedgefield at every election since 1945... until they didn't.
the Conservatives have won England in most election since 1945... except for all the times they didn't.
You can't take votes for granted. That's the mistake Labour made.
If the Conservatives focus too much on the 'red wall' and take their "heartlands" for granted they might just see the same thing happen to them.
Thanks for confirming that at every election they won across the UK the Tories won a majority in England.
The Tories have never won more seats in Scotland and Wales as a percentage than they won in England, even if they have lost England they have lost Scotland and Wales by even more.
So my point remains absolutely right, Starmer can get into power by winning in Scotland and Wales but not in England, he has zero change of winning in England without also winning in Scotland and Wales and would need a 1997 style landslide to win in England in 2024
You’re making the SNP’s case for it by talking about the constituent nations as separate, and gleefully celebrating the success of a largely English party in running the other nations.
Wrong.
The opposite, in 1950 and 1964 and February 1964 Labour won a UK majority thanks to Scottish and Welsh Labour MPs despite the Tory majority in England. On current polling the likeliest way Starmer becomes PM in 2024 is a repeat, the Tories win a majority in England while Starmer becomes UK PM thanks to SNP and Welsh Labour MPs.
So Starmer would in effect be the SNP's puppet UK PM despite a Tory majority in England and no English Parliament now unlike the Scottish and Welsh Parliaments with the current UK Tory majority.
The constituent nations have been separate ever since Blair introduced devolution.
Either we scrap Holyrood and the Senedd and restore direct rule from Westminster so we can talk about the UK as one true union again or we introduce an English parliament or regional assemblies alongside those in the other home nations and have a truly Federal UK
I don’t think you understood my point because you’ve done it again. Calling Starmer in such circumstances a puppet suggests you don’t want the same Union I loved. You want an English empire - which is the SNP’s point made for them.
There is no Union as was and has not been since 1999. That is the whole point, we now have a Federal UK for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland which have their own Parliaments and Assemblies for their domestic policy but not for England which does not have a Parliament of its own.
So either we restore a genuine Union by scrapping Holyrood and the Senedd or we have a genuine Federal UK for the whole UK and create an English Parliament with the same powers Holyrood and the Senedd have (or at least English regional assemblies) and just leave Westminster as the Federal UK Parliament.
English equality with Scotland within the UK is not demanding an English Empire, that would require scrapping Holyrood and the Senedd and removing Scottish and Welsh MPs and peers from Westminster too
This is quite correct.
The issue is option 1 is unacceptable to Scotland, Northern Ireland and I would think Wales as well, while option 2 is a difficult one to work out between regional assemblies/metro mayors/English Parliament that would be five times the size and mass of the other three combined.
Of course, you could argue this was the situation from 1922 to 1973 with Stormont, but as Northern Ireland was effectively a dominion (albeit one that sent MPs to Westminster) with far wider powers than Holyrood currently has, that isn’t the best of arguments.
I don't really see the issue with the 'size' of the English Parliament. It would be bigger because it would have a bigger job - it wouldn't be 'weightier' or more important, or constantly bullying the 'small' parliaments of the other nations, because there wouldn't be a forum for it do so. I wouldn't see a case for regional assemblies alongside it, because of cost and duplication.
I think the issue (and this may be what ydoethur is saying) is not that the regional parliaments are of different sizes, but how that is squared at the federal level. Do you have a Westminster with similar allocations to now (population based) in which case the England UK MPs can easily outvote MPs from other nations - i.e. they could pork barrel UK spending/siting of infrastructure for England? Or do you have each nation with an equal weight in the UK parliament, in which case the smaller nations, with a tiny part of the overall population, could dictate the UK's direction?
It's not easy, but if the UK is to survive then I think we need to work out the answer. It might be an upper/lower house combo with one population weighted and the other at least more equal say for each nation.
Edit: And if we can't adequately resolve this question, then it's probably an indication that the UK should not survive as a single entity.
I'd envisage still having WM as the UK Parliament. The issue you mention with England having more representatives there would not be any more severe than they are now.
Been too busy with work lately to spend any time on PB but just wanted to come on and pay my respects to Baroness Shirley Williams.
As with many politicians I did not agree with many of the things she believed in and promoted but she was of a generation which saw politics as a a matter of public service and undoubtedly worked for the public good. After Mrs Thatcher she was, to my mind, the most powerful female politician of post war Britain and outshone most of her male contemporaries. A powerful speaker, a fearsome intellect and someone who you always felt was working to make life better for people.
As I said I may have disagreed with many of her political positions but that does not mean she did not have the good of the country and the people at heart.
A good age but still a sad loss.
RIP
It is worth remembering that Ms Williams was still performing for the LibDems on TV as recently as the 2017 General Election.
One thing worth noting, in the past the NHS nationwide booking site gets a sneaky backend database update a few days before they make the announcement, opening up to the next group that they are going to announce.
It wouldn't surprise me if you are late 40s and you go on there now if you can't book.
Tories need Brexit voters to (a) turn out and (b) vote for them.
If they can do that, they’re laughing.
If not, Labour will hold.
It really is that easy.
Yep. GOTV is crucial in this one. I am on Labour on BF.
My instinct is shouting Labour too. I don’t see the Tories managing both of those things.
If they do - and do so in Wales as well - Labour are in deep, deep shit.
Outside Hartlepool and North Wales, the places to watch are the Monmouthshire seats - both seats in Newport, and Torfaen. If the Brexit voters switch en bloc there, Labour are in massive trouble.
One thing worth noting, in the past the NHS nationwide booking site gets a sneaky backend database update a few days before they make the announcement, opening up to the next group that they are going to announce.
It wouldn't surprise me if you are late 40s and you go on there now if you can't book.
I've just tried,(I'm definitely in the next group to be done) and it's still a No from the website.
Will try again tomorrow as it won't be long away if they are talking about it.
How many independents are standing who could loosely be conservatives
Could be.
I counted seven Reform and goodness knows how many 'Veteran and People's Party....??
Local knowledge essential! Two big factors in small town/rural areas; the Independents who are basically Tories/centre right; and the degree to which the vote is not party but personal. (I vote Labour in some local elections, and anyone but the Tory in another but this is 100% about people not party and is no guide at all to general elections!)
A blog post alleging that the SNP has channelled public funding to voluntary groups that advocate lowering the age of consent to 10 has provoked controversy on social media.
The post on the Wings Over Scotland blog amplified comments attributed to Alba Party candidate for Central Scotland, Margaret Lynch.
A tweet on Saturday 10 April by another party supporter claimed Lynch had argued in an online party forum for women that LGBT+ groups in Scotland were lobbying to reduce the age of consent to 10.
Although the tweet was subsequently deleted, screen grabs of it continued to be shared online and Lynch has subsequently re-shared other tweets making similar arguments from her Twitter account.
The author of the Wings Over Scotland blog developed the claims further. In a post he described a document said to provide evidence for the claims as a ‘paedophile charter,’ and concluded the SNP are “paying lobby groups with your money to try to reduce the age of consent in Scotland to 10”.
This blog post was subsequently shared on Twitter by Alba Party MP and Scottish Parliamentary candidate, Neale Hanvey. It was also shared repeatedly on Twitter, and in a number of Facebook groups.
Ferret Fact Service looked at this claim and rated it FFS.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
A blog post alleging that the SNP has channelled public funding to voluntary groups that advocate lowering the age of consent to 10 has provoked controversy on social media.
The post on the Wings Over Scotland blog amplified comments attributed to Alba Party candidate for Central Scotland, Margaret Lynch.
A tweet on Saturday 10 April by another party supporter claimed Lynch had argued in an online party forum for women that LGBT+ groups in Scotland were lobbying to reduce the age of consent to 10.
Although the tweet was subsequently deleted, screen grabs of it continued to be shared online and Lynch has subsequently re-shared other tweets making similar arguments from her Twitter account.
The author of the Wings Over Scotland blog developed the claims further. In a post he described a document said to provide evidence for the claims as a ‘paedophile charter,’ and concluded the SNP are “paying lobby groups with your money to try to reduce the age of consent in Scotland to 10”.
This blog post was subsequently shared on Twitter by Alba Party MP and Scottish Parliamentary candidate, Neale Hanvey. It was also shared repeatedly on Twitter, and in a number of Facebook groups.
Ferret Fact Service looked at this claim and rated it FFS.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
I'm screwed if being condescending, offensive, and focussing on language are seen as being problematic by the judiciary and others.
A litigant-in-person has been hit with a bill of almost £100,000 in costs, after the court slammed him for being "difficult to deal with, condescending" and "offensive".
Sir Henry Royce Memorial, a charitable foundation, brought a claim in the High Court for costs on an indemnity basis against former finance director Mark Hardy. The claim followed a previous trial where Hardy had accused Sir Henry Royce Memorial and its directors of fraud and false accounting.
Hardy's accusations of wrongdoing by the directors were unproven. And the court ruled that his request for inspection of documents under the Companies Act was invalid, and not made for a proper purpose.
Judge Paul Matthews ruled that Hardy had a "rather condescending manner" and exhibited "unnecessary" behaviour when dealing with the other side, which resulted in "more time and resources" being spent on the "problems of tone and language than in addressing the real issues in the case."
The judge said the matter did not require "such disproportionate efforts" from Hardy, and highlighted his "excessive correspondence", which ran to two lever arch files for the trial bundle. Hardy had also exhibited a 500 page transcript of a particular meeting, which the judge noted was not "more than remotely relevant to the issues in the case".
Hardy had "vigorously" insisted that a remote trial of his claim should be live streamed on the internet because there would be a great public interest with "possibly hundreds of requests to join". However, no more than 14 members of the public requested the link.
The judge said Hardy should not be excused for his behaviour just because he was a litigant-in-person. The problem was that Hardy had "no sense of responsibility to the system" and "no duty of the kind that would be owed by a lawyer to the court," said the judge.
The claimant sought to recover costs estimated at around £163,000 on an indemnity basis. The judge said the size of the costs was "significant" and while they may be justified, "are somewhat larger than I would have expected for what is essentially a short point under the Companies Act."
The judge ordered Hardy to pay 60% of the costs upfront, with the remainder going for detailed assessment.
Sad to hear of the passing of Shirley Williams. Difficult to think of her as being 90 years old in that it seems no time at all since she was being talked about as one of 'the bright up and coming MPs to look out for.'. I have also just been informed that my own former MP for Norwich North - Ian Gibson - has died at 82.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
I'm screwed if being condescending, offensive, and focussing on language are seen as being problematic by the judiciary and others.
A litigant-in-person has been hit with a bill of almost £100,000 in costs, after the court slammed him for being "difficult to deal with, condescending" and "offensive".
Sir Henry Royce Memorial, a charitable foundation, brought a claim in the High Court for costs on an indemnity basis against former finance director Mark Hardy. The claim followed a previous trial where Hardy had accused Sir Henry Royce Memorial and its directors of fraud and false accounting.
Hardy's accusations of wrongdoing by the directors were unproven. And the court ruled that his request for inspection of documents under the Companies Act was invalid, and not made for a proper purpose.
Judge Paul Matthews ruled that Hardy had a "rather condescending manner" and exhibited "unnecessary" behaviour when dealing with the other side, which resulted in "more time and resources" being spent on the "problems of tone and language than in addressing the real issues in the case."
The judge said the matter did not require "such disproportionate efforts" from Hardy, and highlighted his "excessive correspondence", which ran to two lever arch files for the trial bundle. Hardy had also exhibited a 500 page transcript of a particular meeting, which the judge noted was not "more than remotely relevant to the issues in the case".
Hardy had "vigorously" insisted that a remote trial of his claim should be live streamed on the internet because there would be a great public interest with "possibly hundreds of requests to join". However, no more than 14 members of the public requested the link.
The judge said Hardy should not be excused for his behaviour just because he was a litigant-in-person. The problem was that Hardy had "no sense of responsibility to the system" and "no duty of the kind that would be owed by a lawyer to the court," said the judge.
The claimant sought to recover costs estimated at around £163,000 on an indemnity basis. The judge said the size of the costs was "significant" and while they may be justified, "are somewhat larger than I would have expected for what is essentially a short point under the Companies Act."
The judge ordered Hardy to pay 60% of the costs upfront, with the remainder going for detailed assessment.
I have known many, many occasions where someone is truculent and difficult, through some wrongheaded notion of being thorough and officious, and cause things to be investigated which otherwise probably would not be, or caused far more work, time or cost than they wanted (and usually complained about), so that sort of story does not surprise me in the slightest.
It's hard to know where to draw the line, but some people intentionally or not take the piss when they play barrack room lawyer out of a misplaced sense of thoroughness, and a hyper focus on tone and language, and arguing over trivial matters, is a common sign of it.
Back from pub lunch. Sunny but bloody freezing but had to be done.
Very busy, no-one wearing masks except staff. Prices hiked a fair bit but I don't begrudge that given the torrid time hospitality has had. I reckon they have done 250-300 covers over lunch time (it's a big pub) and if average £25 a head that's approx £7k takings.
Been too busy with work lately to spend any time on PB but just wanted to come on and pay my respects to Baroness Shirley Williams.
As with many politicians I did not agree with many of the things she believed in and promoted but she was of a generation which saw politics as a a matter of public service and undoubtedly worked for the public good. After Mrs Thatcher she was, to my mind, the most powerful female politician of post war Britain and outshone most of her male contemporaries. A powerful speaker, a fearsome intellect and someone who you always felt was working to make life better for people.
As I said I may have disagreed with many of her political positions but that does not mean she did not have the good of the country and the people at heart.
A good age but still a sad loss.
RIP
A truly gracious tribute. Oddly, not very far from in some respects from her own tribute to Thatcher.
How many independents are standing who could loosely be conservatives
Could be.
I counted seven Reform and goodness knows how many 'Veteran and People's Party....??
Local knowledge essential! Two big factors in small town/rural areas; the Independents who are basically Tories/centre right; and the degree to which the vote is not party but personal. (I vote Labour in some local elections, and anyone but the Tory in another but this is 100% about people not party and is no guide at all to general elections!)
The current leadership is made up of Independent union, Conservatives + Vetrans with Independents supporting them
Burn Valley - 2 independents standing again De Bruce - Labour Fens - 2 Independent Union both standing again Foggy - was socialist labour so probably Labour Hart - Independent is standing down - Tory won the the seat last time round Headland - the 3 Hartlepool Independent Candidates will win again (they are all mad around there) Manor House - was Socialist Labour so probably Labour Rural West - 3 Tories all standing again Seaton - It will be the 2 independents that won last time Throston (was Jesmond) was 1 Hartlepool people, 1 labour, 1 reform UK - not a clue Victoria - 3 seats were Labour will be again
So yes are a lot of independent candidates who are really Tory
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
I suspect lateral flow tests for school kids coming back into the system (you can check the make up of the different type of tests if you restrict to England under cases). Also substantially less that two weeks ago, so Easter effect will be there last monday.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
It also says there will be an impact due to the Employment tribunal result and there are other tax issues in the UK (which is the VAT case we talked about on Friday).
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
I suspect lateral flow tests for school kids coming back into the system (you can check the make up of the different type of tests if you restrict to England under cases). Also substantially less that two weeks ago, so Easter effect will be there last monday.
Been too busy with work lately to spend any time on PB but just wanted to come on and pay my respects to Baroness Shirley Williams.
As with many politicians I did not agree with many of the things she believed in and promoted but she was of a generation which saw politics as a a matter of public service and undoubtedly worked for the public good. After Mrs Thatcher she was, to my mind, the most powerful female politician of post war Britain and outshone most of her male contemporaries. A powerful speaker, a fearsome intellect and someone who you always felt was working to make life better for people.
As I said I may have disagreed with many of her political positions but that does not mean she did not have the good of the country and the people at heart.
A good age but still a sad loss.
RIP
A truly gracious tribute. Oddly, not very far from in some respects from her own tribute to Thatcher.
"President Mitterrand used to bring her flowers when they met. In private, he admitted to his friends that he found her very attractive. She had, he said, the eyes of Caligula, but the mouth of Marilyn Monroe."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Now deleted. Never trust a man who cant spell Wetherspoons though.
I always wonder what people's problems with Wetherspoons is. I guess its more about the type of people who use them.
Large corporate pushing out small independent firms while engaging in aggressive tax measures to keep costs low. They're the Amazon of the pub space.
That seem a bit esoteric as far as man in the street complaints go.
But I think a lot of the public don't think rationally about pubs anyway, given the sorts of reactions to closures and conversions of pubs which people simply are not going to enough to keep open.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
Catholic schools will be back this week as they usually have the week before and after Easter off. https://www.hcpt.org.uk head to Lourdes for the week after Easter so a lot of schools organise their school year around that week.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Now deleted. Never trust a man who cant spell Wetherspoons though.
I always wonder what people's problems with Wetherspoons is. I guess its more about the type of people who use them.
Large corporate pushing out small independent firms while engaging in aggressive tax measures to keep costs low. They're the Amazon of the pub space.
You really think that? I would describe them more of the lidl/aldi of the pub trade. Cheap and cheerful, staff paid and treated no worse than your gastro pub with a bill 3x the size. A pint and lunch for less than a £5.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Now deleted. Never trust a man who cant spell Wetherspoons though.
I always wonder what people's problems with Wetherspoons is. I guess its more about the type of people who use them.
They are shit pubs.
Possibly the McDonalds effect - generic pub, all the same no matter where in the country you are. Just as a McDonalds can hit the spot when hungry and needing quick food, so a Wetherspoons can suffice for a quick pint, but for a meal out or a decent drinking experience there are better choices...
How many independents are standing who could loosely be conservatives
Could be.
I counted seven Reform and goodness knows how many 'Veteran and People's Party....??
Local knowledge essential! Two big factors in small town/rural areas; the Independents who are basically Tories/centre right; and the degree to which the vote is not party but personal. (I vote Labour in some local elections, and anyone but the Tory in another but this is 100% about people not party and is no guide at all to general elections!)
The current leadership is made up of Independent union, Conservatives + Vetrans with Independents supporting them
Burn Valley - 2 independents standing again De Bruce - Labour Fens - 2 Independent Union both standing again Foggy - was socialist labour so probably Labour Hart - Independent is standing down - Tory won the the seat last time round Headland - the 3 Hartlepool Independent Candidates will win again (they are all mad around there) Manor House - was Socialist Labour so probably Labour Rural West - 3 Tories all standing again Seaton - It will be the 2 independents that won last time Throston (was Jesmond) was 1 Hartlepool people, 1 labour, 1 reform UK - not a clue Victoria - 3 seats were Labour will be again
So yes are a lot of independent candidates who are really Tory
I love Headland - if only for the rare birds that turn up there. And the unfailingly polite locals.
Hartlepool was always a place to fill up the car for the return journey - for some unknown reason, it had the cheapest petrol in the country.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
Not everywhere. Some are back I think.
Yes, my children are going through another stack of lateral flow tests. For returning to school later....
How many independents are standing who could loosely be conservatives
Could be.
I counted seven Reform and goodness knows how many 'Veteran and People's Party....??
Local knowledge essential! Two big factors in small town/rural areas; the Independents who are basically Tories/centre right; and the degree to which the vote is not party but personal. (I vote Labour in some local elections, and anyone but the Tory in another but this is 100% about people not party and is no guide at all to general elections!)
The current leadership is made up of Independent union, Conservatives + Vetrans with Independents supporting them
Burn Valley - 2 independents standing again De Bruce - Labour Fens - 2 Independent Union both standing again Foggy - was socialist labour so probably Labour Hart - Independent is standing down - Tory won the the seat last time round Headland - the 3 Hartlepool Independent Candidates will win again (they are all mad around there) Manor House - was Socialist Labour so probably Labour Rural West - 3 Tories all standing again Seaton - It will be the 2 independents that won last time Throston (was Jesmond) was 1 Hartlepool people, 1 labour, 1 reform UK - not a clue Victoria - 3 seats were Labour will be again
So yes are a lot of independent candidates who are really Tory
I love Headland - if only for the rare birds that turn up there. And the unfailingly polite locals.
Hartlepool was always a place to fill up the car for the return journey - for some unknown reason, it had the cheapest petrol in the country.
I like Headland it just takes a very long time to get there - even after you've battled through Hartlepool its still another 10 minutes drive.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Now deleted. Never trust a man who cant spell Wetherspoons though.
I always wonder what people's problems with Wetherspoons is. I guess its more about the type of people who use them.
Large corporate pushing out small independent firms while engaging in aggressive tax measures to keep costs low. They're the Amazon of the pub space.
On the flipside they're also affordable for a lot of people and bring custom back to high streets. The problem isn't with Wetherspoons it's with other large breweries charging ridiculous rent and not allowing pubs to choose their own beer or prices.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Ok, I have been jabbed. It was the Pfizer one that was being handed out today. Obviously not as clever as the Oxford vaccine but I am sure that it will do the job. 21 days until I am relatively safe.
One possible side effect of proximity to the vaccine seemed to be a tendency to move in slow motion. Some of the NHS staff seemed particularly badly affected. Something to look out for.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
I suspect lateral flow tests for school kids coming back into the system (you can check the make up of the different type of tests if you restrict to England under cases). Also substantially less that two weeks ago, so Easter effect will be there last monday.
They were meant to keep testing all the way through the holidays, although I doubt if many bothered.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
The sub-pages for cases and deaths seem to have updated separately, even though the main update page hasn't. Apparently 3,568 cases (seems a lot higher than recent numbers) and 13 deaths.
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
See my post - lateral flow tests for kids coming back to school. PCR confirmed is still very low.
The children are still off school though? Unless some places have different holidays maybe?
Not everywhere. Some are back I think.
State schools round here all started today.
Depends on the county. Lancs I think went back today. Staffs broke up a week later, we go back next Monday. Although I have spent all afternoon marking.
"@MichaelMDowling As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
I'm screwed if being condescending, offensive, and focussing on language are seen as being problematic by the judiciary and others.
A litigant-in-person has been hit with a bill of almost £100,000 in costs, after the court slammed him for being "difficult to deal with, condescending" and "offensive".
Sir Henry Royce Memorial, a charitable foundation, brought a claim in the High Court for costs on an indemnity basis against former finance director Mark Hardy. The claim followed a previous trial where Hardy had accused Sir Henry Royce Memorial and its directors of fraud and false accounting.
Hardy's accusations of wrongdoing by the directors were unproven. And the court ruled that his request for inspection of documents under the Companies Act was invalid, and not made for a proper purpose.
Judge Paul Matthews ruled that Hardy had a "rather condescending manner" and exhibited "unnecessary" behaviour when dealing with the other side, which resulted in "more time and resources" being spent on the "problems of tone and language than in addressing the real issues in the case."
The judge said the matter did not require "such disproportionate efforts" from Hardy, and highlighted his "excessive correspondence", which ran to two lever arch files for the trial bundle. Hardy had also exhibited a 500 page transcript of a particular meeting, which the judge noted was not "more than remotely relevant to the issues in the case".
Hardy had "vigorously" insisted that a remote trial of his claim should be live streamed on the internet because there would be a great public interest with "possibly hundreds of requests to join". However, no more than 14 members of the public requested the link.
The judge said Hardy should not be excused for his behaviour just because he was a litigant-in-person. The problem was that Hardy had "no sense of responsibility to the system" and "no duty of the kind that would be owed by a lawyer to the court," said the judge.
The claimant sought to recover costs estimated at around £163,000 on an indemnity basis. The judge said the size of the costs was "significant" and while they may be justified, "are somewhat larger than I would have expected for what is essentially a short point under the Companies Act."
The judge ordered Hardy to pay 60% of the costs upfront, with the remainder going for detailed assessment.
SFAICS the bloke lost the case; costs follow the event so he was liable for costs anyway. Judges are entitled to form views about how people (LIPs and lawyers) have conducted themselves. See for example R vFarooqi for a fascinating judgement in the Court of Appeal arising from this
Ok, I have been jabbed. It was the Pfizer one that was being handed out today. Obviously not as clever as the Oxford vaccine but I am sure that it will do the job. 21 days until I am relatively safe.
One possible side effect of proximity to the vaccine seemed to be a tendency to move in slow motion. Some of the NHS staff seemed particularly badly affected. Something to look out for.
If Chow Yun Fat walks by, be worried. If some white doves start flying in slow motion..... Pray. Just pray....
Comments
However with a lack of ground game an issue during the plague impacting all parties this might not be so damaging to the Tories.
I think Eastleigh was the most famous where at the run up to GE 2015 the Lib Dems held 40 out of the 44 council seats in Eastleigh, the blue meanies held the other four.
I think this is the full list of candidates. Make of it what you will. So far as I can see the monkey is not standing.
"@MichaelMDowling
As English pubs open today, we should recognise they achieved this by risking the health of their population by vaccinating too early with vaccines they didn't understand.
The EU approach is testing new medicine is vastly superior to the early chance to pop into Weatherspoons."
https://twitter.com/MichaelMDowling/status/1381596226639036417
Tories need Brexit voters to (a) turn out and (b) vote for them.
If they can do that, they’re laughing.
If not, Labour will hold.
It really is that easy.
All the wards have 3 seats in them and the Tories have 1 candidate in all wards except for Throston (no candidate) and Rural West (3 candidates)
So there is a Tory candidate (albeit only 1) in all wards they have a chance of winning and 3 in the ward they are likely to win all the seats and don't have independents.
That does seem a very low number of Conservatives, even assuming some number of pretty conservative Independents or local parties.
What do you think @Scott_P
We have also undoubtedly saved many more lives than have sadly been lost from the vaccine. As ever though. you cannot ever show who has been saved, only the dead are known.
I counted seven Reform and goodness knows how many 'Veteran and People's Party....??
Sad to see the passing of Baroness Shirley Williams. Someone for whom I would ditch the BBC schedules to celebrate her life.
Maybe he engaged his brain after opening his Twitter feed?
As with many politicians I did not agree with many of the things she believed in and promoted but she was of a generation which saw politics as a a matter of public service and undoubtedly worked for the public good. After Mrs Thatcher she was, to my mind, the most powerful female politician of post war Britain and outshone most of her male contemporaries. A powerful speaker, a fearsome intellect and someone who you always felt was working to make life better for people.
As I said I may have disagreed with many of her political positions but that does not mean she did not have the good of the country and the people at heart.
A good age but still a sad loss.
RIP
??
What a load of rubbish - as it seems he has deleted the tweet I think he realises how stupid he looks by posting such crap
It looks like vaccines will be opened to 45+ very shortly (unless they do it in smaller age bands).
https://twitter.com/HugoGye/status/1381627929331953664
https://twitter.com/HugoGye/status/1381629685281488908?s=20
It wouldn't surprise me if you are late 40s and you go on there now if you can't book.
If they do - and do so in Wales as well - Labour are in deep, deep shit.
Outside Hartlepool and North Wales, the places to watch are the Monmouthshire seats - both seats in Newport, and Torfaen. If the Brexit voters switch en bloc there, Labour are in massive trouble.
The specimen date numbers don't look too bad but it seems odd nonethless.
Will try again tomorrow as it won't be long away if they are talking about it.
A blog post alleging that the SNP has channelled public funding to voluntary groups that advocate lowering the age of consent to 10 has provoked controversy on social media.
The post on the Wings Over Scotland blog amplified comments attributed to Alba Party candidate for Central Scotland, Margaret Lynch.
A tweet on Saturday 10 April by another party supporter claimed Lynch had argued in an online party forum for women that LGBT+ groups in Scotland were lobbying to reduce the age of consent to 10.
Although the tweet was subsequently deleted, screen grabs of it continued to be shared online and Lynch has subsequently re-shared other tweets making similar arguments from her Twitter account.
The author of the Wings Over Scotland blog developed the claims further. In a post he described a document said to provide evidence for the claims as a ‘paedophile charter,’ and concluded the SNP are “paying lobby groups with your money to try to reduce the age of consent in Scotland to 10”.
This blog post was subsequently shared on Twitter by Alba Party MP and Scottish Parliamentary candidate, Neale Hanvey. It was also shared repeatedly on Twitter, and in a number of Facebook groups.
Ferret Fact Service looked at this claim and rated it FFS.
https://theferret.scot/claim-snp-funding-paedophile-charter-groups-ffs/
But let's try to rise above our prejudices.
A litigant-in-person has been hit with a bill of almost £100,000 in costs, after the court slammed him for being "difficult to deal with, condescending" and "offensive".
Sir Henry Royce Memorial, a charitable foundation, brought a claim in the High Court for costs on an indemnity basis against former finance director Mark Hardy. The claim followed a previous trial where Hardy had accused Sir Henry Royce Memorial and its directors of fraud and false accounting.
Hardy's accusations of wrongdoing by the directors were unproven. And the court ruled that his request for inspection of documents under the Companies Act was invalid, and not made for a proper purpose.
Judge Paul Matthews ruled that Hardy had a "rather condescending manner" and exhibited "unnecessary" behaviour when dealing with the other side, which resulted in "more time and resources" being spent on the "problems of tone and language than in addressing the real issues in the case."
The judge said the matter did not require "such disproportionate efforts" from Hardy, and highlighted his "excessive correspondence", which ran to two lever arch files for the trial bundle. Hardy had also exhibited a 500 page transcript of a particular meeting, which the judge noted was not "more than remotely relevant to the issues in the case".
Hardy had "vigorously" insisted that a remote trial of his claim should be live streamed on the internet because there would be a great public interest with "possibly hundreds of requests to join". However, no more than 14 members of the public requested the link.
The judge said Hardy should not be excused for his behaviour just because he was a litigant-in-person. The problem was that Hardy had "no sense of responsibility to the system" and "no duty of the kind that would be owed by a lawyer to the court," said the judge.
The claimant sought to recover costs estimated at around £163,000 on an indemnity basis. The judge said the size of the costs was "significant" and while they may be justified, "are somewhat larger than I would have expected for what is essentially a short point under the Companies Act."
The judge ordered Hardy to pay 60% of the costs upfront, with the remainder going for detailed assessment.
https://www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/litigant-person-hit-ps100k-bill
Never, never, ever be a LIP.
I have also just been informed that my own former MP for Norwich North - Ian Gibson - has died at 82.
Double checking extremely low death numbers maybe?
It's hard to know where to draw the line, but some people intentionally or not take the piss when they play barrack room lawyer out of a misplaced sense of thoroughness, and a hyper focus on tone and language, and arguing over trivial matters, is a common sign of it.
Very busy, no-one wearing masks except staff. Prices hiked a fair bit but I don't begrudge that given the torrid time hospitality has had. I reckon they have done 250-300 covers over lunch time (it's a big pub) and if average £25 a head that's approx £7k takings.
Good for them.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/shirley-williams-how-margaret-thatcher-changed-britain-8564673.html
The current leadership is made up of Independent union, Conservatives + Vetrans with Independents supporting them
Burn Valley - 2 independents standing again
De Bruce - Labour
Fens - 2 Independent Union both standing again
Foggy - was socialist labour so probably Labour
Hart - Independent is standing down - Tory won the the seat last time round
Headland - the 3 Hartlepool Independent Candidates will win again (they are all mad around there)
Manor House - was Socialist Labour so probably Labour
Rural West - 3 Tories all standing again
Seaton - It will be the 2 independents that won last time
Throston (was Jesmond) was 1 Hartlepool people, 1 labour, 1 reform UK - not a clue
Victoria - 3 seats were Labour will be again
So yes are a lot of independent candidates who are really Tory
Why pay to watch middle aged men fighting on a Saturday night, when you go to a spoons and watch it for free?
Has anything amusing ever happened to you in connection with a 'spoons?
vs Yesterday
That's a terrible number for positive tests, if it's right. As you say, seems completely out of whack with recent trends.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-56690579
from cases
from hospitalisations
Well Uber has published new figures and it is on target to delivery $52bn of food over the next year worldwide
https://twitter.com/benedictevans/status/1381632619004235779
Uber’s delivery business is at a run-rate of $52bn. 🤯 (Though total 2019 US restaurant spending was $770bn) https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001543151/84bcb1ae-108c-493b-a622-c8fcd2bb29b7.pdf
It also says there will be an impact due to the Employment tribunal result and there are other tax issues in the UK (which is the VAT case we talked about on Friday).
"President Mitterrand used to bring her flowers when they met. In private, he admitted to his friends that he found her very attractive. She had, he said, the eyes of Caligula, but the mouth of Marilyn Monroe."
But I think a lot of the public don't think rationally about pubs anyway, given the sorts of reactions to closures and conversions of pubs which people simply are not going to enough to keep open.
Hartlepool was always a place to fill up the car for the return journey - for some unknown reason, it had the cheapest petrol in the country.
The problem isn't with Wetherspoons it's with other large breweries charging ridiculous rent and not allowing pubs to choose their own beer or prices.
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/testing
1,218.037 vs 913,693.
As ever, it pays to look into the details.
https://www.politico.eu/coronavirus-in-europe/
One possible side effect of proximity to the vaccine seemed to be a tendency to move in slow motion. Some of the NHS staff seemed particularly badly affected. Something to look out for.
Nevertheless, they are pretty aggressive on the tax side, and I can't blame small pub owners being put out by them.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-farooqi-others.pdf