Is it just me, or are you now getting absolutely spammed with ticket announcements for events summer 2021 onwards?
Not heavily, but I had several gig tickets kicked back into 2021.
I am getting the rearranged dates as well, but i am getting marketing emails left, right and centre from ticketmaster, venues etc all pimping all the shows they have upcoming.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
I've always pronounced it that way as my Russian grandmother did (I don't think it's "right" just fun and it's second nature). I wonder if there is a similar background for Lawson? I think she's has at least one grandparent from one of the Baltic states, although presumably they predated the microwave.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
She didn't interfere. Had the Scots considered carefully their vote and voted for independence she would have signed a Dissolution of Union Bill if it was put before her.
Haven’t been around much today. Has anyone noted the the NI trusted trader border scheme provides a rather near template for independent Scotland border arrangements, should they join the EU ?
Haven’t been around much today. Has anyone noted the the NI trusted trader border scheme provides a rather near template for independent Scotland border arrangements, should they join the EU ?
Moreover, Scotland doesn't therefore have to be independent to join the EU, indeed. It has been, and will be, noticed.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
Nice try. A mildly made yet provocative comment is significant interfernce in a democratic vote? Are you even listening to yourself? How stupid do you think people are?
There are persuasive reasons for a republic, I don't know why you don't just make those unless you are in fact a secret royalist. Frankly, that seems more likely at this point. I find that more believable than that you actually have a problem with a figurehead monarch not having power.
It seemed very odd timing. Why not wait until after Easter? And make a big thing of meeting thise vaccinating people, those oldies who are now safe etc.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
We don't know. Only way to find out: campaign successfully for such a bill to be put to her, and see. And I have never set much store by tittle tattle about what x says y claims z avers she hinted to him over lunch.
And just look across the Atlantic. This is not a good time to be asserting the superiority of presidents over monarchs in Anglo Saxon polities. At least she doesn't tweet much.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
Nice try. A mildly made yet provocative comment is significant interfernce in a democratic vote? Are you even listening to yourself? How stupid do you think people are?
There are persuasive reasons for a republic, I don't know why you don't just make those unless you are in fact a secret royalist. Frankly, that seems more likely at this point.
Given the massive media attention any time a minor royal breaks wind, and the huge attention to HMTQ's comment re indyref at the time, I wouldn't be so sure.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
So Boris jets off to do his steps in the great Euro-Deal dance - will it be a triumph for the Prime Minister or a triumph for the Prime Minister? Who knows....
Anyhow, counting continues in the US presidential election where Biden now leads Trump by 7,060,412 according to CBS News.
Maryland has finished its count with Biden up by 33 points.
States with 99% counted are:
Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Rhode Island
In Alaska, ED14 is only 92.7% counted and I note ED27 and ED28 were both won by Write-Ins. In Colorado, only a handful of votes left. In Illinois, there still seems quite a bit of counting to do albeit in the small rural counties and finally Rhode Island where four counties have counted 95% of the vote and all the others 100%.
Finally, in the two House results to be declared, the Republicans lead by 6 votes in Iowa 2 and by 12 votes in New York 22 so it may be a while yet...
Lost out on the highly contested 2019 hubris prize to "Meet Jo Swinson: Britain's Next Prime Minister".
Disappointing bronze medal for "Oven Ready Deal", which would've stormed it in any normal year. Still, in fairness Johnson really put down a marker for the 2020 award with "This is going to be a fantastic year for Britain!" and two thumbs up on day one.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
Nice try. A mildly made yet provocative comment is significant interfernce in a democratic vote? Are you even listening to yourself? How stupid do you think people are?
There are persuasive reasons for a republic, I don't know why you don't just make those unless you are in fact a secret royalist. Frankly, that seems more likely at this point. I find that more believable than that you actually have a problem with a figurehead monarch not having power.
I really do, because of work I'm not going to finish/publish it this year, but I've got a piece a quarter written about the possibility that during WWII but for his libido our monarch would have been a Nazi sympathiser.
That's a shocking place for a country to be in.
A future monarch with extreme views could cause anarchy and real harm to the country, I'd rather preempt that from happening.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
Tories should be up a handful of seats on your figures post boundary changes shouldn't they? Creeping closer to the magic number. Not that it matters. Johnson will be through the roof on the announcement of his deal later
Chancellor Angela Merkel urged Germans to rein in Christmas celebrations, making an unusually emotional appeal as the country’s soft shutdown fails to slow the coronavirus spread.
Calling for tougher measures, she appealed for restraint over the holidays to protect friends and family. While the government will seek to keep schools open, closing non-essential stores, sending children home for the holidays early and further reducing contact between people is the right path, Merkel said on Wednesday in Berlin.
Wait until Bruno finds out who Her Majesty has honoured.
Sir Robert Mugabe for starters.
On the advice of her then Prime Minister John Major....in 1994.
Who advised Macron to do it, and if it was such a great idea, why did the French not issue any photographs?
As we saw with the prorogation crisis the Queen will do anything her PM tells her to do, including unlawful stuff, and we call ourselves a democracy.
Our constitution is based on Crown in Parliament, the Crown will never overturn a bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but otherwise the PM has full prerogative powers over the rest as the Crown's chief minister
So if Parliament passed a modern day Edict of Expulsion the Queen would pass it?
Her Majesty interfering in the legislative process is as unthinkable as a deputy editor of this website resorting to below-the-line trolling.
What's crazier is Her Majesty also trolls below the line. I think she's Beibheirli_C, as she's a fan of Ireland.
Well Her Majesty trolled the Scot Nats in 2014.
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
Nice try. A mildly made yet provocative comment is significant interfernce in a democratic vote? Are you even listening to yourself? How stupid do you think people are?
There are persuasive reasons for a republic, I don't know why you don't just make those unless you are in fact a secret royalist. Frankly, that seems more likely at this point. I find that more believable than that you actually have a problem with a figurehead monarch not having power.
I really do, because of work I'm not going to finish/publish it this year, but I've got a piece a quarter written about the possibility that during WWII but for his libido our monarch would have been a Nazi sympathiser.
That's a shocking place for a country to be in.
A future monarch with extreme views could cause anarchy and real harm to the country, I'd rather preempt that from happening.
But, hang on, I thought he would pass whatever was put before him, like Liz and the Expulsion thing? And how silly to generalise from one remote counterfactual when you have the all too factual Trumps, Putins, Win Myints and Xi Jinpings on the other side of the ledger.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
Quite right too. Baldwin was a Cambridge man, while Asquith studied Classics at Balliol, Oxford, like a proper Prime Minister, like Boris.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
Quite right too. Baldwin was a Cambridge man, while Asquith studied Classics at Balliol, Oxford, like a proper Prime Minister, like Boris.
Baldwin our last Cambridge educated PM, though we have had a Cambridge educated Leader of the Opposition more recently ie Michael Howard from 2003 to 2005
Given the massive media attention any time a minor royal breaks wind, and the huge attention to HMTQ's comment re indyref at the time, I wouldn't be so sure.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
Precisely, it's not necessarily such comments in themselves, it's the fawning amplification of them by our media, particularly our state broadcaster.
'queen says scots should think very carefully' gives 13.5million hits on Google, with this at the top.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
Ahem, say the Corbynista MPs......
The Corbynites and the ERG would obviously be difficult but those are the raw numbers
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
One non SNP seat in Scotland?
Edinburgh South, the SNP though would hold the balance of power at Westminster as well as running Scotland that is true.
England would have a Tory majority but the SNP would tell PM Starmer what to do
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
One non SNP seat in Scotland?
Almost certainly Ian Murray so hold for Red Toryism; the best of both worlds (for certain folk)!
Given the massive media attention any time a minor royal breaks wind, and the huge attention to HMTQ's comment re indyref at the time, I wouldn't be so sure.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
Precisely, it's not necessarily such comments in themselves, it's the fawning amplification of them by our media, particularly our state broadcaster.
'queen says scots should think very carefully' gives 13.5million hits on Google, with this at the top.
Saying "think very carefully" during a referendum really ought to not be shocking.
I'd be like "I've thought carefully about it and am voting Yes".
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
One non SNP seat in Scotland?
Almost certainly Ian Murray so hold for Red Toryism; the best of both worlds (for certain folk)!
Given the massive media attention any time a minor royal breaks wind, and the huge attention to HMTQ's comment re indyref at the time, I wouldn't be so sure.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
Precisely, it's not necessarily such comments in themselves, it's the fawning amplification of them by our media, particularly our state broadcaster.
'queen says scots should think very carefully' gives 13.5million hits on Google, with this at the top.
Saying "think very carefully" during a referendum really ought to not be shocking.
I'd be like "I've thought carefully about it and am voting Yes".
If she'd said similar before the EU referendum, the streets would have been strewn with prolapsing Faragistas.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
One non SNP seat in Scotland?
Almost certainly Ian Murray so hold for Red Toryism; the best of both worlds (for certain folk)!
Hey you've got to be polite to your local MP! And anyway he's far from a Tory. Further I'd say than Nicola.
Given the massive media attention any time a minor royal breaks wind, and the huge attention to HMTQ's comment re indyref at the time, I wouldn't be so sure.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
Precisely, it's not necessarily such comments in themselves, it's the fawning amplification of them by our media, particularly our state broadcaster.
'queen says scots should think very carefully' gives 13.5million hits on Google, with this at the top.
Saying "think very carefully" during a referendum really ought to not be shocking.
I'd be like "I've thought carefully about it and am voting Yes".
If she'd said similar before the EU referendum, the streets would have been strewn with prolapsing Faragistas.
I think the Queen did subtly do her best to influence both refs - Indy against and Brexit for, without explicitly endorsing her preferred outcome.
I think there's some justification for that action in the national importance of both these events. Nobody would think twice about the Royal family supporting the UK against an external aggressor, so it seems somewhat unrealistic to expect them to be blase about the prospect of internal political dissolution, or (and I accept this is a more niche perspective) of external political subsumption. I wouldn't expect the monarch to take a view on other political issues.
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
One non SNP seat in Scotland?
Almost certainly Ian Murray so hold for Red Toryism; the best of both worlds (for certain folk)!
Hey you've got to be polite to your local MP! And anyway he's far from a Tory. Further I'd say than Nicola.
He's my brother's mp rather than mine, my bit's gone completely aff Labour.
It's an interesting question, would Ian or Nicola have been a better fit for Change UK? We'll never know I guess...
Comments
https://twitter.com/Jord_an1/status/1336044936144228357
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/tv/nigella-lawson-goes-viral-pronunciation-19420223
So we've established she'll sign a bill expelling Jews from the UK but she'll happily interferes in democratic votes.
https://twitter.com/michpoligal/status/1336742066261553156?s=19
Has anyone noted the the NI trusted trader border scheme provides a rather near template for independent Scotland border arrangements, should they join the EU ?
There are persuasive reasons for a republic, I don't know why you don't just make those unless you are in fact a secret royalist. Frankly, that seems more likely at this point. I find that more believable than that you actually have a problem with a figurehead monarch not having power.
Biden 1.05
Democrats 1.05
Biden PV 1.02
Biden PV 49-51.9% 1.04
Trump PV 46-48.9% 1.05
Trump ECV 210-239 1.07
Biden ECV 300-329 1.07
Biden ECV Hcap -48.5 1.05
Biden ECV Hcap -63.5 1.06
Trump ECV Hcap +81.5 1.01
AZ Dem 1.05
GA Dem 1.05
MI Dem 1.05
NV Dem 1.05
PA Dem 1.05
WI Dem 1.05
Trump to leave before end of term NO 1.1
Trump exit date 2021 1.09
And just look across the Atlantic. This is not a good time to be asserting the superiority of presidents over monarchs in Anglo Saxon polities. At least she doesn't tweet much.
There was something about itr in a recentlyt published political memoir, too, which rather emphasised the impoirtance Mr Cameron placed on getting Her Maj to come out with it, which ctrengthen's TSE's point considerably. But I fotget he details, not being a slavish royalist (was put off for life byt doing a scrapbook for Cub Scouts and readingf that book by Her Maj's nanny/governess).
In any case once we have a new sovereigh and PM the wish to retain a monarchy will change downwards.
https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1336672178981449731?s=20
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/usercode.py?scotcontrol=Y&CON=38&LAB=38&LIB=6&Brexit=3&Green=5&UKIP=&TVCON=&TVLAB=&TVLIB=&TVBrexit=&TVGreen=&TVUKIP=&SCOTCON=19.3&SCOTLAB=19&SCOTLIB=5.7&SCOTBrexit=1&SCOTGreen=1.7&SCOTUKIP=&SCOTNAT=51.7&display=AllChanged&regorseat=(none)&boundary=2019
So the Tories would be largest party but Starmer would be PM with SNP and LD support, the Labour and SNP and LD combined total coming to 327 MPs, an overall majority of 1.
It would be the first time the party with most seats failed to form the UK government since Baldwin's Tories won most seats in 1923 but Macdonald's Labour formed a government with Asquith's Liberals.
So Boris jets off to do his steps in the great Euro-Deal dance - will it be a triumph for the Prime Minister or a triumph for the Prime Minister? Who knows....
Anyhow, counting continues in the US presidential election where Biden now leads Trump by 7,060,412 according to CBS News.
Maryland has finished its count with Biden up by 33 points.
States with 99% counted are:
Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Rhode Island
In Alaska, ED14 is only 92.7% counted and I note ED27 and ED28 were both won by Write-Ins. In Colorado, only a handful of votes left. In Illinois, there still seems quite a bit of counting to do albeit in the small rural counties and finally Rhode Island where four counties have counted 95% of the vote and all the others 100%.
Finally, in the two House results to be declared, the Republicans lead by 6 votes in Iowa 2 and by 12 votes in New York 22 so it may be a while yet...
Disappointing bronze medal for "Oven Ready Deal", which would've stormed it in any normal year. Still, in fairness Johnson really put down a marker for the 2020 award with "This is going to be a fantastic year for Britain!" and two thumbs up on day one.
That's a shocking place for a country to be in.
A future monarch with extreme views could cause anarchy and real harm to the country, I'd rather preempt that from happening.
Post a thank you video. Or get a real job. Or do it next year post vaccinations. No need to be meeting people during a pandemic.
https://twitter.com/LadPolitics/status/1336744969499971585
Calling for tougher measures, she appealed for restraint over the holidays to protect friends and family. While the government will seek to keep schools open, closing non-essential stores, sending children home for the holidays early and further reducing contact between people is the right path, Merkel said on Wednesday in Berlin.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-09/merkel-pleads-for-tougher-virus-curbs-to-fight-stubborn-outbreak
And we are going to open up more for Christmas...shaked head....
https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1336353763418906639?s=20
Since when?
'queen says scots should think very carefully' gives 13.5million hits on Google, with this at the top.
https://twitter.com/heraldscotland/status/1336752474753908739?s=20
If the devolved administrations have not spent "business support funds" on "business support" the Chancellor should claw it back
England would have a Tory majority but the SNP would tell PM Starmer what to do
I'd be like "I've thought carefully about it and am voting Yes".
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/28/snp-conference-free-breakfast-lunch-primary-john-swinney
It's bloody irresponsible and stupid to be making unnecessary trips like this when we are trying to suppress the virus with Tiers.
Maybe if they only visited Tier 1 locations it would be different but that would be a short trip.
https://twitter.com/ReutersUK/status/1336753766842986497?s=20
I think there's some justification for that action in the national importance of both these events. Nobody would think twice about the Royal family supporting the UK against an external aggressor, so it seems somewhat unrealistic to expect them to be blase about the prospect of internal political dissolution, or (and I accept this is a more niche perspective) of external political subsumption. I wouldn't expect the monarch to take a view on other political issues.
Although it's probably inaccurate and out of date as https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-us-logs-3157-more-coronavirus-deaths-a-record-for-a-single-day-12150371 says there was 3157 on 1 day
https://www.bing.com/search?q=covid+deaths+usa&cvid=9d2b4b1639654e469155deb6349846ce&FORM=ANAB01&PC=U531 also has a chart with daily new deaths on it.
It's an interesting question, would Ian or Nicola have been a better fit for Change UK? We'll never know I guess...