Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The UK set to be the first where people are vaccinated – politicalbetting.com

24

Comments

  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,460
    edited November 2020
    "One of the big gambles that Johnson and his team has made has been to pre-order tens of millions of vaccines spread out across different potential suppliers."

    I take issue with calling it a big gamble. It was actually good governance (for once). A big gamble would have been to just rely on Oxford vaccine or to try and wait until announcements before placing orders.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    malcolmg said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Bizarre Anglocentric headline. "THE UK SET TO BE THE FIRST WHERE PEOPLE ARE VACCINATED"

    I think China has already vaccinated a million people. Russia has a vaccination program.

    (I have a high opinion of Russian science, so I don't share the routine pb-sneering of Russia).

    A prominent Russian journalist who had been given the vaccine announced yesterday that he has fallen ill with coronavirus, so either he was unlucky, or what he was given was ineffective.
    If it is 92% effective then it doesn't work on one in every 12 people. Lot of people.
    Is it not the case though that once you get above 80 % or so that it makes it almost herd immunity and it will die out etc
    Absolutely. But where we are now, being vaccinated but still getting it is no surprise.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 21,965
    Foxy said:

    Any truth in the rumour that PPE graduates will be in the first tranche for the vaccine?

    After all, we've been hearing how important PPE is for the past 9 months.

    Nailed on that chums of the government are first in the queue. Get out of the way plebs.
    Didn't Bozo get a flu jab the other day. Other over 50s have to wait until December.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    edited November 2020
    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:


    One of my all-time favourite scientists was an anti-vaxxer.

    Alfred Russell Wallace, biologist, socialist. The wealthy Charles Darwin's impoverished competitor.

    Wallace argued that both liberty and science need to be taken into account, but that liberty is more important than science.

    It is a brave argument.

    An anti vaxxer or just an asserter that our bodies don't belong to the state and we get a say in what goes into them? I for example support a jehovah's witness's right to refuse medical interventions for themselves but it doesn't make me anti medical intervention
    He seems to have been simply wrong on the science, he thought the smallpox vaccine was ineffective. The argument was about vaccinating children, no one has evet tried compulsory vaccination of adults nor compulsory procedures on adult JWs.
    No not as yet, but there is compulsory and practically compulsory. If a vaccination for Covid is necessary to be employed, go on a train, a bus, a plane, a bar, a restaurant etc then while not in the legal sense its compulsory it is practically compulsory.

    A good example of this is a while back I was offered a deal to leave from a company I worked for. However I had to run it past a solicitor. However to do that I had to have photo id. Now I don't have a driving licence with a photo nor did I have a valid passport at the time. Photo id is not compulsory however practically I had to get one just so I could accept the agreement
    The reason for needing a solicitor is that s.203 of the Employment Rights Act mean that an employee needs to take independent legal advice on such deals. The reason for needing the photo ID was, believe it or not, money laundering.

    I get this all the time. A client needs me to look at a simple settlement (formerly compromise) agreement on his or her exit from employment but my firm (and nearly all others) requires photo ID and proof of address from all new clients because, in large transactions, law firm client accounts are often used to launder money. Firms get into big trouble if they don't go through client due diligence. I accept that it's frustrating because, as I am sure was the case for you, no money was moving in or out of client account but the rules are rigedly enforced.
  • Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    It's certainly not looking good for them. They could be at three times the case numbers of the rest of the UK by mid December, with corresponding death numbers around New Year.

    Labour might have just lost the Senedd election in May.
    But at least they did things differently to England.

    The wrong things but different.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,828

    "One of the big gambles that Johnson and his team has made has been to pre-order tens of millions of vaccines spread out across different potential suppliers."

    I take issue with calling it a big gamble. It was actually good governance (for once). A big gamble would have been to just rely on Oxford vaccine or to try and wait until announcements before placing orders.

    How is that a gamble? A gamble would be to buy only one.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    It's certainly not looking good for them. They could be at three times the case numbers of the rest of the UK by mid December, with corresponding death numbers around New Year.

    Labour might have just lost the Senedd election in May.
    There are regular broadcasts from some of the English Labour posters on pb,com, reassuring us ignorant Welsh that Drakeford has the matter under control.

    But -- I agree -- the data do seem to show that Drakeford has fucked up rather spectacularly this Autumn.
    I have only seen one pro-Drakeford post on PB (I haven't really been looking though) and that was predictably from that infamous Corbynista, TSE.

    Have you done your "big lockdown" shop for (my prediction) next Friday yet?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,828
    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Bizarre Anglocentric headline. "THE UK SET TO BE THE FIRST WHERE PEOPLE ARE VACCINATED"

    I think China has already vaccinated a million people. Russia has a vaccination program.

    (I have a high opinion of Russian science, so I don't share the routine pb-sneering of Russia).

    A prominent Russian journalist who had been given the vaccine announced yesterday that he has fallen ill with coronavirus, so either he was unlucky, or what he was given was ineffective.
    If it is 92% effective then it doesn't work on one in every 12 people. Lot of people.
    Is it not the case though that once you get above 80 % or so that it makes it almost herd immunity and it will die out etc
    Absolutely. But where we are now, being vaccinated but still getting it is no surprise.
    Yeah, the story about the Russian journalist wouldn't be surprising in the slightest, and tells us nothing about its efficacy.
  • IshmaelZ said:

    DougSeal said:

    Pagan2 said:

    DougSeal said:

    I'm writing an article at this evening about whether employers can legally require employees to take a vaccine. I like them to be short and pithy but I'm bogged down in an analysis of whether anti-vaxx could be a "philosophical belief" under the Equality Act. I immediately said "no", its more akin to a non-protected political belief, but now I'm doubting myself because ethical veganism was held in January to be protected against discrimination - and both largely revolve around what you put in your body. I'll fudge that bit for the mo and move onto H&S.

    While not an antivaxxer by any means I am in the 50% that wait category. Maybe because I grew up when thalidomide is a thing. I think someone could quite probably make a case that the accelerated testing on the vaccine gave them doubts about its safety. I believe the normal time to introduce a new vaccine is 7 years and a lot of that is addressing safety issues. As a layman on this I therefore assume that 7 years testing has a reason for it rather than just a number plucked out of thin air.

    I would suggest a company could quite rightly say you can't come into the office without a vaccination but would be on stickier ground firing you if you can work from home just because you took a wait and see approach

    Also on the ethical vegan thing is the vaccine not tested on animals?
    I don't know if the vaccine is tested on animals but even if it were it would only be indirectly discriminatory and would therefore justifiable. It's only direct discrimination (e.g. "we're firing you because you're a woman/asian/gay/Catholic etc etc") that can't be justified - except for age discrimination where you can theoretically kick out oldies just because of age if you can show there is a need to make room for younger workers, but even that is difficult.
    How will the company know its employees' vaccination status? (We mentioned this the other day in respect of airlines.) Is Nadhim Zahawi going to hand out certificates of vaccination? Will there be a central database created (with accompanying privacy issues)?
    Vaccination certificates are standard; you have to show them at the borders of countries which require them (e.g. yellow fever in some African countries)
    For past 6 months, it has also been standard when entering a whole load of countries to have paperwork proving one or two negative covid tests in the past 7 days. I don't see how its much different to that.
  • JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 682
    Pagan2 said:

    Fortunately PB is the only "social media" I participate in as I dont have a facebook account, twitter account or linkenin account

    You social media Luddite .... well done .... :smile:

  • "One of the big gambles that Johnson and his team has made has been to pre-order tens of millions of vaccines spread out across different potential suppliers."

    I take issue with calling it a big gamble. It was actually good governance (for once). A big gamble would have been to just rely on Oxford vaccine or to try and wait until announcements before placing orders.

    It's the one area the government have actually been world beating.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,513
    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
  • alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    Or Whitty, Vallance etc.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Do vegans think viruses are made of meat?
  • alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
  • Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    Omnium said:

    DougSeal said:

    I'm writing an article at this evening about whether employers can legally require employees to take a vaccine. I like them to be short and pithy but I'm bogged down in an analysis of whether anti-vaxx could be a "philosophical belief" under the Equality Act. I immediately said "no", its more akin to a non-protected political belief, but now I'm doubting myself because ethical veganism was held in January to be protected against discrimination - and both largely revolve around what you put in your body. I'll fudge that bit for the mo and move onto H&S.

    We've been discussing this at work this week, the considered view is that someone's ethical veganism won't cause colleagues to die/get ill unlike a militant antivaxxer.

    But that's a work in progress.
    I'd imagine that employers can choose to exclude people based on a criterion from their building. They can't unemploy someone on the basis that they refuse to comply though. Employers have no power over you outside the workplace.
    Actually they do have some power.

    Some can sack you for what you post on social media for starters.
    I'd guess that's tricky. If you posted from within the workplace fair enough, but if you posted elsewhere and din't make a connection with your company. The employer would have to make an argument that this counted as within the workplace - and I think that's the line. (There are almost certainly experts on this available on PB, and they probably are avoiding any comment - I don't comment on my personal specialist area - and the streets are not so well swept as a result)
    My contract of employment says I can also be sacked for drug use.

    Something some people do outside the workplace.

    Take Jake Hepple, he wasn't sacked for organising the 'White Lives Matter' banner on a plane, he was sacked for repeatedly using racist terms on social media and admitting drug use.
    I wonder on what basis 'drug use' might be judged though.

    Employment contracts say all sorts of wild and wonderful things, most usually relating to IP. They're often not enforceable though.

    Extreme conduct might spill over, and perhaps the case you cite is an example of that.

    Plenty of places have random mandatory drug tests.

    It is a bloody pain, some people have performance issues, one person it took them six hours to pee.
    That's 'in the office' though.
    If you drink a couple of litres of water you'll want to go before a couple of hours are out.

    Occupations like Air Traffic Controllers, Tube Drivers, Bus Drivers, Ferry Captains, who knows what else. These occupations bring with them an expectation of care on the employer and that expectation must devolve to the employee too.

    Half the City would perhaps admit to having at one time used drugs - they're not likely to be sacked.
    Not just half the City. Last summer's Conservative leadership election had them queueing up to confess the *one time* they had tried drugs. No-one cared, except it was fatal for Michael Gove's chances but then he went well OTT.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    edited November 2020

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
  • IshmaelZ said:

    Do vegans think viruses are made of meat?

    No, but they think some of them are tested on animals.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848
    DougSeal said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:


    One of my all-time favourite scientists was an anti-vaxxer.

    Alfred Russell Wallace, biologist, socialist. The wealthy Charles Darwin's impoverished competitor.

    Wallace argued that both liberty and science need to be taken into account, but that liberty is more important than science.

    It is a brave argument.

    An anti vaxxer or just an asserter that our bodies don't belong to the state and we get a say in what goes into them? I for example support a jehovah's witness's right to refuse medical interventions for themselves but it doesn't make me anti medical intervention
    He seems to have been simply wrong on the science, he thought the smallpox vaccine was ineffective. The argument was about vaccinating children, no one has evet tried compulsory vaccination of adults nor compulsory procedures on adult JWs.
    No not as yet, but there is compulsory and practically compulsory. If a vaccination for Covid is necessary to be employed, go on a train, a bus, a plane, a bar, a restaurant etc then while not in the legal sense its compulsory it is practically compulsory.

    A good example of this is a while back I was offered a deal to leave from a company I worked for. However I had to run it past a solicitor. However to do that I had to have photo id. Now I don't have a driving licence with a photo nor did I have a valid passport at the time. Photo id is not compulsory however practically I had to get one just so I could accept the agreement
    The reason for needing a solicitor is that s.203 of the Employment Rights Act mean that an employee needs to take independent legal advice on such deals. The reason for needing the photo ID was, believe it or not, money laundering.

    I get this all the time. A client needs me to look at a simple settlement (formerly compromise) agreement on his or her exit from employment but my firm (and nearly all others) requires photo ID and proof of address from all new clients because, in large transactions, law firm client accounts are often used to launder money. Firms get into big trouble if they don't go through client due diligence. I accept that it's frustrating because, as I am sure was the case for you, no money was moving in or out of client account but the rules are rigedly enforced.
    Don't get me wrong wasn't blaming the solicitor and was aware it was money laundering laws I merely used it as example of something not being legally compulsory but practically compulsory
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
    I wasn't referring to you at all BigG. Perish the thought. You wouldn't be encouraged to see the pandemic run riot in Wales to confirm Boris' wisdom.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,460
    edited November 2020
    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
  • alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    DougSeal said:

    Pagan2 said:

    DougSeal said:

    I'm writing an article at this evening about whether employers can legally require employees to take a vaccine. I like them to be short and pithy but I'm bogged down in an analysis of whether anti-vaxx could be a "philosophical belief" under the Equality Act. I immediately said "no", its more akin to a non-protected political belief, but now I'm doubting myself because ethical veganism was held in January to be protected against discrimination - and both largely revolve around what you put in your body. I'll fudge that bit for the mo and move onto H&S.

    While not an antivaxxer by any means I am in the 50% that wait category. Maybe because I grew up when thalidomide is a thing. I think someone could quite probably make a case that the accelerated testing on the vaccine gave them doubts about its safety. I believe the normal time to introduce a new vaccine is 7 years and a lot of that is addressing safety issues. As a layman on this I therefore assume that 7 years testing has a reason for it rather than just a number plucked out of thin air.

    I would suggest a company could quite rightly say you can't come into the office without a vaccination but would be on stickier ground firing you if you can work from home just because you took a wait and see approach

    Also on the ethical vegan thing is the vaccine not tested on animals?
    I don't know if the vaccine is tested on animals but even if it were it would only be indirectly discriminatory and would therefore justifiable. It's only direct discrimination (e.g. "we're firing you because you're a woman/asian/gay/Catholic etc etc") that can't be justified - except for age discrimination where you can theoretically kick out oldies just because of age if you can show there is a need to make room for younger workers, but even that is difficult.
    How will the company know its employees' vaccination status? (We mentioned this the other day in respect of airlines.) Is Nadhim Zahawi going to hand out certificates of vaccination? Will there be a central database created (with accompanying privacy issues)?
    They can ask for medical records. Many contracts have a provision for that, the employee can object, but the objection may be a disciplinary. Some I have spoken to are also looking iinto getting supplies off the grey market.
  • Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    It's certainly not looking good for them. They could be at three times the case numbers of the rest of the UK by mid December, with corresponding death numbers around New Year.

    Labour might have just lost the Senedd election in May.
    There are regular broadcasts from some of the English Labour posters on pb,com, reassuring us ignorant Welsh that Drakeford has the matter under control.

    But -- I agree -- the data do seem to show that Drakeford has fucked up rather spectacularly this Autumn.
    I have only seen one pro-Drakeford post on PB (I haven't really been looking though) and that was predictably from that infamous Corbynista, TSE.

    Have you done your "big lockdown" shop for (my prediction) next Friday yet?
    Drakeford was a disaster on health and education long before covid
  • alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
    The people who deserve to be castigated are those who came up with the name 'circuit breaker' ** which gives the impression that it permanently stops the spread.

    If I was Drakeford I would apologise and say that I followed scientific advice but it turned out the scientific advice was crap.

    ** Generally its always wise to be wary of things with catchy but stupid names.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
  • alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
    I wasn't referring to you at all BigG. Perish the thought. You wouldn't be encouraged to see the pandemic run riot in Wales to confirm Boris' wisdom.
    Of course I would not.

    My family and all my grandchildren are at risk here in Wales
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
    I wasn't referring to you at all BigG. Perish the thought. You wouldn't be encouraged to see the pandemic run riot in Wales to confirm Boris' wisdom.
    Of course I would not.

    My family and all my grandchildren are at risk here in Wales
    Indeed, me too.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,460
    edited November 2020

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    It's certainly not looking good for them. They could be at three times the case numbers of the rest of the UK by mid December, with corresponding death numbers around New Year.

    Labour might have just lost the Senedd election in May.
    There are regular broadcasts from some of the English Labour posters on pb,com, reassuring us ignorant Welsh that Drakeford has the matter under control.

    But -- I agree -- the data do seem to show that Drakeford has fucked up rather spectacularly this Autumn.
    I have only seen one pro-Drakeford post on PB (I haven't really been looking though) and that was predictably from that infamous Corbynista, TSE.

    Have you done your "big lockdown" shop for (my prediction) next Friday yet?
    I am mainly supplied from a supermarket 70 odd miles away in Aberystwyth. The delivery is booked for next week, so I should be fine.

    It is a particular joy to see them manoeuvre their delivery van down the remote, narrow, one-way track that leads to my isolated Plas. 😁
  • alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848
    JACK_W said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Fortunately PB is the only "social media" I participate in as I dont have a facebook account, twitter account or linkenin account

    You social media Luddite .... well done .... :smile:

    Not a luddite merely they don't offer anything I want
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,209
    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344
    If the MHRA (and, for belt and braces) either the FDA or the EMA are happy with the Oxford/Zeneca then I’ll have it. And ASAP. Otherwise I feel that there are are odd clouds hanging over it.
    Obviously a working vaccine is the answer and we all need it, as I said, ASAP.
    I don’t any Govt has covered itself with glory over coronavirus.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Well one or two of them came from England, because work contacts from the Bristol area were asking me on the SP for coming over the bridge.

    You may well be right and they already live here, I suspect some (many) might not, but I couldn't possibly say that.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    It's certainly not looking good for them. They could be at three times the case numbers of the rest of the UK by mid December, with corresponding death numbers around New Year.

    Labour might have just lost the Senedd election in May.
    There are regular broadcasts from some of the English Labour posters on pb,com, reassuring us ignorant Welsh that Drakeford has the matter under control.

    But -- I agree -- the data do seem to show that Drakeford has fucked up rather spectacularly this Autumn.
    I have only seen one pro-Drakeford post on PB (I haven't really been looking though) and that was predictably from that infamous Corbynista, TSE.

    Have you done your "big lockdown" shop for (my prediction) next Friday yet?
    I am mainly supplied from a supermarket 70 odd miles away in Aberystwyth. The delivery is booked for next week, so I should be fine.

    It is a particular joy to see them manoeuvre their delivery van down the remote, narrow, one-way track that leads to my isolated Plas. 😁
    Good luck. I don't want to run down my no deal stash on a third 2020 all Wales Lockdown, but I fear it may come.
  • alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    I am not the least excited and the fire break as a one off solution as promoted by Drakeford was a mistake
    The people who deserve to be castigated are those who came up with the name 'circuit breaker' ** which gives the impression that it permanently stops the spread.

    If I was Drakeford I would apologise and say that I followed scientific advice but it turned out the scientific advice was crap.

    ** Generally its always wise to be wary of things with catchy but stupid names.
    Drakeford called it a firebreak.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,828

    If the MHRA (and, for belt and braces) either the FDA or the EMA are happy with the Oxford/Zeneca then I’ll have it. And ASAP. Otherwise I feel that there are are odd clouds hanging over it.
    Obviously a working vaccine is the answer and we all need it, as I said, ASAP.
    I don’t any Govt has covered itself with glory over coronavirus.

    Do you not trust the MHRA alone or something?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,460
    edited November 2020
    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    That isn't alone a definition of success. Of course numbers go down with any lockdown, but If your lockdown doesn't squash down infections far enough, it will quickly come back regardless of some restrictions post lockdown. Second, also concentration. We know Wales has two big hotspots, I don't believe 2.weeks was anywhere near long enough to tackle those two areas.

    The fact Wales R is back to 1.4 already says they hadn't squashed it enough.

    We have hotspots in England where months haven't been long enough.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344
    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    Malc you’re taking me back to Practical Dispensing, in college 60+ years ago. Wonder how I’d have formulated that!
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,269
    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/coronavirus-landlords-fear-the-social-cost-of-turning-off-their-taps-f8h709wcs

    “As an industry, we feel we’ve done everything the government has asked of us and they’ve effectively thrown us under a bus. Either they don’t understand the industry or they’re trading us off against other parts of the economy, which would be OK if the financial support was there.”
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    To be honest, post "fire break" it has been a free for all. Drakeford foolishly called the lockdown before the Conservative Party were on board with it, and failed to recant his promise that it would end after seventeen days.

    Andrew Neil should like it here post fire-break. It's been just like Sweden!
  • Yup, the story has that correction.

    But the broad scope of the tweet is right.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    That isn't alone a definition of success. Of course numbers go down with any lockdown, but If your lockdown doesn't squash down infections far enough, it will quickly come back regardless of some restrictions post lockdown. Second, also concentration. We know Wales has two big hotspots, I don't believe 2.weeks was anywhere near long enough to tackle those two areas.

    The fact Wales R is back to 1.4 already says they hadn't squashed it enough.

    We have hotspots in England where months haven't been long enough.
    Fair points.

    (Btw, I've seen the 1.4 number as well, and wonder what that's based on? The case numbers don't look quite that bad. At a week's incubation period, R=1.4 implies a doubling time of two weeks, I think?)
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,460
    edited November 2020
    Covid restrictions seems to be the new Europe issue for the Tory party....

    100 Tory MPs prepare to rebel against Tiers after admission that indoor socialising ban could last until EASTER

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8995941/Coronavirus-UK-Anti-lockdown-protestor-bursts-tears-police-arrest-him.html
  • MonkeysMonkeys Posts: 757
    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    Is Gove putting a Union Jack on it?
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848
    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
  • Gaussian said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    That isn't alone a definition of success. Of course numbers go down with any lockdown, but If your lockdown doesn't squash down infections far enough, it will quickly come back regardless of some restrictions post lockdown. Second, also concentration. We know Wales has two big hotspots, I don't believe 2.weeks was anywhere near long enough to tackle those two areas.

    The fact Wales R is back to 1.4 already says they hadn't squashed it enough.

    We have hotspots in England where months haven't been long enough.
    Fair points.

    (Btw, I've seen the 1.4 number as well, and wonder what that's based on? The case numbers don't look quite that bad. At a week's incubation period, R=1.4 implies a doubling time of two weeks, I think?)
    Drakeford said it was at a press conference.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 21,965
    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    If England had locked down at the same time a lot of people wouldn't have caught the virus.

    But Bozo and Coco thought they knew better.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Yup, the story has that correction.

    But the broad scope of the tweet is right.
    No one should be allowed to diss Nippy.

    Joanna Cherry seems to represent the Sandinista wing of the SNP.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586

    Gaussian said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did seem to (temporarily) change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    I see no evidence it was a success and as I reported from day 1 of the post lockdown period most everyone went out and about as if covid was over and I did issue warnings that this would have consequences
    The lockdown worked fine. The big downslope on the green line here reflects the lockdown with about 10 days delay. The problem is what happened afterwards.

    image
    That isn't alone a definition of success. Of course numbers go down with any lockdown, but If your lockdown doesn't squash down infections far enough, it will quickly come back regardless of some restrictions post lockdown. Second, also concentration. We know Wales has two big hotspots, I don't believe 2.weeks was anywhere near long enough to tackle those two areas.

    The fact Wales R is back to 1.4 already says they hadn't squashed it enough.

    We have hotspots in England where months haven't been long enough.
    Fair points.

    (Btw, I've seen the 1.4 number as well, and wonder what that's based on? The case numbers don't look quite that bad. At a week's incubation period, R=1.4 implies a doubling time of two weeks, I think?)
    Drakeford said it was at a press conference.
    R calculated from cases data

    image
  • Scott_xP said:
    FFS...u-turn already....and of course the way to keep.covid in check, consistent long term restrictions...but no we can't stick to that.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
  • IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,586

    IshmaelZ said:

    Do vegans think viruses are made of meat?

    No, but they think some of them are tested on animals.
    Aren't some grown on egg extract too?
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Not me, guv. Might be HYUFD.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 21,965

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831
    edited November 2020

    Scott_xP said:
    FFS...u-turn already....and of course the way to keep.covid in check, consistent long term restrictions...but no we can't stick to that.
    It's so irrational. Tiers can go down as well as up, so if any areas were to be fine by then they'd have their restrictions lifted anyway.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Scott_xP said:
    FFS...u-turn already....and of course the way to keep.covid in check, consistent long term restrictions...but no we can't stick to that.
    I feel for Boris here. Like Drakeford, he is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

    However, I would like to see Johnson grow a backbone and tell Steve Baker, Andrew Bridgen and Graham Brady to just **** off!
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    It's amazing where you can ram a neep.
  • Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    I never knew how annoying I was until I created miniature versions of myself and spent a lot of time with them.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Not me, guv. Might be HYUFD.
    Gavin and Stacey?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Not me, guv. Might be HYUFD.
    Gavin and Stacey?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    He's certainly been off channel for mostd of the last thread and this one.
  • Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    Not so much revenge but a weird loosening of propriety; some pals in kilts colliding with a drunken hen party was an eye opener.

    'I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.'
  • OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,589

    Scott_xP said:
    FFS...u-turn already....and of course the way to keep.covid in check, consistent long term restrictions...but no we can't stick to that.
    Nope, because the boorish backbench Tories would rather wank on about "auThORitARiANIsM" without actually knowing what that is. It'll pass because Labour won't want to be responsible for removing all of England's COVID restrictions, but I am genuinely angry at the shitheaddery of the Tory backbenches.

    According to The Times it'll be diabetics who get priority over oldies for the vaccine.

    Turns out being a diabetic does have a bonus.

    Tranche six is the flu jab crew according to the green book, so I'll likely be getting it just after my Grandmother and just before my Dad which is interesting. Can't complain really.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831
    alex_ said:



    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
    Scotland is discussing starting the school holidays early (on the 18th) and finishing them late, to both reduce the chances of taking the virus to Christmas gatherings and passing it on afterwards.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    edited November 2020

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    Not so much revenge but a weird loosening of propriety; some pals in kilts colliding with a drunken hen party was an eye opener.

    'I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.'
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in Weegie rain.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Carnyx said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    He's certainly been off channel for mostd of the last thread and this one.
    The invasion is underway?
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    I never knew how annoying I was until I created miniature versions of myself and spent a lot of time with them.
    how do you know you arent a miniature version of yourself created by a bigger version of yourself?
  • Foxy said:

    Any truth in the rumour that PPE graduates will be in the first tranche for the vaccine?

    After all, we've been hearing how important PPE is for the past 9 months.

    Nailed on that chums of the government are first in the queue. Get out of the way plebs.
    Didn't Bozo get a flu jab the other day. Other over 50s have to wait until December.
    He got one after I did and I’m younger than him.
  • OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,589
    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:



    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
    Scotland is discussing starting the school holidays early (on the 18th) and finishing them late, to both reduce the chances of taking the virus to Christmas gatherings and passing it on afterwards.
    I read that earlier. I think it's a decent idea.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    edited November 2020

    Carnyx said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    He's certainly been off channel for mostd of the last thread and this one.
    The invasion is underway?
    Well, it's not like hgim to be so quiet.

    That reminds me - I forgot to ask @DavidL if he is around, if he can point me to an explanation of the use of English law on treason and IIRC English judges and prosecutors for 'treason' committed in Scotland only in the 1790s and in the 1820 Rising, with trials in Edinburgh. I could never understand this, and the recent discussion of treason and sedition in Scotland has reminded me, so i f DavidL is in a kindly mood ...
  • Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    I never knew how annoying I was until I created miniature versions of myself and spent a lot of time with them.
    how do you know you arent a miniature version of yourself created by a bigger version of yourself?
    Now you've caused me yo have an existential crisis.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    OnboardG1 said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:



    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
    Scotland is discussing starting the school holidays early (on the 18th) and finishing them late, to both reduce the chances of taking the virus to Christmas gatherings and passing it on afterwards.
    I read that earlier. I think it's a decent idea.
    To quote Lord Foulkes: "They're doing it deliberately."
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 21,965

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    Knowing HY's sense of navigation, yes.
  • dodradedodrade Posts: 596

    Scott_xP said:
    FFS...u-turn already....and of course the way to keep.covid in check, consistent long term restrictions...but no we can't stick to that.
    I feel for Boris here. Like Drakeford, he is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

    However, I would like to see Johnson grow a backbone and tell Steve Baker, Andrew Bridgen and Graham Brady to just **** off!
    It's particularly crazy given we probably only have to ride out the winter.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    He risks a £30 level 3 travel restriction fine.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Pagan2 said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    malcolmg said:

    Nigelb said:

    malcolmg said:

    DougSeal said:

    A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 73 per cent of people are likely to take a vaccine if it becomes available on the NHS but only a third would like to be among the first to do so. Almost half said they would prefer to wait until someone else was given it before they took it.

    Twenty-five per cent said they would rather take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine compared with 6 per cent the Pfizer vaccine, 2 per cent the Moderna one and 29 per cent who expressed no preference.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/people-with-diabetes-to-be-prioritised-for-covid-19-vaccine-5829g2css

    Thanks for posting that - esp given you suggested fewer people would be prepared to take the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine the other day. IMHO there remains enough respect for the medical profession in this country that if a GP says he's taken it then patients will generally follow. I may be wrong though.
    I would not be keen on being lumbered with the Oxford vaccine ...
    Don’t they inject in the arm ?
    Sure they will make it into a suppository for Scotland Nigel, a very big one.
    You wear those kilt thingies, what do you expect?
    What is wrong with kilt thingies?
    Nothing, I wear one myself, but they do invite the suppository approach in a way troosers don't.
    The bitter voice of experience?
    I don't think I have ever annoyed people to the point they take to the suppository revenge approach
    I never knew how annoying I was until I created miniature versions of myself and spent a lot of time with them.
    how do you know you arent a miniature version of yourself created by a bigger version of yourself?
    Now you've caused me yo have an existential crisis.
    Will the real TheScreamingEagles please standup
  • TresTres Posts: 2,686

    Yup, the story has that correction.

    But the broad scope of the tweet is right.
    No one should be allowed to diss Nippy.

    Joanna Cherry seems to represent the Sandinista wing of the SNP.
    Sardinista wing shirley?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,828
    .
    Scott_xP said:
    They don't have the numbers to vote it down, so it'll continue anyway.
  • OnboardG1 said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:



    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
    Scotland is discussing starting the school holidays early (on the 18th) and finishing them late, to both reduce the chances of taking the virus to Christmas gatherings and passing it on afterwards.
    I read that earlier. I think it's a decent idea.
    At least one English academy trust suggested the early finish and were told not to by the Westminster government.

    Westminster really doesn't want to admit that the pestilence is transmitted in schools.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344
    RobD said:

    If the MHRA (and, for belt and braces) either the FDA or the EMA are happy with the Oxford/Zeneca then I’ll have it. And ASAP. Otherwise I feel that there are are odd clouds hanging over it.
    Obviously a working vaccine is the answer and we all need it, as I said, ASAP.
    I don’t any Govt has covered itself with glory over coronavirus.

    Do you not trust the MHRA alone or something?
    TBH I don’t trust this Govt not to try to strongarm such organisations. Although in days gone past I knew members of MHRA committees etc and regarded them as incorruptible.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Gaussian said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Many PBTories seem to be getting quite excited at the prospect that we in Wales are all going to succumb to Covid because of Starmer/Drakeford's too early, too short, reckless lockdown, whereas in England you have all been saved by Johnson's genius.

    The figures look patchy everywhere, but indeed seem to be on the rise in lockdown England's shopping paradise (Wales).

    Quite frankly, I'd like us all to survive.
    The problem wasn't the locking down (which wasn't early), but the opening up with few restrictions. Hopefully people are taking things into their own hands and are locking themselves down to some degree before Drakeford officially gets round to it.
    Two weeks was far too short.

    Cardiff, Newport, Cwmbran and McArthur Glen were rammed today with English and Welsh shoppers. Although I had lunch at Gavin Henson's pub today, which was very quiet.
    How do you know these English people aren't now Wales residents? I believe a lot.of English people moved to South Wales corridor from places like Bristol because of cheaper housing and the bridge now being free.
    Breaking News: South Wales turn away cars entering Cardiff, including a convoy of cars from Essex.
    Cars from Essex? Was it HYUFD leading a dozen Hilux with heavy machine guns mounted on the back?
    En route to Edinburgh?
    He risks a £30 level 3 travel restriction fine.
    Another £30 for Treason and Sedition if he fails to overthrow Nippy, might be on the cards.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    OnboardG1 said:

    Gaussian said:

    alex_ said:



    alex_ said:

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Another circuit breaker? I wonder if we will be hearing many politicians bringing that up again?
    My wife and I already have cancelled our family Christmas with 10 of us and will spend it on our own

    Our family completely agree and will also have Christmas on their own with their own children

    And we decided this during the fire break as we had no confidence it would change the covid incidence

    Well it did change the COVID incidence quite significantly to be fair. What was strange is quite the reported (and i'm not claiming to have followed it closely so may just be talking nonsense) extent of the relaxation afterwards. Groups of 15?
    The mistake was three fold...two weeks isn't long enough to really squish down covid, especially when Wales have two areas of extreme rates. Two, you don't know from the data if it has really worked when you finish and in particular which areas you still have a problem. Three, the insistence of going from that to a nationwide relaxation that was far too easy.

    If you notice Witty and Valance report the other day, a month of lockdown in England and they were still using phrases like the trend of the data INDICATES we have turned the corner. Even a month is pushing it to know if it has worked.

    And of course as we pointed out at the time, the model the 2 week idea was based on, utter horseshit. Even by some of the crap modelling work done during this pandemic, it was up there with UoW one in terms of bollockness.
    A problem with any sort of lockdown is that there will be a surge of activity beforehand so the lockdown has to counter the effects of that before it even begins to reduce the original infection rate.
    And was the mistake the UK government made announcing lockdowns and also coming out of lockdown #1. You have to go quickly, to.stop people having their last bender and also going crazy when coming out

    At least this time, we have gone back to tiers which are quite strict. Now the Christmas blow out, thats a different kettle of fish.
    Given the Christmas blowout is happening, an obvious thing to do would be to delay the schools going back by a week (it hardly affects children's education - they could just add a week somewhere else). Over Christmas people will largely be in close knit groups, and delay schools going back and any transfer of infection might stay that way.
    Scotland is discussing starting the school holidays early (on the 18th) and finishing them late, to both reduce the chances of taking the virus to Christmas gatherings and passing it on afterwards.
    I read that earlier. I think it's a decent idea.
    At least one English academy trust suggested the early finish and were told not to by the Westminster government.

    Westminster really doesn't want to admit that the pestilence is transmitted in schools.
    Probably not too much in primary schools, unless parents ignore distancing, but at least the older years in secondary schools must be a vector.
  • LadyGLadyG Posts: 2,221

    alex_ said:

    Is Wales going to have to cancel their Christmas?

    Nah, the Welsh are used to losing to England, cancelling Christmas would be a staggering overreaction.
    England look relentlessly formidable. France will be a good test tho.

    Far too much kicking in that Welsh game, given that both sides have brilliant speedy backs
This discussion has been closed.