Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

My tip for the US election 2024: Pete Buttigieg at 50/1 – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,169
edited November 2020 in General
imageMy tip for the US election 2024: Pete Buttigieg at 50/1 – politicalbetting.com

2020 is all over bar the shouting, though there’ll be plenty of that yet. The next two and a half months may not be pretty but their essential course is set: Joe Biden will become president of the United States on 20 January next year. He may not quite be assured of victory in any of the outstanding states but he’s favourite – very strong favourite in some – to take Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and Pennsylvania. That final state would be enough to see him over the line by itself, as would any two of the other three. That seems all but certain.

Read the full story here

«13456789

Comments

  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited November 2020
    If you bet with Ladbrokes click on the odds boost button and you will get 60/1
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,209
    Also, buy Tom Cotton. He's an articulate, sane version of Trump.
  • You say Kamala Harris was disappointing in the primaries but we must remember Joe Biden himself failed in two primary campaigns yet here he is, or will be if they can get the other guy to leave quietly.

    Pete Buttigieg needs to get some hard yards in because mayor of somewhere smaller than Milton Keynes impresses no-one. However, Donald Trump has shown this does not need to be in politics so if no government role is offered, he could always sign up as a pundit with one of the television networks. He has the charm and fluency needed.
  • rcs1000 said:

    Also, buy Tom Cotton. He's an articulate, sane version of Trump.

    On the GOP side, one dark horse canvassed as a replacement for Pence this year was Kristi Noem, the sometimes controversial governor of South Dakota.
  • Don Jr may be a chip off the old block but was Ivanka out of her depth or is it that she is a RINO (Republican in name only while daddy's in the Oval Office)? Both could be true, I suppose.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited November 2020
    It's a fun bet but I'm not sure I want to tie up the money for 4 years on such a wild punt. But then on 60/1 (boosted with Ladbrokes - see Mike below) I guess it might be worth the long shot.

    Coming back to Pennsylvania and Mike's previous thread, it really is appalling that the Republicans there have deliberately generated instability in this way by refusing to count the mail-ins beforehand. Now you have McCarthy joining Ted Cruz and others in stirring up the Trumpist doubt over the validity of the election.

    The Republican Party deserves to be packed into the wilderness for a decade for this. Whether they will be is another matter. But they certainly should be.

    I only hope the scales fall from people's eyes.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,209

    You say Kamala Harris was disappointing in the primaries but we must remember Joe Biden himself failed in two primary campaigns yet here he is, or will be if they can get the other guy to leave quietly.

    Pete Buttigieg needs to get some hard yards in because mayor of somewhere smaller than Milton Keynes impresses no-one. However, Donald Trump has shown this does not need to be in politics so if no government role is offered, he could always sign up as a pundit with one of the television networks. He has the charm and fluency needed.

    Point of order: Milton Keynes is 34 square miles, South Bend is 42 square miles.

    You may have meant "less populous", of course...
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited November 2020
    More immediately, you can still get 3/1 on Betfair exchange that Joe Biden will poll 52% of the popular vote. This was a tip from Casino Royale yesterday. With a chunk of California still to come, it's a toss-up whether he will get there and you might be throwing away money but the odds look good to me and I'm on.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    p.s. As I'm sure you all know, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has coronavirus
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020
    An excellent header, but I don't agree on Buttigieg. I don't think he has wide enough appeal outside the professional middle-classes, unlike BIden, and also, perhaps more subjectively, as yet another McKinsey alumnus, I don't think he's what America's deep cultural challenges need.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020
    Incidentally, the comparison with Tom Cotton below is very interesting ; on the face of it, he's a raging cultural populist who would offer a bracingly definitive alternative to Buttigieg.

    Appearances, and the apparent diversity of the american political tapestry, can be deceptive, though ; like Buttigieg he's an ex-serviceman who worked for McKinsey at a formative time of his young life.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,209

    An excellent header, but I don't agree on Buttigieg. I don't think he has wide enough appeal outside the professional middle-classes, unlike BIden, and also, perhaps more subjectively, as yet another McKinsey alumnus, I don't think he's what America's deep cultural challenges need.

    Who are the other McKinsey alumni at the top of American politics?
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020
    McKinsey are simply the emblem of elite management consultancy, but the numbers of Americans in public and political life who have worked in the elite part of the sector overall are very significant, as in the UK.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020
    ydoethur said:

    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)

    Interesting that both Harris and Haley are partly Indian. Overall I agree that they could both have unpredictably wide appeal.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    ydoethur said:

    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)

    Interesting that both Harris and Haley are partly Indian. Overall I agree that they could both have unpredictably wide appeal.
    I was thinking more that because their background and gender could not be weaponised against the other, it would likely be a fight on the issues rather than the personalities.

    Also, they both seem to me to be tough and unafraid to say what they think even if it isn’t necessarily what will appeal to their supporters. Harris refused to
    drop prosecutions of some darlings of the Democratic left, while Haley took down that confederate flag.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
  • ydoethur said:

    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)

    Buttigieg has never contested an election in Texas. He was mayor of South Bend Indiana. My guess is that you were thinking of Beto O'Rourke
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    ydoethur said:

    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)

    Buttigieg has never contested an election in Texas. He was mayor of South Bend Indiana. My guess is that you were thinking of Beto O'Rourke
    You’re quite right, my apologies. Too early and not enough coffee.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Buttigieg is great, but it’s hard to see him as president. I could see him as sec of state or defence sec. I don’t think he currently has quite the gravitas you need to run and win. Maybe that will come with age.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    It would also help if his surname didn’t sound like Butt Cheek. But he is a star, just needs hardening a bit.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Just had a flick through the last thread. I think Donald Junior might be even more chilling than the man himself. I'd always thought Ivanka and Jarred would fit most comfortably into any remake of The Addams Family but now I'd give it Don Junior.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Roger said:

    Just had a flick through the last thread. I think Donald Junior might be even more chilling than the man himself. I'd always thought Ivanka and Jarred would fit most comfortably into any remake of The Addams Family but now I'd give it Don Junior.

    Are you arguing that Don Snr should not fight to the death? Trumps aggrieved niece was arguing on Ch4 that the next few weeks were dangerous for the world as the president facing unavoidable defeat might try to drag us all down with him.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020
    He's definitely shrewd and bright, and could develop more presence with age, but I'm not sure that he's the kind of politician that America is going to go for in the future. In the 1990s and the Clinton era, I think his future as a candidate might have been almost guaranteed, but in a match-up with someone like Tom Cotton, as mentioned below, and despite their actual parallels in background, I think he might not do too well.
  • At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Jonathan said:

    Buttigieg is great, but it’s hard to see him as president. I could see him as sec of state or defence sec. I don’t think he currently has quite the gravitas you need to run and win. Maybe that will come with age.

    That is another good point. Do we have any steers as to possible Biden cabinet picks? I haven’t seen any yet.

    One thing Biden would be wise to do - and with hindsight it’s one of Obama’s biggest mistakes that he didn’t do this - is bring on some young talent in executive roles. For example, he should probably be looking to have a Secretary of State in at most their early fifties, and people at Defence and Homeland Security in their late forties. That would allow a new generation to get some experience and build a profile. Think how different life would be if there had been a younger Secretary of State for Obama’s second term rather than he admittedly excellent but also rather elderly John Kerry.

    For Buttigieg, if he’s got any sense he’ll be angling for Haley’s old role at the UN. Easy way to build a profile at home and abroad while maintaining a discreet distance from an administration that will undoubtedly have tough choices to make. Also, would give him lots of exposure to foreign affairs with limited opportunities for disasters caused by inexperience.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited November 2020
    rcs1000 said:

    Also, buy Tom Cotton. He's an articulate, sane version of Trump.

    His is the real danger man. He's the bland face of evil that a whole bunch of #NeverTrumpers would happily vote for.

    The problem for many nevertrumpers was not the policies just the amount of shouting and insults thrown as they were implemented.

    Cotton gives them enough of a facade to vote for.
  • JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 682
    Absolute nonsense. 50/1 tip !! my Aunt Fanny ....

    Who on PB has ever tipped a correct 50/1 candidate for POTUS !!! .... :astonished:

    :smiley:
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:

    Just had a flick through the last thread. I think Donald Junior might be even more chilling than the man himself. I'd always thought Ivanka and Jarred would fit most comfortably into any remake of The Addams Family but now I'd give it Don Junior.

    Are you arguing that Don Snr should not fight to the death? Trumps aggrieved niece was arguing on Ch4 that the next few weeks were dangerous for the world as the president facing unavoidable defeat might try to drag us all down with him.
    Her actual words were 'He's President for the next 76 days. If he goes he's going to take the rest of us down with him'. I'd put her down for Morticia.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
    Joe looks in better shape than most twenty years his junior.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,209

    ydoethur said:

    An interesting header, thank you. I had also been thinking of Buttigieg, but I think partly due to name recognition after his performance in Texas a couple of years back.

    The other one who seems much too long in the price to me is Gretchen Whitmer at 100/1. She must have been considered as Biden’s running mate and she has both name recognition and significant political experience.

    But I think it will be moot, as it will be Harris, probably as incumbent (I can see Joe Biden doing a Benedict and announcing on his eightieth birthday that he just can’t manage any more).

    Harris v Haley would be an interesting contest, and possibly the contest America needs. Whether the Republican base will be willing to listen to the truths Haley will undoubtedly tell them is another question.

    (Incidentally when I go back over one-term elected Presidents declining to seek re-election, I come up with Hayes, 1877-81, who actually ran on a pledge to serve only one term.)

    Buttigieg has never contested an election in Texas. He was mayor of South Bend Indiana. My guess is that you were thinking of Beto O'Rourke
    Do you have any evidence that he has never contested an election in Texas?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:

    Just had a flick through the last thread. I think Donald Junior might be even more chilling than the man himself. I'd always thought Ivanka and Jarred would fit most comfortably into any remake of The Addams Family but now I'd give it Don Junior.

    Are you arguing that Don Snr should not fight to the death? Trumps aggrieved niece was arguing on Ch4 that the next few weeks were dangerous for the world as the president facing unavoidable defeat might try to drag us all down with him.
    Well, that is a bit of a worry. Which is one reason why Pence’s recent actions have been quite suggestive.

    There was an order issued by the Secretary of Defense in Nixon’s dog days, when he was very depressed and permanently drunk, that any order to launch nuclear weapons should be double checked with Henry Kissinger. The complicating factor however at the time was that there was no Vice President and Kissinger could hardly invoke the 25th to hand power to Carl Albert.

    So hopefully before we get to that stage Pence would have acted.

    The safety of the world potentially resting on Mike Pence is admittedly disturbing, but it would only be for a short while.
  • Biden has drifted to 1.08 on Betfair. Has anything happened or is this simply what I forecast yesterday, that punters would want to free up funds for betting on other events?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    JACK_W said:

    Absolute nonsense. 50/1 tip !! my Aunt Fanny ....

    Who on PB has ever tipped a correct 50/1 candidate for POTUS !!! .... :astonished:

    :smiley:

    Is your Aunt Fanny eligible, Your Grace?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I have channelled the spirit of Cromwell and put a tenner on Marco Rubio for the nomination.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I, of course, backed Cotton ages ago when I first tipped him.
  • Biden has drifted to 1.08 on Betfair. Has anything happened or is this simply what I forecast yesterday, that punters would want to free up funds for betting on other events?

    People realising this is going to the supreme court?

    Trumps claim would be 100,000/1 on merit.

    What price are you willing to back Kavanaugh et al rule on merit? Many here are very confident they will put country and the law ahead of partisanship, but I wont be backing them doing that at just over 90%.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,463

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
    Joe looks in better shape than most twenty years his junior.
    Generally speaking I'm fitter now, at 82 than I was at 78. And, AFAIK, Joe hasn't got the health issues I had then!
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,001

  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    'Am articulate sane version of Trump' is an interesting concept

    Another one that reminds me of 'How Green were the Nazis?"
  • Biden has drifted to 1.08 on Betfair. Has anything happened or is this simply what I forecast yesterday, that punters would want to free up funds for betting on other events?

    People realising this is going to the supreme court?

    Trumps claim would be 100,000/1 on merit.

    What price are you willing to back Kavanaugh et al rule on merit? Many here are very confident they will put country and the law ahead of partisanship, but I wont be backing them doing that at just over 90%.
    Biden touched 1.1 but is now back in to 1.07; I was waiting till he reached 50/1 before tipping him in a far-sighted pb header.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,463
    I wonder how we'll look back on these few days in a year or so?
  • Roger said:

    'Am articulate sane version of Trump' is an interesting concept

    Another one that reminds me of 'How Green were the Nazis?"

    Good point, articulate version is fine, sane version is impossible. Trumpism is based on imagining the world how you want it and using your power to make the facts match your desired world. It is an insane but effective and powerful world view - religions are similar in many ways.

    It is also why he will not only never concede but will genuinely believe he has won the election despite all the real facts clearly showing he has lost. The alternative imagined facts are in his favour, and the only reason he is not declared the winner is his enemies dont accept them.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,165
    edited November 2020

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
    Joe looks in better shape than most twenty years his junior.
    Generally speaking I'm fitter now, at 82 than I was at 78. And, AFAIK, Joe hasn't got the health issues I had then!
    My aunt is also in better condition at 85 than she was at 80, having got over an illness. I also have an acquaintance who drives his son down to Brighton every weekend, or did do before the lockdown this week. He is in his early 90's and his son is 65.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,833
    edited November 2020

    I wonder how we'll look back on these few days in a year or so?

    Wishing they had finished the counting by then?
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    I wonder how we'll look back on these few days in a year or so?

    A bit of a fuss about nothing.

    In a few days the result will be conclusive to everyone except the inner Trump cabal and they will gradually crumble to leave Trump & sons (I wouldn't bet against Melania breaking).

    Oh he'll whinge and claim fraud until his dying breath. It's the only way he can avoid the painful truth that he lost.

    The narrative will have moved on. People want to be on the winning side.

    The real question is where does the GOP go from here? Will those who sided with Trump to the last be ostracized, which is my likeliest scenario? Will the party find its moderate voice? Will they see sense before they damage their hopes in the Georgia run-offs? Or will the hard edge win out for a while albeit without their talismanic leader?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713
    Some interesting tips, but I think it will be Harris.

    I think Kamala will be president before the 2024 election, with Grandpa Joe stepping down gracefully. He has stated that he sees himself as a bridge to a new generation, and doesn't seem driven by personal ambition.

    I expect Joe to appoint a fairly centrist cabinet, of people not motivated by culture war. There are plenty in the Democrat party, and that will suit his desire for bipartisan working. Bipartisanship will be needed to get things through the Senate, and confrontation minimised. There is a lot of work to do.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Oh, I see Nevada may well hit the 2% margin I predicted.

    Nice
  • MetatronMetatron Posts: 193
    Surely any viable female will be the preference over Buttigieg as the electorate will believe it is time for a female president assuming Harris is not already president.Nikki Haley is likely to be the Republican frontrunner
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    edited November 2020
    Foxy said:

    Some interesting tips, but I think it will be Harris.

    I think Kamala will be president before the 2024 election, with Grandpa Joe stepping down gracefully. He has stated that he sees himself as a bridge to a new generation, and doesn't seem driven by personal ambition.

    I expect Joe to appoint a fairly centrist cabinet, of people not motivated by culture war. There are plenty in the Democrat party, and that will suit his desire for bipartisan working. Bipartisanship will be needed to get things through the Senate, and confrontation minimised. There is a lot of work to do.

    Yes, Kamala will have first dibs, and indeed may well be in office.

    Further, in the aftermath (and indeed remains of) the pandemic, there's a significant chance of a Republican recovery, assuming they can move away from crazy. Kamala could be in the unusual position of pitching to remain in the WH yet for the electors being a first time candidate.

    If BFE had a market, I'd be looking to lay Biden and otherwise sit and wait.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Foxy said:

    Some interesting tips, but I think it will be Harris.

    I think Kamala will be president before the 2024 election, with Grandpa Joe stepping down gracefully. He has stated that he sees himself as a bridge to a new generation, and doesn't seem driven by personal ambition.

    I expect Joe to appoint a fairly centrist cabinet, of people not motivated by culture war. There are plenty in the Democrat party, and that will suit his desire for bipartisan working. Bipartisanship will be needed to get things through the Senate, and confrontation minimised. There is a lot of work to do.

    The White House is seductive. Presidents get sucked in. If Biden is well and has a chance of winning he will stand again. Look at FDR.
  • JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 682
    GA just moved to Biden +7,248
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Metatron said:

    Surely any viable female will be the preference over Buttigieg as the electorate will believe it is time for a female president assuming Harris is not already president.Nikki Haley is likely to be the Republican frontrunner

    An all female Harris v. Trump election.
  • Metatron said:

    Surely any viable female will be the preference over Buttigieg as the electorate will believe it is time for a female president assuming Harris is not already president.Nikki Haley is likely to be the Republican frontrunner

    What evidence do you have for the assertion the electorate will believe that? Maybe they should believe it, but many Democrats are scared that a woman does put off a tiny % of voters and we have seen how tight US elections are once again.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
    Joe looks in better shape than most twenty years his junior.
    Generally speaking I'm fitter now, at 82 than I was at 78. And, AFAIK, Joe hasn't got the health issues I had then!
    My aunt is also in better condition at 85 than she was at 80, having got over an illness. I also have an acquaintance who drives his son down to Brighton every weekend, or did do before the lockdown this week. He is in his early 90's and his son is 65.
    OMG, how many driving lessons does his son need??
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,205
    Alistair said:

    Oh, I see Nevada may well hit the 2% margin I predicted.

    Nice

    Remaining Philadelphia vote should be more pro Biden than previous, Wasserman reckons the Trump friendly precincts are more through.
  • Jonathan said:

    Foxy said:

    Some interesting tips, but I think it will be Harris.

    I think Kamala will be president before the 2024 election, with Grandpa Joe stepping down gracefully. He has stated that he sees himself as a bridge to a new generation, and doesn't seem driven by personal ambition.

    I expect Joe to appoint a fairly centrist cabinet, of people not motivated by culture war. There are plenty in the Democrat party, and that will suit his desire for bipartisan working. Bipartisanship will be needed to get things through the Senate, and confrontation minimised. There is a lot of work to do.

    The White House is seductive. Presidents get sucked in. If Biden is well and has a chance of winning he will stand again. Look at FDR.
    Look at Tyson v Jones. People like to carry on.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    https://twitter.com/Brand_Allen/status/1324975504877899776?s=19

    That's a 0.5 lead. NBC will call it soon
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    I wonder how we'll look back on these few days in a year or so?

    In time it will turn into one of those curiosities that only PB'ers remember, like Bush-Gore and the chads
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    For me it’s very hard to see past Harris who is very likely to be in position by 2024 as a serving President. Whilst this agree that she was a disappointment as a candidate she will be in a totally different position. Being President is seriously hard and ages people. Biden starts off with low reserves of intellect and coherence. His greatest success as President is very likely to have been achieved already, the removal of Donald Trump. Don’t be too surprised if it is downhill from here.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    p.s. As I'm sure you all know, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has coronavirus

    Not one for conspiracies, but that’s convenient.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    ydoethur said:

    Jonathan said:

    Buttigieg is great, but it’s hard to see him as president. I could see him as sec of state or defence sec. I don’t think he currently has quite the gravitas you need to run and win. Maybe that will come with age.

    That is another good point. Do we have any steers as to possible Biden cabinet picks? I haven’t seen any yet.

    One thing Biden would be wise to do - and with hindsight it’s one of Obama’s biggest mistakes that he didn’t do this - is bring on some young talent in executive roles. For example, he should probably be looking to have a Secretary of State in at most their early fifties, and people at Defence and Homeland Security in their late forties. That would allow a new generation to get some experience and build a profile. Think how different life would be if there had been a younger Secretary of State for Obama’s second term rather than he admittedly excellent but also rather elderly John Kerry.

    For Buttigieg, if he’s got any sense he’ll be angling for Haley’s old role at the UN. Easy way to build a profile at home and abroad while maintaining a discreet distance from an administration that will undoubtedly have tough choices to make. Also, would give him lots of exposure to foreign affairs with limited opportunities for disasters caused by inexperience.
    There's a woman apparently favourite for defence
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,005
    Just imagine if they’d counted all the postal ballots first, ahead of time. We’d have had massive blue leads all over the place, and then Trump remorselessly gaining in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and getting to spitting distance in a couple of them.

    That would have been quite exciting as well.
  • Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Its not that mad, Obama offered 3 cabinet positions to Republicans, 2 accepted.

    Even Trump had Michael Flynn and Gary Cohn as Democrats. Jared Kushner was a registered Democrat pre the 2016 election as well.

    I think its extremely likely Biden offers at least one cabinet level job to a republican, probably 3.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675

    Just imagine if they’d counted all the postal ballots first, ahead of time. We’d have had massive blue leads all over the place, and then Trump remorselessly gaining in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and getting to spitting distance in a couple of them.

    That would have been quite exciting as well.

    Good point. It’s no less controversial that way around. Arguably it’s worse.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    JACK_W said:

    GA just moved to Biden +7,248


    Suspect the next wild claim from Trump is going to be that somebody tampered with the military votes. Because the military should* all love him, right?


    *in his deranged mind
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    edited November 2020

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Its not that mad, Obama offered 3 cabinet positions to Republicans, 2 accepted.

    Even Trump had Michael Flynn and Gary Cohn as Democrats. Jared Kushner was a registered Democrat pre the 2016 election as well.

    I think its extremely likely Biden offers at least one cabinet level job to a republican, probably 3.
    But a Trump republican? He owes the Lincoln project republicans a lot of favours. But that’s almost a different party.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Its not that mad, Obama offered 3 cabinet positions to Republicans, 2 accepted.

    Even Trump had Michael Flynn and Gary Cohn as Democrats. Jared Kushner was a registered Democrat pre the 2016 election as well.

    I think its extremely likely Biden offers at least one cabinet level job to a republican, probably 3.
    Republicans yes. Trumpists, not a chance.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713

    At risk of offending the PB taste police, we should ask if Kamala Harris might already be President in 2024. That would make a successful primary challenge less likely, or even an unsuccessful one.

    Taste Police offended!
    Betting value police waiting for market on Biden to last 4 years as President, I am a very likely backer without even seeing the price, purely as "everyone" is assuming he wont. He is 78 and very fit, not 98.
    Joe looks in better shape than most twenty years his junior.
    Generally speaking I'm fitter now, at 82 than I was at 78. And, AFAIK, Joe hasn't got the health issues I had then!
    My aunt is also in better condition at 85 than she was at 80, having got over an illness. I also have an acquaintance who drives his son down to Brighton every weekend, or did do before the lockdown this week. He is in his early 90's and his son is 65.
    Yes, but none of these have the gruelling day job of being President. Power and responsibility ages people.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    edited November 2020
    I wonder what kind of deal Biden could offer Trump to get a smooth transition. I am sure Trumps ego is searching for some face saving way out of this, Offering some kind of deal might flatter that ego and move thins along in way that is worth it.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Pulpstar said:

    Alistair said:

    Oh, I see Nevada may well hit the 2% margin I predicted.

    Nice

    Remaining Philadelphia vote should be more pro Biden than previous, Wasserman reckons the Trump friendly precincts are more through.
    Trump winning Beaver....
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713

    Just imagine if they’d counted all the postal ballots first, ahead of time. We’d have had massive blue leads all over the place, and then Trump remorselessly gaining in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and getting to spitting distance in a couple of them.

    That would have been quite exciting as well.

    Just imagine if we had running totals on election night, with postal being counted either earlier or later, rather than a simple final declaration. I would expect a few eyebrows raised that way too.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    Some interesting tips, but I think it will be Harris.

    I think Kamala will be president before the 2024 election, with Grandpa Joe stepping down gracefully. He has stated that he sees himself as a bridge to a new generation, and doesn't seem driven by personal ambition.

    I expect Joe to appoint a fairly centrist cabinet, of people not motivated by culture war. There are plenty in the Democrat party, and that will suit his desire for bipartisan working. Bipartisanship will be needed to get things through the Senate, and confrontation minimised. There is a lot of work to do.

    Yes, Kamala will have first dibs, and indeed may well be in office.

    Further, in the aftermath (and indeed remains of) the pandemic, there's a significant chance of a Republican recovery, assuming they can move away from crazy. Kamala could be in the unusual position of pitching to remain in the WH yet for the electors being a first time candidate.

    If BFE had a market, I'd be looking to lay Biden and otherwise sit and wait.
    It’s not that unusual. It’s happened three times since the war - 1948, 1964 and 1976.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Jonathan said:

    Buttigieg is great, but it’s hard to see him as president. I could see him as sec of state or defence sec. I don’t think he currently has quite the gravitas you need to run and win. Maybe that will come with age.

    That is another good point. Do we have any steers as to possible Biden cabinet picks? I haven’t seen any yet.

    One thing Biden would be wise to do - and with hindsight it’s one of Obama’s biggest mistakes that he didn’t do this - is bring on some young talent in executive roles. For example, he should probably be looking to have a Secretary of State in at most their early fifties, and people at Defence and Homeland Security in their late forties. That would allow a new generation to get some experience and build a profile. Think how different life would be if there had been a younger Secretary of State for Obama’s second term rather than he admittedly excellent but also rather elderly John Kerry.

    For Buttigieg, if he’s got any sense he’ll be angling for Haley’s old role at the UN. Easy way to build a profile at home and abroad while maintaining a discreet distance from an administration that will undoubtedly have tough choices to make. Also, would give him lots of exposure to foreign affairs with limited opportunities for disasters caused by inexperience.
    There's a woman apparently favourite for defence
    Any particular woman or just some person with a vagina?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Foxy said:

    Just imagine if they’d counted all the postal ballots first, ahead of time. We’d have had massive blue leads all over the place, and then Trump remorselessly gaining in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and getting to spitting distance in a couple of them.

    That would have been quite exciting as well.

    Just imagine if we had running totals on election night, with postal being counted either earlier or later, rather than a simple final declaration. I would expect a few eyebrows raised that way too.
    Good point - with a mixed pile and some random fluctuation it would swing back and forth and no-one would have any clues as to where it might finish. The US elections have added interest because the votes are counted for small sub-divisions of the actual constituencies.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713
    Roger said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Alistair said:

    Oh, I see Nevada may well hit the 2% margin I predicted.

    Nice

    Remaining Philadelphia vote should be more pro Biden than previous, Wasserman reckons the Trump friendly precincts are more through.
    Trump winning Beaver....
    Has he just grabbed it?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
    Biden will need some form of political and economic approach to bridge the schism. Roping in some Trump people is one way to do it.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    edited November 2020
    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP. Or AOC who starts with Bernie's 1/3 of the party, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,398

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP or AOC who inherits Bernie's vote, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    Worse I really do think that by 2024 comes along Harris will be running as the incumbent President which would make it fairly unlikely anyone running a as in St her will get far.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP. Or AOC who starts with Bernie's 1/3 of the party, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    That very much reflects my thinking. I also suspect that the AOC set are going to be disappointed by a moderate Biden who will have few ambitions other than trying to keep the show on the road (which, in fairness, is going to be tricky enough).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    ydoethur said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Jonathan said:

    Buttigieg is great, but it’s hard to see him as president. I could see him as sec of state or defence sec. I don’t think he currently has quite the gravitas you need to run and win. Maybe that will come with age.

    That is another good point. Do we have any steers as to possible Biden cabinet picks? I haven’t seen any yet.

    One thing Biden would be wise to do - and with hindsight it’s one of Obama’s biggest mistakes that he didn’t do this - is bring on some young talent in executive roles. For example, he should probably be looking to have a Secretary of State in at most their early fifties, and people at Defence and Homeland Security in their late forties. That would allow a new generation to get some experience and build a profile. Think how different life would be if there had been a younger Secretary of State for Obama’s second term rather than he admittedly excellent but also rather elderly John Kerry.

    For Buttigieg, if he’s got any sense he’ll be angling for Haley’s old role at the UN. Easy way to build a profile at home and abroad while maintaining a discreet distance from an administration that will undoubtedly have tough choices to make. Also, would give him lots of exposure to foreign affairs with limited opportunities for disasters caused by inexperience.
    There's a woman apparently favourite for defence
    Any particular woman or just some person with a vagina?
    Susan Rice. Temporary memory fade.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    edited November 2020
    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
    Pull the other one!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP. Or AOC who starts with Bernie's 1/3 of the party, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    AOC has real charisma, but a bit too fresh out of the box still.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    eek said:

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP or AOC who inherits Bernie's vote, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    Worse I really do think that by 2024 comes along Harris will be running as the incumbent President which would make it fairly unlikely anyone running a as in St her will get far.
    Depends how long and how it is going really.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    On topic, I think the title of the lead is wrong. Sometimes it is too early.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    Where are those numbers in GA published @JackW ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    edited November 2020
    ..
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    Foxy said:

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP. Or AOC who starts with Bernie's 1/3 of the party, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    AOC has real charisma, but a bit too fresh out of the box still.
    Yes, we should give it another 40 years by recent standards.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    Okay CNN has got them! Very quick @JackW
  • From the article: "It’s a long time since any one-term US president declined to seek re-election – you have to go back into the 19th century (the precise instance is definitional)"

    You only need to go back to LBJ in 1968 don't you? It's definitional as David says, but he served out the end of Kennedy's term and had just one term of his own, declining to go for re-election in 1968 as the Vietnam War worsened his prospects.

    On successor to Biden if he serves just one term, I think if Biden did only serve one term, Harris would be hard to beat. It's true that she didn't break through in the primaries, but did have a "moment" which didn't quite turn into more than that, and did better than most in a very crowded field. Further, if Biden is thinking of leaving it at one term, then the VP is the person he's grooming for the job - it's an extremely powerful position from which to campaign.

    Buttigieg remains extremely young for a Presidential candidate, and would only be 50 (young in Presidential terms) if Biden served one term AND Harris served two. His sexuality is more of a problem for his political career in the US than it would be here in Europe... but that only gets easier over time as generations change. Finally, he does have a real problem with black voters and the left of the party that may prove tough a tough nut to crack for him.

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713
    Jonathan said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
    Biden will need some form of political and economic approach to bridge the schism. Roping in some Trump people is one way to do it.
    Trumpism is dead. Someone else needs to pick up the mantle of the nakedly greedy and self serving.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Foxy said:

    Jonathan said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
    Biden will need some form of political and economic approach to bridge the schism. Roping in some Trump people is one way to do it.
    Trumpism is dead. Someone else needs to pick up the mantle of the nakedly greedy and self serving.
    Jarred's Dad.....
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,205
    This is ~ a combo of say Evens Dems to win the next election, then 25-1 for Buttigieg to get past Biden AND Harris ?

    I think it's too skinny personally
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Foxy said:

    Jonathan said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Mad idea. For unity’s sake, I wonder could Biden appoint a republican or Trump supporter in his white house? It might be one way to bridge the divide. Could he even ask Ivanka to do something?

    Ivanka! Are you serious?
    Ivanka would surely be an improvement on a wanker.
    Biden will need some form of political and economic approach to bridge the schism. Roping in some Trump people is one way to do it.
    Trumpism is dead. Someone else needs to pick up the mantle of the nakedly greedy and self serving.
    Trumpism is not dead. Sorry.
  • Mal557Mal557 Posts: 662
    Morning all, woke up to still no calling of the election, no suprise there. My one big concern is that though I totally understand networks etc want to be fully confident of a call, the longer this drags on the more Trump and his allies can feed into this narrative of fraud, cheating, etc
    Millions of his followers will each hour be getting a growing sense of injustice, fuelled by Trumps own words and lies The longer this stretches out the deeper the resentment and the more a huge part of the electorate and a volatile part at that will refuse to accept it.
    Worrying times ahead I feel
  • Foxy said:

    On topic 50/1 isn't bad but I don't understand how he gets past Kamala. To get experience he has to be in the administration, so he can't run *against* the administration, which puts him in the same lane as Kamala. But she's the next in line, and she brings a gender that feels they're owed after Hillary, so where's the opening?

    To run against Kamala I think you need to come from a different angle than continuity Biden, and being a woman neutralizes the gender gap, so consider Stacey Abrams who did more for Biden's victory than his own VP. Or AOC who starts with Bernie's 1/3 of the party, and brings youth and charisma and social media skills.

    AOC has real charisma, but a bit too fresh out of the box still.
    That's what they said about Obama, I think you can turn it into an asset if you're offering a change from something old and dull.
This discussion has been closed.