Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A tale of twelve cities. The perplexing underperformance of Br

13»

Comments

  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    "our massive internal market" ??

    It's not really 'massive' compared to the EU, USA, China, India or Japan is it?

    In what way is it massive?
    Jesus wept, reality is going to be painful for the likes of Mortimer
  • Options
    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    speedy2 said:

    Biden's campaign is going down the toilet at the moment, John Kerry (who is supporting Biden) is considering joining the race as a candidate of his own to try to stop Bernie Sanders:
    https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1224078785332633600
    That's not a vote of confidence for Biden.

    https://twitter.com/mviser/status/1224089860547522567?s=19
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,008
    CatMan said:
    They have, and it’s got nothing to do with the fact that smoking cannabis causes lifelong mental illness and a great percentage of mass killers and terrorists were users.

    The scary thing is that these people weren’t under the influence of it at the time, the damage was done previously
  • Options
    Alistair said:

    speedy2 said:

    Biden's campaign is going down the toilet at the moment, John Kerry (who is supporting Biden) is considering joining the race as a candidate of his own to try to stop Bernie Sanders:
    https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1224078785332633600
    That's not a vote of confidence for Biden.

    https://twitter.com/mviser/status/1224089860547522567?s=19
    WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Options
    MJWMJW Posts: 1,387

    Britain‘s problem is that it doesn’t really have a 2nd City. There is no equivalent of Marseilles, Frankfurt, Milan etc to counterbalance London in a meaningful way. The likes of Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow are “3rd cities” really

    Many would argue that this is directly due to post-war policy that has seen power centered in London. The UK is now one of the most centralised major economies in the world, it wasn't like that when those cities were booming in 19th Century.

    I mean you say Manchester is a "3rd city" but its metro is larger than either Marseilles or Lyon. It economically underperforms both, but then for most infrastructure spending it is entirely dependant on central government to decide what is spent (usually nothing).

    This does not happen in other developed countries.
    The distance between Liverpool and Leeds (and Sheffield, but the Pennines are in the way) is roughly the same as the diameter of Greater London if you include its satellite towns - with Manchester and its airport slap bang in the middle. If you could spend to link up those three, offer tax incentives for companies to base themselves there, it would make a pretty good second hub. You've already had tentative moves with Media City and C4 to Leeds, but really needs government to be far more proactive. If I were Boris it's where I'd be focusing my love of vaguely fantastical projects.
  • Options

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    "our massive internal market" ??

    It's not really 'massive' compared to the EU, USA, China, India or Japan is it?

    In what way is it massive?
    Jesus wept, reality is going to be painful for the likes of Mortimer
    Nissan's plan surely depends on a lot of people wanting to buy their eyesores products. An increase of 500-600% is.... errr.. optimistic?
  • Options

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    "our massive internal market" ??

    It's not really 'massive' compared to the EU, USA, China, India or Japan is it?

    In what way is it massive?
    It's in the worlds top half a dozen markets in the entire globe. That's still massive.
  • Options
    isam said:

    CatMan said:
    They have, and it’s got nothing to do with the fact that smoking cannabis causes lifelong mental illness and a great percentage of mass killers and terrorists were users.

    The scary thing is that these people weren’t under the influence of it at the time, the damage was done previously
    All the more reason to recognise prohibition has failed and didn't prevent this damage.
  • Options
    Dura_Ace said:

    We are an independent, free trading, seafaring nation. We've just returned to the norm.

    We aren't a seafaring nation any longer. About 2.something% of tonnage is carried on British flagged ships and only a small proportion of the crew of those would be British.

    Maybe Johnson is planning to restore the Red Ensign to its former glory with a massive program of merchant shipbuilding on the Clyde, Mersey and Tyne. They will be needed to bring this year's record jute harvest from Calcutta to Dundee. It's definitely the type of shit he would bore on about though less so the type of thing he would actually do.
    :+1:
  • Options

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    "our massive internal market" ??

    It's not really 'massive' compared to the EU, USA, China, India or Japan is it?

    In what way is it massive?
    Jesus wept, reality is going to be painful for the likes of Mortimer
    Nissan's plan surely depends on a lot of people wanting to buy their eyesores products. An increase of 500-600% is.... errr.. optimistic?

    A quick read of the FT piece seems to be saying there is a plan. Not, the plan, but a plan. Large businesses must drawn up strategies and plans all the time.

    the quote from Nissan is: "We’ve modelled every possible ramification of Brexit"

  • Options
    NYT:

    "Wuhan Coronavirus Looks Increasingly Like a Pandemic, Experts Say
    Rapidly rising caseloads alarm researchers, who fear the virus may make its way across the globe. But scientists cannot yet predict how many deaths may result."
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    MJW said:

    Britain‘s problem is that it doesn’t really have a 2nd City. There is no equivalent of Marseilles, Frankfurt, Milan etc to counterbalance London in a meaningful way. The likes of Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow are “3rd cities” really

    Many would argue that this is directly due to post-war policy that has seen power centered in London. The UK is now one of the most centralised major economies in the world, it wasn't like that when those cities were booming in 19th Century.

    I mean you say Manchester is a "3rd city" but its metro is larger than either Marseilles or Lyon. It economically underperforms both, but then for most infrastructure spending it is entirely dependant on central government to decide what is spent (usually nothing).

    This does not happen in other developed countries.
    The distance between Liverpool and Leeds (and Sheffield, but the Pennines are in the way) is roughly the same as the diameter of Greater London if you include its satellite towns - with Manchester and its airport slap bang in the middle. If you could spend to link up those three, offer tax incentives for companies to base themselves there, it would make a pretty good second hub. You've already had tentative moves with Media City and C4 to Leeds, but really needs government to be far more proactive. If I were Boris it's where I'd be focusing my love of vaguely fantastical projects.
    Or just let our regions outside the capital have to powers to do their own thing and not be mercy to the whim of Whitehall.

    And this isn't tackling the real issue which is outside the big cities.
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,048

    Britain‘s problem is that it doesn’t really have a 2nd City. There is no equivalent of Marseilles, Frankfurt, Milan etc to counterbalance London in a meaningful way. The likes of Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow are “3rd cities” really

    The problem is that London is so much better than blooming Berlin or Milan (Rome not really being the first city of Italy, economically). London is even better at powerful-city business than Paris, based on the net migration direction. How do you balance for its global leadership role that also attracts thousands of talented UK workers - should you even try, or accept that different people will sort into different cities based on personal ambition, and tax the gains to benefit others?
  • Options
    Time for the hand-egg finals...
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,008

    isam said:

    CatMan said:
    They have, and it’s got nothing to do with the fact that smoking cannabis causes lifelong mental illness and a great percentage of mass killers and terrorists were users.

    The scary thing is that these people weren’t under the influence of it at the time, the damage was done previously
    All the more reason to recognise prohibition has failed and didn't prevent this damage.
    Yes let’s have something that sends young people insane mass produced, sold in shops on the High St and advertised on tv, what a great idea
  • Options
    Quincel said:

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    Perhaps, or perhaps this is a rumour which never pans out beyond tomorrow's chip paper. Time will tell, and I don't see how we can know in advance.
    The raison d'etre of the FT is that businesses should be able to rely on what they read in its pages. That is, news should be reported without being subject to any particular niche political filter designed to appeal to its targeted market segment.

    So, conflating the FT with chip paper is a bit rich. There is clearly something behind this, even if it should not necessarily be read at face value. Regardless of what they are actually planning, I suspect that this is evidence of Nissan's frustration with the EU. By going public with that frustration, Nissan may be trying to get EU governments to recognise that they are not in that strong a negotiating position and that a more pragmatic negotiating stance is warranted.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002

    Time for the hand-egg finals...

    Oooo ooo ooo ooo ooooooo ooo oooooo
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154

    Quincel said:

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    Perhaps, or perhaps this is a rumour which never pans out beyond tomorrow's chip paper. Time will tell, and I don't see how we can know in advance.
    The raison d'etre of the FT is that businesses should be able to rely on what they read in its pages. That is, news should be reported without being subject to any particular niche political filter designed to appeal to its targeted market segment.

    So, conflating the FT with chip paper is a bit rich. There is clearly something behind this, even if it should not necessarily be read at face value. Regardless of what they are actually planning, I suspect that this is evidence of Nissan's frustration with the EU. By going public with that frustration, Nissan may be trying to get EU governments to recognise that they are not in that strong a negotiating position and that a more pragmatic negotiating stance is warranted.
    Also, who wants pink chips?
  • Options
    Floater said:
    I'm only going on the graph of china which has flattened for 24 hours.

    Personally, I think this looks like a really bad one.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175

    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
    Starmer has a -17% rating with 2019 Tory voters, worse than Nandy's -11% albeit better than Long Bailey's -38% rating with Tories.

    Starmer does lead with Labour voters though
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    speedy2 said:

    Biden's campaign is going down the toilet at the moment, John Kerry (who is supporting Biden) is considering joining the race as a candidate of his own to try to stop Bernie Sanders:
    https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1224078785332633600
    That's not a vote of confidence for Biden.

    The idea Kerry thinks the Democratic base are going to pick the man who lost to George W Bush over Bernie is absurd, if a former twice elected VP like Biden can't beat him he certainly can't
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited February 2020
    Except the FT report says the opposite, that Nissan are planning to close their two European plants and investing more in the UK.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175

    If Sinn Fein are in Government either side of the Irish border I wonder if they'll push for a border poll?

    Sinn Fein are already in Government in Northern Ireland (but with fewer votes and seats than the DUP), however both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail have said they will refuse to work with them in the Republic.

    In any case they can ask all they want, Boris will tell them a firm no exactly as he has to Sturgeon
  • Options
    Can nobody ever sing the US national anthem without doing massive over warbling?
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,994
    Or they've run out of testing kits.
  • Options
    If this happens I guess the race consolidates into Bernie vs Biden pretty quickly.
  • Options

    Time for the hand-egg finals...

    American Rugby, I think you mean!
  • Options
    isam said:
    I'm officially fearful for West Ham's chances this season :(
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited February 2020
    A 7% win for Sanders would be bigger than Hillary's Iowa caucuses win in 2016 and Kerry's in 2004 and about as big a win as Obama's in 2008
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited February 2020
    isam said:

    twitter.com/daisychristo/status/1223648167385796611?s=21

    What I always find interesting is that Major League Baseball has had PitchFx for years now (even before Hawkeye in cricket), that can tell exactly if a pitch was a strike or not, but they have no challenge system.

    The umpires are known to be hugely flawed, each having a different interruption of what they think is the strike zone. But the fans don't want the tech involved. The tech is really just used to illustrate how much pitches move to fans at home (it is just a given lots of the calls are wrong) and for the teams to analyse performance.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    If Sinn Fein are in Government either side of the Irish border I wonder if they'll push for a border poll?

    Sinn Fein are already in Government in Northern Ireland (but with fewer votes and seats than the DUP), however both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail have said they will refuse to work with them in the Republic.
    If it's good enough for Arlene, it's good enough for Leo or Michael?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited February 2020

    Can nobody ever sing the US national anthem without doing massive over warbling?

    The anthem is the best bet, I normally go to bed after (unfortunately the BBC missed it this year as the BAFTAs overran).

    Whitney Houston's anthem performance is iconic
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bW5Wf_dH7Q
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    A 7% win for Sanders would be bigger than Hillary's Iowa caucuses win in 2016 and Kerry's in 2004 and about as big a win as Obama's in 2008
    True but mostly an artifact of a split field. You could also say OMG WTF Bernie lost nearly half his support in 4 years.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,027

    Except the FT report says the opposite, that Nissan are planning to close their two European plants and investing more in the UK.
    I think the poster was referring to the net effect across all makers, not just Nissan
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
    Starmer has a -17% rating with 2019 Tory voters, worse than Nandy's -11% albeit better than Long Bailey's -38% rating with Tories.

    Starmer does lead with Labour voters though
    If Starmer could go into the 2024 general election with a mere -17% net unfavourability rating amongst 2019 Tory voters, then Labour would probably win.

    The statistic that for me stood out was this one. Starmer has a net +1% favourability rating amongst all voters aged 55+. That is stunningly good, when put in context, which is that amongst the same 55+ age cohort the Labour Party in general has a -58% rating and Corbyn has -78%.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited February 2020

    HYUFD said:

    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
    Starmer has a -17% rating with 2019 Tory voters, worse than Nandy's -11% albeit better than Long Bailey's -38% rating with Tories.

    Starmer does lead with Labour voters though
    If Starmer could go into the 2024 general election with a mere -17% net unfavourability rating amongst 2019 Tory voters, then Labour would probably win.

    The statistic that for me stood out was this one. Starmer has a net +1% favourability rating amongst all voters aged 55+. That is stunningly good, when put in context, which is that amongst the same 55+ age cohort the Labour Party in general has a -58% rating and Corbyn has -78%.
    Apart from Tories Starmer has a net positive rating with everyone bar voters in the Midlands, C2s, over 65s and Leavers and those widowed, divorced or separated checking the detail of the poll (he has a neutral rating with voters for parties other than the big 3), so yes the Tories will certainly face a tougher challenge with him than Corbyn.
    https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-01/ipsos_mori_political_pulse_january_2020_1.pdf
  • Options

    Ireland Update :


    Excellent. Varadkhar in 3rd place, despite his latest rather desperate attempts to play the anti-British card.



  • Options
    It seems @zerohedge has got the ban hammer from twitter.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175

    Ireland Update :


    Excellent. Varadkhar in 3rd place, despite his latest rather desperate attempts to play the anti-British card.



    None of those parties are exactly pro British (they were all formed out of the Irish War of Independence and Irish civil war, though Fine Gael is traditionally the least hostile being formed from the pro Anglo Irish Treaty forces of Michael Collins). They are all anti Brexit.

    It is also rather ironic that while Varadkar insists on Sinn Fein being part of the Northern Irish government he says he will refuse to allow them any part of the Republic of Ireland government
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,370

    HYUFD said:

    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
    Starmer has a -17% rating with 2019 Tory voters, worse than Nandy's -11% albeit better than Long Bailey's -38% rating with Tories.

    Starmer does lead with Labour voters though
    If Starmer could go into the 2024 general election with a mere -17% net unfavourability rating amongst 2019 Tory voters, then Labour would probably win.

    The statistic that for me stood out was this one. Starmer has a net +1% favourability rating amongst all voters aged 55+. That is stunningly good, when put in context, which is that amongst the same 55+ age cohort the Labour Party in general has a -58% rating and Corbyn has -78%.
    Yes, very striking. Especially as the poll in general shows that almost EVERYONE is unpopular. Boris honeymoon? Nah, net unfavourable. Corbyn won the argument? Nope, net unfavourable. Tories? Labour? LibDems? All unpopular.

    The Tories are streets ahead because there's no viable opposition at the moment. But the idea that Johnson is bestriding the country is a miasma.
  • Options

    Ireland Update :


    Excellent. Varadkhar in 3rd place, despite his latest rather desperate attempts to play the anti-British card.



    Excellent that perennially pro British Sinn Fein is in joint first place.
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    It seems @zerohedge has got the ban hammer from twitter.

    I saw that earlier
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,175
    edited February 2020

    Ireland Update :


    Excellent. Varadkhar in 3rd place, despite his latest rather desperate attempts to play the anti-British card.

    'Excellent that perennially pro British Sinn Fein is in joint first place.'

    Varadkar is hardly pro British is he and who leads the Irish Republic (which is no longer even in the Commonwealth) does not really make much difference to post Brexit UK when all 3 are hardly fans of Brexit, though I see both Varadkar and Martin have said they would work together rather than allow Sinn Fein into Government
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 19,027

    HYUFD said:

    Gabs3 said:

    Starmer destroys his opponents in IPSOS polling, a leader with a positive net approval!

    Is that because the only people that have heard of him are Labour supporters?
    No, the polling is clear that Starmer's net +5% favourability rating is nothing to do with differential rates of responses. Virtually the same proportion of Conservative and Labour knew enough about Starmer to express an opinion on him, one way or the other.

    https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/low-public-awareness-all-labour-leadership-candidates-although-keir-starmer-starting-stronger
    Starmer has a -17% rating with 2019 Tory voters, worse than Nandy's -11% albeit better than Long Bailey's -38% rating with Tories.

    Starmer does lead with Labour voters though
    If Starmer could go into the 2024 general election with a mere -17% net unfavourability rating amongst 2019 Tory voters, then Labour would probably win.

    The statistic that for me stood out was this one. Starmer has a net +1% favourability rating amongst all voters aged 55+. That is stunningly good, when put in context, which is that amongst the same 55+ age cohort the Labour Party in general has a -58% rating and Corbyn has -78%.
    Yes, very striking. Especially as the poll in general shows that almost EVERYONE is unpopular. Boris honeymoon? Nah, net unfavourable. Corbyn won the argument? Nope, net unfavourable. Tories? Labour? LibDems? All unpopular.

    The Tories are streets ahead because there's no viable opposition at the moment. But the idea that Johnson is bestriding the country is a miasma.
    I realise this might be the most obscure piece of pedantry on PB, but did you mean "...the idea that Johnson is bestriding the country is a chimera"? If not, congratulations: your use of the word "miasma" was quite poetic.
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    HYUFD said:



    ..... though I see both Varadkar and Martin have said they would work together rather than allow Sinn Fein into Government

    Sinn Fein did rather poorly in the Euro elections last year, so they actually haven't put up enough candidates to take full advantage of their popularity surge in Ireland's complicated electoral system. The surge seems to have taken even the Shinners by surprise.

    What is driving it?

    When I was last in Ireland in Nov 2019, it was clear that young people were becoming increasingly disgruntled & angry.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    If Sinn Fein are in Government either side of the Irish border I wonder if they'll push for a border poll?

    Sinn Fein are already in Government in Northern Ireland (but with fewer votes and seats than the DUP), however both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail have said they will refuse to work with them in the Republic.

    In any case they can ask all they want, Boris will tell them a firm no exactly as he has to Sturgeon
    That's correct, I'm almost certain SF's and the DUP's seat count will drop.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,074

    Quincel said:

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    Perhaps, or perhaps this is a rumour which never pans out beyond tomorrow's chip paper. Time will tell, and I don't see how we can know in advance.
    The raison d'etre of the FT is that businesses should be able to rely on what they read in its pages. That is, news should be reported without being subject to any particular niche political filter designed to appeal to its targeted market segment.

    So, conflating the FT with chip paper is a bit rich. There is clearly something behind this, even if it should not necessarily be read at face value. Regardless of what they are actually planning, I suspect that this is evidence of Nissan's frustration with the EU. By going public with that frustration, Nissan may be trying to get EU governments to recognise that they are not in that strong a negotiating position and that a more pragmatic negotiating stance is warranted.
    That was pretty much my reading too.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    Quincel said:

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    Perhaps, or perhaps this is a rumour which never pans out beyond tomorrow's chip paper. Time will tell, and I don't see how we can know in advance.
    The raison d'etre of the FT is that businesses should be able to rely on what they read in its pages. That is, news should be reported without being subject to any particular niche political filter designed to appeal to its targeted market segment.

    So, conflating the FT with chip paper is a bit rich. There is clearly something behind this, even if it should not necessarily be read at face value. Regardless of what they are actually planning, I suspect that this is evidence of Nissan's frustration with the EU. By going public with that frustration, Nissan may be trying to get EU governments to recognise that they are not in that strong a negotiating position and that a more pragmatic negotiating stance is warranted.
    Also, who wants pink chips?
    Gay fish?
  • Options
    isam said:
    I've got her book somewhere. I did not realise she is a West Ham fan, although as she is brainy enough to have won University Challenge almost single-handedly, it is not surprising.
  • Options
    OT for pb's authors:
    Together, Ebook Reviews And Previews Boost The Likelihood Of A Purchase By 30%
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamrowe1/2020/02/02/together-ebook-reviews-and-previews-boost-the-likelihood-of-a-purchase-by-30/
  • Options
    Does Matt Hancock even own a map? Britain has chucked £20 million into the pot to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

    Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the money would help the UK lead the way in developing a new inoculation.

    So far, so good. But: The UK's money will help fund the efforts of Dr Kate Broderick, a 42-year-old Scot based in California, who is working to create a coronavirus vaccine.

    Last time I checked, Scotland California is not actually in Britain.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51352952
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,950

    Does Matt Hancock even own a map? Britain has chucked £20 million into the pot to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

    Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the money would help the UK lead the way in developing a new inoculation.

    So far, so good. But: The UK's money will help fund the efforts of Dr Kate Broderick, a 42-year-old Scot based in California, who is working to create a coronavirus vaccine.

    Last time I checked, Scotland California is not actually in Britain.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51352952

    I think the priority needs to be making every effort necessary to support those looking to ease the problem, rather than worrying too much about where in the world their work is being done.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,950
    rcs1000 said:

    Quincel said:

    Mortimer said:

    Quincel said:

    Floater said:

    twitter.com/alliehbnews/status/1224078891792392194?s=21

    Small print...Nissan will close European mainland plants in Spain and France if required and double down on production in the UK.
    Isn't that exactly the opposite of what was previously claimed?
    It is. The opposite of what they suggested too. This is the company which insisted on a special meeting with the May government where they were allegedly promised we'd get frictionless trade in return for them promising not to pull out of the UK.

    It would be a brave move for Nissan, and great news for some towns and cities in the UK.
    All the mood music about the UK-EU future trading position strategy is really clicking together now.

    I'm glad that we have finally a govt capable of recognising the tremendous value of our massive internal market to both the EU and the ROW.

    Sequencing of the withdrawal/trade talks not looking too favourable to the EU now - seems that the second stage talks even up the imbalance of the first.
    Perhaps, or perhaps this is a rumour which never pans out beyond tomorrow's chip paper. Time will tell, and I don't see how we can know in advance.
    The raison d'etre of the FT is that businesses should be able to rely on what they read in its pages. That is, news should be reported without being subject to any particular niche political filter designed to appeal to its targeted market segment.

    So, conflating the FT with chip paper is a bit rich. There is clearly something behind this, even if it should not necessarily be read at face value. Regardless of what they are actually planning, I suspect that this is evidence of Nissan's frustration with the EU. By going public with that frustration, Nissan may be trying to get EU governments to recognise that they are not in that strong a negotiating position and that a more pragmatic negotiating stance is warranted.
    That was pretty much my reading too.
    Hopefully the EU’s politicians will eventually get the message.

    Although right now they seem to be redefining the level playing field to mean signing up blind to whatever their next social or regulatory policy change happens to be.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,849
    Sandpit said:

    Does Matt Hancock even own a map? Britain has chucked £20 million into the pot to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

    Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the money would help the UK lead the way in developing a new inoculation.

    So far, so good. But: The UK's money will help fund the efforts of Dr Kate Broderick, a 42-year-old Scot based in California, who is working to create a coronavirus vaccine.

    Last time I checked, Scotland California is not actually in Britain.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51352952

    I think the priority needs to be making every effort necessary to support those looking to ease the problem, rather than worrying too much about where in the world their work is being done.
    Agreed.
    That said, a vaccine is going to take time which we increasingly don’t seem to have. It does not look as though the spread is going to be controlled (I sincerely hope I’m wrong about this).
  • Options
    It is very quiet in the new thread.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 27,025

    It is very quiet in the new thread.

    A quiet time of the year maybe.
This discussion has been closed.