With all the focus on the GE2019 aftermath we haven’t paid much attention to what will almost certainly be the biggest political betting event of 2020 – the White House Race. At the moment, five and a half weeks before the Iowa caucuses the main activity has been on the Democratic nomination battle.
Comments
I’m not convinced that is the case (much as I’d like it to be). The Democrats need a candidate who can turn out all the parts of their coalition, irrespective of how long that candidate might have been around.
The Republicans are far less of a coalition than a monolith in terms of voter identity. Their vote will turn out, but it is to a much greater extent capped.
It is relevant to UK politics too, but essential reading if talking about the US:
https://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/interviews/rhetoric-escalates-talking-lilliana-mason/
HNY20 anyway. Let's hope it's a good one.
💃
I wish everyone all you wish yourselves! And to those not in the best of health, a speedy recovery.
Personally, I can't wait to see the back of 2019. Wishing everyone a peaceful 2020.
2020 is going to be very interesting right upto 31st December
Wishing everyone a Happy New Year nonetheless.
I’m not sure we’ll have one though, it’s going to be bumpy.
(I don’t think it will be great for me personally, but that’s a separate issue.)
😊
2019 was TOP!
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/31/elizabeth-warren-howard-dean-2020-091557
“I think the Warren-Pete fight in Iowa is probably going to hurt them in the way that Dean-Gephardt ‘murder-suicide pact’ did,” Joe Trippi, a top strategist on Dean’s campaign, said ruefully....
Could turn out to be right.
Warren’s attack on him was undoubtedly effective, but fundamentally misconceived (as well as being significantly inaccurate). Not a good look for a politician of principle.
It will be interesting to see if Buttigieg can respond effectively without damaging himself in the process.
The last the the Democrats need is the various parts of the coalition engaging in internecine warfare, and they know it.
Enjoy the festivities.
Anyway, happy New Year everyone.
a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance
especially in politics.
To everything there is a season
a time to laugh, and a time to weep; a time to dance, and a time to mourn
especially in politics.
18.7 in Scotland on Saturday - Last time I was there was in August a couple of years back and I don't think it reached that in Aviemore any day of the week.
That temperature is astounding
But surely, if he stands and gets the nominations, that blocks Rayner so there will be no plausible left wing candidate?
Or has he not thought of that, because he’s an idiot?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/31/books/gertrude-himmelfarb-dead.html
Imagine if this technology had been around over the last hundred years and how many brilliant careers would have been stopped in their tracks.
Still not sure who the best candidate for leader will be though.
We can therefore be fairly certain he won’t win.
Does anyone think Boris Johnson is the Joseph Chamberlain of our time?
Just reading the thread and so sorry you and your good lady are unwell
Just want to send my best wishes to you both to recover soon and look forward to an interesting 2020
@malcolmg Hope your wife has a speedy recovery, and that you can get some rest tonight.
About as likely as RLB becoming PM in 2024!
I’d add a soupçon of imperial preference to that. Which does not seem to be Johnson,
(Oh and Happy New Year!)
South Carolina is actually 4th.
The order for the Democratic Primary is:
Iowa (03/02)
N.Hampshire (11/02)
Nevada (22/02)
S.Carolina (29/02)
Super Tuesday (10/03)
By the end of March the contest should be over, there are very few states after March 17th.
Because the top 4 are very close in the first 3 states whoever wins Iowa will win the first 3 states due to momentum.
If Biden loses Iowa he will lose the first 3 contests in a row, 4 strait weeks of losing.
The betting therefore should reflect primarly if only Iowa, and don't forget Iowa for the Democrats has special rules too.
I'm not denying that winning Iowa has boosted the candidates who do so, but it rarely if ever dominates the process like you describe. Iowa and NH frequently have different winners, and though nominees tend to win one of them there's no rule which says you have to.
Happy New Year to all PBers.
https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1212138977953796096?s=08