politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Finchley & Golders Green – the only constituency where there’ve been two polls
The Chief Rabbi’s comments on anti-semitism put the focus once again on what’s troubled Corbyn’s Labour Party for nearly 2 years – the way it has handled anti-semitism within the movement.
The Hindus (pro) and the Sikhs (against) are piling into the Chief Rabbi’s row with Jeremy Corbyn too now. Just the Jedis left to come and that’s a religious full house. Take a bow, #GE2019 https://t.co/PgOSt3JXGJ
The trouble is if Labour continue to narrow the gap nationally and it's looking close on polling day, are Jewish voters in Finchley and Golders Green really going to risk letting Corbyn become PM of a coalition government by voting Lib Dem?
Luciana should have gone for an ex Liberal now Labour seat like Lynne Featherstone's seat. Everything seems to point to Tories holding up much better than expected in London so don't see her winning but possibly 2nd.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
Personal view: I think that the Deltapoll numbers are almost certainly spot on. They are almost exactly what I'd expect for the constituency: a big LD surge, but not enough.
I would expect similar results (i.e. a big surge... but not enough...) in Kensington, Cities of London & Westminster, Putney, and Wimbledon.
There will likely be a lot of close results, and some rather disappointed candidates (and ex-MPs).
One reason I doubt there’ll be a landslide: the Ashcroft forced choice only puts Boris leading a Tory Gov over Corbyn leading a Labour Gov at 55:45 respectively, just 10 points.
For a landslide, I’d be expecting something like 60:40 in Boris’s favour, or even higher.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
My surprise result is CON gain Hamilton E and Lanark as LAB tactically vote CON to get rid of SNP. Also maybe Perth and Perthshire N. And possibly Argyll & Bute but less LAB to squeeze there.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
'Veered towards an almost fascist ideaology' Let's hope those words stick in the throat of every Corbyn apologist. And now how even more hollow and twisted do the attacks on the chief Rabbi look?
Luciana should have gone for an ex Liberal now Labour seat like Lynne Featherstone's seat. Everything seems to point to Tories holding up much better than expected in London so don't see her winning but possibly 2nd.
I think she went for Finchley & Golders Green because she used to live in Finchley and commute to Haberdashers Askes. I think she'll manage a good second in the seat, but no more.
The trouble is if Labour continue to narrow the gap nationally and it's looking close on polling day, are Jewish voters in Finchley and Golders Green really going to risk letting Corbyn become PM of a coalition government by voting Lib Dem?
Is Labour narrowing the gap? Aren't they marooned about twelve points behind the Conservatives. I can understand how that narrative might work in the constituency, but I don't think it's actually true.
Could Labour perking up a bit be almost entirely due to the WASPI bung? People who wouldn't vote Labour unless you paid them, are literally getting paid to vote Labour. It would be interesting to see whether their vote share amongst females has increased, though the spouses could well be just as enthused.
No significant difference between this and the last Yougov re:gender, both Labour and Tories up by same amount with women.
The main difference is Labour surging wiv da yoof and being slightly less shit with the retired.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
My surprise result is CON gain Hamilton E and Lanark as LAB tactically vote CON to get rid of SNP. Also maybe Perth and Perthshire N. And possibly Argyll & Bute but less LAB to squeeze there.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
My shock of the night prediction is for the SCons to beat GE2017 in seats.
If they top 16 seats (three net gains) I make a nice sum with Laddys.
Personal view: I think that the Deltapoll numbers are almost certainly spot on. They are almost exactly what I'd expect for the constituency: a big LD surge, but not enough.
I would expect similar results (i.e. a big surge... but not enough...) in Kensington, Cities of London & Westminster, Putney, and Wimbledon.
There will likely be a lot of close results, and some rather disappointed candidates (and ex-MPs).
Berger and Umunna have more chance of squeezing the Labour vote though as ex Labour MPs
'Veered towards an almost fascist ideaology' Let's hope those words stick in the throat of every Corbyn apologist. And now how even more hollow and twisted do the attacks on the chief Rabbi look?
You’re a Boris apologist so you have no right to comment whatsoever on right or wrong.
Could Labour perking up a bit be almost entirely due to the WASPI bung? People who wouldn't vote Labour unless you paid them, are literally getting paid to vote Labour. It would be interesting to see whether their vote share amongst females has increased, though the spouses could well be just as enthused.
There isn't really much the Tories can do. To attack the claim draws more people's attention to the free money.
All they can do is use the fact they've been conservative with the dosh so far, and come out with their own barrel of pork. Something eye catching to steal the agenda.
What would be most effective? Matching the Waspi money, or trying to open up a new front in a Labour flank? Sadly, I suspect those flanks are so tribal that they can't actually be bribed to vote Tory!
Even if it was desirable to match the bribe, there's no way it could be done without being a catastrophic humiliation.
Yes, a new front. Not aimed at tribal Labour supporters, aimed at the waverers. Not students, but perhaps Theresa May's jams. Bearing in mind that they'll probably actually have to deliver it, so it cannot be totally insane. Student debt is a possible target. Help to buy is another. Gradual VAT reduction (reward for leaving) is another.
One reason I doubt there’ll be a landslide: the Ashcroft forced choice only puts Boris leading a Tory Gov over Corbyn leading a Labour Gov at 55:45 respectively, just 10 points.
For a landslide, I’d be expecting something like 60:40 in Boris’s favour, or even higher.
I think there will be a landslide simply because the Labour Party has lost seven to eight points of share to the LDs, and while they might get one or two back, that's not enough.
Worse for the Labour Party, the Conservative vote share is rising in places where Labour is the challenger, and is falling where the LDs are distant number twos or threes.
That makes for an increasingly efficient vote share. I'm going to say a majority of 100+ is highly likely.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
My surprise result is CON gain Hamilton E and Lanark as LAB tactically vote CON to get rid of SNP. Also maybe Perth and Perthshire N. And possibly Argyll & Bute but less LAB to squeeze there.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
My shock of the night prediction is for the SCons to beat GE2017 in seats.
If they top 16 seats (three net gains) I make a nice sum with Laddys.
Perthshire, Edinburgh SW and East Lothian. Job done
The Hindus (pro) and the Sikhs (against) are piling into the Chief Rabbi’s row with Jeremy Corbyn too now. Just the Jedis left to come and that’s a religious full house. Take a bow, #GE2019 https://t.co/PgOSt3JXGJ
Have to say, the delta from Labour's original 23% poll level and where they finish up will be a nice measure of how many hypocritical poseurs there are who happily spend 2 years saying they wouldn't vote for a racist, but when push came to shove discovered they didn't really care.
“You are not proposing to offer compensation for pension change to women born in 1960?”
Corb : Correct
“So you believe that 26 years was sufficient notice but 25 years was not?”
Corb: Ummmm...
So if the Pensions Act has only specified one extra year then the country would have saved 58b through averting this “monstrous injustice”
The Conservatives are really making a mistake with the line that this is “unaffordable”. They should be focussing fairly and squarely on the idea that the change wasn’t planned properly with fair notice. Not least because if you cave into this argument then virtually all pension reform becomes almost impossible for ever more. And actually with all the changes in recent years to state and other pensions they are equivalent or even far more deserving, far more short notice, injustices” that would dwarf this one in financial cost.
Simply focussing on the cost of recompense gives the campaign validity and suggests that everything is only driven by money.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
Have to say, the delta from Labour's original 23% poll level and where they finish up will be a nice measure of how many hypocritical poseurs there are who happily spend 2 years saying they wouldn't vote for a racist, but when push came to shove discovered they didn't really care.
They may have been down-weighted because although they said they'dvote Labour, their likelihood to vote was lower?
Why did the Daily Mirror splash massively on Labour’s pensioners manifesto today if Labour weren’t focussing on it themselves? Was it a late decision in response to the rabbi?
“You are not proposing to offer compensation for pension change to women born in 1960?”
Corb : Correct
“So you believe that 26 years was sufficient notice but 25 years was not?”
Corb: Ummmm...
So if the Pensions Act has only specified one extra year then the country would have saved 58b through averting this “monstrous injustice”
The Conservatives are really making a mistake with the line that this is “unaffordable”. They should be focussing fairly and squarely on the idea that the change wasn’t planned properly with fair notice. Not least because if you cave into this argument then virtually all pension reform becomes almost impossible for ever more. And actually with all the changes in recent years to state and other pensions they are equivalent or even far more deserving, far more short notice, injustices” that would dwarf this one in financial cost.
Simply focussing on the cost of recompense gives the campaign validity and suggests that everything is only driven by money.
No, they shouldn't focus on it at all. Corbyn being seen as profligate is a done deal. All focusing on winning this argument does is draw more peoples' attention to the fact that there's a tidy windfall for them if Labour wins.
The only win to be gained her is to respond with a totally different bribe (or three). Then it's Labour who can't respond, because they can't critique the Tories for spending too much, nor can they spend any more to try and get the attention back. They have played their last card, and it was a pretty good one, but now it's for the Tories to counter.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
The meme of Johnson's lies is a strong theme, showing through. While Corbyn is feared by some he is thought to be sincere indeed he frightens Tories for precisely that reason!
Sorry @rcs1000, but I have known a few landslide elections in my time, but this one really doesn't feel like it on the ground. I have cashed out my spread bets.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
If only 6% recalled Brexit, it can’t be particularly meaningful.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
The meme of Johnson's lies is a strong theme, showing through. While Corbyn is feared by some he is thought to be sincere indeed he frightens Tories for precisely that reason!
Sorry @rcs1000, but I have known a few landslide elections in my time, but this one really doesn't feel like it on the ground. I have cashed out my spread bets.
Oh, I think a Johnson landslide will be a disaster for the country. I don't look forward to it, I just think it's going to happen.
That’s more complimentary than your remarks on the famous occasion they caused you to lose a bet which involved eating a pizza with pineapple on it.
I am surprised you didn’t make a pun around letting he who is without Sind caste the first stone....
I can’t take every opportunity to make awesome puns, it would leave the rest of you bereft. I was also seeking a karma atmosphere than the last thread, where we had some actual Nazis posting in support of Jeremy Corbyn.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
My surprise result is CON gain Hamilton E and Lanark as LAB tactically vote CON to get rid of SNP. Also maybe Perth and Perthshire N. And possibly Argyll & Bute but less LAB to squeeze there.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
My shock of the night prediction is for the SCons to beat GE2017 in seats.
If they top 16 seats (three net gains) I make a nice sum with Laddys.
Perthshire, Edinburgh SW and East Lothian. Job done
Have to say, the delta from Labour's original 23% poll level and where they finish up will be a nice measure of how many hypocritical poseurs there are who happily spend 2 years saying they wouldn't vote for a racist, but when push came to shove discovered they didn't really care.
If you don’t want to vote for a racist, the remaining options are Green, LD, SNP and PC.
Corbyn refuses to apologize to the Jewish community in the interview merely saying 'I dont want anyone to go through what anyone has gone through' clip on Twitter
"Maybe today’s focus on LAB’s antisemitism will help Berger. I have a small bet on her doing it."
I disagree. The more people worry about Labour, the more likely they will be to vote Tory, unless the Lib Dems are clear challengers, which they're not here.
I have to say, the threat of Corbyn is a factor in my thinking this election. Despite the fact that Johnson is an untrustworthy buffoon surrounded by the Tory right ministers and dangerous advisors, can I risk a Labour-led government with Corbyn and his shadow cabinet by voting for a non-Con option in a marginal where only Con and Lab can win? I'm not sure I can.
Liberal Party Election Broadcast being shown now on Scottish Television featuring individuals across England. That will go down like a bag of sick across Scotland. Even SLAB managed to have one featuring Richard Leonard. The SCons ones have featured SCon MPs and MSPs.
My surprise result is CON gain Hamilton E and Lanark as LAB tactically vote CON to get rid of SNP. Also maybe Perth and Perthshire N. And possibly Argyll & Bute but less LAB to squeeze there.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
My shock of the night prediction is for the SCons to beat GE2017 in seats.
If they top 16 seats (three net gains) I make a nice sum with Laddys.
Perthshire, Edinburgh SW and East Lothian. Job done
I'm assuming the discussion on Twitter about the Andrew Neil interview (7pm?) is the reason the Tories have tightened their Betfair prices over the last hour or so.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
The meme of Johnson's lies is a strong theme, showing through. While Corbyn is feared by some he is thought to be sincere indeed he frightens Tories for precisely that reason!
Sorry @rcs1000, but I have known a few landslide elections in my time, but this one really doesn't feel like it on the ground. I have cashed out my spread bets.
Oh, I think a Johnson landslide will be a disaster for the country. I don't look forward to it, I just think it's going to happen.
There’s something Oedipal about your constant talking down of LD prospects!
Comments
https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1199390279876403201
It seems an exceptionally important stage of the canpaign.
I get pretty irritated whenever the Archbishop of Canterbury opines and I’m basically CofE.
Ealing Southall.....Con gain!!!!!! LOL
How will you differentiate between those who say 'no' because they hate Sprouts and those who say 'no' because they hate Brussels?
Might all end up with another referendum.
I would expect similar results (i.e. a big surge... but not enough...) in Kensington, Cities of London & Westminster, Putney, and Wimbledon.
There will likely be a lot of close results, and some rather disappointed candidates (and ex-MPs).
For a landslide, I’d be expecting something like 60:40 in Boris’s favour, or even higher.
Possible not Ross Skye etc although we did win there 1979!
Let's hope those words stick in the throat of every Corbyn apologist. And now how even more hollow and twisted do the attacks on the chief Rabbi look?
The main difference is Labour surging wiv da yoof and being slightly less shit with the retired.
If they top 16 seats (three net gains) I make a nice sum with Laddys.
They know my feelings about them, that they are nearly as bad as pineapple on pizzas.
Yes, a new front. Not aimed at tribal Labour supporters, aimed at the waverers. Not students, but perhaps Theresa May's jams. Bearing in mind that they'll probably actually have to deliver it, so it cannot be totally insane. Student debt is a possible target. Help to buy is another. Gradual VAT reduction (reward for leaving) is another.
Worse for the Labour Party, the Conservative vote share is rising in places where Labour is the challenger, and is falling where the LDs are distant number twos or threes.
That makes for an increasingly efficient vote share. I'm going to say a majority of 100+ is highly likely.
“You are not proposing to offer compensation for pension change to women born in 1960?”
Corb : Correct
“So you believe that 26 years was sufficient notice but 25 years was not?”
Corb: Ummmm...
So if the Pensions Act has only specified one extra year then the country would have saved 58b through averting this “monstrous injustice”
The Conservatives are really making a mistake with the line that this is “unaffordable”. They should be focussing fairly and squarely on the idea that the change wasn’t planned properly with fair notice. Not least because if you cave into this argument then virtually all pension reform becomes almost impossible for ever more. And actually with all the changes in recent years to state and other pensions they are equivalent or even far more deserving, far more short notice, injustices” that would dwarf this one in financial cost.
Simply focussing on the cost of recompense gives the campaign validity and suggests that everything is only driven by money.
Just shows how engaged the population are with specifics of the election. It also must call in to question the representativeness of polls if people really are not interested. You can take two views Tory landslide because ‘boris is cool’ or 55% turnout and who knows how it will fall
It could produce a (further) swing back to Labour!!
Or maybe not !!!
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1199374507082964994
The only win to be gained her is to respond with a totally different bribe (or three). Then it's Labour who can't respond, because they can't critique the Tories for spending too much, nor can they spend any more to try and get the attention back. They have played their last card, and it was a pretty good one, but now it's for the Tories to counter.
Sorry @rcs1000, but I have known a few landslide elections in my time, but this one really doesn't feel like it on the ground. I have cashed out my spread bets.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50564965
(Is that better, @Nigelb?)
I disagree. The more people worry about Labour, the more likely they will be to vote Tory, unless the Lib Dems are clear challengers, which they're not here.
I have to say, the threat of Corbyn is a factor in my thinking this election. Despite the fact that Johnson is an untrustworthy buffoon surrounded by the Tory right ministers and dangerous advisors, can I risk a Labour-led government with Corbyn and his shadow cabinet by voting for a non-Con option in a marginal where only Con and Lab can win? I'm not sure I can.
Now I wonder if anyone will get that rather obscure pun...
The current Buckethead is an usurper.
Which is fine.