Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New constituency poll for LAB-held Great Grimsby looks dire fo

124

Comments

  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,119
    edited November 2019
    kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    The problem for Corbyn and labour is heading down the tracks for early next year when the Equality and Human Rights Commission reports

    If they find labour guilty of anti semitism the flood gates of anger will break and the compensation claims will be eye watering. The labour party of now will be at an end
  • alb1onalb1on Posts: 698
    148grss said:

    Definitely decided which party to vote for?

    All: 59%
    Con: 71%
    Lab: 54%
    LD: 40%

    https://t.co/FUDaL7yJxW #ge2019 https://t.co/UGXWLYeA8u

    Isn't it just a story of tactical voting between LD and Lab (and poss Green) for many of those voters, though? Looking at the below, suggests huge tactical swings possible in remainia:

    https://twitter.com/MattSingh_/status/1197507032468918272?fbclid=IwAR2_qLojRtvLCm0p3XcauiWYX3EpSxR_yuc_jKnDK0wpcIBqub2YDrMTZxo
    Precisely why the LDs will win seats like Guildford and (possibly) Wimbledon. Seats which would not be on the list without tactical voting.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676

    Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
  • RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    That's a completely meaningless tweet, since the period covered is just a week.
    It is but who on Earth thought over that week 'you know who I think should get my money? The Brexit Party'
    I would guess it was left in a will.
  • Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
  • alb1onalb1on Posts: 698
    BluerBlue said:

    RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    Imagine what it will be after the CEOs finish reading Labour's manifesto...
    No different probably since the Conservative figures have, for years, been driven by Russian money.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061

    kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    The problem for Corbyn and labour is heading down the tracks for early next year when the Equality and Human Rights Commission reports

    If they find labour guilty of anti semitism the flood gates of anger will break and the compensation claims will be eye watering. The labour party of now will be at an end
    and a proper working class centrist party can replace them while we dance of the grave of the Labour Party
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    Verulamius said:
    "If the Labour vote is not holding up in Great Grimsby, where is it?"

    If the Labour Party is thoroughly trounced at this election, what are your views about next Labour leader?

    Would conventional wisdom hold - that a replacement left-winger is most likely (e.g. RLB or Pidcock) or would the party lurch towards the middle-ground?
  • alb1onalb1on Posts: 698

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    Any idiot Remainer who votes tactically against the Tories and risks this repulsive communist lunacy is a fucking moron who DESERVES to have their nice Home Counties house seized by the Corbynite Wealth Gestapo. Wise up you twats.

    Someone or other was predicting an epochal Swinsonian miracle that would see the LDs replace Labour to become the sensible, centre left choice. Is that not happening now?
    Clearly not! I noticed a few weeks ago that women, in particular, really dislike her.

    I still don’t quite know why. She seems OK to me. I like her accent.
    My mum thinks Jo Swinson has the air of a junior office girl :lol:
    In an over-manned totally inefficient office - the sort who will ask you if you want tea / coffee disappear for 10 mins - and come back with neither.
    As opposed to Abbott, who will spill it all over you or Priti Patel, who will charge you rent on the cup, to be paid into a Caymans account?
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    edited November 2019
    Floater said:

    Pulpstar said:

    PaulM said:

    The cross tabs tell the story in the Great Grimsby poll. Undecideds are disproportionately people who voted Labour in 2017. We've seen this pattern in a number of polls recently.

    When they report the headline polls by excluding undecideds, the sample base then becomes one which was more Tory than Labour in 2017.

    From a betting perspective, I think that most of those undecideds who voted Labour last time will revert to Labour again, encourged by the Labour/Momentum driven GOTV effort.

    Is it enough to flip the seat ?
    If they all went Labour it would be very close.
    likelihood of that < 1% ?
    Of course, but the point remains that while excluding don't knows may tend to make some pollsters more accurate in the final polls, it obviously skews the polling during the campaign. I would expect a significant majority of those undecideds to go back home during the final week.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,236

    The problem for Corbyn and labour is heading down the tracks for early next year when the Equality and Human Rights Commission reports

    If they find labour guilty of anti semitism the flood gates of anger will break and the compensation claims will be eye watering. The labour party of now will be at an end

    Possibly so. But we should wait for that report.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331

    RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    That's a completely meaningless tweet, since the period covered is just a week.
    fwiw, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell keep emailing me begging requests. I haven’t as yet got my credit card out.
  • RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    That's a completely meaningless tweet, since the period covered is just a week.
    It is but who on Earth thought over that week 'you know who I think should get my money? The Brexit Party'
    Good question!
  • kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    When the party that is the most sanctimonious about all the -isms and expects an electoral reward for its moral stance turns out to be full of racists, the political opportunity is served up on a silver platter. It would be a bit like if the Greens were being funded by oil & gas executives, or the SNP membership turned out to be mostly English second-home owners...
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Stocky said:

    Verulamius said:
    "If the Labour vote is not holding up in Great Grimsby, where is it?"

    If the Labour Party is thoroughly trounced at this election, what are your views about next Labour leader?

    Would conventional wisdom hold - that a replacement left-winger is most likely (e.g. RLB or Pidcock) or would the party lurch towards the middle-ground?

    I still think it's gonna be Thornberry, but that's just me...
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    drmacf said:

    Hi Guys,
    Anyone knows which online sites or betting shops would accept a cumulative or bankers bet on several constituencies together? I have tried several, but all they allow are single bets, on one Constituency at a time.
    Thanks

    Mel

    They are related contingencies so bookies will never offer accumulators on them.

    The only exception to this is that occasionally you'll get a special bet on some specific combination, but that will be priced up by the bookie specially.
    Richard,

    Thanks for the Zero Hours Contract tip for the debate the other day. Paid out very nicely 😎
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
  • camelcamel Posts: 815
    Advice Sought

    Great news for our no.3 child who is 18 and recently started working full time after quitting college

    Not only will his first vote for labour raise his salary from £12,792 to £20,800, but he will save £1,080 a year with his free under-25s bus travel.

    So the advice I seek is, should, we increase his board or would that be taking advantage?



    (!)
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    You should be ashamed of yourself. Head down to the Coffee Cup and let them know that Corbyn isn't anti-semitic.
  • alb1on said:

    BluerBlue said:

    RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    Imagine what it will be after the CEOs finish reading Labour's manifesto...
    No different probably since the Conservative figures have, for years, been driven by Russian money.
    I thought Labour was all about being open to foreigners? :wink:
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Stocky said:

    Verulamius said:
    "If the Labour vote is not holding up in Great Grimsby, where is it?"

    If the Labour Party is thoroughly trounced at this election, what are your views about next Labour leader?

    Would conventional wisdom hold - that a replacement left-winger is most likely (e.g. RLB or Pidcock) or would the party lurch towards the middle-ground?

    If grimsby is accurate, Pidcock wont hold NW Durham
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    alb1on said:

    148grss said:

    Definitely decided which party to vote for?

    All: 59%
    Con: 71%
    Lab: 54%
    LD: 40%

    https://t.co/FUDaL7yJxW #ge2019 https://t.co/UGXWLYeA8u

    Isn't it just a story of tactical voting between LD and Lab (and poss Green) for many of those voters, though? Looking at the below, suggests huge tactical swings possible in remainia:

    https://twitter.com/MattSingh_/status/1197507032468918272?fbclid=IwAR2_qLojRtvLCm0p3XcauiWYX3EpSxR_yuc_jKnDK0wpcIBqub2YDrMTZxo
    Precisely why the LDs will win seats like Guildford and (possibly) Wimbledon. Seats which would not be on the list without tactical voting.
    After that labour manifesto, I would say that was more doubtful. That rushing sound you can hear is the sharp intake of breath from tory remainers.
  • philiph said:

    drmacf said:

    Hi Guys,
    Anyone knows which online sites or betting shops would accept a cumulative or bankers bet on several constituencies together? I have tried several, but all they allow are single bets, on one Constituency at a time.
    Thanks

    Mel

    They are related contingencies so bookies will never offer accumulators on them.

    The only exception to this is that occasionally you'll get a special bet on some specific combination, but that will be priced up by the bookie specially.
    Richard,

    Thanks for the Zero Hours Contract tip for the debate the other day. Paid out very nicely 😎
    Glad you got on!
  • Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    Yes belittling the anti apartheid movement like that was a shitty move. I think it's an example of how people on both sides of these high octane Twitter wars lose perspective and end up coming across like a dick. There's a fair amount of it going on here these days too. I'd like to see less hysterical anti-Corbyn guff and more analysis of where we stand on the polling.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,236

    It's more horrified by Labour in all its forms. Their racism is just one of many things to attack them on. There are plenty of others, economic incompetence, cosying up to enemies of the country, unpatriotic treachery, inviting terrorists to the HoC, betraying the working class etc etc

    That is one full plate, I must say. But to stick to racism. Or more specifically antisemitism, since this is the one being alleged and investigated. Of the above litany of horrors where does that rank for you?

    Like, is it a bigger or lesser concern than unpatriotic treachery?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    camel said:

    Advice Sought

    Great news for our no.3 child who is 18 and recently started working full time after quitting college

    Not only will his first vote for labour raise his salary from £12,792 to £20,800, but he will save £1,080 a year with his free under-25s bus travel.

    So the advice I seek is, should, we increase his board or would that be taking advantage?



    (!)

    Ask him to start cooking you dinner. :p
  • NorthernPowerhouseNorthernPowerhouse Posts: 557
    edited November 2019
    Just watched the IFS assessment of the Labour Manifesto. “Simply not credible” when asked the direct question on whether or not the spending commitments could only be paid for by the top 5%. 80 billion revenue (day to day) spending increases and that doesn’t even include the spending to invest / purchase private industries.

    To launch an ambitious programme of such change you need to have the credibility behind it. Does Corbyn and Labour really have that kind of credibility ?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,119
    edited November 2019
    camel said:

    Advice Sought

    Great news for our no.3 child who is 18 and recently started working full time after quitting college

    Not only will his first vote for labour raise his salary from £12,792 to £20,800, but he will save £1,080 a year with his free under-25s bus travel.

    So the advice I seek is, should, we increase his board or would that be taking advantage?



    (!)

    You may need to increase his board if you have a mortgage as the markets collapse and interest rates rocket taking mortgage rates up with them. You will also need to invest more in your pension as it collapses with the theft of pension fund shares by McDonnell
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155

    Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    What about the Kipling reading whilst in Myanmar, or his "watermelon smiles" and "piccaninnies" comments?

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/23/africa/boris-johnson-africa-intl/index.html
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,561
    edited November 2019
    Anorak said:

    kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    Using it for less-than-holy purposes does not, however, make it untrue.
    All right thinking people do their best to be anti-racist, however imperfect we are at it. But anti -Semitism tends to have a particular place in the thinking of a lot of people for two reasons; the unique nature of the events in Europe as the attempt was seriously made to extinguish Jewish people altogether, and secondly the very high regard which most UK people have for the extraordinary quality of the contribution made to culture, society, media, academia, medicine, commerce and so many other fields by this highly respected and much loved community. I am not Jewish but was brought up in a post war community with many Jewish people in it. Many of us feel this very personally, as we feel the Windrush scandal personally.
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    He knew exactly what he was doing - pose as a metropolitan liberal while showing a bit of leg to the armchair racists. Meanwhile in the real world he emboldened thugs and there was an up tick in violence against Muslim women. He refused to apologise. I am surprised you are willing to defend him on this to be honest, it reflects badly on you if I may say so, respectfully.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    edited November 2019

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600
    Interesting that he's been so quiet about it in the last three years.
  • so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    Another woman you are happy to bully you cowardly twat.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    RobD said:

    Anorak said:

    Still struggling to square the stream of truly dire constituency polls for Labour, when their national numbers are stable and (maybe) dribbling upwards.

    Any ideas? [BJO: Yougov is not being controlled by the Tories]

    Piling up votes in the metropolis?
    Not after this Labour manifesto
    alb1on said:

    148grss said:

    Definitely decided which party to vote for?

    All: 59%
    Con: 71%
    Lab: 54%
    LD: 40%

    https://t.co/FUDaL7yJxW #ge2019 https://t.co/UGXWLYeA8u

    Isn't it just a story of tactical voting between LD and Lab (and poss Green) for many of those voters, though? Looking at the below, suggests huge tactical swings possible in remainia:

    https://twitter.com/MattSingh_/status/1197507032468918272?fbclid=IwAR2_qLojRtvLCm0p3XcauiWYX3EpSxR_yuc_jKnDK0wpcIBqub2YDrMTZxo
    Precisely why the LDs will win seats like Guildford and (possibly) Wimbledon. Seats which would not be on the list without tactical voting.
    Not after this Labour manifesto
  • NorthofStokeNorthofStoke Posts: 1,758
    edited November 2019

    so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Commissions, lots of commissions.
  • i see some Corbynistas are giving the impression of being #rattled
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    RobD said:

    The difference in these donation numbers is nuts....

    https://www.twitter.com/ChrisMasonBBC/status/1197528262790004737

    That's a completely meaningless tweet, since the period covered is just a week.
    fwiw, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell keep emailing me begging requests. I haven’t as yet got my credit card out.
    Do it!! it cant be long before they promise to pay our cards off for us.

    Get the banks (nudge nudge, wink wink) to pay for it too - win win
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    He knew exactly what he was doing - pose as a metropolitan liberal while showing a bit of leg to the armchair racists. Meanwhile in the real world he emboldened thugs and there was an up tick in violence against Muslim women. He refused to apologise. I am surprised you are willing to defend him on this to be honest, it reflects badly on you if I may say so, respectfully.
    He has expressed apolgises over his letter box comments but Boris is farvmore liberal and pro immigration than many think and if he gets his deal passed I expect to see a more generous immigration policy than Theresa May

    I do not condone racist comments from anywhere or anyone
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    i see some Corbynistas are giving the impression of being #rattled

    I'm in #smugmode.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    Corbyn must be hoping that by 2040 Brexit and The Tories will have failed, and that his sons and friends' sons and daughters can try again to bring Labour back into power.
  • so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Commissions, lots of commissions.
    don't mention that word to an IFA please..... we are allergic to those these days...
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Fully costed means anything but

  • so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Commissions, lots of commissions.
    Lots of commissars running those commission's.

    And economic disaster as a given.
  • Floater said:

    so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Fully costed means anything but

    Unexpected turn of events.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    Just have to laugh at that title - "Here’s the concrete evidence to prove Jeremy Corbyn is not antisemitic"
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,236
    edited November 2019
    Anorak said:

    Using it for less-than-holy purposes does not, however, make it untrue.

    Of course not. Only the facts of each case are relevant to its truth or otherwise. But you will agree, I'm sure, that the partisan political aspect probably leads to a degree of exaggeration and/or unjustified accusations. That is only to be expected. Ditto if it were the other way, e.g. the Cons being attacked for islamophobia. The politics is a factor and given this is a politics forum I think it's good to acknowledge this.
  • RobD said:

    i see some Corbynistas are giving the impression of being #rattled

    I'm in #smugmode.
    All is right with the world then.....
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    He knew exactly what he was doing - pose as a metropolitan liberal while showing a bit of leg to the armchair racists. Meanwhile in the real world he emboldened thugs and there was an up tick in violence against Muslim women. He refused to apologise. I am surprised you are willing to defend him on this to be honest, it reflects badly on you if I may say so, respectfully.
    He has expressed apolgises over his letter box comments but Boris is far more liberal and pro immigration than many think and if he gets his deal passed I expect to see a more generous immigration policy than Theresa May

    I do not condone racist comments from anywhere or anyone
  • RobD said:

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    Just have to laugh at that title - "Here’s the concrete evidence to prove Jeremy Corbyn is not antisemitic"
    You just have to laugh at the source om that weblink before going any further than that...
  • Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600



  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    yeah, best you head off.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600



    Now that's what I call a debunking.
  • Leaflet count in Finchley & Golders Green:
    Lib Dem:7
    Con:5 + canvassing
    Lab:0

    2017 Con maj 1,657 over Lab
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    Just have to laugh at that title - "Here’s the concrete evidence to prove Jeremy Corbyn is not antisemitic"
    You just have to laugh at the source om that weblink before going any further than that...
    Ashamed to admit I didn't notice that.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited November 2019

    so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Look at any page at random. My latest random choice landed on page 24, where I found:

    Labour will introduce A Right to Food [what the hell is that?]. We will end ‘food bank Britain’. We will ensure everyone has access to healthy, nutritious, sustainably produced food. We will halve food bank usage within a year and remove the need for them altogether in three years. We will establish a National Food Commission and review the Allotments Act. We will make food security a reason to intervene in the economy and work with local councils to minimise food waste.

    Food banks wiped out in three years. I wonder if the Trussell Trust know about that?

    Those aren't the only humdingers on just that one page.

    And as for the stuff on employment...
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,898
    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.
  • 148grss said:

    Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    What about the Kipling reading whilst in Myanmar, or his "watermelon smiles" and "piccaninnies" comments?

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/23/africa/boris-johnson-africa-intl/index.html
    Boris uses the word "piccaninnies" once, an esoteric term that most people can neither understand nor spell.

    Lefties: This is Very Bad.

    Also Lefties: Let us repeat the word 50 million squillion times at every available opportunity. This is Very Good.
  • alb1onalb1on Posts: 698

    alb1on said:

    148grss said:

    Definitely decided which party to vote for?

    All: 59%
    Con: 71%
    Lab: 54%
    LD: 40%

    https://t.co/FUDaL7yJxW #ge2019 https://t.co/UGXWLYeA8u

    Isn't it just a story of tactical voting between LD and Lab (and poss Green) for many of those voters, though? Looking at the below, suggests huge tactical swings possible in remainia:

    https://twitter.com/MattSingh_/status/1197507032468918272?fbclid=IwAR2_qLojRtvLCm0p3XcauiWYX3EpSxR_yuc_jKnDK0wpcIBqub2YDrMTZxo
    Precisely why the LDs will win seats like Guildford and (possibly) Wimbledon. Seats which would not be on the list without tactical voting.
    After that labour manifesto, I would say that was more doubtful. That rushing sound you can hear is the sharp intake of breath from tory remainers.
    Not here in Guildford. The Tories are split into factions, with many members disgusted by Milton's treatment and the voters (as opposed to members) focused on Surrey Conservative plans to build new towns next to their favourite villages.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    stodge said:

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    You've read the Tory manifesto? ;)
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    He knew exactly what he was doing - pose as a metropolitan liberal while showing a bit of leg to the armchair racists. Meanwhile in the real world he emboldened thugs and there was an up tick in violence against Muslim women. He refused to apologise. I am surprised you are willing to defend him on this to be honest, it reflects badly on you if I may say so, respectfully.
    He has expressed apolgises over his letter box comments but Boris is farvmore liberal and pro immigration than many think and if he gets his deal passed I expect to see a more generous immigration policy than Theresa May

    I do not condone racist comments from anywhere or anyone
    Do you think he would make racist comments if he knew it would increase his chances of election? I have little doubt he would.

    I think he deliberately tries to get racists think he is racist or at least sympathises with them, whilst also trying to reassure the general population he is not racist.

    Different to Corbyn, tolerating leftist anti semites even if he is not directly anti semitic himself, but both are on a similar scale of racism imo.
  • Wow! How fortunate we are that Russia chooses not to interfere in our own democratic processes.
  • stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    As always an interesting read, but I fear the opportunity from those who feel betrayed by the Tory promises this time goes to Corbynism rather than the LD centrists. I agree the new Tory tent is completely unsustainable.
  • Floater said:

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    Why not rebut the story rather than attack the journalist?
    Because he supports Corbyn?
    Riley is a troll

    She isnt a journalist btw
    She is a British television presenter and mathematician

    You are acting as the troll BJO
    She is a toxic and self-indulgent right-wing troll who has erased the suffering of black people in apartheid South Africa to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a racist

    BTW you are the one supporting a man as PM you know is a racist
    He is not racist
    No he just likes saying racist things.
    His 'letter boxes' was stupid but if you read the whole speech you would see his appeal was for tolerance and of course France has much stricter rules
    He knew exactly what he was doing - pose as a metropolitan liberal while showing a bit of leg to the armchair racists. Meanwhile in the real world he emboldened thugs and there was an up tick in violence against Muslim women. He refused to apologise. I am surprised you are willing to defend him on this to be honest, it reflects badly on you if I may say so, respectfully.
    He has expressed apolgises over his letter box comments but Boris is farvmore liberal and pro immigration than many think and if he gets his deal passed I expect to see a more generous immigration policy than Theresa May

    I do not condone racist comments from anywhere or anyone
    Do you think he would make racist comments if he knew it would increase his chances of election? I have little doubt he would.

    I think he deliberately tries to get racists think he is racist or at least sympathises with them, whilst also trying to reassure the general population he is not racist.

    Different to Corbyn, tolerating leftist anti semites even if he is not directly anti semitic himself, but both are on a similar scale of racism imo.
    I do not accept that but am content to wait the report from the EHRC in the new year
  • so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Look at any page at random. My latest random choice landed on page 24, where I found:

    Labour will introduce A Right to Food [what the hell is that?]. We will end ‘food bank Britain’. We will ensure everyone has access to healthy, nutritious, sustainably produced food. We will halve food bank usage within a year and remove the need for them altogether in three years. We will establish a National Food Commission and review the Allotments Act. We will make food security a reason to intervene in the economy and work with local councils to minimise food waste.

    Food banks wiped out in three years. I wonder if the Trussell Trust know about that?

    Those aren't the only humdingers on just that one page.

    And as for the stuff on employment...
    Wow - is food to be nationalised too?
  • GideonWiseGideonWise Posts: 1,123
    This manifesto is going to receive a worse reception than Theresa's IMO.

    Corbyn and McDonnell were given the benefit of doubt in 2017. People looked at them and just refused to believe what they had heard: 'Magic Grandpa and his mate are communists? Nah, look at their little faces. Fake news.'

    They will look at them now and go: 'y'know what, they actually are bonkers, racist and in all likelihood, a bit evil too.'
  • stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    As always an interesting read, but I fear the opportunity from those who feel betrayed by the Tory promises this time goes to Corbynism rather than the LD centrists. I agree the new Tory tent is completely unsustainable.
    On the other hand the new Labour tent of far-left cranks and antisemites looks totally sustainable...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,614
    camel said:

    Advice Sought

    Great news for our no.3 child who is 18 and recently started working full time after quitting college

    Not only will his first vote for labour raise his salary from £12,792 to £20,800, but he will save £1,080 a year with his free under-25s bus travel.

    So the advice I seek is, should, we increase his board or would that be taking advantage?

    Keep him well fed. You may yet need to eat him.....
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    The Conservative manifesto is due out soon (Friday or Saturday??), so hard to be factual about the content as yet.
  • philiph said:

    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    The Conservative manifesto is due out soon (Friday or Saturday??), so hard to be factual about the content as yet.
    Suggested by Sky due on Sunday
  • This manifesto is going to receive a worse reception than Theresa's IMO.

    Corbyn and McDonnell were given the benefit of doubt in 2017. People looked at them and just refused to believe what they had heard: 'Magic Grandpa and his mate are communists? Nah, look at their little faces. Fake news.'

    They will look at them now and go: 'y'know what, they actually are bonkers, racist and in all likelihood, a bit evil too.'

    From your lips to God's ears. Labour just couldn't resist pushing the boat out even farther this time - hopefully it will earn them the sinking they deserve.
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600



    Now that's what I call a debunking.
    So exclude the vast majority on the basis that most antisemitism is from the right wing and therefore opposing it doesn't count for some reason, and say nothing at all to explain the "fine" EDMs like trying to help Yemeni Jews which would make no sense at all for an antisemite to sponsor.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    TOPPING said:

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    yeah, best you head off.
    Going to start swearing at me again are you?

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    TOPPING said:

    Not wasting anymore time on those who ignore all the evidence but will leave this here.

    Off to Cinema

    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2019/02/25/heres-the-concrete-evidence-to-prove-jeremy-corbyn-is-not-antisemitic/

    yeah, best you head off.
    Going to start swearing at me again are you?

    See ya!
  • philiph said:

    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    The Conservative manifesto is due out soon (Friday or Saturday??), so hard to be factual about the content as yet.
    Suggested by Sky due on Sunday
    Likely to dominate the coverage on Sunday/Monday with postal ballots hitting doorsteps on Monday. Do you think somebody wargamed this?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    philiph said:

    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    The Conservative manifesto is due out soon (Friday or Saturday??), so hard to be factual about the content as yet.
    Suggested by Sky due on Sunday
    Likely to dominate the coverage on Sunday/Monday with postal ballots hitting doorsteps on Monday. Do you think somebody wargamed this?
    Depends if it's crap or not.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,156
    Jason said:

    Can't wait to see the Tory press tomorrow. They must be salivating over the Labour manifesto.

    Didnt matter last time. I look forward to reading it thus evening to see if any smaller stuff is interesting.
  • Must say I am very impressed with the Labour manifesto stuff on DWP.

    And end to cruel sanctions and an end to the crazy utterly failing system of work assessments. Carers Allowance raised. ESA for those who have been penalised for not being in the long term support group raised.

    DWP is broken. Time for change.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,129
    edited November 2019
    BJO really has turned into the left version of PlatoSays. The fake news Canary and the dodgy doctor twitter (who has been served more cease and desist notices over his lies than I have had Lib Dem propaganda leaflets) to prove Jezza is the man.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,236
    BluerBlue said:

    Boris uses the word "piccaninnies" once, an esoteric term that most people can neither understand nor spell.

    Lefties: This is Very Bad.

    Also Lefties: Let us repeat the word 50 million squillion times at every available opportunity. This is Very Good.

    This has the look & feel of a Toby Young tweet.

    Which I'm afraid from the perspective of all people of sound mind and good character is unambiguously Very Bad.
  • so my executive summary catching up on Lab's launch today is lots of tax for company's and their owners (including self employed Ltd businesses) and that Mcdonnell lied about a windfall tax on Oil companies last week....

    What else?

    Look at any page at random. My latest random choice landed on page 24, where I found:

    Labour will introduce A Right to Food [what the hell is that?]. We will end ‘food bank Britain’. We will ensure everyone has access to healthy, nutritious, sustainably produced food. We will halve food bank usage within a year and remove the need for them altogether in three years. We will establish a National Food Commission and review the Allotments Act. We will make food security a reason to intervene in the economy and work with local councils to minimise food waste.

    Food banks wiped out in three years. I wonder if the Trussell Trust know about that?

    Those aren't the only humdingers on just that one page.

    And as for the stuff on employment...
    I am the fundraiser for a Trussell Trust foodbank (we need money as well as food!) Our mission statement is to end poverty in the UK and Trussell Trust does a lot of research in this area. Much as I would love to see Labour achieve its aim I fear their Magic Money Tree is getting as tall as Everest. Apart from that I do believe there will always be short term needs (redundancy, marriage break ups etc). However if someone reforms universal credit that would be a start.

    It will be interesting to see how big the Tory magic money tree is. A dose of realistic hope would be good.
  • RobD said:

    philiph said:

    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    A busy few days so little chance to comment.

    This election ceased to be a contest when Farage effectively handed it to Johnson and the terms of his "sacrifice" will no doubt emerge in due course. With over 70% of the LEAVE vote safely trousered, the Conservatives have a base of 35% and can watch the REMAIN vote split.

    As we know, the Conservative vote is generally the firmest and the LD vote the weakest so the latest MORI numbers came as no surprise to anyone who knows even the slightest thing about politics and elections. Both Labour and LD always struggle to get the vote out where the Conservatives seem to have fewer problems.

    As I've said, I don't look forward to the triumphalism on here or the prospect of five years of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. Those who tell me he will govern as a "liberal" are deluding themselves - the manifesto seems all about promising everything to everyone (they all are to be honest).

    The new coalition of Brexiteers and anti-Corbynites will get Boris over the line on 12/12 but once the former has happened and the latter is gone it will be interesting just how "loyal" they are to Johnson once he has to deal with the reality of day-to-day Government.

    The opportunity for the centrists will be increased by the size of the Conservative majority and the new Tory tent which will eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

    The Conservative manifesto is due out soon (Friday or Saturday??), so hard to be factual about the content as yet.
    Suggested by Sky due on Sunday
    Likely to dominate the coverage on Sunday/Monday with postal ballots hitting doorsteps on Monday. Do you think somebody wargamed this?
    Depends if it's crap or not.
    I have a feeling/hope they will have stress tested the manifesto. They should do.

    They need a team of people playing devils advocate looking at it before the press/opposition do.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    I have to say that Lily Allen/Labour manifesto story in the Mail is genius. Combines 2 things that are catnip to their readers.
  • Corbyn's business tax polices and tax on dividends would wreck every single small business owner in the country.

    Every small company would shut down overnight as it would no longer be profitable to run. Cheaper to operate as a sole trader.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600



    Now that's what I call a debunking.
    Its not though.

    You really think an AS would go to all this trouble condemning AS on 50 different occasions
  • Is there anything Laoour aren't going to nationalize or tax out of business?
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207

    Is there anything Laoour aren't going to nationalize or tax out of business?

    Stupidity and hate
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,156
    kinabalu said:

    Corbyn isn't a racist, he is simply expedient about racism. Right now, anti-semitism suits his political purposes, and so he tolerates it.

    Apologies in advance for this because it's such an obvious comment, but I do think it ought to be made, so why not by me.

    Here goes -

    And many of Corbyn's biggest critics on this are not truly horrified by racism in all its forms, they are simply being opportunistic. Right now, the charge of antisemitism suits their political purposes and hence they push it for all they are worth.
    There will be people doing that. But a problem in the party - and he acknowledges that just not the scale- does not last this long, escalate this much to point of him now being targeted (it was not until last year that many people started saying he personally was anti semitic) on the strength of opponent opportunism alone.

    This isn't a no smoke without fire situation, it's an argument about who started the fire, stokes it and how big it is. Opponents will make hay with that, but their cynical commentary on that doesnt render the overall point moot.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    kinabalu said:

    BluerBlue said:

    Boris uses the word "piccaninnies" once, an esoteric term that most people can neither understand nor spell.

    Lefties: This is Very Bad.

    Also Lefties: Let us repeat the word 50 million squillion times at every available opportunity. This is Very Good.

    This has the look & feel of a Toby Young tweet.

    Which I'm afraid from the perspective of all people of sound mind and good character is unambiguously Very Bad.
    It was only a matter of time before TY turned up here.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,236
    TOPPING said:

    You should be ashamed of yourself. Head down to the Coffee Cup and let them know that Corbyn isn't anti-semitic.

    Odd comment not related to what I posted.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    edited November 2019

    RobD said:

    Rachel Riley: Corbyn is racist, here’s a photo of him (protesting racism) which I doctored in awful taste to fit my right wing agenda

    People: that’s shit Rachel

    Rachel: omg I’m being cyber bullied this is digusting can’t believe it I’m a poor white blonde girl leave me alone

    This is very unpleasant from you. Riley has been the target of far worse than this, and what really annoys you is she has had the courage to tell the truth about it.
    No she changed an image of Corbyn actually opposing Racist Apartheid to one changing the words on the banner to Corbyn is a Racist

    She is a troll
    Struggling to see what's wrong with that?

    Corbyn is a life long anti racist.
    Corrected
    So when he's not saying that Jews purchase influence and that Jews don't get irony when has he ever without prompting by others been against antisemitism?
    Cable street and dozens of EDMs signed suggest otherwise

    Johnson on the other hand
    Go on lets see some EDMs where he's defended Jews from antisemitism please.

    Not sure what you mean about Cable Street. The Battle of Cable Street was in 1936 - I know Corbyn is old but I didn't think he was that old.
    https://twitter.com/toryfibs/status/1148655488529305600



    Now that's what I call a debunking.
    Its not though.

    You really think an AS would go to all this trouble condemning AS on 50 different occasions
    This shows he didn't.
This discussion has been closed.