Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The stark reality of the challenge facing Boris Johnson if he

124»

Comments

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    isam said:
    Would you accept a compromise that meant retaining free movement of people, isam?
    If we could pull the emergency brake.

    Copy and pasted tweets aren’t automatically endorsements in my case
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    nichomar said:

    It’s interesting that possibly Johnson didn’t lie to Brenda because she said ok boris whatever you want

    To be pedantic, Bozo didn't lie to the Queen, he sent JRM for the task...
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,515
    isam said:
    isam said:
    Indeed.

    Another thing I agree with Hitchens about!

    It really is bonkers that this hasn’t been seriously advanced as an option.
  • isam said:

    isam said:
    Would you accept a compromise that meant retaining free movement of people, isam?
    If we could pull the emergency brake.

    Copy and pasted tweets aren’t automatically endorsements in my case
    We couldn't. It wouldn't offer any meaningful change on the status quo as far as numbers are concerned.
  • algarkirk said:

    algarkirk said:

    eek said:

    kinabalu said:

    As an aside, the Queens Benh judgment on prorogation that went in favour of the Government last week comprised some very senior judges. If the Supreme Court decides to overturn that bench then the judiciary is as broken as everything else.

    They won't do that. If betfair put it up and there was 1.05 offered on the SC disagreeing with the Scottish court I would stick £20 on and I would immediately start planning how to spend my £1 winnings. Probably a Dairy Milk.

    It will not be easy for them - since they will be presented with compelling evidence that the PM lied about the reason for suspending democracy - but they will find a way. The alternative of a massive constitutional crisis will be deemed unappealing in the extreme.
    And finding that the Scottish courts are incorrect in finding that the PM lied isn’t going to course a bigger problem within our justice system. Sorry I can’t see the Supreme Court disagreeing with the Scottish court given the evidence made available since
    Politicians don't do the lie direct nearly as often as people think. Much more often they have more than one motive simultaneously for actions, and emphasise one but not the other in public. If courts intervened on such a basis they would be clogged up. This progation is just such a case to my mind. It is indisputable that this session has been long and a Queen's speech is overdue. Indisputable that most of the time prorogation is effective would be taken up with already planned party conferences. Indisputable that the commons has faffed around for three years. Indisputable that there won't be a new deal to consider until after prorogation ends. And finally indisputable that prorogation at this moment is a piece of opportunistic low politics (which may well deservedly backfire). The SC should consider the case carefully and chuck it out, hoping that hubris and nemesis will perform their traditional roles for them.

    Three of your indisputables are eminently disputable. One is demonstrably wrong.
    You are mostly correct I'm afraid. All indisputables are eminently disputable. I shall await some contrarian to disagree with both of us.

    The one that is demonstrably wrong is the suggestion that the Commons have faffed around for three years. The deal has only been on the table for ten months. Since then the government has repeatedly unsuccessfully tried to strongarm the Commons. All the possible progress has been made by the Commons itself.

    The government has faffed around for three years. That, however, is not the Commons’ fault.
  • HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    There has been polling evidence that women are not as keen on Boris as men, and the row with Carrie a few weeks back will not have helped. With this in mind probably Boris was not over-impressed by the party's new knighthoods for wifebeaters campaign.

    My wife cannot stand the man. Neither can my sister. And my mother hates him.
    I have just one niece and she is none too keen. Thinks he's a dick. So does my son's girlfriend. I also have a couple of close female friends and they reckon he's pretty ghastly.

    That's 100% of my close female F&F and it's 100% negative. Boris has no chance with any of them. Neither will he get their votes in the upcoming election.
    The latest Yougov has 33% of women voting Tory but only 31% of men, though the LDs have the highest percentage of female voters of the main parties.

    Labour and the Brexit Party have more male than female voters

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/11/voting-intention-con-32-lab-23-lib-dem-19-brex-14-
    Ps was subjected to listening to a loud and lengthy phone conversation in a coffee shop yesterday. What Boris was called was everything but a gentleman.. Cant recall such vitriol even in the Thatcher years.
    Ps apart from myself, my wife, daughter and son in law think Johnson is an idiot. Am working on my 4 year old grandson!
  • Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    TGOHF said:
    Anyone that takes any notice of her needs medication
  • HYUFD said:

    Nigelb said:

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    On behalf of which party ? :smile:
    I hope for a One Nation Conservative Party that used to exit up until 2016.
    Reversing this sort of change, presumably?

    "The foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, has lifted a ban on UK embassies and high commissions flying the rainbow flag during gay pride events. In one of his first policy shifts since coming to office, Johnson overturned the decision of predecessor, Philip Hammond, who insisted that only the Union flag, the EU’s blue-and-gold flag and the flags of the nations and overseas territories of the United Kingdom could be flown from Foreign Office buildings. The decision on whether and when to raise the gay pride banner will be for individual ambassadors and high commissioners, taking into account local conditions....
    While still foreign secretary, Hammond last month rejected a call from the House of Commons foreign affairs committee to drop his opposition to use of the rainbow flag."

    5th August 2016

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/05/boris-johnson-lifts-ban-on-uk-embassies-flying-gay-pride-rainbow-flag
    By 'One Nation' TSE basically means pro EU.

    Boris is a bigger spender than Cameron and Osborne were just more of a tax cutter than May as well as being more socially liberal than she was too on the whole
    'One nation' should mean governing for all parts of the nation (Union), and all social classes.

    However, it came to mean "wet" because those who described themselves as such baulked at monetarism in the early 1980s, and were far too ready for the UK to roll over in foreign affairs.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    TGOHF said:
    Or we dont do either and we will be alright.

    By the way how is saying Corbyn will damage the UK any difference to criticising Brexit? If we are told to ignore 'project fear' on Brexit why not ignore project fear on Corbyn? I suppose it is the Bankers fear their wealth is confisicated by Corbyn. The same Bankers who bankrolled Leave and the Tories as well as TBP. Talking of Farage and Tice: There profession is Bankers! :wink:
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    edited September 2019

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
  • Oliver Letwin’s interview must be read by anyone betting for or against a 2019 election.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    @isam I also think we should be in the EEA.
  • valleyboy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    There has been polling evidence that women are not as keen on Boris as men, and the row with Carrie a few weeks back will not have helped. With this in mind probably Boris was not over-impressed by the party's new knighthoods for wifebeaters campaign.

    My wife cannot stand the man. Neither can my sister. And my mother hates him.
    I have just one niece and she is none too keen. Thinks he's a dick. So does my son's girlfriend. I also have a couple of close female friends and they reckon he's pretty ghastly.

    That's 100% of my close female F&F and it's 100% negative. Boris has no chance with any of them. Neither will he get their votes in the upcoming election.
    The latest Yougov has 33% of women voting Tory but only 31% of men, though the LDs have the highest percentage of female voters of the main parties.

    Labour and the Brexit Party have more male than female voters

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/11/voting-intention-con-32-lab-23-lib-dem-19-brex-14-
    Ps was subjected to listening to a loud and lengthy phone conversation in a coffee shop yesterday. What Boris was called was everything but a gentleman.. Cant recall such vitriol even in the Thatcher years.
    Ps apart from myself, my wife, daughter and son in law think Johnson is an idiot. Am working on my 4 year old grandson!
    You sound like a disinterested witness!
  • kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,573


    Mr Meeks, I take your point, but the Commons had the opportunity since 2016 to seek a common mind on the best way of putting the referendum vote into effect and in all that time has failed to find even a majority for any significant affirmative position. It also agreed to trigger Art 50 without any attempt to reach a common mind. But I agree of course that government faffed.

  • .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited September 2019
    O/T

    "Why Geoffrey Boycott should keep his knighthood
    In a civilised society, we don’t punish people forever for their past mistakes.
    Brendan O'Neill"

    https://www.spiked-online.com/author/brendan-oneill/
  • Oliver Letwin’s interview must be read by anyone betting for or against a 2019 election.

    That'll be me then.

    I've said a couple of times over the last few days that I think this Parliament won't ever cobble together enough votes to pass a Deal, except in extremis with an imminent No Deal looming, and that given a further GE would be likely indecisive, a referendum to 're-instruct' the Commons what to do is the only way forward.

    So, yes, I expect an extension to June (earliest) to December (latest) next year, with a referendum in the Spring or early Summer. The WA to pass or Brexit to be revoked and, then, a GE2020.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,291

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
  • Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    It only says it will need to be someone 'acceptable' to the Labour leader. It would probably be a Labour MP, but not necessarily.

    That leaves quite a scope.
  • phiwphiw Posts: 32
    edited September 2019

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    In one of my ill-fated local council elections, I had my finger bitten by a dog while pushing one of my obligatory 'candidate points at pothole' newsletters through one of those that closed on me.

    Went to A&E and the nurse told me never to do that again.

    There endeth my political career.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,815

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    +1 I hate it. I don't enjoy the occasional confrontation and from a personal point of view my gut tells me it is none of my business. Fortunately I am considered a bit of a demon deliverer so that gets me out of it most of the time. Sadly age is telling and I'm not as good as I used to be.
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    edited September 2019

    TGOHF said:
    Or we dont do either and we will be alright.

    By the way how is saying Corbyn will damage the UK any difference to criticising Brexit? If we are told to ignore 'project fear' on Brexit why not ignore project fear on Corbyn? I suppose it is the Bankers fear their wealth is confisicated by Corbyn. The same Bankers who bankrolled Leave and the Tories as well as TBP. Talking of Farage and Tice: There profession is Bankers! :wink:
    'There' employment before being politicians were commodities trader and property management boss, respectively. Banks almost universally backed remain, the only exception being Arron.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    algarkirk said:

    algarkirk said:

    eek said:

    kinabalu said:

    As an aside, the Queens Benh judgment on prorogation that went in favour of the Government last week comprised some very senior judges. If the Supreme Court decides to overturn that bench then the judiciary is as broken as everything else.

    They won't do that. If betfair put it up and there was 1.05 offered on the SC disagreeing with the Scottish court I would stick £20 on and I would immediately start planning how to spend my £1 winnings. Probably a Dairy Milk.

    It will not be easy for them - since they will be presented with compelling evidence that the PM lied about the reason for suspending democracy - but they will find a way. The alternative of a massive constitutional crisis will be deemed unappealing in the extreme.
    And finding that the Scottish courts are incorrect in finding that the PM lied isn’t going to course a bigger problem within our justice system. Sorry I can’t see the Supreme Court disagreeing with the Scottish court given the evidence made available since
    Politicians don't do the lie direct nearly as often as people think. Much more often they have more than one motive simultaneously for actions, and emphasise one but not the other in public. If courts intervened on such a basis they would be clogged up. This progation is just such a case to my mind. It is indisputable that this session has been long and a Queen's speech is overdue. Indisputable that most of the time prorogation is effective would be taken up with already planned party conferences. Indisputable that the commons has faffed around for three years. Indisputable that there won't be a new deal to consider until after prorogation ends. And finally indisputable that prorogation at this moment is a piece of opportunistic low politics (which may well deservedly backfire). The SC should consider the case carefully and chuck it out, hoping that hubris and nemesis will perform their traditional roles for them.

    Three of your indisputables are eminently disputable. One is demonstrably wrong.
    You are mostly correct I'm afraid. All indisputables are eminently disputable. I shall await some contrarian to disagree with both of us.

    I'm afraid you're wrong. What you've said is so obviously true that no contrarian could possibly disagree with either of you.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...
  • GIN1138 said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
    Saving the Union is more important than Leaving.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    GIN1138 said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
    Because it would be over with there won’t be large scale riots in the streets but life can get back to normal and those that worry about irrelevant intrusion by the Eu into our lives can keep on worrying about it
  • algarkirk said:

    algarkirk said:

    eek said:

    kinabalu said:

    As an aside, the Queens Benh judgment on prorogation that went in favour of the Government last week comprised some very senior judges. If the Supreme Court decides to overturn that bench then the judiciary is as broken as everything else.

    They won't do that. If betfair put it up and there was 1.05 offered on the SC disagreeing with the Scottish court I would stick £20 on and I would immediately start planning how to spend my £1 winnings. Probably a Dairy Milk.

    It will not be easy for them - since they will be presented with compelling evidence that the PM lied about the reason for suspending democracy - but they will find a way. The alternative of a massive constitutional crisis will be deemed unappealing in the extreme.
    And finding that the Scottish courts are incorrect in finding that the PM lied isn’t going to course a bigger problem within our justice system. Sorry I can’t see the Supreme Court disagreeing with the Scottish court given the evidence made available since
    Politicians

    Three of your indisputables are eminently disputable. One is demonstrably wrong.
    You are mostly correct I'm afraid. All indisputables are eminently disputable. I shall await some contrarian to disagree with both of us.

    The one that is demonstrably wrong is the suggestion that the Commons have faffed around for three years. The deal has only been on the table for ten months. Since then the government has repeatedly unsuccessfully tried to strongarm the Commons. All the possible progress has been made by the Commons itself.

    The government has faffed around for three years. That, however, is not the Commons’ fault.
    I don't quite agree. I'd say the Government faffed around for two and half years, then dumped it on the Commons, after a protracted delay and didn't bother to explain it. Then, most of the Commons didn't bother to come to a considered view on it anyway, but instead tried to exploit it for either party political advantage, or for their own preferred Brexit outcome, refusing to touch it like a scorching hot potato, and otherwise just can kicking it down the road.

    It's only in the last month or two that I've seen signs of dawning realisation. It remains to be seen whether that's too little, too late.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    It only says it will need to be someone 'acceptable' to the Labour leader. It would probably be a Labour MP, but not necessarily.

    That leaves quite a scope.
    And I will continue to bet on Margaret Beckett as most acceptable
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    AndyJS said:

    O/T

    "Why Geoffrey Boycott should keep his knighthood
    In a civilised society, we don’t punish people forever for their past mistakes.
    Brendan O'Neill"

    https://www.spiked-online.com/author/brendan-oneill/

    Personally, I am not bothered either way. Indeed titles and honours are as often by scoundrels as saints, and was ever so.

    I would be more inclined to be sympathetic if Boycott had shown the slightest remorse and repentance.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293

    GIN1138 said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
    Saving the Union is more important than Leaving.

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    Indeed. We're going to end up with PM Farage or something far, far worse the way they are going...
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

  • valleyboy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    There has been polling evidence that women are not as keen on Boris as men, and the row with Carrie a few weeks back will not have helped. With this in mind probably Boris was not over-impressed by the party's new knighthoods for wifebeaters campaign.

    My wife cannot stand the man. Neither can my sister. And my mother hates him.
    I have just one niece and she is none too keen. Thinks he's a dick. So does my son's girlfriend. I also have a couple of close female friends and they reckon he's pretty ghastly.

    That's 100% of my close female F&F and it's 100% negative. Boris has no chance with any of them. Neither will he get their votes in the upcoming election.
    The latest Yougov has 33% of women voting Tory but only 31% of men, though the LDs have the highest percentage of female voters of the main parties.

    Labour and the Brexit Party have more male than female voters

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/11/voting-intention-con-32-lab-23-lib-dem-19-brex-14-
    Ps was subjected to listening to a loud and lengthy phone conversation in a coffee shop yesterday. What Boris was called was everything but a gentleman.. Cant recall such vitriol even in the Thatcher years.
    Ps apart from myself, my wife, daughter and son in law think Johnson is an idiot. Am working on my 4 year old grandson!
    You sound like a disinterested witness!
    Lol
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
    Saving the Union is more important than Leaving.

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    Indeed. We're going to end up with PM Farage or something far, far worse the way they are going...
    Yup - if Brexit is blocked by judges, Lib Dems, Tony Blair and other cretins I’ll be voting Brexit Party for the forseeable.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    nichomar said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    👀👀👀👀

    But third, and most interestingly, Sir Oliver today reveals that he thinks “we need to resolve this issue of Brexit before there is a general election”.

    If that cannot be achieved through a deal to leave, then there will have to be a referendum. This is a crucial new development.

    The Tory high command have assumed that if they can’t have a general election on their preferred timetable before October 31, they could have one in November or December — and they could still cast it as a “Parliament versus the people” contest. But Sir Oliver is one step ahead of them.

    He is confident that there is a majority in Parliament for dealing with Brexit first and having an election after.

    So if the Commons doesn’t support a deal — and all the evidence of the last year suggests it won’t — then it will vote to delay an election until 2020, and have a referendum before that.


    Whether Mr Johnson is still imprisoned in Downing Street while this happens is a secondary question.
    Why on earth would cancelling Brexit, either through revocation or another refernedum be a "resolution" ?
    Because it would be over with there won’t be large scale riots in the streets but life can get back to normal and those that worry about irrelevant intrusion by the Eu into our lives can keep on worrying about it
    Did the Scottish seperatism just melt away like snow on a June day when IN won in 2014?

    Within 12 months Labour was wiped out, the SNP won a majority and the path to Scottish Independence became inevitable.
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    PClipp said:

    Drutt said:

    The FTPA has caused a crisis. Or if it hasn't, a PM who can't call an election despite losing a vote of confidence and is held hostage by a house that can only rush through negative legislation of its own proposition will do until the crisis gets here.

    The correct check on the executive's power to sideline the body that scrutinises it is an action of that body itself.

    The fundamental problem is, surely, that we have somebody who claims to be prime minister, but who lacks a majority of the votes in the House of Commons. The same applies to Mrs May, of course, because bribing people with taxpayers`money to give their support is not really playing fair.

    Johnson should never have been allowed to take the position in the first place. Parliament is absolutely correct in not letting him get away with murder as well.
    Before the FTPA that was no problem. VoNC or dissolution for election. Now the exec has no such power. The FTPA has only notionally increased the power of the legislature but has very seriously denuded the executive.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    Well if Remainers would stop playing games we could have an election to either endorse Boris or reject him.
  • Where in Letwin's undertakings to the good people of West Dorset in 2017 did he say he would propose a second referendum?
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Who is going to complain revoke get it over with return to normal and sort out real problems there is very little that has any negative impact on most people as a result of being in the Eu
  • eek said:

    Nice to see George Osborne agrees with me that any leader of an anti-no deal government will probably be a Labour figure:

    https://twitter.com/msmithsonpb/status/1172213753938665478?s=21

    It only says it will need to be someone 'acceptable' to the Labour leader. It would probably be a Labour MP, but not necessarily.

    That leaves quite a scope.
    And I will continue to bet on Margaret Beckett as most acceptable
    Labour is interested in party political advantage.

    It might calculate an interim PM that would do the most damage to the Conservative cause would be a Conservative.
  • JohnO said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
    ..with a silent predator with razor sharp teeth just inches away, and perfectly camouflaged.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    One of the big questions is: will Labour finally support PR after the next election?
  • FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047

    Oliver Letwin’s interview must be read by anyone betting for or against a 2019 election.

    That'll be me then.

    I've said a couple of times over the last few days that I think this Parliament won't ever cobble together enough votes to pass a Deal, except in extremis with an imminent No Deal looming, and that given a further GE would be likely indecisive, a referendum to 're-instruct' the Commons what to do is the only way forward.

    So, yes, I expect an extension to June (earliest) to December (latest) next year, with a referendum in the Spring or early Summer. The WA to pass or Brexit to be revoked and, then, a GE2020.
    Spot on
  • nichomar said:

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Who is going to complain revoke get it over with return to normal and sort out real problems there is very little that has any negative impact on most people as a result of being in the Eu
    Not sure i understand what youre trying to say here,

    Perhaps it is "advisory".
  • GIN1138 said:

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    Well if Remainers would stop playing games we could have an election to either endorse Boris or reject him.
    Why should a man installed by the Conservative party without reference to anyone else who has yet to win a vote in the Commons be entitled to an election at a time of his convenience?
  • AndyJS said:

    O/T

    "Why Geoffrey Boycott should keep his knighthood
    In a civilised society, we don’t punish people forever for their past mistakes.
    Brendan O'Neill"

    https://www.spiked-online.com/author/brendan-oneill/

    Is not getting a knighthood a form of punishment? What have I done to deserve my not-a-knighthood then? Has he ever admitted to doing it? Or shown the slightest remorse? Has he even been, actually, er punished for it? (All QTWTAIN, apparently).
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    Says who?
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    edited September 2019
    nichomar said:

    It’s interesting that possibly Johnson didn’t lie to Brenda because she said ok boris whatever you want

    I have been thinking about this. Prorogation is automatic. Government decides; Queen requires. But there will be a formulaic justification. A bit like those "business justification" boxes you have to fill in on a purchase order. As long as it makes sense you can write in more or less what you want.

    So the government asks the Queen for prorogation. She or her advisor asks, what's the basis? So Johnson or whoever it was explains, it's time for a new Queens Speech, which means prorogation. It goes over the conference season, making the prorogation a bit longer than usual. It passes the plausibility test and no-one is interested because it's an automatic act.

    However, Johnson didn't in this scenario explain to the Queen that conference breaks are managed through recess, which is under the control of parliament, who were intending to sit throughout. When the fuss kicks up the Queen feels Johnson deliberately misled her by withholding material information. It won't come out into the public but there's a serious breach of trust.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    edited September 2019

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
    I am glad that you have seen the light, I recall you being quite scathing when I suggested a #peoplesvote was needed, and quite winnable by Leave.

    See you on the march, Oct 19th :)
  • valleyboy said:

    valleyboy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    There has been polling evidence that women are not as keen on Boris as men, and the row with Carrie a few weeks back will not have helped. With this in mind probably Boris was not over-impressed by the party's new knighthoods for wifebeaters campaign.

    My wife cannot stand the man. Neither can my sister. And my mother hates him.
    I have just one niece and she is none too keen. Thinks he's a dick. So does my son's girlfriend. I also have a couple of close female friends and they reckon he's pretty ghastly.

    That's 100% of my close female F&F and it's 100% negative. Boris has no chance with any of them. Neither will he get their votes in the upcoming election.
    The latest Yougov has 33% of women voting Tory but only 31% of men, though the LDs have the highest percentage of female voters of the main parties.

    Labour and the Brexit Party have more male than female voters

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/11/voting-intention-con-32-lab-23-lib-dem-19-brex-14-
    Ps was subjected to listening to a loud and lengthy phone conversation in a coffee shop yesterday. What Boris was called was everything but a gentleman.. Cant recall such vitriol even in the Thatcher years.
    Ps apart from myself, my wife, daughter and son in law think Johnson is an idiot. Am working on my 4 year old grandson!
    You sound like a disinterested witness!
    Lol
    Laugh out loud or lots of love?

    Both are equally irrelevant.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    Says who?
    Good point. Lets have a referendum to find out.
  • beentheredonethatbeentheredonethat Posts: 838
    edited September 2019







    Keep your hair on. I called you a dipstick as I thought it a fairly mild indicator of someone who is being rather silly. I am sure I would say it to your face, or is that a typically Neanderthal macho threat from the type that has taken over my ex-party?

    The rule of law is one of the most fundamental principles of a free society. The far right that has taken over the Conservative Party cares not a jot for it. the fact that we have a PM who encourages people to think he shares such an outrageous position is dangerous indeed. The fact that anyone who can write their name thinks it is OK for a PM to break the law in such a way I a sad indictment of our education system.

    Actually an insult is an insult. Criticising what I or anyone has to say is fair comment. However I have found, unfailingly, that people who insult you personally on the internet are people who hide behind their keyboards. I did not threaten you. I don’t threaten people. Nor am I macho or a Neanderthal.
    I am not a member of your ex party and have no intention of becoming one. Frankly what it has done since Maastricht has only served to make it a very weird club with the majority of MPs and MEPs talking euroscepticism whilst being europhile. I have dealt with and known quite a few and I have seen at first hand their attitudes to the grassroots. The party membership has therefore expected its Government to negotiate a reasonable exit from the EU. This it failed to do. Therefore they reacted as people do when thwarted.
    If you have, as I expect you have, been to conference then you would have seen that the most popular speakers at fringe events are generally those who are now called europhobes by the Clarkite wing of the party. There is a good reason for this. The Conservative Party sold itself as a party of euroscepticism and attracted eurosceptics.

    Now they are paying the price. They have the leader who told them he would stand up to the EU. They rejected the candidate who they thought was no different to previous incumbents. Perhaps your ex party should have elected a leader who voted leave in the first place.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
    This is what happens when a referendum is won with a campaign of xenophobic lies. No one is interested in compromise afterwards.

    No one is making the case for a deal. It’s hard to see who will now.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,291

    JohnO said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
    ..with a silent predator with razor sharp teeth just inches away, and perfectly camouflaged.
    So you too have encountered vicious semi-deranged gerbils: it ain't pleasant.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited September 2019

    But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.

    Commons would ignore any such "instruction" just as they have ignored our original "instruction"
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    phiw said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    In one of my ill-fated local council elections, I had my finger bitten by a dog while pushing one of my obligatory 'candidate points at pothole' newsletters through one of those that closed on me.

    Went to A&E and the nurse told me never to do that again.

    There endeth my political career.
    Yeesh. I hope it was at least an important pothole that you nearly lost a finger for.

    I presume people really do like canvassing though - I know people who are still pounding the streets after decades of party service, and I just cannot imagine duty alone compeling them to do it.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    AndyJS said:

    O/T

    "Why Geoffrey Boycott should keep his knighthood
    In a civilised society, we don’t punish people forever for their past mistakes.
    Brendan O'Neill"

    https://www.spiked-online.com/author/brendan-oneill/

    Is not getting a knighthood a form of punishment? What have I done to deserve my not-a-knighthood then? Has he ever admitted to doing it? Or shown the slightest remorse? Has he even been, actually, er punished for it? (All QTWTAIN, apparently).
    Boycott got a substantial fine and a three month suspended sentence, so it is fair to say he has been punished. Remorse, however, or even acknowledgement, has been lacking.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Scott_P said:
    Well it is certainly true that everyone knows the real reason for the prorogation, it's presumably just a question of whether being shifty about the real reason is indeed unlawful as the scottish judges think.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited September 2019
    JohnO said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
    Haven't they recently passed a law to prevent that in future?

    Who says politicians only focus on Brexit?

    Edit: Turns out it is not law yet - best hold off that election until late next year.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47457758
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    AndyJS said:

    One of the big questions is: will Labour finally support PR after the next election?

    Not if the LDs get close to their percentage share!
  • NEW THREAD

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    kle4 said:

    JohnO said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
    Haven't they recently passed a law to prevent that in future?

    Who says politicians only focus on Brexit?

    Edit: Turns out it is not law yet - best hold off that election until late next year.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47457758
    Only for new houses though.

    Always use a posting stick...
  • .



    Research like this you mean?

    "The British Election Study is pleased to announce the release of wave 15 of the British Election Study Internet Panel. Wave 15 was conducted in March 2019, immediately before the original Brexit deadline."
    https://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-resources/bes-internet-panel-wave-15-data-released/#.XXp-TC5KgdU

    Can you really be claiming that the data is from after March 2019, given that the chart in the header that you published with your thread states "Source: BES Internet Panel Wave 15 (March 2019)"?

    No, I'm pointing out the previous other waves show similar things, so that covers periods with huge Tory leads, and no Tory leads whatsoever
    So, what you're saying is that your BES March 2019 data shows little appetite for 2017 Labour voters to vote Tory (which I accept), you accept my point that the data is well out of date, but you're saying that that doesn't matter because (you claim that) even earlier data showed much the same pattern and the data set is therefore inherently stable. Hence you infer that the current position must still be much the same, although there is no recent BES data available to test that.

    The only problem with your conclusion is that current data contradicts it, and moreover shows big shifts over the past 6 months.

    Compare the pattern in the Opinium data from March 2019, with that from September 2019. In March, only 4% of 2017 Labour Leave voters (and only 2% of 2017 Labour Remain voters) had switched to the Conservatives. Now, in September 2019, 22% of 2019 Labour Leave (and 1% of Labour Remain voters) have switched to Conservative.

    That is a big recent switch of Labour Leave voters to the Conservatives, and it is even more significant when you consider that back in March there was no Brexit Party to hoover up their disaffection as an alternative to the Tories. Taken as a group, in a forced choice Labour Leavers as a whole also now prefer Johnson to Corbyn as PM by 36% to 24%, so there is plenty to infer that the 19% who have switched to the BXP are just as likely to eventually vote Con as they are to vote Lab. Again that's in complete contrast to March 2019, when only 11% of Labour Leavers preferred May and 30% preferred Corbyn in the same two way choice.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    JohnO said:

    JohnO said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    ...And the unspeakable curs who place their letterboxes at the very bottom of the door.
    ..with a silent predator with razor sharp teeth just inches away, and perfectly camouflaged.
    So you too have encountered vicious semi-deranged gerbils: it ain't pleasant.
    But at least these UKIP fanatics are almost extinct ....
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,798
    edited September 2019
    Foxy said:

    AndyJS said:

    O/T

    "Why Geoffrey Boycott should keep his knighthood
    In a civilised society, we don’t punish people forever for their past mistakes.
    Brendan O'Neill"

    https://www.spiked-online.com/author/brendan-oneill/

    Is not getting a knighthood a form of punishment? What have I done to deserve my not-a-knighthood then? Has he ever admitted to doing it? Or shown the slightest remorse? Has he even been, actually, er punished for it? (All QTWTAIN, apparently).
    Boycott got a substantial fine and a three month suspended sentence, so it is fair to say he has been punished. Remorse, however, or even acknowledgement, has been lacking.
    I didn't know about the fine, I knew he hadn't spent any time in the nick. I have seen photos of his partner's face, it is pretty hard to imagine you could get that from falling over, as he claims, and the absence of a custodial sentence seems generous, considering.
    (Edit: but not as generous as a fucking knighthood, obvs).
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    isam said:
    There's a case for EEA style association with the EU. In fairness I should say several of the statements in that table are questionable or bogus.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    Says who?
    Say the arrogant fucks like Meeks who only believe in democracy when they are winning.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502

    Where in Letwin's undertakings to the good people of West Dorset in 2017 did he say he would propose a second referendum?

    And where was the mandate for no deal .

    If Leavers are happy to reinvent the 2016 EU referendum why should Remainers like Letwin honour the 2017 manifesto .

  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    kle4 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Well it is certainly true that everyone knows the real reason for the prorogation, it's presumably just a question of whether being shifty about the real reason is indeed unlawful as the scottish judges think.
    I thought the Government in response to the stop the prorogation of parliament petetion said it was due to leaving the EU on 31st October. People even tweeted about it showing the quote! I wonder if it will be commented in the SC next week. :wink:
  • kle4 said:

    phiw said:

    .

    kinabalu said:

    You are looking for Brenda from Bristol.

    Yep. We need to know how she is voting and also Mrs Duffy.

    That gives us the result of the election - perhaps even the seat totals.

    You can stick your yougovs up your arse.
    Nah, we need David Herdson to go canvassing.
    I really hate canvassing. Never enjoyed it.

    I mean, there's something frightfully un-British about hassling someone on the doorstep. Now and again, I have a very interesting conversation. Other times people are very rude. It's terrifying ringing the doorbell.

    I do it out of duty.
    To be honest what I won't miss is those snapback letterboxes that guillotine your fingers.
    In one of my ill-fated local council elections, I had my finger bitten by a dog while pushing one of my obligatory 'candidate points at pothole' newsletters through one of those that closed on me.

    Went to A&E and the nurse told me never to do that again.

    There endeth my political career.
    Yeesh. I hope it was at least an important pothole that you nearly lost a finger for.

    I presume people really do like canvassing though - I know people who are still pounding the streets after decades of party service, and I just cannot imagine duty alone compeling them to do it.
    TMay is said to really like canvassing and even when she was PM would be out on the knocker at local elections in her constituency
  • Scott_P said:
    I have a feeling that most efforts to trigger full selection for Labour MPs are going to fail. I recently attended a ward meeting that voted overwhelmingly to reselect our sitting MP, following a massive turnout of usually inactive, centrist dad (and mum) style members like me. Apparently it was the biggest ward meeting (>100 people) in living memory.
  • nico67 said:

    Where in Letwin's undertakings to the good people of West Dorset in 2017 did he say he would propose a second referendum?

    And where was the mandate for no deal .

    If Leavers are happy to reinvent the 2016 EU referendum why should Remainers like Letwin honour the 2017 manifesto .

    The question of what sort of deal should be negotiated wasnt asked. The question was merely "remain" or "leave".

    As i said earlier, everything else is sophistry.
  • I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
    This is what happens when a referendum is won with a campaign of xenophobic lies. No one is interested in compromise afterwards.

    No one is making the case for a deal. It’s hard to see who will now.
    "Xenophobic lies".

    This is the language of the kindergarden.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
    This is what happens when a referendum is won with a campaign of xenophobic lies. No one is interested in compromise afterwards.

    No one is making the case for a deal. It’s hard to see who will now.
    "Xenophobic lies".

    This is the language of the kindergarden.
    No.

    It’s the language of the spoiled kids corner of the kindergarten.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478

    I suspect many people will see any such revocation as "advisory". Indeed there is a case for seeing the appointment of an interim government as solely "advisory" (no one voted for an interim government led by Ken Clarke, Corbyn or anyone else for that matter..)

    I can see good reason for considering any votes within (or indeed acts of) Parliament from now on as being "advisory". I shall consider at some length with Mrs Basicbridge which ones i feel are worthy of support (as reflected by opinion polls carried out in mr and Mrs Bascicbridge's residence) and may also consider abiding (or not abiding) by them subject to that endorsement.

    Remainers are sowing dragons' teeth...

    No one voted for Boris Johnson.
    As you have said. More than once. But what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,

    Parliament is at odds with the largest national vote in the UKs history and has reneged on its undertaking to respect that. All else is sophistry.

    Leavers have found their prospectus undeliverable. It turns out we don’t hold all the cards.

    It’s time for a rethink.
    It isn't undeliverable. Far from it. But there isn't a majority in the Commons to pass a Deal. Probably any Deal.

    It's my belief that with a properly run campaign the electorate would provide those instructions to vote for one back to the Commons very clearly.
    This is what happens when a referendum is won with a campaign of xenophobic lies. No one is interested in compromise afterwards.

    No one is making the case for a deal. It’s hard to see who will now.
    "Xenophobic lies".

    This is the language of the kindergarden.
    I've heard 'lies' used in a kindergarten, albeit rarely. Never 'xenophobic'.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    nico67 said:

    Where in Letwin's undertakings to the good people of West Dorset in 2017 did he say he would propose a second referendum?

    And where was the mandate for no deal .

    If Leavers are happy to reinvent the 2016 EU referendum why should Remainers like Letwin honour the 2017 manifesto .

    The question of what sort of deal should be negotiated wasnt asked. The question was merely "remain" or "leave".

    As i said earlier, everything else is sophistry.
    You keep using that word, but I have seen no evidence yet you understand its meaning.
This discussion has been closed.