There is a widespread assumption, based on what happened with Theresa May two and a half years ago, that prime ministers still have the power to the name election date in spite of the FTPA. This is because it is said that the main opposition party will always have to back holding an election or else it will look weak.
Comments
That also appears to be the initial plan for next week onwards.
No matter how many times he says it HYFUD simply isn't correct to say VONC is the only way to prevent no deal. The PM's hands can be tied by legislation, and Parliament can seize control of its own timetable and legislate without him.
All in an afternoon.
Fortunately, MPs aren't that smart.
Surely it would be an even bigger campaigning point that Corbyn and Labour had proven themselves to be craven cowards and liars by shirking an election for which they have claimed to be desperate for the last two years!
I never thought I'd say this but thank goodness for John Bercow - someone to curtail the power grab by unlecected 'Cumming and the PM without a mandate. They might be HYUFD's pin up boys but they are acting like dictators.
Whatever you think of the Conservative party , they know how to stay in power.
The Queen appointed Boris not Bercow her Chief Minister in July
https://twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/1163041029962031104
There are very valid reasons for Labour to delay things until say February if we leave with No Deal...
And declaring himself LotO.
3 years after Leave won the referendum Brexit will be delivered
NB “unconstitutional” is suspending democracy, as your hero repeatedly refuses to rule out trying to do.
Anyone acting as a defacto leader needs to prevent no deal, but must also prevent no brexit by agreeing a deal with the EU. Anything else is just wrong for democracy
So no deal it is , therefore Farage and the Brexit Party, have achieved their aim.
So no requirement in a GE to stand against the Conservative party.
Scratch that, I guess that was one of Boles' plans and Lucas' too.
We have to start from where we are, which is a bad place. There is no mandate for no deal Brexit or for revoke. No one seriously wants to try for a different deal. So a fresh mandate is needed. It’s not good but all the other options are worse.
And even if it happens afterwards and BXP do not stand, what point is there in voting for the Tories once Brexit has been acheived? They no longer care about the Union (not enough at any rate, they would happily sacrifice it for Brexit) nor do they have any way to distinguishing themselves from Labour in the splashing cash around stakes.
Boris has a clear position but his opposition are divided and at this rate the remain vote will dilute between labour, lib dems, greens, snp and plaid
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html
However, I agree no one seems to seriously want to try for a different deal - the 'do or die' attitude makes that plain, by effectively ruling out even a good new deal in time - and that we have to start where we are, not where we wish we were, whether one is coming from a remainer or a leaver perspective. As much as I don't think mandate matters in this anymore, seeking something to present as a mandate seems the only way to even potentially get the present situation to change.
It might not, which is why I'd much rather our present MPs do the admittedly very hard job they were asked to do for a very divided country, and come up with something without coming back to us, particularly when we know plenty of them won't respond to a 'wrong' answer, but something has to change.
That would be pleasing, in many ways. I'm fairly sure that what they mean by Not leaving without a deal (but not that deal) is they actually mean to Remain.
Good evening, everyone.
F*ck me.
I think Boris would do anything if he thinks it will give him more time as PM, and as his time is dependent on securing or being seen to try to secure no deal, he would consider any action to do so. That his adoring supporters are fully committed to justifying anything including prorogation means it cannot be ruled out.
The queen no longer has any power to dissolve Parliament. Parliament can only be dissolved under one of the three ways specified by the FPTA: automatically after five years, on the vote of 2/3 of MPs for an early election, or fourteen days after a VONC with no subsequent VOC having been passed. Actually, strictly speaking those three ways trigger the process of setting a date for a new general election, and Parliament is dissolved twenty-five working days before that date.
These things have evolved in a way that broadly works.
There is a very simple process available to Parliament if they don’t like the executive’s policy: a VONC.
Everything else is bullshit because they don’t want to follow the rules
No deal as part of negotiation is every day practice but there comes a moment when no deal is lunacy.
That happens on the 31st October unless the EU come up with a deal or the HOC finds a way to mitigate it
Trying to force Brexit through before an election means you aren't really confident it is the will of the people anyway.
Frit.
The choice was “leave” or “remain”
A mandate was given to leave
Just because people who disagree with that have tried to do everything in their power to stop it (except the thing that is actually in their power) doesn’t weaken the mandate
The opposition is divided ,to the extent that without the Brexit Party standing, Johnson wins a healthy majority.
He is enjoying being PM too much and to be honest Boris will do what is in the interest of Boris not what you may be hearing.
Of course ideally for Boris the HOC could tie his hands and he could well be relieved and act accordingly
If Lab MPs didn't back their leader by voting for an election then the party would look hopelessly split.
Then if Boris really wants an election all he has to do is ask for a small extension..