Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » At this critical time reflections on “Cultivating Democracy”

124»

Comments

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited July 2019
    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    Sending man to the moon was magnificent pointlessness. Brexit is just pointless.

    I have to say Johnson's writing does have panache. No idea what people see him in him as a politician, but many people apparently do rate him.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,391

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    The alternative theory which has gained traction over the years is the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. It was just smoke and mirrors. Maybe the NASA reference is just another clever coded Brexit message from Johnson?
    '...gained traction over the years...' with flat-earthers and conspiracy theorists.
    Some say ( not me) it was all the work of Stanley Kubrick.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    Boris Johnson: Ignore the pessimists - if we can put a man on the moon, we can solve the Northern Irish border problem

    Boris Johnson has insisted Britain can leave the EU with a deal by October 31 if the country rediscovers its “sense of mission” ahead of his expected coronation as Tory leader on Monday.

    The front-runner to succeed Theresa May said that if man could find a way to get to the moon and back 50 years ago, “we certainly have the technology” to solve the Northern Irish border problem - the one thing standing in the way of a Brexit deal.

    Writing in Monday's Telegraph, he says: “It is time this country recovered some its can-do spirit. We can come out of the EU on October 31, and yes, we certainly have the technology to do so. What we need now is the will and the drive.”


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/boris-johnson-ignore-pessimists-can-put-man-moon-can-solve/

    You see: that was all Theresa May needed: a can-do spirit! FFS. Fiona's spaff some money on some geeks had more detail.

    But we did not go to the moon. NASA did.
    Why couldn't we build a garden bridge across the Thames?
    Same reason we haven't Brexited... ultimately it became obvious it was a pointless, stupid, expensive folly.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    The alternative theory which has gained traction over the years is the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. It was just smoke and mirrors. Maybe the NASA reference is just another clever coded Brexit message from Johnson?
    '...gained traction over the years...' with flat-earthers and conspiracy theorists.
    Some say ( not me) it was all the work of Stanley Kubrick.
    There are some very dumb people out there (not you).
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,391

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    The alternative theory which has gained traction over the years is the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. It was just smoke and mirrors. Maybe the NASA reference is just another clever coded Brexit message from Johnson?
    '...gained traction over the years...' with flat-earthers and conspiracy theorists.
    Some say ( not me) it was all the work of Stanley Kubrick.
    There are some very dumb people out there (not you).
    Oh I don't know, I try my best!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited July 2019
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    The self belief was necessary. But so was careful and diligent analysis of the problem and many man hours of thought and work.
    There are plenty of highly intelligent people e.g. Dominic Cummings, who spent not just hours but years of hard work preparing for Brexit and in Boris they will finally have a PM prepared to listen to then and believe in Brexit rather than see it as a damage limitation exercise
    What was this 'frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere' Boris was talking about... was it in fact, like most of the rest of the stuff he spouts, just bollocks?
    ‘frictionless’ and ‘hand-knitted code’ ? Utter balls, yes.

    System software was stored in woven ‘rope memory -
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_rope_memory
    - but the software was highly sophisticated and exhaustively planned over years. Its design principles became a model for reliable software engineering.

    I’m struggling to see any correspondence to the rolling mess that is Brexit.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    He's gonna make Hunt an offer he has to refuse?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,391
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    Could I interest you in a consignment of best quality tariff free snake oil?
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Clearly the hot take will be Harris surging to 16%.
    Rather that she possibly has more to win, and more to lose than any other candidate in the debates at the end of this month.
    The three in front of her are more established in voters’ minds, Biden and Sanders far more so. She could have a further surge, justifying her current betting odds, or be back in the chasing pack with Buttigieg.
    An important dynamic with this race is that, for the September debates, the "entrance requirements" have doubled.

    The consequence of which is that only five candidates have definitely qualified for them (Biden, Harris, Warren, Sanders and Buttigieg), and then there are two or three with a chance (O'Rourke, Kloubacher, Castro).

    We could go from two debates with twenty candidates, to one debate with five or six.

    I also suspect that those who do not qualify for the September debate, are effectively out the race.
    If O’Rourke goes out, who inherits all those Texas votes ? Buttigieg, I think, polled as his followers’ second preference, but he might well not be in the race at that point, either.

    Warren has some hard thinking to do on policy. Thus far, she’s more or less managed ambiguity on several issues, but I think will get targeted on this come the next debate.
    Buttigieg has already qualified for the September debates, O'Rourke has not.

    Also, Buttigieg topped the fundraising charts in Q2, raising $25m (2.5x what Harris pulled in and 5x O'Rourke), so I don't think he's dropping out any time soon.
    Bernie topped the charts
    Bernie has raised the biggest sums in total, but in Q2 he was fourth behind Buttigieg, Biden and Warren.

    See: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-democratic-presidential-candidate-campaign-finance/
    I was going based on politico's tracker. Not sure why the disparity.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    So the ambition is now the dismantling of the worldwide trading system, not just our relationship with the EU ?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit of self belief, something we sorely need now
    It didn't just take a "lot of self belief". It took seven years and a carefully thought out sequence of events. they had to work out how to track over space, navigate in space, rendevous in space, how to build a rocket big enough to do it, how to build computers to do it. They did this by "all-up testing": keep tight control of testing, coming up with a best guess, launching a small rocket, note the problems, fix them, do it again only bigger, iterate until a solution, do a rehearsal (Apollo 10), then do it for realz.

    What they didn't do is build a very big fully-equipped Saturn V at the beginning and launch it, hoping they got everything right. Do you know who did do that? The Soviets. Would you like to see the footage of their moon rocket, the N1? They looked like this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iuo3J8L9b8
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    I think it was Classics wasn't it. (like Bernard from Yes, minister)
    I believe you. :(
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Will actually be genuinely fascinating to see Boris' Cabinet. There are going to be some fuming back benchers whichever way it goes, that is for sure.
  • ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,843
    Just voted in lib dem leadership election (very last minute!). Difficult to choose but went for Davey in the end. My instinct is that he will appeal more to the kind of remainer home county tories that could be very important in next election, he comes across as a bit more of a 'serious/sensible' type, the experienced candidate. Also felt like he came across a bit more naturally in the debates (not more 'charismatic' as such, but a bit more natural)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited July 2019
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
    Sad to see diehard Remaineritis getting to you Topping as a Brexiteer finally gets to No 10
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    So the ambition is now the dismantling of the worldwide trading system, not just our relationship with the EU ?
    No, the ambition is Brexit and no hard border in Ireland
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    My instinct is that he will appeal more to the kind of remainer home county tories that could be very important in next election

    Bonjour. Not home counties but yes to the general drift.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
    Sad to see diehard Rwmaineritis getting to you Topping as a Brexiteer finally gets to No 10
    And quickly discovers how difficult it is.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
    Sad to see diehard Rwmaineritis getting to you Topping as a Brexiteer finally gets to No 10
    Thus speaks a remainer. You are a remainer me duck. Twist and turn all you like but you are a diehard remainer and not welcome in the conservative party.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    dixiedean said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    He's gonna make Hunt an offer he has to refuse?
    Don Boriseone
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,490
    There is going to be a customs border in NI, it just needs to be one that doesn't have physical infrastructure of a type that can be targeted by terrorists.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
    Sad to see diehard Rwmaineritis getting to you Topping as a Brexiteer finally gets to No 10
    Thus speaks a remainer. You are a remainer me duck. Twist and turn all you like but you are a diehard remainer and not welcome in the conservative party.
    Any Remainer who respects democracy and now wants to see Brexit delivered is welcome in the Tory Party
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    Corbyn losing members. Makes a leadership challenge possible, even likely, in the coming months.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,391

    There is going to be a customs border in NI, it just needs to be one that doesn't have physical infrastructure of a type that can be targeted by terrorists.

    Uh?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    _Anazina_ said:

    Corbyn losing members. Makes a leadership challenge possible, even likely, in the coming months.

    Yet still only 2/5 of Labour members want him to stand down before the next general election
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited July 2019

    Just wondering who will be the favourite for next Conservative leader when they close the book on the current contest. Phil Hammond must be worth a punt at the right price.

    He wouldn't be worth a punt at any price, unfortunately. The party has gone completely bonkers and it's certainly not going to come to its senses in time to be willing to hear disagreeable truths for at least five years, and probably not for a decade or more.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    Moron.
    Sad to see diehard Rwmaineritis getting to you Topping as a Brexiteer finally gets to No 10
    Thus speaks a remainer. You are a remainer me duck. Twist and turn all you like but you are a diehard remainer and not welcome in the conservative party.
    Any Remainer who respects democracy and now wants to see Brexit delivered is welcome in the Tory Party
    So you think they welcome a diehard remainer like you? I doubt it.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238
    HYUFD said:

    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    What are the WTO going to do? Invade Northern Ireland to build a hard border?

    In any case given Trump's view of the WTO it is not exactly punching with much weight at the moment
    So the ambition is now the dismantling of the worldwide trading system, not just our relationship with the EU ?
    No, the ambition is Brexit and no hard border in Ireland
    Like Boris’s frictionless re-entry, a thing of faith rather than reality.

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    HYUFD said:

    dixiedean said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    He's gonna make Hunt an offer he has to refuse?
    Don Boriseone
    Jeez: Boris is going to be even worse than I anticipated ......
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
    The UK can't have a hard border whoever's fault. Hence all the Boris crap is just that, crap.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    I dislike Boris, and the things said during the campaign would be a petty reason for it (and with Boris, as per Trump, I get the impression the pettier things are what drive him), but moving Hunt at the least seems reasonable whether he wins by a large margin or a stonkingly large margin. They are probably not as far apart on Brexit as some think, but Boris should reasonably have someone in tune with him on the subject at the Foreign Office. If not for the current situation I feel like it wouldn't even be in doubt.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238

    Just wondering who will be the favourite for next Conservative leader when they close the book on the current contest. Phil Hammond must be worth a punt at the right price.

    He wouldn't be worth a punt at any price, unfortunately. The party has completely bonkers and it's certainly not going to come to its senses in time to be willing to hear disagreeable truths for at least five years, and probably not for a decade or more.
    Sounds a fair assessment.


  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
    "failing and blaming"

    It's the EU's fault. It's Remainer's fault. It's Remainer Conservative's fault. It's Hammond's fault. It's May's fault. It's the BBC's fault. It's the Irish's fault. Or the Germans. Or the Poles. Or the French. It's Barnier's fault. It's Congress's fault. It's the Civil Services's fault. It's Ollie's fault. It's the fault of people who don't believe.

    It's always somebody else's fault.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Cyclefree said:

    HYUFD said:

    dixiedean said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    He's gonna make Hunt an offer he has to refuse?
    Don Boriseone
    Jeez: Boris is going to be even worse than I anticipated ......
    I suspect in the end Boris will have to make Hunt Deputy PM as well as Business Secretary to unify the party even if he replaces him as Foreign Secretary.

    In 1980 Reagan for example did not want to make his main rival for the GOP nomination, George Bush Snr, his Vice Presidential nominee telling advisers 'Do I have to?' Yet in the end he reluctantly agreed to unify the party.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Boris Johnson: Ignore the pessimists - if we can put a man on the moon, we can solve the Northern Irish border problem

    Boris Johnson has insisted Britain can leave the EU with a deal by October 31 if the country rediscovers its “sense of mission” ahead of his expected coronation as Tory leader on Monday.

    The front-runner to succeed Theresa May said that if man could find a way to get to the moon and back 50 years ago, “we certainly have the technology” to solve the Northern Irish border problem - the one thing standing in the way of a Brexit deal.

    Writing in Monday's Telegraph, he says: “It is time this country recovered some its can-do spirit. We can come out of the EU on October 31, and yes, we certainly have the technology to do so. What we need now is the will and the drive.”


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/boris-johnson-ignore-pessimists-can-put-man-moon-can-solve/

    You see: that was all Theresa May needed: a can-do spirit! FFS. Fiona's spaff some money on some geeks had more detail.

    But we did not go to the moon. NASA did.
    Why couldn't we build a garden bridge across the Thames?
    Same reason we haven't Brexited... ultimately it became obvious it was a pointless, stupid, expensive folly.
    That is not the reason we have not Brexited. If it were the reason, and obviously so to boot, we'd already be in a situation where there was sufficient support to overturn the law making it still on the cards, or at least set in motion a means of doing so.

    We might well get there as more people come to believe those reasons, but the reason we have not Brexited is because a few people came to see that (joining those who already did) and a whole bunch of others are unsatisfiable.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    Good grief, what utter bollocks he writes!
    Are you referring to just that post, or his posts in general?
    He writes and talks bollocks all the time. OK for a columnist. Disastrous in a PM.

    Belief in Brexit, my arse.... this is Britain's new religion. All you have to do is believe. Laws, regulations, practicalities, plans - all can be ignored provided you have belief.

    Utter twaddle the lot of it.

    Amusing were it not for the fact that this twat is playing with people's lives and jobs and futures.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    The alternative theory which has gained traction over the years is the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. It was just smoke and mirrors. Maybe the NASA reference is just another clever coded Brexit message from Johnson?
    '...gained traction over the years...' with flat-earthers and conspiracy theorists.
    Something something belief in something is all you need not proof something something no need for experts.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238
    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
    If it happens, we’ll spend the next decade arguing about whose fault it was.
    But we will suffer our share of the fallout irrespective of that.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Huge thread on why the Dem Leadership "let's talk about health are" strategy won't work.

    https://twitter.com/timjacobwise/status/1152930670093787141?s=19
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,391
    Cyclefree said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/07/21/need-can-do-spirit-1960s-america-help-us-get-eu/

    Good grief, what utter bollocks he writes!
    Are you referring to just that post, or his posts in general?
    He writes and talks bollocks all the time. OK for a columnist. Disastrous in a PM.

    Belief in Brexit, my arse.... this is Britain's new religion. All you have to do is believe. Laws, regulations, practicalities, plans - all can be ignored provided you have belief.

    Utter twaddle the lot of it.

    Amusing were it not for the fact that this twat is playing with people's lives and jobs and futures.
    I am sure when one is as important and invincibls as Mr Johnson the lives, jobs and fufures of mere serfs really don't count.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    https://twitter.com/chelleryn99/status/1152585540451164160

    Presumably you should vote for one of the candidates with a stronger pro Israel position, which makes them more Jewish than Bernie...
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Clearly the hot take will be Harris surging to 16%.
    Rather that she possibly has more to win, and more to lose than any other candidate in the debates at the end of this month.
    The three in front of her are more established in voters’ minds, Biden and Sanders far more so. She could have a further surge, justifying her current betting odds, or be back in the chasing pack with Buttigieg.
    An important dynamic with this race is that, for the September debates, the "entrance requirements" have doubled.

    The consequence of which is that only five candidates have definitely qualified for them (Biden, Harris, Warren, Sanders and Buttigieg), and then there are two or three with a chance (O'Rourke, Kloubacher, Castro).

    We could go from two debates with twenty candidates, to one debate with five or six.

    I also suspect that those who do not qualify for the September debate, are effectively out the race.
    If O’Rourke goes out, who inherits all those Texas votes ? Buttigieg, I think, polled as his followers’ second preference, but he might well not be in the race at that point, either.

    Warren has some hard thinking to do on policy. Thus far, she’s more or less managed ambiguity on several issues, but I think will get targeted on this come the next debate.
    Buttigieg has already qualified for the September debates, O'Rourke has not.

    Also, Buttigieg topped the fundraising charts in Q2, raising $25m (2.5x what Harris pulled in and 5x O'Rourke), so I don't think he's dropping out any time soon.
    Bernie topped the charts
    Bernie has raised the biggest sums in total, but in Q2 he was fourth behind Buttigieg, Biden and Warren.

    See: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-democratic-presidential-candidate-campaign-finance/
    I was going based on politico's tracker. Not sure why the disparity.
    Ah, politico's including money that Bernie transferred in from past Senate and presidential campaigns. So in terms of actual fundraising you're right, he's fourth.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,534

    Nope, politicians are just as capable of spouting bullshit as Cox.
    It's a really good programme. WEish we could have Timmermans in this country!
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    I dislike Boris, and the things said during the campaign would be a petty reason for it (and with Boris, as per Trump, I get the impression the pettier things are what drive him), but moving Hunt at the least seems reasonable whether he wins by a large margin or a stonkingly large margin. They are probably not as far apart on Brexit as some think, but Boris should reasonably have someone in tune with him on the subject at the Foreign Office. If not for the current situation I feel like it wouldn't even be in doubt.
    Hunt should tell him to get stuffed. Has he no self-respect? Why should he agree to be demoted? And if the reason is because Boris is too petty to take criticism all the more reason not to have such a man as his boss.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,534
    _Anazina_ said:

    Corbyn losing members. Makes a leadership challenge possible, even likely, in the coming months.

    There have always been 40% of the members who weren't Corbyn supporters. There still are, and many feel it more strongly than ever. But the 60-40 proportions haven't changed, so far.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    I dislike Boris, and the things said during the campaign would be a petty reason for it (and with Boris, as per Trump, I get the impression the pettier things are what drive him), but moving Hunt at the least seems reasonable whether he wins by a large margin or a stonkingly large margin. They are probably not as far apart on Brexit as some think, but Boris should reasonably have someone in tune with him on the subject at the Foreign Office. If not for the current situation I feel like it wouldn't even be in doubt.
    Hunt should tell him to get stuffed. Has he no self-respect? Why should he agree to be demoted? And if the reason is because Boris is too petty to take criticism all the more reason not to have such a man as his boss.
    If Boris were smart he'd keep him as FS and de facto DPM...if he were smart.
    Hunt strikes me as the kind you wouldn't want on the back benches. In a quiet way.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    dixiedean said:

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    I dislike Boris, and the things said during the campaign would be a petty reason for it (and with Boris, as per Trump, I get the impression the pettier things are what drive him), but moving Hunt at the least seems reasonable whether he wins by a large margin or a stonkingly large margin. They are probably not as far apart on Brexit as some think, but Boris should reasonably have someone in tune with him on the subject at the Foreign Office. If not for the current situation I feel like it wouldn't even be in doubt.
    Hunt should tell him to get stuffed. Has he no self-respect? Why should he agree to be demoted? And if the reason is because Boris is too petty to take criticism all the more reason not to have such a man as his boss.
    If Boris were smart he'd keep him as FS and de facto DPM...if he were smart.
    Hunt strikes me as the kind you wouldn't want on the back benches. In a quiet way.
    If this story is true, Boris is not smart. But petty and vindictive. And insecure.

    Frankly, I have no hope. We have a government of stupid people who think belief is all that is needed. We may as well have toddlers believing in fairies in charge.

    There is nothing I can say or do to change matters. Other than wait and use my vote.

    And when I have the chance to campaign against the Tories. They deserve extinction for what they are inflicting on the country.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    _Anazina_ said:

    Corbyn losing members. Makes a leadership challenge possible, even likely, in the coming months.

    There have always been 40% of the members who weren't Corbyn supporters. There still are, and many feel it more strongly than ever. But the 60-40 proportions haven't changed, so far.
    It says 2/5 (40%) want him to go before the next general election but if you read the front page that was tweeted out it says 1 in 4 (25%) want him to step down immediately. The 25% are probably nailed on for a challenger but the other 15% would have to be convinced by the challenger.

    So with a good candidate and a good campaign they could get 40% but it could easily be less.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Cyclefree said:

    dixiedean said:

    Cyclefree said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153051218375323650?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1153052207966773250?s=20

    Davis, Fallon or Cox would be offered Foreign Secretary, Hunt would be offered Business Secretary the Sun reports

    I dislike Boris, and the things said during the campaign would be a petty reason for it (and with Boris, as per Trump, I get the impression the pettier things are what drive him), but moving Hunt at the least seems reasonable whether he wins by a large margin or a stonkingly large margin. They are probably not as far apart on Brexit as some think, but Boris should reasonably have someone in tune with him on the subject at the Foreign Office. If not for the current situation I feel like it wouldn't even be in doubt.
    Hunt should tell him to get stuffed. Has he no self-respect? Why should he agree to be demoted? And if the reason is because Boris is too petty to take criticism all the more reason not to have such a man as his boss.
    If Boris were smart he'd keep him as FS and de facto DPM...if he were smart.
    Hunt strikes me as the kind you wouldn't want on the back benches. In a quiet way.
    If this story is true, Boris is not smart. But petty and vindictive. And insecure.

    Frankly, I have no hope. We have a government of stupid people who think belief is all that is needed. We may as well have toddlers believing in fairies in charge.

    There is nothing I can say or do to change matters. Other than wait and use my vote.

    And when I have the chance to campaign against the Tories. They deserve extinction for what they are inflicting on the country.
    As I said earlier, it will be fascinating. Every Tory MP and their pets is rumoured to have been promised a position.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TOPPING said:

    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
    The UK can't have a hard border whoever's fault. Hence all the Boris crap is just that, crap.
    We can't stop them putting up a hard border. They probably can't put one up, for political reasons, so they probably won't. If they end up having to give ground on the FTA purely so they don't have to worry about the Irish border, so much the better for us. The EU are the ones bluffing there, not the UK.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    Endillion said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    viewcode said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new Prime Minister:

    "If they could use hand-knitted computer code to make a frictionless re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere in 1969, we can solve the problem of frictionless trade at the Northern Irish border."

    It wasn't a frictionless re-entry. In fact, it was a very friction-y re-entry. The Command Module relied on friction with the Earth's atmosphere to slow it down enough to be recaptured by the Earth's gravity. That's why it had a heatshield. So it could survive the ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FRICTION.

    What do they teach people in whatever middle-class arts subject he did?

    Yes and they built that heatshield and got that re entry and went to the moon despite the naysayers with a bit if self belief, something we sorely need now
    And what is our great prize: to successfully inconvenience people on the island of Ireland in order to implement something they didn't vote for? Don't you think this is evidence that we've lost the plot?
    Boris has said quite clearly he will not impose a hard border on the British side in Ireland, whether through technology or other means, if the Republic and EU choose to on their side so be it
    You absolute moron. It won't be the EU or the RoI nor indeed Boris who would impose a border. It might occur under WTO MFN protocols.

    Jesus you and Tyndale so vociferous and yet so fucking ignorant.
    Because the EU wasted the two year article 50 period quibbling about what would happen if we couldn't sign a free trade agreement, rather than actually negotiating said FTA. We don't want a hard border. If one happens it's on the EU's head.
    The UK can't have a hard border whoever's fault. Hence all the Boris crap is just that, crap.
    We can't stop them putting up a hard border. They probably can't put one up, for political reasons, so they probably won't. If they end up having to give ground on the FTA purely so they don't have to worry about the Irish border, so much the better for us. The EU are the ones bluffing there, not the UK.
    You do realise a free trade agreement doesn't remove the requirement of a customs border?
  • There is going to be a customs border in NI, it just needs to be one that doesn't have physical infrastructure of a type that can be targeted by terrorists.

    ... because the terrorists run the smuggling as a source of income. They are criminal gangs who were allowed to do this without interference in return for halting bombings. That's the real reason nobody wants a hard border in Ireland.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,167
    edited July 2019
    Bizarre and strange weather. A cooler night than expected in London, but Paris is still predicted to hit the shocking figure of 43 degrees this week.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/2988507

  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    So Johnson is saying that all is needed to avoid a hard border is “belief”? But also implying that avoiding a hard border is a necessary pre-condition for Brexit? So Brexit isn’t happening?
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Bookmarked.
This discussion has been closed.