Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Farage against the machine. Why the Brexit party’s chances are

SystemSystem Posts: 12,172
edited April 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Farage against the machine. Why the Brexit party’s chances are not as good as billed

Nigel Farage’s second coming has been greeted with fanfares in the media, which love someone who courts publicity and is prepared to do whatever it takes to get it. His gaping maw can be viewed wherever you look, and he has so far been given an unimpeded run for his message that Brexit has been betrayed. His credentials as a strategic genius who delivered Brexit are taken as read. His brilliance as a politician is assumed. The imminent collapse of the current political establishment is expected.  

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • First
  • I agree with Alastair, love the Farage against the machine headline.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133
    Well behind in the polls like the (non)-change party.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,722
    You dis Farage. Don't disparage Farage.
  • ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    You need some new friends....
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884
    There was a young man named Farage
    Who fell to an electoral barrage
    He campaigned so hard
    But let down his guard
    And ended up locked in his garage
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    geoffw said:

    You dis Farage. Don't disparage Farage.

    Disfaragement could be the next Goodwin
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884

    I agree with Alastair, love the Farage against the machine headline.

    It is very punny!
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    geoffw said:

    You dis Farage. Don't disparage Farage.

    With a barrage. In a carriage. In a garage. During a marriage.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,005
    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133

    I agree with Alastair, love the Farage against the machine headline.

    Like rage against the machine, a lot more establishment than they like to let on.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,710
    Fall back on the old "meaningful vote" classic
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    If I may politely disagree with the header. It gives a long list why BP will not succeed in the long term and maybe that is correct. But in the short term it is in demonstrably rude health. You can't get poll figures like that from zero in a short time without having some ability to attract voters.
  • RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I believe the pizzas are called Hawaiians.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019
    Farage is a good campaigner, he took the UKIP party from nowhere to winning the 2014 Euro elections and although he failed himself at least 2 MPs in the 2010-2015 Parliament, including 1 by election and 1 at the 2015-17 Parliament. Under PR rather than FPTP UKIP would have got about 80 MPs at the 2015 GE.

    Cummings may also say it was him who got Leave to 52% but without Farage and UKIP pressuring Cameron there would have been no EU referendum and no anti EU base to build on in the first place.


    It is also difficult for Remainers like Alistair to comprehend the depth and scale of anger from Leavers at the fact we are still in the EU almost 3 years since we voted Leave. Every night canvassing in the local elections I get at least 2 or 3 Leavers saying they 'have voted Tory all their life etc but will not be voting again until we leave or will be voting but only for the Brexit Party nationally'.

    If the Brexit Party comes first in the European elections as it likely that could finally panic MPs into passing the WA, especially if the Brexit Party also lead in Northern and Midlands Labour Leave seats. CUK for the moment is nowhere
  • ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    You need some new friends....
    Yup, but they do offer some great insights on politics.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133
    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Farage winds people up and can make something out of nothing, you have to give him that. Shame he’s dangerously misguided.
  • I don't think any of the above really impacts on the success of the Brexit party. The key factor is whether we leave the EU or not.

    Let's say the Brexit party wins the EU elections and the Tory party panics and appoints a hard Brexiteer. I would then expect the Tory party ratings to recover and the Brexit party to fall back. If we finally leave (by what ever means) I would expect the Brexit party to fade away like UKIP did.

    Now, if, on the other hand, the Tory MPs appoint another remainer and we end up not leaving, either by another massive extension or plain revocation, then I would expect to see the Brexit party to do really well and we would see mass defections (certainly at local level from the Cons)

    In many ways I see the Brexit Party as a pressure group that will have an inverse relationship to the likelihood of Brexit happening.

    I can't really see much of a future for CUK. The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,684
    edited April 2019

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    It's odd, the older you get, you start to enjoy the things you hated when you were young.

    Like taking naps, voting Tory, and getting spanked.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Someone’s rattled!
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    It's odd, the older you get, you start to enjoy the things you hated when you were young.

    Taking naps, voting Tory, getting spanked.
    Whatever happened to seanT.....
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,772
    Excellent header, although personally I am deeply worried that we have finally arrived at UK (or England's) national populism moment and he will run away with things.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    It's odd, the older you get, you start to enjoy the things you hated when you were young.

    Like taking naps, voting Tory, and getting spanked.
    That’s some messed up shit, apart from the naps.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I believe the pizzas are called Hawaiians.
    But their eaters are not Pacific.
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    You only need to be better than your opponents, and currently they‘re making him look like Sun Tzu by comparison.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    isam said:

    Someone’s rattled!

    ;)
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Yebbut no but yeah. As with Screaming Lord Sutch and the MRLP, for Farage standing in parliamentary elections is not about winning and the Brexit Party is not a party in the traditional sense of the term; like UKIP before it it is merely the Coconuts to Farage's Kid Creole. Lack of policies is not an issue.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    Getting caught, certainly. I mean it's not as if a former MP and former Cabinet Minister was photographed at table with a dominatrix and some white powder. That would obviously be unthinkable... :)
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    viewcode said:

    geoffw said:

    You dis Farage. Don't disparage Farage.

    With a barrage. In a carriage. In a garage. During a marriage.
    Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do!
    I’m half crazy, all for the love of you.
    It won’t be a stylish marriage
    Cos I can’t afford a carriage
    But you'll look sweet,
    Behind the seat
    Of a bicycle built for two
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133
    viewcode said:

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    Getting caught, certainly. I mean it's not as if a former MP and former Cabinet Minister was photographed at table with a dominatrix and some white powder. That would obviously be unthinkable... :)
    Being caught eating a fancy burger was a far bigger scandal....
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    I don't think any of the above really impacts on the success of the Brexit party. The key factor is whether we leave the EU or not.

    Let's say the Brexit party wins the EU elections and the Tory party panics and appoints a hard Brexiteer. I would then expect the Tory party ratings to recover and the Brexit party to fall back. If we finally leave (by what ever means) I would expect the Brexit party to fade away like UKIP did.

    Now, if, on the other hand, the Tory MPs appoint another remainer and we end up not leaving, either by another massive extension or plain revocation, then I would expect to see the Brexit party to do really well and we would see mass defections (certainly at local level from the Cons)

    In many ways I see the Brexit Party as a pressure group that will have an inverse relationship to the likelihood of Brexit happening.

    I can't really see much of a future for CUK. The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    Agreed, the success of the Brexit Party ironically depends on us staying in the EU for as long as possible and May also staying in office as long as possible, or being succeeded by a Remainer (albeit the latter is unlikely given the Tory membership polls).

    Labour is also not immune from the Brexit Party, the latest YouGov poll has 10% of 2017 Labour voters voting for the Brexit Party or UKIP in the European elections, almost as many as the 12% who will vote for CUK

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/y0zo9icxct/TheTimes_190411_VI_Trackers_bpc_w.pdf
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited April 2019
    The ‘But he’s lost 7 times in parliamentary elections’ argument really needs to be put back in its box. On 5 of those occasions he was effectively a paper candidate, once he lost to the speaker when UKIP got 3% nationwide, and the other time the Tories had to ship in canvassers from across the country and fight a court case to beat him.

    Smear smear smear and find guilty by association when the other parties are guilty of the same is so boring.

    As it stands, the re emergence of Farage is acting like a proxy for No deal, and makes the MV4 far more likely to pass. Then his detractors will say he failed again, as he retires having achieved his mission of the UK leaving the EU.
  • viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Are the LDs still that toxic from the coalition? Personally, I think their problems are that they have given yup trying to appeal to the 52% of the country who voted for Brexit, and that their last 2 leaders have been poor.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,628

    I agree with Alastair, love the Farage against the machine headline.

    Like rage against the machine, a lot more establishment than they like to let on.
    But likely to end up a surprise #1 again, when people get fed up of being ignored and told what to think by a self-appointed elite?
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    edited April 2019
    I don't think any of the stuff in the header matters. All Farage needs to do for the Euros is get on the telly. The message writes itself, and it's too late to build an organisation on the ground.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Are the LDs still that toxic from the coalition? Personally, I think their problems are that they have given yup trying to appeal to the 52% of the country who voted for Brexit, and that their last 2 leaders have been poor.
    Bit of both maybe. People still bring up tuition fees and the like, and they seem keen to repudiate their time in power and alienate anyone who did still vote for them back then like me. But also they do seem to have nothing of interest except Brexit. Didn't Lamb lament that fact recently?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    I agree with Alastair, love the Farage against the machine headline.

    Thank Nige


  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Charles said:

    viewcode said:

    geoffw said:

    You dis Farage. Don't disparage Farage.

    With a barrage. In a carriage. In a garage. During a marriage.
    Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do!
    I’m half crazy, all for the love of you.
    It won’t be a stylish marriage
    Cos I can’t afford a carriage
    But you'll look sweet,
    Behind the seat
    Of a bicycle built for two
    I once idly considered a place at the University of Illinois at Urbana because of the HAL connection. But when I totted up how much it would cost, there was no way it was cost-effective.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381
    viewcode said:

    If I may politely disagree with the header. It gives a long list why BP will not succeed in the long term and maybe that is correct. But in the short term it is in demonstrably rude health. You can't get poll figures like that from zero in a short time without having some ability to attract voters.

    Farage has the same ability to enthuse a substantial minority that Alex Salmond and Ken Livingstone had, even if lots of people dislike such politicians. I'd definitely place a ceiling of 25-30% on his level of support, but that could take a politician a long way, right now.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,131
    Sean_F said:

    viewcode said:

    If I may politely disagree with the header. It gives a long list why BP will not succeed in the long term and maybe that is correct. But in the short term it is in demonstrably rude health. You can't get poll figures like that from zero in a short time without having some ability to attract voters.

    Farage has the same ability to enthuse a substantial minority that Alex Salmond and Ken Livingstone had, even if lots of people dislike such politicians. I'd definitely place a ceiling of 25-30% on his level of support, but that could take a politician a long way, right now.
    Indeed
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Danny565 said:

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
    Outrageous

    “Let me get this clear, as I said on the radio and as I repeat now, I personally have no problem with mothers breastfeeding wherever they want”
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Kind of agree with isam about the failed parliamentary candidate jibe. It's true and a little funny but mostly irrelevant considering his impact elsewhere and the national position when he stood.

    Though I dont think it makes MV4 any more likely to pass. The opposite in fact. Tory hard leavers are acting more bullish, even the ones who voted for the deal last time, emboldened that no deal might be viable again, they hope. The 30 plus needed to see the MV pass are no more likely to come as the mps will still believe they have numbers to delay things as needed
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    Whip for deal+referendum. It'll hurt but it's better than bleeding to death.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    At least the pineapples were on them.

    ....it's past the watershed ain't it?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I believe the pizzas are called Hawaiians.
    Tell me more. :o
  • kle4 said:

    Kind of agree with isam about the failed parliamentary candidate jibe. It's true and a little funny but mostly irrelevant considering his impact elsewhere and the national position when he stood.

    Though I dont think it makes MV4 any more likely to pass. The opposite in fact. Tory hard leavers are acting more bullish, even the ones who voted for the deal last time, emboldened that no deal might be viable again, they hope. The 30 plus needed to see the MV pass are no more likely to come as the mps will still believe they have numbers to delay things as needed

    I reckon his chickening out of the Eastleigh by election in 2013 was his biggest mistake, I think if he stood he would have won.

    Plus he has history in that constituency, he wouldn't have been seen as a carpetbagger.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
  • RobD said:

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    At least the pineapples were on them.

    ....it's past the watershed ain't it?
    All this makes me think about is Stephen Milligan and the orange in his mouth.

    It was four years later when I went to university that I finally had the courage to ask someone why Stephen Milligan died with an orange in his mouth.

    Yes, there was a time when I was really innocent.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381
    As things stand, the Brexit Party has big potential future problems. A one man band can't be viable in the long run, and Farage is a control freak who can't tolerate rivals. I don't think it has much in the way of current problems. Few potential voters will be put off by the mattes mentioned in the last third of the header.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    30+ of them? Really?

    We've heard the 'focus minds' argument before and yet even with a very real chance of no Brexit or even no deal only 6 labour mps wavered. It isn't happening. And that without fools like Drax regretting their choice last time. If the Brexit party top the poll might not others who reluctantly backed the deal not do so again? I believe you yourself have suggested the EU might not extend again after all.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    At least the pineapples were on them.

    ....it's past the watershed ain't it?
    All this makes me think about is Stephen Milligan and the orange in his mouth.

    It was four years later when I went to university that I finally had the courage to ask someone why Stephen Milligan died with an orange in his mouth.

    Yes, there was a time when I was really innocent.
    It is odd, though, that someone so ferociously intelligent didn't understand why it needs to be a lemon, not an orange.
  • kle4 said:

    viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Are the LDs still that toxic from the coalition? Personally, I think their problems are that they have given yup trying to appeal to the 52% of the country who voted for Brexit, and that their last 2 leaders have been poor.
    Bit of both maybe. People still bring up tuition fees and the like, and they seem keen to repudiate their time in power and alienate anyone who did still vote for them back then like me. But also they do seem to have nothing of interest except Brexit. Didn't Lamb lament that fact recently?
    I saw a LD PPB broadcast the other day and even that was going on about Brexit! They have almost made themselves the anti-Brexit party.

    If they are going to make progress again, they need to change leader and try and put out some olive branches to Brexit voters. And come up with some other policies.

    It's a shame Lamb isn't leader.

    The advantages the LDs do have over CHUK are:

    - 12 seats, of which maybe 8 are reasonably safe
    - Large numbers of councillors and activists
    - Large numbers of members
    - A place in the election debates
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    Whip for deal+referendum. It'll hurt but it's better than bleeding to death.
    It looked that way 4 months ago. They've been paralysed ever since or seeking unicorns. Clearly they are willing to do anything for Brexit, but they wont do that, as meatloaf sang years ago
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    ydoethur said:

    First

    Do you want pineapple with that?
    I spent the afternoon with four people, three of whom ate pizzas with pineapples on them.

    I'm in my safe space at the moment.
    They were eating pizzas while covered in pineapples? To each their own...
    I thought the days of tories being caught engaged in kinky s&m was a thing of the past.
    At least the pineapples were on them.

    ....it's past the watershed ain't it?
    All this makes me think about is Stephen Milligan and the orange in his mouth

    It was four years later when I went to university that I finally had the courage to ask someone why Stephen Milligan died with an orange in his mouth.

    Yes, there was a time when I was really innocent.
    I was 27 when he died, and up to that point, I'd never heard of auto-erotic oxytoxiphilia.
    I also remember spewing coffee over the Spectator, I was laughing so much at Auberon Waugh's obituary for Milligan.

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Still interesting that several indies have no interest in joining anybody it seems. Policy differences for some no doubt, but also perhaps just not being up for a very difficult, likely fruitless attempt to break the 2 party system?
  • thecommissionerthecommissioner Posts: 165
    edited April 2019
    The EU is likely to have a different balance to it at the end of May, irrespective of how we vote.

    The centre right EPP is forecast to be the biggest party by Europe Elects with a total of 177 MEPs. The three eurosceptic reform, freedom of nations and direct democracy groups are forecast to have 166 between them.

    However, those figures allow for Orban's Hungarian dozen to sit within the EPP, whereas they appear to be ideologically aligned to one of the latter groups. That is substantial drift from the 2014 europhile right to a 2019 eurosceptic one.

    Those figures are also based on non participation by the UK.

    As the UK right does not sit in the EPP it's probable that an election would send 30-40 Tory/Brexit Party MEPs into the reform, freedom and democracy grouping. This would be at the combined expense of countries gaining from the Brexit seat redistribution (Spain and France gain most) and the German led EPP on the right.

    If the eurosceptics outnumber the europhile right, where does that leave the EPP on 27th May?


  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Given that they've already had to boot out one of their candidates after a cursory check of his Twitter history, just four hours after being announced, I suspect the cleansing powers of the TIGs will evaporate pretty soonish.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    kle4 said:


    It looked that way 4 months ago. They've been paralysed ever since or seeking unicorns. Clearly they are willing to do anything for Brexit, but they wont do that, as meatloaf sang years ago

    Their ankle is chained to a pipe, next to them is a saw
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,698

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    Whip for deal+referendum. It'll hurt but it's better than bleeding to death.
    It's so obviously the only way out for the government. How long will it take them to realise?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    5 minutes

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    Whip for deal+referendum. It'll hurt but it's better than bleeding to death.
    It's so obviously the only way out for the government. How long will it take them to realise?
    5 minutes after the government falls.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,722
    Farage and the Brexit Party channel the gig economy into politics. They're not there for the long haul. They just have one job to get done and it looks to me like they have a chance.

    In these terms Farage is already the most successful UK politician of our time.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    kle4 said:

    Still interesting that several indies have no interest in joining anybody it seems. Policy differences for some no doubt, but also perhaps just not being up for a very difficult, likely fruitless attempt to break the 2 party system?

    Austin, Hopkins & Field on the (ex) Labour side are Brexiters so TIG is not really an option for them. Woodcock would be a natural Tigger politically but he left Labour under something of a (non political) cloud and so they may not want him. Williamson I guess hopes to be readmitted to Labour in due course.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    By the same token would it not focus the minds of some Tory MPs into opposing the Deal once again, rather than be blamed for allowing the treasonous compromise to come to pass?
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    edited April 2019

    kle4 said:

    viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Are the LDs still that toxic from the coalition? Personally, I think their problems are that they have given yup trying to appeal to the 52% of the country who voted for Brexit, and that their last 2 leaders have been poor.
    Bit of both maybe. People still bring up tuition fees and the like, and they seem keen to repudiate their time in power and alienate anyone who did still vote for them back then like me. But also they do seem to have nothing of interest except Brexit. Didn't Lamb lament that fact recently?
    I saw a LD PPB broadcast the other day and even that was going on about Brexit! They have almost made themselves the anti-Brexit party.

    If they are going to make progress again, they need to change leader and try and put out some olive branches to Brexit voters. And come up with some other policies.

    It's a shame Lamb isn't leader.

    The advantages the LDs do have over CHUK are:

    - 12 seats, of which maybe 8 are reasonably safe
    - Large numbers of councillors and activists
    - Large numbers of members
    - A place in the election debates
    This is why I think it'll be the Greens who surprise on the upside in the European elections, rather than the Lib Dems.

    As much as some people (including the author of this thread header) think some people are fixated on Brexit, and only identify as "Remainers" or "Leavers" to the exclusion of everything else, I'm really not convinced that's right. Whereas the Lib Dems are seen as only being interested in Brexit (as increasingly are Labour, since for months now they've only been getting media attention when they've been doing something to delay Brexit or to vote against a specific Brexit option), I feel like the perception is that the Greens have a broader agenda, which will appeal even to a lot of Remain voters who want to register that they're bored of the subject and want politicians to focus on other things.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    They're counted by local government area.

  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708

    The EU is likely to have a different balance to it at the end of May, irrespective of how we vote.

    The centre right EPP is forecast to be the biggest party by Europe Elects with a total of 177 MEPs. The three eurosceptic reform, freedom of nations and direct democracy groups are forecast to have 166 between them.

    However, those figures allow for Orban's Hungarian dozen to sit within the EPP, whereas they appear to be ideologically aligned to one of the latter groups. That is substantial drift from the 2014 europhile right to a 2019 eurosceptic one.

    Those figures are also based on non participation by the UK.

    As the UK right does not sit in the EPP it's probable that an election would send 30-40 Tory/Brexit Party MEPs into the reform, freedom and democracy grouping. This would be at the combined expense of countries gaining from the Brexit seat redistribution (Spain and France gain most) and the German led EPP on the right.

    If the eurosceptics outnumber the europhile right, where does that leave the EPP on 27th May?


    Not much difference, the europhile right already need the europhile left to pass stuff. If the nationalists had a majority that would be a big deal, but we're nowhere near that on those numbers.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    30+ of them? Really?

    We've heard the 'focus minds' argument before and yet even with a very real chance of no Brexit or even no deal only 6 labour mps wavered. It isn't happening. And that without fools like Drax regretting their choice last time. If the Brexit party top the poll might not others who reluctantly backed the deal not do so again? I believe you yourself have suggested the EU might not extend again after all.
    That was pre Brexit Party. If the Brexit Party top the poll in their seats they will start to worry about losing them if we continue to stay in the EU.

    The EU will extend for ever, the only risk is Macron eventually vetos. If we are still in the EU by the time of the next general election and the Tories have not replaced May by a hard Brexiteer there is a clear chance of an SNP 2015 style wave for the Brexit Party and Farage ends up PM


  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381

    The EU is likely to have a different balance to it at the end of May, irrespective of how we vote.

    The centre right EPP is forecast to be the biggest party by Europe Elects with a total of 177 MEPs. The three eurosceptic reform, freedom of nations and direct democracy groups are forecast to have 166 between them.

    However, those figures allow for Orban's Hungarian dozen to sit within the EPP, whereas they appear to be ideologically aligned to one of the latter groups. That is substantial drift from the 2014 europhile right to a 2019 eurosceptic one.

    Those figures are also based on non participation by the UK.

    As the UK right does not sit in the EPP it's probable that an election would send 30-40 Tory/Brexit Party MEPs into the reform, freedom and democracy grouping. This would be at the combined expense of countries gaining from the Brexit seat redistribution (Spain and France gain most) and the German led EPP on the right.

    If the eurosceptics outnumber the europhile right, where does that leave the EPP on 27th May

    The EPP are pretty well indistinguishable from most of the Social Democrats and ALDE, although each group attracts some strange hangers-on.

    Not much difference, the europhile right already need the europhile left to pass stuff. If the nationalists had a majority that would be a big deal, but we're nowhere near that on those numbers.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited April 2019
    BBC Newsnight:

    Anti-Brexit forces could have won about 16 seats at the Euro elections if they'd formed an alliance. Instead they're likely to win just 7 seats, all of which would likely be LD.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    No, the results are counted by council area which largely overlaps with constutuencies then reported in the central Regional counting centre to get the total Regional tally and allocation of seats
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,720
    TGOHF said:
    A National Convention? Are we going to get a Chicago 1968-style fight for the soul of the Tory party?
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    Each individual council releases its own results, though.
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352

    TGOHF said:
    A National Convention? Are we going to get a Chicago 1968-style fight for the soul of the Tory party?
    I thought Tories had no souls?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Danny565 said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    Each individual council releases its own results, though.
    That's true. The exception was the 1999 Euros (the first to be conducted using this system) when they were declared by Westminster constituency for some reason.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    I

    TGOHF said:
    A National Convention? Are we going to get a Chicago 1968-style fight for the soul of the Tory party?
    I thought Tories had no souls?

    TGOHF said:
    A National Convention? Are we going to get a Chicago 1968-style fight for the soul of the Tory party?
    I thought Tories had no souls?
    Not individually, as they are all given up to the collective dark soul of the baby eating machinery of the party I believe.

  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    Sean_F said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    They're counted by local government area.

    I stand corrected, though individual constituency results will still not be known.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    By the same token would it not focus the minds of some Tory MPs into opposing the Deal once again, rather than be blamed for allowing the treasonous compromise to come to pass?
    Not if the alternative is staying in the EU, as it is clear it is in the current Parliament.

    The Brexit Party is only polling so well because we have not left the EU yet, had the Brexit Deal passed they would only be getting the fanatics support not the more moderate Leavers who will back them at the EU Parliament elections.

    Also the closest to a Commons majority in the indicative votes was Deal plus CU, which fell just 3 votes short, if a few more Labour MPs switch to that rather than EUref2 because of the Brexit Party success it will pass
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 4,780
    kle4 said:

    viewcode said:

    The suggestion earlier that the LDs should merge into them was ridiculous.

    It has the advantages of detoxifying the Libs.
    Are the LDs still that toxic from the coalition? Personally, I think their problems are that they have given yup trying to appeal to the 52% of the country who voted for Brexit, and that their last 2 leaders have been poor.
    Bit of both maybe. People still bring up tuition fees and the like, and they seem keen to repudiate their time in power and alienate anyone who did still vote for them back then like me. But also they do seem to have nothing of interest except Brexit. Didn't Lamb lament that fact recently?
    Agreed. Certainly the LDs have made very clear that they are appealing only to the votes of the 48% who voted for Remain. But on top of that, the majority of that 48% are people on the left who remember the fact that they facilitated 5 years of extreme austerity under Cameron and Osborne as well as the high tuition fees that a lot are now repaying. That toxicity may be wearing off a bit but it will take a decade to get it out of the system.

    At best I think that around 20% of the electorate* both like the EU and were reasonably content with the direction of the 2010-15 Government. The LDs are in a good position to compete for their vote. For the other 80%, they are in a very poor position to compete. Just to make matters worse, Change UK are also fishing in the same pool.

    Compare and contrast with the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, when the LDs very cleverly did not defined themselves and so could simultaneously appeal to left and right, whilst being the only 3rd party show in town.

    *20% of the electorate, but 60%+ of PBers and 80%+ of PB thread authors.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    isam said:

    Danny565 said:

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
    Outrageous

    “Let me get this clear, as I said on the radio and as I repeat now, I personally have no problem with mothers breastfeeding wherever they want”
    Yes, Farage is two-faced in that he will tell one audience what it wants to hear and when other people complain about the misogyny, or the racism, he will then walk it back, claim to have had his words misconstrued and act the martyr when other people have the temerity to disagree with him.

    Quite how he's managed to get away with the act repeatedly over the years is beyond me.
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    edited April 2019
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    30+ of them? Really?

    We've heard the 'focus minds' argument before and yet even with a very real chance of no Brexit or even no deal only 6 labour mps wavered. It isn't happening. And that without fools like Drax regretting their choice last time. If the Brexit party top the poll might not others who reluctantly backed the deal not do so again? I believe you yourself have suggested the EU might not extend again after all.
    That was pre Brexit Party. If the Brexit Party top the poll in their seats they will start to worry about losing them if we continue to stay in the EU.

    The EU will extend for ever, the only risk is Macron eventually vetos. If we are still in the EU by the time of the next general election and the Tories have not replaced May by a hard Brexiteer there is a clear chance of an SNP 2015 style wave for the Brexit Party and Farage ends up PM


    Ha. No and no. Firstly, "topping the poll" next month will mean approx 25-30% of the votes. In a Westminster election this might gain them half a dozen seats, but that won't worry any of the main parties too much. Especially not Labour.

    Secondly, as we saw at the last general election, it's very hard to make politics just about Brexit (thank God). Of course this is the number 1 issue for the Gammon of the UK, but there really aren't enough of them out there to propel Farage to number 10.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    AndyJS said:

    BBC Newsnight:

    Anti-Brexit forces could have won about 16 seats at the Euro elections if they'd formed an alliance. Instead they're likely to win just 7 seats, all of which would likely be LD.

    Couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,005

    TGOHF said:
    A National Convention? Are we going to get a Chicago 1968-style fight for the soul of the Tory party?
    What the hell are we fighting for?
    Ah, just surrender and it won't hurt at all
    You just got time to say your prayers
    Yeah, while you're waiting for the hammer to, hammer to fall
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381

    Sean_F said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    They're counted by local government area.

    I stand corrected, though individual constituency results will still not be known.
    One should be able to work them out, though
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019

    Sean_F said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    They're counted by local government area.

    I stand corrected, though individual constituency results will still not be known.
    They can easily be calculated as ward results will be known via polling station and from that you can work out the wards in each constituency and thus the constituency result
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414

    isam said:

    Danny565 said:

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
    Outrageous

    “Let me get this clear, as I said on the radio and as I repeat now, I personally have no problem with mothers breastfeeding wherever they want”
    Yes, Farage is two-faced in that he will tell one audience what it wants to hear and when other people complain about the misogyny, or the racism, he will then walk it back, claim to have had his words misconstrued and act the martyr when other people have the temerity to disagree with him.

    Quite how he's managed to get away with the act repeatedly over the years is beyond me.
    See also Trump D.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,722
    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    But the votes are counted in regions not Westminster constituencies so individual constituency results will not be known.
    They're counted by local government area.

    I stand corrected, though individual constituency results will still not be known.
    One should be able to work them out, though
    Only by interpolation.
    :smile:
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,381
    dixiedean said:

    isam said:

    Danny565 said:

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
    Outrageous

    “Let me get this clear, as I said on the radio and as I repeat now, I personally have no problem with mothers breastfeeding wherever they want”
    Yes, Farage is two-faced in that he will tell one audience what it wants to hear and when other people complain about the misogyny, or the racism, he will then walk it back, claim to have had his words misconstrued and act the martyr when other people have the temerity to disagree with him.

    Quite how he's managed to get away with the act repeatedly over the years is beyond me.
    See also Trump D.
    The trick is not minding, as Gordon Liddy put it.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited April 2019
    Dadge said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    Theres nothing they can do. Baker et al and the DUP mean the WA wont pass. The EU would surely have bent on the backstop by now if they were going to. The members would love no deal but it costs the government its slender majority. Labour can provide the votes but they think power could be theirs, or remain, so have no incentive. Accepting a CU or referendum also splits them .

    The ministerial frustration is understandable but a fix is not within them. Not without a formal split.
    The prospect of the Brexit Party topping the poll in their constituencies could focus a few wavering Labour MPs minds in favour of the WA which is all it would need to scrape home
    30+ of them? Really?

    We've heard the 'focus minds' argument before and yet even with a very real chance of no Brexit or even no deal only 6 labour mps wavered. It isn't happening. And that without fools like Drax regretting their choice last time. If the Brexit party top the poll might not others who reluctantly backed the deal not do so again? I believe you yourself have suggested the EU might not extend again after all.
    That was pre Brexit Party. If the Brexit Party top the poll in their seats they will start to worry about losing them if we continue to stay in the EU.

    The EU will extend for ever, the only risk is Macron eventually vetos. If we are still in the EU by the time of the next general election and the Tories have not replaced May by a hard Brexiteer there is a clear chance of an SNP 2015 style wave for the Brexit Party and Farage ends up PM


    Ha. No and no. Firstly, "topping the poll" next month will mean approx 25-30% of the votes. In a Westminster election this might gain them half a dozen seats, but that won't worry any of the main parties too much. Especially not Labour.

    Secondly, as we saw at the last general election, it's very hard to make politics just about Brexit (thank God). Of course this is the number 1 issue for the Gammon of the UK, but there really aren't enough of them out there to propel Farage to number 10.
    It will certainly worry Labour MPs in strongly Leave seats if the Brexit Party tops the poll in their constituency, if we are still in the EU by the next general election the Brexit Party will only get stronger.

    The last general election is an absurd comparison, both parties promised we would have left the EU by this March, both have thus broken that promise as it is now late April and we are still in the EU.


    52% of the voters voted Leave, that is far more than a few Gammons
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,722
    Sean_F said:

    dixiedean said:

    isam said:

    Danny565 said:

    I'd forgotten about his HIV bullshit. So much bile to keep tabs on.

    His comments about how women who breastfeed should "perhaps sit in the corner" were the worst

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/05/nigel-farage-ukip-claridges-breastfeeding-mothers
    Outrageous

    “Let me get this clear, as I said on the radio and as I repeat now, I personally have no problem with mothers breastfeeding wherever they want”
    Yes, Farage is two-faced in that he will tell one audience what it wants to hear and when other people complain about the misogyny, or the racism, he will then walk it back, claim to have had his words misconstrued and act the martyr when other people have the temerity to disagree with him.

    Quite how he's managed to get away with the act repeatedly over the years is beyond me.
    See also Trump D.
    The trick is not minding, as Gordon Liddy put it.
    Yeah, what a Creep.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Last night I watched a bit of stand up comedy from Sara Pascoe, who it turns out comes from my area and went to a local school...

    Anyway she did a routine about female power and how Theresa May has actually made it uncool for white women to be in charge... called her ‘anxiety personified’ which I thought was quite accurate
This discussion has been closed.