Not as much of course. But you just had a vote and decided to keep the status quo.
The paradoxical battle cry of Brexityoonery: as an independent country in the EU you'd be told what to do and like it, stay in the UK to be told even more what to do & we won't give a fuck whether you like it.
We (the Scots) had an even more recent vote on retaining EU membership, something that previously we were assured would be secured by voting No.
Scotland is just under 10% of the UK population with its own Parliament and about 10% of the Westminster Parliament MPs are Scottish, Scotland would be just 1% of the EU population with just 1% of European Parliament seats etc and would be easily overruled on Council of Ministers population determined qualified majority voting.
Scotland voted 63% for Unionist parties at GE17 after the Brexit vote
Yeah, bloody EU outvoting us on going to war, welfare policy, foreign policy, fiscal policy, defence, broadcasting, trade and industry, renewables, nuclear energy, oil, coal, gas and electricity, the constitution and immigration.
What's that you say, we'd be allowed to make almost all our own decisions on those? Well I never.
Most UK law comes from the EU now, it would be the same for an independent Scotland
Because Root has no imagination and sticks rigidly to what he knows?
We have Sam Curran who is full of confidence and a different angle and of course Rashid who I am not sure why we are picking if we aren't ever going to bowl him.
This is true, but at that point he's got 5 years to play with, and they'd also lynch him for doing Hard Brexit and exploding the economy, so there's no winning with those guys anyhow.
And if he got lucky the opposition would split itself between UKIP and Con, or even better 3 different UKIPs and Con.
Far from it, in opposition without the responsibilities of power the Tories would be free to go full on pro hard Brexit with Boris or Mogg as Leader of the Opposition and unify the UKIP vote behind the Conservatives.
Meanwhile PM 'cave in' Corbyn as he would soon be known by Boris would be quickly on the ropes trying to push through his unaffordable promises while being pushed around by the EU in BINO
This is after the Tories have tried to do Brexit, sold these people out and voted their own government down, so it's probably not safe to assume a wonderfully popular united opposition. Also the Jacob Rees-Mogg Working Class Hero strategy may not work out as well as you're hoping. But we're several hypotheticals deep at this point, so who knows.
The Tory PM will have tried to push through a Chequers Deal but there is no doubt most Tory voters are strong Leavers and would rally behind a Mogg or Boris leadership, as would a good deal of working class voters who are also strong Leavers. Boris as he showed in the London Mayoral elections and the referendum has strong appeal to skilled working class C2 voters in particular
Magnificant speech by Gordon Brown urging he Labour Party to adopt the full definition of anti-semitism and to do it immediately and without question.
Being shown live on Sky News.
Hell will freeze over before they will do that.
Ironically, Labour adopted the IHRA definition, or most of it anyway, before the Conservative Party.
"most of it" can cover a multitude of sins.
It's amazing how easily Labour and Corbyn could have stopped this story months ago by doing the right thing. Yet they have sunk deeper into the cess by avoiding doing the right thing.
Indeed but it is worth pointing out from time to time that the blue team did nothing at all until prompted by Labour's flounderings.
Frankly, there was little need to as they weren't led by an anti-Semitic leader with loads of anti-Semitic followers. But I'm glad they've done so.
Why haven't Labour?
This is where we came in. Labour adopted it. The Conservatives did not. Later, it transpired Labour had modified a couple of the examples that come with it. This proved, to say the least, controversial. But only after the rows started did the Conservatives adopt it at all.
Because Root has no imagination and sticks rigidly to what he knows?
We have Sam Curran who is full of confidence and a different angle and of course Rashid who I am not sure why we are picking if we aren't ever going to bowl him.
You try your seamers first - and looking at the wicket taking ball which kept low, that’s hardly wrong. Stokes troubled Rahane, but I suspect he won’t be kept on long. Some overs from Curran to give Rashid footmarks to bowl into would be sensible.
Magnificant speech by Gordon Brown urging he Labour Party to adopt the full definition of anti-semitism and to do it immediately and without question.
Being shown live on Sky News.
Hell will freeze over before they will do that.
Ironically, Labour adopted the IHRA definition, or most of it anyway, before the Conservative Party.
"most of it" can cover a multitude of sins.
It's amazing how easily Labour and Corbyn could have stopped this story months ago by doing the right thing. Yet they have sunk deeper into the cess by avoiding doing the right thing.
If he’d adopted the definition going forward, and said that maybe some of us in the past were careless with our language when judged by modern standards, the issue would have mostly have been put to bed.
What we now have instead, is a bunch of hardcore Corbyn supporters, some of them party members, who have clearly shown themselves to be racist - and Corbyn completely impotent to do anything about it.
Magnificant speech by Gordon Brown urging he Labour Party to adopt the full definition of anti-semitism and to do it immediately and without question.
Being shown live on Sky News.
Hell will freeze over before they will do that.
Ironically, Labour adopted the IHRA definition, or most of it anyway, before the Conservative Party.
"most of it" can cover a multitude of sins.
It's amazing how easily Labour and Corbyn could have stopped this story months ago by doing the right thing. Yet they have sunk deeper into the cess by avoiding doing the right thing.
Indeed but it is worth pointing out from time to time that the blue team did nothing at all until prompted by Labour's flounderings.
Frankly, there was little need to as they weren't led by an anti-Semitic leader with loads of anti-Semitic followers. But I'm glad they've done so.
Why haven't Labour?
This is where we came in. Labour adopted it. The Conservatives did not. Later, it transpired Labour had modified a couple of the examples that come with it. This proved, to say the least, controversial. But only after the rows started did the Conservatives adopt it at all.
Although that may have been an oversight given the slightly strange circumstances. What appears to have happened is that May ordered its adoption, but because of the context in which she gave the order it was adopted by the government not the governing party.
It would if that is indeed what happened have been a silly oversight, especially given the length of time it took them to notice it, but it's not impossible that May was telling what she believed to be the truth.
Because Root has no imagination and sticks rigidly to what he knows?
We have Sam Curran who is full of confidence and a different angle and of course Rashid who I am not sure why we are picking if we aren't ever going to bowl him.
You try your seamers first - and looking at the wicket taking ball which kept low, that’s hardly wrong. Stokes troubled Rahane, but I suspect he won’t be kept on long. Some overs from Curran to give Rashid footmarks to bowl into would be sensible.
That's a very "traditional" view ;-) . India were happy to go with a spinner with the new ball.
I would have bowled Curran before a half fit Stokes, who is 5-10 mph down on his usual speed.
Wow that looked like a terrible decision from the 3rd umpire. His bat hit the pad.
Only goes to show that DRS is not infallible.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
The chance of no specific deal at all being able to pass the Commons gets higher every day.
The question is will Labour take it to the point of actually leaving with no deal, given that very few of them want that outcome and they could end up with a fair amount of the blame?
If May has a deal with the EU, but Labour works with Mogg to bring it down (for its own naked ambition to bring the Govt. down then win an election) - then Labour will own No Deal Brexit.....
No, Brexit will be owned by the Tories whatever the outcome; that die is already cast.
The British people voted for Brexit against the advice of the Tory PM at the time, May is trying to get a reasonable Deal that respects the Brexit vote, if Corbyn forces No Deal and in a general election where voters decide whether they want Boris or Corbyn to lead No Deal Brexit Britain Boris may then win
In that scenario I agree with you. Indeed it would be who do you want to run the Country, not just Brexit
Though I do not see it happening
It would only happen if Corbyn and the ERG voted down a Deal and May was forced to resign as PM and replaced by Boris as Tory leader and a general election shortly followed
I am sure we can both agree that is very unlikely
That depends on Corbyn
I respectfully suggest it depends on a lot more than Corbyn
With Labour votes and Tory loyalist and DUP votes May can get a Deal with the EU through Parliament even if the ERG vote against, if Labour votes against a Deal though then combined with ERG votes against May will find it difficult to get a Deal through the Commons
You are assuming labour will vote as a block and that is not a given
Either way, it remains the case that the government (with its DUP allies) have a majority, and if they vote together can deliver whatever they want. People wont be surprised to see the opposition parties voting against the government. If the government is defeated, the blame (or thanks, depending on the circumstances) will fall upon the rebels, and the Tories will in any event carry the can for whatever Brexit eventually inflicts, good or bad, upon us all.
Wow that looked like a terrible decision from the 3rd umpire. His bat hit the pad.
Only goes to show that DRS is not infallible.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
I forget, is hotspot not part of DRS? Because they didn't even look at that to add evidence one way or another.
This is true, but at that point he's got 5 years to play with, and they'd also lynch him for doing Hard Brexit and exploding the economy, so there's no winning with those guys anyhow.
And if he got lucky the opposition would split itself between UKIP and Con, or even better 3 different UKIPs and Con.
Far from it, in opposition without the responsibilities of power the Tories would be free to go full on pro hard Brexit with Boris or Mogg as Leader of the Opposition and unify the UKIP vote behind the Conservatives.
Meanwhile PM 'cave in' Corbyn as he would soon be known by Boris would be quickly on the ropes trying to push through his unaffordable promises while being pushed around by the EU in BINO
This is after the Tories have tried to do Brexit, sold these people out and voted their own government down, so it's probably not safe to assume a wonderfully popular united opposition. Also the Jacob Rees-Mogg Working Class Hero strategy may not work out as well as you're hoping. But we're several hypotheticals deep at this point, so who knows.
The Tory PM will have tried to push through a Chequers Deal but there is no doubt most Tory voters are strong Leavers and would rally behind a Mogg or Boris leadership, as would a good deal of working class voters who are also strong Leavers. Boris as he showed in the London Mayoral elections and the referendum has strong appeal to skilled working class C2 voters in particular
Which contradicts precisely nothing I said at all.
Blair was a totally different proposition to Corbyn and Boris is a more electorally appealing proposition than Hague. See the London 2012 Mayoral election where Boris led Livingstone 53% to 47% with C2DEs even in Labour London
Magnificant speech by Gordon Brown urging he Labour Party to adopt the full definition of anti-semitism and to do it immediately and without question.
Being shown live on Sky News.
Hell will freeze over before they will do that.
Ironically, Labour adopted the IHRA definition, or most of it anyway, before the Conservative Party.
"most of it" can cover a multitude of sins.
It's amazing how easily Labour and Corbyn could have stopped this story months ago by doing the right thing. Yet they have sunk deeper into the cess by avoiding doing the right thing.
Indeed but it is worth pointing out from time to time that the blue team did nothing at all until prompted by Labour's flounderings.
Frankly, there was little need to as they weren't led by an anti-Semitic leader with loads of anti-Semitic followers. But I'm glad they've done so.
Why haven't Labour?
This is where we came in. Labour adopted it. The Conservatives did not. Later, it transpired Labour had modified a couple of the examples that come with it. This proved, to say the least, controversial. But only after the rows started did the Conservatives adopt it at all.
Labour has an anti-Semitic leader, and lots of its Jewish MPs and others are receiving anti-Semitic abuse. Instead of pointing and saying: "Look, squirrel!", perhaps you ought to wonder why you team has not got its house in order.
Wow that looked like a terrible decision from the 3rd umpire. His bat hit the pad.
Only goes to show that DRS is not infallible.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
I forget, is hotspot not part of DRS? Because they didn't even look at that to add evidence one way or another.
They use Snicko now. Nobody trusted hotspot very far and as Snicko is now available much more quickly (it used to take some minutes to be ready) that's the preferred technology.
MI5 chief summons Jeremy Corbyn for a 'facts of life' briefing on Britain's terror threat amid criticism of Labour leader's approach to national security
Magnificant speech by Gordon Brown urging he Labour Party to adopt the full definition of anti-semitism and to do it immediately and without question.
Being shown live on Sky News.
Hell will freeze over before they will do that.
Ironically, Labour adopted the IHRA definition, or most of it anyway, before the Conservative Party.
"most of it" can cover a multitude of sins.
It's amazing how easily Labour and Corbyn could have stopped this story months ago by doing the right thing. Yet they have sunk deeper into the cess by avoiding doing the right thing.
Indeed but it is worth pointing out from time to time that the blue team did nothing at all until prompted by Labour's flounderings.
Frankly, there was little need to as they weren't led by an anti-Semitic leader with loads of anti-Semitic followers. But I'm glad they've done so.
Why haven't Labour?
This is where we came in. Labour adopted it. The Conservatives did not. Later, it transpired Labour had modified a couple of the examples that come with it. This proved, to say the least, controversial. But only after the rows started did the Conservatives adopt it at all.
Labour has an anti-Semitic leader, and lots of its Jewish MPs and others are receiving anti-Semitic abuse. Instead of pointing and saying: "Look, squirrel!", perhaps you ought to wonder why you team has not got its house in order.
Not my team. I am not and nor have I ever been a member of the Labour Party. I am merely a humble seeker after truth, in order to bet on it.
Wow that looked like a terrible decision from the 3rd umpire. His bat hit the pad.
Only goes to show that DRS is not infallible.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
I forget, is hotspot not part of DRS? Because they didn't even look at that to add evidence one way or another.
They got rid of hotspot because
1) It was very expensive
2) It was easy to game, it was said put the right lotion on your bat it would negate hotspot.
Wow that looked like a terrible decision from the 3rd umpire. His bat hit the pad.
Only goes to show that DRS is not infallible.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
I forget, is hotspot not part of DRS? Because they didn't even look at that to add evidence one way or another.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit.
I am just slightly wary of this one - I am not sure why this internal document would have a No10 header. I know that opposition parties are entitled to access to key civil servants - but this sort of plan would have been Labour generated.
I may be wrong - but it doesn't quite ring true. I can well imagine such a team plan existing - just not presented in this way.
Particularly with it saying 'Downing street' rather than 'Downing Street' on the top right of the first image
Didn't see it but I'm assuming Marr didn't have the testicular fortitude to ask Sacks about the context that made 'The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong, for good or for ill, survive' acceptable?
Didn't see it but I'm assuming Marr didn't have the testicular fortitude to ask Sacks about the context that made 'The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong, for good or for ill, survive' acceptable?
Context? Iran's Ahmedinejad a few years back wanted to "erase Israel from the pages of history". That context?
Sky Sports "Super Sunday" should be done under the trade descriptions....There is nothing "super" about Cardiff vs Arsenal and Watford vs Tottenham.
Watford vs Spurs could be an interesting clash of two undefeated teams, as indeed could Burnley vs Man U. Can Burnley rebuild their season after their short European run.
Cardiff vs Arsenal less so, but I note the Cardif goalkeeper does well on FF, top goalkeeper for points. Can he keep a clean sheet? They do seem tough to score against.
Sky Sports "Super Sunday" should be done under the trade descriptions....There is nothing "super" about Cardiff vs Arsenal and Watford vs Tottenham.
Watford vs Spurs could be an interesting clash of two undefeated teams, as indeed could Burnley vs Man U. Can Burnley rebuild their season after their short European run.
Cardiff vs Arsenal less so, but I note the Cardif goalkeeper does well on FF, top goalkeeper for points. Can he keep a clean sheet? They do seem tough to score against.
MI5 chief summons Jeremy Corbyn for a 'facts of life' briefing on Britain's terror threat amid criticism of Labour leader's approach to national security
Sky Sports "Super Sunday" should be done under the trade descriptions....There is nothing "super" about Cardiff vs Arsenal and Watford vs Tottenham.
Watford vs Spurs could be an interesting clash of two undefeated teams, as indeed could Burnley vs Man U. Can Burnley rebuild their season after their short European run.
Cardiff vs Arsenal less so, but I note the Cardif goalkeeper does well on FF, top goalkeeper for points. Can he keep a clean sheet? They do seem tough to score against.
I shall be watching the F1 and cricket.
I hope to do some sorting in the garden, harvesting my plums and blackberries, but odds on either team to not score in Cardiff look value.
Didn't see it but I'm assuming Marr didn't have the testicular fortitude to ask Sacks about the context that made 'The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong, for good or for ill, survive' acceptable?
Context? Iran's Ahmedinejad a few years back wanted to "erase Israel from the pages of history". That context?
Ah, the chronically stunted, childish context that the current leader of Israel should be excused making fascistic, minatory statements now because the ex president of Iran made fascistic, minatory statements over a decade ago. Persuasive.
MI5 chief summons Jeremy Corbyn for a 'facts of life' briefing on Britain's terror threat amid criticism of Labour leader's approach to national security
Was to have happened Tuesday, when the new Westminster term starts. Corbyn postpones. Maybe he has his own intelligence briefing - that a number of Labour MPs are going to leave the Party that day?
MI5 chief summons Jeremy Corbyn for a 'facts of life' briefing on Britain's terror threat amid criticism of Labour leader's approach to national security
Calling the Sunday Times fake news...brave....are you saying Jezza wasn't asked to meet with heard of MI5? Just because he had decided he doesn't want to attend doesn't make it fake news. Or is you whole Fake News is because a newspaper used the term summoned?
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have checked out. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have been legit. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
It is best not to feed them. It only encourages them.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have been legit. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
It is best not to feed them. It only encourages them.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have been legit. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
It is best not to feed them. It only encourages them.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have checked out. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
You still think Corbyn is a Czech spy and RED ROARS fake document is true.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have checked out. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
You still think Corbyn is a Czech spy and RED ROARS fake document is true.
You need help
I never said Corbyn was a Czech spy. I actually said the opposite, go check. I said spys have to be smart and unassuming, which Corbyn has never been, and he was a total nobody at the time.
I said he was sympathetic to the cause of the Eastern block and would have had to been even moronic than I think he is not to realise who he was meeting.
Where as you spent weeks limbo dancing about how the Russian's didn't do Salisbury.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have checked out. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
You still think Corbyn is a Czech spy and RED ROARS fake document is true.
You need help
I never said Corbyn was a Czech spy. I actually said the opposite, go check. I said spys have to be smart and unassuming, which Corbyn has never been.
Add SUN MAIL and GUIDO (i am not sure if you have heard of the latter) to your fake news list
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
I said until now their stories have checked out. If they have been found to publish bullshit fakery, I shall put them in the same bin as Sqwawkbox, Novara media and theCanary.
You still think Corbyn is a Czech spy and RED ROARS fake document is true.
You need help
I never said Corbyn was a Czech spy. I actually said the opposite, go check. I said spys have to be smart and unassuming, which Corbyn has never been.
Add SUN MAIL and GUIDO (i am not sure if you have heard of the latter) to your fake news list
As your taking to take back that false accusation that I made about Corbyn and the Czech spy?
And as I keep telling you I link to all sorts of media. This morning it has been the BBC, the Guardian, the Times and the Mail.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
Heigh ho Owls
I have to say I think somebody who has posted news from Skwawkbox and Novaro and then defended them even when the story was patently more false than the average Deutsches Nachrichten Buro bulletin should probably not shout too loudly about others posting stories from unverified sources.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
Heigh ho Owls
I have to say I think somebody who has posted news from Skwawkbox and Novaro and then defended them even when the story was patently more false than the average Deutsches Nachrichten Buro bulletin should probably not shout too loudly about others posting stories from unverified sources.
It looks a touch hypocritical.
As self aware as those complaining that Frank Field is a traitor because he voted with the other side a few times, when the messiah voted with the Tories more than Cameron.
Who are RedRoar? Is this the inverse of all those websites posting pro-Corbyn stories and with as much credibility, or are they legit? I don’t want to believe something on the web just because I want it to be true (I think that last sentance made sense..)
They are a left of centre site. So far their stories have been found to be legit (certainly in comparison to the likes of Sqwawkbox etc).
This latest FAKE document is FAKE FFS get a grip you stupid man
McDonnell confirms Labour policy is not to have a second EU referendum and would instead call for a general election first to judge any Deal or no Deal with the EU
So Labour will vote against any Brexit deal, in the hope that this will force a general election, where Labour will win a majority, and then be able to implement - er, what, exactly on Brexit?
BINO, with some kind of Cameron-esque Free Movement face-saver, and they'll pretend it's transitional. They'd blame the Tories for not leaving enough time to do anything else, which would have the virtue of being true.
I guess the SNP would vote for this too if he needs them; It removes most of the short-term practical downsides of Brexit for Scottish voters, but also gives them an upside for independence, because an independent Scotland could join the EU and get their influence back.
Why would an independent Scotland get its influence back in the EU, it would have gone from being one of 4 nations in the UK to one of 27 in the EU and a minnow at that compared to the likes of France and Germany and Italy and Spain and Poland.
Indeed Chequers Deal terms Brexit probably reduces the chances of Scottish independence a little as it avoids hard Brexit
And a giant compared to Malta, Luxembourg, Cyprus, Estonia, etc...
If the UK had a federal structure like the EU, Scotland's Remain vote would have constituted a veto on Brexit.
Not Luxembourg which currently has the EU Commission President and ECJ.
Given Qualified Majority voting on most Council of Minister decisions Scotland would have few if any vetoes on anything, especially with votes allocated based on population even with weighting
Ireland has twice held the position occupied by the current Eurosceptic bête noire Martin Selmayr. A country like Scotland wouldn't struggle for influence, especially if it were the closest member state to a large non-EU economy...
Scotland would be about 1.25% of the EU. It would get told what to do and like it. Just like Ireland is going to be when they are out of the Brexit limelight. (Watch that low corporate tax rate come into the Commission’s sights).
Now all of that may, or may not deter the Scots from independence or EU membership, that’s up to them. But given many of us as a bloc of 65m thought we had bugger all influence I find the notion of 5M in Scotland having some as faintly ridiculous.
LOL, it would be a million times better than Westminster, at least we would get a say.
Comments
AB:
Con: 39
Lab: 30
C1:
Con: 36
Lab: 38
C2:
Con: 29
Lab: 49
DE:
Con: 24
Lab: 55
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/sep/02/who-will-be-king-three-way-battle-for-control-rocks-international-chess
Some overs from Curran to give Rashid footmarks to bowl into would be sensible.
What we now have instead, is a bunch of hardcore Corbyn supporters, some of them party members, who have clearly shown themselves to be racist - and Corbyn completely impotent to do anything about it.
Is hodges trying to defend its accuracy?
It would if that is indeed what happened have been a silly oversight, especially given the length of time it took them to notice it, but it's not impossible that May was telling what she believed to be the truth.
I would have bowled Curran before a half fit Stokes, who is 5-10 mph down on his usual speed.
A few years ago England had it the other way round, when someone was given out caught off Broad despite no snicko or hotspot. The telly umpire thought he heard clear audio, and he probably did - as the bat hit the ground...
Blair was a totally different proposition to Corbyn and Boris is a more electorally appealing proposition than Hague. See the London 2012 Mayoral election where Boris led Livingstone 53% to 47% with C2DEs even in Labour London
http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/yzgh8vz2ll/YG-Archives-EveningStandard-MayoralElection-300412.pdf
https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1036213459103436800
https://twitter.com/Strontiumdog500/status/1036216495431471104?s=19
1) It was very expensive
2) It was easy to game, it was said put the right lotion on your bat it would negate hotspot.
That is vital for India, insofar as if either had gone, they were more doomed than a Blairite MP facing a deselection meeting.
No one seems capable of removing Corbyn, and he could be in Downing Street next year.
Cardiff vs Arsenal less so, but I note the Cardif goalkeeper does well on FF, top goalkeeper for points. Can he keep a clean sheet? They do seem tough to score against.
FAKE NEWS
PB Tories sinking to new depths this morning
Persuasive.
Okay, here goes with the hostage to fortune. Not many exciting markets up to be honest.
No Safety Car 1.9 £10
Vettel to lead first lap 2.76 £10
Ricciardo Top 6 LAY 2.1 £10
Hamilton Podium 1.33 £20
You need help
I said he was sympathetic to the cause of the Eastern block and would have had to been even moronic than I think he is not to realise who he was meeting.
Where as you spent weeks limbo dancing about how the Russian's didn't do Salisbury.
And as I keep telling you I link to all sorts of media. This morning it has been the BBC, the Guardian, the Times and the Mail.
I have to say I think somebody who has posted news from Skwawkbox and Novaro and then defended them even when the story was patently more false than the average Deutsches Nachrichten Buro bulletin should probably not shout too loudly about others posting stories from unverified sources.
It looks a touch hypocritical.
England can't expect or deserve to win given the shoddy front-order batting line up that they have.
Cricwiz model still has it as 80% chance of England win (which I think is way too high).
Worried that Change. Is. Coming?
Keep it up.
https://twitter.com/pokeefe1/status/1036199753221107712
Ok, things are improving, let's knock indy on the head.
Edit. 2 bets.
Campbell-Bannerman (two years)
Bonar Law (one year)
MacDonald (seven years)
Home (one year)
Blair (three years)
And that is not even counting Macmillan who considered himself Scottish but was born in London.