I wonder if our politics will become more like the USA as we leave the EU. Leadership candidates campaign to the edges of their parties, stand for election on slightly more centrist platforms then move to the centre in government as the constraints apply. Unless we have Corbyn or JRM who would be Trump like.
Whether on a Thursday or a Saturday it's always good to read a piece from David H for which as always many thanks.
The other side of the question is the degree to which the CoE is a potential leadership contender. There have been "non-political" Chancellors such as Barber, Lawson, Darling and arguably Hammond who are not leadership contenders but occupy the post either because of their technical knowledge or as a compromise.
No. The next Tory leader must (a) be comfortable in their own skin, (b) communicate well on TV and (c) sell sunny uplands. Anyone who cannot do this will lose the election.
When a party in government is choosing a new leader, it is choosing someone who is going to be Prime Minister. It should feel a responsibility to choose someone who has already demonstrated competence at the highest level.
That said, I agree with David Herdson that in practice the next in-government replacement of Prime Minister might well see a relative novice take over. Both main parties are showing collective irresponsibility and might well choose to indulge their party prejudices rather than consider the needs of the country.
The real problem for the Tories is that to sort out their predicament they need to be in opposition, yet they are lumbered in government with a leader who, despite her skills to tackle the current challenges (which are being under-appreciated amidst all the frothy-mouthed accusations), has already proven herself utterly unsuitable for taking the party into the next GE (barring, of course, the scenario where she is widely seen to have rescued the country from potential Brexit disaster). They need somebody new from left field like Cameron, yet such a person would be judged (and found wanting) as an immediate replacement PM.
Personally I think that the 'powers that be' are seeing Javid as the only answer to this conundrum.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
I understand Osborne is backing Gove whereas Dave is vehemently opposed to Gove.
What is a Cameroon supposed to do in those circumstances?
Dave's memoirs have been postponed for another year (what on earth does the man do all day?) so the nineteen chapters of reasons for not supporting Gove for deputy chief dog warden might not be in MPs' hands or minds by the time of the ballot.
No. The next Tory leader must (a) be comfortable in their own skin, (b) communicate well on TV and (c) sell sunny uplands. Anyone who cannot do this will lose the election.
You better take TSE's belt and shoe-laces. You've just described Boris....
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
I understand Osborne is backing Gove whereas Dave is vehemently opposed to Gove.
What is a Cameroon supposed to do in those circumstances?
I assume, unite against Boris?
I just can't see Gove as a PM. How could he enforce Cabinet discipline when he has been such a notorious leaker himself?
Gove, Brexit apart, is a One Nation Cameroon to his core, he'd be appealing if the alternatives were JRM or Boris.
I suspect Gove might be the only one able to sell a pragmatic Brexit to the country and the Tory Party.
I know he has huge flaws, I mean there was polling by Sir Lynton Crosby back in 2014 showing how badly Gove polled with the public, so Dave moved him from Education. That said Gove did help win the referendum.
The other issue many will have is Sarah Vine, aka Lady Macbeth without the charm.
No. The next Tory leader must (a) be comfortable in their own skin, (b) communicate well on TV and (c) sell sunny uplands. Anyone who cannot do this will lose the election.
All presentation and no content? Are we the voters really so shallow?
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
I understand Osborne is backing Gove whereas Dave is vehemently opposed to Gove.
What is a Cameroon supposed to do in those circumstances?
I assume, unite against Boris?
I just can't see Gove as a PM. How could he enforce Cabinet discipline when he has been such a notorious leaker himself?
Serial rebel Corbyn is still there, and Tory whip-dodger IDS hung around a bit too. There are better reasons for opposing Gove: the main ones being the public does not like him and he could start a fight in a phone box. Though it must be admitted that Dominic Cummings as head of the civil service might add to the gaiety of the nation.
Aye, great, indeed illustrious, minds think alike. Won’t be Johnny though....but Defence Secretary under Sajid or Jeremy in a few years time? Tom Tugendhart is also impressing.
I had backed Boris but have laid it back after the Corbyn antisemitism row because Boris is vulnerable on similar grounds so MPs won't risk him.
I still think Hammond is value provided we get any sort of smooth Brexit as reality converges with what he said (or read from a Treasury brief) when all this kicked off. After Brexit MPs will be looking for a safe pair of hands and a quiet life, not more excitement from a true believer.
Aye, great, indeed illustrious, minds think alike. Won’t be Johnny though....but Defence Secretary under Sajid or Jeremy in a few years time? Tom Tugendhart is also impressing.
I like Tom very much.
I suspect he'll be the next leader but one.
He'd nail Corbyn's bollocks to the wall on foreign and military policy.
From my perspective, I would probably prefer Gove to be next Tory leader. I feel he'd be a pretty good opponent for Labour to face at the next election, but he also seems semi-sane by Tory standards, so he wouldn't f' up the country in the meantime. Maybe Jeremy Hunt for similar reasons.
If I was a Tory supporter, concerned purely with who gives the best chance of winning an election, I'd probably go for Boris tbh (much as I think he'd be a God-awful PM). I just don't see anyone in the current Cabinet who is any more 'user-friendly' than Mrs May is; Javid seems to be the latest commentariat darling, but he comes across as incredibly charmless in interviews.
Aye, great, indeed illustrious, minds think alike. Won’t be Johnny though....but Defence Secretary under Sajid or Jeremy in a few years time? Tom Tugendhart is also impressing.
I like Tom very much.
I suspect he'll be the next leader but one.
He'd nail Corbyn's bollocks to the wall on foreign and military policy.
Hope so...but needs a Ministerial job first - ditto Mercer - and one on the domestic/economic side to show he has what it takes.
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
But tbh anyone other than Boris Johnson or Jacob Rees-Mogg will do me.
That's an interesting selection because you've rightly identified some cabinet ministers who are currently off the radar, but are gaining the vital experience of how government at the highest level actually works. This is the crucial reason why it has to be current or past cabinet minister, and preferably a senior one, for a mid-term in-government switchover.
For me, as things stand today, I don't think there are many who do have the right experience and who are potentially capable of commanding the support of colleagues and the party. I'd go:
1) Hunt or Javid, with Hunt just edging it 2) Gove
300) Boris Aaagh no!) JRM
There are however several others who in a year or so's time might be up to speed, so this is a fluid situation.
Aye, great, indeed illustrious, minds think alike. Won’t be Johnny though....but Defence Secretary under Sajid or Jeremy in a few years time? Tom Tugendhart is also impressing.
I like Tom very much.
I suspect he'll be the next leader but one.
He'd nail Corbyn's bollocks to the wall on foreign and military policy.
Anybody who was Green Slime in Afghanistan and Iraq might have a few enhanced interrogated skeletons in the cupboard...
I'm still morbidly intrigued to see what a Gavin Williamson leadership campaign would look like. I hope his political standing doesn't plunge so low that he doesn't even attempt to run.
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
Looks that way to me now. I have upped my exposure on Boris. Hunt would be big pay day, but honestly, at the moment, I think only Boris can beat Jezza, and the backbenchers will come to the same conclusion.
I'm still morbidly intrigued to see what a Gavin Williamson leadership campaign would look like. I hope his political standing doesn't plunge so low that he doesn't even attempt to run.
He'd play the role of Zanzibar in The Anglo-Zanzibar War.
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
The problem for him is that most MPs will think that "dull but capable" will be fine to beat Corbyn, and that after 6 years of ideologically-driven Brexit, the electorate might appreciate a bit of dullness.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
I'm still morbidly intrigued to see what a Gavin Williamson leadership campaign would look like. I hope his political standing doesn't plunge so low that he doesn't even attempt to run.
He'd play the role of Zanzibar in The Anglo-Zanzibar War.
You think he'd last the full 38 minutes? Big call.
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
The problem for him is that most MPs will think that "dull but capable" will be fine to beat Corbyn, and that after 6 years of ideologically-driven Brexit, the electorate might appreciate a bit of dullness.
That said, it's not an either-or.
A family member, who I regard as a bell-weather voter, who like most voters only pays fleeting attention to these things, told me the other day that 'Boris was right, we should ban the burkha, like France'. This person was stunned to be told that Boris had actually said it should not be banned.
I wonder how many other voters have thought the same?
But tbh anyone other than Boris Johnson or Jacob Rees-Mogg will do me.
That's an interesting selection because you've rightly identified some cabinet ministers who are currently off the radar, but are gaining the vital experience of how government at the highest level actually works. This is the crucial reason why it has to be current or past cabinet minister, and preferably a senior one, for a mid-term in-government switchover.
For me, as things stand today, I don't think there are many who do have the right experience and who are potentially capable of commanding the support of colleagues and the party. I'd go:
1) Hunt or Javid, with Hunt just edging it 2) Gove
300) Boris Aaagh no!) JRM
There are however several others who in a year or so's time might be up to speed, so this is a fluid situation.
David Herdson on a Thursday, my whole world is askew.
Yeah - I was on holiday last week, hence the absence of weekend articles. I'm still on annual leave so thought I'd drop an extra one in. Normal service will be resumed on Saturday.
Aye, great, indeed illustrious, minds think alike. Won’t be Johnny though....but Defence Secretary under Sajid or Jeremy in a few years time? Tom Tugendhart is also impressing.
I like Tom very much.
I suspect he'll be the next leader but one.
He'd nail Corbyn's bollocks to the wall on foreign and military policy.
Anybody who was Green Slime in Afghanistan and Iraq might have a few enhanced interrogated skeletons in the cupboard...
this might not be the disadvantage you seem to think it is.
I used to buy the telegraph. It has become a joke. It is now just a porn-mag for Colonel Blimps and neo-fascist Brexit fanatics. The odd thing is that in spite of all it's jingoistic rhetoric, it can't tell the difference between a Spitfire and Hurricane when it has a picture on its front page!
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
The problem for him is that most MPs will think that "dull but capable" will be fine to beat Corbyn, and that after 6 years of ideologically-driven Brexit, the electorate might appreciate a bit of dullness.
That said, it's not an either-or.
A family member, who I regard as a bell-weather voter, who like most voters only pays fleeting attention to these things, told me the other day that 'Boris was right, we should ban the burkha, like France'. This person was stunned to be told that Boris had actually said it should not be banned.
I wonder how many other voters have thought the same?
The other very important point to note - especially if you're betting - is that the sands can shift much more rapidly than people expect. Javid is now one of the front-runners, but when I surveyed the contenders as recently as April 27th he was 50/1 for Next Leader at Ladbrokes (and longer for Next PM, of course):
Boris is the only show in town. Burka-Gate was a masterstroke: it painted the rest of the Tory party as craven, politically-correct ninnies, whilst Boris alone was the speaker of forbidden truths and champion of the downtrodden and the silenced. He has the membership eating out of his hand, and the Brexit Ultras in parliament are already his. He just has to persuade the remaining MPs that dull but capable won't be enough to defeat the looming horror of Jezza and he's there.
The problem for him is that most MPs will think that "dull but capable" will be fine to beat Corbyn, and that after 6 years of ideologically-driven Brexit, the electorate might appreciate a bit of dullness.
That said, it's not an either-or.
A family member, who I regard as a bell-weather voter, who like most voters only pays fleeting attention to these things, told me the other day that 'Boris was right, we should ban the burkha, like France'. This person was stunned to be told that Boris had actually said it should not be banned.
I wonder how many other voters have thought the same?
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
TBH, his wife doesn’t come acoss as particularly pleasant, either. Which doesn’t help him.
No. The next Tory leader must (a) be comfortable in their own skin, (b) communicate well on TV and (c) sell sunny uplands. Anyone who cannot do this will lose the election.
All presentation and no content? Are we the voters really so shallow?
Yes they are. We live in an era of dumbed down education, Love Island and Trump. Those of us on PB are an irrelevance to society - we are outnumbered. It's bread and circuses now.
During my first week at BRNC the Commander of the College told us that those that had girlfriends at home should "stop being c***struck and get rid pronto". It was interesting to note that 100% of those that failed to follow this pithy advice failed to complete the course.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
Gove has one of those things which is the ultimate curse of a politician - a punchable face.
He also seems to try a bit too hard to be your mate. Faux chumminess is another curse.
But he is very bright and he seems to have settled in well to Environment. My lefty chums find him surprisingly acceptable in that post.
On reflection I suppose I did the reverse; dumped my then girl-friend when I went off to college. Experience from the previous year when I was the dumped suggested it there’d be many new opportunities......
For me, Gove falls into the trap of believing that all you need to do to succeed is be the smartest guy chap in the room. I've met many like him, and they never quite make it, due to their lack of emotional intelligence.
That said, I do rather admire him, and a Govite government would undoubtedly be more than a dull tinkerocracy.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
Gove has one of those things which is the ultimate curse of a politician - a punchable face.
He also seems to try a bit too hard to be your mate. Faux chumminess is another curse.
But he is very bright and he seems to have settled in well to Environment. My lefty chums find him surprisingly acceptable in that post.
Haha, yes you probably have nailed it. As someone who generally doesn't believe in violence (except when I used to play No6 when I was still young enough to play rugby), I have often worried how some public figures do have faces that bring out violent thoughts. I guess it will also align to some extent with one's values. The "Punchable face" top three for me would be Trump, Farage, Corbyn. The last one really troubles me as Corbyn is clearly such a weed, even when he was young. Perhaps a small slap or poke in the eye might be more appropriate?
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
TBH, his wife doesn’t come acoss as particularly pleasant, either. Which doesn’t help him.
You read my mind. I was literally thinking the same thing.
Michael Gove has somewhat less chance than George Osborne.
As someone professionally impressed by Gove, I don't get the hostility among some Tories and indeed the wider public. Yes, teachers don't like him. But otherwise, what seems to be the problem?
A good question. He has more credibility and integrity than his erstwhile chum and fellow journo-politician, but there is something slightly unpleasant about him that it is difficult to put one's finger on. Maybe it is smugness.
Gove does rather love plotting and gossip, perhaps explaining some of his popularity on PB.
He is rather Quixiotic in his undertakings, and while he does create change, is not a good finisher and leaves a mess behind for others to clear up. Brexit is just one of several examples of this.
The standout candidate is Gavin Williamson. Mature, erudite, personable and insightful, he the man with the wit and ideas to lead Britain out into the world.
Comments
What is a Cameroon supposed to do in those circumstances?
Whether on a Thursday or a Saturday it's always good to read a piece from David H for which as always many thanks.
The other side of the question is the degree to which the CoE is a potential leadership contender. There have been "non-political" Chancellors such as Barber, Lawson, Darling and arguably Hammond who are not leadership contenders but occupy the post either because of their technical knowledge or as a compromise.
That said, I agree with David Herdson that in practice the next in-government replacement of Prime Minister might well see a relative novice take over. Both main parties are showing collective irresponsibility and might well choose to indulge their party prejudices rather than consider the needs of the country.
Personally I think that the 'powers that be' are seeing Javid as the only answer to this conundrum.
I just can't see Gove as a PM. How could he enforce Cabinet discipline when he has been such a notorious leaker himself?
I suspect Gove might be the only one able to sell a pragmatic Brexit to the country and the Tory Party.
I know he has huge flaws, I mean there was polling by Sir Lynton Crosby back in 2014 showing how badly Gove polled with the public, so Dave moved him from Education. That said Gove did help win the referendum.
The other issue many will have is Sarah Vine, aka Lady Macbeth without the charm.
1. Javid/Hunt
2. Hammond
3. Gove
300. Johnson
1) Javid
2) Hunt
3) Johnny Mercer
1) Patel
2) McVey
3) Truss
4) Mogg
2) Gauke
3) Hunt
4) McVey
5) Javid
But tbh anyone other than Boris Johnson or Jacob Rees-Mogg will do me.
I had backed Boris but have laid it back after the Corbyn antisemitism row because Boris is vulnerable on similar grounds so MPs won't risk him.
I still think Hammond is value provided we get any sort of smooth Brexit as reality converges with what he said (or read from a Treasury brief) when all this kicked off. After Brexit MPs will be looking for a safe pair of hands and a quiet life, not more excitement from a true believer.
https://twitter.com/sarahduggers/status/1029514363122659328?s=21
I suspect he'll be the next leader but one.
He'd nail Corbyn's bollocks to the wall on foreign and military policy.
She's not my cup of tea, and she was one of the organisers of the March for Leadsom.
Honestly had I been Tory leader/Chief Whip at the time, I'd have expelled from the party anyone who attended that rally.
If I was a Tory supporter, concerned purely with who gives the best chance of winning an election, I'd probably go for Boris tbh (much as I think he'd be a God-awful PM). I just don't see anyone in the current Cabinet who is any more 'user-friendly' than Mrs May is; Javid seems to be the latest commentariat darling, but he comes across as incredibly charmless in interviews.
https://twitter.com/brexit/status/1030042828238286848?s=21
For me, as things stand today, I don't think there are many who do have the right experience and who are potentially capable of commanding the support of colleagues and the party. I'd go:
1) Hunt or Javid, with Hunt just edging it
2) Gove
300) Boris
Aaagh no!) JRM
There are however several others who in a year or so's time might be up to speed, so this is a fluid situation.
Pity about Amber...
https://twitter.com/toadmeister/status/1030012286314921985
https://twitter.com/toadmeister/status/1030027645440937984
That said, it's not an either-or.
How about, "I know I look young because I've managed to keep all my own hair, but..."
Remember, I'm a Labourite.
I wonder how many other voters have thought the same?
https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1030041181164658688
https://politicalbetting.vanillacommunity.com/discussion/comment/1905983/#Comment_1905983
He also seems to try a bit too hard to be your mate. Faux chumminess is another curse.
But he is very bright and he seems to have settled in well to Environment. My lefty chums find him surprisingly acceptable in that post.
Experience from the previous year when I was the dumped suggested it there’d be many new opportunities......
That said, I do rather admire him, and a Govite government would undoubtedly be more than a dull tinkerocracy.
Mature, erudite, personable and insightful, he the man with the wit and ideas to lead Britain out into the world.
He is rather Quixiotic in his undertakings, and while he does create change, is not a good finisher and leaves a mess behind for others to clear up. Brexit is just one of several examples of this.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/16/conservatives-call-for-lord-sheikh-to-be-expelled-from-party
Can you really blame the sector of the public who say they're not following this stuff?
Both *******.
(IMO).
The thought bubble above every squaddie's head reads 'Knob'.
Williamson and Williamson, brothers from a different mother, the perfect match for UK Plc.