Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Ukip are fielding candidates in three-quarters of the local

124»

Comments

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    @AndyJS
    Mrs Thatcher was a strong supporter of the campaign against global warming.

    Well we all know that she was far from perfect. ;)
  • BenMBenM Posts: 1,795
    Someone put the sharp objects away before Davidthecon hurts himself...
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,738
    tim said:

    @Alanbrooke

    People prepared to move country are always going to work harder, it's Darwinism,it's human nature,it's just a fact.
    Remember in the 70's when the Brits were shocked when shops opened on a Sunday, or till 8pm?

    The capitalist economy would work best if populations moved faster around.
    eg at the moment.
    swap a million Spanish twenty somethings for a million Brit retirees.
    The Spanish have the houses, we still need the young people.
    Wheres the downside, flights from Alicante to Stansted are plentiful, the weather is nice.

    yeah maybe, but I don't think housing prices or availabliity is the obstacle you think it is. I think the job seekers are just more keen and as you say willing to work harder.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,737
    Bloody hell see my Borussia Dortmund bet is still alive by the skin of 2 injury time goals teeth.
  • Fat_SteveFat_Steve Posts: 361
    @Tim 09:35
    Hasn't always been, all over the world
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Fiji
    Has always been more complicated and awkward than the left can possibly understand.

    But otherwise, good work.

  • Pulpstar said:

    Bloody hell see my Borussia Dortmund bet is still alive by the skin of 2 injury time goals teeth.

    We owe SeanT a big thank you for tipping them at 22/1

  • Anyone betting on the Masters Golf?

    Any tips?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,526


    “I told her about Nick Clegg’s plans to abolish the House of Lords,” he said. “She said, ‘Well, we should abolish the Liberal Democrats’.
    She was still capable of delivering the odd devastating one-liner.”

    Bloody bad form of Mr Burns not to have given us an example.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,720
    edited April 2013


    “I told her about Nick Clegg’s plans to abolish the House of Lords,” he said. “She said, ‘Well, we should abolish the Liberal Democrats’.
    She was still capable of delivering the odd devastating one-liner.”

    Bloody bad form of Mr Burns not to have given us an example.

    Would you like one of my devastating one liners? ahem.

    So there's reports of alcohol fuelled street parties all over Glasgow celebrating Maggie Thatcher's death..

    Or it could just be a Monday.
  • I'm not saying the people from Oldham are stupid but....

    Mugger stabs accomplice in Oldham park

    The mugging took place in Copster Park on Saturday evening

    Three men who stole mobile phones from children in a park - before getting involved in a fight in which one man stabbed another - are being sought by police.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22077525
  • davidthecondavidthecon Posts: 165
    tim said:

    @Davidthecon.

    Couldn't see Dave's posturing on the few thousand Eastern Europeans claiming benefits and going to the doctor infrequently working if there were suddenly an extra two million Brits on the Costa del Sol (leaving aside the fact that it's not going anywhere anyway)

    I've never ranted on about the wave of Polish etc immigration. I'm pretty sure that they and similar minded arrivals got on with working hard and paying taxes. As did the first wave of immigrants from the West Indies, all those from India and a fair number of first generation immigrants from Pakistan/Bangladsh. Unfortunately any space left in Britain, and I mean housing as well as street corners will be full of Roma next year. They won't claim any benefits or cause any crime at all. And they are all so extremely hardworking. Look deeper into your one world nonsense and try and justify that lot. Maybe you have a big garden to accomodate 10k or so of them?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,737

    Anyone betting on the Masters Golf?

    Any tips?

    Lay Woods ?
  • Pulpstar said:

    Anyone betting on the Masters Golf?

    Any tips?

    Lay Woods ?
    I thought he had turned over a new leaf, and keeps the snake inside the pet store.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    tim said:

    @Fat_Steve

    How does that relate to an immigrant being less likely to have a family when they move to find work therefore taking a bedsit or a shared room more easily, which was the discussion.

    It doesn't require a move of house. There are plenty of unemployed in East London who could catch a bus or tube each day to work in the hospitality or building trades in West or Central London. The fact that they very often do not do so shows lack of willingness to get out of bed rather than inability to move house.
  • davidthecondavidthecon Posts: 165
    BenM said:

    Someone put the sharp objects away before Davidthecon hurts himself...

    I'm in a good mood tonight Ben, no problem. If I do snap one day, it won't be self harm I'm afraid. I have unfinnished business with a newt loving ex mayor of London. But I'll keep taking the anti psychotics and wearing the straight jacket just in case!

    Some very sensible posts from you on here the last couple of days if I may say so.

    Repect.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,106
    2 more Thatcher anecdotes:
    When consulting with Whitelaw about which woman to bring into the cabinet, the subject of Thatcher came up and Heath said 'I have been warned about her, once she comes in we will never be able to get rid of her.'

    When meeting Christine Hamilton at a party Thatcher asked what she had been doing recently, to which Hamilton replied 'I'm a celebrity get me out of here' and Thatcher replied 'it would be rude to leave the party early!'
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    The manager of the Crouch End branch of Oddbins wine merchants has been suspended today after provoking outrage by promoting discounted Champagne on Twitter soon after news broke of Baroness Thatcher’s death.

    A tweet appeared on the store’s account this lunchtime reading: “If for any reason anyone feels like celebrating anything we have Taittinger available at £10 less than usual at £29. Just saying...”

    Despite no overt reference to the death of the former prime minister, the tweet was swiftly deleted and within hours Oddbins had suspended the store manager and issued an apology for the “completely inappropriate” missive.


    http://www.hamhighbroadway.co.uk/news/crouch_end_oddbins_manager_suspended_for_inappropriate_champagne_tweet_following_baroness_thatcher_s_death_twitter_margaret_1_2008978

    To be fair to Thatch I think she'd quite like the joke, and spend the Winter fuel allowance Dave was forcing her to take in the Ritz in a similar way if the Queen had popped off first.

    The stupid idiot deserves to be summarily dismissed for gross misconduct.

    The discount should have been offered on Pol Roger champagne alone.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,106
    sun/you gov poll on thatcher similar to guardian poll 24 hours before. was she overall good PM 52%, overall bad 30%.
  • davidthecondavidthecon Posts: 165
    tim said:

    @Davidthecon

    I've been looking for someone to put some money on Migration Watch's estimates for Bulgarian and Romanian immigration to the UK for a while now, you fancy it?

    I would if the figures will ever be published transparently and accurately. Which they won't. Far better for us to just moan at the Government in a years time whe will have done zero to stop it. It's gonna get ugle
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    @Avery.

    Oddbins only sell the Pol Roger Non Vintage, which in comparing thatcher to Churchill may be apposite.
    Although given the Saudi Arabian links with her son it's either thirty lashes or Evian.

    Nonetheless it is a Grande Mark.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,106
    Russell Brand on an encounter with the Iron Lady and his views on her passing
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russell-brand/margaret-thatcher-our-unm_b_3046390.html?utm_hp_ref=tw
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    RT @DanHannanMEP: A question to all the Lefties complaining that Margaret Thatcher closed coal-mines. Are you, after all, in favour of burning coal?
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited April 2013
    More good news on the economy I'm afraid. I am trying to ration the posts in this period of mourning but there is just too much of it about.

    Paul Fisher, the Bank of England's Excecutive Director for Markets, has given an interview to the Scottish Herald.

    The little dove that he is saw him calling for more QE and side-stepping questions about new monetary policies (will be discussed in August after Carney arrives) but what really surprised the markets was his comment on short term prospects for growth in the UK economy.

    Here is the quote that has got City pulses racing:

    "I expect North Sea oil at least to bottom out shortly and possibly start increasing and construction to be no worse than flat – that would in itself lead to some pick-up in GDP numbers."

    Cautious words as always from a veteran central banker, but a few forecasts are being quickly revised upwards by City analysts. The kick-in from oil production wasn't due to start until 2014.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Has any PBTory come up with a robust defence of Thatcher's section 28 legislation ?

    How does it sync with Cameron's gay marriage act ?

    Why are the Tories always behind the curve ?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Plato:

    RT @DanHannanMEP: A question to all the Lefties complaining that Margaret Thatcher closed coal-mines. Are you, after all, in favour of burning coal?
    Quote

    Yes, clean coal !
  • surbiton said:

    Has any PBTory come up with a robust defence of Thatcher's section 28 legislation ?

    How does it sync with Cameron's gay marriage act ?

    Why are the Tories always behind the curve ?

    Thatcher got it wrong on Section 28

    Which is surprising as she had no problems with homosexuals as she appointed quite a few and voted for Leo Abse's bill to decriminalise homosexuality.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281

    Thatcher got it wrong on Section 28

    Which is surprising as she had no problems with homosexuals as she appointed quite a few and voted for Leo Abse's bill to decriminalise homosexuality.

    And also agreed to Fowler's massive AiDS campaign which saved the lives of tens of thousands of gay men...
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    AveryLP said:

    More good news on the economy I'm afraid. I am trying to ration the posts in this period of mourning but there is just too much of it about.

    Avery, two words spring to mind:

    bottom, barrel.

  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    surbiton said:

    Has any PBTory come up with a robust defence of Thatcher's section 28 legislation ?

    How does it sync with Cameron's gay marriage act ?

    Why are the Tories always behind the curve ?

    Thatcher got it wrong on Section 28

    Which is surprising as she had no problems with homosexuals as she appointed quite a few and voted for Leo Abse's bill to decriminalise homosexuality.
    Leo Abse bill in the 1960s that made it legal for consenting blokes to do what they wanted to do, I believe.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Thatcher got it wrong on Section 28

    Which is surprising as she had no problems with homosexuals as she appointed quite a few and voted for Leo Abse's bill to decriminalise homosexuality.
    And also agreed to Fowler's massive AiDS campaign which saved the lives of tens of thousands of gay men...

    So, Screaming Carlotta, why did she get it so badly wrong ? Was she an outsider in the party ?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,997
    AveryLP said:

    More good news on the economy I'm afraid. I am trying to ration the posts in this period of mourning but there is just too much of it about.

    If that is said consistently for years, and by and large it has ('grass shoots', 'glimmers of hope' and all that talk we've heard before), eventually it will become true. But the government would be wise not to expect a prize for finally, finally getting it right when they say it, as eventually it had to become true regardless.
  • surbiton said:

    Thatcher got it wrong on Section 28

    Which is surprising as she had no problems with homosexuals as she appointed quite a few and voted for Leo Abse's bill to decriminalise homosexuality.
    And also agreed to Fowler's massive AiDS campaign which saved the lives of tens of thousands of gay men...
    So, Screaming Carlotta, why did she get it so badly wrong ? Was she an outsider in the party ?

    I was once told, as a heterosexual, she was definitely a minority in the Tory Party.

    Sometimes politicians get it wrong.

    There was a piece in telegraph a while back, which said she was incorrectly portrayed as a social conservative.

    She wasn't, her views on Cecil Parkinson's philandering not being a resigning matter for example, but she chastised him for never seeing his child.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    kle4 said:

    AveryLP said:

    More good news on the economy I'm afraid. I am trying to ration the posts in this period of mourning but there is just too much of it about.

    If that is said consistently for years, and by and large it has ('grass shoots', 'glimmers of hope' and all that talk we've heard before), eventually it will become true. But the government would be wise not to expect a prize for finally, finally getting it right when they say it, as eventually it had to become true regardless.
    Like in the 90's when growth finally came, Tories got zero thanks for it. After all, they massively f*cked up on the ERM, a precursor to the Euro, which the Tories, Howe, Lawson and Major wanted to join. Of course, Heseltine. So did Blair. But little is said about Brown's opposition alongwith Balls.

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    surbiton said:

    I was once told, as a heterosexual, she was definitely a minority in the Tory Party.

    Sometimes politicians get it wrong.

    There was a piece in telegraph a while back, which said she was incorrectly portrayed as a social conservative.

    She wasn't, her views on Cecil Parkinson's philandering not being a resigning matter for example, but she chastised him for never seeing his child.
    Section 28 was nothing short of McCarthyite type witch hunting. This was in the 80's - not the 50's.

    What was Dave Cameron's view on Section 28, I wonder ?

  • JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    @surbiton

    Any quotes from the early 90's where Brown opposed the ERM?

    I've heard this claim before but never seen any evidence for it.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,997
    As someone too young to remember the Thatcher years, what hope the intensity of worship and hatred will finally begin to die down in years to come when she is brought up?

    I mean, I've said before the attempts to use Thatcher as a reason to vote for or against someone (it's usually against) wears painfully thin on me, and even among the levels of political hyperbole, the extent of hatred toward the woman is scary to me, perhaps because however bad her policies were for people or the country (assuming for a moment everything her opponent say about her is true), it clearly is not as bad as they claim as the country's doing alright.

    Ok, we have many deep and extensive problems, some of which go back a long way, but the extent of the rage is still disporportionate and so puts me off; an analagous matter I like to use is teaching of deforestation when I was at school -I'm no climate change sceptic, but if the rainforests were being depleted as fast as I was told it was in school (even with increased replanting or whatever), we wouldn't have any left by now, and it makes people quesiton the whole business.

    I fear Thatcher's name will continue to inspire such horrid and inspiring intensity in years to come. Perhaps she would even have preferred it that way.

    Oh well, at least they're not turning her office into a museum (see link)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-22080932
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,230
    tim said:

    Blimey, Newsnight running a piece about mandatory vaccination for children.

    Maybe we should have a Comic Relief Special aimed at the twats who disagree

    Well they certainly need help. ;-)
  • currystarcurrystar Posts: 1,171
    HurstLlama
    8:01PM
    "We are currently advertising now for more apprentices and amazingly have received just one application. We have tried the government scheme where you get £2000 towards costs if you employ someone who has been out of work for over 6 months aged 18-24. We have not had a single application through that route. How mad is that? youngsters dont seem to want the jobs we are offering."

    Mr. Star, that is so depressing. What part of the country are you in?

    We are based in Eastleigh, I have even tried to contact our new local MP to see if he can help with the Apprentice scheme administrators to see if he can get the wheels in motion, he has yet to respond.

    In regard to the state of the building industry around here I would have to agree with a previous poster that it is booming, we are turning away tenders on a daily basis as we are busy enough (you have to watch the cashflow). We have a regular discussions at work regarding all the depressing economic data on the news, that feels a world away from here, we have never been as busy.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    tim said:

    Blimey, Newsnight running a piece about mandatory vaccination for children.

    Maybe we should have a Comic Relief Special aimed at the twats who disagree

    There are significant ethical issues in making any medical treatment mandatory. People may make the wrong decision, they may be poorly informed, they may buy snake oil from Wakefield and his mob, but they have the right to be stupid. It is one of the aspects of freedom that are part of the British way of life. Make a decision and live with the consequences.
  • Tonight's yougov

    CON 33%, LAB 41%, LD 10%, UKIP 10%.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,597
    A query received from a non-Labour candidate X about another one Y from a different party. Y's nomination papers were seconded by someone Z who moved out of the area a few weeks ago. X asks whether the nomination is legal - is the test that Z currently lives in the area, or that he's not yet got round to taking his name off the register?

    I've referred him to the ERO (not sure why he came to me!), but maybe someone here knows?
  • Tonight's yougov

    CON 33%, LAB 41%, LD 10%, UKIP 10%.

    Which by my quick calculations, are changes from yesterday

    Cons +3

    Labour +1

    LD - 2

    UKIP - 2

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Fatcha bounce in the yougov.

  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited April 2013
    Regular readers may have noticed that I defer to no-one in my admiration for Margaret Thatcher, by miles the greatest peacetime British PM for at least the last century, and one of the greatest world political figures of any of our lifetimes.

    All the same: the coverage of her death is getting ridiculous. She has died at the ripe age of 87, after a period of illness; there was no sudden horrific shock or tragic accident. This was a death in the natural term of things, to be marked with dignity, reflection and respect, not an orgy of media hype. I don't see why parliament is being recalled: MPs of all parties have already issued their statements of tribute, such as Ed Miliband's dignified and well-judged one. Why do we need a parliamentary sitting as well? What can possibly be added to what has already been said?
  • Why do we need a parliamentary sitting as well? What can possibly be added to what has already been said?

    So we can see Dennis Skinner etc scowling and being as gracious as Alex Ferguson is when Man U lose?

  • JamesKellyJamesKelly Posts: 1,348
    I have a confession to make. I was at the Glasgow 'party' yesterday - for about thirty seconds, by complete accident. My eye was caught by the communist flags and a TV van, so I wandered over to find out what was going on.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,603

    Tonight's yougov

    CON 33%, LAB 41%, LD 10%, UKIP 10%.

    Which by my quick calculations, are changes from yesterday

    Cons +3

    Labour +1

    LD - 2

    UKIP - 2

    YouGov/The Sunil:

    Governing Parties 43%
    Labour 41%
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413

    So we can see Dennis Skinner etc scowling and being as gracious as Alex Ferguson is when Man U lose?

    True, we do have that to look forward to. The lady would have expected nothing less from Dennis. It's amazing that he is still there scowling.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    tim said:

    @Foxinsox

    Make a decision and live with the consequences.

    And let other peoples children live with the consequences.

    I was making a distinction by the way between the US contributors definition of mandatory and compulsory.
    If you don't want to vaccinate then no one is going to force you but you can't work in hospitals or send your children to schools.
    We made seat belts compulsory.

    It is already a requirement for my employment that I am immunised and tested for Hep B, which I do not think unreasonable considering the potential hazard to my patients

    Making vaccination an essential requirement for school would be a step too far for my liking. I do not like coercion, it threatens the doctor/nurse patient relationship.

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    A query received from a non-Labour candidate X about another one Y from a different party. Y's nomination papers were seconded by someone Z who moved out of the area a few weeks ago. X asks whether the nomination is legal - is the test that Z currently lives in the area, or that he's not yet got round to taking his name off the register?

    I've referred him to the ERO (not sure why he came to me!), but maybe someone here knows?

    If "Z" lived in the area at the time he seconded the papers, the nomination should be fine.The only problem could arise if Z then informs Y that he is leaving/left the area before nominations close. Hardly likely given the amount of time available.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,106
    Virginia GOP governor candidate defends law banning oral sex
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yqg3-paBPo
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    tim said:

    @Foxinsox

    Make a decision and live with the consequences.

    And let other peoples children live with the consequences.

    I was making a distinction by the way between the US contributors definition of mandatory and compulsory.
    If you don't want to vaccinate then no one is going to force you but you can't work in hospitals or send your children to schools.
    We made seat belts compulsory.

    It is already a requirement for my employment that I am immunised and tested for Hep B, which I do not think unreasonable considering the potential hazard to my patients

    Making vaccination an essential requirement for school would be a step too far for my liking. I do not like coercion, it threatens the doctor/nurse patient relationship.

    I believe it would be perfectly reasonable. A parent cannot put the children of others in catching measles due to the parent's decision.

    We have rights but also responsibilities.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    The tribute sitting when John Smith died had 17 speakers

    Major
    Beckett (as Labour acting leader)
    Ashdown
    James Molyneaux of UUP
    Neil Kinnock
    Margaret Ewing SNP
    Sir Peter Emery Con
    Tony Benn
    Gerald Kaufman
    Bill Walker Lab
    Doug Hoyle Lab
    Ieuan Wyn Jones Plaid
    Dennis Canavan Lab
    Sir Marcus Fox on behalf of parliamentary back benchers
    Colin Shepherd on behalf of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
    Menzies
    Dennis Skinner
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited April 2013

    Mick_Pork said:

    Superb comedy from Lord Saatchi as he displays precisely why nobody should ever believe public relations wonks.

    No, he was actually arguing that the best advertising in the world cannot save a poor product - something Saatchi (which I worked with for two decades) fervently believed in.....


    Why am I not surprised. The best spin in the world cannot support an untenable argument never mind that attempt at spin. He tried to claim he didn't do anything for Thatcher which was rightly laughed at. Not content with that ludicrous claim he piled on the stupidity when the obvious retort came up, 'was he asking people to believe he had fleeced the tory party out of millions for doing nothing'? He then tried to claim that was exactly the case to yet more laughter.

    Public relations idiocy is always amusing.




  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    More good news on the economy I'm afraid. I am trying to ration the posts in this period of mourning but there is just too much of it about.

    Avery, two words spring to mind:

    bottom, barrel.

    Naughty, surbiton.

    Your comments about relative GDP growth in Europe over the past decade were also inaccurate but in deference to the late departed I will delay posting the correct figures until we get a gap in the flow of good news and Maggie is in her Mausoleum.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    HYUFD said:

    Virginia GOP governor candidate defends law banning oral sex

    Is oral sex left wing ?
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited April 2013
    So tomorrow we can expect

    Dave
    EdM
    Nick (but where will he talk from? It's a podium for 2)
    Angus Robertson of SNP
    Elfyn Llwyd
    DUP
    Sir Tapsell
    Graham Brady
    Menzies
    Skinner
    Heath's ghost
    Ken Clarke
    Malcolm Rifkind
    an me old Labourite (Jack Straw perhaps)
    Mike Freeer (MP for Finchley)
    Nick Boles (as MP for Grantham where she was born)
  • JamesKellyJamesKelly Posts: 1,348
    "The tribute sitting when John Smith died had 17 speakers"

    Skinner was superb - his parting shot was to say that as a tribute to Smith, parliament should pass the disability rights legislation unanimously.
  • surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    Virginia GOP governor candidate defends law banning oral sex

    Is oral sex left wing ?
    I'd say right wing, but you might find that hard to swallow.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited April 2013


    Why do we need a parliamentary sitting as well? What can possibly be added to what has already been said?

    We need a parliamentary sitting so that the government can pass a motion to grant the Blessed Margaret a full state funeral.

    And then to blame its passing on the unwillingness of Labour MPs to get up off their Easter sofas and do a paid day's work in the House of Commons.
  • So tomorrow we can expect

    Dave
    EdM
    Nick (but where will he talk from? It's a podium for 2)
    Angus Robertson of SNP
    Elfyn Llwyd
    DUP
    Sir Tapsell
    Graham Brady
    Menzies
    Skinner
    Heath's ghost
    Ken Clarke
    Malcolm Rifkind
    an me old Labourites (Jack Straw perhaps)
    Mike Freeer (MP for Finchley)
    Nick Boles (as MP for Grantham where she was born)

    Probably expect John Whittingdale and Sir Gerald Howarth to make contributions from when they worked for her.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    surbiton said:

    tim said:

    @Foxinsox

    Make a decision and live with the consequences.

    And let other peoples children live with the consequences.

    I was making a distinction by the way between the US contributors definition of mandatory and compulsory.
    If you don't want to vaccinate then no one is going to force you but you can't work in hospitals or send your children to schools.
    We made seat belts compulsory.

    It is already a requirement for my employment that I am immunised and tested for Hep B, which I do not think unreasonable considering the potential hazard to my patients

    Making vaccination an essential requirement for school would be a step too far for my liking. I do not like coercion, it threatens the doctor/nurse patient relationship.

    I believe it would be perfectly reasonable. A parent cannot put the children of others in catching measles due to the parent's decision.

    We have rights but also responsibilities.
    surbiton said:

    tim said:

    @Foxinsox

    Make a decision and live with the consequences.

    And let other peoples children live with the consequences.

    I was making a distinction by the way between the US contributors definition of mandatory and compulsory.
    If you don't want to vaccinate then no one is going to force you but you can't work in hospitals or send your children to schools.
    We made seat belts compulsory.

    It is already a requirement for my employment that I am immunised and tested for Hep B, which I do not think unreasonable considering the potential hazard to my patients

    Making vaccination an essential requirement for school would be a step too far for my liking. I do not like coercion, it threatens the doctor/nurse patient relationship.

    I believe it would be perfectly reasonable. A parent cannot put the children of others in catching measles due to the parent's decision.

    We have rights but also responsibilities.
    I am not anti-vaccine. My children had the MMR and other vaccinations on schedule.

    I would not be willing to vaccinate a child without the parents free and un-coerced consent. To do so could be an assault in law.

    Seatbelts are different. They are compulsory for medical reasons, but the law is enforced by police officers. Doctors and nurses are not involved in the enforcement, so these laws do not infringe the relationship with patients.

    I do not want a doctor to act as an agent of the state, for what the state considers its best interests. Doctors should act in co-operation with the patient concerning agreed patient objectives. It is fundamental to the role of a doctor, and not to be discarded lightly.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714

    "The tribute sitting when John Smith died had 17 speakers"

    Skinner was superb - his parting shot was to say that as a tribute to Smith, parliament should pass the disability rights legislation unanimously.

    "In my opinion, he dragged the Labour party from the depths of despair to the pinnacles of power. No greater tribute could be paid to him today than if, instead of adjourning at this moment, we were to say, "John Smith, we are going to pass the Civil Rights (Disabled Persons) Bill unanimously today." That is what we should do in his memory. "
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited April 2013
    Former Italian PM and EU Commission President Prodi said yersterday that Thatcher's legacy is the current economic crisis.....
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 53,219
    The Sun seem to be trying to make up for today's front page with the 'Maggie Wins Again' headline.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited April 2013

    Former Italian PM and EU Commission President Prodi said yersterday that Thatcher's legacy is the current economic crisis.....

    Prodi is not as well known in the UK as di Canio, Andrea.

    I think Paolo's views will prevail and a diplomatic crisis will thereby be avoided.

    Italy does a good job at mourning the loss of the English great and good. I remember well Pavarotti's grand entrance to Westminster Abbey at Princess Diana's funeral. Perhaps Berlusconi can be persuaded to represent Italy at Maggie's send off.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 125,106
    Tim - Indeed, Surbiton - Well its most well known exponent was Bill Clinton, but I think were this law to be enforced it would make Major's 'back to basics' look like nothing for the GOP!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,603
    tim said:

    @foxinsox

    Doctors are involved in section ing under the mental health act.

    Anyway, no one forces Australian parents to have their children vaccinated, they can set up their own nurseries and schools.

    Did you hear about the toothbrush salesman who went beserk? He was sectioned under the dental health act.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,597
    edited April 2013
    surbiton said:

    A query received from a non-Labour candidate X about another one Y from a different party. Y's nomination papers were seconded by someone Z who moved out of the area a few weeks ago. X asks whether the nomination is legal - is the test that Z currently lives in the area, or that he's not yet got round to taking his name off the register?

    I've referred him to the ERO (not sure why he came to me!), but maybe someone here knows?

    If "Z" lived in the area at the time he seconded the papers, the nomination should be fine.The only problem could arise if Z then informs Y that he is leaving/left the area before nominations close. Hardly likely given the amount of time available.

    The plot thickens, in that case. Y was indeed very well aware that Z had left the area when nominations closed, as Z was a retiring County Councillor (retiring because he's moved to Somerset) and Y is a party colleague standing to replace him. X, a rival of Z, is presumably wondering if Y could be disqualified.

    Labour is standing against both of them so we sort of don't care, but I'm intrigued anyway.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    tim said:

    @foxinsox

    Doctors are involved in section ing under the mental health act.

    Anyway, no one forces Australian parents to have their children vaccinated, they can set up their own nurseries and schools.

    There are protections built into the mental health act restricting its use and with safeguards against abuse.

    If the Australian law is as you suggest then there cannot be herd immunity.

    It is interesting that you consider the the compulsory medicating of the the public acceptable, but compulsory workfare an abuse. Funny old world. Goodnight.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281
    Of all the anti-Thatcher front pages, I think Liberation in Paris wins for a pithy representation of their view of her, and her passing - "La Grande Faucheuse" - "The Grim Reaper"

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-y1awFrtSDwQ/UWNdAC3K9NI/AAAAAAAADPY/YWL4BPjxMyQ/s1600/BHW6bggCUAAnbt0.jpg-large.jpeg
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,281
    Meanwhile, Thatcher's passing still dominates Amazon music downloads - 4 new entries in the past two days - three versions of Ding Dong the witch is dead and "Tramp the Dirt Down"....
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    The Northern Echo find the man who shouted at her "where are the jobs?" in Teesside 26 years ago

    http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/indepth/margaret_thatcher/10342091.Jobseeker_who_stopped_Maggie_in____wilderness___/?ref=rl

  • carlcarl Posts: 750

    Meanwhile, Thatcher's passing still dominates Amazon music downloads - 4 new entries in the past two days - three versions of Ding Dong the witch is dead

    Three version?! Bloody split vote, it'll never get to Number 1 in the charts now. Typical of the Left.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited April 2013

    The Northern Echo find the man who shouted at her "where are the jobs?" in Teesside 26 years ago

    That is a great article, Andrea. And one which captures the ambivalence people feel towards Thatcher and her power both to attract and repel.

    Eric Fletcher was a lucky man. His clash with Thatcher seems to have got him the job after a "thousand" rejections.

    It is worth quoting the middle paragraphs in full:

    “She was a very arrogant woman at the time. She didn’t want to know me. All the people were there cheering her, she was more than happy to talk to them, but she didn’t want anything to do with me.

    “I asked her about the jobs, and all she said was ‘retrain, young man’. I started to explain that I didn’t know about computers, that I couldn’t get a job like that, but she just turned her back on me and walked away.”

    Mr Fletcher did receive a letter the next day from the job centre, asking him to go down and talk to them about a job, but he does not thank Mrs Thatcher.

    “It was done to keep me quiet, that’s what I think. I did get a job at Billingham Press not long after that, but that was down to my hard work.”

    Starting as a manual labourer, he has worked for the company for the past 25 years, eventually becoming a binder, without ever having to retrain.

    But, despite his run-in with the Iron Lady, he says he did feel sorry for her family after hearing about her death. He said: “I do respect her and what she did. There have been some nasty things put on Facebook about her and I don’t agree with that.

    “She was a strong woman, and she did some very good things for the country, just not for the working classes – and not for people like me.”


    The very stuff of a legend.
  • carlcarl Posts: 750
    And I was never really a fan of "Tramp the Dirt Down", could have been better musically.

    Though it is incredibly powerful.

    I saw a newspaper picture from the political
    campaign
    A woman was kissing a child, who was obviously
    in pain
    She spills with compassion, as that young child's
    face in her hands she grips
    Can you imagine all that greed and avarice
    coming down on that child's lips
    Well I hope I don't die too soon
    I pray the Lord my soul to save
    Oh I'll be a good boy, I'm trying so hard to behave
    Because there's one thing I know, I'd like to live
    long enough to savour
    That's when they finally put you in the ground
    I'll stand on your grave and tramp the dirt down

    When England was the whore of the world
    Margeret [sic] was her madam
    And the future looked as bright and as clear as
    the black tarmacadam
    Well I hope that she sleeps well at night, isn't
    haunted by every tiny detail
    'Cos when she held that lovely face in her hands
    all she thought of was betrayal

    And now the cynical ones say that it all ends
    the same in the long run
    Try telling that to the desperate father who just
    squeezed the life from his only son
    And how it's only voices in your head and
    dreams you never dreamt
    Try telling him the subtle difference between
    justice and contempt
    Try telling me she isn't angry with this pitiful
    discontent
    When they flaunt it in your face as you line up
    for punishment
    And then expect you to say "Thank you"
    straighten up, look proud and pleased
    Because you've only got the symptoms, you
    haven't got the whole disease
    Just like a schoolboy, whose head's like a tin-can
    filled up with dreams then poured down
    the drain
    Try telling that to the boys on both sides, being
    blown to bits or beaten and maimed
    Who takes all the glory and none of the shame

    Well I hope you live long now, I pray the Lord
    your soul to keep
    I think I'll be going before we fold our arms
    and start to weep
    I never thought for a moment that human life
    could be so cheap
    'Cos when they finally put you in the ground
    They'll stand there laughing and tramp the
    dirt down
  • JamesKellyJamesKelly Posts: 1,348
    My latest article in the International Business Times -

    'It isn't Altruistic to Impose an Unwanted Labour Government on England'

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/455220/20130409/scotland-england.htm
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790

    A query received from a non-Labour candidate X about another one Y from a different party. Y's nomination papers were seconded by someone Z who moved out of the area a few weeks ago. X asks whether the nomination is legal - is the test that Z currently lives in the area, or that he's not yet got round to taking his name off the register?

    I've referred him to the ERO (not sure why he came to me!), but maybe someone here knows?

    If Z is still on the electoral register, he is still eligible to vote in the area and is therefore still eligible to nominate a candidate. Until and unless Z has finished the process of moving home and has eliminated his name from the register at his old address, it is none of the Returning Officer's business to enquire about the timing or precise location of Z's moving or residence. The fact that Z is on the register, and the fact that Z has nominated Y, is sufficient evidence that Z is eligible. The general rule is that the RO has to accept what is on the face of the nomination paper and can't go off on his own initiative making further enquiries about where Z might be sleeping on a particular date.

  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    edited April 2013

    The plot thickens, in that case. Y was indeed very well aware that Z had left the area when nominations closed, as Z was a retiring County Councillor (retiring because he's moved to Somerset) and Y is a party colleague standing to replace him. X, a rival of Z, is presumably wondering if Y could be disqualified.

    Labour is standing against both of them so we sort of don't care, but I'm intrigued anyway.

    It doesn't matter who knew what when about where Z might be living, on a particular date, or for how long. The only things of relevance to the Returning Officer are (a) is Z on the electoral register, and listed as eligible to vote in the election for which he has nominated a candidate? and (b) has Z signed the nomination paper of Y? In both cases, the answer is yes.
  • Y0kelY0kel Posts: 2,307
    edited April 2013
    Syria, briefly.

    I noted last night that Ayman Al Zawahiri, Bin Laden buddy and now big chiefie himself released a video calling for Islamists to fight to win in Syria and set up a Caliphate.

    He' a shrewd oul fella who tends to release a video just before something of note occurs, some kind of Al Qaeda strike or other event.

    His hot streak has continued. Today Al Qaeda linked radicals in Iraq and Syria announced a tie up. Iraq, for those who don't know, is in the midst of a serious upsurge of Sunni radical violence so it isn't insignificant.

    Caliphate indeed, but don't bet that is all Ayman is getting at. There may be more.

    Korea: For those who think the North is bluffing, the amount of effort being expended and communications being sent between US forces around the Pacific suggests they are not taking the risk that this business will just settle down without more ripples. Apart from the potential launch of a missile for testing and show of force there are those who fear the Kim's lads are cooking up some kind of real provocation, one that would not necessarily trigger a major response (for example deniable or taking time to prove) but certainly is going to risk lives.
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    Oops!

    A subtitle caption on a video on the daily Telegraph website labels Anne Scargill as "Widow of Arthur Scargill". Are we allowed to laugh?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/margaret-thatcher/9981256/Anne-Scargill-Thatcher-was-an-evil-woman.html
This discussion has been closed.