politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Monday morning cartoon
Helen Cochrane and Nicholas Leonard have given an interview to Cable Magazine about their cartoons and the world of cartoons, the interview can be read here.
@tconnellyRTE: An EU source has told @rtenews there has been no breakthrough in the overnight talks between British, European Commission and Irish officials on the Irish border issue post Brexit. It now looks unlikely the Irish cabinet will have a text to approve when it meets in Dublin at 9am
All very predictable down under. I wonder how much BT wasted on buying the rights.
£80 million. Five year deal for all international cricket in Australia plus The Big Bash.
Covers one Ashes series.
£8m would have been more realistic. The time zone makes it something for the diehards, and there’s not going to be many of those left after this match.
All very predictable down under. I wonder how much BT wasted on buying the rights.
£80 million. Five year deal for all international cricket in Australia plus The Big Bash.
Covers one Ashes series.
£8m would have been more realistic. The time zone makes it something for the diehards, and there’s not going to be many of those left after this match.
Very poor effort by England again. What I have found irritating about BT is the lack of a catch up facility, Given that watching through the night is really not viable I would like to see some play when I have time.
All very predictable down under. I wonder how much BT wasted on buying the rights.
£80 million. Five year deal for all international cricket in Australia plus The Big Bash.
Covers one Ashes series.
£8m would have been more realistic. The time zone makes it something for the diehards, and there’s not going to be many of those left after this match.
Very poor effort by England again. What I have found irritating about BT is the lack of a catch up facility, Given that watching through the night is really not viable I would like to see some play when I have time.
They could do a three or four minute show of all the England highlights.
All very predictable down under. I wonder how much BT wasted on buying the rights.
£80 million. Five year deal for all international cricket in Australia plus The Big Bash.
Covers one Ashes series.
£8m would have been more realistic. The time zone makes it something for the diehards, and there’s not going to be many of those left after this match.
Very poor effort by England again. What I have found irritating about BT is the lack of a catch up facility, Given that watching through the night is really not viable I would like to see some play when I have time.
That’s annoying - although not as annoying as being up at 7am praying England can get 75 runs for the last three wickets to avoid the follow on and a certain innings defeat.
Sky used to do a full day’s replay starting at 11am, then a 90-minute highlights package at 7pm which I thought was pretty much perfect for the various audiences.
All very predictable down under. I wonder how much BT wasted on buying the rights.
£80 million. Five year deal for all international cricket in Australia plus The Big Bash.
Covers one Ashes series.
£8m would have been more realistic. The time zone makes it something for the diehards, and there’s not going to be many of those left after this match.
Very poor effort by England again. What I have found irritating about BT is the lack of a catch up facility, Given that watching through the night is really not viable I would like to see some play when I have time.
That’s annoying - although not as annoying as being up at 7am praying England can get 75 runs for the last three wickets to avoid the follow on.
Sky used to do a full day’s replay starting at 11am, then a 90-minute highlights package at 7pm which I thought was pretty much perfect for the various audiences.
Yes, they have a much more flexible and comprehensive platform than BT which allows them to get better value from their sports coverage. BT's set up looks really old fashioned by comparison, like back in the days we really had channels.
Not sure if Australia would/will enforce the follow on. Their quicks are doing a lot of work.
@tconnellyRTE: An EU source has told @rtenews there has been no breakthrough in the overnight talks between British, European Commission and Irish officials on the Irish border issue post Brexit. It now looks unlikely the Irish cabinet will have a text to approve when it meets in Dublin at 9am
This sounds like a stand-up from the 1970s:
"An Englishman, an Irishman and a Eurocrat walk in to a negotiation..."
This must be one of those cartoons that's only funny to see those on the political Left.
Bring back Marf.
There aren't many jokes involving changing lyrics that are funny. But I had a giggle when I heard some choir boys practicing in Chichester cathedral altering 'My Heart is Inditing' to 'My Tart Is Brighton'
Ali looks by far the most composed of the English batsmen.
But that batting has led to his retention despite being (for now) utterly ineffective as England's spinner. I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
Ali looks by far the most composed of the English batsmen.
But that batting has led to his retention despite being (for now) utterly ineffective as England's spinner. I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
Yup. It’s one thing getting crushed by one of the best sides to ever play the sport, it’s another thing to get crushed by a very mediocre opponent who have had their own press on their backs about not being up to standard.
This must be one of those cartoons that's only funny to see those on the political Left.
Bring back Marf.
There aren't many jokes involving changing lyrics that are funny. But I had a giggle when I heard some choir boys practicing in Chichester cathedral altering 'My Heart is Inditing' to 'My Tart Is Brighton'
If you put a breath in the wrong place, Leonard Cohen's 'Hallelujah' contains the line 'I'll stand before the Lord of Song with nothing on.'
If Overton ends up getting the most first innings runs and wickets, was it right to select him over Mark Wood ?
Isn't Wood's fitness still doubtful ? England took a similar risk playing Moeen. It didn't come off.
Overton is a useful third seamer, who appears to have a better attitude than many in the team. That both of our opening bowlers are slower than Australia's third seamer seems to be the real problem, and there isn't an easy solution.
Ali looks by far the most composed of the English batsmen.
But that batting has led to his retention despite being (for now) utterly ineffective as England's spinner. I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
Yup. It’s one thing getting crushed by one of the best sides to ever play the sport, it’s another thing to get crushed by a very mediocre opponent who have had their own press on their backs about not being up to standard.
I think any side including Smith and Starc would be dangerous, especially at home.
Without those two I think it would be a lot more even. Indeed, without Smith Australia would surely have lost the last Test.
But that's the point - anyone can win on a counter factual. 'If the administration of English cricket was done by people who were vaguely competent, or if Giles Clarke had been eaten by a stray rhinoceros in 2003, they wouldn't have flogged the TV rights to Sky and BT and cricket would be far more popular.'
Ali looks by far the most composed of the English batsmen.
But that batting has led to his retention despite being (for now) utterly ineffective as England's spinner. I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
Yup. It’s one thing getting crushed by one of the best sides to ever play the sport, it’s another thing to get crushed by a very mediocre opponent who have had their own press on their backs about not being up to standard.
I think any side including Smith and Starc would be dangerous, especially at home.
Without those two I think it would be a lot more even. Indeed, without Smith Australia would surely have lost the last Test.
But that's the point - anyone can win on a counter factual. 'If the administration of English cricket was done by people who were vaguely competent, or if Giles Clarke had been eaten by a stray rhinoceros in 2003, they wouldn't have flogged the TV rights to Sky and BT and cricket would be far more popular.'
That's true - but I do think the absence of Stokes, which came out of the blue, right at the last moment, has unbalanced team. While not quite top class either as a batsmen or bowler, he's pretty close, and without him we were never going (for instance) to gamble on Crane instead of the partly fit Moeen, or play Wood rather than Woakes.
Ali looks by far the most composed of the English batsmen.
But that batting has led to his retention despite being (for now) utterly ineffective as England's spinner. I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
Yup. It’s one thing getting crushed by one of the best sides to ever play the sport, it’s another thing to get crushed by a very mediocre opponent who have had their own press on their backs about not being up to standard.
I think any side including Smith and Starc would be dangerous, especially at home.
Without those two I think it would be a lot more even. Indeed, without Smith Australia would surely have lost the last Test.
But that's the point - anyone can win on a counter factual. 'If the administration of English cricket was done by people who were vaguely competent, or if Giles Clarke had been eaten by a stray rhinoceros in 2003, they wouldn't have flogged the TV rights to Sky and BT and cricket would be far more popular.'
That's true - but I do think the absence of Stokes, which came out of the blue, right at the last moment, has unbalanced team. While not quite top class either as a batsmen or bowler, he's pretty close, and without him we were never going (for instance) to gamble on Crane instead of the partly fit Moeen, or play Wood rather than Woakes.
And we also lost our best fielder.
We also didn't pick the best squad, or anywhere near it.
This must be one of those cartoons that's only funny to see those on the political Left.
Bring back Marf.
There aren't many jokes involving changing lyrics that are funny. But I had a giggle when I heard some choir boys practicing in Chichester cathedral altering 'My Heart is Inditing' to 'My Tart Is Brighton'
You are quite right, it is really hard to find an appropriate rhyme for "Two Labour Sex Pest Suicides". Really, really hard.
This must be one of those cartoons that's only funny to see those on the political Left.
Bring back Marf.
There aren't many jokes involving changing lyrics that are funny. But I had a giggle when I heard some choir boys practicing in Chichester cathedral altering 'My Heart is Inditing' to 'My Tart Is Brighton'
If you put a breath in the wrong place, Leonard Cohen's 'Hallelujah' contains the line 'I'll stand before the Lord of Song with nothing on.'
To quote the old favourite ‘Gladly my Croos-Eyed bear’.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
But will Tory MPs put the Moggster through to the final ballot in order to 'widen the debate'?
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
But will Tory MPs put the Moggster through to the final ballot in order to 'widen the debate'?
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
His biggest battle is getting the MP nominations yes but there are still probably enough diehard Brexiteers on the Tory backbenches to give him a shot at doing so.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
But will Tory MPs put the Moggster through to the final ballot in order to 'widen the debate'?
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
Indeed so. JRM’s chances depend on whether the next leader is to be PM or LotO. He’s no chance of the former and every chance of the latter.
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
POINT 1 A good definition of class in 2010's South-East England looks like this:
lower working class: will never buy property, because they cannot afford it upper working class: buys property via mortgage, pays own deposit lower middle class: buys property via mortgage, relatives pay for deposit upper middle class: buys property outright, relatives pay for house upper class: will never buy property, because they will inherit
Hmm. I don't buy property because I want someone else to look after the infrastructure while I spend my money on enjoying life. I like there being lots of BTL landlords as it gives me more choice. What class is that?
Not sure but I can deduce a few things
1) You most likely live in London - it has the lowest rental yields in the country. 2) You have no pets, or small ones if any. 3) You don't particularly have tonnes of material possessions (By weight & volume)
The fundamental problem is not BTL, or second homes or any such thing - it is a huge lack of housing supply to meet demand, particularly in certain areas. Address that and you solve the problem.
Yes, I know that it is an easy problem to state but by no means easy to solve. But it has been the case since the 1970s in the UK since I became a home owner there.
It's an amazing coincidence that house prices started to rocket at exactly the same time as Tennant's rights were weakened and BTL mortgages were introduced.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
My MP was excitedly tweeting Liz 4% Kendall was the only realistic challenger to AB during the 1st week of the 2015 campaign. She was 2nd favourite at the time.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
My MP was excitedly tweeting Liz 4% Kendall was the only realistic challenger to AB during the 1st week of the 2015 campaign. She was 2nd favourite at the time.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
Having met white supremacist Steve Bannon there’s no doubt that the Moggster sees himself as the Tory Corbyn: his enemies’ enemies are his friends.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
But will Tory MPs put the Moggster through to the final ballot in order to 'widen the debate'?
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
Indeed so. JRM’s chances depend on whether the next leader is to be PM or LotO. He’s no chance of the former and every chance of the latter.
He’s also a good shout to be next Speaker.
The Speaker role has the advantage of being one that he actually wants...
POINT 1 A good definition of class in 2010's South-East England looks like this:
lower working class: will never buy property, because they cannot afford it upper working class: buys property via mortgage, pays own deposit lower middle class: buys property via mortgage, relatives pay for deposit upper middle class: buys property outright, relatives pay for house upper class: will never buy property, because they will inherit
Hmm. I don't buy property because I want someone else to look after the infrastructure while I spend my money on enjoying life. I like there being lots of BTL landlords as it gives me more choice. What class is that?
Not sure but I can deduce a few things
1) You most likely live in London - it has the lowest rental yields in the country. 2) You have no pets, or small ones if any. 3) You don't particularly have tonnes of material possessions (By weight & volume)
The fundamental problem is not BTL, or second homes or any such thing - it is a huge lack of housing supply to meet demand, particularly in certain areas. Address that and you solve the problem.
Yes, I know that it is an easy problem to state but by no means easy to solve. But it has been the case since the 1970s in the UK since I became a home owner there.
It's an amazing coincidence that house prices started to rocket at exactly the same time as Tennant's rights were weakened and BTL mortgages were introduced.
In fact, house prices crashed, shortly after rents were deregulated in 1988, although I doubt if it was cause and effect.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
Having met white supremacist Steve Bannon there’s no doubt that the Moggster sees himself as the Tory Corbyn: his enemies’ enemies are his friends.
If the choice is Corbyn or Mogg for Prime Minister, I will look to emigrate.
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
Having met white supremacist Steve Bannon there’s no doubt that the Moggster sees himself as the Tory Corbyn: his enemies’ enemies are his friends.
If the choice is Corbyn or Mogg for Prime Minister, I will look to emigrate.
And yet people will still complain that politicians are 'All the same'!
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
But will Tory MPs put the Moggster through to the final ballot in order to 'widen the debate'?
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
Indeed so. JRM’s chances depend on whether the next leader is to be PM or LotO. He’s no chance of the former and every chance of the latter.
He’s also a good shout to be next Speaker.
The Speaker role has the advantage of being one that he actually wants...
Presumably because he wants to brings back the wig, stockings and breeches?
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
I'll wait and see what's agreed, before forming a judgement on it.
POINT 1 A good definition of class in 2010's South-East England looks like this:
lower working class: will never buy property, because they cannot afford it upper working class: buys property via mortgage, pays own deposit lower middle class: buys property via mortgage, relatives pay for deposit upper middle class: buys property outright, relatives pay for house upper class: will never buy property, because they will inherit
Hmm. I don't buy property because I want someone else to look after the infrastructure while I spend my money on enjoying life. I like there being lots of BTL landlords as it gives me more choice. What class is that?
Not sure but I can deduce a few things
1) You most likely live in London - it has the lowest rental yields in the country. 2) You have no pets, or small ones if any. 3) You don't particularly have tonnes of material possessions (By weight & volume)
The fundamental problem is not BTL, or second homes or any such thing - it is a huge lack of housing supply to meet demand, particularly in certain areas. Address that and you solve the problem.
Yes, I know that it is an easy problem to state but by no means easy to solve. But it has been the case since the 1970s in the UK since I became a home owner there.
It's an amazing coincidence that house prices started to rocket at exactly the same time as Tennant's rights were weakened and BTL mortgages were introduced.
In fact, house prices crashed, shortly after rents were deregulated in 1988, although I doubt if it was cause and effect.
Indeed, I'm more focused on the introduction of the BTL mortgage which never would have come about if not for the '88 tenancy changes.
The defaulting of tenancys onto assured short in '97 I'm sure had an effect to.
I mentioned this a few days ago but was met with tumbleweed. I suppose it's the combination of a) being far in the future b) raising very fundamental questions about Britain's future as a nation and c) there being no easy solutions.
On a less disturbing but still interesting front, we are probably about 10 years away from White British births being a minority in England and Wales.
Mr Dancer, two programmes that may interest you. C4 showed their hour-long season review last night, and BBC News yesterday had an interview with Nico Rosberg about what he’s been up to this year.
I mentioned this a few days ago but was met with tumbleweed. I suppose it's the combination of a) being far in the future b) raising very fundamental questions about Britain's future as a nation and c) there being no easy solutions.
On a less disturbing but still interesting front, we are probably about 10 years away from White British births being a minority in England and Wales.
With the population still 90% white I doubt the latter is true outside of London where it is about 55% white
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
I'll wait and see what's agreed, before forming a judgement on it.
You are not going to get to see what was agreed, I suspect. The aim will be to make it almost impossible to know how much the UK has agreed to pay and, I suspect, it will be very hard to get a clear answer on what has been given up in respect of the ECJ.
The ECJ is a key issue, because it actually makes no legal sense for the UKSC to be able to refer matters to the ECJ on citizens rights. The text of the agreement will be in the A50 treaty, and there is no reason that the UKSC will need to refer this to the ECJ for clarification UNLESS what is really happening is that the UK have conceded that exiting EU laws on citizens will continue to apply after Brexit (otherwise existing EU case law is not relevant to interpreting the treaty obligations so nothing would ever get referred to them). This is not a fudging of the red line, it is a massive breach. So I suspect we will get very little detail on what has actually been agreed.
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
I doubt most people care about NI concessions or even ECJ jurisdiction on EU citizens provided free movement ends as it will under a FTA, the money is more of an issue and that is where the Tories have lost some voters to UKIP.
I mentioned this a few days ago but was met with tumbleweed. I suppose it's the combination of a) being far in the future b) raising very fundamental questions about Britain's future as a nation and c) there being no easy solutions.
On a less disturbing but still interesting front, we are probably about 10 years away from White British births being a minority in England and Wales.
17% seems like a big over-estimate to me, unless many non-Muslims convert.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
Even after the nominations closed, Corbyn was a 100/1 outsider.
Yes, if the Tory membership are in a mood for their own Corbyn they will pick Mogg whatever the pundits say. Though Mogg is already on more favourable odds than Corbyn was then.
Having met white supremacist Steve Bannon there’s no doubt that the Moggster sees himself as the Tory Corbyn: his enemies’ enemies are his friends.
Just think, the next US presidential election could be Trump v Sanders and the next UK general election could be Rees-Mogg v Corbyn!
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
No no. The abstract ideal of sovereignty was the point for Brexiters who don't live in the country and have the leisure and space to consider these things from their lofty perches. For the lumpen proletariat on the ground, stuck here, it was the foreigners.
Just 18% for the front runner! What a mess they are in.
Though even Corbyn did not get more than 50% until the leadership campaign itself was well under way.
My MP was excitedly tweeting Liz 4% Kendall was the only realistic challenger to AB during the 1st week of the 2015 campaign. She was 2nd favourite at the time.
Yes I think Remainers in the next Tory leadership race will be like Blairites in the last Labour leadership contest.
The cabinet Leavers are losing support because the Tory base want to know why they are not standing up to May over Brexit. If the Brexit 'deal' is as bad as the rumours and these guys do not resign, the Mogg will become the overwhelming favourite to be the next leader.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
Not every Brexiteer is as raging as you, Mr/Ms Archer. The vast majority of those who matter (ie Tory MPs) accept that future payments are necessary to avoid a damaging cliff edge, and we won't get what we want straight away. Even if we don't proceed to stage 2 this month, May isn't going anywhere.
Check the polls - the public are not taking this well and, in the end, that will determine whether the Tory MPs are prepared to back May. There are more than enough Leavers who will feel strongly enough to mount a challenge if the deal starts to stink with the public.
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
Tory MPs know that reopening the leadership at this moment will be viewed far more negatively by the public than any conceivable Brexit settlement. There is no way a majority of Tory MPs would vote for a contest right now, so you are mistaken.
I like how you say 'people' won't accept the sellout on the ECJ and NI. What percentage of the public knows what the ECJ is? How many are bothered whether NI is even part of the UK? Less than you would think in both cases.
Comments
I guess the Tory "hand on knees" can be laughed about while the Kaboyr cover up of alleged rapes, suicides and groping gets ignored right?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/04/brexit-labour-shortage-will-force-uk-to-import-more-fruit-winemaker
Covers one Ashes series.
Also sprach Arlene Foster
https://sluggerotoole.com/2017/12/03/foster-sets-out-the-dup-view-of-a-sensible-brexit/
Sky used to do a full day’s replay starting at 11am, then a 90-minute highlights package at 7pm which I thought was pretty much perfect for the various audiences.
Not sure if Australia would/will enforce the follow on. Their quicks are doing a lot of work.
Bye bye Kez...
"An Englishman, an Irishman and a Eurocrat walk in to a negotiation..."
Bring back Marf.
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/scottish-labours-second-chance-party-11634950
Anyone wanting a 12% return in a day or two head to Betfair
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/cricket/event/28494509/multi-market?marketIds=1.137425525
I'm not sure either of these sides have particularly solid batting lineups - it's the lack of threat in our bowling which will likely see us crushed this series.
But Labour are up one point to 28 per cent and the Tories have dropped four to 25 per cent.
Support for the SNP in the constituency vote has dropped from 46 per cent in the last Holyrood election in May 2016 to 39 per cent.
On the regional vote, the party has dropped by nine points from 42 per cent to 33 per cent.
England took a similar risk playing Moeen. It didn't come off.
Overton is a useful third seamer, who appears to have a better attitude than many in the team. That both of our opening bowlers are slower than Australia's third seamer seems to be the real problem, and there isn't an easy solution.
Without those two I think it would be a lot more even. Indeed, without Smith Australia would surely have lost the last Test.
But that's the point - anyone can win on a counter factual. 'If the administration of English cricket was done by people who were vaguely competent, or if Giles Clarke had been eaten by a stray rhinoceros in 2003, they wouldn't have flogged the TV rights to Sky and BT and cricket would be far more popular.'
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/cricket/event/28291335/market?marketId=1.134731400
And we also lost our best fielder.
Definitely no storms on the horizon.
https://weather.com/en-GB/weather/today/l/-34.93,138.60
I'm off to work. Have a good day.
Hmm. Nice line, though it does suggest that one party's dirty and the others are clean, which is not the case.
What is the case is that my post-season review has a quartet of splendid graphs. Lib Dems might be excited to learn this includes two bar charts, one of which is three-dimensional:
http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/2017-post-season-review.html
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2017/12/next-tory-leader-our-survey-rees-mogg-leads-gove-is-second-and-none-of-the-above-still-beats-the-lot.html
"There are Tories at the bottoms of our guardsmen."
Getting on the ballot is a much tougher ask with the Tory system.
They’ll make us bat again, or rattle off a quick 150 and put us back in for a few overs tonight?
He’s also a good shout to be next Speaker.
The next two weeks are going to determine who will be PM - and I can't see it being May for long unless she somehow gets something that even looks like a concession from the EU. Not looking likely.
SIR – My congratulations to Theresa May and her Government for securing a new first for Britain, and indeed, for the world.
We are to be the first and only country in history to purchase a trade deficit.
M J W Daley
London W4
http://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/
People can just about accept that money will have to be paid, but they are not going to accept the sellout on ECJ and NI. Sovereignty was the point of Brexit, and there is no way of spinning it when you hand it straight back to Brussels for no particular reason.
The defaulting of tenancys onto assured short in '97 I'm sure had an effect to.
It's official, the Ruth Davidson party is less popular than dementia and cancer.
On a less disturbing but still interesting front, we are probably about 10 years away from White British births being a minority in England and Wales.
The ECJ is a key issue, because it actually makes no legal sense for the UKSC to be able to refer matters to the ECJ on citizens rights. The text of the agreement will be in the A50 treaty, and there is no reason that the UKSC will need to refer this to the ECJ for clarification UNLESS what is really happening is that the UK have conceded that exiting EU laws on citizens will continue to apply after Brexit (otherwise existing EU case law is not relevant to interpreting the treaty obligations so nothing would ever get referred to them). This is not a fudging of the red line, it is a massive breach. So I suspect we will get very little detail on what has actually been agreed.
I like how you say 'people' won't accept the sellout on the ECJ and NI. What percentage of the public knows what the ECJ is? How many are bothered whether NI is even part of the UK? Less than you would think in both cases.