Nigel Farage has a piece in the Telegraph. The comments are all foaming at the mouth for him to get back into frontline politics because the Conservatives are 'betraying Brexit'.
We do ours manually here as we have ALOT of 'odd' EU related stuff (Selling goods but from France to Germany with them never actually touching our shores etc). This looks like a change that will affect me personally. Guess I have plenty of time to plan now - hadn't seen this publicised before...
Yep, yours is exactly the kind of business which might find this a real headache, made worse by the fact the the VAT regulations might be changing at the same time.
My guess is that they will end up delaying this yet again (it was supposed to start April 2018, and cover Corporation Tax and Income Tax as well, which would have been a complete nightmare). However, for now we have to plan on the basis that it will go ahead.
In the case of my company it's not a huge deal, but we will have to change accounting system because our current system is no longer updated and so won't be able to link to HMRC.
The London media obviously bemoaning the loss of 1,000 jobs but I genuinely think that ordinary people outside London and the bubble couldn't care less.
London has created a media and elite narrative always focussing on London as if it represents the Country.
I see. So the point has been reached where a thousand London job losses are of no interest to those outside the capital.
Remind me why London should continually lavish funds on such a surly bunch.
That is just the attitude that resulted in Brexit
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
Dyed in the wool southerner here, but I absolutely agree.
LOL. Ask any Tory what was their favourite single moment of the 2015 election night, and it is almost certainly that TPD getting his arse handed to him on a plate being unsuccessful in the defence of his seat.
I was 3000 miles away and could hear the cheering!
I'll let you into a little secret, I knew a few people running the Tory campaign in 2015.
End of April 2015, I met them in person in a bar of a very nice hotel in central London, this is what they said to me
Them: We're pulling major resources out of Rochester & Strood.
Me: Fuck, that [moderated] c**t's going to win.
Them: No, we're home and hosed, his fat arse is going to be kicked.
Me: Fucking Yes! Yes! Yes!
Then I could feel the eyes of the concierge burning on me with disgust at my language, I may have been transformed into Brian Blessed in my excitement.
I then spent the rest of the campaign worried about Tory hubris and making myself ill over it.
That's how much of an effect TPD had on me.
Mmmm, I can now see why the Tories divisions on Europe are so bitter......
It was nothing to do with Europe, honest.
I would have been similarly wound up by a Tory MP that defected to Labour or the Lib Dems (even over the EU) on the eve of the Tory conference in an attempt to destabilise the final Tory conference before the general election.
We do ours manually here as we have ALOT of 'odd' EU related stuff (Selling goods but from France to Germany with them never actually touching our shores etc). This looks like a change that will affect me personally. Guess I have plenty of time to plan now - hadn't seen this publicised before...
Yep, yours is exactly the kind of business which might find this a real headache, made worse by the fact the the VAT regulations might be changing at the same time.
My guess is that they will end up delaying this yet again (it was supposed to start April 2018, and cover Corporation Tax and Income Tax as well, which would have been a complete nightmare). However, for now we have to plan on the basis that it will go ahead.
In the case of my company it's not a huge deal, but we will have to change accounting system because our current system is no longer updated and so won't be able to link to HMRC.
Have to start using the proper VAT codes on EU stuff instead of just '0' !
"Annual spending growth of almost 6% exceeded a rise of nearly 4% in tax receipts, reflecting the slowdown in the economy’s growth rate from 0.7% in the final three months of 2016 to 0.3% in the first quarter of 2017."
‘EU member states have sought legal advice from the European Commission over a possible extension of the two-year negotiation period set out in Article 50’
The quote is from TSE's summary above.
The extension is allowed explicitly in Article 50 itself. In fact, that was the main gist of Dominic Grieve's speech during the debate last week when he opposed setting the leaving date as 29th March 2019 in the EU Withdrawal bill.
I think the legal advice being sought is how to do it. I think all 27 + 1 countries will agree to it. The UK Parliament certainly will.
Nigel Farage has a piece in the Telegraph. The comments are all foaming at the mouth for him to get back into frontline politics because the Conservatives are 'betraying Brexit'.
Eh? Betraying Brexit? They are headed as fast as their fat little legs can carry them to the national humiliation of WTO, third country status that these fools all long for.
We do ours manually here as we have ALOT of 'odd' EU related stuff (Selling goods but from France to Germany with them never actually touching our shores etc). This looks like a change that will affect me personally. Guess I have plenty of time to plan now - hadn't seen this publicised before...
Yep, yours is exactly the kind of business which might find this a real headache, made worse by the fact the the VAT regulations might be changing at the same time.
My guess is that they will end up delaying this yet again (it was supposed to start April 2018, and cover Corporation Tax and Income Tax as well, which would have been a complete nightmare). However, for now we have to plan on the basis that it will go ahead.
In the case of my company it's not a huge deal, but we will have to change accounting system because our current system is no longer updated and so won't be able to link to HMRC.
Which Accounts software lobbyist managed to get this one through ! If the VAT threshold gets lowered, this could mean huge extra costs for very small businesses - Accounting software licenses aren't cheap.
The London media obviously bemoaning the loss of 1,000 jobs but I genuinely think that ordinary people outside London and the bubble couldn't care less.
London has created a media and elite narrative always focussing on London as if it represents the Country.
I see. So the point has been reached where a thousand London job losses are of no interest to those outside the capital.
Remind me why London should continually lavish funds on such a surly bunch.
That is just the attitude that resulted in Brexit
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
Dyed in the wool southerner here, but I absolutely agree.
+1
Punishing whole areas of the country for dumb insolence and general attitude does seem a bit at odds with the ideals of liberal democracy. An unpleasant reminder that borderline-fascist snobbery is alive and well, just a bit to the left of where one used to find it.
‘EU member states have sought legal advice from the European Commission over a possible extension of the two-year negotiation period set out in Article 50’
The quote is from TSE's summary above.
The extension is allowed explicitly in Article 50 itself. In fact, that was the main gist of Dominic Grieve's speech during the debate last week when he opposed setting the leaving date as 29th March 2019 in the EU Withdrawal bill.
I think the legal advice being sought is how to do it. I think all 27 + 1 countries will agree to it. The UK Parliament certainly will.
Probably working out how it has to be announced, how the term of the extension is defined, that kind of stuff.
The London media obviously bemoaning the loss of 1,000 jobs but I genuinely think that ordinary people outside London and the bubble couldn't care less.
London has created a media and elite narrative always focussing on London as if it represents the Country.
I see. So the point has been reached where a thousand London job losses are of no interest to those outside the capital.
Remind me why London should continually lavish funds on such a surly bunch.
That is just the attitude that resulted in Brexit
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
I have no problem with people of lower income anywhere - including the North. I have problem giving subsidies to the f***ing farmers who are crying their red diesels out that they cannot afford to run their Discovery's.
The London media obviously bemoaning the loss of 1,000 jobs but I genuinely think that ordinary people outside London and the bubble couldn't care less.
London has created a media and elite narrative always focussing on London as if it represents the Country.
I see. So the point has been reached where a thousand London job losses are of no interest to those outside the capital.
Remind me why London should continually lavish funds on such a surly bunch.
That is just the attitude that resulted in Brexit
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
I have no problem with people of lower income anywhere - including the North. I have problem giving subsidies to the f***ing farmers who are crying their red diesels out that they cannot afford to run their Discovery's.
We do ours manually here as we have ALOT of 'odd' EU related stuff (Selling goods but from France to Germany with them never actually touching our shores etc). This looks like a change that will affect me personally. Guess I have plenty of time to plan now - hadn't seen this publicised before...
Yep, yours is exactly the kind of business which might find this a real headache, made worse by the fact the the VAT regulations might be changing at the same time.
My guess is that they will end up delaying this yet again (it was supposed to start April 2018, and cover Corporation Tax and Income Tax as well, which would have been a complete nightmare). However, for now we have to plan on the basis that it will go ahead.
In the case of my company it's not a huge deal, but we will have to change accounting system because our current system is no longer updated and so won't be able to link to HMRC.
Which Accounts software lobbyist managed to get this one through ! If the VAT threshold gets lowered, this could mean huge extra costs for very small businesses - Accounting software licenses aren't cheap.
On the plus side, accounting software is getting more sophisticated and real time, so the need for accountants is diminishing.
LOL. Ask any Tory what was their favourite single moment of the 2015 election night, and it is almost certainly that TPD getting his arse handed to him on a plate being unsuccessful in the defence of his seat.
I was 3000 miles away and could hear the cheering!
I'll let you into a little secret, I knew a few people running the Tory campaign in 2015.
End of April 2015, I met them in person in a bar of a very nice hotel in central London, this is what they said to me
Them: We're pulling major resources out of Rochester & Strood.
Me: Fuck, that [moderated] c**t's going to win.
Them: No, we're home and hosed, his fat arse is going to be kicked.
Me: Fucking Yes! Yes! Yes!
Then I could feel the eyes of the concierge burning on me with disgust at my language, I may have been transformed into Brian Blessed in my excitement.
I then spent the rest of the campaign worried about Tory hubris and making myself ill over it.
That's how much of an effect TPD had on me.
Mmmm, I can now see why the Tories divisions on Europe are so bitter......
It was nothing to do with Europe, honest.
I would have been similarly wound up by a Tory MP that defected to Labour or the Lib Dems (even over the EU) on the eve of the Tory conference in an attempt to destabilise the final Tory conference before the general election.
Yes, it wasn’t the defection per se, but the nature of it and the timing for maximum effect.
The equivalent of a wife standing up in the middle of a family reunion and telling her husband she wants a divorce.
"Annual spending growth of almost 6% exceeded a rise of nearly 4% in tax receipts, reflecting the slowdown in the economy’s growth rate from 0.7% in the final three months of 2016 to 0.3% in the first quarter of 2017."
Austerity?
No. Inflation has picked up and the self-employed are not paying their taxes.
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
Dyed in the wool southerner here, but I absolutely agree.
+1
Giving a "+1" to someone who is agreeing with you is a little circular!!
I'm a dyed in the wool northerner who lives in London. My parents live in Cumbria and the anti-London bilge can get rather tiresome.
Comments such as "you get free museums and the channel tunnel" are frequent, as is "I had to drive 30 miles to see the man about my hip, and there are about 20 good hospitals you Londoners can go to on your doorstep".
I find it hard to muster sympathy when I look out of the window and see one of the most beautiful national parks in the world, and consider that it took them 20 minutes to drive 30 miles, and it takes me 30 mins to get to the nearest A&E in even modest London traffic.
Nowadays I just make another G&T and talk about the weather.
Making Tax Digital for VAT is currently set to come into force (i.e. require mandatory electronic VAT accounting and submission) three days after Brexit day. Have you thought this through?
Who on earth does it by paper these days ?
I assume this post has been prompted by the fact it is the 21st so EC Sales are due
Making Tax Digital for VAT is currently set to come into force (i.e. require mandatory electronic VAT accounting and submission) three days after Brexit day. Have you thought this through?
Someone I know recently described Philip Hammond as the David Moyes of politics. He wasn't wrong.
"Annual spending growth of almost 6% exceeded a rise of nearly 4% in tax receipts, reflecting the slowdown in the economy’s growth rate from 0.7% in the final three months of 2016 to 0.3% in the first quarter of 2017."
Austerity?
No. Inflation has picked up and the self-employed are not paying their taxes.
The London media obviously bemoaning the loss of 1,000 jobs but I genuinely think that ordinary people outside London and the bubble couldn't care less.
London has created a media and elite narrative always focussing on London as if it represents the Country.
I see. So the point has been reached where a thousand London job losses are of no interest to those outside the capital.
Remind me why London should continually lavish funds on such a surly bunch.
That is just the attitude that resulted in Brexit
And that's just the attitude that will result in London demanding far more control of the money that it earns, rather than waste it on people who hate it.
With respect, that is just so divisive it is to be ignored.
The North already see that attitude but it is rare to see it expressed so openly
You apparently relish job losses for London but want its money. And you describe my attitude as divisive?
I do not relish any job losses anywhere. Because I convey an opinion expressed through the media does not mean I endorse it but I can understand why people in the North have this anger towards London
Such people in "the North" seem to want to sponge off people they despise. But you seem to think it unreasonable that the people they despise might want to do something about that if they persist in that attitude.
No the North and other regions want their fair share of investment - to suggest Northern people sponge off people they despise is so absurd it is not worth commenting on further
I have no problem with people of lower income anywhere - including the North. I have problem giving subsidies to the f***ing farmers who are crying their red diesels out that they cannot afford to run their Discovery's.
That's what you call spongers.
Farmers are on average lower-income people, that is not the plural of Discovery which is a vehicle very few farmers drive, red diesel is used for agricultural not transport purposes (and far too heavily policed by hmrc to be worth bending the rules), and I doubt you see a lot of farmers round Surbiton way. Is it just kulaks, or are there other large groups you know nothing about and irrationally hate? You really should see someone.
You've got to laugh at the Guardian's coverage of government borrowing.
It's all bad news... until you get to the bit that says "The lower levels of borrowing mean the chancellor is likely to undershoot the OBR’s March forecast for £58.3bn of borrowing during the financial year ending March 2018."
You've got to laugh at the Guardian's coverage of government borrowing.
It's all bad news... until you get to the bit that says "The lower levels of borrowing mean the chancellor is likely to undershoot the OBR’s March forecast for £58.3bn of borrowing during the financial year ending March 2018."
As in... it's actually good news...
If we ever get PM jezza the guardian won’t have to worry about how to spin that kind of news anymore....
Making Tax Digital for VAT is currently set to come into force (i.e. require mandatory electronic VAT accounting and submission) three days after Brexit day. Have you thought this through?
Who on earth does it by paper these days ?
I assume this post has been prompted by the fact it is the 21st so EC Sales are due
No-one does it by paper, but that's not the point. Currently 87% of returns are done by people using the government gateway to type in the small number of figures required for a VAT return. On 1st April 2019 that will no longer be allowed, you have to be running an HMRC-approved electronic accounting system with direct links to HMRC.
It's a fairly big change for lots of small businesses, and also for some large businesses:
Ordinarily this would be a significant but manageable transition, but I can't help feeling that both businesses and HMRC will have lots of other fires to put out just at that time.
I hope we take the Italian approach - no-one does anything to prepare for it, then HMRC relent and allow the Govt gateway approach to continue. It makes no sense to change a system that works, is free and is a huge improvement on the paper submissions, for one which introduces an intermediate system, a cost, and almost certainly software incompatibilities.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
Apple's main supplier in Asia has been employing high-school students working illegal overtime to assemble the iPhone X in an effort to catch up with demand after facing production delays, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday,
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
Apple's main supplier in Asia has been employing high-school students working illegal overtime to assemble the iPhone X in an effort to catch up with demand after facing production delays, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday,
Virtually every business oriented media outfit has reported it today.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Making Tax Digital for VAT is currently set to come into force (i.e. require mandatory electronic VAT accounting and submission) three days after Brexit day. Have you thought this through?
Who on earth does it by paper these days ?
I assume this post has been prompted by the fact it is the 21st so EC Sales are due
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
No they won't. Only Samsung and Sony are the major brands sticking to the 3.5mm jack, the rest are abandoning it.
What is the justification for doing it? Seems utterly pointless to me. It is putting me off upgrading my 6s.
To try and make people buy the expensive Airpods and generally lock people further into their ecosystem. If you want to get a new phone then I'd seriously recommend the S8 or waiting for the new Xperia thats coming in April/May which is going to have a bezel minimising design and keep the 3.5mm jack. One advantage of the Xperia is that the fingerprint scanner is in the power button so the phone can be unlocked without having to pick it up from a desk. I find that really useful as my work iPhone does that as well, but my colleague's S8 doesn't (scanner on the back).
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
So much for due process. There is no way that there was sufficient time for an investigation and then disciplinary hearing to take place.
No doubt they will have cleared it through their legal departments - but it should take more than allegations for anyone to lose their job. There has to be a proper process - no matter who the person is. Just because you are in the public eye doesn't mean that you are not subject to the same laws as everyone else - and that works both ways.
I have the XZ Premium, it's water resistant to the same level and it has a headphone jack. If that was a problem then the lightning port would pose the same issue.
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
Stephen Colbert won’t be writing a pile of jokes about that one!
Only if he uses it as the segway to 10 trump jokes.
Ha, maybe. Another US story that seems to have passed most people by is the DOJ investigation of the AT&T/TimeWarner merger. Which has nothing at all to do with grandstanding politicians wanting to grill TW execs about harassment and casting couch culture, and certainly, absolutely, definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with the president’s lack of love for TW-owned CNN.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
Stephen Colbert won’t be writing a pile of jokes about that one!
Only if he uses it as the segway to 10 trump jokes.
Ha, maybe. Another US story that seems to have passed most people by is the DOJ investigation of the AT&T/TimeWarner merger. Which has nothing at all to do with grandstanding politicians wanting to grill TW execs about harassment and casting couch culture, and certainly, absolutely, definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with the president’s lack of love for TW-owned CNN.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Wake me up when we have fusion powered headphones.
I have the XZ Premium, it's water resistant to the same level and it has a headphone jack. If that was a problem then the lightning port would pose the same issue.
I have the XZ too. Waterproofing was the story, but I wasn't convinced either.
Great sound quality, but battery flattens a bit quickly, and keyboard is a bit annoying after my Samsung.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Wireless charging is good innovation for all of that. My colleague has a wireless charger for his S8 that also works for his watch and headphones. He just puts them all on the same charging plate and it works fine.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
I have the XZ Premium, it's water resistant to the same level and it has a headphone jack. If that was a problem then the lightning port would pose the same issue.
I have the XZ too. Waterproofing was the story, but I wasn't convinced either.
Great sound quality, but battery flattens a bit quickly, and keyboard is a bit annoying after my Samsung.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
still on my first charge after about eight years for my wired headphones
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Wireless charging is good innovation for all of that. My colleague has a wireless charger for his S8 that also works for his watch and headphones. He just puts them all on the same charging plate and it works fine.
Yeh, the wireless charging might be enough to make me switch. Problem is all my business machines are Macs.
I have the XZ Premium, it's water resistant to the same level and it has a headphone jack. If that was a problem then the lightning port would pose the same issue.
I have the XZ too. Waterproofing was the story, but I wasn't convinced either.
Great sound quality, but battery flattens a bit quickly, and keyboard is a bit annoying after my Samsung.
Never going back to iphone.
I went from the XZ to the XZ Premium, work had a buyback scheme which allowed me to change for less than 100 francs so I went for it. Haven't looked back. The best improvement is the battery life, even more than the screen. I used to end the day on 10-15% with the XZ, with the Premium it's still on 40% when I get to the end of day and I'm a fairly heavy user.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
still on my first charge after about eight years for my wired headphones
I can’t live without active noise cancelling so I am going to have a chargeable set come what may, the Bluetooth wireless functionality is nice but not as important as blocking noise.
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
So much for due process. There is no way that there was sufficient time for an investigation and then disciplinary hearing to take place.
No doubt they will have cleared it through their legal departments - but it should take more than allegations for anyone to lose their job. There has to be a proper process - no matter who the person is. Just because you are in the public eye doesn't mean that you are not subject to the same laws as everyone else - and that works both ways.
He had admitted there was substance to the allegations:
We don't know exactly what he had admitted to, but it may well be that critical allegations were unchallenged and, indeed, he may have agreed to go in the circumstances.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
still on my first charge after about eight years for my wired headphones
I can’t live without active noise cancelling so I am going to have a chargeable set come what may, the Bluetooth wireless functionality is nice but not as important as blocking noise.
I have the in-ear buds which passively block out all external stimuli. A life-saver in my open plan office.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Wireless charging is good innovation for all of that. My colleague has a wireless charger for his S8 that also works for his watch and headphones. He just puts them all on the same charging plate and it works fine.
Yeh, the wireless charging might be enough to make me switch. Problem is all my business machines are Macs.
Android has played nicely with Macs for ages, I have an iPad Pro, iPhone 7, Sony XZ Premium, a Mac and a PC. All of them play nicely together except the iPhone 7 which loathes connecting to anything.
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
Stephen Colbert won’t be writing a pile of jokes about that one!
Only if he uses it as the segway to 10 trump jokes.
Ha, maybe. Another US story that seems to have passed most people by is the DOJ investigation of the AT&T/TimeWarner merger. Which has nothing at all to do with grandstanding politicians wanting to grill TW execs about harassment and casting couch culture, and certainly, absolutely, definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with the president’s lack of love for TW-owned CNN.
Total coincidence!
Time Warner is one of the largest cable TV and internet companies in the US. AT&T is the largest satellite Pay TV broadcaster in the US, (it owns DirecTV), and one of the largest internet companies in the US. 4 out of 5 households here pay for cable/satellite. There is ample room for monopolistic concern.
The CNN thing seems odd though, on the face of it. It may have poor ratings these days, but it is a cash cow of epic proportions. Maybe having a dominant cable/satellite supplier own one of the major news organisations it supplies tips the balance.
Let’s not get started on the new MacBook dongle hell, no MagSafe, and no escape key.
Are they actively making decisions to put me off staying with them??
It does seem that way, but Apple know their market well enough. I think iPhone 8 sales are going to be pants but loads of Apple people are extremely happy with their £1100 X. A friend got one on a £75/m contract for two years, madness.
Apples motto should be “there’s a (proprietary) dongle for that”.
I notice that amazon have followed suit with their new fire stick and tv. Removed ports for no good reason and then charge for a dongle to put them back.
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
The adaptor goes into the lightning port, presumably? I tend to charge my phone and listen to wired headphones at the same time.
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
Maybe not. This reminds me of the first pc that came out with no floppy drive. It soon became the norm. Now that basic bluetooth earbuds are about $20 the change may stick.
Meh. I like the jack. I can’t be bothered to charge up yet another device.
Until they've cracked a battery that lasts as long as the MacBook Air I'm typing on (constant use for 9 hours and still on 33%), they should leave sensible technology like headphones that don't need charging be.
Premium Bluetooth headphone like the Sony mdr-1000 last 24hrs of constant use on a single charge.
still on my first charge after about eight years for my wired headphones
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
Apples motto should be “there’s a (proprietary) dongle for that”.
If you want to use fast charging on the new iPhone you have to buy a separate charger for £50 *and* a separate cable for £25.
Wait, the charger doesn't come with the correct cable? That's mad. I thought it was ridiculous that the fast charger didn't come with the £1100 phone, but that really takes the biscuit.
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
Apples motto should be “there’s a (proprietary) dongle for that”.
If you want to use fast charging on the new iPhone you have to buy a separate charger for £50 *and* a separate cable for £25.
Wait, the charger doesn't come with the correct cable? That's mad. I thought it was ridiculous that the fast charger didn't come with the £1100 phone, but that really takes the biscuit.
US TV host Charlie Rose has been fired by CBS News following sexual harassment allegations.
Stephen Colbert won’t be writing a pile of jokes about that one!
Only if he uses it as the segway to 10 trump jokes.
Ha, maybe. Another US story that seems to have passed most people by is the DOJ investigation of the AT&T/TimeWarner merger. Which has nothing at all to do with grandstanding politicians wanting to grill TW execs about harassment and casting couch culture, and certainly, absolutely, definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with the president’s lack of love for TW-owned CNN.
Total coincidence!
Time Warner is one of the largest cable TV and internet companies in the US. AT&T is the largest satellite Pay TV broadcaster in the US, (it owns DirecTV), and one of the largest internet companies in the US. 4 out of 5 households here pay for cable/satellite. There is ample room for monopolistic concern.
The CNN thing seems odd though, on the face of it. It may have poor ratings these days, but it is a cash cow of epic proportions. Maybe having a dominant cable/satellite supplier own one of the major news organisations it supplies tips the balance.
TW that’s left are purely content producers, AT&T are platform and infrastructure owners, so it’s very much a vertical acquisition and not quite as bad as might first have been thought. Still no good for consumers though.
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
I'm currently putting the finishing touches on a thread that discusses both a new Scottish Independence referendum and AV.
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
I'm currently putting the finishing touches on a thread that discusses both a new Scottish Independence referendum and AV.
You know what makes a perfect evening? A nice pineapple pizza and a good AV thread.
I for one would rather be having a bitter and vengeful argument about Brexit than enduring endless conversations about here-today-gone-tomorrow technology that none of us need.
I'm currently putting the finishing touches on a thread that discusses both a new Scottish Independence referendum and AV.
You know what makes a perfect evening? A nice pineapple pizza and a good AV thread.
This one is for the weekend.
The threads over the next few days are going to be dominated by the budget.
Nigel Farage has a piece in the Telegraph. The comments are all foaming at the mouth for him to get back into frontline politics because the Conservatives are 'betraying Brexit'.
Comments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/21/inch-inch-conservatives-surrendering-every-one-brexit-red-lines/
My guess is that they will end up delaying this yet again (it was supposed to start April 2018, and cover Corporation Tax and Income Tax as well, which would have been a complete nightmare). However, for now we have to plan on the basis that it will go ahead.
In the case of my company it's not a huge deal, but we will have to change accounting system because our current system is no longer updated and so won't be able to link to HMRC.
I would have been similarly wound up by a Tory MP that defected to Labour or the Lib Dems (even over the EU) on the eve of the Tory conference in an attempt to destabilise the final Tory conference before the general election.
Austerity?
The quote is from TSE's summary above.
The extension is allowed explicitly in Article 50 itself. In fact, that was the main gist of Dominic Grieve's speech during the debate last week when he opposed setting the leaving date as 29th March 2019 in the EU Withdrawal bill.
I think the legal advice being sought is how to do it. I think all 27 + 1 countries will agree to it. The UK Parliament certainly will.
If the VAT threshold gets lowered, this could mean huge extra costs for very small businesses - Accounting software licenses aren't cheap.
That's what you call spongers.
The equivalent of a wife standing up in the middle of a family reunion and telling her husband she wants a divorce.
I'm a dyed in the wool northerner who lives in London. My parents live in Cumbria and the anti-London bilge can get rather tiresome.
Comments such as "you get free museums and the channel tunnel" are frequent, as is "I had to drive 30 miles to see the man about my hip, and there are about 20 good hospitals you Londoners can go to on your doorstep".
I find it hard to muster sympathy when I look out of the window and see one of the most beautiful national parks in the world, and consider that it took them 20 minutes to drive 30 miles, and it takes me 30 mins to get to the nearest A&E in even modest London traffic.
Nowadays I just make another G&T and talk about the weather.
It's all bad news... until you get to the bit that says "The lower levels of borrowing mean the chancellor is likely to undershoot the OBR’s March forecast for £58.3bn of borrowing during the financial year ending March 2018."
As in... it's actually good news...
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/932982642257129472
Face ID is the dog's dangly bits.
https://youtu.be/rdFXddVsUuQ
Mind you I didn't get the hate for the lack of 3.5mm jack.
1) I use wireless headphones beforehand
2) They provide you with a free adaptor so you can use your old 3.5mm jack headphones
It is an entirely unnecessary change. And, I suspect, one they'll go back on eventually.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/brexit-is-already-costing-you-hundreds-more-every-year-experts-say_uk_5a1184bde4b045cf43720417
This is the best video of earphone testing ever:
https://youtu.be/tMirx_bwmWk
https://youtu.be/R59TevgzN3k
No doubt they will have cleared it through their legal departments - but it should take more than allegations for anyone to lose their job. There has to be a proper process - no matter who the person is. Just because you are in the public eye doesn't mean that you are not subject to the same laws as everyone else - and that works both ways.
Great sound quality, but battery flattens a bit quickly, and keyboard is a bit annoying after my Samsung.
Never going back to iphone.
https://twitter.com/charlierose/status/932747035069034496
We don't know exactly what he had admitted to, but it may well be that critical allegations were unchallenged and, indeed, he may have agreed to go in the circumstances.
http://tinyurl.com/HurrahForApple
The CNN thing seems odd though, on the face of it. It may have poor ratings these days, but it is a cash cow of epic proportions. Maybe having a dominant cable/satellite supplier own one of the major news organisations it supplies tips the balance.
Non-criminal family cases, too.
This is Randox's response;
http://www.randox.com/rts-whistleblower/
First thing that MaxPB and I have ever agreed on
Happy Holidays!
TW that’s left are purely content producers, AT&T are platform and infrastructure owners, so it’s very much a vertical acquisition and not quite as bad as might first have been thought. Still no good for consumers though.
The threads over the next few days are going to be dominated by the budget.
'Nigel Farage would 'pick up a rifle' if Brexit is not delivered'
http://tinyurl.com/ybc5ul2m