Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Leadsom, Williamson and Tugendhat move into the frame in the T

1246

Comments

  • Options
    Firstly the Sunday Times piece is deliberately vague. From their wording the porn was on a computer in his Commons Office. It doesn't say it was his. Secondly their is a subsequent hypocrisy angle as the government has since tried to ban ' extreme ' porn. Indeed automatic age verification comes in next year.
    Perhaps the most important part of the article is the naming of another Tory MP, Dan Poulter, who was also named on the spreadsheet.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    Rhubarb said:

    Scott_P said:
    It may not even been his parliamentary laptop - it's entirely possible it was a personal one he had with him that was grabbed during the raid.
    The article says it was a parliamentary PC.

    Though on reflection proving it was Green that downloaded it may well be impossible at 9 years' distance. So maybe he can survive.
  • Options
    stevefstevef Posts: 1,044
    This country is descending into sexual McCarthyism. There will come a moment when it will go so far that it will suddenly stop but at the moment we are witnessing a witch hunt.
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    AndyJS said:

    edit

    I misread that and thought it referred to TM

    If true Green needs to go as I have been saying all week
    On what basis? Green wasn't charged at the time and the Police are rarely backwards in coming forwards when it comes to bringing charges for illegal porn.

    So you are saying he should be sacked for having something legal...

    If the images were illegal at the time - why wasn't he charged?

    He is already subject to an allegation and this latest revelation must to be too uncomfortable for TM and his resignation would be the right thing to do

    Burn the w*tch.

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited November 2017
    So...so far this evening the killer stories are...

    Minister denies kinky porn was found on his computer.
    MP asks researcher to go for a coffee with a friend.
    Man goes back to flat of a government whip, whip thinks he has got lucky, man says no, nothing happens.
    Fallon makes a pass at a journalist friend after boozy lunch, she says no.

    I bet every single person can tell similar stories of people at work.

    However, there are still outstanding claims of unnamed rapists at party conferences etc.
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:
    Is there a red blooded male in the country, nay, the world, without some "porn on his computer"?

    It's like saying "we investigated the deputy prime minister and found a penis between his legs"
    I bet if you investigated the internet history of 90% of Sunday Times journalists you would also find porn there somewhere.

    "Extreme" is the important word here, I think.
    Isn't porn described as 'extreme' as often and as inaccurately as English footballers are described as 'world class' ?
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    AndyJS said:

    edit

    I misread that and thought it referred to TM

    If true Green needs to go as I have been saying all week
    On what basis? Green wasn't charged at the time and the Police are rarely backwards in coming forwards when it comes to bringing charges for illegal porn.

    So you are saying he should be sacked for having something legal...

    If the images were illegal at the time - why wasn't he charged?

    He is already subject to an allegation and this latest revelation must to be too uncomfortable for TM and his resignation would be the right thing to do
    You really don't believe in due process do you?
    Of course but in this case he is DPM and TM is compromised as long as he is in office
    He has ,however, already instructed lawyers in respect of the initial allegations made.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,990

    AndyJS said:

    edit

    I misread that and thought it referred to TM

    If true Green needs to go as I have been saying all week
    On what basis? Green wasn't charged at the time and the Police are rarely backwards in coming forwards when it comes to bringing charges for illegal porn.

    So you are saying he should be sacked for having something legal...

    If the images were illegal at the time - why wasn't he charged?

    He is already subject to an allegation and this latest revelation must to be too uncomfortable for TM and his resignation would be the right thing to do
    You really don't believe in due process do you?
    Of course but in this case he is DPM and TM is compromised as long as he is in office
    The DPM does not have to take a vow of chastity.
  • Options

    Firstly the Sunday Times piece is deliberately vague. From their wording the porn was on a computer in his Commons Office. It doesn't say it was his. Secondly their is a subsequent hypocrisy angle as the government has since tried to ban ' extreme ' porn. Indeed automatic age verification comes in next year.
    Perhaps the most important part of the article is the naming of another Tory MP, Dan Poulter, who was also named on the spreadsheet.

    Yes, I'd forgotten about that.
  • Options
    Bob Quick as a fucking twat - That's what a then Senior Tory told me several years ago, and one of the people why the Tories aren't as pro police as they used to be.

    He's always had a beef with the Tories ever since the Green arrest, this might explain why Bob Quick as grinding his axe tonight.

    From a few days after the arrest

    Green inquiry officer apologises for Tory slur. Bob Quick issues unreserved apology for allegation party planted a newspaper story he said endangered his family

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/dec/22/bob-quick-david-cameron-row
  • Options

    AndyJS said:

    edit

    I misread that and thought it referred to TM

    If true Green needs to go as I have been saying all week
    On what basis? Green wasn't charged at the time and the Police are rarely backwards in coming forwards when it comes to bringing charges for illegal porn.

    So you are saying he should be sacked for having something legal...

    If the images were illegal at the time - why wasn't he charged?

    He is already subject to an allegation and this latest revelation must to be too uncomfortable for TM and his resignation would be the right thing to do
    You really don't believe in due process do you?
    Of course but in this case he is DPM and TM is compromised as long as he is in office
    So as far as you are concerned anyone in a senior position should stand down if allegations, no matter how baseless, are made about them. Green is only compromised if there is any evidence against him. He has vehemently denied all the allegations against him but you insist he should go now. That's not justice.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited November 2017
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:
    Is there a red blooded male in the country, nay, the world, without some "porn on his computer"?

    It's like saying "we investigated the deputy prime minister and found a penis between his legs"
    I have to say that unless it was a computer provided by the government , this is no business of anyone else. Of course, if children are involved that's a different story. Animals ?

    Clearly this is extremely embarrassing for him and his family. Totally unnecessary.
  • Options
    Jane Merrick now reveals it was Fallon who kissed her 14 years ago and she reported it to no 10 last Wednesday.

    So nothing to do with Leadsom
  • Options
    Scott_P said:
    Its like Tim Shipman is reading this thread...
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    You missed out "...on a government PC."

    If I downloaded (even legal) porn on my employer's IT equipment, I'd be fired for gorss misconduct, as would most employees in this country.

    Standards, dear boy.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170
    edited November 2017
    stevef said:

    This country is descending into sexual McCarthyism. There will come a moment when it will go so far that it will suddenly stop but at the moment we are witnessing a witch hunt.

    Either we get rid of every MP who has ever had an affair, been a bit too touchy feely with an aide or watched porn (which probably means 2/3 of the Commons gone) or we accept that MPs have foibles as much as the rest of us and just focus on those who genuinely did something illegal.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:
    Its like Tim Shipman is reading this thread...
    He probably is
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    You missed out "...on a government PC." If I did that on my employer's IT equipment, I'd be fored for gorss misconduct, as would most employees in this country.

    Standards, dear boy.
    Err, it wasn't a government computer.
  • Options
    Looks like Poulter is the second Blue on Blue incident of the evening with one Tory MP dobbing in another.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    Scott_P said:

    It's almost like Tim Shipman is reading this thread and posting answers to the questions as they arise...

    What self-respecting politico wouldn't be reading this thread? :D
  • Options

    So...so far this evening the killer stories are...

    Minister watches some kinky porn.
    MP asks researcher to go for a coffee with a friend.
    Man goes back to flat of a whip, whip thinks he has got lucky, nothing happens.
    Fallon makes a pass at a journalist friend after boozy lunch, she says no.

    I bet every single person can tell similar stories of people at work.

    Is the first one related to the C4 story? If so, that's a simplification. Apparently, the researcher was asked repeatedly by intermediaries, and the MP allegedly eventually came in and asked her after the repeated requests by intermediaries. That doesn't sound like your average story, that sounds like harassment. How many people do you really think pressure someone to go out with their friend multiple times, even after they've said no? Apparently, it was related to a deal, and the friend in question was significantly older.

    The Jane Merrick one is Fallon apparently lunging at her, hardly someone just making a pass. I don't know anyone whose lunged at someone.
  • Options
    anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,578
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited November 2017
    If this is the level of killer stories the papers have, all these claims of 12 MPs having to step down look massively overblown. Before two weeks ago, MP has porn on his pc didn't warrant more than one post on Guido.
  • Options

    AndyJS said:

    edit

    I misread that and thought it referred to TM

    If true Green needs to go as I have been saying all week
    On what basis? Green wasn't charged at the time and the Police are rarely backwards in coming forwards when it comes to bringing charges for illegal porn.

    So you are saying he should be sacked for having something legal...

    If the images were illegal at the time - why wasn't he charged?

    He is already subject to an allegation and this latest revelation must to be too uncomfortable for TM and his resignation would be the right thing to do
    You really don't believe in due process do you?
    Of course but in this case he is DPM and TM is compromised as long as he is in office
    So as far as you are concerned anyone in a senior position should stand down if allegations, no matter how baseless, are made about them. Green is only compromised if there is any evidence against him. He has vehemently denied all the allegations against him but you insist he should go now. That's not justice.
    Not at all. Damien Green is compromised and must be given time to defend himself away from the cabinet
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited November 2017

    Jane Merrick now reveals it was Fallon who kissed her 14 years ago and she reported it to no 10 last Wednesday.

    So nothing to do with Leadsom

    And, I thought Fallon was so boring... Then again, who knew what Major was up to ?
  • Options
    welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,460
    marke09 said:

    welshowl said:



    I believe Conservative Clubs in places like Horwich are often little more than standard WMCs.

    I was astonished when I visited Ebbw Vale recently to find -- amongst the tanning parlours, pound-shops and pawn brokers that otherwise made up the High Street -- a gleaming and well maintained Conservative Club.

    It was the most prosperous looking building on the High Street (though that sadly isn’t saying much).

    The Tory vote in the whole of the Blaenau Gwent constituency is absolutely derisory. Given that Ebbw Vale is one of the most deprived parts of the already very deprived Blaenau Gwent, I just can’t believe that the Ebbw Vale Conservative Club survives on the subscriptions of paid-up members of the Conservative party.

    There were youths in the club playing snooker when I passed by.
    I think oddity of the many “Con clubs”, in the deepest valleys went back to the pre 1961 Sunday drinking laws in Wales where the pubs were shut but clubs were open to members and guests ( and membership was often purchasable on the door for a nominal sum). Often the division, I believe, in society was “chapel” or “Con club”. Why the “Con” bit though as opposed to others I don’t know. Nevertheless they live on.

    Incidentally there was a vote forced on closing the pubs in Cardiff as late as about 1989ish. The council decided to save money and didn’t publicise it (!). The brewers alerted folk to the vote by advertising the fact on beer mats.

    Never have I arrived at a polling station so early to cast my vote (!)
    ny first vote was on opening /closing the pubs on a Sunday 1982 -i voted open as evey 18yr old did
    The 1961 repeal legislation ( of the 1881 Act ) allowed for subsequent referendums to be called every 7 years ( from memory) if 500 electors called for it. Getting 500 “dry fanatics” in a place the size of Cardiff (200k voters?) was easy, and so they tried to sneak it through under the radar unwittingly abetted by the council trying to save a few quid. I recall turnout was tiny ( under 10k) but the beer mats had got the message out to enough folk!
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    From TSE's comment it sounds as though it wasn't a government machine.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    Jane Merrick now reveals it was Fallon who kissed her 14 years ago and she reported it to no 10 last Wednesday.

    So nothing to do with Leadsom

    Surely there have to have been witnesses for incidents like that to register at all? How can she prove it 14 years later?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
  • Options
    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    You missed out "...on a government PC." If I did that on my employer's IT equipment, I'd be fored for gorss misconduct, as would most employees in this country.

    Standards, dear boy.
    Err, it wasn't a government computer.
    Article says " a parliamentary PC".
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,021
    HYUFD said:

    stevef said:

    This country is descending into sexual McCarthyism. There will come a moment when it will go so far that it will suddenly stop but at the moment we are witnessing a witch hunt.

    Either we get rid of every MP who has ever had an affair, been a bit too touchy feely with an aide or watched porn (which probably means 2/3 of the Commons gone) or we accept that MPs have foibles as much as the rest of us and just focus on those who genuinely did something illegal.
    Indeed, I agree. However, a proper Code of Conduct for behaviour, with sanctions taken out of the hands of Whips, and placed in a truly independent HR body, would probably greatly help everyone in the HofC. MP's and staffers alike.
    Plenty of ordinary employees are expected to abide by standards higher than "not illegal."
    Like a normal workplace.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    On a government computer.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    The only people who employ MPs are their constituents, they are the only people who can dismiss them bar an offence leading to imprisonment of more than a year.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited November 2017
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Given the current climate, we are far more interested what extreme porn you have on your pc...

    Joking aside...Congrats.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    You missed out "...on a government PC."

    If I downloaded (even legal) porn on my employer's IT equipment, I'd be fired for gorss misconduct, as would most employees in this country.

    Standards, dear boy.
    As TSE has confirmed it was not even a government PC.
  • Options
    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017
    dixiedean said:

    HYUFD said:

    stevef said:

    This country is descending into sexual McCarthyism. There will come a moment when it will go so far that it will suddenly stop but at the moment we are witnessing a witch hunt.

    Either we get rid of every MP who has ever had an affair, been a bit too touchy feely with an aide or watched porn (which probably means 2/3 of the Commons gone) or we accept that MPs have foibles as much as the rest of us and just focus on those who genuinely did something illegal.
    Indeed, I agree. However, a proper Code of Conduct for behaviour, with sanctions taken out of the hands of Whips, and placed in a truly independent HR body, would probably greatly help everyone in the HofC. MP's and staffers alike.
    Plenty of ordinary employees are expected to abide by standards higher than "not illegal."
    Like a normal workplace.
    +1
    For example, viewing or downloading porn on an office PC is pretty much a universal no-no in the real world.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Lovely story and all the best to both of you. I am entering my 55th year with my beloved wife.

    Love endures
  • Options
    RobD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    From TSE's comment it sounds as though it wasn't a government machine.
    It can't have been a government computer as the Tories weren't in government in 2008.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170
    surbiton said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    On a government computer.
    Wrong
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Hurrah.
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.


    Email each other?

    I suppose if she's not in the same bed, then she doesn't snore in your ear and wake you up.

    Grrrrrr.

  • Options
    The Big Picture is Blue on Blue. It's 3 of the right wing Sunday's breaking new allegations from Tory sources about other Tories. The Channel 4 piece was also Blue on Blue. This is turning into a story about Conservative cohesion. Tories are using the febrile atmosphere to make what would normally be thin gruel into poison about other Tories.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
    You did the right thing. You think that's what happened to Green?
  • Options
    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    SeanT said:

    AndyJS said:
    Extreme could be anything tho:

    Bondage, spanking and gimp masks? Meh, no one cares

    Nazi-themed gay orgies? Ouch and tricky

    Animals or Kids? Prison
    Surely if it was illegal stuff he would have been done by the plod? I mean at the time they were gunning for him anyway.
    And why is he commenting on something legal (I assume) found during a police search? I think that is utterly inappropriate
  • Options
    https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/status/926932032831279105

    So it looks like it wasn't a personal pc then, but a work pc.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,292
    edited November 2017

    The Big Picture is Blue on Blue. It's 3 of the right wing Sunday's breaking new allegations from Tory sources about other Tories. The Channel 4 piece was also Blue on Blue. This is turning into a story about Conservative cohesion. Tories are using the febrile atmosphere to make what would normally be thin gruel into poison about other Tories.

    It is interesting. Tories are going on the record and naming names (definitely score settling going on). Labour are going on the record and making far worse claims and saying I couldn't possibly give you a name.

    Reminds we of the GE campaign, where Labour were incredibly disciplined.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    Too busy leaking stories about Tories to the press.
  • Options

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    That, is a very good question indeed.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    An allegation of rape concerning a Labour official can get in line behind the vital work the Police are doing investigating a Tory watching legal porn
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
    You did the right thing. You think that's what happened to Green?
    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.
  • Options

    The Big Picture is Blue on Blue. It's 3 of the right wing Sunday's breaking new allegations from Tory sources about other Tories. The Channel 4 piece was also Blue on Blue. This is turning into a story about Conservative cohesion. Tories are using the febrile atmosphere to make what would normally be thin gruel into poison about other Tories.

    Bit parochial - all parties are involved and no one comes out of this with a political advantage
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
    You did the right thing. You think that's what happened to Green?
    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.
    https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/status/926932637545127936

  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    An allegation of rape concerning a Labour official can get in line behind the vital work the Police are doing investigating a Tory watching legal porn
    Yes, silly me. Not to mention investigating long dead Tories. I assume the Police have not got sufficient resources to investigate Bex Bailey's claim.
  • Options
    franklynfranklyn Posts: 297
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Good to know that Sean T, a professional writer of fiction of some acclaim, if still turning out fiction from his lonely bed-sit in Neasden. In a changing world, some things never change.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,369
    That's great, Sean - many happy years of it.

    On the Green story - a question is the source. Green seems to feel it was the former senior police officer and is embarking on wrestling with him in public, which looks as though it will decide the matter swiftly. The matter is presumably a matter of record and it should be possible for the police to confirm or deny it based on their records. How extreme and how it got there, if it did, may be fuzzier.

    But I rather agree that the Sundays don't have very much news on the harassment front, so maybe the storm is passing?
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.

    https://twitter.com/shippersunbound/status/926934547547197440
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,021
    edited November 2017
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Good for you! Hearty congratulations! Well played, Sir! And her!
  • Options
    This is not good for Mrs May nor Gavin Williamson

    Theresa May is under pressure to disclose what two of her closest allies knew about allegations made against senior Conservatives, amid claims they “sat on” accusations about MPs’ conduct.

    The Telegraph understands that concerns about the behaviour of Sir Michael Fallon, the former defence secretary, were raised repeatedly in the whips’ office when Gavin Barwell, who is now the Prime Minister’s chief of staff, was “number three” there.

    Separately, a serious allegation about the Tory MP Charlie Elphicke, then a whip himself, was made to the office in the same period, before Gavin Williamson – whom the Prime Minister appointed on Thursday as Sir Michael’s successor – became chief whip.


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/04/theresa-mays-chief-staff-new-defence-secretary-sat-claims-westminster/
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    But have you managed to explain what the interest rate rise was all about ?
  • Options

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
    Er wrong again, the government doesn't supply computers, it is the Commons.

    Admit you were wrong, and move on.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,054

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017
    franklyn said:

    SeanT said:

    How about some GOOD NEWS, to cheer up Britain

    After two months of marriage, I can report than I am still deliriously and blissfully in love with my beautiful, funny, sexy, 22 year old wife, who somehow finds me attractive in return (or so she says).

    Who knew? We have developed such a telepathy that when we are apart we wake, in the middle of the night, at exactly the same time, and email each other, only to find that the other was simultaneously emailing us back.

    It is odd. It is love. It is very nice. Life goes on, and not always in a bad way. Enough of this tedious political depressiveness.

    Good to know that Sean T, a professional writer of fiction of some acclaim, if still turning out fiction from his lonely bed-sit in Neasden. In a changing world, some things never change.
    :lol: In one multiverse that must be true!

    PS I prefer the SeanT's happy ending in this multiverse though.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170

    HYUFD said:

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    An allegation of rape concerning a Labour official can get in line behind the vital work the Police are doing investigating a Tory watching legal porn
    Yes, silly me. Not to mention investigating long dead Tories. I assume the Police have not got sufficient resources to investigate Bex Bailey's claim.
    I hate to say it but had it been a Tory official accused I could not be so sure the Police would not have started their investigations a bit sooner.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.

    https://twitter.com/shippersunbound/status/926934547547197440
    Another rozzer no doubt.

  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    An allegation of rape concerning a Labour official can get in line behind the vital work the Police are doing investigating a Tory watching legal porn
    Yes, silly me. Not to mention investigating long dead Tories. I assume the Police have not got sufficient resources to investigate Bex Bailey's claim.
    I hate to say it but had it been a Tory official accused I could not be so sure the Police would not have started their investigations a bit sooner.
    You may hate to say it but you are right not to be so sure.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,054

    That's great, Sean - many happy years of it.

    On the Green story - a question is the source. Green seems to feel it was the former senior police officer and is embarking on wrestling with him in public, which looks as though it will decide the matter swiftly. The matter is presumably a matter of record and it should be possible for the police to confirm or deny it based on their records. How extreme and how it got there, if it did, may be fuzzier.

    But I rather agree that the Sundays don't have very much news on the harassment front, so maybe the storm is passing?

    Really not that much of a storm if it is passing already, although that's might be the best outcome - in that there aren't that many truly inappropriate people, or god forbid sex pests, and the worst are being smoked out and all parties taking a lesson to be very very careful in future to ensure more do not emerge.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:

    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.

    https://twitter.com/shippersunbound/status/926934547547197440
    Another rozzer no doubt.

    Involved in the raid....
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
    Er wrong again, the government doesn't supply computers, it is the Commons.

    Admit you were wrong, and move on.
    I am wrong, I am wrong, I am wrong.

    Does that feel better? (Cos it doesn't improve DG's chances of survival one iota)
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990
    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    PB is the main reason they invented incognito mode. ;)
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,990

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
    Er wrong again, the government doesn't supply computers, it is the Commons.

    Admit you were wrong, and move on.
    I am wrong, I am wrong, I am wrong.

    Does that feel better? (Cos it doesn't improve DG's chances of survival one iota)
    Looking at porn nine years ago is pretty minor in the scheme of things.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,021

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    Rape requires a complainant. I am not aware she has complained. I may be wrong.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,361
    edited November 2017
    I don't care about Damien Green having porn on his computer. So what if it's "extreme" - how do you define that? As long as it's not illegal it's not our business
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    Sometimes you get crossover of all three.

    It won't be this weekend, but next weekend I'll be publishing a thread about wearing gimp suits.

    I'm not speaking from personal experience, I hasten to add.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,054
    RobD said:

    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    PB is the main reason they invented incognito mode. ;)
    I just hope nobody is writing terrible pornographic fanfiction about PB, combing all personal and/or shameful things into one.
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    RobD said:

    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    PB is the main reason they invented incognito mode. ;)

    When MI5 pull you in for questioning, they first ask "are you or have you ever been a member of PB?"

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170
    edited November 2017

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Anyone know why the Police are apparently not investigating the Bex Bailey rape claim?

    An allegation of rape concerning a Labour official can get in line behind the vital work the Police are doing investigating a Tory watching legal porn
    Yes, silly me. Not to mention investigating long dead Tories. I assume the Police have not got sufficient resources to investigate Bex Bailey's claim.
    I hate to say it but had it been a Tory official accused I could not be so sure the Police would not have started their investigations a bit sooner.
    You may hate to say it but you are right not to be so sure.
    It seems having alienated much of the Black community through Stop and Search the police are now intent on alienating Tories too.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:

    I don't know, I don't have the facts, and the 'facts' are coming from someone with a known beef with Damian Green and the Tories.

    Bob Quick is not a reliable witness.

    https://twitter.com/shippersunbound/status/926934547547197440
    Another rozzer no doubt.

    Involved in the raid....
    A wholly impartial observer.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,170
    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    Sound advice
  • Options

    I don't care about Damien Green having porn on his computer. So what if it's "extreme" - how do you define that? As long as it's not illegal it's not our business

    A legal definition was posted some posts ago in this thread. I was shocked they actually have a legal definition of what extreme porn is.

    Obviously he shouldn't resign over this.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,990

    RobD said:

    kle4 said:

    Twitter is truly bizarre right now, with people providing clarification on the definition of 'extreme' porn (violence, bestiality or necrophilia) and Damian Green tweeting a screenshot of a statement someone has prepped and emailed to him, denying everything.

    Tbh, if his IT skills are so poor, I'm amazed he found the porn at all.

    LOL. If there is one thing that is very easy it is finding porn - human ingenuity has made it so.
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    There is a difference between 'extreme' and illegal.

    If it wasn't legal, they clearly had an obligation to pass it up to the CPS - and yet no charges were made.

    Having a taste for some unusual porn does not automatically make you a criminal or unfit for public office.
    Having on your office computer does normally mean you'd breach most workplace IT policies though. Happened to a colleague of mine more than 10 years ago. Instant dismissal for gross professional misconduct.
    Though most workplace computers now block it anyway.
    This guy had downloaded stuff on his home network onto his work laptop, which he then brought into work. Unfortunately for him, there was also a piece of software installed which picks up on keywords, then screenshots what the user is doing, with a time and date stamp.

    I don't think it was extreme, just your average porn, but he's never worked in my profession again.
    Moral of the story, treat homeworking as you would at office working.
    Indeed, very silly. How hard is it to have a separate device for porn, I mean really?

    You should all your shameful stuff on one device to keep it away from work and acceptable social stuff.

    Porn
    Terrible fanfiction
    PB
    PB is the main reason they invented incognito mode. ;)

    When MI5 pull you in for questioning, they first ask "are you or have you ever been a member of PB?"

    A similar question was asked on those green forms you used to have to fill out when flying to the US... :p
  • Options
    anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,578

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
    You were quite correct in the action you took.

    If Green knowingly downloaded porn, legal or not, on to a parliamentary computer then he is knee deep in something unpleasant. If he used a personal computer then, as long as the material is legal, this is a non-story.
  • Options

    I don't care about Damien Green having porn on his computer. So what if it's "extreme" - how do you define that? As long as it's not illegal it's not our business

    The point is the government he's a member of attempted to do just that and make it illegal. Which is I guess why it appears in an historic allegation to spice it up. To add an hypocrisy angle.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017
    Sean_F said:

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
    Er wrong again, the government doesn't supply computers, it is the Commons.

    Admit you were wrong, and move on.
    I am wrong, I am wrong, I am wrong.

    Does that feel better? (Cos it doesn't improve DG's chances of survival one iota)
    Looking at porn nine years ago is pretty minor in the scheme of things.
    I worked for a company who dismissed a senior manager in 2002 for downloading porn onto an office PC (please note @TSE). Everybody was shocked but no one I spoke to thought the company had acted unreasonably given the circumstances. In the real world people know it's unacceptable to view or downoad porn on work PCs and most have always known that.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,858
    edited November 2017

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    So story is 'Government Minister watches legal porn'?

    What a farce.
    If it was legal and it was on a personal computer then there's no issue here.

    If it was on a taxpayer-funded computer then it is altogether more serious. In most workplaces using work IT facilities to view porn is a dismissable offence.
    I'll give you an example.

    About a decade ago, a client sent me an email attachment with the message 'To cheer up your day'

    I downloaded the file and it was a word file with a load of picture from porn films.

    I informed IT and my supervising partner.
    You were quite correct in the action you took.

    If Green knowingly downloaded porn, legal or not, on to a parliamentary computer then he is knee deep in something unpleasant. If he used a personal computer then, as long as the material is legal, this is a non-story.
    Well put. Agree entirely.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902
    edited November 2017
    Deputy PM in man watches porn shocker. Providing that it isn't illegal, which presumably it isn't given that no charges were pressed it's a little bit of a pathetic 'scandal'.
  • Options

    I don't care about Damien Green having porn on his computer. So what if it's "extreme" - how do you define that? As long as it's not illegal it's not our business

    The point is the government he's a member of attempted to do just that and make it illegal. Which is I guess why it appears in an historic allegation to spice it up. To add an hypocrisy angle.
    Politician in hypocrisy shock.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:
    I believe this new phone line has prompted some of tonight's revelations.

    Thinking of a totally independent body to deal with these complaints including bullying just how may it effect people like McDonnell and his verbal abuse directed to Esther McVey

  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,902

    Sean_F said:

    So can the likes of Surbiton and BenPointer tell me what Government role Damian Green had in 2008, because according to you two he had a government laptop.

    Government supplied PC. Just like teachers in state schools have a government supplied PC. The point is if it wasn't his own personal property it's a more serious matter imo.
    Er wrong again, the government doesn't supply computers, it is the Commons.

    Admit you were wrong, and move on.
    I am wrong, I am wrong, I am wrong.

    Does that feel better? (Cos it doesn't improve DG's chances of survival one iota)
    Looking at porn nine years ago is pretty minor in the scheme of things.
    I worked for a company who dismissed a senior manager in 2002 for downloading porn onto an office PC (please note @TSE). Everybody was shocked but no one I spoke to thought the company had acted unreasonably given the circumstances. In the real world people know it's unacceptable to view or downoad porn on work PCs and most have always known that.
    More to the point, who downloads porn these days?
This discussion has been closed.