politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Theresa’s Tories still being hit by the GE2017 branding gamble
It was noticing the photograph above of the Conservative battle bus at the general election that reminded me what a huge gamble the blue team made at the last election by putting everything on Theresa May.
Stable always was a nonsense. There were many ways to describe the period of Conservative majority 2015-17, but stable was certainly not one of them. When the u-turn/non u- turn on the dementia tax took place, it kicked away the strong and leadership bit too. Slogans are all well and good (long term economic plan), but they have to bear some relation to reality.
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Given that she will go before another GE, is it good tactics to change sooner or later ?
She's buying the Tories two days in opposition with every day she remains in power.
If she has another Grenfell then you might as well give Corbyn the keys to Number 10 now.
There you may be being pessimistic. There are many pitfalls for Labour too, not least their leadership which remains weak and incompetent, also with an average age above 60.
Regarding Grenfell, first of all let's hope there isn't another one. Numerous blocks have failed and are undergoing hurried repairs but the only ones to have been forcibly evacuated (and evacuated in a bungled fashion that would have disgraced a fairly competent six year old, at that) were by a Labour council.
Incidentally, am I the only person wondering why Emma Dent Coad appears so desperate for the Grenfell enquiry not to go ahead?
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Given that she will go before another GE, is it good tactics to change sooner or later ?
She's buying the Tories two days in opposition with every day she remains in power.
If she has another Grenfell then you might as well give Corbyn the keys to Number 10 now.
There you may be being pessimistic. There are many pitfalls for Labour too, not least their leadership which remains weak and incompetent, also with an average age above 60.
Regarding Grenfell, first of all let's hope there isn't another one. Numerous blocks have failed and are undergoing hurried repairs but the only ones to have been forcibly evacuated (and evacuated in a bungled fashion that would have disgraced a fairly competent six year old, at that) were by a Labour council.
Incidentally, am I the only person wondering why Emma Dent Coad appears so desperate for the Grenfell enquiry not to go ahead?
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Given that she will go before another GE, is it good tactics to change sooner or later ?
She's buying the Tories two days in opposition with every day she remains in power.
If she has another Grenfell then you might as well give Corbyn the keys to Number 10 now.
There you may be being pessimistic. There are many pitfalls for Labour too, not least their leadership which remains weak and incompetent, also with an average age above 60.
Regarding Grenfell, first of all let's hope there isn't another one. Numerous blocks have failed and are undergoing hurried repairs but the only ones to have been forcibly evacuated (and evacuated in a bungled fashion that would have disgraced a fairly competent six year old, at that) were by a Labour council.
Incidentally, am I the only person wondering why Emma Dent Coad appears so desperate for the Grenfell enquiry not to go ahead?
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
In fairness, if Isobel 'Dead Pig' Oakeshott said anything, I would in default of other evidence assume the opposite was true.
However, in this case there is fairly ample evidence that he does indeed have a serious problem.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
Right, but if he wants to keep his job or get another, he may find it helpful to point to some tinfoil hattery as evidence that he was off his trolley whatever his fans want.
He is the Japanese soldier in the Philippines who did not surrender in 1972. How he persuaded himself that the war was not over, despite ample evidence to the contrary, is really quite illuminating. And he's not unique. There was another who didn't surrender till 1974 and others may well have held out longer and died later.
Obviously there’s not too many buses around with the office-style fitout and comms package.
Who else uses them apart from politicians?
Cricket teams.
Pakistan's team coach is the same vehicle as infamous Brexit bus pledging to fund NHS
Mickey Arthur's side face the Proteas in Birmingham today looking for their first win of the competition after their opening defeat against arch-rivals India.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
Maybe, but she needs to crack on really. Her not condemning Trump was a mis-step: that's a free hit on an unpopular president saying stupid things.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
Correction: he claims to be relying on BoJo, we have no idea how much of what he's tweeting is true.
Mr. Topping, if May said that she'd be toppled before she finished speaking.
La reine est mort, vive le roi (ie Jacob).
Yes I'm afraid you are probably right. But as any Leaver will tell you, there was no manifesto for Leave, it is up to the government, so there is no reason she couldn't.
Plus, thinking about it - she is funnily enough safer than she has ever been. What are they going to do? Throw her out? There would have to be a GE and even bonkers Brexiters don't want one of those.
Obviously there’s not too many buses around with the office-style fitout and comms package.
Who else uses them apart from politicians?
Cricket teams.
Pakistan's team coach is the same vehicle as infamous Brexit bus pledging to fund NHS
Mickey Arthur's side face the Proteas in Birmingham today looking for their first win of the competition after their opening defeat against arch-rivals India.
Ha, indeed it is! Maybe they’re flexible enough to change them around inside depending on the customer, a sports team bus interior is usually like a first class train carriage.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
I suppose that's the nature of tweeting, but in my book, saying publicly I have been told not to be nasty to him because he is mad...is not cricket.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
Correction: he claims to be relying on BoJo, we have no idea how much of what he's tweeting is true.
At the same time as calling him names. https://twitter.com/James08209590/status/899596617422168064 The guy is losing it, I suggest we all leave him to it. The British Embassy in Athens will know about him and deal with whatever needs doing.
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
I suppose that's the nature of tweeting, but in my book, saying publicly I have been told not to be nasty to him because he is mad...is not cricket.
I see your point. I guess she just wanted to shut him up.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
Well she did win the Election, but it was also a failure. @ThreeQuidder didn't call it a success.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She won the election, Mike, get over it.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
Mr. Smithson, reminds me a little of the old Third Crusade debate (although Richard's task was far harder than May's, and he was far more competent). Retook Acre but didn't get Jerusalem. Success, or failure?
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She won the election, Mike, get over it.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
By her own metric she lost the election.
She said if she lost six seats she'd lose the election. She lost more than six.
re Theresa's success or otherwise, I think the point is that she ended up in a worse position than she started, and she didn't need to do it.
That is the key issue.
If there was a statutory election, she fought and won, then well done her. But this was entirely to increase her existing majority, was not needed, and she failed in the only thing she held the election for. Hence I think it fair to say she failed, although of course "won" the election (in quote marks because she didn't win the election as in win an overall majority allowing her party to make decisions unilaterally win the election).
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
She couldn't do that - how about Boris ;-)
If they topple her there is a GE (imagine the Evening Standard leaders). No one wants that.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Meeting plod quite often in the line of duty, I'd have to disagree.
A lot of people would certainly get liquidated, but rather too many would be Brazilian electricians.
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
She couldn't do that - how about Boris ;-)
If they topple her there is a GE (imagine the Evening Standard leaders). No one wants that.
Well, it wasn't a serious suggestion, but would there need to be a GE? If Tory/DUP choose to stick together then it could be business as usual (SNAFU).
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She won the election, Mike, get over it.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
By her own metric she lost the election.
She said if she lost six seats she'd lose the election. She lost more than six.
You have to admire Mr £3 tenaciousness in the face of the facts.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Did you miss the Borough Market incident ?
Eight minutes from first 999 call to dead terrorists is not too shabby....
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Meeting plod quite often in the line of duty, I'd have to disagree.
A lot of people would certainly get liquidated, but rather too many would be Brazilian electricians.
Perhaps you are right, we need EU migrant cops if we want crack shots. Our own bobbies are not up to the same standard.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Did you miss the Borough Market incident ?
Eight minutes from first 999 call to dead terrorists is not too shabby....
That was thanks to our membership of the EU - will decline to 3rd world standards after Brexit.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Did you miss the Borough Market incident ?
The equivalent to Cambrils would perhaps be Cromer.
London is unusual in having armed cops minutes away. When the Whitehaven shootings happened it took an hour for armed cops to get there.
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
She couldn't do that - how about Boris ;-)
If they topple her there is a GE (imagine the Evening Standard leaders). No one wants that.
Well, it wasn't a serious suggestion, but would there need to be a GE? If Tory/DUP choose to stick together then it could be business as usual (SNAFU).
No indeed I got the non-serious bit, but just thinking further about it, May is safe as houses - I really don't think they could get away with two coronations because people would say: unelected May just scraped through, unelected second guy would get a hiding and you need to give us the opportunity to give it to him.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She won the election, Mike, get over it.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
By her own metric she lost the election.
She said if she lost six seats she'd lose the election. She lost more than six.
Didn't she say that if she lost six seats Corbyn would become PM? That was wrong too.
What is it that Theresa May is going to say or do that will change people's opinions of her again? It's hard to imagine in practice.
I imagine she will try to have a 'reboot' or 3, but none of them will land.
She was never 'popular' as a warm personality, but for being 'strong and stable' and ' A safe pair of hands'. She has lost that, and I can't see how she can ever get that back again.
Eventually, she will make a big mistake or circumstances will make it look like she has, her popularity will plummet even more and she will be given a chance to retire with grace and make way for someone else.
No, she can't turn it round, but she can salvage her reputation and depart with grace, if Brexit can be negotiated without total chaos. How big an 'if' that is remains to be seen.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
She would need to grasp the nettle and announce that we were staying in the single market and customs union and that for this the ECJ would be the final arbiter. She could then go strongly into bat for some kind of restriction on freedom of movement analagous to the emergency brake available a la EEA rules.
She couldn't do that - how about Boris ;-)
If they topple her there is a GE (imagine the Evening Standard leaders). No one wants that.
Well, it wasn't a serious suggestion, but would there need to be a GE? If Tory/DUP choose to stick together then it could be business as usual (SNAFU).
No indeed I got the non-serious bit, but just thinking further about it, May is safe as houses - I really don't think they could get away with two coronations because people would say: unelected May just scraped through, unelected second guy would get a hiding and you need to give us the opportunity to give it to him.
Any new Tory leader will have to go for an election. If before March 2019, they would have to say that there will be one in June 2019, as they may be able to get away with delaying for Brexit talks
It could be smart. If you want later to disown your Twittery and get away with it by telling everyone you were mentally ill when you wrote all that then, a good start might be to appear to be a complete nutter now. You can then argue that all of it was of a piece.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
But when Isobel Oakeshott implied he was mentally ill, his fans slaughtered her
If she knew him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet. If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
He slagged her off in public, so she mentioned that she had been told not to respond harshly as he wasn't well. Fair enough comeback I'd say
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
Correction: he claims to be relying on BoJo, we have no idea how much of what he's tweeting is true.
At the same time as calling him names. https://twitter.com/James08209590/status/899596617422168064 The guy is losing it, I suggest we all leave him to it. The British Embassy in Athens will know about him and deal with whatever needs doing.
Given he is claiming to have been arrested, drugged and assaulted on the orders of HMG that sounds a bit ominous...
What is it that Theresa May is going to say or do that will change people's opinions of her again? It's hard to imagine in practice.
Something will happen before long that will give her the opportunity to re-assert herself. Whether or not she's up to it remains to be seen.
I doubt it personally.
You've either got the want to go for a drink with factor or you haven't.
She transparently doesn't have it, which was fine when the perception was we need a harsh taskmistress to get us through Brexit. But this no longer applies now either - you can't be a harsh taskmistress if no one needs to listen to you and your threats.
She's a loser, to quote a message aimed at another Tory PM..
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
Far too soon to depose a leader who just won a general election.
Even by your standards that is a very stupid comment. She went into the election with the express objective of winning a bigger majority. She ended up without a majority at all. I call that failure.
She won the election, Mike, get over it.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
By her own metric she lost the election.
She said if she lost six seats she'd lose the election. She lost more than six.
You have to admire Mr £3 tenaciousness in the face of the facts.
The facts are that she got most votes, most seats and was the only possible PM.
Maybe, but she needs to crack on really. Her not condemning Trump was a mis-step: that's a free hit on an unpopular president saying stupid things.
She did condemn him, in no uncertain terms.
That's she's perceived by some as not having done so is a fine example of the fact that she's now being treated unfairly unfavourably, in contrast to the period before the election when she was being over-praised.
Spanish police do seem very effective. Gunning down 5 terrorists in a resort like cambrils before they got anyone was particularly so, as not a high profile area.
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
Did you miss the Borough Market incident ?
The equivalent to Cambrils would perhaps be Cromer.
You think those drunken pikeys should have been shot dead on Saturday night ?
Comments
You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.
As always in politics, never say never - but realistically, no.
Is it the same bus?
Worst of all she lost the Tory majority against an IRA condoning Trot.
She should be forced to do the walk of shame in Manchester next month.
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/theresa-mays-recycled-battle-bus/
Although I suppose a rump is an arse, and that could be a point of similarity.
(And yes, I know you were referring to Amery and Chamberlain.)
Slogans are all well and good (long term economic plan), but they have to bear some relation to reality.
Although many of her woes are self-inflicted, it's also the case that the media like to knock down those that they have built up. Before the election, she was getting an over-favourable press, and a correction was inevitable. What was surprising was the speed and ferocity of that correction.
Jeremy Corbyn has arguably followed the reverse trajectory, but Labour shouldn't kid themselves that the fundamentals have changed.
If she has another Grenfell then you might as well give Corbyn the keys to Number 10 now.
Hope he gets back to UK asap.
It is the Blackadder Goes Forth strategy of wearing your underpants on your head, sticking pencils up your nose and going "wibble, wibble".
Regarding Grenfell, first of all let's hope there isn't another one. Numerous blocks have failed and are undergoing hurried repairs but the only ones to have been forcibly evacuated (and evacuated in a bungled fashion that would have disgraced a fairly competent six year old, at that) were by a Labour council.
Incidentally, am I the only person wondering why Emma Dent Coad appears so desperate for the Grenfell enquiry not to go ahead?
However, in this case there is fairly ample evidence that he does indeed have a serious problem.
Blair, Cameron, Thatcher et al managed it.
If she didn't know him to be mentally ill then it was inappropriate to tweet.
Who else uses them apart from politicians?
A propos I read this chap's book a while ago and it was very interesting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroo_Onoda
He is the Japanese soldier in the Philippines who did not surrender in 1972. How he persuaded himself that the war was not over, despite ample evidence to the contrary, is really quite illuminating. And he's not unique. There was another who didn't surrender till 1974 and others may well have held out longer and died later.
What on earth is she doing?
You lack patience for a 5 year game.
Pakistan's team coach is the same vehicle as infamous Brexit bus pledging to fund NHS
Mickey Arthur's side face the Proteas in Birmingham today looking for their first win of the competition after their opening defeat against arch-rivals India.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/cricket/pakistans-team-coach-same-vehicle-10578711
Although interestingly he is also the only one who won every non-constituency vote he was responsible for.
Now he is relying on Boris "lock him up" Johnson to get him out of Greece.. karma
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/17/theresa-may-seeks-david-camerons-advice-prime-minister-prepares/
https://twitter.com/helenlewis/status/897562893440372736
Yes I'm afraid you are probably right. But as any Leaver will tell you, there was no manifesto for Leave, it is up to the government, so there is no reason she couldn't.
Plus, thinking about it - she is funnily enough safer than she has ever been. What are they going to do? Throw her out? There would have to be a GE and even bonkers Brexiters don't want one of those.
https://twitter.com/James08209590/status/899596617422168064
The guy is losing it, I suggest we all leave him to it. The British Embassy in Athens will know about him and deal with whatever needs doing.
It's a bit much you calling me stupid when you were the one touting James Chapman as the new great hope for the continuity Remainers!
Finnish plod not slouches either. About time our boys in blue got firearms as a routine.
She said if she lost six seats she'd lose the election. She lost more than six.
That is the key issue.
If there was a statutory election, she fought and won, then well done her. But this was entirely to increase her existing majority, was not needed, and she failed in the only thing she held the election for. Hence I think it fair to say she failed, although of course "won" the election (in quote marks because she didn't win the election as in win an overall majority allowing her party to make decisions unilaterally win the election).
A lot of people would certainly get liquidated, but rather too many would be Brazilian electricians.
Looks like the police didn't have time to enter into this theological discussion.
Being powerful is like being a lady.
If you have to tell people you are, you ain't.....
https://twitter.com/itsRamel/status/899643533048635392
London is unusual in having armed cops minutes away. When the Whitehaven shootings happened it took an hour for armed cops to get there.
Though voters fell out of love with Cameron following Coulson and the pasty tax but he got them back for the next general election organically.
She was never 'popular' as a warm personality, but for being 'strong and stable' and ' A safe pair of hands'. She has lost that, and I can't see how she can ever get that back again.
Eventually, she will make a big mistake or circumstances will make it look like she has, her popularity will plummet even more and she will be given a chance to retire with grace and make way for someone else.
I doubt it personally.
I don't buy this 'Corbyn was given an easy time' argument I keep seeing
She transparently doesn't have it, which was fine when the perception was we need a harsh taskmistress to get us through Brexit. But this no longer applies now either - you can't be a harsh taskmistress if no one needs to listen to you and your threats.
She now just has to soldier on.
She won.
That's she's perceived by some as not having done so is a fine example of the fact that she's now being treated unfairly unfavourably, in contrast to the period before the election when she was being over-praised.
Where else might she start a war?
Admiral Akbar?
Though we might have to give up sovereignty of The Rock to get a good Brexit deal.
Not sure I'd go that far..
http://commentcentral.co.uk/brexit-negotiations-the-davis-poker-face/